Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Visual Relationships between Classical and Supersymmetric Adinkra Symbols

    Uploaded by

    Toyin Adepoju
    345 views2 pages
    Physicists Michael Faux and Sylvester James Gates and their collaborators have developed "Adinkras" which they describe as a "graphical technology for supersymmetric representation theory". They name this visual technology Adinkrammatics. Their work is in supersymmetry, a field in physics. I encountered their work in the course of a search on the older classical Adinkra corpus of visual symbols developed by the Gyaman of Cote d'Ivoire and the Akan of Ghana. I came across Faux and Gates paper introducing their symbol system “Adinkras: A Graphical Technology for Supersymmetric Representation Theory” published in Physical Review D, vol. 71, Issue 6, id. 065002( 2004). There, they describe the role of visual imagery in physics and explain their decision to name their system after the Akan/Gayam Adinkra symbol corpus: "There are important examples in which theoretical physics incorporates elegant motifs to represent mathematical conceptions that are vastly simplified thereby.One such example is the wide-spread use of Feynman diagrams. Another one of these is Salam-Strathdee superspace, a stalwart construction which has proven most helpful in organizing fundamental notions in field theory and in string theory... In this paper, we introduce a graphical paradigm which shows some promise in providing a new symbolic technology for usefully re-conceptualizing problems in supersymmetric representation theory. The use of symbols to connote ideas which defy simple verbalization is perhaps one of the oldest of human traditions. The Asante people of West Africa have long been accustomed to using simple yet elegant motifs known as Adinkra symbols, to serve just this purpose. With a nod to this tradition, we christen our graphical symbols as “Adinkras.” I deeply admire the visual elegance of their work even though I dont understand most of what it means. I am puzzled, however, by the visual similarities between their work and the older Akan/Gyaman Adinkra system. These similarities emerge from the exact visual identity between one of their symbols and the older Adinkra symbol of Eban and less precise but close similarities between one of their symbols and the Akan/Gyman Adinkra symbol of Epa and inexact but suggestive relationships between another symbol of theirs and the older Adinkra symbol of Nyansapon. I find these similarities puzzling because both Faux and Gates have insisted, in my correspondence with them, that their work is uninfluenced by the older Gyaman/Akan Adinkra system. A depiction of the visual similarities between the two systems along with the Faux and Gates paper, are attached to this post. Ever since I came across these similarities between 2007 and 2008, I have had an ambivalent relationship with these correlations even though they fascinate me, inspiring me to explore the possibilities they suggest of dialogue between the ancient and the new systems as well as the mathematical and other cognitive possibilities of classical Adinkra. These explorations of mine are described in my essay on Adinkra in the Oxford Encyclopedia of African Thought edited by Abiola Irele and Biodun Jeyifo. Seeing a description of the Adinkra symbolism in physics on the Wikipedia site on Adinkra spurred me to post this description of my puzzlement, freeing me from the ambivalence I feel towards these similarities between both systems, and facilitating my emotional freedom to post later my explorations of the mutual illumination between classical and supersymmetric Adinkra. Thanks Toyin Adepoju

