Professional Documents
Culture Documents
800
790
2008-10
2008-11
2008-12
2009-12
2009-10
2009-11
2010-12
2010-10
2010-11
2010-6
2009-1
2010-4
2010-5
2008-9
2010-1
2010-2
2010-3
2008-7
2008-8
2008-5
2008-6
2009-8
2009-9
2011-1
2008-3
2008-4
2009-5
2009-6
2009-7
2008-1
2008-2
2009-2
2009-3
2009-4
2010-7
2010-8
2010-9
The time from peak to trough was 34 months in New Mexico but
only 25 months for the nation as a whole. However, the rate of
job loss was nearly identical, 6.2 percent for New Mexico and
6.3 percent for the U.S. New Mexico, therefore, lost a similar
proportion of its job base but did so over a longer period of time.
As we begin reporting data for the new year, 2011 appears set to
be the turning point where we start to add jobs again in significant
numbers.
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions
401 Broadway N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87102
Over the month, the Las Cruces economy lost 2,800 jobs, mostly from seasonal declines in government employment. State government
employment slipped by 2,200 jobs, reflecting the end of the semester at New Mexico State University. Retail trade dropped 200 jobs at
the close of the holiday shopping season, while four other industries—manufacturing, information, educational & health services, and
leisure & hospitality—each lost 100 jobs. There were no gaining industries in January.
Over the year, total nonfarm employment for January 2011 remained unchanged in the Las Cruces MSA. This follows over-the-year
gains for each month of 2010 and over-the-year losses for each month of 2009. Five of the 12 industries expanded employment, three
were unchanged, and four lost jobs over the year.
Educational & health services and construction each gained 200 jobs from their year-ago levels, while retail trade, leisure & hospitality,
and miscellaneous other services each added 100. Declining industries were headed up by manufacturing, down 300 jobs, followed by
professional & business services, down 200. The information industry and government each declined by 100 jobs. Among public-sector
components, local government declined by 200 jobs, state government added 100, and federal government remained unchanged over
the year. Three other industries—financial activities; transportation, warehousing & utilities; and wholesale trade—reported no change
to employment levels from last year.
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions
401 Broadway N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87102
Over the month, as is typical for January in Santa Fe, employment growth was weak. January 2011 workforce reductions resulted in
1,500 fewer jobs than were recorded in December. Government lost a total of 300 jobs, with the federal, state, and local divisions each
declining by 100. Retail trade lost 300 jobs at the end of the Christmas shopping season, and educational & health services employment
also fell by 300. Construction employment declined by 200 jobs, and four other private-sector industries each lost 100.
Over the year, the rate of job growth for Santa Fe was 0.7 percent, representing a gain of 400 jobs. This is the fourth consecutive month
of over-the-year job gains, following a 26-month period of sustained job losses. At its worst, in late 2009, the number of jobs was down
by as much as 6.9 percent over a 12-month period. At that time, huge losses in construction and downtime in the information industry
coincided to cause unprecedented declines.
Three industries—educational & health services, professional & business services, and construction—reported over-the-year employment
gains for January. The educational & health services industry contributed 400 jobs to the total, with the other two adding 100. The
information industry was the only component to continue to report declines, down 200 jobs from last year. All other industries reported
unchanged employment from their year-ago levels.
New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions
401 Broadway N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87102
Over the month, the Farmington area posted a typical January loss of 1,100 jobs. Both the private sector and public sectors lost jobs
over the month.
Over the year, total employment in the Farmington area increased by 100 jobs or 0.2 percent. Last month ended a two-year run of
job losses that began in December 2008. The goods-producing industries reported a 200-job decrease in employment from year-ago
levels, as they slowly recover from earlier devastating loses. Private service-providing industries were up 400 jobs from last year. The
government sector reported the loss of 100 jobs, with local government down 200, state government unchanged, and federal government
up 100.
