Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared For:
PROF. MADYA MOHD NOR
Prepared By:
Group:
The punishment is in place to make the public more aware, and the
six strokes won't hurt, it's just a deterrent.
Like many Malaysians, I was shocked to hear that 32-year old Kartika Sari
Dewi Shukarno was sentenced to be whipped six times by the Syariah High
Court in Kuantan for drinking alcohol at a nightclub. Many of my Muslim and
non-Muslim friends also voiced their concern that something like this could
end up giving people a bad impression of Islam. "Why so severe?" We all
thought. Isn't whipping for drug offenders and rapists?
The law allocates that the "whip" should be made of rattan or a small branch
without segments. Its length should be no more than 1.22 metres, and its
circumference no more than 1.25 cm.
If the accused is pregnant, the punishment will be postponed and will only be
carried out 2 months after the birth of the child or in the event of a
miscarriage.
Speaking to Berita Harian reporters, Kartika herself has said that she is
willing to accept her punishment and be whipped. She was quoted as saying,
"I want to undergo the punishment because I have repented". She also
advised members
of the public to think about the consequences of their actions.
2
The mother of two had initially planned to appeal the sentence, but decided
to pay the RM5000 fine and undergo the whipping as soon as possible. It is
heartening to read that Kartika says she can face the punishment because
her family, especially her father, 60-year old Shukarno Abdul Mutalib, is
giving her
their full support.
I think Kartika & this Caning Issue did a great job in making the real facts of
the punishment known to the public. Unfortunately, there is group outside
there will still have a field day, treating this as another scandal in the global
Muslim community. I myself can't comment on other statement made by 3rd
parties about the religious matters, but as a Muslim, I can whole heartedly
say that I now believe that Kartika's punishment is fair.
3
2. The problem that led to the formulation of the policy
July 20. 2009 -- A 32-year-old mother of two is sentenced to six lashes with a
rattan cane for drinking beer at a hotel in Pahang state in 2007. The
sentence hasn't been carried out, despite her requests to get it over with.
Feb 7, 2010. Fifteen Muslims, including two women, are arrested by religious
authorities in Pahang state for illegally consuming alcohol. Eleven others are
detained for unlawful close proximity to members of the opposite sex.
Feb. 9, 2010 -- Four men and, for the first time, three women, are caned
after being found guilty in an Islamic court of having sex out of wedlock.
The move to cane the women under the country's Islamic Shariah laws has
raised fresh concerns about the growing political and judicial influence of
Islam in what traditionally has been one of the world's more moderate
Muslim nations.
The caning of Ms. Kartika, who is a Muslim, still hasn't been carried out
despite her requests to the Islamic courts to get it over with.
Due to this canning issue, followed another announcement that three Muslim
women were caned on Feb. 9 for having illicit sex thus came as a shock to
many Malaysians.
Later in the day, in a statement that four men also were sentenced and
caned in connection with the case.
All seven were found guilty of illicit sex and sentenced by a Shariah court in
the Kuala Lumpur area between December and January.
Two of the women and the four men were each struck six times, while the
other woman was struck four times.
Malaysia has a two-track legal system in which Shariah laws are applied to
its majority Muslim population, while its large ethnic-Chinese and Indian
minorities answer only to civilian courts.
4
There is positive and negative response are existing according to this Kartika
issue’s caning, including from a top level of Ministry, politician, Non-
Government Associate, academician and individual.
Political analysts say the rapid growth of Malaysia's Shariah court system in
recent years, however, is threatening to undermine the country's reputation
as a tolerant, progressive Muslim nation that has been able to attract sizable
foreign investments in manufacturing and services.
Some analysts have ascribed the increasingly political role of Islam in the
country to the country's race-based politics. Many ethnic Malays view their
Islamic faith as a symbol of their racial identity and a sign of their privileged
economic status, which includes a wide range of affirmative-action policies
providing them preferential treatment over non-Malay minorities.
The country's increasingly Islamic outlook also reflects the growing political
role of the faith as the ruling National Front and the Pan-Malaysian Islamic
Party -- one of the main parties in an opposition coalition -- compete to
demonstrate which has the strongest Muslim credentials.
5
While Mr. P. Gunasegaran (No to whipping for drinking, 28 Aug 2009, Star)
and those in the similar vein are entitled to their freedom of expression, it
nonetheless needs to be pointed out that his abrasive intrusion into the
intoxicating whipping debate is in extreme bad taste and a blatant affront to
Muslim sensitivity.
His high and mighty pronouncement based on his secular theology and his
one sentence reference to some unnamed Muslim scholar, makes him an
overnight jurist !
Barbaric, cruel, and inhumane are after all relative terms that are employed
to demonize the other. This media onslaught, directly or indirectly, knowingly
or unknowingly, attempts to belittle and humiliate the Shariah justice
system, an entire institution whose place in our nation is legitimated by
history and the Constitution.
What else does one make of the following headlines “and lets do away with a
slew of outmoded, archaic laws in the statute books, both syariah and civil”.
He further adds “there is real danger of disarray when man purports to
speak for God”. I hasten to respond by asking - should we then let him (the
editor) play God or better still be God ?
6
As Muslims we have no difficulty accepting that non-Muslims have different
beliefs and live their lives differently than we do. Please show us the same
courtesy.
His editorial among others, reflect the distressing trend that non-Muslims are
making ill-informed, prejudiced and unwelcome comments on the religion of
the majority of people of this country. This is very unhealthy,
and dangerously crossing the lines of civilized discourse.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Zulfakar, who lectures Islamic criminal law in the International
Islamic University of Malaysia, and Datuk Abdul Munir Yaakob, SUHAKAM
commissioner, concurred that the courts acted within the State Shariah
Criminal Offences Act notwithstanding the seven day remand order.
