Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Page
Front Page ………………………………………………………………………... 1
Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………… 2
I STYLE REQUIREMENTS……………………………………………… 3
General Document Guidelines ……………………………………………. 3
Title Page …………………………………………………………………. 4
Approval Form ……………………………………………………………. 4
Abstract …………………………………………………………………… 4
Acknowledgment/Dedication …………………………………………….. 5
Table of Contents/ List of Tables/List of Figures/Plates …………………. 5
Body …………………………………………………………………….. 5
Definition of Terms ……………………………………………………… 5
Bibliography …………………………………………………………….. 6
Appendices ………………………………………………………………. 6
Tables ……………………………………………………………………... 6
Figures and Plates ……………………………………………………….. 7
II CONTENT REQUIREMENTS ……………………………………….. 8
Abstract ………………………………………………………………….. 8
Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 8
Review of Literature ……………………………………………………… 10
Methodology……………………………………………………………… 10
Discussion of Findings……………………………………………………. 11
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations ………………………….. 12
Bibliography ……………………………………………………………… 12
Text Citations ……………………………………………………………. 14
Quotations ………………………………………………………………… 16
III RESEARCH POLICIES AND GUIDELINES ……………………….. 17
Specific Functions ………………………………………………………… 17
Oral Examination Fee ……………………………………………………. 20
Remuneration of the Members of the Oral Examination Committee …… 20
Implementation of Research ……………………………………………… 20
Ethical Standards …………………………………………………………. 22
Research Evaluation ……………………………………………………… 24
Citation …………………………………………………………………… 24
IV UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH FLOWCHARTS ……………… 26
V SAMPLE FORMATS AND FORMS ………………………………… 28
3
I. STYLE REQUIREMENTS
Margins One (1) inch on the bottom and right sides, and 1.5” on the
upper and left sides.
Font Size and Style Font style is Times New Roman with a font size of twelve
(12) points
Manuscript Header CDD letterhead should be used for the Approval Form and
transmittal letters, while the header of the college/
department shall be used on the other parts of the
document, if available.
Active/Passive voice Active voice, third person must be used. For example,
use "The researchers predicted that ..."
Cover Page All capital letters and bold. This contains the title,
researchers, degree program, and the month and year.
Arrange alphabetically the name of researchers based on
the surnames. The name of the leader should appear first.
4
The color of the hardbound should be: green for CON; blue
for CASED; orange for COE; grey for CICS; and yellow
for CBA.
Side Label Title Case, bold letters. This contains the name of the
leader (for group) with “et al.”, title of research, and the
month and year of submission.
Title Page
Researcher(s) Title case, bold letters, centered on the line following the
paper title, alphabetically arranged according to family
names, however, name of the leader should be written first.
Date Includes month and year, written in title case, bold letters,
centered.
Approval Form
(see sample format)
Abstract
Body
Description The body of the paper begins on a new page (after the
preliminaries). Subsections of the body of the paper do
not begin on new pages.
Title Chapter number is written in Arabic format (Chapter 1,
Chapter 2…). The title is written in title case and bold
letters. The chapter heading, for example
INTRODUCTION for Chapter 1, is written in uppercase
and bold letters centered on the first line below the
manuscript header.
Headings Headings are used to organize the document and reflect the
relative importance of sections. Some sections may have
subsections/subheadings. The following formats shall be
used:
Definition of Terms This is last part of the INTRODUCTION. The terms must
be written in title case and bold. A period follows after the
term. The definitions (with hanging indent) begin on the
line following its heading. Entries are organized
alphabetically.
Bibliography
Appendices
Tables
A common use of tables is to present quantitative data or the results of statistical
analyses. This is presented before the discussion of data.
Heading Table 1 (or 2 or 3, etc.) is aligned left just above the table
referred followed by the table title written in title case and
italics.
Numbering Continuous
Continuation The table may be continued to next page but should carry
the table number, the word “continued”, and an ellipsis in
its heading (Table 1 continued…)
7
Figures/Plates
Numbering Continuous
8
II.CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
Abstract
This part is a summary of the most important elements of the paper. This should
summarize the problem, methodology, results/findings and conclusions.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
This part gives the readers an overview of what the research is all about,
describing the problem situation in light of global, national and local forces. It justifies
the existence of the problem situation by citing statistical data and authoritative sources.
