Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Third
Edition
Cover PON_3: Cover Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 11:02 AM Page 4
This pocket guide provides an introduction to FTTH technology and testing during installation,
activation and troubleshooting of passive optical networks (PONs).
www.EXFO.com
Guide PON.3-ang: Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 10:59 AM Page 1
Table of Contents 4.2 Test Setup for ORL and Optical Loss Measurement Link ....25
1. Introduction to FTTx ................................................................................2 4.3 Test 1: ORL Testing ......................................................................................26
1.3 Types of PONs ......................................................................................................7 4.4 Test 2: Bidirectional Loss Testing ......................................................29
1. Introduction to FTTx
Guide PON.3-ang: Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 10:59 AM Page 3
1. Introduction to FTTx
1.1 Description
Singlemode optical fiber, with its almost unlimited bandwidth, is now the transport medium of choice in long-haul and
metropolitan networks. The use of fiber-optic cable rather than copper cable significantly reduces equipment and
maintenance costs, while dramatically increasing quality of service (QoS) and now more than ever, many corporate
clients have access to point-to-point (P2P) fiber-optic services.
Fiber-optic cables are now deployed in the last mile, the segment of the network that extends from the central office
(CO) to the subscriber. Since this segment has typically been copper-based, the high-speed services available to
residential clients and small businesses have been limited to generic digital subscriber lines (xDSL) and hybrid fiber
coaxial transmissions (HFC). The main alternative—wireless transmission with direct broadcast service (DBS)—requires
an antenna and a transceiver. Therefore, copper- and wireless-based transport presents the following shortcomings:
• Limited bandwidth in a context where there is an explosive growth in demand for more bandwidth and higher-speed
services over longer reaches
• Different media and equipment requiring extensive maintenance
Although fiber-optic cables overcome all of these limitations, one of the obstacles to providing fiber-optic services
directly to residences and small businesses has been the high cost of connecting each subscriber to the CO. A high
number of P2P connections would require numerous active components and a great deal of fiber-optic cables and
therefore, would have prohibitive installation and maintenance costs. An alternative presently being considered is
deployment of an entirely passive point-to-multipoint (P2MP) topology up to the building, while potentially keeping
copper and wireless premises networks or even providing the fiber up to the subscribers.
OLT Splitter
ONT
transform light through optical-electrical- WDM
Coupler
Variance of the architecture consists of connecting a number of F2s to a drop terminal and then to an F3 drop fiber to
the premises. Various shared bandwidths will be provided, depending on customer requirements. So far, typical
symmetric or asymmetric rates of 155 Mbit/s, 622 Mbit/s, 1.5 Gbit/s and 2.5 Gbit/s have been planned. The protocol
of choice is based on the asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) and is typically called Ethernet for EPON; ATM-PON for
BPON; ATM and GEM (TDM and Ethernet) for GPON upstream; ATM, GEM (TDM and Ethernet) and ATM/GEM for
GPON downstream.
There are many variations of the FTTx architecture
(see Figure 1-2), including:
FTTC WDM ONT
• Fiber-to-the-cabinet (FTTCab)
Coupler ONT
• Fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC)
• Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)
OLT
FTTH
• Fiber-to-the-node (FTTN)
ONT
ONT
• Fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP)
= Fiber
• Fiber-to-the-office (FTTO)
= Copper
• Fiber-to-the-user (FTTU)
Figure 1-2. Typical FTTx network
• Etc.
Type BPON (Broadband PON) GPON (Gigabit-Capable PON) EPON (Ethernet PON)
Wavelength band Upstream: 1260-1360 nm Downstream: 1480-1500 nm 1000BASE-PX10: downstream:
Upstream and/or downstream: Upstream: 1260-1360 nm 1490 nm + PIN Rx
Intermediate wavelength band: Possibility of using shorter Upstream: 1300 nm
1360-1480 nm (for future use) C-band wavelengths downstream (low-cost FP optics and PIN Rx)
1500 nm wavelength band¸ and 1550 nm upstream 1000BASE-PX20:
Basic band: 1480-1500 nm Downstream: 1490 nm + APD Rx
(Downstream) Enhancement band: Upstream: 1300 nm
(1) 1539-1565 nm (ADS) (DFB optics + PIN Rx)
(2) 1550-1560 (video distribution service)
Future L band: wavelengths not
yet defined (for future use)
Data rate(s) Symmetric: 155.52/622.08 Mbit/s Symmetric: 1244.16/2488.32 Mbit/s Symmetric: 1.25 (nominal 1) Gbit/s
Asymmetric: Asymmetric:
Downstream: 622.08 Mbit/s Downstream: 1244.16/2488.32 Mbit/s
Upstream: 155.52 Mbit/s Upstream: 155.2/622.08/1244.16 Mbit/s
Possible downstream extension
to 1244.16 Mbit/s
Table 1-1. Available PON architectures (continued) CO
Splitter 1 x N
1.4 Available Services
ONT
Figure 1-3 shows the wavelengths
and services used in an FTTx network. OLT WDM
Coupler
Optical ONT
Video EDFA
Transmitter 1490 nm Voice and data
1550 nm Overlaid analog RF video
(may not be provided)
1310 nm Voice and data
Figure 1-3. Wavelengths and services in an FTTx network
ONU1
ONU2
VDSL
FTTC
ONU3 VDSL
OLT OLT CO ONU
ONU4
FTTB
ONU5 ONT
ONU1 ONU5 Splitter
OLT
PON VDSL
ONU
ONU2 ONU4
FTTH
ONT
ONU2 ONU4
VDSL
FTTC
ONU3
OLT ONU
Splitter
Figure 2-4. PON topologies Figure 2-5. FTTH, FTTB and FTTC
In addition, as shown in Figure 2-4, other topologies such as the star, ring and bus topologies also exist; even protection
is anticipated with different strategies.
In some cases, it may not be necessary to bring the fiber directly to every subscriber. In this case, the fiber from the
splitter is brought to an ONT, and short copper-based links (typically VDSL, which provides sufficient bandwidth for
triple-play services over short distances) are used for the final connection (see Figure 2-5); this is also known as Fiber-
to-the-Building (FTTB). A single PON can use a combination of FTTH, FTTB and other types of connections.
WDM couplers are used to multiplex the downstream voice/data signal at 1490 nm with the downstream RF video
signal at 1550 nm and the upstream voice/data signal at 1310 nm.
CO FDH ONT
Drop Terminal
Splitter
1XN Distribution Fiber Drop
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
ONT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop Terminal
ONT
2.2.2 Splitters
Number of Ports Splitter Loss (dB)
The bidirectional optical branching device used in the P2MP PON is called an (excluding connectors
optical power splitter or simply a splitter, which has one input from the F1 port and excess
and multiple output ports. Splitters are passive because they require no external splitter loss)
energy source other than the incident light beam. They are broadband and only 2 3
add loss, mostly due to the fact that they divide the input (downstream) power.
4 6
This loss, called splitter loss or splitting ratio, is usually expressed in dB and
depends mainly on the number of output ports, as shown in Table 2-1. For 8 9
instance, the input (downstream) optical signal is divided equally in cascade or 16 12
branches; for instance a 1x2 splitter has only two branches or one split that 32 15
bares a 3 dB loss (50% light in each leg); in a 1x4 splitter another two branches
64 18
will be added to each leg of the original 1x2 split this time adding another 3 dB
for a total of 6 dB loss; in a 1x8 splitter two more branches or 1x2 split will be Table 2-1. Splitter loss
added to each leg of the original 1x4 split, again adding another 3 dB for a total
of 9 dB loss. A 1x16 splitter will then bare a 12 dB, and a 1x32 splitter will have a minimum of 15 dB loss, not counting any
additional loss due to connections and imperfections (typically 1dB is added to the original splitting loss) therefore, a 1x32
splitter will have a typical 16 dB loss.
PON uses an equal part among the output ports to F2, allowing multiple users to share a single optical fiber and consequently
a shared bandwidth. In the upstream direction, optical signals are combined from a number of ONTs into the single fiber F1.
It should be noted that, contrary to what one might expect, the splitter adds approximately the same loss even for light traveling
in the upstream direction.
There may be one splitter or several cascaded splitters in an FTTx network, depending on the network topology. ITU-T
Recommendations G.983 currently enables split ratios up to 32, while Recommendations G.984 extends the ratio up to 64.
Regardless of the topology, the splitter must accommodate the allowed optical-loss budget.
Splitters can be packaged in different shapes and sizes, depending on the basic technology used. The most common
types are the planar waveguide (typically for high split ratios) and the fused-biconic taper (FBT) fiber (typically for low
counts). Both types are manufactured for mounting in closure tray assemblies. Figures 2-8 and 2-9 illustrate the two
technologies.
