You are on page 1of 5

Annexure Engineering Geological MSc.

Thesis, 2005

No. Station name Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
1. Chacha 12.0 24.7 44.7 39.5 47.7 66.3 286.2 269.8 109.0 13.7 8.5 1.8 923.9
2. Chancho 24.7 33.7 60.2 61.6 58.3 152.4 323.1 304.5 124.9 26.6 7.1 15.0 1192.1
3. Debre birhan 11.7 28.2 59.7 43.6 48.9 41.1 238.1 278.6 101.1 12.9 14.3 4.2 891.4
4. Dejen 5.7 20.5 56.4 60.5 95.1 104.2 285.5 276.4 139.2 76.7 20.3 6.4 1146.9
5. Deneba 16.4 38.3 36.6 56.2 52.0 83.1 326.8 264.8 115.8 34.0 2.0 6.7 1032.7
6. Derba 22.7 43.3 60.7 70.7 76.1 135.3 324.1 339.0 174.4 29.6 11.1 15.7 1302.7
7. Fiche 13.0 52.4 71.6 65.1 62.5 49.4 254.0 279 99.8 15.0 6.5 6.1 9744
8. Filklik 1.8 9.8 36.3 47.5 81.0 100.3 285.0 272.9 127.9 45.0 10.0 2.5 1020
9. Gebre Guracha 8.5 16.1 42.7 77.1 95.6 130.9 337.2 352.8 166.2 25.1 8.1 9.2 1269.5
10. GohaTtsion 9.9 19.6 49.7 49.8 103.4 119.3 106.2 296.5 121.6 48.1 11.8 7.8 1142.7
11. Inchini 19.5 41.0 64.7 75.9 41.7 138.7 276.4 232.5 146.4 39.1 10.1 9.3 1095.3
12. Lemi 14.2 36.2 81.0 77.2 64.8 68.6 341.4 352.0 97.4 24.5 6.1 10.0 1173.5
13. Molale 12.0 23.3 45.9 49.6 41.1 41.3 218.4 250.2 86.3 28.9 7.5 7.5 821.0
14. Muke Turi 25.1 45.8 71.3 70.3 54.8 68.1 255.1 267.2 1115.3 19.9 3.9 14.7 1011.5
15. Sela Dingay 16.0 31.7 45.0 50.7 50.7 90.1 283.6 272.4 96.5 20.1 9.2 8.5 974.5
16. Shekute 19.6 49.9 93.7 86.6 128.3 226.8 375.7 377.8 204.6 54.2 17.7 11.7 1646.6
17. Sheno 12.9 29.5 51.3 62.2 46.2 73.1 286.7 290.2 105.9 18.5 5.2 4.8 986.5
18. Sululta 25.4 30.9 87.7 72.3 83.7 148.8 314.3 241.5 89.3 19.9 8.0 5.0 1148.0
19. Tikur Inchini 25.9 45.7 93.1 93.1 138.9 215.3 271.5 331.9 202.7 70.1 16.3 10.4 1551.2
20. Belo 0.8 3.5 32.1 52.8 153.9 253.8 316.5 277.3 323.6 101.4 13.4 5.0 1534.1
21. Debre Tsige 11.9 34.4 66.5 78.9 27.3 49.9 259.8 236.2 113.6 13.4 1.2 9.2 902.3
22. Dera 7.7 20.3 68.7 73.3 36.7 66.8 301.5 373.3 115.1 12.4 6.7 19.1 1101.6
(Gundomeskel)
23. Enewari 20.5 28.2 162.1 62.2 44.8 81.1 335.2 308.5 112.1 8.9 28.9 8.3 1201.1
24. Gorfo 28.3 18.4 36.8 23.2 48.3 87.1 235.5 241.3 88.4 30.6 35.5 3.7 877.1
25. Gudeberet 14.1 18.7 28.3 24.4 23.4 38.3 238.8 177.3 82.7 20.8 25.2 1.2 693.2
26. Haro Aleltu 0.0 4.8 31.7 72.6 150.3 217.3 247.7 298.5 232.0 104.3 11.3 77.6 1380.2
27. Hoha 0.0 0.3 5.4 37.0 140.0 210.9 193.7 196.4 168.3 82.1 3.7 0.6 1038.4
28. Jeldu 39.9 78.3 143.5 180. 109.8 250.3 426.5 403.0 386.6 131.9 11.1 15.2 2176.6
6
29. Kachise 14.7 34.8 90.4 69.8 96.8 274.9 411.4 416.2 281.5 82.6 5.9 20.2 1772.1
30. Kebe 7.7 4.9 28.3 29.3 177.5 190.2 297.2 347.3 196.8 203.6 108.9 4.5 1696.2
31. Mehal Meda 16.0 72.3 55.6 82.1 25.0 15.3 209.4 251.5 56.0 24.5 1.4 7.1 816.1
32. Mekane Selam 21.9 71.9 91.3 118. 57.0 113.2 200.0 223.3 126.0 12.9 16.2 12.1 1064.9
1
33. Mendida 7.1 42.0 60.3 75.9 16.2 29.9 262.7 256.6 123.9 3.7 4.3 4.2 895.8
34. Werejiru 2.4 3.6 34.5 29.5 221.4 323.5 385.8 362.1 342.1 187.4 14.2 4.7 1911.2
Annexure I The average monthly rainfall processed data for all 34 stations is
presented at.

