Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of my research is to clarify whether a difference in motivation to w
ork between manger and worker exists or not. I am thrilled to discover if divers
e factors motivate the two or if they have shared understandings and common fact
ors. To be able to present a clear picture I will find suitable theories on the
topic of motivation. The theories will help me to interpret and analyze the coll
ected data.
Continuously, I will accomplish carefully planned interviews with workers as wel
l as managers in different companies to get the individual perspective. I would
like to get in touch with different organizations to get an objective picture, w
hich will not be influenced by a single company’s surroundings. Moreover, I think
that it is important to notice that if a difference will be discovered it might
be important to take it into Consideration in future organizational behavior.
1.3 Problem discussion
As mentioned earlier, motivation is crucial for organizations to function, witho
ut motivated employees no one would make an effort to work and the company’s perfo
rmance would be less efficient. While studying management I found out that most
of the theories regarding motivation focus upon employees in general and do not
reflect on specific positions. On the contrary, I think that there might be a no
ticeable difference in motivation between diverse levels of employees. I am curi
ous to know whether the old school theorists have taken this fact into considera
tion or if it has been overlooked during time. Moreover, general and Ill-known t
heories pay a great attention to human needs whereby self- actualization and job
satisfaction are the dominant reasons for people to be motivated to work. Other
theories concerning the question what is the factor behind motivation focus mos
tly on money. Their argument is that without payment no one would go to work. My
opinion is that there must be more underlying causes to motivation than money,
at least when discussing managers.
In addition, what catches my interest is the difference between a manager and a
worker, where I think of the manager as a person in a leading position who has r
esponsibility over others as well as towards the organization. Whereby the worke
r is a person working in a lower position in the organizational hierarchy, and t
herefore does not have the same Task or responsibility.
THEORY
Theories of Motivation
2.1) Contribution of Robert Owen:
Though Owen is considered to be paternalistic in his view, his contribution is o
f a considerable significance in the theories of Motivation. During the early ye
ars of the nineteenth century, Owens’s textile mill at New Lanark in Scotland was
the scene of some novel ways of treating people. His view was that people were s
imilar to machines. A machine that is looked after properly, cared for and maint
ained well, performs efficiently, reliably and lastingly, similarly people are l
ikely to be more efficient if they are taken care of. Robert Owen practiced what
he preached and introduced such things as employee housing and company shop. Hi
s ideas on this and other matters were considered to be too revolutionary for th
at time.
2.2) Jeremy Bentham’s “The Carrot and the Stick Approach”:
Possibly the essence of the traditional view of people at work can be best appre
ciated by a brief look at the work of this English philosopher, whose ideas were
also developed in the early years of the Industrial Revolution, around 1800. Be
ntham’s view was that all people are self-interested and are motivated by the desi
re to avoid pain and find pleasure. Any worker will work only if the reward is b
ig enough, or the punishment sufficiently unpleasant. This view - the ‘carrot and
stick’ approach - was built into the philosophies of the age and is still to be fo
und, especially in the older, more traditional sectors of industry.
The various leading theories of motivation and motivators seldom make reference
to the carrot and the stick. This metaphor relates, of course, to the use of rew
ards and penalties in order to induce desired behavior. It comes from the old st
ory that to make a donkey move, one must put a carrot in front of him or dab him
with a stick from behind. Despite all the research on the theories of motivatio
n, reward and punishment are still considered strong motivators. For centuries,
however, they were too often thought of as the only forces that could motivate p
eople.
At the same time, in all theories of motivation, the inducements of some kind of
‘carrot’ are recognized. Often this is money in the form of pay or bonuses. Even th
ough money is not the only motivating force, it has been and will continue to be
an important one. The trouble with the money ‘carrot’ approach is that too often ev
eryone gets a carrot, regardless of performance through such practices as salary
increase and promotion by seniority, automatic ‘merit’ increases, and executive bon
uses not based on individual manager performance. It is as simple as this: If a
person put a donkey in a pen full of carrots and then stood outside with a carro
t, would the donkey be encouraged to come out of the pen?
The ‘stick’, in the form of fear–fear of loss of job, loss of income, reduction of bon
us, demotion, or some other penalty–has been and continues to be a strong motivato
r. Yet it is admittedly not the best kind. It often gives rise to defensive or r
etaliatory behavior, such as union organization, poor-quality work, and executiv
e indifference, failure of a manager to take any risks in decision making or eve
n dishonesty. But fear of penalty cannot be overlooked. Whether managers are fir
st-level supervisors or chief executives, the power of their position to give or
with hold rewards or impose penalties of various kinds gives them an ability to
control, to a very great extent, the economic and social well-being of their su
bordinates.
3) Abraham Maslow’s “Need Hierarchy Theory”:
One of the most widely mentioned theories of motivation is the hierarchy of need
s theory put forth by psychologist Abraham Maslow. Maslow saw human needs in the
form of a hierarchy, ascending from the lowest to the highest, and he concluded
that when one set of needs is satisfied, this kind of need ceases to be a motiv
ator.
As per his theory these needs are:
(I) Physiological needs:
These are important needs for sustaining the human life. Food, water, warmth, sh
elter, sleep, medicine and education are the basic physiological needs which fal
l in the primary list of need satisfaction. Maslow was of an opinion that until
these needs were satisfied to a degree to maintain life, no other motivating fac
tors can work.
(ii) Security or Safety needs:
These are the needs to be free of physical danger and of the fear of losing a jo
b, property, food or shelter. It also includes protection against any emotional
harm.
(iii) Social needs:
Since people are social beings, they need to belong and be accepted by others. P
eople try to satisfy their need for affection, acceptance and friendship.
(iv) Esteem needs:
According to Maslow, once people begin to satisfy their need to belong, they ten
d to want to be held in esteem both by themselves and by others. This kind of ne
ed produces such satisfaction as power, prestige status and self-confidence. It
includes both internal esteem factors like self-respect, autonomy and achievemen
ts and external esteem factors such as states, recognition and attention.
(v) Need for self-actualization:
Maslow regards this as the highest need in his hierarchy. It is the drive to bec
ome what one is capable of becoming; it includes growth, achieving one’s potential
and self-fulfillment. It is to maximize one’s potential and to accomplish somethi
ng.
As each of these needs is substantially satisfied, the next need becomes dominan
t. From the standpoint of motivation, the theory would say that although no need
is ever fully gratified, a substantially satisfied need no longer motivates. So
if you want to motivate someone, you need to understand what level of the hiera
rchy that person is on and focus on satisfying those needs or needs above that l
evel.
Maslow’s need theory has received wide recognition, particularly among practicing
managers. This can be attributed to the theory’s intuitive logic and ease of under
standing. However, research does not validate this theory. Maslow provided no em
pirical evidence and other several studies that sought to validate the theory fo
und no support for it.
4) “Theory X and Theory Y” of Douglas McGregor:
McGregor, in his book “The Human side of Enterprise” states that people inside the o
rganization can be managed in two ways. The first is basically negative, which f
alls under the category X and the other is basically positive, which falls under
the category Y. After viewing the way in which the manager dealt with employees
, McGregor concluded that a manager’s view of the nature of human beings is based
on a certain grouping of assumptions and that he or she tends to mold his or her
behavior towards subordinates according to these assumptions.
Under the assumptions of theory X:
• Employees inherently do not like work and whenever possible, will attempt to avo
id it.
• Because employees dislike work, they have to be forced, coerced or threatened wi
th punishment to achieve goals.
• Employees avoid responsibilities and do not work fill formal directions are issu
ed.
• Most workers place a greater importance on security over all other factors and d
isplay little ambition.
In contrast under the assumptions of theory Y:
• Physical and mental effort at work is as natural as rest or play.
• People do exercise self-control and self-direction and if they are committed to
those goals.
• Average human beings are willing to take responsibility and exercise imagination
, ingenuity and creativity in solving the problems of the organization.
• That the way the things are organized, the average human being’s brainpower is onl
y partly used.
On analysis of the assumptions it can be detected that theory X assumes that low
er-order needs dominate individuals and theory Y assumes that higher-order needs
dominate individuals. An organization that is run on Theory X lines tends to be
authoritarian in nature, the word “authoritarian” suggests such ideas as the “power t
o enforce obedience” and the “right to command.” In contrast Theory Y organizations ca
n be described as “participative”, where the aims of the organization and of the ind
ividuals in it are integrated; individuals can achieve their own goals best by d
irecting their efforts towards the success of the organization.
However, this theory has been criticized widely for generalization of work and h
uman behavior.
5) Contribution of Rensis Likert:
Likert developed a refined classification, breaking down organizations into four
management systems.
1st System – Primitive authoritarian
2nd System – Benevolent authoritarian
3rd System – Consultative
4th System – Participative
As per the opinion of Likert, the 4th system is the best, not only for profit or
ganizations, but also for non-profit firms.