3.1 Fiber
Fiber-optic cable installation is one of the most costly elements in PON deployment. Several methods are available, and
the choice of method depends on various factors, including cost, right-of-way, local codes, aesthetics, etc., and whether the
installation is being performed in a new premises development (Greenfield installation) or in an existing development over
existing routes (overlay/overbuild). Three basic cable-installation methods are available:
• The direct burial method places the cable underground in direct contact with the soil; this is done by trenching,
plowing or boring.
• A duct installation in which the optical cable is placed inside an underground duct network. Although the initial duct
installation is more expensive than a direct burial installation, the use of ducts makes it much easier to add or remove
cables.
• Aerial installations comprise the placement of the cable on poles or towers above the ground. This type of installation,
commonly used for overbuilding, is usually more affordable than underground installation and does not require heavy
machinery. The optical cable can be lashed to a supporting messenger cable or self-supporting optical cables can
be used.
For densely populated areas with particular right-of-way challenges, several alternative methods are available such as
installing the cable in grooves cut into the pavement or inside drainpipes, sewer pipes and natural gas pipelines. There
are three types of cables: feeder F1, distribution F2 and drop F3 (optional).
As singlemode fibers have very small cores, typically 9 micrometers in diameter, a single particle of dust or dirt can
obstruct the transmission area; therefore, when making connections, observe the following guidelines:
• Never allow unmated connectors to touch any surface and never touch a connector ferrule for any reason other than cleaning
• First inspect the connector end-face, then clean and inspect each connector again using a fiberscope or a videoscope
(which is safer and more accurate) prior to mating—even if there was only a temporary disconnection. Clean and
inspect test equipment connectors every time the instrument is used and use a fiberscope or videoscope after cleaning
• Use of an appropriate cleaning method with tape, cleaning kit, dry-air blower, surface-cleaning pad or optical-quality
fabric cleaner is recommended. Pure alcohol specially for cleaning fiber optics can also be used
• Keep unused connector ports capped and all unused caps in a small resealable plastic bag
Note that number of installations use APC connectors, especially when high-powered overload analog RF video is used,
and since they are angled, special care should be taken when inspecting, cleaning and connecting these connectors.
Never connect an APC connector to a PC or UPC connector.
WARNING!
Never look directly into a live fiber with the naked eye. Always use protective gear to inspect cable ends and
connectors or use videoscope.
Carefully follow all safety procedures listed in each of the test instrument’s user guide.
Never look directly into fibers, connectors or equipment apertures, unless you are absolutely sure that the
light source has been powered off.
When using a fiberscope, always be absolutely sure that the light source has been powered off. If possible,
use a videoscope to inspect fiber ends and connectors.
Do not power up any laser-transmitter equipment until you are certain that all work has been completed on the
transmission system and that all cabled fibers are properly cleaned and connected.
www.EXFO.com FTTx PON Guide EXFO 23
Guide PON.3-ang: Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 10:59 AM Page 24
4.2 Test Setup for ORL and Optical Loss Measurement Link
Since communication over the fiber is bidirectional, the ORL must be measured in
both directions. Using an ORL meter or compatible OLTS at each end of the link,
the ORL should be measured first in one direction, then in the opposite direction.
Modern OLTS units can now be used for measuring both ORL and optical loss at
the same time.
The optical-loss test requires a sequence of two measurements. Two OLTS units
are first referenced together using their individual light sources. Then, each OLTS
sends a calibrated power value from its light source over the section under test to
the other OLTS, which measures the received power and calculates the loss.
ITU-T recommendations G.983 and G.984 series allow a maximum ORL of 32 dB
for a link. IEEE 802.3ah allows a minimum of 20 dB and a maximum of 15 dB for
EPON. Note: Never connect an APC connector to a PC or UPC connector.
Table 4-1 shows a typical ORL value for different types of connectors.
Note: Be careful not to confuse the acronyms OLTS (optical loss test set) and
OLT (optical line terminal).
CO FDH
Drop
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber Drop
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop
Terminal
ONT
Figure 4-5. Testing the bidirectional ORL from the CO to the drop terminal
4.3.2 Procedure
The ORL meter should be calibrated and referenced. Refer to the user guide supplied with the instrument for complete
information.
Before connecting or splicing cables, measure the ORL for each splitter branch separately. Perform the ORL test in both
directions. Check for uniformity at the different splitter ports. Once all connections are made, measure end-to-end ORL.
Note: The higher the ORL reading, the better.