New Mexico – Seasonally Adjusted Total Nonfarm Employment
Labor Force, Employment, Growth Rankings
Unemployment & Unemployment Rate New Mexico and United States
January January %
Civilian Un- Unadj. State Rank 2010 2011 Change Change
Labor Employ- employ- Rate Rate North Dakota 1 360.1 377.9 17.8 4.9%
Force ment ment % % Alaska 2 302.9 311.3 8.4 2.8%
Vermont 3 293.4 301.3 7.9 2.7%
1990 711,891 663,698 48,193 6.8% Texas 4 10,118.5 10,360.0 241.5 2.4%
1991 719,243 667,698 51,545 7.2%
Arkansas 5 1,134.1 1,152.2 18.1 1.6%
1992 735,447 680,463 54,984 7.5%
1993 755,053 700,258 54,795 7.3% Idaho 5 581.6 590.7 9.1 1.6%
1994 776,827 725,387 51,440 6.6% Kentucky 7 1,725.9 1,752.4 26.5 1.5%
1995 798,621 744,557 54,064 6.8% Nebraska 7 916.8 930.7 13.9 1.5%
1996 812,862 751,826 61,036 7.5% Utah 7 1,159.3 1,176.7 17.4 1.5%
1997 822,627 768,596 54,031 6.6%
Oregon 10 1,562.8 1,585.3 22.5 1.4%
1998 835,879 783,661 52,218 6.2%
1999 839,988 793,052 46,936 5.6% Wyoming 10 271.1 274.9 3.8 1.4%
2000 852,293 810,024 42,269 5.0% Connecticut 10 1,569.1 1,590.5 21.4 1.4%
2001 863,682 821,003 42,679 4.9% Pennsylvania 13 5,470.9 5,543.9 73.0 1.3%
2002 871,512 823,191 48,321 5.5% Oklahoma 13 1,496.3 1,515.2 18.9 1.3%
2003 888,468 835,835 52,633 5.9%
Maine 15 572.0 579.1 7.1 1.2%
2004 901,833 849,970 51,863 5.8%
2005 913,453 866,349 47,104 5.2% Mississippi 15 1,070.9 1,083.9 13.0 1.2%
2006 924,516 886,708 37,808 4.1% Michigan 15 3,756.1 3,801.6 45.5 1.2%
2007 933,616 901,704 31,912 3.4% Delaware 18 698.3 706.3 8.0 1.1%
2008 952,217 909,809 42,408 4.5% Illinois 18 5,462.4 5,524.4 62.0 1.1%
2009 942,273 876,218 66,055 7.0%
West Virginia 18 724.7 732.8 8.1 1.1%
2010 JAN 946,360 869,464 76,896 8.1% 8.3% Ohio 18 4,905.0 4,957.8 52.8 1.1%
FEB 949,344 871,702 77,642 8.2% 8.5% New Hampshire 18 607.6 614.0 6.4 1.1%
MAR 951,919 873,638 78,281 8.2% 8.4% Hawaii 18 579.6 585.7 6.1 1.1%
APR 953,519 874,626 78,893 8.3% 8.1% South Dakota 24 388.2 392.2 4.0 1.0%
MAY 954,066 874,589 79,477 8.3% 8.2%
Indiana 24 2,715.1 2,741.3 26.2 1.0%
JUN 953,926 873,890 80,036 8.4% 8.8%
JUL 953,605 873,011 80,594 8.5% 9.0% Tennessee 26 2,557.1 2,581.1 24.0 0.9%
AUG 953,727 872,597 81,130 8.5% 8.7% Louisiana 26 1,856.6 1,873.5 16.9 0.9%
SEP 954,325 872,719 81,606 8.6% 8.2% Iowa 28 1,432.2 1,444.0 11.8 0.8%
OCT 955,118 873,107 82,011 8.6% 8.2% District of Columbia 28 399.9 403.1 3.2 0.8%
