Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CERTIFIED BY:
Date: Date:
“I hereby declare that I have read this thesis and in my opinion this thesis is
sufficient in terms of scope and quality for the award of the degree of Bachelor of
Engineering (Chemical)”
Signature : …………………………
Date : …………………………
iv
OCTOBER 2010
ii
DECLARATION
I declare that this thesis entitled “Recovery of Silver from Photographic Waste Using
Extractant Impregnated Resin (EIR)” is the result of my own research except as cited
in the references. This thesis has not been accepted for any degree and is not
concurrently submitted in candidature of any other degree.
Signature : …………………………
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am also very thankful to my friends with under same supervisor for giving
ideas to help me complete the research in the time being. We shared our sharing joys
and frustration during this time. Thank you very much. Special thanks are also
dedicated to Encik Yasin for helping me in sample analyzing.
Finally, I thank my beloved parent, Tengku Malim Busu and Salmah and
siblings for their understanding and support in almost everything. Sorry for my
careless love for all of you during the time I accomplished this research.
v
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE i
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xv
1 INTRODUCTION
1.4 Summary 4
viii
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction 5
2.2.1 Introduction 6
2.4.1 Introduction 10
2.4.2 Electrolysis 11
2.4.7 Evaporation 15
2.5.1 Introduction 17
resin (EIR) 23
2.7 Summary 26
3 METHODOLOGY 27
3.1 Introduction 27
3.2 Chemicals 27
Resin (EIR) 30
3.3.5.1 pH determination 31
3.3.5.2 Silver content analysis using
Atomatic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) 31
5.1 Conclusions 51
REFERENCES 54
APPENDICES 57
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE
PAGE
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO TITLE
PAGE
adsorption capacity 19
complexing agent E 24
Amberlite XAD-2 38
type of EIRs 45
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Ag - Silver
Cd(II) - Cadmium
Cu(II) - Copper
Fe(III) - Ferum
Ni(II) - Nickel
cP - Centipoice
pHe - pH equilibrium
Co - Initial concentration
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
RO - Reverse osmosis
IR - Infrared
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE
PAGE
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Silver is very useful metal in industrial field. The demand for silver comes
primarily from three areas; industrial uses, jewelry and silverware, and photography.
These industries represent 95 percent of annual silver consumption. Silver‟s superior
properties make it a highly desirable industrial component in manufactured products.
Silver‟s artistic beauty and status make it one of the most romantic and sought after
precious metals (Northwest Territorial Mint, 2005). As a result of high demand of
silver, new technology needs to be developed to get silver from other sources due to
the limitation of silver resource.
From the article by Crystal et al. (1982), the survey by Goldman Environment
Consultant Inc. gave response about a revealing indication of how photographers
dispose of photographic. Most of them (76% of the respondents) do not employ any
form of silver recovery. This result was suspected by knowledgeable industry
informants, but has not previously been confirmed by survey. So, many
environmental organizations concern to invent the management of photochemical
waste. In order to reduce the silver loadings to the environment, effort need to be
devoted to both finding a more cost-effective disposal method and to changing the
attitudes of photographers about the importance of silver recovery.
Therefore, silver recovery from photochemical waste needs appropriate and
effective methods that can be implemented to make compliance with the waste
2
discharge regulations as well as the economic advantages due to the increasing price
of the precious silver. In the earlier research, there were many methods to recover
silver for the solution such as electrolysis recovery, metallic replacement, chemical
precipitation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and evaporation.
First, the objective of this research is to modify the polymer adsorbent and
characterized EIR which is modified adsorbent. Amberlite XAD-2 and XAD-7 were
used as matrix polymer (adsorbent) for EIR synthesis. Both resins were impregnated
with Cyanex 302 by using ethanol and kerosene as its solvents. The synthesized
EIRs were then characterized. SEM analysis was used in studying the effect of the
impregnation to the resin morphology. In order to identify the successfulness of the
EIR impregnation process, FTIR analysis was also been determined. For this
analysis, some of the functional group regarding to the Cyanex302 chemical
structure could be determined.
3
Lastly, this research has purpose to determine the selectivity of the EIR into
real photographic waste. The EIR adsorbent that gave highest performance of
adsorption was selected as adsorbent in photographic waste. The adsorption process
for real photographic waste was done similar to silver solution.