CO FDH
Drop
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber Drop
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop
Terminal
ONT
Figure 4-6. Testing the ORL from the CO to the drop terminal
Figure 4-7. Good ORL values Figure 4-8. Poor ORL values (based on a 32 dB
specificaion)
4.4 Test 2: Bidirectional Loss Testing
Optical loss is defined as the difference in power level between the transmitting source and the receiving power meter.
The total optical system/link loss is the sum of the insertion loss (IL) of the OLT connector, WDM coupler, splices, fiber
attenuation, splitter, ONT connector and any faulty connector matings. IL is the loss of optical energy resulting from the
insertion of a component or device in an optical path.
When the network is designed, a loss budget is established in accordance with standard values. This is a detailed
analysis to ensure that the receiver will receive the level of power required for error-free transmission. The loss budget
takes into account the transmitter power and the receiver sensitivity, as well as the expected loss of every optical
component in the network. The loss budget requirement for the PON, based on ITU-T is shown in Table 4-4:
Attenuation2 (dB)
ORL (dB) IEEE802.3ah
Class A Class B Class B+ Class C
1000BASE-PX
ITU-T Rec.
10 km 20 km
Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max.
Min. Max. Min. Max.
GPON >32 5 20 10 25 15 30 G.984.2
G.983.1
See Table 4-2
BPON 32 5 20 10 25 15 30 G.9821
G.983.3
D 5 19.5 10 23.5
EPON 20 15
U 20 20 24 24
BPON Down Up
Standards
Class B+ Min. Max. Min. Max.
The splitters in a PON cause an inherent loss because the input power is divided between several outputs. Splitter loss
depends on the split ratio and is approximately 3 dB for a 1:2 splitter, increasing by 3 dB each time the number of
outputs is doubled. A 1:32 splitter has a splitter loss of at least 15 dB. This loss is seen for both downstream and
upstream signals. Splices or connectors at the splitter ports create an additional loss.
An example of a PON loss budget is shown in Table 4-4. In this example, no loss from dispersion or any non-linear
effects are taken into account (only 1 dB loss would be expected for very high-bit-rate systems at 1550/1490 nm).
Based on the worst-case total loss of 25 dB (at 1310 nm), this system would meet a class B loss budget but with no
margin. The worst loss comes from the splitter (68%), and its loss would need to be improved, otherwise class C
transmission would be required to guarantee the loss margin.
The following considerations are important when selecting an OLTS for PON applications:
• Some OLTS models are automated—automated testing reduces testing time and risk of operator errors
• A high dynamic range allows for testing of very lossy components, such as the splitter and/or increasing the distance
coverage
• An integrated talk-set facilitates bidirectional communication between technicians performing end-to-end tests
• Dual- or triple-wavelength (1310/1490/1550 nm) testing capability is essential for testing PONs based on legacy
fibers showing larger attenuation compared to the more recent vintages. Testing at the three service wavelengths
ensures knowledge of loss budget for each service and is especially critical for meeting video quality requirements.
For further information on choosing and using an OLTS, refer to the following articles from our website
(www.EXFO.com):
• How to Choose an Optical Loss Test Set
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/anote021-ang.pdf
• Accurate Loss Testing Made Easy
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/pnote006-ang.pdf
• Loss Measurement in Fiber-Optic Networks
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/pnote007-ang.pdf
4.4.2 Procedure
To perform automatic loss testing using two OLTS units, four steps are
usually required (refer to the user guide supplied with the instrument for
detailed information):
• Offset nulling (if required by the instruments) compensates for detector
noise and internal offsets—some test units do not require this step
• Test setup (on both instruments) allows for the selection of the
wavelength(s) and other test parameters
• Referencing (on both instruments) is necessary to measure loss
through the fiber only, and not through the test jumpers and
accessories—some units automatically perform this step Figure 4-9. Good link loss results
Once both OLTS units have been referenced, the jumper on each
OLTS is disconnected from the detector port and connected to the
fiber under test (FUT). The test is initiated on one OLTS. The source
of this OLTS sends light through the link. The other OLTS measures
the received power values and communicates this information to the
initiating instrument, which compares the quantity of light received
with the reference measurement. The difference between the two
measurements corresponds to the average link loss.
Power (dB)
couplers and faults.
