Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sol.
Advantages and Disadvantages of International Trade
Advantages to consider:
•
SOL - In this new millennium, few executives can afford to turn a blind eye to global
business opportunities. Japanese auto-executives monitor carefully what their
European and Korean competitors are up to in getting a bigger slice of the Chinese
auto-market. Executives of Hollywood movie studios need to weigh the appeal of an
expensive movie in Europe and Asia as much as in the US before a firm commitment.
The globalizing wind has broadened the mindsets of executives, extended the
geographical reach of firms, and nudged international business (IB) research into some
new trajectories. One such new trajectory is the concern with national culture.
Whereas traditional IB research has been concerned with economic/ legal issues and
organizational forms and structures, the importance of national culture – broadly
defined as values, beliefs, norms, and behavioural patterns of a national group – has
become increasingly important in the last two decades, largely as a result of the
classic work of Hofstede (1980). National culture has been shown to impact on major
business activities, from capital structure (Chui et al., 2002) to group performance
(Gibson, 1999). For reviews, see’ Boyacigiller and Adler’ (1991) and ‘Earley and
Gibson’ (2002).
The purpose of this Unit is to provide a state-of-the-art review of several recent
advances in culture and IB research, with an eye toward productive avenues for
future research. It is not our purpose to be comprehensive; our goal is to spotlight a
few highly promising areas for leapfrogging the field in an increasingly boundary-less
business world. We first review the issues surrounding cultural convergence and
divergence, and the processes underlying cultural changes. We then examine novel
constructs for characterizing cultures, and how to enhance the precision of cultural
models by pinpointing when the effects of culture are important. Finally, we examine
the usefulness of experimental methods, which are rarely employed in the field of
culture and IB. A schematic summary of our coverage is given in Table 2.1, which
suggests that the topics reviewed are loosely related, and that their juxtaposition in
the present paper represents our attempt to highlight their importance rather than
their coherence as elements of an integrative framework.
Sol.
Structure of World Trade Organization (WTO)
The WTO’s overriding objective is to help trade flow smoothly, freely, fairly and
predictably.
It does this by:
· Administering trade agreements
· Acting as a forum for trade negotiations
· Settling trade disputes
· Reviewing national trade policies
· Assisting developing countries in trade policy issues, through technical assistance
and training programs
· Cooperating with other international organizations
Structure
The WTO has nearly 150 members, accounting for over 97% of world trade. Around 30
others are negotiating membership.
Decisions are made by the entire membership. This is typically by consensus. A
majority vote is also possible but it has never been used in the WTO, and was
extremely rare under the WTO’s predecessor, GATT. The WTO’s agreements have
been ratified in all members’ parliaments.
The WTO’s top level decision-making body is the Ministerial Conference which meets
at least once every two years.
Below this is the General Council (normally ambassadors and heads of delegation in
Geneva, but sometimes officials sent from members’ capitals) which meets several
times a year in the Geneva headquarters. The General Council also meets as the
Trade Policy Review Body and the Dispute Settlement Body.
At the next level, the Goods Council, Services Council and Intellectual Property
(TRIPS) Council report to the General Council.
Numerous specialized committees, working groups and working parties deal with
the individual agreements and other areas such as the environment, development,
membership applications and regional trade agreements.
Secretariat
The WTO Secretariat, based in Geneva, has around 600 staff and is headed by a
director-general. Its annual budget is roughly 160 million Swiss francs. It does not
have branch offices outside Geneva. Since decisions are taken by the members
themselves, the Secretariat does not have the decision-making role that other
international bureaucracies are given with. The Secretariat’s main duties are to
supply technical support for the various councils and committees and the ministerial
conferences, to provide technical assistance for developing countries, to analyze
world trade, and to explain WTO affairs to the public and media.
The Secretariat also provides some forms of legal assistance in the dispute settlement
process and advises governments wishing to become members of the WTO.
the WTO is different from some other international organizations such
as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. In the WTO, power is not
delegated to a board of directors or the organization’s head.
