You are on page 1of 3

Assurance & Advisory

www.SingerLewak.com | 877.754.4557

Public Company Financial Executive Brief


Analysis: New Guidance on Pro Forma requirements
for Business Combinations
By Jim Pitrat, CPA, Practice Leader - Assurance & Advisory Practice TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2011

Executive Summary: The new ASU clarifies that pro forma information of the
combined entity should be presented as though the business
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-29 clarifies that combination had occurred only as of the beginning of the
pro forma revenue and earnings for a business combination comparable year;
occurring in the current year should be presented as though
the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the Additionally, the ASU requires certain additive supplemental
year or, if comparative statements are presented, as though pro forma information concerning non-recurring pro forma
the business combination took place as of the beginning of adjustments.
the comparative year.
Amendments:
Prior to the ASU, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Section 805-10-50 , Business Combinations—Overall— The disclosures required of public entities are as follows:
Disclosure, calls for public entities to present pro forma
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as follows: If comparative financial statements are not presented, pro
forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity should be
• As if the date of acquisition was as of the beginning of based on the assumption that the business combination took
the current year, and, place as of the beginning of the current year.

• If comparative statements are presented, pro forma • If comparative financial statements are presented:
amounts are required to be reported as if the acquisition
date of a business combination occurring during the • Pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined
current period had taken place as of the beginning of the entity should be based on the assumption that the
comparative prior year. business combination occurred as of the beginning of
the comparative year, and
Interpretation of the requirements was varied. Companies
would interpret the guidance in the following ways: • In the year following the business combination,
pro forma information should not be revised if
• When a business combination occurs during the current comparative statements for the year in which the
period, pro forma revenue and earnings information acquisition occurred are.
should be presented as though the acquisition took place
as of the beginning of the current year and as of the • Disclosure of the nature and amounts of any material
beginning of the prior comparative year, or nonrecurring adjustments directly attributable to the
business combination included in the pro forma revenue
• Pro forma information was disclosed as if the business and earnings.
combination took place at the start of the prior
comparative year, with related acquisition adjustments Rules related to acquisitions by a not-for-profit entity, have
carried through in the current year. also been amended to require disclosure of the nature and
amounts of any material nonrecurring adjustments directly The new and amended disclosures should be applied
attributable to a business combination included in reported prospectively to business combinations consummated on or
pro forma revenue, changes in unrestricted net assets, after the start of the first annual reporting period beginning
changes in temporarily restricted net assets, and changes on or after December 15, 2010, with earlier application
in permanently restricted net assets. permitted.

For FurtHer inFormAtion, PLeAse contAct one oF tHe FoLLowinG:

Jim Pitrat: Harmeet singh: Gale moore:


JPitrat@singerlewak.com HSingh@singerlewak.com GMoore@singerlewak.com
310.477.3924 408.294.3924 949.261.8600
Practice Leader Business Combinations Subject Matter Expert Business Combinations Subject Matter Expert
Assurance & Advisory Los Angeles, SiliconValley Orange County, San Diego

You might also like