Professional Documents
Culture Documents
journalism ethics. News corporations have looked past Barnicle’s ethical slip-ups and
media professionals have made excuses for him. Barnicle even made light of the situation
essence of journalism.
In a sense, Mike Barnicle‟s story is not an uncommon one. The process of his
downfall was similar to that of other fallen journalists: complaints about the integrity of
past articles, and he was asked to resign. Allegations against Barnicle included publishing
George Carlin jokes without citing the comedian, fabricating stories about cancer patients
and quoting individuals with whom he had never spoken, all serious infractions in the
sources with presenting him the material, and though he never officially admitted fault,
Barnicle ultimately resigned from The Boston Globe. That is where Barnicle‟s similarity
to other fallen journalists ends, for his resignation did not signal the end of his career.
Barnicle went on to publish articles in George magazine, and later wrote for both The
Daily News and The Boston Herald (Steinberg). Barnicle‟s continuing career is indicative
of a serious flaw in the world of journalism ethics. News corporations have looked past
Barnicle‟s ethical slip-ups and media professionals have made excuses for him. Barnicle
even made light of the situation in form of sarcastic commentary (Steinberg). Barnicle‟s
The prelude to what should have been Barnicle‟s undoing began in August 1998.
An August 2nd column generated controversy, for Barnicle printed „thoughts‟ that were
remarkably similar to those in a book by George Carlin. “Mr. Barnicle, for example,
wrote in his column, „Someday I'd love to see the Pope appear on his balcony and
announce the baseball scores.‟ In his book, Mr. Carlin writes, „Someday I wanna see the
Pope come out on that balcony and give the football scores,‟” (Barringer, “Boston Globe
Asks”). When confronted by Boston Globe editor Matthew Storin, Barnicle claimed that
he had never read Carlin‟s book, “but had used jokes given him by a friend without
checking their origins,” (Barringer, “Boston Globe Asks”). In response to the infraction,
Storin suspended Barnicle without pay for a month (Barringer, “Boston Globe Asks”).
As news of Barnicle‟s suspension and claims of having never read Carlin‟s book
broke, local station WCVB-TV confirmed a guest appearance by Barnicle on June 22nd.
“Braindroppings” was among them, which Barnicle stated “had a yuck on every page,”
(Barringer, “Boston Globe Asks”). The reference implied that Barnicle had read Carlin‟s
book, which he had denied when accused of plagiarizing the author. In response to the
conflicting information, Globe editors asked for Barnicle‟s resignation, a request with
which he refused to comply. Thus began the first step in Barnicle‟s worming his way out
of trouble. “Barnicle said he… had recommended the book based only on his familiarity
with Mr. Carlin‟s work over the years. [Barnicle] then referred to other recent
Barnicle said, “If we in this business have gotten to the point where… telling
someone else‟s jokes without attribution… can be equated to saying mistakenly that
McCluskey 3
Americans killed other Americans with nerve gas, with making up whole columns… if
we‟ve reached the point in this business where the two are equal, then God help us all,”
(Barringer, “Boston Globe Asks”). Storin, editor of the Globe, subsequently retracted the
said “that his original decision had been hasty and that it was unfair to give [Barnicle] the
same penalty as Ms. Smith [who was charged with fabricating characters and their
stories], since his lapse was so much more marginal than hers,” (Raines). Barnicle
successfully pulled the wool over his editor‟s eyes here. The editor seemed to readily
accept his argument that since his wrong wasn‟t technically as bad as another journalist‟s
wrong, his punishment shouldn‟t rank within the same severity. Barnicle had plagiarized
his only error. Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, a former editor of Reader‟s Digest, first became
aware of one of Barnicle‟s slip ups in 1996. Tomlinson was touched by one of Barnicle‟s
articles, which detailed the relationship of cancer-stricken children who had become
friends while being treated. When the black youth passed away, the family of the white
youth was said to have sent the black youth‟s family a $10,000 check in remembrance
(O‟Brien). The story could not be printed before being confirmed by the Digest‟s fact-
checkers, who could find no evidence of such an occurrence (Barringer, “Boston Globe
Columnist Resigns”). Tomlinson had wanted one of his writers to report on the story, but
couldn‟t generate any enthusiasm for the article. The fabrication fell to the wayside and
Barnicle escaped trouble for the time being. When the plagiarism allegations arose,
Tomlinson was sure Barnicle‟s dishonest career was over. And when it was apparent that
McCluskey 4
Barnicle‟s ethical failures would slip through the cracks yet again, Tomlinson took
action. He contacted Storin regarding the 1996 column. Confronted with another
Prior to his resignation, Barnicle had co-written an article with Peter Maas for
George magazine. Magazine editors had contacted the two journalists to write a story
about the Bulger brothers (Kuzcynski). In light of the allegations against Barnicle, the
article was not published until its facts had been carefully checked. Executive editor
Richard Blow was quoted as saying, “it was worthwhile to take as much time as
necessary to make sure that everything in the article that checked out,” (Kuzcynski).
