Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Implementing Agency:
Lead Agency: UPLB
Cooperating Agency: PCARRD
Project Sites: Regions I, IV, VII, X
Funding Agency:
FAO and PCARRD
OBJECTIVES
General Objective:
Specific Objectives:
1) To characterize the organic farming practices
adopted by farmers;
2) To determine the farmers’ technical and business
skills, the capacity to adopt the organic farming
standards including labeling and certification;
3) To assess the farmers’ level of awareness on
consumers’ preferences, markets and other
marketing activities;
4) To identify the opportunities, risks and constraints
faced by farmers in converting to organic
agriculture;
OBJECTIVES
Specific Objectives:
5) To identify the perceived factors affecting the
adoption of organic farming practices;
6) To determine the direct and indirect costs and
benefits associated with the adoption of organic
farming; and
7) To recommend appropriate measures that will
improve organic farming enterprises and will
enhance the development of organic agriculture
industry in the Philippines.
Significance of the Study
A. Full adopters
Reduction in cost
Higher yield attained
Improved soil fertility
B. In transition
Reduction in cost
Increase in yield
Improvement in soil fertility
Health benefits
environmental impact of using organic inputs
Indirect benefits
Impact on the environment
there had been a change in the quality of their
soils. The amount of heat emitted by the soil
was also noticeably noted by these farmers as
they reported that they feel the coolness of the
earth with the continuous addition and use of
organic fertilizer.
Health benefits
REGION
INDICATOR/STAGE ALL
I IV VII X
NFI
Full organic H M M H L
In transition M H L L H
Conventional L L H M
Total Returns
Full organic H L H L L
In transition M H L M
Conventional L M M H H
Total Costs
Full organic H L M L L
In transition L H H M
Conventional M M L H H
Use of organic
Full organic H M L H M
In transition M H H H
Conventional L L M L L
Use of inorganic
Full organic M L H L M
In transition L M M L
Conventional H H L H H
Economic benefit
1) Conventional farmers had the highest total
farm revenues but also incurred the highest
farm cost.
2) full-organic farmers incurred the lowest
NFI, lowest revenues, as well as lowest farm
cost.
3) transitional farmers incurred relatively
lower revenues than conventional farmers, as
well as in costs, resulting to having the
highest NFI
Opportunities
There are GOs and NGOs supporting organic
agriculture.
There are already companies producing organic fertilizer
and thus these are readily available in the market.
Moreover, with the support of GOs and NGOs, the
technology of producing organic fertilizers and pesticides
has already been developed and farmers can readily
prepare their own inputs in their own backyards without
necessarily buying them from the market. A lot of the
material inputs are also readily available in their area.
There is already awareness about organic agriculture
The increasing awareness about product safety for
certain sectors in the society
Strengths
First, small backyard production is traditionally organic.
Second, there are NGOs and GOs supporting organic
agriculture. The success of organic agriculture is largely
dependent in the LGU's support as revealed in this
study. Even the academe like UPLB, Xavier University,
DMMSU and research institutions like PCARRD and
SEARSOLIN are into the advocacy of organic agriculture
too.
Third, the technology of producing organic fertilizers and
pesticides have already been developed and farmers
can readily prepare their own inputs in their own
backyards without necessarily buying them from the
market.
Fourth, there is already an awareness about organic
agriculture.
Constraints
The farmers’ lack of entrepreneurial skills.
organic farmers very seldom keep records and
make farm plans.
less interested in updating their knowledge and
skills on the latest trends in organic farming.
Farmers seldom take the initiative in finding
markets for their produce.
Weak in finding new ways of packaging their
produce, advertising, scheduling of placement of
order, delivery and planning of procurement
Not risk takers
ALL REGIONS
ENTREPRENEURIAL QUALITY Full Transition Conventional Total
n= 35 25 60 120
6. Lack of capital
Small scale farmers are faced with lack of capital
to carry on the day to day requirement of organic
farming especially payment for hired labor during
land preparation.
7. Migration of household members to towns and
cities in search of full-time/part-time jobs has a
negative impact on conversion to organics since it
requires high amount of labor.
Recommendations
Capacity building
Information dissemination
market potentials, technologies, production
systems, and certification
Market development
identifying markets, packaging and giving brand
names to organic produce, pricing, and
distribution strategies
Processing and value adding
Provision of credit
Academe/NGO/LGU linkage
Conclusion
Organic agriculture offers a long term solution to make
small sized farms productive and sustainable.
Small-scale farmers seem most successful when given
adequate training and assured of important requirements
such as land, seeds, and other inputs.
This is especially true for farmer scientists who have
access to adequate resources, technological know-how
and exposure to organic agriculture.
They have developed the skills in farming and learned to
innovate given the knowledge they have acquired.
Among the more committed small scale farmers,
adherence to organic farming has become a way of life
LGUs, extension agents and the university are potent
forces in disseminating organic agriculture.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH