No.

__10A442____________

_____________________

IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

________________________

___Cirino Gonzalez — PETITIONER

(Your Name)

vs.
_UNITED STATES OF AMERICA__— RESPONDENT(S)

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

____UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT (08-2300)______

(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE)

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

____Cirino Gonzalez ________________________

(Your Name)

_C/O Jose M. Gonzalez _____ ______

_POB 4183___________________ _____
(Address)

_Alice, Texas, 78333-4183_____ _______

(City, State, Zip Code)

_361 664 4260_______

(Phone Number)
 QUESTION(S) PRESENTED

1. What does the SUPREME COURT intend to do to insure that Cirino Gonzalez is afforded
adequate time to present his case in the presence of obstacles, as employees of the BUREAU of
PRISONS (BOP) and the OFFICE OF THE CLERK; SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES, delay and prevent his mail and legal correspondence to and from the Court, including
that to/from the FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES?

2. How does THE SUPREME COURT expect Cirino Gonzalez to properly submit filings under
the established rules of THE SUPREME COURT, as Cirino Gonzalez is unschooled in law, and
the rules of THE SUPREME COURT are quite complicated and difficult to understand without
an attorney, the cost of which is beyond the ability for Cirino Gonzalez and his family to pay?

3. What will THE SUPREME COURT do about the threats to Cirino Gonzalez's counsel, J.L.
Gordon, made by members of the FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, causing J.L.
Gordon to refuse to represent Cirino Gonzalez for fear of losing his license to practice.?

4. Will THE SUPREME COURT honor their 1943 decision in ADAMS V. UNITED STATES,
319 U. S. 312 (1943) and dismiss all charges against Cirino Gonzalez brought forth by a
criminally non-compliant UNITED STATES Court House in New Hampshire?
 NOTICE OF OBSTRUCTION

No.10A442

IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Cirino Gonzalez — PETITIONER

vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — RESPONDENT(S)

COMES NOW Cirino Gonzalez, a Real Party in Interest, who is neutral in the public, making a special
visitation by absolute ministerial right to THE SUPREME COURT, “restricted appearance” who is
unschooled in law and notices THE COURT of enunciation of principles as stated in Haines v. Kerner,
404 U.S. 519, wherein THE COURT has directed that those who are unschooled in law making
pleadings and/or complaints shall have THE COURT look to the substance of the pleadings rather than
in the form, and hereby makes the following pleadings/notices in the above referenced matter without
waiver of any defenses

NOTICE OF OBSTRUCTION

Cirino Gonzalez hereby NOTICES THE COURT, and has evidence, that known and/or uknown
members of the BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) have intentionally disrupted the flow of information to
and from Cirino Gonzalez that require, by law and BOP policy, to be delivered immediately and
opened only in the presence of Cirino Gonzalez. Much of this information was/is dated material
requiring a response from Cirino Gonzalez within a limited amount of time.

Further, Cirino Gonzalez hereby NOTICES THE COURT of the additional delay in correspondence by
the OFFICE OF THE CLERK; SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, has delayed the
mailing of the correspondence TO Cirino Gonzalez regarding filings of Petition for Writ of Certiorari,
MOTION REQUESTING in forma pauperis, as well as an Amicus Brief filed by Jose M. Gonzalez.
Said filings were held without having been recorded by the OFFICE OF THE CLERK for several days
before having been mailed TO Cirino Gonzalez, by the OFFICE OF THE CLERK for THE SUPREME
COURT, at the BOP location in Pheonix Arizona, which, as mentioned above delays, rejects, and
disrupts correspondence to and from Cirino Gonzalez.

Submitted for Cirino Gonzalez by Jose M. Gonzalez©, as of POWER OF ATTORNEY (see attached).

_________________________________
Jose M. Gonzalez©

State of Texas
County of Jim Wells
This document was acknowledged before me on _____________ (date)
By ___Jose Manuel Gonzalez©___ (name of principle)

______________________________
(signature of notarial officer) Seal/Stamp: