Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
EAA report “Sustainability of the European aluminium industry 2006”
MOVING UP TO ALUMINIUM EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION
CONTENTS
8. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 15
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION
F = FW + FR + FG + FA
1.Aerodynamic
resistance
r
FW = c v2
2 • W•A•
4.Acceleration
resistance
FA = km• m • a
2.Rolling
resistance
FR = kR • m • g • cos a
3.Gradient
(a
resistance
FG = m • g • sin a
b
T hese figures are material-independent and slightly vary depending on specific factor such as vehicle type, driving
cycle, etc.. They assume the following average values for petrol and diesel:
• The combustion of 1 litre of fuel emits 2.5kg of CO2 at the car exhaust pipe
• 1 litre of fuel represents 2.8kg of CO2 from well-to-wheel
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION
35.00
170
30.00
150
130 25.00
%
20.00
kg Al per car
110
90 15.00
Opel Vectra
Citroen C5
70 10.00 Toyota Prius Peugeot
Mini
Citroen C3 Renault Laguna
1.2. EUROPEAN
50 VEHICLES ARE GETTING HEAVIER - THE WEIGHT SPIRAL Nissan Micra
Opel Corsa
Ford Mondeo
Chrysler PT
5.00 Ford Fiesta Nissan Tino
Despite its impact on fuel consumption, the average mass of European vehicles has dramatically increased,Skoda
asFabia Peugeot 307
Fiat Stilo
illustrated30
in Figure 2. The weight increase is basically due to more stringent legislative requirements and changing
1975 1980 1985 1990 extra1995 0.00
customer demands (growing vehicle size, comfort2000
& safety2005
devices,2010 2015
etc) that, in turn, have caused an
0 50 100 150 2
increase weight of other components (e.g. engines, Year
transmission, brakes) to reach the envisaged performance
level. This phenomenon is known as the “weight spiral”. kg alu
1350
1250 Fiat
Stillo
Toyota
Corolla
Seat
Toledo Honda
1150 Civic
Opel
Astra
Ford
Focus
Citroen
1050 ZX Golf IV
Renault
Megane
weight (kg)
Fiat
Golf III Brava
Toyota
950 Corolla
Toyota
Peugeot
306
Corolla
Citroen Ford Renault Opel
GS Escort Peugeot 19 Astra
Fiat
Ritmo 305 Fiat
Renault Tipo
850 Opel 9
Kadett Opel
Kadett
Opel Ford
Kadett Golf III
Escort
750
Golf I
650
70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 02 04
year
2.1. ACCELERATION •R
educing body weight lowers the 2.4 DRIVING COMFORT
centre of gravity improving the
Keeping the car acceleration car’s stability and reducing the Saving weight on unsuspended
performance constant, which is risk of roll-over. parts like wheels increases driving
generally reflected by the power- comfort.
to-weight ratio, saving weight • T he optimal weight distribution
allows downsizing of the power between front and rear axle being
train (engine, transmission, axle 50:50 and the front axle being
differential etc…) and thus provides usually overloaded, using light-
additional weight savings. weight aluminium components
for the front parts of cars is
Keeping the power train un- particularly beneficial.
modified, reduced weight increases
the power-to-weight ratio and
therefore improves acceleration.
2.2. BRAKING
Keeping braking power constant,
light-weighting shortens braking
distance.
Keeping the braking performance
constant, light-weighting allows
downsizing of the brakes, which
offers fur ther weight saving
potential.
2.3. HANDLING
Road handling is improved by light-
weighting in many different ways:
•H
andling of a lighter car is easier
in demanding driving situations.
Figure 3
For niche models, full aluminium bodies allow saving 30-40% weight, and between 70 and 140kg, depending
on the size of the car.
c
elative to the weight of substituted parts
R
d
Doors, bonnet, wings, boot
e
Wheel rims are presently not always weight-optimised. However, 50% weight saving is achievable.
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION
3.3. SECONDARY WEIGHT savings can exceed 50%. For A recent study by Knibb,
SAVINGS example, in the case of the Audi Gormezano & Partners (KGP) in
A2, the intensive use of aluminium cooperation with the European
Keeping a car’s per formance allowed direct weight savings of Aluminium Association shows that
constant, primary weight savings 134kg that allowed 75kg secondary the amount of aluminium used in
allow downsizing of other car parts weight savings thanks to drivetrain, new European cars has risen from
(powertrain, brakes, fuel tank, motor and chassis downsizing. 50kg in 1990 to 132kg in 2005 and
crash management systems etc…), is predicted to grow by another
leading to so called “secondary 25kg by 2010.
weight savings”. 3.4. TODAY’S CARS CONTAIN
In case the primary weight savings 132KG OF ALUMINIUM The study is based on the analysis
achieved on a defined vehicle are Besides well-known aluminium- of car models representing a
small (i.e. when only little aluminium intensive cars like the Audi A8, European production volume of 15
is used) secondary weight savings which contains about 520kg of million units in 2005. Key results
are not likely to be achieved by car aluminium or the Jaguar XJ, many are summarized in Figure 4.