When WTO rules impose disciplines on countries’ policies, that is the outcome of
negotiations among WTO members, the rules are enforced by the members
themselves under agreed procedures that they negotiated, including the possibility of
trade sanctions. But those sanctions are imposed by member countries, and
authorized by the membership as a whole. This is quite different from other agencies
whose bureaucracies can, for example, influence a country’s policy by threatening to
withhold credit.
Reaching decisions by consensus among some 150 members can be difficult. Its main
advantage is that decisions made this way are more acceptable to all members. And
despite the difficulty, some remarkable agreements have been reached. Nevertheless,
proposals for the creation of a smaller executive body – perhaps like a board of
directors each representing different groups of countries – are heard periodically. But
for now, the WTO is a member-driven, consensus-based organization.
Highest authority: the Ministerial Conference
So, the WTO belongs to its members. The countries make their decisions through
various councils and committees, whose membership consists of all WTO members.
Topmost is the ministerial conference which has to meet at least once every two
years. The Ministerial Conference can take decisions on all matters under any of the
multilateral trade agreements.
Second level: General Council in three guises
Day-to-day work in between the ministerial conferences is handled by three bodies:
· The General Council
· The Dispute Settlement Body
· The Trade Policy Review Body
All three are in fact the same – the Agreement Establishing the WTO states they are
all the General Council, although they meet under different terms of reference.
Again, all three consist of all WTO members. They report to the Ministerial
Conference.
The General Council acts on behalf of the Ministerial Conference on all WTO affairs. It
meets as the Dispute Settlement Body and the Trade Policy Review Body to oversee
procedures for settling disputes between members and to analyze members’ trade
policies.
Third level: councils for each broad area of trade, and more back to top
Three more councils, each handling a different broad area of trade, report to the
General Council:
· The Council for Trade in Goods (Goods Council)
· The Council for Trade in Services (Services Council)
· The Council for Trade – Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS
Council)
As their names indicate, the three are responsible for the workings of the WTO
agreements dealing with their respective areas of trade. Again they consist of all WTO
members. These three also have the subsidiary bodies.
Sol. -
The Five-Element Product Wave
As illustrated in Figure 4.5, the wave model employs design engineering, process
engineering, product marketing, production, and end-of-life activities as elements.
The first wave is associated with the "A" version of a product or service, and survives
through the traditional PLC introduction and growth phases. A second wave begins
with the "B" version, the markedly improved second model. It starts just before the
traditional life cycle maturity stage and lives until sales decline to a point at which an
EOL decision must be made.
Note that design engineering has a peak of activity level at each upgrade. Process
engineering activity shadows that of design engineering, as system changes will be
contemplated and made to facilitate the changes made in the product or service.
Product marketing also has activity level spikes that closely match engineering design
activity, lagged somewhat for product introduction. Production has one activity peak
that results from demand management and production planning through master
production scheduling.
Finally, the EOL curve peaks at each redesign. The last wave begins shortly before
original production ceases and ends when the product is no longer manufactured or
supported by the EOL Company or division. The EOL element requires that a decision
be made about the preceding version at each major redesign: continue production,
make a short-term run of spares, keep blueprints active so that parts can be made as
ordered, enter into a manufacturing and support agreement with another entity, or
discontinue production.
For the sake of parsimony, Figure 4.5 shows only a two-product model ("A" and "B"
versions). In reality, there may be hundreds of significant redesigns. The wave effect
comes from the fact that the process repeats for the successful firm, forming swells in
design engineering, process engineering, product marketing, and manufacturing
curves before the final crest at EOL activity. The five-element product wave, or FPW,
uses trigger points, rather than time, as the horizon over which the element curves vary.
Changes in magnitude, represented by the vertical axis, result from differing activity
levels within the five elements. Simple changes in levels of dollar or unit product sales, in
and of themselves, do not necessarily determine the trigger points. Rather, the varying
activity levels are a direct result of product introductions and redesigns that, from the
outset, must take into account company strategy, core capabilities, and the state of the
competitive environment. For example, a product with strong sales may be redesigned in
a preemptive strike against competitors, further distancing that product from the
competition, such as with Caterpillar’s innovative high-drive bulldozers.