1.4 Summary
The photographic waste has many hazardous contaminations that can cause
environmental problems and shortage resource of precious metals. Therefore,
several silver recovery methods have been reported to overcome the problems as
pollution controlled. In this study, silver recovery method using Extractant
Impregnated Resin (EIR) is chosen as an effective method because of its advantages
compared to other methods.
5
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
The highly used of heavy metal in industrial and other processes have
increased rapidly and caused large amount of waste. Thus, this scenario is causing
several serious pollutions in the environment. The presence of heavy metal in the
environment causes adverse effects to human health. Therefore, the toxic heavy
metal should be removed before discharge to environment. However, some of the
effluents may contain a small amount of precious metal such as gold, platinum and
silver. These metals are very valuable materials and only exist at a small amount in
the earth.
Besides being used as jewellery, precious metals also are widely used in the
industrial process such as electronic manufacturing, currency, dental filling and
photographic. Recycling of those waste sources is one of the best methods for
fulfilling a high demand of the precious metals. Several studies have been developed
for recovery of precious metal from several wastes including electrolysis, metallic
replacement, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and evaporation
(Nakiboglu et al., 2001).
6
2.2.1 Introduction
Many well known uses of silver involve its precious metal properties,
including currency, decorative items and mirrors. The contrast between the
appearances of its bright white color in contrast with other media makes it very
useful to the visual arts. It has also long been used to confer high monetary value as
objects (such as silver coins and investment bars) or make objects symbolic of high
social or political rank.
Jewelry and silverware are traditionally made from sterling silver (standard
silver), an alloy of 92.5% silver with 7.5% copper. In the US, only an alloy
consisting of at least 92.5% fine silver can be marketed as "silver" (thus frequently
stamped 925). Sterling silver is harder than pure silver, and has a lower melting point
(893 C) than either pure silver or pure copper. Britannia silver is an alternative
hallmark-quality standard containing 95.8% silver, often used to make silver
tableware and wrought plate. With the addition of germanium, the patented modified
alloy Argentium Sterling Silver is formed, with improved properties including
resistance to firescale. Treister, Mikhail YU (Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to
Siberia, 2004).
7
Silver can be alloyed with mercury, tin and other metals at room temperature
to make amalgams that are widely used for dental fillings. To make dental amalgam,
a mixture of powdered silver and other metals is mixed with mercury to make a stiff
paste that can be adapted to the shape of a cavity. The dental amalgam achieves
initial hardness within minutes but sets hard in a few hours.
Table 2.1: Chemical properties in photographic waste (Othman et. al., 2005).
Table 2.2: Physical properties in photographic waste (Othman et. al., 2005).
pH 8.02
Density (g/ml) 1.04
Viscosity (cP) 0.77
2.4.1 Introduction
Silver, one of the precious and noble metals, is used in large quantities for
many purposes, particularly in the photographic industry. Silver recovery methods
implemented are electrolysis, metallic replacement, chemical precipitation, ion
exchange, reverse osmosis and evaporation (Nakiboglu et al., 2001).
Figure 2.1: Electrolysis cell for electrolysis of silver recovery ( The North
Carolina Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance,
1982)
This method consists of replacing the metallic silver with a less valuable base
metal such as iron, zinc, or copper. As an example, if steel wool is inserted into the
exhausted fixer solution, the silver in solution is replaced by the iron, and the silver
accumulates on the bottom of the container in the form of sludge. The sludge are
removed and refined to reclaim the silver. The fixer must be discarded after silver
recovery by this method. Metallic replacement requires little capital expenditure for
equipment and requires only a few simple plumbing connections. The equipment
consists of a plastic container, plastic-lined steel or stainless steel drum filled with
metal, usually steel wool, and some plastic hose and plumbing connections. Silver is
recovered when the silver-bearing solution flows through the cartridge and makes
contact with the steel wool. The iron goes into solution as an ion, and the metallic
silver is released as a solid to collect in sludge at the bottom of the cartridge or is
deposited on the steel wool. The yield a user can expect is determined by the silver
concentrations in solution, the volume of solution that is run through the cartridge,
and the care with which the operation is managed. When silver is no longer
effectively removed, the silver-bearing sludge is sent to a refiner who will refine it
and pay the customer for the recovered silver (The North Carolina Division of
Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance, 1982).
12
highly toxic hydrogen sulfide gas (The North Carolina Division of Pollution
Prevention and Environmental Assistance, 1982).
Ion exchange is generally used for effective recovery of silver from rinse
water or other dilute solutions of silver. The ion exchange method involves the
exchange of ions in the solution with ions of a similar charge on the resin. The
soluble silver thiosulfate complex is exchanged with the anion on the resin. This is
the exhaustion step and is accomplished by running the solution through a column
containing the resin. For large operations, the next step is the regeneration step in
which the silver is removed from the resin column with a silver complexing agent
such as ammonium thiosulfate. This step includes several backwashes to remove
particulate matter and excess regenerant before the next exhaustion step is initiated.
Silver is then recovered from the thiosulfate regenerant with an electrolytic recovery
cell. For smaller operations an alternative to performing the regeneration step on-site
would be to remove the resin from the column and send it to a refiner for silver
reclamation. Important factors in considering an ion exchange system for silver
recovery are: selection of the resin, flow rate of the silver-bearing solution, column
configuration and selection of the regenerant. It has been demonstrated that the use
of ion exchange can reduce the silver concentration in photographic effluent to levels
in the range of 0.5 to 2 mg/l and can recover over 98 percent of the available silver.
If this method is used as a tailing method after primary recovery by electrolysis,
levels in the range of 0.1 to 1 mg/l can be obtained (The North Carolina Division of
Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance, 1982).
14
Figure 2.3: Ion exchange of silver recovery ( The North Carolina Division of
Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance, 1982).
Reverse osmosis (RO) is also used for dilute solutions. RO uses high
pressure to force the silver-bearing solution through a semipermeable membrane to
separate larger molecules, such as salts and organics1 from smaller molecules like
water. The extent of separation is determined by membrane surface chemistry and
pore size, fluid pressure and wastewater characteristics. For removal of silver, after-
fix rinse water is flow-equalized, filtered and pumped through an RO unit. Once the
silver is separated from the water in this manner it can be recovered by conventional
means such as metallic replacement, electrolytic recovery or chemical precipitation.
Operating problems include fouling of the membrane and biological growth (The
North Carolina Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance,
1982).
15
2.4.7 Evaporation
2.5.1 Introduction
pore and particle size distribution directly affect the adsorption performance. Bajpai
and Rohit (2007) stated that smaller particle sizes will have higher surface area for
contact with adsorbates. Moreover, pore size and pore volume play also a big role
during the adsorption process. Adsorbents which have higher pore volume also can
give adsorb high capacity of metal.
For the adsorbate, the parameters that may affect the adsorption performance
include concentration, pH, molecular structure, molecular polarity, and competitive
of the adsorbate in adsorption process. In term molecular structure, some adsorbent
will be selective to some particular chemical structure (Crini and Badot, 2008;
Slejko, 1985). In the case of adsorbate in liquid phase, the pH and concentration of
the adsorbate solution play an important role in determining adsorption capacity.
a b
Adsorption kinetic models present relationship between the solute uptake rate
and time (important in treatment process design). Kinetics study is one of the
important characteristics for metal adsorption behavior. It determines the rate of
adsorption which is a mass transfer of adsorbate from fluid to solid which is
influenced by several factors. Mass transfer as third fundamental transfer occurs in
the adsorption process. The factors are really related to diffusion since it was one of
the mechanisms of adsorption process which include diffusion to the external
surface, deposition on the surface, diffusion in the pores, and diffusion along the
surface (Dabrowski, 2001). From the kinetics study, the time dependence of such
system and the required contact time for sorption process to be completed can be
20
determined (Augustine et al., 2007). This data is the most importance, especially
when designing batch sorption systems (Augustine et al., 2007).
