Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scale Description
Prepared by:
Reference: Tolan, P.H., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D.B. (2001). Chicago Youth
Development Study Family Relationship Measure Scale Description. Families and
Communities Research Group, Institute for Juvenile Research, Department of Psychiatry,
The University of Illinois at Chicago.
The Family Relationship Measure (Tolan, Gorman-Smith, Huesmann, & Zelli, 1997) is a
35-item, multiple informant rating scale assessing dimensions of family functioning and beliefs.
The measure was developed for use with low-income, urban families; however, as a predictor of
psychopathology, relations vary little by age, ethnicity, marital status of parent, or family income.
The Family Relationship Measure uses 5-point Likert scales to assess how true a
respondent feels an item is for his or her family. A multiple informant procedure is used to create
composite scores based on responses from children and parents. Either a computerized interview
The measure is composed of six subscales: Cohesion, Beliefs About Family, Deviant
Beliefs, Organization, Support, and Communication. From these scales, three higher-order
factors are generated: Cohesion, Structure, and Beliefs. The six domains and three higher-order
factors of the Family Relationship Measure are similar to those identified in other measures of
family relationship quality. As a predictor of risk, the Family Relationship Measure also relates
Mean values across informants are obtained for responses relating to daily interactions
and other behaviors. In consideration of both the average extent of endorsement and the level of
informant agreement, products of informants’ responses are obtained for responses relating to
For more detailed information about scoring and coding procedures, see:
Tolan, P.H., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D.B. (1999). Family Relationship Scale:
Instructions to Code and Scale. Families and Communities Research Group, Institute for Juvenile
The Family Relationship Scale (FRS) has been used for both research and clinical
purposes to measure six aspects of family relationships (Beliefs About Family, Cohesion, Shared
Deviant Beliefs, Support, Organization, & Communication) and the three underlying basic
dimensions (Cohesion, Family Beliefs, & Structure). It was developed by both Dr. Patrick H.
Tolan and Dr. Deborah Gorman-Smith. The FRS is intended to be used with two sources per
family, but instructions for scoring when only a single source is available are also provided here.
Proper utilization requires coding and then scaling of family members' responses. Instructions
and a coding/scaling template follow for both one and two raters. The following instructions
Validity
The Family Relationship Scale was validated on two independent samples - one sample
consisted of adolescent male inner-city youth and their parent(s) and the other sample consisted
of parents of inner city and urban poor elementary school children. The internal consistency of
the final scales is as follows: Beliefs About Family, % = .87; Cohesion, % = .72; Shared Deviant
included norms for the entire sample in table 1. Table 2 includes ethnicity norms for the FRS.
We have also included the norms by grade in table 3 and the norms by parent s partner status in
table 4. A parent was considered partnered if he or she is married or living as if married. The
FRS is currently being used with a wide range of samples. We encourage you to conduct
psychometrics including confirmatory factor analysis with your sample and request you to send
_____________________________
_____________________________
Questions 2, 9-10, 12-15, 17, 19-20, 22, 25-26, 30-36, 39-50, 52, 59-61 are scaled as
Questions 1, 3-8, 11, 16, 18, 21, 23-24, 27-29, 37-38, 51, 53-58 are reverse scored as
_____________________________
_____________________________
Instructions
One rater
Please refer to the "one rater" coding template. First, sum all of the answers within the
scale. Next, divide this sum by the total number of items answered on that scale to obtain the
Two raters
FRS Coding Instructions 6
Please refer to the "two raters" coding template. Both the "Beliefs About Family" scale
and the "Shared Deviant Beliefs" scales require the use of product scores when it is completed by
two family members. Step 1: Multiply the two raters scores together to obtain a product score
for each item. For example, if the measure is given out to both parents then use the product of
the mother s and father s score for each question. So, for question number 40, the product score
would be a result of the mother's response to question 40 multiplied with the father's response to
question 40. Repeat this until a product score for each question with two raters has been
obtained.