6) Frederick Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory:
Frederick has tried to modify Maslow’s need Hierarchy theory. His theory is also k
nown as two-factor theory or Hygiene theory. He stated that there are certain sa
tisfiers and dissatisfies for employees at work. In- transit factors are related
to job satisfaction, while extrinsic factors are associated with dissatisfactio
n. He devised his theory on the question: “What do people want from their jobs?” He
asked people to describe in detail, such situations when they felt exceptionally
good or exceptionally bad. From the responses that he received, he concluded th
at opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction. Removing dissatisfying chara
cteristics from a job does not necessarily make the job satisfying. He states th
at presence of certain factors in the organization is natural and the presence o
f the same does not lead to motivation. However, their no presence leads to demo
nization. In similar manner there are certain factors, the absence of which caus
es no dissatisfaction, but their presence has motivational impact.
Examples of Hygiene factors are:
Security, status, relationship with subordinates, personal life, salary, work co
nditions, relationship with supervisor and company policy and administration.
Examples of Motivational factors are:
Growth prospectus job advancement, responsibility, challenges, recognition and a
chievements.
UNIT LINKED
Regular Premium
New Family Gain II
New Unit Gain II
Family Assure II
Century Plus III
Unit Gain Protection Plus II
Smart Investment Plan II
Max Gain
Single Premium
Wealth Gain
PENSION
Annuity
Pension Guarantee
Retirement
Future Income Generator
Saran Vishranti
Retirement Advantage RP
Retirement Advantage SP
Future Secure II
TRADITIONAL
Endowment
InvestGain
SaveCare Economy SP
Life Time Care
Super Saver
Invest Plus
Money Back
CashGain
TERM PLANS
Protector
Term Care
New Risk Care
WOMEN INSURANCE
House Wives
HEALTH
Care First
Health Care
Family CareFirst
CHILDREN PLAN
ChildGain
YoungCare II
JUST LAUNCHED
Shield Plus
Group Seva Plan
Group Secure Life
OFFERINGS
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. offers a range of insurance product
s to its clients. The following insurances are offered by the company:
• Motor Insurance
• Asset Insurance
o Home Insurance
o Shop / Showroom: Protection against all risks
• Health Insurance
o Health Guard
o Personal Guard
o Hospital Cash
o Critical Illness
o Silver Health
o E-Opinion
o Star Package
o Health Ensure
o Insta Insure
o Sankat Mochan
o Family Floater HG
o Tax Gain
• Travel Insurance
o Travel Companion
o Student Companion
o Pravasi Bharati Bima Yojana
o Travel Asia
o Travel Elite
o Travel Assist
o Swades Yatra
• Corporate Insurance
o Specialty Lines
Aviation
Marine Hull Insurance
Project Insurance
Sports & Entertainment Insurance
o Your Employees
Group Personal Accident
Group Health Guard
Group Critical Illness
Workmen s Compensation
Group Travel
Office
Office Package
Burglary
Plate Glass
Public Liability
Fire
Money
D & O Liability
Fidelity Guarantee
o Manufacturing Unit
Fire
Business Interruption
Industrial All Risk
Workmen s Compensation
Engineering
Public Liability
Product Liability
Composite Public & Product Liability
Interview with company area sales manager:-
Deepak has been operating within the insurance field since . His position in the
company is to be responsible for the organization, he is working with the finan
ce department as well as with customer relations. He puts the customers in focus
and stress that it is essential to provide the right product to the right custo
mer. When I asked Deepak what he considers to be his benefits he answered that t
he major factor is freedom. Continuously, it is due to his flexibility in work a
s long as the work is completed. Nowadays, for the family’s sake he tries to be at
the office between 8 am to 5 pm. For him, job satisfaction is something importa
nt; the people working for him must be good colleagues with similar mentality.
The factor that motivates Deepak is the relationship with his customers; he has
become good friends with many of his customers during the years. Therefore, the
customers trust him and very often they phone and tell him to invest their money
without serious meetings. Deepak values the trust very highly, and has worked h
ard to create the good relationships. Before, money was a motivating factor
Furthermore, of course Deepak can effect a great deal when it comes to company i
ssues, and as mentioned much of his work can be also be adjusted after his deman
ds. When Deepak is describing his leadership, he refers to himself as kind and h
umble toward the employees. At the same time, he presupposes that the personnel
carry through their work tasks in a way suitable for their customers.
BANK OF BARODA
The Bank of Baroda was established in the year 1908 in Baroda. Ever since its in
ception, the bank has been growing and expanding its branches successfully. At t
he turn of a century, the bank has its presence in 25 countries across the world
. Bank of Baroda has progressively taken a step towards commitment and values by
providing uncompromising standards of service to its customers, stakeholders, e
mployees and the like.
Heritage & Ethics of Bank of Baroda:
The Bank of Baroda was started on 20th July 1908 under the Companies Act of 1887
. The initial capital invested was Rs. 10 Lakhs. The Maharaja was none other tha
n Sayajirao Gaekwad who, with his visionary insight, planned the beginning of a
reputed journey which over the years, came to be known as the Bank of Baroda.
It is interesting to note that during the period of 1913 to 1917; almost 87 bank
s in India succumbed to a financial crisis. However, the Bank of Baroda survived
the economic depression by dint of its financial integrity, business prudence a
nd concern uncompromising concern about its customers and clients. This has tran
scended down to the present ages and has become the motto of the bank.
Investor Relations:
By December 1996, Bank of Baroda penetrated the equity market by successfully im
plementing the ‘Follow on Public Offer’ of around 71 million equity shares in Januar
y 2006. In the present scenario, Bank of Baroda s public shareholding is as high
as 46.19 percent with a total equity capital of 365.53 crore. This is held by R
etail Investors, Banks and Financial Institutions, Employees, FIIs and OCBs, Mut
ual Funds, Insurance Companies and Others.
Key Financial Indicators - Profitability Ratios of Bank of Baroda:-
Particulars 31.03.05 31.03.06 31.03.07 31.03.03
01.03.09
Interest expenses/AWF 3.68% 3.65% 4.35% 5.10% 5.14%
Non-Interest Income/AWF 1.40% 1.12% 1.11% 1.32% 1.42%
Cost Income Ratio 46.24% 55.43% 51.30% 50.89% 45.38%
Net profit / AWF 0.72% 0.78% 0.82% 0.93% 1.15%
Return on Assets 0.71% 0.73% 0.72% 0.80% 0.98%
Yield on Advances 7.18% 7.43% 8.37% 9.53% 9.50%
Products & Services
Given below is the list of services offered by the Bank of Baroda:-
• Retail Banking
• Rural/Agri Banking
• Wholesale Banking
• SME Banking
• Wealth Management
• Demat
• ATM / Debit Cards
Bank of Baroda takes special care to look after the requirements of its sharehol
ders. Given below are the various benefits provided to the shareholders of the b
ank:-
• Change of address or names of Shareholders
• Transmission of shares
• Transposition
• De-materializing Shares
• Investors Services Department
• Registrars & Share Transfer Agent
• Bonds related to Transfer
• Lodgment of Shares
• Duplicate Share Certificate
Personal Services
• Deposits
• Gen-Next
• Loans
• Credit Cards & Debit Cards
• Services
• Lockers
• NRI Services
• FGN Currency Credits (Foreign Currency Credits)
• ECB (External Communication Borrowings)
• FCNR (B) Loans
• Offshore Banking
• Finance in Export and Import
• Correspondent Banking Facility
• International Treasury
Treasury service of Bank of Baroda includes Domestic operations and Forex operat
ions.
Rural Facilities:-
Domestic Services
• Deposits
• Priority Sector Advances
• Services
As the most experienced automotive part solutions company in South Asia, PAVNA G
ROUP, enjoys a history of more than 34 years of innovation, technology, manufact
uring and market leadership. Today, PAVNA GROUP is a full-capability provider of
high quality genuine spare parts such as fuel cocks, auto locks, ignition swit
ches and other automotive parts solutions for automobile applications, serving a
utomobile manufacturing in India as-well-as worldwide.
PAVNA has ultra modern manufacturing plants in India, located in Aligarh, New De
lhi and Pune. These facilities have been laid out to match world s best plant en
gineering standards and as you hear this, my plants are busy producing automotiv
e products in large quantities to my customer s exacting standards. PAVNA Produc
ts has prestigious ISO- 9001:2000 Co. / TS 16949:2002 certification.
PAVNA facilities are manned by over a 600 highly skilled and specialized personn
el composed of associates, executives and manager
We have grown from success to success since foundation in the year 1971. The com
pany went for a Joint Venture in 2001 on its highly successful collaboration w
ith Zadi SPA, Italy.
Italy
Mission Statement
We are dedicated to achieve excellence in our work. PAVNA maintains the highest
ethical and professional standards and strives to stay on the leading edge in te
chnology, in an ever-changing environment.
While our greatest strength is the ability to understand the client’s goals, our s
uccess is very much attributed to strong teamwork, continuous R&D and the dedica
tion and commitment of each and every member of the PAVNA GROUP family to delive
r unsurpassed quality and reliable products & services to the total satisfaction
of all our customers.
Ibelieve that our historical success and future prospects are directly related t
o a combination of strengths, including the following :
»» Best ‘Speed to Market’ in Industry.
»» Cost efficiency
»» World class technology
»» Global scale of operations
»» Product range and expansion lend scalability to operations
»» Comprehensive CAD/CAM and product development capability
»» High Quality, motivated Human Resources
These extensive resources combined with our dedication to the highest profession
al standards enable us to support a wide range of our clients business needs.
Our customer base is highly diversified. Our market leadership has been attained
and preserved by successful utilization of our products by major global automot
ive manufacturers for several decades.
Methodology
Research journey
When I started to think about an appropriate topic for my research, motivation w
as the first thing that came to my mind. I am very interested in management, and
motivation plays a significant role in organizations and work in general. Furth
ermore, I want to discover if a difference exists regarding motivation to work b
etween a worker and a manager. I have created a time schedule that shows the jou
rney of my research. After deciding the topic and writing the introduction I wil
l start to find relevant literature, such as existing theories by well- known au
thors as well as more contemporary articles referring to motivation to work. Whe
n the methodology is completed it is natural to start to contact possible compan
ies that would be suitable for my empirical framework. My objective is to use co
mpanies which operate in different sector and also use more than one company to
create a wider picture of what motivates people. Moreover I will, were it is pos
sible, interview managers and workers within the same company. My data collectio
n will be of importance for me to understand the difference in motivation betwee
n the two. The theories that I find useful and worthy to use in my research will
help me to analyze and interpret the information that I have collected from the
interviews. I am inspired to find out if there are some aspects that distinguis
h the manager and the worker. These will be presented in my final conclusion. I
hope my work and findings will create a curiosity and contribute to further rese
arch in the subject.
Pre- understanding
It is important to have a pre- understanding when one would like to interpret an
d understand the collected material. The definition of pre- understanding is pre
vious knowledge about the subject, and experiences from the field that one is in
vestigating. A person’s experience can derive from both personal and working life
and from others through books, reports and lectures. Although, it is important t
o have a pre-understanding and one has to be open for new information and interp
retation. Taking all of this into consideration, I would like to present my pre-
understanding regarding management and motivation. The two authors have the same
academic background. I have chosen the path of management and have therefore ex
panded my knowledge within the area. Previously, studied basic organization theo
ries. One of the authors has studied psychology on university level and I feel t
hat that knowledge will also contribute to my research. Motivation also plays an
important role in psychology and in order to accomplish something I depend on m
otivation. Moreover, it can be useful knowledge when I interpret and analyze the
gathered information. I feel all my previous knowledge will be advantageous for
me to carry out good ideas and usable arguments for the conclusion
Research strategy
It is important for the researcher to decide what kind of research strategy he o
r she should Use, “there are two ways of establishing what is true or false and to
draw conclusions: induction and deduction.” In the inductive strategy the researc
her tries to create general conclusions, where the theory is the result of the s
tudy. However, these conclusions could not be one hundred percent certain due to
the reason that they are generated from The research process begins with data c
ollection and observations that lead to findings from which a theory can be deve
loped, On the other hand, the deduction strategy relies on logical reasoning an
d develops hypotheses from already published material. The starting positions in
this case are theories, concepts and models, where they are being used to expla
in the collected data as well as the studied phenomenon. This type of strategy i
s often used when the researcher test the theories in practice, and adopt quanti
tative studies.
OBSERVATIONS FINDINGS THEORY BUILDING
Finally the abovementioned strategies are usually combined as one, adduc
tive strategy. Additionally it is substantial to see the adductive strategy as a
mixture of both and not as a new strategy. In my research I will use the combin
ation, the underlying reasons is that theory will be presented before collecting
data, and when collecting it I will use qualitative data. Two ways of structuri
ng and working with a research, I will use the first way (1) and not the second
way, which is influenced by inductive strategy. In the first way the researchers
use existing knowledge to be able to structure the research problem, and to kno
w which facts are relevant and should be considered.
Money as primary motivator
In the book of Jackson and Carter called Rethinking Organizational Behavior, the
y have questioned traditional ways of understanding organization. Interestingly,
the primary reason for work could only be money according to their perspective.
Jackson and Carter claim that I live in a wage labor economy and therefore peop
le put a price on their work efforts. All other factors regarding motivation are
only secondary, in other words money comes before all non-material motivators.
They strengthen their argument with the statement that people “can survive without
job satisfaction, but cannot survive without a wage”
Withal, the main purpose to work is not the work itself instead it is the reward
s and bonuses given by the organization. Jackson and Carter argue that need theo
ries concerning motivation to work are misinterpreted. Preferably, such indicati
ons only rely on social constructions and are to be generalized. Additionally, t
hey stress that motivation is a product of the human mind and therefore it is im
possible for a person to directly motivate another person.
On the contrary a manager is capable of de-motivating a worker due to the fact t
hat incentives are restricted or due to a failure made by the worker. A manager
can also demotivate by creating a bad atmosphere at the workplace, for example,
by treating the workers with a lack of respect. Another noteworthy aspect mentio
ned in Rethinking Organizational Behaviors is that people are different, at leas
t when it comes to social classes “to make the rich work harder you pay them more,
to make the poor work harder you pay them less” There is no point in being rich i
f one does not get the possibility to communicate one’s status (e.g. have nice car
, wear fancy clothes) especially for those worse
Incentive motivators
Alexander D. Stajkovic and Fred Luthans have completed a study upon Differential
effects of incentive motivators on work performance. The most common incentive
motivators used in organizations are money, social recognition and performance f
eedback where it is important to recognize the differences in effect. Stajkovic
and Luthan claim that money is the most frequently used motivator, especially ca
sh payment. Moreover, this type of motivation brings huge costs for an organizat
ion. For the employee money is not only an amount of notes instead money gives t
hem the opportunity to buy things that they long for. With al money is a motivat
or because it can be used to satisfy physiological and psychological needs. Soci
al recognition involves personal attention through communication where one is ap
proved and appreciated for one’s work. This does not have any direct costs for the
organization, except that it demands much effort from both managers and colleag
ues. The outcome is that people will act in a way which gives them social recogn
ition and avoid Behavior that causes other’s disapproval.
Finally, the article reflects upon performance feedback as a motivator, when one
is performing a task it is for his or her importance to be evaluated for what t
hey are doing. It is crucial to communicate to the employees how they have perfo
rmed in relation to how they could have performed to be able to improve their wo
rk. This process includes the individual to develop self- reflection and thereby
create a better knowledge about the environment and themselves, which is seen a
s a motivator. In the end, the authors state that the mentioned motivators are i
ndividual and depending on the context, and they can differ from person to perso
n
Manager motivation
Jay T. Knippen a professor at University of south Florida and Thad B. Green who
is a business author and consultant have written an article regarding the questi
on of what motivates one’s boss. The article start off with a quote “Only God knows
and he won’t tell. But when you find out tell me and two of us will know.”There are
six different steps that one could use to analyze a manager’s behavior. The first
one is called review the basics of motivation, which the authors of the article
refers to as a guessing game. The reason is that it is an ongoing process which
never ends, a manager can be motivated by many different factors and those can b
e changed over time. The one who is investigating the behavior should analyze ho
w the manager behaves and what s/he values in life. Some examples could be; alwa
ys be right, play it safe, be liked, look good, be in control of everything, hav
e job security etc.
Continuing, once one has made one’s guesses of what the motivators are, one should
try to understand why they motivate. This will be done by asking the manager, a
sking others in the surroundings watch the manager and listen to him or her. Whe
n the investigator interviews the manager it is not always certain that the mana
ger will be totally truthful.
Moreover, one could ask other people who know the manager to get information abo
ut what motivates him or her. In addition, to watch the manager is a good way of
seeing how s/he behaves in different situation, where one should try to identif
y the motivational factors. It is of great importance that the person who wants
to know about manager behavior listens carefully to what s/he is saying. This mu
st be done to be able to analyze and interpret what motivates the manager.
Finally, the more often a motivator will occur, the more it is a sign of what mo
tivates the manager. Trying to define which factors affect him or her often will
determine the important motivators. If a manager is dominated by enjoying power
, advancement and money, s/he will not be concerned about the workers and if s/h
e is liked or not. On the other hand, a manager can be influenced by appreciatio
n from others as well as good relationship with co-workers and job security wher
e that manager is not very result oriented and not egoistic
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
“The purpose of methodology is to describe the research procedure. Thi
s includes overall research design, sampling procedure, data collection method a
nd analysis procedure.”
Stage-1
Familiarization with the company and formulation of the objectives.
Stage-2
In this stage the method & survey areas in city were finalized.
Stage-3
In this stage survey instruments i.e. questionnaire form was given a
nd was modified and finalized under the guidance of Area Managers.
Stage-4
The fieldwork was carried out in this stage for data collection, in t
he areas allotted for survey.
Stage-5
In this stage analysis and interpretation was done and conclusions
and suggestions were given for improvements needed in distribution activities.
OBJECTIVES
1. Clarify the differences in motivation to work between manger and worker
exists or not.
2. To study the factor effect motivation between manager and worker.
3. To analyze the differences occur in efficiency between both the parties.
4. To assess whether money and other extra benefit motivate both the partie
s.
RESEACH DESIGN:
Sampling universe : finite
sampling units : managers and worker
Sample size : 20
Sampling technique : judgmental sampling
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS:-
Researchers mainly have a choice of instruments like the following:
Interview
Questionnaire
In collection of primary data, I have used structured questionnaire with close
d ended and by taking interview .
ANALYTICAL TOOLS: -
The used analytical tools were average, percentage, ratio, graphical an
alysis using Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word.
SOURCE OF DATA:-
Primary data:-
The primary data to be selected was based upon the response of the res
pondents to the questionnaire designed. After a lot of discussion with the senio
rs and project guide, the self-designed questionnaire was developed for Primary
Data Collection. The questionnaire consists of closed ended questions. A part of
Questionnaire was targeted to know the personal details of the respondents. Ano
ther part comprised of the self-designed questionnaire and will consist of close
d ended questions with every question having its own importance and meaning.
Target population:-
Managers as well as worker of the particular organization.
Secondary Data:-
The secondary data was collected by referring through web sites, magaz
ines and the final data was analyzed systematically to achieve the desired resul
t.
Secondary data used collected from the sites of the organization, and searched
data from Google.com, CiteHR.com etc.
ANALYSIS OF INTERVIEW
Introduction
First of all I would like to mention that each and every person that I have inte
rviewed has contributed with many interesting aspects regarding work and motivat
ion. In order to present the data that is relevant for my study, I will not exam
ine each person individually. However, I will divide the interviews into two gro
ups, worker and manager. My interviewees have not discussed the questions in exa
ctly the same way, but still considerable similarities can be interpreted within
the answers.
I am aware of the fact that a critical eye is necessary while conducting a resea
rch. However I feel that the interviewed persons have answered in a truthfully w
ay, the reason is probably that I have asked personal and individual questions t
o them, mostly, because I am not interested in company issues or policies how th
e company motivates their employees.
Interestingly, my first observation is that persons working in a manager positio
n are older and have more experience. On the other hand the persons working in t
he worker position are younger and not that experienced. Naturally, this applies
for my study and due to my interviews.
In general, I can see that the interviewed persons perform their work tasks eith
er for the companies’ sake or as a combination between the company and themselves.
The tasks they perform can be viewed as work and not as play because the work t
asks have a distinct purpose. Moreover, due to the fact that the interviewees ge
t paid for their achievements support the discussion regarding work and not play
.
INTERPRETATION:-
From the above graph I can say that in my research work manager are satisfied wi
th the support of the HR department and they HR department also work according t
heir wish as on any decision they all work in a team while when we ask to the wo
rker they are not much satisfied with the hr department as they are totally agre
e that HR department has no keen interest in them and they have not much ability
to change any decision regarding their on wish.
Q6) Do you think that incentives and other benefit will influence your performan
ce?
ITEM MANAGER WORKER
INFLUENCE 93% 100%
DOES NOT INFLUENCE 5% 0%
NO OPINION 2% 0%
INTERPRETATION:-
In my research, I come to know that the extra benefits which are given to the wo
rker 100% affected as they are more concern toward their work or I can say job w
hile manager also influence by the benefit criteria but some managers have diff
erent point of view that they are not exaggerated by the incentives but the rati
o of such type of respond is minimum that it may be count in as nothing.
Q 7) is your company is eager in recognize and acknowledge employee work?
ITEM WORKER MANAGER
STRONGLY AGREE 32% 61%
AGREE 36% 25%
NEUTRAL 28% 8%
DISAGREE 2% 5%
STRONGLY DISAGREE 2% 1%
INTERPRETATION:-
From the study, I approach that manager are strongly believe that the company is
eager and ready to acknowledge the employee worker while in the case of
manager also influence by the benefit criteria but some managers have different
point of view that they are not exaggerated by the incentives but the ratio of
such type of respond is minimum that it may be count in as nothing.
Q 8) Does the organization involve you to decision making are connected to your
department?
ITEM WORKER MANAGER
YES 56% 97%
NO 30% 2%
OCCASIONALLY 14% 1%
INTERPRETATION:-
After the survey I am surprised that in the organization workers also involve in
the decision making because earlier the study I thought that organization does
not involve the worker decision and 97% manager always ready to involve their d
ecision or for the well fare of the company.
FINDINGS
From the whole study I come to know that manager and workers are motivated diffe
rently because both belong to unlike designation and workers are not much suppor
ted by the top management as they believe that these are easily hired and fired
but manager are not treated as like workers.
According to my survey, factors which affect worker is in monetary term while ma
nager are not in the favor yet to some extent they are in fond of money because
it is that trough which they get bread but recognition, name ,and fame are more
important for them.
As far as concern about the efficiency, it is truth that efficiency of the emplo
yee moor depends on motivation, if the employee is not motivated by monetary and
non-monetary term than their efficiency level down.
Through the survey I come to familiar that money and other benefit motivate both
the parties .