121
Annexure Engineering Geological MSc. Thesis, 2005

Annexure II A land covers classification of Abay basin

Category Class Sub-class


1 Cultivated Rain fed
Irrigated
Perennial
Sate farm
2 Afro-Alpine
3 Forest Disturbed
Very disturbed
4 Plantation Eucalyptus
5 Woodland Dense
Open
Riparian
6 Bushland Dense
Open
Riparian
7 Shrubland Dense
Open
8 Bamboo
9 Grassland Open
Bushed/Shrubed
Wooded
10 Wetland & Water Water body
body
Perennial Swamp/marsh
Seasonal swamp/marsh
11 Bare land Rock
12 Urban

122
Annexure Engineering Geological MSc. Thesis, 2005

Annexure V Weathering grade for rock mass by Irfan and Dearman, 1978

Term Description Weathering


Grade
Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering; perhaps slight
Discoloration on major discontinuity surface. I
Slightly Discoloration indicates weathering of the rock material
Weathered And discontinuity surface II
Less than 35% of the rock material is decomposed and/ or disintegrated to
Moderately a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present
Weathered Either as a continuous frame work as core stone. III
Highly More than 35% of the rock material is decomposed and/ or
weathered Disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present either as a
continuous frame work as core stone. IV
Extremely All the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to
weathered A soil. the original mass structure is still largely intact
V
Residual All the rock material is converted to soil. the mass structure
soil And material fabrics are destroyed.
VI

Annexure VI SARC Computer Program

A Brief outline of SARC computer program

The computer program SARC is prepared by Prof. Bhawani Singh, Department of Engineering,
Indian Institute of Techonology. The program (x) is written in Fortran 77 and EXE files work in
DOS environment. The users’ manual is also indexed as IX.NEW for preparation of input data
files. Further, typical input data files are also given as IX.DAT beginning with I. The
corresponding out put files OX.DAT are added, beginning with O.

The typical computer commands are:


NE IX.DAT- To open input file
NE OX.DAT- To open out put file
X- Name of computer program
IX.DAT- Input file name
OX.DAT- Output file name
2- For execution
1- For help menu
NE OX.DAT- To see the output file OX.DAT

129
Annexure Engineering Geological MSc. Thesis, 2005

SARC
This program facilitates to compute the factor of safety with circular failure surface emerging at
the toe. It analyses any general profile of the slope surface and for various forces that is pore
water pressure, depth of tension crack at the top of the slope, depth of water in tension crack and
earthquake force. In the first step it draws the various slip surfaces along which failure can take
place. Then it calculates the radius and center of each slip surface.
In the next step, the factor of safety is computed using Bishop,s equation for various slip surfaces
until a minimum factor of safety is obtained. The analysis evaluates critical acceleration for
slopes with factor of safety less than unity and compute dynamic displacement utilizing
coorelation developed by Lavania et al. (1987).

Annexure VII Head losses

Description Trash Gate Butterfly Total H.


Friction Entrance Rank Exit Bend Valve Valve Losses
Beresa PH1 2.48 0.159 0.159 0.319 0 1.37 0.10 4.6
Alternative I PH2 10.18 0.159 0.159 0.319 0.064 1.37 0.10 12.3
Beresa
Alternative II PH3 12.67 0.159 0.159 0.319 0.064 1.37 0.10 14.8
Chacha 18.63 0.159 0.159 0.319 0.064 1.37 0.10 20.8
Gur 68.69 0.159 0.159 0.319 0.064 1.37 0.10 70.9
Robi Gumero 32.02 0.159 0.159 0.319 0.064 1.37 0.10 34.2

Annexure VIII Manning roughness coefficient

Value of n Condition of channel


0.011-0.012 Smooth clean wood, metal or concrete surfaces, without projections, and with straight
alignment
0.013 Smooth wood, metal, or concrete surfaces without projections, free from algae or insect
growth, mostly straight alignment
0.014 Good wood, metal, or concrete surfaces with only small projections, with some curvature,
slight algae or insect growths, and minimal gravel or sand deposition. Troweled gunnite
surfaces
0.015 Wood with large and moss growth, concrete with smooth sides and rough bottom, metal
with shallow projections
0.016 Metal flumes with large projections. Wood or concrete with well-developed moss or algae
growths
0.017 Rough concrete or untroweled gunnite surfaces
0.018 Smooth natural earth cannels, free from growths with straight alignment
0.019-0.020 Smooth natural earth, free from growths with some curvature. Large cannels in good
condition
0.020-0.025 Small cannels in good condition, larger cannels with some growth
0.025-0.035 Cannels with dense aquatic growths

130
Annexure Engineering Geological MSc. Thesis, 2005

Annexure IX Graph to work out Design dimensions for desilting tank (Kumar et al, 1990)
1990)

131

You might also like