    Original Title

    Classical and Super Symmetric Adinkra Visual Correlations

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Physicists Michael Faux and Sylvester James Gates and their collaborators have developed "Adinkras" which they describe as a "graphical technology for supersymmetric representation theory". They name this visual technology Adinkrammatics. Their work is in supersymmetry, a field in physics. I encountered their work in the course of a search on the older classical Adinkra corpus of visual symbols developed by the Gyaman of Cote d'Ivoire and the Akan of Ghana. I came across Faux and Gates paper introducing their symbol system “Adinkras: A Graphical Technology for Supersymmetric Representation Theory” published in Physical Review D, vol. 71, Issue 6, id. 065002( 2004). There, they describe the role of visual imagery in physics and explain their decision to name their system after the Akan/Gayam Adinkra symbol corpus: "There are important examples in which theoretical physics incorporates elegant motifs to represent mathematical conceptions that are vastly simplified thereby.One such example is the wide-spread use of Feynman diagrams. Another one of these is Salam-Strathdee superspace, a stalwart construction which has proven most helpful in organizing fundamental notions in field theory and in string theory... In this paper, we introduce a graphical paradigm which shows some promise in providing a new symbolic technology for usefully re-conceptualizing problems in supersymmetric representation theory. The use of symbols to connote ideas which defy simple verbalization is perhaps one of the oldest of human traditions. The Asante people of West Africa have long been accustomed to using simple yet elegant motifs known as Adinkra symbols, to serve just this purpose. With a nod to this tradition, we christen our graphical symbols as “Adinkras.” I deeply admire the visual elegance of their work even though I dont understand most of what it means. I am puzzled, however, by the visual similarities between their work and the older Akan/Gyaman Adinkra system. These similarities emerge from the exact visual identity between one of their symbols and the older Adinkra symbol of Eban and less precise but close similarities between one of their symbols and the Akan/Gyman Adinkra symbol of Epa and inexact but suggestive relationships between another symbol of theirs and the older Adinkra symbol of Nyansapon. I find these similarities puzzling because both Faux and Gates have insisted, in my correspondence with them, that their work is uninfluenced by the older Gyaman/Akan Adinkra system. A depiction of the visual similarities between the two systems along with the Faux and Gates paper, are attached to this post. Ever since I came across these similarities between 2007 and 2008, I have had an ambivalent relationship with these correlations even though they fascinate me, inspiring me to explore the possibilities they suggest of dialogue between the ancient and the new systems as well as the mathematical and other cognitive possibilities of classical Adinkra. These explorations of mine are described in my essay on Adinkra in the Oxford Encyclopedia of African Thought edited by Abiola Irele and Biodun Jeyifo. Seeing a description of the Adinkra symbolism in physics on the Wikipedia site on Adinkra spurred me to post this description of my puzzlement, freeing me from the ambivalence I feel towards these similarities between both systems, and facilitating my emotional freedom to post later my explorations of the mutual illumination between classical and supersymmetric Adinkra. Thanks Toyin Adepoju

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    345 views2 pages

    Visual Relationships between Classical and Supersymmetric Adinkra Symbols

    Uploaded by

    Toyin Adepoju
    Physicists Michael Faux and Sylvester James Gates and their collaborators have developed "Adinkras" which they describe as a "graphical technology for supersymmetric representation theory". They name this visual technology Adinkrammatics. Their work is in supersymmetry, a field in physics. I encountered their work in the course of a search on the older classical Adinkra corpus of visual symbols developed by the Gyaman of Cote d'Ivoire and the Akan of Ghana. I came across Faux and Gates paper introducing their symbol system “Adinkras: A Graphical Technology for Supersymmetric Representation Theory” published in Physical Review D, vol. 71, Issue 6, id. 065002( 2004). There, they describe the role of visual imagery in physics and explain their decision to name their system after the Akan/Gayam Adinkra symbol corpus: "There are important examples in which theoretical physics incorporates elegant motifs to represent mathematical conceptions that are vastly simplified thereby.One such example is the wide-spread use of Feynman diagrams. Another one of these is Salam-Strathdee superspace, a stalwart construction which has proven most helpful in organizing fundamental notions in field theory and in string theory... In this paper, we introduce a graphical paradigm which shows some promise in providing a new symbolic technology for usefully re-conceptualizing problems in supersymmetric representation theory. The use of symbols to connote ideas which defy simple verbalization is perhaps one of the oldest of human traditions. The Asante people of West Africa have long been accustomed to using simple yet elegant motifs known as Adinkra symbols, to serve just this purpose. With a nod to this tradition, we christen our graphical symbols as “Adinkras.” I deeply admire the visual elegance of their work even though I dont understand most of what it means. I am puzzled, however, by the visual similarities between their work and the older Akan/Gyaman Adinkra system. These similarities emerge from the exact visual identity between one of their symbols and the older Adinkra symbol of Eban and less precise but close similarities between one of their symbols and the Akan/Gyman Adinkra symbol of Epa and inexact but suggestive relationships between another symbol of theirs and the older Adinkra symbol of Nyansapon. I find these similarities puzzling because both Faux and Gates have insisted, in my correspondence with them, that their work is uninfluenced by the older Gyaman/Akan Adinkra system. A depiction of the visual similarities between the two systems along with the Faux and Gates paper, are attached to this post. Ever since I came across these similarities between 2007 and 2008, I have had an ambivalent relationship with these correlations even though they fascinate me, inspiring me to explore the possibilities they suggest of dialogue between the ancient and the new systems as well as the mathematical and other cognitive possibilities of classical Adinkra. These explorations of mine are described in my essay on Adinkra in the Oxford Encyclopedia of African Thought edited by Abiola Irele and Biodun Jeyifo. Seeing a description of the Adinkra symbolism in physics on the Wikipedia site on Adinkra spurred me to post this description of my puzzlement, freeing me from the ambivalence I feel towards these similarities between both systems, and facilitating my emotional freedom to post later my explorations of the mutual illumination between classical and supersymmetric Adinkra. Thanks Toyin Adepoju