This part should likewise include the reasons on why the researcher/s had selected the
research topic and explains its importance. At least, five (5) references should be used.
Further, a clinching statement that will relate the background of the research problem
should be included.
Theoretical Framework
This part discusses the theories and/or concepts which are useful in
conceptualizing the research. This part may be omitted if theories are not available.
Conceptual Framework
This part identifies and discusses the variables related to the problem. A
schematic diagram of the research is presented including the discussion of the
relationships of the different elements/variables involved in the study.
This part presents the statement of the main problem usually in declarative form.
The main problem generally reflects the title of the research and its objectives. It should
be stated in a way that it is not answerable by yes or no and not indicative of when and
where. Rather, it should reflect relationships/differences between and among variables.
This part also includes the sub-problems or the research questions that are to be
answered specifically. These are stated as questions. The essential characteristic of a
research question is that there should be some information that can be collected in an
attempt to answer it. Moreover, the sub-problems should be arranged in a logical order
from actual to analytical following the flow in the research paradigm.
9
Hypotheses (optional)
The part states tentative answers to research questions. The hypothesis should be
measurable and desirable, expressing expected relationship between/among two or more
variables. It should be based on the theory and/or empirical evidence. It is a prediction of
some sort regarding the possible outcomes of a study.
Assumptions (optional)
The part is a statement of things that are presumed to be true during the conduct
of the study. It should be noted that these assumptions need not be proven unlike the
hypothesis. It should likewise be based on the general and specific problems and be
stated in simple, brief, generally accepted statement.
The part should clearly state the importance/ usefulness of the research to
different specific groups (community, school, respondents, college, department, students,
and researchers), education, research and practice.
This part mentions the areas that will be included and excluded in the research, its
boundaries and constraints. It should indicate the principal variable, locale, timeframe
and justification.
Definition of Terms
This part defines the important terms taken from the title and statement of the
problem. The terms should be arranged alphabetically and defined in two common ways:
the dictionary-type definitions and the operational definitions. The latter is preferred. It
should define the terms according to how it was used in the study with hanging indent
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This includes the related literatures and studies from both foreign and local
sources. It is arranged and synthesized thematically to conform to the specific problems.
It synthesizes evidences from all the literatures reviewed to get an overall understanding
of the state of knowledge in the research problem. As much as possible, the reviewed
literatures are limited to those published within the last 10 years (with at least 10
references).
A clinching statement showing how the related literatures had assisted the
researchers in the present study should be written in the last part.
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This specifies, describes, and justifies the appropriateness of the research design
used in the study.
Sources of Data
This describes the locale of the study (place where the study was conducted) and
the rationale of its choice. It should likewise describe the research population and the
sampling methods or techniques used in determining the respondents or subjects of the
study.
This part should describe the instrument, what it measured, how it was
interpreted, to whom it was administered, and if it is necessary, how it was administered.
A description of the instrument or parts of the instrument used is included.
Further, it mentions the type of instruments used in the study, such as the rating
scales, interview schedules, tally sheet, performance checklist, documents and others.
If the instrument used to gather data is made by the researcher, the test conducted
to ensure the instruments’ (usually the questionnaires) validity and reliability should be
stated. The level of reliability (probability) should be stated. At least five (5) experts on
the field being studied should have evaluated the instrument.
This presents the statistical tools or treatment employed in the analysis and
interpretation of the collected data. The tools used for data analysis for each of the
problems should be described.
Chapter 4
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Data Presentation
This is presented based on the specific problems posited in the study. The data are
presented in tabular or graphical and textual form. The data should likewise be presented
from general to particular, macro to micro or vice versa.
Data Analysis
Table reading should be avoided in the analysis of the results presented in tabular
format.
Data Interpretation
Chapter 5
Summary
This includes a brief statement of the research objectives, the research problems,
the research methodology and the major findings of the study.
The problems are stated in paragraph form. The major findings for each of the
problems raised are presented, excluding figures and implications. The result of the tested
hypothesis is also presented including the level of confidence or significance.
Conclusions
These are brief, generalized statements deduced from the findings to answer the
general and sub-problems. These contain generalizations applicable to the population.
