Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stokers, in combination with grate burners, The thorough mixing of the air and fuel
can be classified into four main types based on yields high net efficiencies and low excess
the method of introducing fuel to the furnace: combustion air. Efficiencies as high as 80
percent are typical. Another advantage of WOOD RESIDUE USE
these systems is their responsiveness to load
changes, made possible by the fast heat release The data collected in the 1997 survey
rate of the fuel and air mixture. indicates that the largest volume of wood
residue burned is bark which has overtaken
Suspension burners suffer the same sawdust as the major source of wood energy
problems as the overhead feed pile burners. for wood-fired boilers/furnaces in the state.
Entrainment of particulates in flue gases makes The amount of bark burned in 1997 was over
control of fly ash difficult; and, at high ten times the amount of bark burned in 1992.
combustion rates, the residence time of the fuel
may be insufficient for complete combustion The quantity of sawdust increased as well;
(Bulpitt 1984). but not to the same degree as bark. Total
sawdust reported burned in 1997 was nearly
Fluidized bed burner: A fluidized bed burner, 1800 tons per week which was 80 percent
named for the appearance of the bed during higher than the 998 tons per week of sawdust
normal operation which resembles vigorously reported burned in 1992. Total amounts of
boiling water, will burn the wettest and dirtiest residue generated, burned, and sold for those
of fuels. The bed is comprised of the biomass companies reporting in the 1997 survey are
fuel and a non-combustible or inert material substantially higher than the amounts reported
such as silica or limestone sand. The hot sand in the 1992 survey.
scrubs past particles of biomass and vice versa,
heating the biomass and creating a great deal of Some of the differences can be explained
turbulence. by the larger number of companies
participating in the 1997 survey; but, the most
To force the bed into a fluidized motion, significant reason for the higher amounts
combustion air is admitted to the furnace under reported in 1997 is explained by the type of
pressure, which must be greater than the wood products produced at the plants not
pressure required to levitate the whole bed. If surveyed in 1992. Three of the five
combustion temperatures are held relatively companies added to the survey in 1997 are
low, nitrogen oxides are prevented from very large engineered wood products
forming. However, exhaust gases contain manufacturers who were not yet in full
more particulate material, and well-designed operation in 1992. Their operations
air quality control equipment is required significantly increased the amount of wood
(Bulpitt 1984, Vasenda and Hassler 1993). residue generated and also had a major impact
on the type and amount of wood residue
Table 2 shows the methods of combustion burned.
utilized in wood-fired boilers in 1997.
Table 3 shows the changes in wood-fired
Table 2. boiler use of wood residue in the state of West
Boiler combustion methods by type 1992 and 19 97 Virginia from 1992 to 1997 (Anderson,
Hassler, and Hutchinson. 1998).
1992 1997
Grate burner 16 24
Dutch oven 6 6
Suspension burner 4 5
grate/suspension burner 7 4
Table 3. Total amount of residue generated, burned and sold in 1992 & 1997 Surveys
Sawdust 1479 3492 136% 998 1792 80% 531 1700 220%
Bark 969 5892 508% 294 3260 1010% 775 2632 240%
Slabs, Edgings, Fines 230 1619 604% 221 1587 620% 7.5 32 327%
& Others
Total 4089 13093 320% 1545 6801 440% 2724.5 6292 231%
* Percent change (%): [(1997 residue amount -1992 residue amount)/1992 residue amount]
(Anderson, Hassler, and Hutchinson 1998)
Anderson, B., C.C. Hassler, and V.R. Guinn, G.R. and N. Turner. Mar. 31, 1990.
Hutchinson. 1998. Wood-fired boiler use in Design Manual for Small Steam Turbines.
West Virginia - 1992 to 1997. West Virginia Prepared under contract No. TV-76680 for the
University, Appalachian Hardwood Center, U.S. Dept. Of Energy, Regional Biomass
Morgantown, WV. Energy Program, pp. 94-99.
Aton, C.L., L.P.Fisher, J.C. Wyvill and J.L. GTS Energy, Inc., http://www.gtsenergy.com.
Birchfield. 1979. Wood energy potential in Energy systems for Board Plants. Marietta,
West Virginia. Prepared by the Technology Georgia.
Applications Laboratory, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Project A-2297. Progressive Architect/Engineers/Planners,
Inc., June, 1986. Handbook for Conversion to
Bulpitt, W.S., Project Director. 1984. The Wood Energy Systems. Great Lakes Regional
Industrial Wood Energy Handbook. Prepared Biomass Energy Program,
by Technology Applications Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.
Georgia Institute of Technology. Van
Nostrand Reinhold Company, 240 pp. Pulaski, E.C., M.K. Karmous, L.G. Jahn , and
P.B. Wainwright. 1981. Wood Energy
Dukelow, S.G. 1981. Improving boiler Information Guide. Industrial Extension
efficiency. Cooperative Extension Services, Service, School of Engineering, North
Kansas State University under contract to Carolina State University, Raleigh, North
Kansas Energy Office, 3-81-12M, 144 pp. Carolina.
Elliott, Thomas C. 1989. Standard Handbook Vasenda, S. and C.C. Hassler. 1993. Wood-
of Powerplant Engineering. McGraw-Hill fired boiler survey, wood fuel promotion, and
Pub. Co., Bloomfield, Roger B. Chapter 3.5, small cogeneration system pilot project. West
Wood fuel and wood handling. Virginia University, Appalachian Hardwood
Center, Morgantown, WV. 31 pp.
Mr. Victor R. Hutchinson, Extension Specialist - Wood Energy
Dr. Bruce R. Anderson, Assistant Professor - Wood Science
Dr. Curt C. Hassler, Leader
Programs and activities offered by the West Virginia University Extension Service are available to all persons
without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin.
This project was supported by the Southeastern Regional Biomass Energy Program which is administered by the
Tennessee Valley Authority
for the United States Department of Energy.
This development of a Biomass Energy Program was prepared as a cooperative effort with the Energy Efficiency
Program Office, West Virginia Development Office.