Adsorbents are used usually in the form of spherical pellets, rods, moldings,
or monoliths with hydrodynamic diameters between 0.5 and 10 mm. They must have
high abrasion resistance, high thermal stability and small pore diameters, which
results in higher exposed surface area and hence high surface capacity for effective
adsorption. The adsorbents must also have a distinct pore structure which enables
fast transport of the gaseous vapors. There are four classes of adsorbents that are
being used in industry such as oxygen containing compound, carbon based
compound, and polymer based compound and biomaterial compound.
are shared rather than transferred. Basically, there are two methods which include
post functionalization and in-situ synthesis. Post functionalized synthesis also
known as two step synthesis where the first step involves preparing the polymer
matrices, and then followed by immobilization of ligands. In-situ synthesis involved
incorporation of organofunctional groups during the matrix support preparation.
investigated and used for this type of separations, but also suffer from significant
drawbacks. Reactive extraction usually has problems with phase separation due to
the emulsion formation. To increase the contact area it is necessary to vigorously
mix the phases which leads to the loss of reagent (Jerabek et al., 1996)
In addition, reactive extraction is not very feasible for the recovery of species
present in low concentration due to the high excess of solvent/reactant required and
not very suitable for recovering species from viscous solutions. Concerning
adsorption, nonfunctionalized resins tend to have low capacity and low selectivity.
Better performing chelating, ion exchange or enantiomer selective resins are very
expensive due to their difficult and time consuming preparation. Therefore, the need
exists for the development of a new technique able to fulfill the targeted
requirements. The suitable technique should avoid the mentioned disadvantages of
the conventional techniques but maintain their advantages. For instance, adsorption
is rather suitable for processing dilute solutions, the used equipment is relatively
simple and easy to operate and there is no problem of liquid/solid phase separation.
On the other hand, reactive extraction has high capacity and high selectivity toward
the target compounds and usually offers high mass transfer rates. Additionally, a
reagent in a “free solution” is much cheaper than chemically functionalized
adsorbents (Babic et al., 2008).
EIR is also useful in extraction of rare and valuable metals. The investigation
of extraction of gold from solutions containing zinc and copper has been attempts to
develop polymeric adsorbents that can be applied to the recovery of precious metals
from aqueous solution. Two methods were used in selecting polymeric adsorbents
which either commercially available ion-exchange resins or hybrid absorber prepared
by impregnation and physically immobilization of selective and specific reagents
conventionally used in solvent extraction onto high specific surface polymeric
materials (Kabay et al., 2010).
2.7 Summary
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents all chemicals and procedures used in this study. The
research was conducted using chemicals obtained from various suppliers. The
synthesis, characterization and functionalization procedures were adopted as reported
in the literature. This chapter comprises mainly i) chemicals; ii) EIR synthesis
procedures; iii) EIR characterization procedures, iv) silver adsorption and desorption
procedures; and v) analytical procedures, which were described in some details in the
following sub-sections.
3.2 Chemicals
The chemicals used were Cyanex 302 that ordered from Fluka, kerosene also
from Fluka, ethanol also was obtained from Fluka, Amberlite XAD-2 from Supelco
and XAD-7 was purchased from Merck, Germany. All reactants are manufacture
grade and used as received. Chemical properties of the reagents were shown in table
3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. All chemicals were used directly as supplied. Deionized water used
throughout this work was produced by the Purite Water System (U.K) which is
available in our laboratory.
28
Properties
Physical appearance Light yellow (mobile liquid)
Chemical formula C16H35OPS
Molecular weight (g/mol) 306.49
Assay (%) 85
Density (g/cm3) 0.93
Temperature (oC) 337
XAD-2 and XAD-7 were used as supplied. Before the used of XAD-2 and
XAD-7, these materials were washed first with diionized water water to remove the
salts (NaCl and Na2CO) and excess monomer present on the resins. The resin was
shaking with deionized water using incubator shaker model Innova 4080 for 1 hour
(250 rpm) at room temperature (27oC). Then, the water was removed by filtration.
The resin was rinsed again with deionized water for three to four times and lastly it
was rinsed with diluents (ethanol or kerosene). After filtration, the resins were dried
at 50oC in the oven for 24 hours. Then, resins were vacuum using roto-vapor
vacuum for 5 hours to remove excess diluents and moisture before further
experiment.
1g of cleaned Amberlite XAD-2 and XAD-7 were put in contact with 5ml of
dilute Cyanex 302 for 48 hours under agitation using incubator shaker model Innova
4080. After that, the samples were filtered and rinsed with deionized water and its
solvent. After filtration, the solvent and moisture were removed by drying in 50oC
oven and lastly vacuumed for 5 hours. After impregnation, the EIRs were produced
as XAD2-Cyanex302 (Kerosene), XAD2-Cyanex302 (Ethanol), XAD7-Cyanex302
(Kerosene) and XAD2-Cyanex302 (Ethanol).