Step 2: Now, to bring the score back into a similar range of the one rater score, take the
square root of the product score. This is the finalized item score. If one rater skips a question,
After obtaining the proper score for each question in the "Beliefs About Family"
(questions 40-45) and Shared Deviant Beliefs (questions 53, 54, 57, & 58) scales, all of these
product scores should be averaged within their respective scales. Steps 3 and 4 will explain how
to do that. Please see the end of the "two raters" coding template for further guidance with Steps
3 and 4. Step 3: Sum all of the finalized item scores within the scale. Step 4: Next, count how
many questions were answered by each family within each scale (i.e., the highest number
answered by either respondent). Then average these two scores by dividing the sum of the
finalized item scores by the total number of questions answered to obtain the final scaled score.
One rater
FRS Coding Instructions 7
Please refer to the one rater coding template. First, sum all of the answers within the
scale. Next, divide this sum by the total number of items answered on the scale to obtain the
Two raters
Please refer to the two raters coding template. If two family members fill out the
Family Relationship Scale, then their two scores must be averaged to form a single score for each
question (for the Cohesion , Support , Organization , & Communication scales). Step 1:
Average the two responses to each item to form one score per item. For example, if a mother and
father both answer question number 14, then the mother s score to question 14 and the father s
score to question 14 must be averaged together to form one score for question 14. If one parent
is missing then there is no need to average the score for that question.
After obtaining the proper score for each question, all of these new , or averaged, item
scores should be averaged within each scale. Step 2: Average all combined items within each
scale in order to obtain the final scaled score for each family. For example, once all of the
average scores have been computed for each of the items on the Cohesion scale (questions 14,
15, 17, 19, 20, & 22), then all of the averaged scores for questions 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, and 22
Table 1:
Table 2:
Ethnicity n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD
African-
351 3.51a .43 351 3.15a .50 351 1.41a .61 351 3.22a .58 351 3.36a .49 351 2.99a .60
American
Caucasian 90 3.36b .36 90 3.10a .37 90 1.36a .38 90 3.04b .47 90 3.15b .44 90 2.97a .49
Hispanic 389 3.48a .36 389 3.38b .48 387 1.37a .41 389 2.99b .56 389 3.34a .53 389 3.30b .60
Other 19 3.71a .31 19 3.49b .40 19 1.43a .63 19 3.33a,b .54 19 3.56a .32 19 3.40b .47
Note: Within columns, means with different superscripts are significantly different at p < .05.
Table 3:
Grade n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD
K 425 3.60a .34 425 3.35a .50 425 1.31a .41 425 3.35a .46 425 3.62a .37 425 3.25a .65
2 142 3.38b .43 142 3.22a,b .44 142 1.43a,b .42 142 2.96b .55 142 3.17b .47 142 3.08b .56
3 188 3.43b .40 188 3.16b .51 187 1.37a,b .40 188 2.86b .57 188 3.12b .51 188 3.04b .58
4 4 3.93a,b .01 4 3.54a,b .28 4 1.38a,b .43 4 3.46a,b .66 4 3.50a,b .24 4 3.08a,b .69
5 155 3.40b .40 155 3.18b .46 155 1.47b .46 155 2.92b .60 155 3.11b .50 155 3.00b .57
6 31 3.52a,b .55 31 3.19a,b .57 30 1.52a,b .61 31 3.01b .53 31 3.22b .63 31 3.05a,b .62
Note: Within columns, means with different superscripts are significantly different at p < .05.
Table 4:
Norms for the Family Relationship Scale by Primary Care-Giver s Partner Status*.
Married or Living as if
Beliefs About Family 322 3.55 .44 561 3.49 .37 5.90 .02
Shared Deviant Beliefs 321 1.42 .47 560 1.35 .40 5.79 .02
*Sixty-two participants were excluded because the parent s partner status was unknown.
FRS Coding Instructions 12
Table 5:
and
INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS: “Below are a list of things that describe families. We want to
know how much each one is true about your family. Using the scale on this sheet, circle the letter under
each item to say how true each one is about your family in your opinion.”
Almost
Always
Not At All Hardly True A or Always
True Ever True Lot True
1. My family expects too much of me. A B C D
Strongly Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Agree
40. Family togetherness is very important. A B C D
If this assessment is not regarding a specific child of yours, please select a child and answer
questions 48-52 with that child in mind. Please indicate the age and gender of the child you have
in mind on the spaces provided.
Male / Female
CHILD’S AGE EASE CIRCLE ONE)
Strongly Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree Agree
48. Kids ‘s age should call home if they
think they might be late. A B C D