Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract— Relaying has recently emerged as a field of growing is taken in [5], where an additional air interface is used for
interest for wireless systems. The use of intermediate nodes for the relaying operation, thus inherently enhancing the overall
relaying information from a source to its destination promises bandwidth used.
improvements on various levels, ranging from increased connec-
tivity and reduced transmit powers to diversity gains. We examine For 3G CDMA networks, the idea of Opportunity Driven
various propagation models and network parameters and show Multiple Access (ODMA) to enhance TDD system capac-
to which extent the pathloss in cellular wireless systems can be ity and coverage was investigated [6]. Zadeh and Jabbari
reduced by the use of relay nodes in a two-hop scenario. Having considered a FDD system in which digital repeaters relay
highlighted these potentials, we discuss by means of numerical
data packets in a time-division manner, suggesting that power
analysis and system-level simulation under which conditions these
savings can be turned into a transmit power reduction for CDMA savings are feasible [7].
FDD systems. It becomes evident that the overall performance In this paper, we further discuss the possibility of relaying in
of the relay system depends on the node density and the relative CDMA systems. To this end, we enhance the work presented
load. in [8]. Following a presentation of our CDMA FDD system
I. I NTRODUCTION model in section II, we demonstrate the achievable pathloss
savings that provide the potential for a reduction of transmit
Compared to conventional wireless cellular systems, in power savings in Section III. Section IV first analytically
which all terminals are directly connected to the backbone analyzes the achievable transmit power reduction, showing
infrastructure via a single hop, the use of intermediate nodes that transmit power savings and interference levels depend on
to help transmit information from one node to another facili- system load. Using different carriers for the relay reception and
tates numerous improvements. For example, the connectivity transmission, respectively, we then investigate more complex
of nodes can be improved, a network-level advantage often scenarios by means of system-level simulation. The paper
referred to as enhancing coverage in cellular systems. With concludes in section V.
respect to the physical layer, the inherent diversity of the
relaying channel enables to benefit from these diversity gains II. S YSTEM M ODEL AND A SSUMPTIONS
[1].
Moreover, relaying splits longer paths into shorter segments, We investigate a cellular CDMA system, in which all users
thus reducing the resulting total pathloss by exploiting the non- simultaneously share the same radio resource. Uplink (UL) and
linear relation of pathloss vs. distance. At system level (MAC), downlink (DL) are separated from each other in the frequency
this potentially allows for a reduction of transmit powers, and, domain. Our system assumptions are as follows.
consequently, lower electromagnetic immission. It is this very a) Node types: Four types of nodes are present: base
topic – decreasing the exposure to electromagnetic radiation – stations (BS), relay stations (RS, these are user terminals that
that increasingly becomes relevant for system design, partially serve other nodes while simultaneously performing their own
for reasons of interference reduction, partially due to pressure communication with the BS), target stations (TS, served by
from public opinion. the RS), and direct stations (DS, conventionally connected to
The idea of relaying in wireless networks has long been the BS); see Fig. 1.
attracting attention [2], yet it was only until recently that b) Parameters: The total number of mobile nodes is K.
relaying is considered for practical systems. The probability of a mobile station having relay capability is
Various works addressed a variety of different relaying ap- p(R), so that in average there are p(R) · K relays to serve
proaches for existing systems. For example, a detailed concept the potential TSs. Note that p(R) = 0 corresponds to the
for incorporating relay functionality into contemporary GSM conventional case in which all mobiles directly communicate
networks is presented in [3]; another contribution for relaying with the BS, while for p(R) = 1 all mobiles can potentially act
in F/TDMA networks is provided in [4]. A different approach as relays for other terminals. The number of hops towards a BS
is limited to two (”single-relay”, or ”two-hop” operation). At
This work has been supported by the German Federal Ministry for Educa-
tion and Research under grant 01 BU 053. The authors take on responsibility most Mmax target stations can be served by a RS. Various
for the contents. propagation models are examined, each superpositioned by
BS 1
DS Pathloss model
[dBm]
the pathlosses between the links, and then iteratively assigns Powers
frequencies subject to the above mentioned conditions. A 10 pathloss− load−
UL
detailed description of this procedure is beyond the scope of 5 determined determined
TABLE II
Fig. 5. Simulation results. Transmit powers of the conventional system and
S IMULATION PARAMETERS . the relay system vs. the data rate per mobile. As the data rate per mobile
increases, the load-determined power fraction becomes dominant over the
pathloss-determined fraction, and the rate increase then causes the relaying
Parameter Value system to exhibit stronger transmit powers than the conventional one.