30
For pH effect study, the adsorption experiment was done for EIR XAD2-
Cyanex302 (Kerosene), XAD7-Cyanex302 (Kerosene), pure Amberlite XAD-2 and
pure Amberlite XAD-7. Adsorption process was done as above procedure but pH
was varies at 2.80, 4.61, 7.76 and 9.35 for each samples. pH equilibrium will
measured after 3 days of adsorption process. The amount of silver extracted for
each samples got from AAS analysis.
31
3.3.5.1 pH determination
The pH of the silver solution was determined using pH meter (Mettler Toledo
Delta 320 pH meter). Calibration was carried out at 2 point calibration using pH 4.01
and pH 10.00 buffer solutions every time before pH measurement. The pH
measurement accuracy was ±0.005 pH unit.
The silver calibration curve was obtained by plotting absorbance versus silver
standard concentrations having concentrations between 10-50 ppm, which are within
the linear working range of the silver measurement. All data presented in this thesis
were an average of triplicate measurement results. For the low Ag(II) concentration
(e.g. ppb), the Ag(II) concentration was measured using a continuous Hydride
Generation/Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric method.
Flame Air-Acetylene
3.5 Summary
The materials and procedures presented in this chapter were designed based on
objectives and scopes presented in Chapter 1. The procedures used in this research are
based on the previous researchers reported in the literature unless stated otherwise. All
the experimental data was collected, analyzed and discussed in Chapter 4.
34
CHAPTER 4
4. 1 Introduction
In purpose to get best model of extractant impregnated resin (EIR) for silver
recovery from photographic waste, detail observation in choosing several important
parameters in EIR synthesis and adsorption must be carried out through the research.
In finding good extractant, adsorbent and diluents, several early studies on
conventional silver extraction process. The screening process was based on their
chemical structure, chemical properties and physical properties.
Resin adsorbents used in this research are Amberlite XAD-2 and Amberlite
XAD-7. Both adsorbents have different monomer component and characteristics.
XAD-2 resin is hydrophobic adsorbent (nonpolar) with styrene DVB as chemical
structure. XAD-7 resin is an adsorbent with intermediate polarity with acrylic as
chemical structure. For those characteristics, there is difference result of
performance of adsorption that had been shown in Section 4.3.
Pure XAD-2
2924.36 1602.79
EIR XAD-2-
Cyanex302 (Ethanol)
2952.38
1600.00
EIR XAD-2-
Cyanex302 (Kerosene)
2953.25
1633.56
1148.39
4000
Pure XAD-
7
1600.00
2924.36
EIR XAD-7-
Cyanex302 (Kerosene)
1639.16
2953.75
1148.07
EIR XAD-7-
Cyanex302 (Ethanol)
2952.38
1600.00 P=O bond
C-H bond
C=C bond
4000
cm-1
However, only EIRs with its extractant Cyanex 302 diluted with kerosene
showed the additional peak. IR spectra of pure amberlite XAD-2 and both EIRs
showed strong adsorption band at 2924.36 cm-1, 2952.38 cm-1, 2953.25 cm-1
respectively due to C-H group in Cyanex302 and styrene DVB. XAD-7 and both
EIRs showed strong adsorption band at 2924.36 cm-1, 2953.75 cm-1, 2952.38 cm-1
respectively due to C-H group in Cyanex302 and acrylic acid It cannot determined
that Cyanex302 present in the EIRs. The most obvious peak that showed the existing
of Cyanex302 in EIRs is at 1148.39 cm-1 which was found at EIR XAD2-Cyanex302
(kerosene) and 1148.07cm-1 at EIR XAD7-Cyanex302 (kerosene). This strong
adsorption band indicated the functional group of P=O in Cyanex302. The peak for
S-H group in Cyanex 302 cannot be seen in IR spectra of EIR because the adsorption
band is too weak. This information confirmed the success of impregnation
Amberlite XAD-2 and XAD-7 with Cyanex 302 by solvent kerosene.
(a)
(b)
From the figure 4.5 (a) and (b), there is no difference in the surface structure
of EIR from its original Amberlite XAD-2. XAD-2 has smaller pore size compared
to XAD-7 as stated in table 3.3. Thus, the surface of impregnated resin XAD-2
cannot see clearly through this analysis.
