Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I, from group IV Section D, chose the case of G.S., a 38 year old client who had
undergone surgery to correct his bones in his left arm. Upon seeing my client, he was
sitting on the bed in the hospital. When I asked him if I could perform an assessment on
him, he looked at his wife and said yes. These were the factors that I considered in
choosing my client:
2. The nature of the disease, which I believe will help me develop my skills and
acquire the actual knowledge about the disease.
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
FRACTURE
A bone fracture is a break in a bone. Fractures are common. Most people fracture
at least one bone during their lifetime.
The severity of fractures increase with age. Children's bones are more flexible and
less likely to break. Falls or other accidents that do not harm children can cause complete
fractures in older adults. Older adults suffer from fractures more than children because
their bones are more likely to be brittle.
Fractures occur when a bone can't withstand the physical force exerted on it.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE:
To be able to:
1. Establish rapport with my client as well as his family to help them recognize
and give importance on their health and personal development.
2. Review my knowledge about anatomy and physiology of bone specifically
humerus, radius and ulna as well as the pathophysiology of bone fracture.
3. Review the medications of my client
4. Identify and analyze present health problems of my client that might place
him at risk and be able to use my nursing skills to help him.
5. Formulate appropriate nursing interventions, that will solve, if not, will reduce
or lessen the health problems of my client, by involving him as well as the
members of my group.
6. Impart necessary knowledge regarding health maintenance to my client that
will guide him to achieve a healthy life.
7. Evaluate the effectiveness of my nursing care plan.
PATIENT’S PROFILE
Chief Complaint:
“Di ko na maigalaw ang braso ko, ” as verbalized by the client.
Socio-Economic History:
Mr. G.S. is a high school student. He will be the one to pay for his hospital bills
and also supported by hi siblings. He is a security Guard in ABS-CBN. Their monthly
income ranges from 19,000 pesos.
13 AREAS OF ASSESSMENT
I. Social Status
Mr. G.S., 38 yrs old, is the 4th child of his parents. He was born in Zamboanga and grew
up in Quezon City. His wife is a housewife. They are currently living in their own house
at Payatas, Quezon City. The people is living with him 2 children and 2 pamangkin. He is
a Born Again in religion and rarely attends mass. His usual activities before his
confinement include playing with his children, washing dishes, washing his clothes and
sweeping the floor. According to Erik Erikson’s Eight Stages of Development, he falls
under the Middle Adulthood: 35 to 55 or 65, Ego Development Outcome: Generativity
vs. Self absorption or Stagnation and the Basic Strengths: Production and Care During
this stage, an individual can either manifest positive resolution that may indicate to
perpetuate culture and transmit values of the culture through the family (taming the kids)
and working to establish a stable environment. Strength comes through care of others and
production of something that contributes to the betterment of society. I was able to
conclude that he manifested positive resolution. It is because he is the bread winner and
he has time to care for his family.
A. Auditory
Mr. G.S.’s auricles are bean shaped and of the same color with the facial skin.
They are symmetrical and aligned with the outer canthus of his eyes. I palpated
his auricles; they were firm and not tender. His pinna recoiled when we folded it.
He exhibited no pain when his auricles were gently pulled upward, downward and
backward. Using a penlight we inspected the external auditory canal and we have
observed that both have dry cerumen. To test his gross hearing acuity we
performed the tuning fork tests. I performed first the Weber’s test using a tuning
fork with his eyes blind folded; we held the tuning fork at its base and activated it
by tapping the fork gently against the back of our hand near the knuckles. I placed
the base of the tuning fork on top of his head and asked him where he heard the
noise. He said that he heard it on both ears. I also conducted the Rinne test by
asking him to cover one of his ears. I held the handle of the activated tuning fork
on the mastoid process of his ears until he stated that the vibration could no longer
be heard. Then I held the still vibrating fork in front of his ear canal. I asked him
if he heard the sound and he answered yes. I also did the same test on his other
ear. He stated that the sound was more audible when the tuning fork was in front
of his ear canal. Mr. G.S. is Weber negative and positive in the Rinne test.
B. Smell
I observed that Mr. G.S.’s nose is symmetric and straight. Its color is the same as
the facial skin. No discharge was observed from the nares. I lightly palpated his
nose. No tender areas and no lesions palpated. To determine the patency of his
nasal cavities, I asked him to close his mouth and exert pressure on one nares and
breathe through the opposite nares. After doing the procedure on both nares, we
noted that the air moves freely as he breathes. I tested his sense of smell by letting
him identify four sample scents while his eyes were blind folded. I let him smell
safeguard soap (fragrant), vinegar (sour), white flower (menthol) and Spirit of
Ammonia (foul). He was able to identify all the odors correctly.
B. Gustatory
Mr. G.S..’s tongue is pinkish and is in central position. It moves freely and its
frenulum is highly vascular. I assessed his sense of taste by letting him taste sugar
(sweet), salt (salty), vinegar (sour), and coffee (bitter) respectively while his eyes
were covered. I let him taste first the sugar by placing a pinch of it on the tip of
the tongue depressor. Next, I let him taste the salt by doing the same procedure.