manufacturers. cars contain significant amounts of
On the other side, when aluminium light metals.
is intensively used, secondary weight
Figure 6: Alumin
Figure 5: Evolution of aluminium content in European cars 40.00
35.00
170
30.00
150
130 25.00
%
20.00
kg Al per car
110
90 15.00
70 10.00 Min
Citroen C3
50 Nissan Micra
Opel Corsa
5.00 Ford Fiesta
Skoda Fabia Pe
Fiat Sti
30
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 0.00
0 50
Year
1350
Figure 6: Aluminium content of some European cars
ars 40.00 1400
1250
35.00 Fiat
Audi A2 Stillo 1200
Toyota
30.00 Corolla 1000
Seat
Toledo Honda
weight [kg]
1150
25.00 Civic
Opel 800
Astra
%
20.00 Ford
Focus 600
Citroen
1050
15.00 Audi A4
ZX Golf IV
Renault 400
Opel Vectra Megane
Renault VelSatis
weight (kg)
Citroen C5
Mercedes E class
10.00 Toyota Prius Peugeot 607 Fiat
Citroen C3
Mini
Renault Laguna
Toyota
Golf III Brava 200
Nissan Micra Ford Mondeo
950 Opel Corsa Chrysler PT Corolla
Toyota
Peugeot
5.00 Ford Fiesta Nissan Tino 306
Skoda Fabia Ford Peugeot 307 Corolla 0
Citroen Fiat Stilo Renault Opel
GS Escort
Fiat Peugeot 19 Astra R
005 2010 2015 0.00 Ritmo 305 Fiat
0 Renault Tipo
850 50 100 150
9
200 250 300 350
Opel
Kadett Opel
kg aluKadett
Opel Ford
Kadett Golf III
Escort
Figure 6: Aluminium content of some European cars
750
Golf I
Fiat 650
Stillo
70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 02 04
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION
1400
Primary state-of-the-art Minimun secondary
1200 weight reduction weight saving Maximum secondary
weight saving
1000
weight [kg]
600 1229
1003
928 887
400 785
200
0
Reference Car Primary Primary latest- Upper final Lower final
state-of-the-art technology weight weight
350 weight weight (Aluminium Car)(Aluminium Car)
Figure 8
electro-magnetic
iron
separation
non-magnetizable components:
aluminium, heavy metals,
high grade steel,
non-metallic components
Windshield Instrument
Surround Panel Suspension
Structures Structures Subframes
Electrical
Distribution Exterior
Systems Closure
Panels
Engine
Blocks
Wheels
Bumper
Systems Body Structure
and Components
Seat Frames
Heat
Exchangers Driveshafts
Air Brake
Compressor Components
Pistons
Engine Suspension
Subframes Components
4.1. CRASH DESIGN IS To increase the chances of survival 4.3. VEHICLES COMPATIBILITY
COMPLEX in an accident, vehicles include
L ast but not least, vehicle
a stiff, stable passenger cell to
Today’s vehicles have to fulfil safety strongly depends on the
ensure survival space and sur-
dif ferent and more and more compatibility between vehicles or
rounding deformation zones where
stringent crash test requirements obstacles involved in an accident.
the crash energy can be absorbed
(e.g. EuroNCAP, IIHS etc.). Two of The first important thing in case
to a maximum amount. The high
the most important vehicle crash of a crash is that the obstacle
rigidity of an aluminium structure
tests are the front and the side makes contact with the vehicle
compared to a steel design is the
impact. The front crash load path at the height of its bumpers. The
result of the higher material thick-
starts at the bumper and proceeds compatibility of bumper heights
ness (aluminium components are
via the longitudinal beams to the of all road users is therefore
generally about 50% thicker) and
centre area of the vehicle. For a a key criterion for safety. This is a
in particular the possibility to use
side impact, the load path starts material independent requirement,
closed multi-hole extrusions and
at the doorsill and the B-pillar f and but lightweight aluminium designs
high quality die castings of sophisti-
proceeds via the crossbeams in the offer the possibility to improve this
cated design (which also allows the
floor and the roof area to the other aspect. It is important to then
elimination of joints). Depending
side of the vehicle. So, in these consider the respective masses
on the available package space, it
two examples very different body of the different vehicles. The use
is therefore still possible to improve
components are a part of the load of a heavier vehicle is generally
the rigidity of the entire structure
paths. This shows the complexity safer for its occupants, but it is
while maintaining a weight reduction
of the crash design for vehicle body significantly more dangerous for the
of up to 40 – 50 %. The same
structures. lighter road users. Light-weighting
principles also apply to pedestrian
all vehicles while keeping their size
But car safety is not only a question protection where properly designed
would improve the survival rate for
of the applied material; even more aluminium front end structures and
all road users.
important is the design and assembly bonnets help to prevent injuries
concept. In the development of the and reduce the risk of fatality.
body, it is most important to find
a suitable compromise between
structural stiffness, crash energy
absorption capability and further
body requirements (e.g. package, etc.).
f
I.e. the pillar between the front and rear door connecting the floor structure and the roof .
tent of some European cars
1000
weight [kg]
Primary latest technology
800
weight reduction
600 1229
1003
Audi A4 928 887
Opel Vectra 400 785
Citroen C5 Renault VelSatis
Mercedes E class
us Peugeot 607
Renault Laguna 200
Ford Mondeo
ysler PT
n Tino
0
Reference Car Primary Primary latest- Upper final Lower final
state-of-the-art technology weight weight
150 200 250 300 350 weight weight (Aluminium Car)(Aluminium Car)
refiner/remelter
5.2. LIFE-CYCLE CO2 SAVINGS Sector Through Weight Reduction cycle cost, fuel consumption and
and the Application of Aluminium” CO2 emissions.
We assume a driving distance of
recently published by the
200.000km and 20% secondary Regulatory & fiscal initiatives aiming
International Aluminium Institute
weight savings. to stimulate the demand for low
and downloadable from www.
world-aluminium.org CO2 emitting cars are therefore
Based on the 2 million tons of
necessary.
aluminium components put on the
road in 2005: 5.3. COST CONSIDERATIONS Several of today’s aluminium
Assuming an average fuel cost of applications are already affordable
• e ach kg of aluminium provided an
1.20€ per litre, every kilogram (i.e. between 2 and 4€ per kg
average light-weighting of 1kg.
saved on the mass of a European light-weighting) and easy to apply
•1
kg of aluminium in a car reduces car saves more than 8€ over (hang-on parts), so that a fast
CO2 emissions by 20kg during its 200.000km through fuel saving. upgrade to aluminium is possible.
use phase.
However, today’s price premium T he industr y is also working
•1
kg of aluminium in a car reduces accepted by car manufacturers on reducing the cost of other
CO2 emissions by 19kg during its does in general not exceed 4€ aluminium applications presently
whole life-cycle. per kg saved on family cars. This used in sport and luxury cars, so
is because first car buyers are that they could also find their place
Several detailed case studies can in smaller cars.
be found in the paper “Improving focused on purchase price and do
Sustainabilit y in the Transpor t not care enough about total life
g
T his figure does not include aluminium losses within smelting and refining processes.
h
Aluminium Recycling in Europe, the Road to High Quality Products (OEA-EAA 2007)
i
n end-of-life recycling rate of 95% is assumed for aluminium and competing materials
A
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION 13
6. A
LUMINIUM AND COMPETITIVENESS OF
EUROPEAN INDUSTRY
The European Automotive industry, in close co-operation with the European Aluminium industry, has developed
and introduced numerous innovative aluminium light-weighting solutions. A key success factor is the product-
specific development and selection of the proper aluminium alloys and the consistent reproduction of the required
quality level for the various product forms (sheets, extruded sections, castings, forgings, etc.). Most important is
also the full exploitation of aluminium-specific design possibilities and the introduction of manufacturing methods
highly suited for forming, machining, assembly and surface finishing of aluminium components. Intensive joint
research and development activities have enabled the practical use of safe and cost efficient light-weight
aluminium concepts both in high volume production and in the manufacturing of small series and niche vehicles.
These solutions can be applied with little adaptation across all car models.
The European producers have taken technological global leadership in the light-weighting of passenger cars with
aluminium. Europe is the leader for aluminium body applications, in chassis and suspension, bumper systems,
etc., to name just a few. An important element proved to be the joint R&D efforts of both the Automotive and
the Aluminium industry, often facilitated by the support of the European Commission.
Figure 11 further illustrates this fact, taking the example of car body applications.
Europe should therefore safeguard its competitive advantage and remain the pioneer of vehicle
light-weighting.
Aluminium in cars EUROPEAN ALUMINIUM ASSOCIATION 14
7. ALUMINIUM SUPPLY
8. CONCLUSION
Because the average mass of passenger cars has dramatically increased since the 70’s and because vehicle weight
directly impacts fuel consumption, light-weighting is necessary more than ever to reduce CO2 emissions. 100kg
mass reduction achieved on a car saves 9 grams of CO2 per km at the exhaust pipe.
Aluminium is the ideal light-weighting material as it allows a weight saving of up to 50% over competing
materials in most applications without compromising safety.
Today’s European cars contain an average of 132kg of aluminium components. In the short term, many additional
aluminium applications could be realised without significant re-engineering and extensive cost impact (e.g. by
the use of more aluminium hang-on parts). This could easily reduce the average weight of the cars produced in
Europe by 40kg.
The industry is working on reducing the cost of other aluminium applications, in particular in the body structure
and for chassis and suspension parts, presently used in sport and luxury cars, so that they can also find their
place in smaller cars.
As a long term vision, an “Alu-maximised” small family car could be 30-35% lighter after primary and maximum
secondary weight savings.
Together, the European Automotive and Aluminium industries are worldwide leaders in respect to the development
and application of innovative, safe and cost efficient light-weighting aluminium solutions. They should safeguard
this competitive advantage and remain the pioneer of vehicle light-weighting.