Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDIA
T.V.Rao
Abstract:
Introduction:
The most recent crisis in the Banking History is the Sub-Prime fiasco which
resulted in the Global Financial Crisis and destabilised the economies of many
countries. The global economic outlook suddenly deteriorated and in fact the
Global GDP shrunk during years 2008-2009. United States, Europe and Japan
have gone into recession and the contagion effect has spread to most other
countries (Duvvuri Subba Rao, RBI Governor) . This is by far the worst crisis
since the 70’s. There were Banking Crisis since the 90’s for example the
Norwegian Banking Crisis in 1990-91,Japanese Banking Crisis during 1991-92,
Mexican Crisis in 1995, Asian Crises during 1997-98, the Russian , Argentinian,
and Turkish Banking Crisis in 2000. In comparison, the Indian Banking Sector
remained unscathed barring sporadic instances of Bank failures like the Global
Trust Bank, where too thanks to the urgent initiatives of the Reserve Bank and
the Finance Ministry there was no contagion effect and things have been
sorted out so eminently. The role of the Reserve Bank of India in setting
Governance and compliance standards in the Banking Sector is laudable. The
way in which Reserve Bank responded to the challenges of the recent Global
Financial Crisis, and its effect on India has demonstrated once again that the
Indian Banking system is robust and resilient.
The present study is undertaken to analyse the efficacy of the measures taken
by the Regulator of the Banking System in India i.e., the Reserve Bank of India
to regulate and supervise the Banking system, and whether these measures
have enabled the Banks to perform better and be placed on par with
International Standards in terms of the known solvency and profitability
parameters.
The regulatory and supervisory functions of the Banking system were not
defined properly till the establishment of the Reserve Bank of India which
created confusion. The presidency Banks were regulated and governed by
Royal Charter and the government of India. The Company legislation did not
cover the Banking Companies. This lack of proper regulatory and supervisory
framework lead to major Bank failures undermining the confidence of the
public. The first systematic study of the Banking regulation and supervision
was conducted by the Central Banking Enquiry Committee (1929-31).
This the Banking Supervision in India evolved over a period of time as the
Government has started realising that a well regulated Banking system is
necessary for safeguarding the interests of the Depositors and to ensure the
allocative efficiency of the financial system to fulfil the growth objectives.
During the pre reform period from 1970 to 1980 due to practices like the
administered rates of interest, govt. directed lending etc. RBI’s supervision was
not very effective. It is only in the post reform period, the RBI became very
innovative in evolving risk based methods and implemented them effectively.
The traditional methods of governance and supervision during the 80’s were
the system of Annual Appraisal of Banks which are purely based on-site
Inspections. During the 90’s the system of group-wide supervisory oversight
was adopted. The system of off-site monitoring of banks was introduced in
1995. Gradually the supervisory rating models like the CAMELS AND CALCS
were also developed by the Reserve Bank to provide a risk based summary
view of the overall health of individual Banks. Another important milestone in
the Risk Based approach to Banking supervision was the introduction of
Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Frame Work. The PCA framework enables
timely intervention of the Reserve Bank of India when the soundness
parameters like the Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality and the Return on Assets
deteriorate. The Board for financial Supervision was constituted under the
Chairmanship of the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India which played a very
important role in securing the orderly supervisory oversight of Banks.
The shift from transaction based supervision to Risk based Supervision was
necessitated due to the complexity of modern times. The most important of
the risks viz., Credit Risk, Market Risks(Interest Rate Risk, Foreign Exchange
Risk, Liquidity Risk), Operational risk(People Risk, Control Risk, IT Risk,
Legal/Regulatory Risk, Reputational Risk) need deft planning and careful
handling by the Banks. The Supervisory mechanism too needs to upgrade their
skills for prompt detection of the failure of the Risk Management systems.
Reserve Bank over a period of time has guided and insisted on the putting in
place proper Risk Management Systems in Banks.
It is to the credit of the Indian Regulatory Agencies like the Reserve Bank of
India, Securities Exchange Board of India, IRDA etc. that the Indian Financial
System remained comparatively unscathed despite the catastrophic failures of
the financial systems elsewhere in the world.
Conclusion:
It is felt that on occasions like this when we speak of Leadership through
Governance, while there will be many individual leaders, and institutions
emerging as leaders, the role of the Reserve Bank of India in the sphere of
Leadership and Governance should be definitely remembered. It is the culture
and the steadfastness with which the Reserve Bank ha assiduously pursued the
goals of attaining International Standards in Governance and Regulation of the
Banks that has secured for the Country a Sound and Resilient Banking system.
REFERENCES:
Taylor, John (2009), “The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An
Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong”, Working Paper 14631,
January, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Reserve Bank of India (2005b): (History of) Reserve Bank of India (3 volumes),
Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
Reports of the Narasimhan Committee on Banking Reforms I and II