That the five-element wave is grounded in reality becomes apparent when considering
the recent research that suggests product introduction cycles are being compressed.
Bayus (1994) claims that knowledge is being applied faster, resulting in increasing
levels of new product introductions. Yet since product removals are not keeping pace
with introductions, there are an increasing number of product variations on the
market. Slater (1993) observes that product life cycles are growing shorter and
shorter. Vesey (1992) reports that the strategy for the 1990s is speed to market and
discusses the pressures the market is exerting to shorten product introduction lead
times. Regardless of whether life cycles are actually being compressed or knowledge is
simply being applied faster, it is apparent that firms are increasing the speed with
which they bring their products to market. The effect of this is a compression of the
design engineering, process engineering, production, and product marketing elements
of the wave model. (The EOL curve may remain unchanged because accelerated
introductions do not necessarily affect EOL efforts.) The five-element wave clearly
shows the inefficiency of traditional "over-the-wall" systems as speed to market
increases. As the elements compress, more and more information is thrown over the
wall. Recipients find themselves with less and less time to take action. Taken to the
extreme, in-baskets, phone lines, conference rooms, desks, and floors are soon
gridlocked and littered with unanswered correspondence and things to do. Forget
quality; production itself grinds to a halt.
The solution is to maximize the advantage of the relationships within the five-
element wave and work in concurrent teams, as illustrated in Figure 6. That way,
responsibility is shared throughout the system. Members from each discipline optimize
the system. The method tears down barriers between departments and speeds the
introduction process, thus decreasing costs. The focal point becomes the customer,
rather than the task. The system is totally interactive and bound together. Each
element is connected to all of the others and is focused on the customer. (Note that
the authors have taken a great deal of artistic license here! No meaning should be
attached to the actual measure of overlap area in Figure 4.6.)
What is the recent experience with teams? There is evidence that using concurrent
design teams speeds the product to market and provides substantial savings. Boeing
expects that concurrent design will save some $4 billion in the development of its 777
airliner. Westinghouse recently suggested that concurrent engineering would
eliminate 200 duplicate processes in a project that consisted of 600 using traditional
over-the-wall approaches. Ford’s Team Taurus was able to cut a full year out of
model turnaround. In addition, design changes required after initial production began
were reduced by some 76 percent.
The strength of the five-element product wave is the fact that it illuminates critical
decision points in the life of a product or service. The interrelationships of the
elements clearly illustrate the benefit of working product introductions, design
changes, and end-of-life decisions in teams. This is particularly true in today’s rapidly
compressing environment of speeding products to market. Furthermore, the model is
flexible and may be expanded or contracted to include those functional areas
relevant to the production team. Thus, whether a given firm’s product is a service or
a manufactured good, the five-element wave is a powerful tool that can be deployed
to accelerate effective decision making in markets demanding ever-increasing levels
of speed and agility.
Sol.
Within six months of announcing it would invest $4.5 million to establish its new
software development center in Northern Ireland, IMR was up and running with more
than one-third its target staff. "The fast start-up of the Belfast facility reaffirms our
confidence to locate in Northern Ireland," said Sanan. "The success to date in building a
quality work force has surpassed our expectations and opens up new ambitions for our
interests in Northern Ireland." According to Arthur "Bro" McFerran, president of IMR (NI)
Ltd., the company is hiring 12 to 18 programmers a month in Northern Ireland and is well
on its way to meeting its staffing goal of 300 by 1999. McFerran credited Northern
Ireland’s Training & Employment Agency (T&EA) with helping place the company’s
staffing on the fast track. "The T&EA not only has helped us to identify and recruit
qualified software graduates from Northern Ireland’s universities, it is also assisting us
with a unique initiative to bring additional sources of high quality talent to the company,"
McFerran said. Innovation In Training Impressed by the number and quality of
information technology graduates from the region’s universities, IMR recognized an
untapped resource in the well-educated, versatile graduates of other fields in Northern
Ireland. Working with the T&EA, IMR developed "IMR Academy," an intensive 20-week
training program at the Belfast Institute of Further and Higher Education, to expand the
skills of qualified applicants who are not computer software graduates, but who are
equally well-educated in other Disciplines and who have demonstrated aptitude for
learning computer software programming. Tom Scott of the T&EA said IMR applicants
are assessed throughout the program and those who successfully complete the course
are awarded a National Computing Certificate and full-time employment with IMR.