NOV 955,788 873,432 82,356 8.6% 8.4% California 28 13,694.6 13,802.9 108.3 0.8%
DEC 956,479 873,840 82,639 8.6% 8.2%
Virginia 28 3,558.5 3,586.4 27.9 0.8%
2011 JAN 955,763 872,948 82,815 8.7% 8.8% South Carolina 28 1,760.4 1,774.2 13.8 0.8%
FEB Wisconsin 33 2,658.2 2,678.0 19.8 0.7%
MAR Washington 33 2,723.0 2,743.2 20.2 0.7%
APR Colorado 33 2,174.8 2,190.1 15.3 0.7%
MAY
United States 127,309.0 128,183.0 874.0 0.7%
JUN
JUL Minnesota 36 2,570.3 2,586.7 16.4 0.6%
AUG New York 37 8,339.8 8,385.3 45.5 0.5%
SEP Montana 38 414.4 416.2 1.8 0.4%
OCT Florida 38 7,116.9 7,147.6 30.7 0.4%
NOV
Massachusetts 38 3,115.1 3,127.6 12.5 0.4%
DEC
North Carolina 41 3,797.2 3,802.4 5.2 0.1%
Maryland 41 2,446.6 2,449.1 2.5 0.1%
# CHANGE FROM Georgia 41 3,769.9 3,772.1 2.2 0.1%
Month Ago -716 -892 176 0.1% 0.6% Missouri 44 2,590.2 2,590.8 0.6 0.0%
Year Ago 9,403 3,484 5,919 0.6% 0.5%
Rhode Island 44 444.5 444.6 0.1 0.0%
2 Yrs. Ago 5,120 -22,247 27,367 2.9% 2.8%
3 Yrs. Ago 11,079 -38,201 49,280 5.2% 5.2% Alabama 44 1,840.1 1,840.1 0.0 0.0%
Arizona 44 2,362.5 2,362.0 -0.5 0.0%
% CHANGE FROM New Jersey 48 3,776.3 3,761.3 -15.0 -0.4%
Month Ago -0.1% -0.1% 0.2% New Mexico 48 789.4 785.9 -3.5 -0.4%
Year Ago 1.0% 0.4% 7.7% Kansas 50 1,300.7 1,294.6 -6.1 -0.5%
2 Yrs. Ago 0.5% -2.5% 49.4%
3 Yrs. Ago 1.2% -4.2% 147.0% Nevada 50 1,104.0 1,098.2 -5.8 -0.5%
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Employment numbers are not seasonally adjusted.
Employment numbers are in thousands.
New Mexico Labor Force Estimates – Not Seasonally Adjusted
PRELIMINARY JANUARY 2011 REVISED DECEMBER 2010 REVISED JANUARY 2010
Labor Force Empl. Unemp. Rate Labor Force Empl. Unemp. Rate Labor Force Empl. Unemp. Rate
STATEWIDE 944,311
0 861,093
0 83,218
0 8.8%
0.0% 956,0650 877,2870 78,7780 8.2%
0.0% 936,658 859,085 77,573 8.3%
Albuquerque MSA 405,088 368,533 36,555 9.0% 409,834 374,929 34,905 8.5% 402,916 369,347 33,569 8.3%
Bernalillo 310,744 283,499 27,245 8.8% 314,409 288,419 25,990 8.3% 309,108 284,125 24,983 8.1%
Sandoval 56,374 50,949 5,425 9.6% 57,007 51,833 5,174 9.1% 55,990 51,061 4,929 8.8%
Torrance 6,966 6,184 782 11.2% 7,063 6,291 772 10.9% 6,942 6,197 745 10.7%
Valencia 31,005
0 27,902
0 3,103
0 10.0%
0.0% 31,3540 28,3860 2,9680 9.5%
0.0% 30,875 27,963 2,912 9.4%
Farmington MSA 55,836