The Shariah court is part of Malaysia's dual justice system which has
jurisdiction over Muslims and the decision of the Kuantan Shariah High Court
must be respected as such That is the rule of law enjoyed by both the
Shariah and Civil courts and outside interference would tantamount to
contempt of court. The due process of appeal is open to the victim if justice
is not done or seen to be done.
In this media frenzy, the irony has not been lost that Kartika herself has
accepted the sentence and has refused appeal despite the suggestion by no
less the Prime Minister himself. This underscores one of the objectives of the
Shariah, to guide Muslims to be more observant of their religious obligations
through remorse and repentance.
7
modern secular society. Attempts to fit Islam into the secular world view is
like forcing a square peg into a round hole.
Globally, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that alcohol causes
1.8 million deaths (3.2% of total) and 58.3 million (4% of total) of Disability-
Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). The U.S. Department of Justice Report on
Alcohol and Crime found that alcohol abuse was a factor in 40 percent of
violent crimes committed in the U.S. The British Home office reports a figure
of 45% which rose to 58% in cases of attacks by unrecognized persons. We
have not even begun to mention the primary role of alcohol in road traffic
accidents, domestic violence, drug dependence, alcoholism, women and
alcohol, adolescents and alcohol, fatal alcohol syndrome, alcohol and liver
cirrhosis, alcohol and brain damage, alcohol and cancer risk, the causal link
between alcohol and 60 different types of diseases etc.
“They ask you concerning wine and gambling. Say: 'There is a great sin in
both of them, and (some) profits for people; but their sin is greater than their
profit …”
As Muslims, our absolute love and allegiance is to our Creator, whose infinite
wisdom we do not question. Thus, it is completely unacceptable and
reprehensible that any from amongst his creations, should instruct us
otherwise applying their fallible human and secular opinions and standards.
8
April 01, 2010 :Kartika's Caning Sentence Commuted To Community
Service
The caning sentence imposed by the Kuantan Syariah High Court on former
part-time model Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarnor has been commuted to
community service on the orders of the Sultan of Pahang.
Kartika's father Shukarnor Abdul Mutalib said his daughter received a letter
stating as such from the Pahang State Islamic and Malay Culture Council
yesterday.
"Kartika was ordered by the Sultan to do three weeks of community service
at a welfare home in Kuantan instead. “
this issue added that the family was relieved by the latest development and
hoped it would help Kartika to move on with her life, now that there had
been closure to the case.
Kartika, meanwhile, said she was ready to carry out the community service
although the decision came as a surprise.
"I hope this community service will serve as a lesson to others to stay away
from alcohol," said the single-mother.
Kartika was sentenced in July last year to six strokes of the cane and a fine of
RM5,000 for drinking beer in December 2007 at a beach resort in Kuantan, in
violation of Islamic laws.
On Aug 24 2009, she was to be brought to the Kajang Prison to undergo the
caning punishment but it was called off at the eleventh hour.
After a period of being in limbo (as to whether the caning punishment would
be carried out), the matter was brought before the Sultan and hence this
latest development in her case.
9
certain quarters of our people against religious teachings. I am speechless
in awe reflecting on the degree of denial and obstinacy shown.
Time and again it is portrayed over the ill-perceived conflict between the
syariah and civil laws. The recent incident, arguably claimed to have taken
the nation by surprise, even considered a sad black day in the history of
the country, is the purported local and global ‘outcry’ resulting from the
whipping punishment meted and carried out on Muslim (women) syariah
offenders not long ago.
Human rights advocates have been fighting for equality before law for all
genders. Yet, astonishingly, when Islamic law stands in support of their
claim, the very same people accused Syariah as uncompromising,
inhumane, discriminatory, etc.
Islam does not lay rigid emphasis on punitive actions. The whole religion is
about knowledge, education and the inculcation of good values onto human
being. Islam asks Muslims to refer to strict legal solution to solve disputes
only as their last resort. Even this is always preceded with words for
forgiveness and mediation.
Islamic law does not differentiate between male and female offenders. In
fact, in achieving salvation, Islam is giving equal opportunity to both sexes.
In the recent execution of the punishment, apart from the three women
caned, four other male criminals were flogged. But those human rights
vanguards close one eye on this.
10
beliefs.
For the non-Muslims, they appear to have lost the sense of adab, the sense
of respect of other religions. Camouflaging under the ‘sacred’ pretext of
human-rightism , they claim the questionable right to interfere in the
domain they have minimal or no knowledge about - Islam.
I fail to understand what kind of logic these people are holding to.
One of the signs of wisdom is for one to know one’s limit of knowledge. This
implies that one is not supposed to make comments on things that one is
not well informed off. If one lacks knowledge on anything, one must first
gather a sufficient amount of information, data or whatever necessary to fill
the vacuum. Hearsay evidence or mere observation will not do justice to
any particular problem at stake.
After gaining certain knowledge, only then one may issue any remarks. But
even this is to be done with a clear conscience that one may need to
responsibly alter or retract one’s opinion if someone more knowledgeable
points to him that he is mistaken in certain respects or in the entire subject
11
matter.
Let’s affirm the general position that matters of religion do not fall under
the purview of any layman on the street, even an educated one, as there
are conditions to be met. Let’s maintain the status quo that religion is the
business of those qualified experts and professionals.
I believe that the reality out there is not that worse. All the clamorous hue
and cry over certain issues have been sensationalized by irresponsible
perpetrators like unscrupulous journalists and manipulated by social
activists to achieve certain agendas only known best to them.
Amidst the above, all that we need to bear in mind is that we shoulder the
same responsibility to maintain the long inherited peaceful and harmonious
12
living of the nation as it will tremendously drive the country further towards
development and prosperity to the benefit of all.
References
13