Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The size of solid particle which can be fluidized varies greatly from less
than
1µ m to 6cm. It is generally concluded that particles distributed in sizes between
150µ m
and 10µ m are the best for smooth fluidization (least formation of large bubbles).
Large
particles cause instability and result in slugging or massive surges. Small particles
(less
than 20µ m) frequently even though dry, act as if damp, forming agglomerates or
fissures
in the bed, or spouting. Adding finer sized particles to a coarse bed or coarse sized
particles to a bed of fines usually results in better fluidization.
The upward velocity of the gas is usually between 0.15m/s and 6m/s. This
velocity is based upon the flow through the empty vessel as is referred to as the
superficial velocity. As the velocity of flow increases, the particles rearrange
themselves
to offer less resistance to the fluid flow and the bed will tend to expand unless it is
composed of large particles (mean diameter > 1mm). The expansion continues
until a
stage is reached where the drag force exerted on the particles will be sufficient to
support
the weight of the particles in the bed. The fluid/particle systems then begin to
exhibit
fluid like properties and it will flow under the influence of a hydrostatic head. This
is the
point of incipient fluidization and the gas velocity needed to achieve this is referred
to as
the minimum fluidization velocity, Umf.
Beyond this velocity, the pressure drop across the bed will be
approximately
equal to the weight of the bed per unit area. The effective∆ P excludes the
hydrostatic
pressure drop across the bed which can be neglected in gas fluidized systems
operating at
atmospheric pressure. It is likely, however that this pressure drop will be exceeded
just
prior to fluidization with gas fluidized systems in order to overcome cohesive
forces
between the particles and break down the residual packing and interlocking of
particles
within the bed.
The behavior of fluidization is depends on the types of the particles
composed in
the vessel. Geldart (1973) classified powders into four groups according to their
fluidization properties at ambient condition. There are 4 stages of particles that are
(A)
aerated, (B) bubble, (C) cohesive and (D) dense. In this experiment, we are
considering
with a coarse sand which is in group B, Ballotini which is in group A and
Glutinous flour
which is in group C.
From this experiment, we can obtain the bed expansion, bed pressure drop
and the
flow rate of the fluid. By the equation given in the theory, superficial gas velocity,
Umf
andεmf for all cases can be calculated. Then only, we plotted two graphs which are
bed
pressure drop against superficial gas velocity and bed expansion against superficial
gas
velocity for all cases. The Umf predicted from the graph then is being compared
with the
calculated one.
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
There are three objectives of doing the fluidization experiment:
∗ To determine the pressure drop and bed expansion through a fixed and
fluidized bed.
∗ To verify the Ergun equation (1952), Wen & Yu equation (1966) and
Baeyens & Geldart equation (1977).
∗ To observe the onset of fluidization
OBJECTIVES
There are three objectives of doing the fluidization experiment:
∗ To determine the pressure drop and bed expansion through a fixed and
fluidized bed.
∗ To verify the Ergun equation (1952), Wen & Yu equation (1966) and
Baeyens & Geldart equation (1977).
∗ To observe the onset of fluidization
THEORY
(
)
(
)
3
2
3
2
1
75
.
1
1
150
ε
ε
ρ
ε
ε
µ
p
g
p
dU
dU
H
P
−
+
−
=
∆
−
Where:
=
p
d
Size of particles
(µ m)
=
H
Height of bed
(m)
=
µ
Viscosity of air
(N/m2s)
=
U
Average superficial velocity (m/s)
=
ε
Bed voidage
(-)
=
g
ρ
Density of air
(kg/m3)
=
∆PPressure drop across the bed (N/m2)
Re = average Reynold’s number based on superficial velocity which is
dimensionless
Re =(
)
ε
µρ
−
1
p
gUd
and if Re < 10 than laminar flow
A
Q
U =
Where A = Bed cross sectional area
Theoretically, at incipient fluidization;
AM
P
1
.
0
=
∆
WhereP
∆is in cm water gauge.
Pressure drop,∆ P
Superficial gas velocity, U
∴Re =(
)
ε
µρ
−
1
p
gUd
and if Re < 10 than laminar flow
Re > 2000 turbulent flow
If the flow rate Q is measured in liters/s and U is the average superficial velocity
in m/s, then:
A
Q
U =
Where A = Bed cross sectional area
Theoretically, at incipient fluidization;
AM
P
1
.
0
=
∆
WhereP
∆is in cm water gauge.
Pressure drop,∆ P
Superficial gas velocity, U
Umf
The pressure drop at fluidization can also be predicted by using the equation:
(
)(
)g
H
P
g
g
ρ
ρ
ε
−
−
=
∆
1
Where
g
ρ
=
density of the particle
g
=
gravitational force
b) Minimum Fluidization velocity, Umf
For particles, dpi > 100µ m, Wen and Yu (1966) can be used to find Umf
Ar = 1060Remf +
687
.
1
159mf
Or
(
)
[
]
1
10
59
.
3
1
7
.
33
Re
5
.
0
5
−
+
=
−Ar
x
mf
For spheres ranging from 0.01 < Remf < 1000
5
AM
P
1
.
0
=
DISCUSSIONS
For the first types of particles which is coarse grade sand, the graph shows
a little increasement in the pressure drop when the superficial velocity gas also
increase. The fluidization starts when it reaches minimum fluidization velocity
which is about 0.0715m/s.
The second type is finer sand or ballotini, from the graph we can saw that
the pressure drop also increase as the superficial gas velocity increased. For this
case, the minimum fluidization velocity is 0.0682m/s. For this two types of
particles, bubbles continue to grow, never achieving a maximum size.
Lastly is the glutinous flour, fluidization did not occur in this case. The bed
not expanding and resist aeration. This is because the flour is cohesive and the
structure is so strong upon fluidization. Beside that, it also because the interaction
force between the particles is strong if compared to the hydronamic force by the
fluiding gas.
For Glutinous Flour, fluidization did not occur because group C particles
exhibit cohesive tendencies. The structures are so strong which upon fluidization,
cracks and rat hole is form and at a given pressure different, the bed not expanding
and resist aeration.1
Other than that, it is very difficult to fluidize because the inter particle forces is
higher
than hydrodynamic forces exerted on the particles by the fluidizing gas. However,
group
C fluidization can be improved by mechanical help such as include a vibrator or a
mixer.
Lastly, for bed voidage at minimum fluidization velocity, εmf for sand is 0.321387
while εmf for Ballotini is 0.383097. This shows that bed voidage for Ballotini is
higher and