0 50,496
0 5,340
0 9.6%
0.0% 56,441
0 51,444
0 4,9970 8.9%
0.0% 55,577 50,267 5,310 9.6%
Las Cruces MSA 92,001
0 83,573
0 8,428
0 9.2%
0.0% 94,685
0 86,934
0 7,7510 8.2%
0.0% 90,620 83,204 7,416 8.2%
Santa Fe MSA 76,434
0 70,716
0 5,718
0 7.5%
0.0% 77,335
0 71,909
0 5,4260 7.0%
0.0% 75,460 70,023 5,437 7.2%
Catron 1,500 1,329 171 11.4% 1,442 1,286 156 10.8% 1,539 1,366 173 11.2%
Chaves 27,169 24,829 2,340 8.6% 27,557 25,284 2,273 8.2% 27,345 25,183 2,162 7.9%
Cibola 12,667 11,616 1,051 8.3% 12,723 11,737 986 7.7% 12,315 11,380 935 7.6%
Colfax 6,663 6,042 621 9.3% 6,661 6,069 592 8.9% 6,488 5,935 553 8.5%
Curry 21,667 20,412 1,255 5.8% 22,100 20,897 1,203 5.4% 21,724 20,530 1,194 5.5%
De Baca 818 771 47 5.7% 807 764 43 5.3% 857 803 54 6.3%
Eddy 28,987 27,341 1,646 5.7% 29,006 27,388 1,618 5.6% 28,648 26,840 1,808 6.3%
Grant 11,521 10,316 1,205 10.5% 11,498 10,335 1,163 10.1% 11,570 10,165 1,405 12.1%
Guadalupe 1,797 1,581 216 12.0% 1,826 1,617 209 11.4% 1,750 1,575 175 10.0%
Harding 378 356 22 5.8% 416 393 23 5.5% 365 343 22 6.0%
Hidalgo 2,595 2,371 224 8.6% 2,614 2,397 217 8.3% 2,501 2,279 222 8.9%
Lea 27,952 26,032 1,920 6.9% 28,358 26,446 1,912 6.7% 27,624 25,257 2,367 8.6%
Lincoln 10,779 9,987 792 7.3% 10,939 10,190 749 6.8% 10,574 9,783 791 7.5%
Los Alamos 10,295 9,883 412 4.0% 10,379 9,976 403 3.9% 10,256 9,841 415 4.0%
Luna 12,438 9,639 2,799 22.5% 12,419 10,000 2,419 19.5% 11,717 9,382 2,335 19.9%
McKinley 27,807 24,980 2,827 10.2% 27,746 25,078 2,668 9.6% 27,409 24,917 2,492 9.1%
Mora 1,995 1,635 360 18.0% 1,990 1,657 333 16.7% 1,975 1,680 295 14.9%
Otero 26,478 24,427 2,051 7.7% 26,840 24,844 1,996 7.4% 26,302 24,342 1,960 7.5%
Quay 3,995 3,586 409 10.2% 3,993 3,622 371 9.3% 4,017 3,657 360 9.0%
Rio Arriba 20,090 18,156 1,934 9.6% 20,522 18,691 1,831 8.9% 19,877 18,161 1,716 8.6%
Roosevelt 9,329 8,731 598 6.4% 9,368 8,806 562 6.0% 9,172 8,597 575 6.3%
San Miguel 13,192 11,929 1,263 9.6% 13,381 12,237 1,144 8.5% 13,115 12,006 1,109 8.5%
Sierra 5,767 5,288 479 8.3% 6,128 5,679 449 7.3% 5,731 5,304 427 7.5%
Socorro 9,439 8,789 650 6.9% 9,559 8,944 615 6.4% 9,446 8,879 567 6.0%
Taos 17,771 15,998 1,773 10.0% 17,658 16,004 1,654 9.4% 17,879 16,288 1,591 8.9%
Union 1,861 1,751 110 5.9% 1,839 1,729 110 6.0% 1,890 1,752 138 7.3%
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0