These are clearly aligned to the research problem, briefly worded directly
answering, in sequential order the research problems, exclusively derived from the
significant findings, not merely restatement of the findings, and free from any misleading
impression, bias or unfair and incorrect generalizations.
Recommendations
These are worthy or acceptable and relevant suggestions that offer solution to the
problems or issues presented in the study, based on the conclusions.
Bibliography
This includes all materials used and reviewed by the researcher arranged
according to type, e.g. book, journal article, unpublished materials, and web documents.
Citation with reference to APA (American Psychological Association) format shall be
used.
1. Authors: Authors are listed in the same order as specified in the source, using
surnames and initials. Commas separate all authors. When there are seven or more
authors, list the first six and then use "et al." for remaining authors. If no author is
identified, the title of the document begins the reference.
2. Year of Publication: In parentheses following authors, with a period following the
closing parenthesis. If no publication date is identified, use "n.d." in parentheses
following the authors.
3. Source Reference: Includes title, journal, volume, pages (for journal article) or
title, city of publication, publisher (for book). Italicize titles of books, titles of
periodicals, and periodical volume numbers.
Examples of sources
1. Journal article
Murzynski, J., & Degelman, D. (1996). Body language of women and judgments
of vulnerability to sexual assault. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
26, 1617-1626.
2. Book
Paloutzian, R. F. (1996). Invitation to the psychology of religion (2nd ed.).
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Web document on university program or department Web site
Degelman, D., & Harris, M. L. (2000). APA style essentials. Retrieved May 18,
2000, from Vanguard University, Department of Psychology
Website:http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/ddegelman/index.aspx?
doc_id=796
4. Stand-alone Web document (no date)
Nielsen, M.E. (n.d.). Notable people in psychology of religion. Retrieved August
3, 2001, from http://www.psywww.com/psyrelig/psyrelpr.htm
5. Stand-alone Web document (no author, no date)
Gender and society. (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2001, from
http://www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/gender.html
6. Journal article from database
Hien, D., & Honeyman, T. (2000). A closer look at the drug abuse-maternal
aggression link. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 503-522. Retrieved
May 20, 2000, from ProQuest database.
7. Abstract from secondary database
Garrity, K., & Degelman, D. (1990). Effect of server introduction on restaurant
tipping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 168-172. Abstract
retrieved July 23, 2001, from PsycINFO database.
8. Journal article, Internet-only journal
Bergen, D. (2002, Spring). The role of pretend play in children's cognitive
development. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(1). Retrieved
February 1, 2004, from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/bergen.html
14
Appendices
Text Citations
Source material must be documented in the body of the paper by citing the
author(s) and date(s) of the sources. The underlying principle is that ideas and words of
others must be formally acknowledged. The reader can obtain the full source citation
from the list of references that follows the body of the paper.
A. When the names of the authors of a source are part of the formal structure of the
sentence, the year of publication appears in parentheses following the
identification of the authors. Consider the following example:
Wirth and Mitchell (1994) found that although there was a reduction in
insulin dosage over a period of two weeks in the treatment condition
compared to the control condition, the difference was not statistically
significant. [Note: “and” should be used when multiple authors are
identified as part of the formal structure of the sentence. Compare this to the
example in the following section.]
B. When the authors of a source are not part of the formal structure of the sentence,
both the authors and year of publication appear in parentheses. Consider the
following example:
Reviews of research on religion and health have concluded that at least some
types of religious behaviors are related to higher levels of physical and
mental health (Gartner, Larson, & Allen, 1991; Koenig, 1990; Levin &
Vanderpool, 1991; Maton & Pargament, 1987; Paloma & Pendleton, 1991;
Payne, Bergin, Bielema, & Jenkins, 1991). [Note: “&” should be used
when multiple authors are identified in parenthetical material. Note also that
when several sources are cited parenthetically, they are ordered
alphabetically by first authors' surnames and separated by semicolons.]
C. When a source that has two authors is cited, both authors should be included
every time the source is cited.