42
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.7: Scanning electron microscope pictures of (a) Pure Amberlite XAD-7 and
(b) EIR XAD7-Cyanex302 (kerosene) (magnification 100x)
Figure 4.6(b) show that the surface of EIR has a distinct „skin'. This structure
explained that Cyanex302 extractant was impregnated in the pore of Amberlite
XAD-7. Thus, the result analysis confirmed the result of FTIR analysis in the
selection of EIR.
43
The quantity of Ag(I) adsorbed onto the EIR phase (Qe, mg/g) was calculated
using Eq. 4.1.
where Co is the initial concentration of the Ag(I) solution (mg/l), C e is the final
concentration of the Ag(I) solution, V the Ag(I) solution volume (l) and m is the
mass of EIRs used (g). Molecular weight of silver is 107.8682.
44
Figure 4.8: Silver adsorption process from silver solution by different type of EIRs
(Experimental conditions: Cyanex302=0.05M, agitation speed=250rpm, T=27oC,
pH=7.82)
From the result, it shows that EIR with ethanol diluents cannot perform well
because the impregnation of EIR was not completely done. It is because of the high
dielectric constant value of ethanol which is 24.3 compared to kerosene that has very
low dielectric constant of 2.0-2.2. The study by Sekine and Hesegawa, 1977 stated
45
that lower dielectric constant, the better adsorption performance. Dielectric constant
indicates the polarity of the diluents. Interaction of the diluents with extractant can
result in lower extraction coefficient for metal ions. Therefore, extraction metals
increase with an increase in the polarity of the diluents.
EIR with polymer resin XAD-7 show a better performance than XAD-2
although just a little bit. This would be the effect from surface area of both
adsorbents. XAD-7 has a larger surface area than XAD-2 with 450m2/g and 300m2/g,
respectively. The better performance of EIR XAD-7 is also due to its polarity.
Amberlite XAD-2 is hydrophobic adsorbent while Amberlite XAD-7 is adsorbent
with intermediate polarity which can function well in aqueous solution.
Figure 4.9 shows the adsorption performance of EIR and pure resin at various
pH systems. The adsorption of Ag(I) by EIRs were higher compared to pure
adsorbent resins at varies pH of silver solution.
However, the pattern of the adsorption of silver does not show same pattern
with general effect of pH on metal extraction (Ritcey and Ashbook, 1984) as
illustrated by Figure 4.10. At low pH values, it is expected that the adsorption
performance will be low due to protonation of metal and at high pH, the adsorption
also decreases as a result of hydrolysis of the metal. However, in this study, the
result shows adsorption do not primarily dependent on pH for metal-extractant
complex formation, but rather on factors like anion concentration in the in the
aqueous solution.
46
Figure 4.10: General effect of pH on metal extraction (Ritcey and Ashbrook. 1984)
47
Kinetic adsorption results also provide the information about the adsorption
rates. The rate increased rapidly in the first 360 minute, after that the adsorption rate
started gradually to become slower as increasing contact time until it achieving the
maximum adsorption capacity. The initial faster rate may be due to the availability
of the adsorbents surfaces to adsorbed Ag(I). According to Smith (1970), the
adsorption kinetics depends on the surface area of the adsorbents. As the time
increases, the available surface for Ag(I) ions adsorption become limited, hence the
rates of absorbability become slower.
48
From figure 4.12, sodium and potassium metal does not have any extraction
while extraction of iron is less than 0.6mmol/g. Silver has highest amount extracted
which is 1.6mmol/g. This means that EIR XAD7- Cyanex302 (kerosene) with
optimum parameters was selective towards silver as discussed in the section 4.2 and
4.3.
49
Concentration (ppm)
Metal
Before After
Ag 833.2 654.2
K 3172 3172
Na 1771 1771
Fe 1026 961.3
4.6 Summary
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Conclusions
Silver is one of the most valuable metal exist in the earth. The concentration
of this metal in photographic waste is quite high. Therefore, the recovery of silver
metal from photographic waste is become necessary. Adsorption using Extractant
Impregnated Resin (EIR) is the suggested method that can be implemented in the
photographic waste treatment before discharge.
towards silver metal over the other metals. On the other hand, adsorbent XAD-7 was
chosen that have large surface area and intermediate polarity. Diluent kerosene was
helping the adsorption by having low dielectric constant that less interaction with
extractant and easy to vaporize.