CONCLUSION
I would like to present the results I have found during my study. Differences in
what motivate a manger and a worker has been discovered. In this chapter, I wil
l reveal my outcome of the journey, enjoy!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
The whole process of writing my thesis has contributed to a greater knowledge of
motivation to work, especially while studying previous presented theories. From
the interviews I have gain much information regarding the subject and given us
a deeper insight of motivation. All in all my research has made it possible for
me to draw exciting
Before starting to present the different findings for workers and managers, I wo
uld like to say that without an interest for one’s work motivation could be hard t
o define. Luckily, all interviewees participating in my thesis have a huge inter
est within their line of business and the company.
My conclusion of what motivates a worker is, primarily money. They want to recei
ve tangible rewards for their performance, for example bonuses and pay increase
for the same work which can be viewed as money, in one way or another. Moreover,
the craving for material benefits, subsidized lunch, preventive health care, wh
ich can be used to strengthen my argument that money is what motivate workers. C
ertainly, the working climate matters for the persons in worker positions, howev
er I feel that this is not the essential working motivator. My conclusion of wha
t motivates a manager is, working climate, recognition and free time. They exper
ience a positive recognition as a reward as well as working climate, and do not
pay attention to material ones. Moreover, I have discovered how important good r
elationship with colleagues, acknowledge for their work and to create a pleasant
working environment are.
The other factor that motivates a manager is his or her free time, where the per
son wants time for activities other than work. Of course, the managers would not
work for free, they still want to have a realistic pay check, and however money
plays a smaller role for the manager.
To answer my research questions, there are differences in motivation to work bet
ween a manager and a worker. The major difference is money for the workers and r
ecognition, working climate and free time for the managers’ .I imagine that money
will attract people to a job, but recognition and development will keep people.
For final outcome of my research I would like to use a cliché, the grass is always
greener on the other side of the fence. I have reached the conclusion that peop
le always want more. However, the workers want more things and therefore they ur
ge for more money, and that is what drives them forward. On the contrary, the ma
nagers need for money has decrease over the years; they own the material thing t
hey want. Instead, the non material factors as family and friends are fundamenta
l for the manager and that is what drives him or her forward. In addition, what
they want is to create a better working place, make tasks more effective and be
there for The employees, because it can always be better according to them.
LIMITATIONS
SUGGESTIONS
A survey is not complete without the suggestions because when a study is done to
know the reasons of the problem then solutions should be a part of the project:
-
There should be a family environment in the office so workers are more c
o-operative.
Managers must talk to the workers directly to know their problems relate
d to any grievance, frienge benefits etc.
There should be good relation between top management ,middle and lower l
evel management.
There should be organizing a competitive environment toward work so each
and every employee performs the work.
Managers must be involved in the decision making of their department bec
ause they easily understand those needs and wants and as well as the level of mo
tivation itself increase by these type of exercises.
Conclusion
APPENDICES
Interview session is conducted Instructions of analyzing questionnaire
As far as concern the questionnaire I have divided my questionnaire in to two pa
tterns first is interview session and second is questionnaire.
In Interview session I personally meet with the manager and the worker of partic
ular company. I have asked 19 question from the manger and 18 from the worker.
The Likert scale has been chosen for the questionnaire:-
o Strongly agree
o agree
o neutral
o disagree
o strongly disagree
The questionnaire has been given in 3 companies personally with a judgmental sam
pling.
Evaluation is depending on how many employees have same opinion on particular qu
estion.
No. of employee (agree, strongly agree, disagree. and strongly disagree) are div
ided by the total no. of sample size.
ANNEXURE
Books:-
Research Methodology methods & techniques - by C. K. Kothari
Human Resource Management text and cases - by V.S.P. Rao
Human Resource Management - by K. Ashwathappa
Websites:-
http://www.google.co.in/
citeHR.com,HR.com
http://www.rediffmail.com
https://mail.pavnagroup.com
https://mai.bajajallianz.com
http://www.ask.com/
https://www.bankofbaroda.com
Other Sources
Company Prospectus
Q6) Do you think that incentives and other benefit will influence your performan
ce?
a) Influence b) Does not influence
c) No opinion
Q 7) is your company is eager in recognize and acknowledge employee work?
a) Strongly agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly disagree
Q 8) Does the organization involve you to decision making are connected to your
department?
a) Yes
b) No
c) Occasionally
Q 9) Provide the rate:-
Strongly agree 5, Agree 4, Neutral 3, Disagree 2, strongly disagree 1
Number Influencing factor Rating
1 Reasonable periodical increase in salary
2 job security exist in the company
3 Good relation with co-worker
4 Effective performance appraisal system
5 Good safety measure adopted in the organization
6 Performance appraisal activities are helpful to get motivated
Thank you