15
D. When a source that has three, four, or five authors is cited, all authors are included
the first time the source is cited. When that source is cited again, the first author's
surname and "et al." should be used. Consider the following example:
Reviews of research on religion and health have concluded that at least some
types of religious behaviors are related to higher levels of physical and
mental health (Payne, Bergin, Bielema, & Jenkins, 1991).
Payne et al. (1991) showed that...
E. When a source that has six or more authors is cited, the first author's surname and
"et al." should be used every time the source is cited (including the first time).
F. Every effort should be made to cite only sources that have been actually read.
When it is necessary to cite a source that have not read ("Grayson" in the
following example) that is cited in a source that have read ("Murzynski &
Degelman" in the following example), use the following format for the text
citation and list only the source have read in the References list:
Grayson (as cited in Murzynski & Degelman, 1996) identified four
components of body language that were related to judgments of
vulnerability.
I. To cite the Bible, provide the book, chapter, and verse. The first time the Bible is
cited in the text, identify the version used. Consider the following example:
"You are forgiving and good, O Lord, abounding in love to all who call to
you" (Psalm 86:5, New International Version). [Note: No entry in the
References list is needed for the Bible.]
16
Quotations
When a direct quotation is used, always include the author, year, and page number
as part of the citation.
1. Specific Functions
1.1.7 set definite time frames and deadlines for the construction of different
parts of the research manuscript;
1.1.13 ascertain that final copies of the research manuscript are in conformity
with the content and style requirements found in this manual;
1.2 Student-Researcher/s
Within the time allotted for the completion of the research work, the student-
researcher/s should be able to:
1.2.1 submit research titles for approval of the research instructor/adviser and
for preliminary evaluation of the research adviser;
1.2.2 work closely with the research instructor and adviser for approval of the
research proposal;
1.2.3 choose a research adviser, other than the research instructor, from the
college or department’s pool of advisers;
1.2.5 provide oral or written updates of the research to the research adviser;
1.2.6 coordinate with the research unit for oral examination scheduling;
1.2.7 document and receive comments and suggestions from the Oral
Examination Committee;
1.2.8 revise final manuscript based on the comments and suggestions from the
Oral Examination Committee; and
1.2.9 submit three (3) copies of the hardbound research manuscript, (two (2) for
the Library, and one (1) for the department/college, and a soft copy (CD)
of the manuscript and an abstract (printed in the Colegio de Dagupan
letterhead) to the Research Unit.
19
Within the time allotted for the completion of the research work, the research unit
should be able to:
1.3.4 ensure that comments and suggestions are documented and received by
the research adviser and student-researchers, respectively;
Within the time allotted for the completion of the research work, the
dean/department head should be able to:
1.4.1 examine and endorse student-researcher/s to the research unit for oral
examination schedule;
1.4.2 approve final research manuscripts after corrections have been integrated
by the student-researcher/s; and
The committee shall be composed of the Dean /Department Head, technical panel
and research unit representative.
1.5.1 the Dean/Department Head acts as the chairman of the committee, but
may assign other faculty members in his/her behalf;
1.5.2 the technical panel representative, who is a faculty member of the student-
researcher/s’ College or Department, evaluates the theoretical and content
integrity of the research and suggests other materials to improve the
manuscript;
1.5.3 the research unit representative checks the research as to the content and
style requirements found in this manual; and
The oral examination fee shall be appropriated for the remuneration of the oral
examination committee members and for the development of the research and extension
services. The Dean/Department Head shall process the appropriation and distribution of
the remuneration with the Finance Office.
4. Implementation of Research
The choice of a good title is a demanding but challenging search for a field of
inquiry closely related to the student-researcher/s’ expertise and interest.
21
The title should be reflective of the general problem that must be concise,
preferably not more than 10 substantive words or two lines using the inverted pyramid
format. Further, starter phrases such as “a study of …,” “an evaluation of …,” or “an
assessment of …,” should be avoided.
The chosen research problem should be Specific, Measurable, Achievable,
Realistic and Time-bound (SMART) that it can be adequately and feasibly undertaken
within the time frame of the research.
Upon the approval of the title by the research instructor/adviser, the student-
researcher/s shall commence structuring a research proposal containing the first three
chapters of the research, including a sample of the instruments to be employed.
The research proposal shall then be evaluated by the oral examination committee
in terms of mechanics, organization and content.