Cell radius (hexagon) 800 m
Log-normal shadowing (σ) 8.0 dB
Target SINR Eb /N0 (γ0 ) var.
Noise power (N ) -106.7 dBm
node density. Even for optimistic assumptions (ideal node
Receiver noise figures {BS,DS,RS,TS} {5.0,8.0,5.0,8.0} dB placement in a star-scenario, relays have the capability of
Max. tx powers {BS,DS,RS,TS} {43,24,35,24} dBm transmitting and receiving simultaneously at the same fre-
Maximum DCH powers {DL,UL} {38,24} dBm quency), it was demonstrated that for high system loads the
DL orthogonality factor 0.4 transmit powers of the relay system exceed those of the direct
BS antenna height 30 m
BS antenna pattern Realistic sector
system.
DS, RS, TS antenna gain 18 dBi For interference-limited power-controlled systems this sug-
DS, RS, TS antenna (gain) Omni (0 dBi) gests that direct transmission eventually becomes favorable
Pilot & common power fraction 10% with respect to capacity considerations.
R EFERENCES
A simulation consists of numerous snapshots, the results of [1] Jon Boyer, David D. Falconer, and Halim Yanikomeroglu, “A Compari-
which are averaged to obtain reliable statistics. Each snapshot son of Relaying Models for Multihop Channels,” Mar. 2002, Submitted
represents a single realization of a random distribution of users to IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm.
[2] T.M. Cover and A.A. El Gamal, “Capacity Theorems for the Relay
and log-normal shadowing. At the beginning of a snapshot, the Channel,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 572–584,
specified number of mobiles are uniformly distributed over Sept. 1979.
the area. The subsequent routing procedure then establishes [3] George Neonakis Aggélou and Rahim Tafazolli, “On the Relaying
Capability of Next-Generation GSM Cellular Networks,” IEEE Pers.
the connection between the nodes, and finally frequencies are Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40–47, Feb. 2001.
assigned. [4] V. Sreng, H. Yanikomeroglu, and D. Falconer, “Coverage Enhancement
through Two-Hop Relaying in Cellular Radio Systems,” in Proc. IEEE
D. Simulation Results Wireless Commun. and Netw. Conf. (WCNC) 2002, Mar. 2002, vol. 2,
pp. 881–885.
Fig. 5 compares the transmit powers achieved in the direct [5] Hongyi Wu, Chunming Qiao, Swades De, and Ozan Tonguz, “Integrated
case and in the relaying case as a function of the data rate per Cellular and Ad Hoc Relaying Systems: iCAR,” IEEE J. Select. Areas
mobile station. Clearly, with increasing rate per mobile, i.e. Commun., vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2105–2215, Oct. 2001.
[6] T. Rouse, S. McLaughlin, and H. Haas, “Coverage–Capacity of
with higher network loads, relaying becomes less attractive Opportunity Driven Multiple Access (ODMA) in UTRA TDD,” in 3G
as predicted by analysis. In this example, relaying does not 2001 Mobile Communications Technologies, IEE Conf. Publication 477,
provide any power savings for rates greater than eighty kbit/s Mar. 2001, pp. 252–256.
[7] Ali N. Zadeh and Bijan Jabbari, “A High Capacity Multihop Packet
per mobile. While a complete discussion of the simulation CDMA Wireless Network,” in First ACM Workshop on Wireless Mobile
results is beyond the scope of this paper, it can be summarized Internet 2001, 2001.
that power savings ranging from 1 to 8 dB are feasible for low [8] M. Bronzel, W. Rave, P. Herhold, and G. Fettweis, “Interference
Reduction in Single-Hop Relay Networks,” in Proc. 11th Virginia
to medium network loads. Tech/MPRG Symposium on Wireless Personal Communications, June
2001, pp. 49–60.
V. S UMMARY AND C ONCLUSIONS [9] K.S. Gilhousen, I.M. Jacobs, R. Padovani, A.J. Viterbi, and L.A. Weaver,
“On the Capacity of a Cellular CDMA System,” IEEE Trans. Vehic.
We quantified the significant pathloss reductions that are Techn., vol. 40, pp. 303–312, May 1991.
achievable by relaying in wireless networks. However, due to [10] G.J. Foschini and Z. Miljanic, “A Simple Distributed Autonomous
the load increase caused by repeated emissions of essentially Power Control Algorithm and its Convergence,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 42, pp. 641–646, Nov. 1993.
the same signal, it was shown that the extent to which transmit
powers can be reduced strongly depends on network load and