The adsorption process at varies pH shows that pH does not affect the
adsorption performance since extractant- metal complex formation is not primarily
dependent on pH. Kinetic study of Ag(I) adsorption process show that the
adsorption achieved equilibrium at 34 hour. In the real photographic waste,
adsorption by EIR XAD7-Cyanex302 (kerosene) show highest adsorption capacity
and selectivity towards Ag(I) metal.
This study stumbled upon several interesting problem which can be subjected
for future research. Therefore, further studies in a few aspects related to this research
could be carried for improvement and modification of this model of study:
iii) Desorption process of silver from EIR does not carried out in this study. So,
silver extracted from photographic waste become waste. Thus, desorption
process will be carried out to prevent another environmental problem.
53
REFERENCES
Burghoff, B., Zondervan, E. and de Haan , A.B. (2009). Phenol extraction with
Cyanex 923: Kinetics of the Solvent Impregnated Resin Application. J.
React. Funct. Polym. 69: 264-271.
Navarro, R., Saucedo, I., Nunez, A., Avila, M. and Guibal, E. (2008).
CadmiumExtraction from Hydrochloric Acid Solution XAD-7 Impregnated
With Cyanex921. J. React. Funct. Polym. 68: 557-571.
Juang, R.S. and Lin, H.C. (1994). Metal Sorption with Extractant-Impregnated
Macroporous Resins. 1. Particle Diffusion Kinetics. J. Chem. Technol.
Biotechnol. 62: 132-140.
Babic, K., van der Ham, L. and de Haan, A. (2006). Recovery of Benzaldehyde from
Aqueous Streams Using Extractant Impregnated Resins. J. React. Funct.
Polym. 66: 1494 1505.
Farmer, J.C., Pekala, R.W., Wang, F.T., Fix Alan, D.V., Volpe, M., Dietrich, D.D.,
Siegel, W.H. and Carley, J.F. (1996). Electrochemical and Photochemical
Treatment of Aqueous Waste Streams. Spectrum '96 Nuclear and
Hazardous Waste Management International Topical Seattle, WA.(August
18-23,1996).
Nakiboglu, N., Toscali, D. and Nisli, G. (2001). A Novel Silver Recovery Method
from Waste Photographic Films with NaOH Stripping. J. Chem. 27: 127-
133.
Burghoff, B., Goetheer, E.L.V. and de Haan, A.B. (2008). Solvent Impregnated
Resins for the Removal of Low Concentration Phenol from Water. J. React.
Funct. Polym. 68: 1314-1324.
Jerabek, K., Hankova, L., Strikovsky, A.G. and Warshawsky, A. (1995). Solvent
Impregnated Resins: Relation Between Impregnation Process and Polymer
Support Morphology I. Di-(2-ethylhexyl)dithiophosphoric Acid. J. React.
Funct. Polym. 28: 201-207.
Babic, K. (2008). Extractant Impregnated Resins for the Recovery of Aldehydes and
Chiral Resolution. ISEC 2008, Tucson, Arizona, US. (2008).
Othman, N., Goto, M. and Mat, H. (2005). Solvent Extraction of Metals from Liquid
Photographic Waste using Acidic Extractants. J. Technol. 42: 25-34.
Wakui, Y., Ndiaye, S.A., Matsunaga, H., Yokoyama, T. and Akiba, K. (2007).
Extraction of Arsenic(III) with Macroporous Resin Impregnated with Bis(2-
ethylhexyl) ammonium Bis(2-ethylhexyl)-dithiocarbamate. J. Anal. Sci.
14(2): 299-303.
Brahmmananda Rao, C.V.S., Suresh, A., Srinivasan, T.G. and Vasudeva Rao, P.R.
(2003). Tricyclohexylphosphate- A Unique Member in the Neutral
Organophosphate Family. J. Solv. Extr. Ion Exch. 21(2): 221–238
Cocalia, V.A. and Rogers, R.D. (2007). Ionic Liquid Impregnated Resins in Solid-
Liquid Separations. J. ECS Trans. 3(35): 123–134.
55
Belfer, S., Korngold, E. and Egozy, Y. (1984). Uranium Recovery from Phosphoric
Acid with Selective Resins. J. Ion Exch. Technol. 736–742.