After the evaluation and approval of the revised research proposal by the oral
examination committee, as evidenced by a duly signed approval form, the student-
researcher/s shall then proceed to the research execution.
The student-researcher/s shall include all information based on the content and
style provided in this manual. It should be submitted to the research instructor/adviser for
the evaluation of mechanics, organization and contents.
The research adviser shall endorse the research manuscript to the dean, who will
thereafter endorse it to the research unit using an endorsement form. The student-
researcher/s will then be scheduled for oral examination upon presentation of the
endorsement form signed by the dean. The research will be examined using the
evaluation form. Comments and suggestions of the oral examination committee members
shall be documented and received by the research adviser and student-researcher/s,
respectively.
Research defense should be held at the Defense Room beside the Research Unit
and Graduate School Library located at the ground floor, Library Building, if available.
Reservations should be made with the research unit three (3) working days prior to the
defense.
22
A copy of the final research manuscript shall be evaluated by the oral examination
committee. Upon its approval, it shall then be replicated and hardbound. The student-
researcher/s shall submit three (3) copies of the hardbound research manuscript to the
following: (two (2) for the Library; and one (1) for the department/college, and a soft
copy (CD) of the manuscript and an abstract (printed in the Colegio de Dagupan
letterhead) to the Research Unit.
5. Ethical Standards
5.1 Offenses
5.1.1 Plagiarism
The practice of plagiarism is a form of academic high treason undermining the
entire scholarly enterprise. Academic plagiarism is the deliberate attempt to deceive the
reader through the appropriation and representation as one's own the works and words of
others. This happens when a writer repeatedly uses more than four words from a printed
source without the use of quotation marks and a precise reference to the original source.
Some of these plagiarism are:
and where the paraphrasing is limited to material that is then discussed, explained, and
argued about.
Thus, quotation marks must be used for any passage copied from another work
containing five or more words. To know how to cite works and use quotations correctly,
please see the page regarding it on this manual.
Change or manipulate the method of data collection before the end of the
data collection period, unless a full account is provided in the final report
Change or omit data that have been collected
Add data collected outside the data collection period
Add fictitious data
Or otherwise misrepresent the true results of the data collected.
5.2 Procedures for Dealing with These Offenses
5.3 Consequences
Attempts to plagiarize and make data fit a particular theory or preferred outcome
contravene the basic principles of academic integrity, hence, severe penalties will be
given to research instructors/advisers and student-researchers.
5.3.1 Student-Researchers
6. Research Evaluation
The candidates’ ability to defend the research is based on their mastery of the
research content, knowledge of the problem area, clarity and comprehensiveness of
presentation ability to orally communicate answers to questions, ability to keep
discussions on the main issues and ability to demonstrate a professional attitude towards
suggestions and revisions. (see sample format)
7. Citation
7.1 Award
7.2 Publication
25
The college shall recognize exemplary research outputs through its publication.
The exemplary researches approved by the president will be published in the school’s
research journal.
Final Research
1. ENDORSEMENT BY THE ADVISER
The research adviser endorses the completed research to the dean/department head for comments
and suggestions.
3. SCHEDULING OF DEFENSE
The research unit issues a schedule form to the student-researcher for final oral examination upon
presentation of the endorsement form.
BAYANI, KENETH G.
MUNAR, EMELY A.
VERGONIA, MARIVIC C.
(All capital and bold letters, centered)
(Alphabetically arranged accdg to Family Names)
OCTOBER 2008
(All capital and bold letters, centered)
Title Page
Training Practices of Selected Regional and National Businesses
with Operations in Dagupan City
(Title case, bold letters, centered, inverted pyramid)
29
Bayani, Keneth G.
Munar, Emely A.
Vergonia, Marivic C.
(Title case, bold letters, centered, and alphabetically arranged
according to Family Names)
October 2008
Title case, bold letters, centered)
30
Proposal
Approval Form
(3 spaces)
________________________________
Research Adviser
________________________________
Chairman
____________________________ ___________________________
Member Member
Noted:
_______________________________
Dean
31
Completed
Approval Form
(3 spaces)
_________________________
Research Adviser
________________________________
Chairman
___________________________ ___________________________
Member Member
________________________________
Dean
32
Abstract
(3 spaces)
Acknowledgment
(3 spaces)
The researchers wish to express their profound gratitude to the following who in
one way or the other have contributed to the success of this study.
