Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Over the past ten years, more and more discrete manufacturers have deployed
Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) solutions to optimize product development
and enhance bottom-line performance. Paradoxically, however, there is still wide-
spread confusion and disagreement concerning the essential capabilities and func-
tionality of PLM. Ultimately, PLM’s potential as a game-changing technology will
never be fully realized until a single, comprehensive definition of PLM is formu-
lated and universally accepted. The fact is, manufacturers will be able to experi-
ence the complete range of PLM’s benefits – and choose the best PLM solution –
only when they fully and implicitly understand what PLM is, and what it can (and
should) do for them.
In this first of a three-part series of related papers, PTC provides a definitive expla-
nation of PLM, based on a decade of experience building and implementing PLM
solutions across the globe. This overview examines the growing importance of PLM
and identifies the “must-have” capabilities of a PLM solution, the ‘extended capa-
bilities’ of a PLM solution, as well as the three critical system architecture charac-
teristics that manufacturing executives can confidently employ as a “buyer’s check
list,” to ensure they make the smartest possible investments in PLM technology. In
part two we explore the “must-have” capabilities of PLM in detail, then part three
examines the “extended capabilities”. In combination, the series provides a com-
prehensive guide to the most informed PLM decision.
Why has PLM become so important? In short, the implications of adding a PLM solution are clear:
In the manufacturing industry today, product development • Companies exist to make money for their shareholders by
processes and profitability are inextricably linked. There is a achieving sustained earnings growth
strong causal relationship, whereby such processes have a
profound, direct impact on manufacturers’ ability to generate • Revenue growth and cost reduction are the only two ways
sustained earnings growth. Fundamental in today’s global to improve earnings – with revenue growth being the more
business environment – one that’s characterized by geographi- sustainable, unbounded option
cally dispersed work groups, increased competition, and
• Revenue growth is four times more influential than cost
new customer requirements in emerging markets – product
reduction, with regard to profit contribution
development challenges for discrete manufacturers are more
complex than ever. • PLM enables product-centric organizations to meet their
bottom-line goals while addressing product development
Since these challenges – which concern everything from hav-
process challenges related to regulatory pressures,
ing more project stakeholders, to managing disparate systems
product complexity, and geographic dynamics
with incompatible data, to dealing with increased frequency
of design changes and complying with stricter industry regu- • Similar to the evolution of ERP, PLM is a consolidating
lations – represent formidable obstacles to business profitabil- technology that offers significant IT cost-of-ownership
ity and success, it’s critical that organizations determine how benefits
to effectively address such issues. (It’s important to note that
while revenue improvement represents 80% of the profit op- • Unlike ERP – which focuses on cost-reduction initiatives –
portunity and cost reduction represents the remaining 20%, in- PLM addresses both cost reduction and revenue growth
dustry leaders successfully adopt best practices in both areas.)
• PLM has reached a point in its maturity where its ROI
At an ever-increasing rate, manufacturers have come to re- potential is making it a top-of-mind business imperative
gard product lifecycle management (PLM) as the solution. for C-level executives
“Organizations implementing PLM can expect “In addition to PLM’s inherent value, PLM de-
both top-line and bottom-line benefits that cisions have strong influence on the business
come from gains in time-to-market, operational model and benefits that can be realized by ERP,
efficiency, production costs and regulatory com- SCM and CRM applications in downstream busi-
pliance.”1 ness processes; in that sense, PLM is the most
–Forrester Research
fundamental business application in manufac-
turing.”
Likewise, IDC Manufacturing Insights’ assessment that PLM is
–Gartner Group, Inc.
assuming corporate-wide importance – ”PLM is slowly matur-
ing into an enterprise decision-making discipline”2 – reflects
The need for a clearer definition
a growing consensus among analysts that PLM’s significance
will one day rival well-established enterprise solutions like ERP In light of PLM’s growing awareness and adoption, it’s inter-
(Enterprise Resource Planning), CRM (Customer Relationship esting to note that while there is also widespread agreement
Management) and SCM (Supply Chain Management), and on the benefits of PLM, there is some disagreement on its pre-
potentially offer even greater value. Gartner expresses this cise definition.
sentiment even more pointedly, by asserting: “In addition to
PLM’s inherent value, PLM decisions have strong influence on
the business model and benefits that can be realized by ERP,
SCM and CRM applications in downstream business process-
es; in that sense, PLM is the most fundamental business appli-
cation in manufacturing.” 3
As a recognized leader in PLM – providing PLM solutions to For clarity’s sake, it’s important to note that PLM does not in-
worldwide organizations for more than ten years – PTC con- clude the technologies used to author the information compo-
tends that PLM is now an indispensable technology for help- nents that populate a product’s BOM – such as MCAD/ECAD
ing discrete manufacturers optimize product development files and engineering calculations. Consequently, desktop
processes, and that it will continue to drive business growth solutions like CAD/CAM/CAE software and math calculations
well into the distant future. As such, it is important for business software are related to PLM, yet are outside PLM’s purview.
leaders evaluating PLM solutions to have a common under-
standing of PLM throughout the industry. In furtherance of this To be assured of successful management and evolution of a
goal – and to enable manufacturers to appreciate the full po- product’s BOM – that is, successful PLM return-on-investment
tential of PLM – this paper defines the components, capabilities, (ROI) – manufacturers must implement solutions that, at a min-
imum, feature the following:
and functionality of best-in-class PLM software.