Then I let him taste the vinegar by dipping the tip of the tongue depressor into the
vinegar. After which, a pinch of coffee was also placed on the tip of the tongue
depressor allowing him to taste it. I have done the test by letting him sip water in
between tasting each sample. He was able to identify and differentiate each
sample correctly.
C. Tactile
With his eyes still blindfolded, I assessed Mr. G.S.’s sense of touch by letting him
identify a sand paper from an ordinary paper (rough vs. smooth), cotton from a
mug (soft vs. hard), tip of a pen from cover of a pen (sharp vs. dull) and a bowl
with hot soup from a bottle of cold water (warm vs. cold). I applied those on his
right upper extremity, right lower extremity, left upper extremity, and left lower
extremity. He was able to identify it all correctly except for his left arm.
V. Motor Ability
Mr. G.S.. was able to ambulate without assistance and has his bathroom
privileges. He has a functional level of 0 because he is completely independent. I asked
him to follow us as we do the Range of Motion (ROM). After such he was able to rotate,
abduct, adduct, flex and extend his right upper and right lower extremities. I also did the
same procedure with the left upper and left lower extremities. Although he wasn’t able to
do it with his left upper extremity because of his cast he was able to perform it with his
left lower extremity. Aside from his left arm all his other body parts can move freely
against gravity. To assess his gait, we asked him to walk 5 steps forward and backward.
There, we observed that he has a balanced gait. All his muscle strength was graded 5/5
except for his left arm with 2/5.
X. Elimination Status
During my assessment, I asked my client how often he voids per day. He said that
before his confinement he defecates twice and urinates four times daily, but since his
confinement, he has only defecated once. However, he was able to urinate thrice that day
with an approximated amount of 240 cc per void. His wife let him urinate in an empty
dextrose bottle. There we observed that it was yellow in color, was pungent and has a
concentration that is similar with water.
At the lower end of the humerus (upper arm bone) and the femur, there are two
smooth condyles (rounded processes of the bone): a knob-like "capitulum" on the lateral
side and a pulley-shaped "trochlea" in the middle. The capitulum unites with the radius
(smaller lower arm bone) at the elbow, and the trochlea is a notch, which joins ligaments
to the head of the ulna (larger lower arm bone). Above the condyles on either side are
"epicondyles," which provide attachments for muscles and ligaments of the elbow. The
one toward the center of the arm is the "medial epicondyle," and the one to the side is the
"lateral epicondyle."
Ulna
The ulna is the longer of the two bones of the forearm; the other being the radius. When
the palm faces forward, the ulna is the inner bone (the one nearest the body) running
down the forearm parallel to the radius. The upper end joins with the radius and extends
into a rounded projection that fits around the lower end of the humerus (the upper arm
bone) to form the elbow joint. The lower end of the ulna is rounded and forms a joint
with the wrist bones and lower end of the radius.
Radius
The radius is the shorter of the two long bones of the forearm. The other is the ulna. The
radius is the bone on the thumb side of the arm. The shaft of the radius has a broad base
that joins the lower end of the ulna and the upper bones of the wrist at a large process
called the radial styloid. The disk-shaped head of the radius, which is smaller than the
base, joins the lower end of the humerus (bone in the upper arm) to form the elbow joint.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
BONE FRACTURE. When a bone is broken, the periosteum and blood vessels
in the cortex, marrow, and surrounding soft tissues are disrupted. Bleeding occurs from
the damaged ends of the bone and from the neighboring soft tissue. A clot (hematoma)
forms within the medullary canal, between the fractured ends of the bone, and beneath
the periosteum. Bone tissue immediately adjacent to the fracture dies. This necrotic tissue
along with any debris in the fracture area stimulates an intense inflammatory response
inflammatory leukocytes and mast cells. This results to pain of the fracture site, edema
(will develop shoulder and/or elbow stiffness due to keeping their hand in a protected
position of elbow flexion and shoulder adduction), crepitus (a crackling sound, heard
when pieces move), loss of function of that body part, a deformity of the fracture site and
immobility.
PREDISPOSING FACTOR PRECIPITATING FACTOR
FRACTURE
INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE
1. I was able to establish rapport with my client as well as his family and helped
them recognize and gave importance on their health and personal development.
2. I was able to identify and analyze present health problems of our client that might
place him at risk and I was able to use my nursing skills to help him.
3.I was able to formulate appropriate nursing interventions that lessen the health
problems of my client.
Positioning (Goals)
* to prevent contractures
* stimulate circulation and prevent pressure sores
* prevent thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism.
* promote lung expansion and prevent pneumonia
* decrease edema of the extremities
* changing position from lying to sitting several times
a day can help prevent changes in the CVS known as deconditioning.
* the recommendation is to change body position at least
every 2 hours, and preferably more frequently in patients who have no
spontaneous movement.
6. Teach patient and family to perform wound care to flap or skin graft after
the wound is closed in 5 to 7 days.