Approximately 40 trainees have already participated in the program. "IMR is extremely
pleased with the T&EAs ability to design and deliver a training program customized to
our needs, and one that is delivering us an impressive pool of incremental programming
talent," McFerran said. Smart And Available "The recent software investments by IMR
and other companies provide a new opportunity for Northern Ireland’s computer
graduates," McFerrin said. Recruitment research by IMR indicates that traditionally,
nearly half of the region’s computer graduates have been forced to seek jobs outside
Northern Ireland due to the lack of available information technology positions.
Now IT graduates have the chance to find good jobs in Northern Ireland, and
graduates from other fields can take advantage of the IMR Academy training program
to get a head start on a career in the growing software sector.
McFerrin said. Recruitment research by IMR indicates that traditionally, nearly half of
the region’s computer graduates have been forced to seek jobs outside Northern
Ireland due to the lack of available information technology positions.
Competitive Advantage
Northern Ireland recently has attracted information technology – based investments
from other multinational companies such as BT, Fujitsu, Liberty Mutual Group,
Seagate Technology, STB Systems and UniComp. These companies cite Northern
Ireland’s work force and favorable cost base in their decisions to locate in the region.
"The availability of high-quality graduates combined with the region’s competitive
operating costs and attractive incentives made Northern Ireland the best possible
location for STB," said Richard W. Cooke, STB’s director of engineering operations.
With salaries and fringe costs for well trained software engineers in Northern Ireland
approximately 50 percent lower than costs for US engineers, and low employee
turnover and favorable rates for office space, the overall annual per capita
operational costs to develop high quality software can be significantly less compared
with these same costs in the United States.
Typical starting salaries for IT graduates in Northern Ireland are $22,000 to $25,000
annually. At less than three percent annually, Northern Ireland’s employee turnover
rate is a fraction of the rates typically experienced in other parts of Europe and the
United States. Annual costs per square foot for office space, exclusive of property
taxes and service charges, range from as low as $5 per square foot in some
development areas, to approximately $14 in Belfast. These costs can be as much as 50
percent lower than office space costs in other European cities.
Q.1 Evaluate the monetary system and currency markets in international business
management. (10 marks)
Sol.
The IMF is an international organization of 185 member countries. It was established
to promote international monetary cooperation, exchange stability, and orderly
exchange arrangements; to foster economic growth and high levels of employment;
and to provide temporary financial assistance to countries to help ease balance of
payments adjustment.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is the intergovernmental organization that
oversees the global financial system by following the macroeconomic policies of its
member countries, in particular those with an impact on exchange rate and the
balance of payments. It is an organization formed with a stated objective of
stabilizing international exchange rates and facilitating development through the
enforcement of liberalising economic policies[1][2] on other countries as a condition for
loans, restructuring or aid.[3] It also offers highly leveraged loans, mainly to poorer
countries. Its headquarters is in Washington, D.C., United States.
Organization and purpose
IMF "Headquarters 1" in Washington, D.C. The International Monetary Fund was created
in July 1945, originally with 45members,[4] with a goal to stabilize exchange rates and
assist the reconstruction of the world's international payment system. Countries
contributed to a pool which could be borrowed from, on a temporary basis, by countries
with payment imbalances (Condon, 2007). The IMF was important when it was first
created because it helped the world stabilize the economic system. The IMF works to
improve the economies of its member countries.[5] The IMF describes itself as "an
organization of 187 countries (as of July 2010),[6][7] working to foster global monetary
cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high
employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty". With the exception
of Cuba (left in 1964),[8] Taiwan (expelled in 1980),[9] North Korea, Andorra, Monaco,
Liechtenstein, Tuvalu and Nauru, all UN member states participate directly in the IMF.