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju Compcros Comparative Cognitive Processes and Systems Exploring Every Corner of the Cosmos in Search

    of Knowledge

    RELATIONSHIPS OF VISUAL IDENTITY BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND SUPERSYMMETRIC ADINKRA

    EXACT VISUAL IDENTITY


    Supersymmetric Adinkra images
    Classic al Adinkra image

    EBAN

    INEXACT BUT SUGGESTIVE VISUAL RELATIONSHIPS

    Supersymmetric Adinkra image

    Classic al Adinkra image

    EPA

    Faux and Gates diagrams interpret the symmetry of visual forms correlative with those of Classical Adinkra symbols in terms of mathematical ideas relating to supermmetry. Each vertex in these symbols are accorded values represented by the numbers at each point. The visual technology of Supersymmetric Adinkra is developed through the modification and expansion of its basic depiction of elementary particles and their relations in terms of black and white circles linked by arrows into more complex structures that indicate the full range of representations of supersymmetry that theory develops. This progressive development of visual forms emerges into forms that bear either some similarity to those of Classical Adinkra, as with Epa or an exact identity with them, as with Eban. Their work could be related to an adaptation of the visual grammar of Classical Adinkra, a distillation and application of its spatial morphology of lines, circles, angles and triangles, interpreting the resulting transformations in terms of numerical relationships.

    CONVERGENCES BETWEEN VISUAL PHILOSOPHIES DEMONSTRATED BY CLASSICAL AND SUPERSYMMETRIC ADINKRA

    Supersymmetric Adinkra images

    Classical Adinkra image NYANSAPON

    Relationships between fermions- circles- with bosons- circles

    The progressive development of the most basic visual forms in Supersymmetric Adinkra, the symbols indicating fermions, bosons and their relationships in terms of white and black circles connected by arrows, suggests a deconstruction of the structure of the Classical Adinkra symbol of Nyansapon, which consists of gracefully interlocking semi circles and lines, by unknotting its constituent forms to arrive at underlying structures, a process that suggests the cognitive skills represented by the knotting and unknotting of a knot, as evoked by the wisdom knot of Nyansapon.

    Supersymmetric Adinkra images

    Classic al Adinkra images

    EPA

    EBAN

    Faux and Gates also explicitly correlate their own diagrams with methods of visualisation, exemplified by Adinkra, which integrate and transcend verbal exposition, thereby highlighting the character of Adinkra as sources of multivalent cognitive possibilities. They could be understood as suggesting that the evocative power of Adinkra forms facilitates a penetration into the heart of human cognitive abilities, evoking the visceral character, strength, reach and architectonic force suggested by the spider spinning its web from within itself, enabling an ideational elaboration that is potentially infinite in its possibilities.

    You might also like