1. A foundation set of “must-have” capabilities, delivered
Although introduced in the late 1990s, PLM still lacks a con-
through seven distinct PLM components (see Table 1);
sistent definition. This may stem from the initial, commonly ac-
and
cepted belief that PLM represented a conglomeration of func-
tional disciplines – analogous to how ERP unified finance, HR, 2. A single, scalable system architecture–characterized
manufacturing, and warehouse systems. Originally, PLM was by high performance, effective data replication, and
perceived to encompass mechanical computer-aided design robust security – that is integral, Internet-based, and
(MCAD), manufacturing (CAM), and engineering (CAE), as interoperable
well as simulation and product data management (PDM) solu-
tions. However, that assumption has proven somewhat erro- In addition, to mitigate risk and reduce total cost of ownership
neous over the past decade, as PLM has evolved into a more (TCO), PLM solutions should offer sufficiently rich capabilities–
comprehensive, enterprise-wide global solution. out of the box – so as to minimize software customization.
Its success to date notwithstanding, PLM’s potential as a Of particular importance to highly innovative, forward-look-
game-changing technology will never be fully realized as long ing manufacturers seeking to leverage the full potential of
as there is confusion regarding its essential capabilities and PLM – and thereby experience the benefits of its value proposi-
functionality. Manufacturers need to implicitly understand all tion in full – are eight additional PLM components that provide
that PLM can do for them – and all that it makes possible to more sophisticated, extended capabilities (see Table 1).
achieve. This knowledge will enable manufacturers to lever-
age the technology in ways that can yield process efficiencies “With PLM, we can get a really good indication of
that were previously unattainable. the maturity of where the product is at any given
All of which underscores the vital importance of having a un- moment. The result is that we get a more granu-
ambiguous definition for PLM. lar review and approval process and better vis-
ibility into our product maturity.”
Finally: a comprehensive definition of PLM
– B rent Barnes, Manager of Documentation Systems,
So, what exactly is PLM? PLM is software designed to enhance Cochlear Ltd.
process efficiencies related to a product’s bill-of-materials
(BOM) – the core information that tells manufacturing compa-
nies how to design, manufacture and support products. Spe-
cifically, PLM software enables manufacturers to optimize the
management and evolution of a BOM throughout a product’s
entire lifecycle – from conception to retirement. Any and all
activities that affect, change, influence, or finalize a BOM are
the factors that will drive a manufacturer’s overall operational
effectiveness and, as such, are subsumed within the PLM um-
brella.
Document Management •
Embedded Visualization •
Workflow •
Distributed Collaboration •
Multi-CAD data management •
Complete BOM management (i.e., combined MCAD, ECAD
software content in a single product structure) •
The PLM market is currently in a state of transition – one in which the capabilities and characteristics
considered essential in a PLM solution are being reevaluated, yielding some results that are already
apparent. For example, two major PLM vendors – recognizing the importance of database consolida-
tion and a single architecture platform – are evolving their offerings accordingly. Developments like
these seemingly serve as third-party validation of PTC’s PLM definition.
In providing a comprehensive definition of PLM, the discussion Employing the right architecture is critical to a successful PLM
thus far has addressed the question: What components com- implementation. For example, if PLM software provides all 15
prise best-in-class PLM software? This final section rounds out above-referenced capabilities, but utilizes a delivery method
the definition by addressing an equally important question: that requires five different databases or five unique user expe-
How are those components delivered? riences, the software should be disregarded as a viable PLM
alternative.
• Interoperable. By using standard protocols, an 1. Forrester Research, Inc., ROI of Product Life Cycle Management, February
2009.
interoperable architecture for a PLM solution enables
2. IDC Manufacturing Insights, Product Lifecycle Strategies Top 10 Predictions
seamless sharing of product content and processes for 2010, Webcast, 2010.
through integration with legacy and enterprise systems/ 3. Gartner Group, Inc., Brant, Kenneth F. and Halpern, Marc; Findings: PLM’s
technologies – including heterogeneous CAD applications Business Value Is Fundamental, Yet Still Not Well-Understood, April 1, 2010.
and enterprise solutions like ERP, CRM, and SCM.
© 2010, Parametric Technology Corporation (PTC). All rights reserved. Information described
herein is furnished for informational use only and is subject to change without notice. The
“The entire Group will benefit tremendously from only warranties for PTC products and services are set forth in the express warranty statements
this new partnership and from the creation of a accompanying such products and services and nothing herein should be construed as con-
stituting an additional warranty. References to customer successes are based upon a single
harmonized PLM environment, which leads to user experience and such customer’s testimonial. Analyst or other forward-looking statements
cost savings, reduced time-to-market and im- about PTC products and services or the markets in which PTC participates are those of the
analysts themselves and PTC makes no representations as to the basis or accuracy thereof.
proved product quality.” PTC, the PTC Logo, Creo, Elements/Direct, Elements/Pro, Elements/View, Unlock Potential,
Think. Create. Believe. and all PTC product names and logos are trademarks or registered
– Jean Botti, EADS, Chief Technical Officer trademarks of PTC and/or its subsidiaries in the United States and in other countries. All other
product or company names are property of their respective owners. The timing of any prod-
uct release, including any features or functionality, is subject to change at PTC’s discretion.