Member states are represented on a 24-member Executive Board (five Executive
Directors are appointed by the five
members with the largest quotas, nineteen Executive Directors are elected by the
remaining members), and all members appoint a Governor to the IMF's Board of
Governors.[1
Q.2 a. Mention the different entry strategies to enter international markets. (4
marks)
Sol.
Entry Strategies
Methods of entry
With rare exceptions, products just don’t emerge in foreign markets overnight – a firm
has to build up a market over time. Several strategies, which differ in aggressiveness,
risk, and the amount of control that the firm is able to maintain, are available:
· Exporting is a relatively low risk strategy in which few investments are made in the
new country. A drawback is that, because the firm makes few if any marketing
investments in the new country, market share may be below potential. Further, the
firm, by not operating in the country, learns less about the market (What do
consumers really want? Which kinds of advertising campaigns are most successful?
What are the most effective methods of distribution?) If an importer is willing to do a
good job of marketing, this arrangement may represent a "win-win" situation, but it
may be more difficult for the firm to enter on its own later if it decides that larger
profits can be made within the country.
· Licensing and franchising are also low exposure methods of entry – you allow
someone else to use your trademarks and accumulated expertise. Your partner puts
up the money and assumes the risk. Problems here involve the fact that you are
training a potential competitor and that you have little control over how the business
is operated. For example, American fast food restaurants have found that foreign
franchisees often fail to maintain American standards of cleanliness. Similarly, a
foreign manufacturer may use lower quality ingredients in manufacturing a brand
based on premium contents in the home country.
· Contract manufacturing involves having someone else manufacture products while
you take on some of the marketing efforts yourself. This saves investment, but again
you may be training a competitor.
· Direct entry strategies, where the firm either acquires a firm or builds operations
"from scratch" involve the highest exposure, but also the greatest opportunities for
profits. The firm gains more knowledge about the local market and maintains greater
control, but now has a huge investment. In some countries, the government may
expropriate assets without compensation, so direct investment entails an additional
risk. A variation involves a joint venture, where a local firm puts up some of the
money and knowledge about the local market.
It is also a document of transfer, being freely transferable but not an egot iable
instrument in the legal sense, i.e. it governs all the legal aspects of physical
carriage, and, like acheque or other negotiable instrument, it may be
endorsed affecting ownership of the goods actually being carried. This matches
everyday experience in that the contract a person might make with a
commercial carrier like FedEx for mostly airway parcels, is separate from any
contract for the sale of the goods to be carried; however, it binds the carrier
to its terms, irrespectively of who the actual holder of the B/L, and owner of
the goods, may be at a specific moment.
•
The letter of credit can also be source of payment for a transaction, meaning
that redeeming the letter of credit will pay an exporter. Letters of credit are
used primarily in international trade transactions of significant value, for deals
between a supplier in one country and a customer in another. They are also
used in the land development process to ensure that approved public facilities
(streets, sidewalks, storm water ponds, etc.) will be built. The parties to a
letter of credit are usually abeneficiary who is to receive the money, the
issuing bank of whom the applicant is a client, and the advising bank of whom
the beneficiary is a client. Almost all letters of credit are irrevocable, i.e.,
cannot be amended or canceled without prior agreement of the beneficiary,
the issuing bank and the confirming bank, if any. In executing a transaction,
letters of credit incorporate functions common to giros and Traveler's cheques.
Typically, the documents a beneficiary has to present in order to receive
payment include a commercial invoice, bill of lading, and documents proving
the shipment was insured against loss or damage in transit. However, the list
and form of documents is open to imagination and negotiation and might
contain requirements to present documents issued by a neutral third party
evidencing the quality of the goods shipped, or their place of origin.