To the almighty God for His eternal love, blessings and guidance, and the
wisdom He has given us;
The Researcher(s)
34
Table of Contents
(3 spaces)
35
Page
Title Page…………………………………………………………………..……… i
Approval Form…………………………………………………………………… ii
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………...... iii
Acknowledgment……………...…………………………………………………. iv
Dedication (optional)……………………………………………………………… v
Table of Contents…………………………………………….…………………… vi
List of Tables……………………………………………………………..………. viii
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………….. ix
Chapter
1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….. 1
Background of the Study…………………………………………………... 1
Theoretical Framework …………………………………………………… 6
Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………..... 8
Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………. 13
Hypothesis/es……………………………………………………………… 15
Assumptions (Optional)…………………………………………………… 15
Significance of the Study…………………………………………………. 16
Scope and Limitations……………………………………………………. 16
Definition of Terms……………………………………………………….. 17
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND STUDIES ….………………….. 20
3 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………….. 91
Research Design……………………………....…………………………. 91
Sources of Data………………………………………………………….. 91
Instrumentation and Data Collection……....……………………………. 93
Tools for Data Analysis ……………………….….……………………… 94
4 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS…………………………………………. 96
5 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…….. 171
Summary …………………………………………………………………. 171
Conclusions…………………………………….………………………….. 173
Recommendations……………………….…………………....................... 174
Bibliography …………………………………………………………………….. 175
Appendices ……………………………………………………………………….. 178
A Transmittal Letters ……………………………………………………….. 178
B Letter to the Respondents ………………………………………………… 179
C Sample Computations ……………………………………………………. 180
Curriculum Vitae ……………………………………………………………… 185
36
List of Tables
(3 spaces)
List of Figures
(3 spaces)
Figure Title Page
1 <Title of Table 1> 7
2 <Title of Table 2> 15
3 <Title of Table 3> 98
38
Proposal
_____________________________
Research Adviser
Approved:
_______________________________
Dean
Completed
ENDORSEMENT FOR ORAL EXAMINATION
_____________________________
Research Adviser
Approved:
_______________________________
Dean
39
Proposal
ORAL EXAMINATION SCHEDULE FORM
________________________________
Signature over Printed Name
Completed
ORAL EXAMINATION SCHEDULE FORM
______________
_________________
Signature over Printed Name
40
EVALUATION FORM
Name of Researcher/s : ____________________________________________________
Degree Program : ____________________________________________________
Date of Defense : ____________________________________________________
Research Title : ____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Directions: Please check (/) the number that corresponds to your rating in the
number/line for each item; 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest.
CRITERIA 1 2 3 4 5
1. Mechanics (5%)
a. General Appearance, including encoding
b. Sentence Structure
c. Semantics/ Rhetoric
d. Referencing/Bibliographic Entries/Appendices
2. Organization (15%)
a. Coherence and consistency (unity of ideas)
b. Clarity (clearness of expression)
c. Emphasis
d. Unity of Structure
(from presentation, interpretation to conclusion)
e. Logical Presentation of the Research
3. Quality of Research Content (30%)
a. Originality
b. Appropriateness of the Presentation Media Used
c. Relevance of the Study
d. Appropriateness of Statistical Treatment
e. Soundness and depth of Findings’ Interpretation
f. Relevance of Conclusions and Recommendations
g. Objectivity in Presentation
4. Researcher’s Ability to Defend the Research (50%)
a. Mastery on the Research Content (10%)
b. Knowledge of the Problem Area and Allied Fields (5%)
c. Clarity and Comprehensiveness of Presentation (10%)
d. Ability to Orally Communicate Answers to Questions (10%)
e. Ability to Keep Discussions on the Main Issues (5%)
e. Ability to Demonstrate a Professional Attitude towards
suggestions and revisions (10%)
TOTAL
______________
N.B. The researcher has to achieve 75% to pass the oral examination.
Signature Date
DEAN - one (1) hardbound copy
________________
_
Date
To the Cashier
_________________________
Signature over Printed Name