However, the reasoning behind the fact-checking appeared to be that “Mike Barnicle‟s
ethical problems presented an easy avenue of critique for anyone who didn‟t like the
in fact, Maas had also been involved in ethical scandals. George went on to publish the
article eight months later, and Barnicle‟s actions were without consequence once more.
Despite being aware of the allegations of many ethical infractions, the magazine
employed the journalist, thus degrading the journalism industry as a whole. An ethically
struggling writer wasn‟t punished with the loss of his career as a result of his actions—
The editors of George weren‟t the only ones willing to look past Barnicle‟s
infractions. In a letter to the editor of the New York Times, Barnicle‟s editor defended
him: “Mike Barnicle is human; he made mistakes in those 26 years… and although he
never conceded that he made things up, he paid dearly. Two citations… and the three
million or so words he had written for The Globe over a quarter of a century were
McCluskey 5
devalued, utterly and unfairly,” (Mulvoy). Mulvoy seems to excuse Barnicle‟s behavior
because some of what he wrote happened to be honest and factual. Despite his ethical
mistakes, Barnicle was hired to write for The Daily News and was later hired to write a
column for The Boston Herald. Editor Ken Chandler echoed Mulvoy‟s sentiments,
stating that “the two columns that led to [Barnicle‟s] departure… were not representative
of the nearly 4,000 others he had filed for the newspaper,” (Steinberg). He concluded by
saying, “I think he‟s more than earned his stripes.” This is an absurd statement in a world
in which other journalists who have committed ethical infractions are shunned from other
organizations.
The open-armed acceptance that has greeted Barnicle after his ethical infractions
degrade the world of journalism. The man who once claimed that he should be given a
pass because his actions weren‟t comparable to fabricating a story truly made a mockery
of journalism, for he was later accused of doing just that in the cancer patient story.
Furthermore, Barnicle has continued to take stabs at the industry when speaking in his
defense. “The rules were much looser [in the early years of his column]. You could get
by with giving them a nickname. You didn‟t have to give their shoe size, their hair color.
I am now going to provide people‟s Social Security numbers in the paper next to their
names,” he said (Steinberg). The man has gotten away with the equivalent of murder in
the world of journalism, and makes a mockery of everything the industry stands for.
Works Cited
Barringer, Felicity. “Boston Globe Asks a Columnist to Resign.” New York Times.
6 Aug. 1998. 20 Feb. 2010. <http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/06/us/
McCluskey 6
boston-globe-asks-a-columnist-to-resign.html>.
Barringer, Felicity. “Boston Globe Columnist Resigns Over Authenticity of 1995 Story.”
New York Times. 20 Aug. 1998. 20 Feb. 2010.
<http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/20/us/
boston-globe-columnist-resigns-over-authenticity-of-1995-
story.html?pagewanted=1>.
Barringer, Felicity. “Standoff Between Boston Globe and Its Star Columnist Provokes
Turmoil in Newsroom.” New York Times. 7 Aug. 1998. 20 Feb. 2010.
<http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/07/us/
standoff-between-boston-globe-its-star-columnist-provokes-turmoil-
newsroom.html?pagewanted=1>.
Mulvoy, Thomas F. Jr. “A Journalist‟s Mistakes.” New York Times. 29 May 2003.
20 Feb. 2010. <http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/29/opinion/
l-a-journalist-s-mistakes-881910.html>.
Raines, Howell. “Editorial Observer; The High Price of Reprieving Mike Barnicle.”
New York Times. 13 Aug. 1998. 20 Feb. 2010.
<http://www.nytimes.com/1998/08/13/opinion/
editorial-observer-the-high-price-of-reprieving-mike-barnicle.html>.
Wiley, Ralph. “Boston Globe and Double Standard: A Tale of Affirmative Action.”
Find Articles. September 1998. 20 Feb. 2010.
<http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3812/is_199809/ai_n8814956>.