Kabay, N., Gizli, N., Demircioglu, M., Yuksel, M., Saglam, M., Arda, M., Yuksel,
U.,Saha, B. and Streat, M. (2003). Removal of Cadmium from Phosphoric
Acid Solution by Solvent-Impregnated Resins (Sirs)-Sorption Kinetics and
Equilibria Studies. J. Chem. Eng. Commun. 190 (5-8): 936–947.
Bart, H.J. and Schoneberger, A. (2000). Reactive Processes for Recovery of Heavy
Metals in Miniplants. J. Chem. Eng. Technol. 23(8): 653–660.
Othman, N., Mat, H. and Goto, M. (2006). Separation of Silver from Photographic
Waste by Emulsion Liquid Membrane System. J. Memb. Sci. 282: 171-177.
56
APPENDIX A
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Sample Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
XAD2-
Cyanex302 0.0258 7.82 3.42 104 48.550 53.731 0.450 0.498
(ethanol)
XAD2-
Cyanex302 0.0259 7.82 3.06 104 0.545 99.860 0.005 0.926
(kerosene)
XAD7-
Cyanex302 0.0257 7.82 3.17 104 0.283 100.892 0.003 0.935
(kerosene)
XAD7-
Cyanex302 0.0257 7.82 3.34 104 53.530 49.095 0.496 0.455
(ethanol)
57
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Sample Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
P1 0.0255 2.80 2.90 107.30 107.00 0.294 0.992 0.003
P2 0.0257 4.61 5.78 107.30 107.00 0.292 0.992 0.003
P3 0.0256 7.76 5.85 107.30 107.00 0.293 0.992 0.003
P4 0.0255 9.35 6.68 107.30 107.00 0.294 0.992 0.003
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Sample Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
P5 0.0257 2.80 2.87 107.30 107.00 0.292 0.992 0.003
P6 0.0258 4.61 5.00 107.30 102.10 5.039 0.947 0.047
P7 0.0258 7.76 5.82 107.30 94.03 12.859 0.872 0.119
P8 0.0258 9.35 3.18 107.30 79.22 27.209 0.734 0.252
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Sample Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
E1 0.0256 2.80 2.49 107.30 5.46 99.458 0.051 0.922
E2 0.0258 4.61 2.76 107.30 1.01 102.999 0.009 0.955
E3 0.0259 7.76 2.90 107.30 10.93 93.021 0.101 0.862
E4 0.0259 9.35 2.82 107.30 2.18 101.468 0.020 0.941
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Sample Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
E5 0.0257 2.80 2.44 107.30 0.76 103.635 0.007 0.961
E6 0.0258 4.61 2.76 107.30 0.47 103.515 0.004 0.960
E7 0.0257 7.76 2.77 107.30 0.46 103.926 0.004 0.963
E8 0.0259 9.35 2.74 107.30 0.36 103.227 0.003 0.957
58
Table A3: Data of kinetic adsorption of silver (Experimental conditions: EIR XAD7-
Cyanex302(kerosene)= 0.2g , Volume silver solution(sample) = 200ml, agitation
speed= 250rpm)
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Time Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
0.02 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 806.00 0.000 7.472 0.000
0.08 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 798.60 7.349 7.403 0.068
0.17 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 806.00 0.000 7.472 0.000
1.00 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 806.00 0.000 7.472 0.000
6.00 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 751.40 54.220 6.966 0.503
34.00 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 620.00 184.707 5.748 1.712
54.00 0.2014 7.94 - 806.00 619.50 185.204 5.743 1.717
73.00 0.2014 7.94 2.55 806.00 619.20 185.501 5.740 1.720
Table A4: Data of metals adsorption for real photographic waste (Experimental
conditions: EIR XAD7-Cyanex302(kerosene)= 0.0255g , Volume photographic
waste = 25ml, agitation speed= 250rpm)
Ci Cf Q Ce Qe
Metal Amount(g) pH i pH f
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/g) (mmol/l) (mmol/g)
Ag 0.0258 8.01 8.33 833 654.20 173.450 6.065 1.608
K 0.0258 8.01 8.33 3172 3172.00 0.000 29.406 0.000
Na 0.0258 8.01 8.33 1771 1771.00 0.000 16.418 0.000
Fe 0.0258 8.01 8.33 1026 961.30 62.694 8.912 0.581