Loss
An OTDR operates by sending a high-power pulse of light down the
fiber and measuring the light reflected back. Every event in the link Slope shows
(i.e., each optical component and optical fault) causes a reflection or fiber attenuation
an optical loss, or both. Fiber ends and fiber breaks as well as
connectors and other components each reflect a small part of the
pulse back to the OTDR. The OTDR uses the time it takes individual Figure 4-12. Cable section mapping from splitter input to
reflections to return to determine the distance of each event. WDM coupler output
Optical fibers uniformly backscatter a small portion of the light over their entire
length. The OTDR measures this backscattered light to determine the
attenuation of the fiber. Sudden reductions in the level of backscattered light
correspond to optical losses due to splices or other events. For instance, the
typical attenuation of the G.652.C fibers can be measured over the ranges of
wavelengths used in the PON, typically:
• 0.33 dB/km at 1310 nm (0.35 dB/km for worst case)
• 0.21 dB/km at 1490 nm (0.27 dB/km for worst case)
• 0.19 dB/km at 1550 nm (0.25 dB/km for worst case)
Larger spectral attenuations may be observed in old G.652 fibers.
The faults that can be detected by the OTDR include misalignments and
mismatches, angular faults, dirt on connector ferrules, fiber breaks and Figure 4-13. EXFO’s FTB-7400E OTDR housed
macrobends. Macrobends are unwanted events that are caused when a fiber is in the FTB-200 Compact Platform
bent tighter than its minimum bend radius (such as tie-wrap too tight) and can
easily be detected by comparing the loss at 1310, 1490 and 1550 nm, due to the fact that macrobends have more
significant losses at higher wavelengths (1550 nm) than at lower ones (1310 nm). The best OTDR wavelength available
for macrobending detection is 1625 nm (the longer the wavelength, the better).
Each fiber should be tested from the OLT at the CO to the splitter, as well as from the splitter to the ONTs
(bidirectionally if possible). Several types of events, such as mismatched core sizes, generate different levels (gainers
vs. losses), depending on whether the light comes from one direction or the other. Bidirectional testing provides more
accurate results since the loss values measured in each direction can be averaged.
Another important consideration when using an OTDR is the dead-zone phenomenon. Due to the fact that the detector
in the OTDR is extremely sensitive, it may become saturated by strong reflections, such as from the OTDR output
connector and from the first event (connector) in the network. Often, the longest dead zone occurs at the first
connection (the OTDR bulkhead connector). Since it is impossible to measure loss within a dead zone, loss due to
splices and connectors close to the OTDR launch point can not be determined under ordinary circumstances. However,
the use of a pulse suppressor box (PSB) between the OTDR and the FUT can work around this problem. The PSB
contains a length of fiber-optic cable that allows the first connector, as well as events hidden by the dead zone, to be
included in the link loss measurement.
Loss from the last connector of the FUT can be measured in the same way, by connecting the PSB to the last
connector. The PSB enables the OTDR to compare backscattering levels before and after the event in order to calculate
the connector loss.
4.5.1 Required Equipment
For PON testing, the OTDR should be capable of testing at either
three wavelengths (1310, 1490 and 1550 nm). In many cases,
testing at 1550 nm is considered adequate to cover the 1490 nm
region at the same time. It is generally agreed that the fiber
attenuation at 1490 nm is approximately 0.02 dB greater than at
1550 nm, which for a maximum of 20 km adds 0.4 dB of total
attenuation. This is usually true for very recent vintage fiber (late
’90s and younger), especially for the G.652.C. However, this may be
questionable for older vintage fiber (early ’90s and older) when
G.652.C did not yet exist and when little interest was placed on the
water peak (E-band). Figure 4.14. FTTx PON OTDR trace
For testing long fibers or lossy components, high dynamic range is necessary, whereas when characterizing a discrete
event, a short pulse is often required. These two features contradict each other: a longer pulse will provide a higher
dynamic range, while a shorter pulse will come with a lower peak power, limiting the dynamic range.
The OTDR analysis software must be well-designed to thoroughly locate all possible types of events, such as reflections
caused by connectors, fiber breaks or fiber ends; as well as losses caused by splices or macrobends; in addition to gains
caused by imperfect core alignments or diameter differences (delta variations in mode-field diameter). A good-quality
OTDR should be able to clearly point out all types of events on the trace; to make them easily identifiable to the user
and to list the events in an event table.
It is important to select an option that provides a well-designed, easy-to-use interface and includes features such as
signal averaging, report generation and printing, as well as an automatic mode of operation. Some OTDRs also include
a built-in visual fault locator (VFL).
For further information on using an OTDR, refer to the following articles on our website (www.EXFO.com):
• Bidirectional OTDR Testing: Multimode vs. Singlemode Fibers
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/anote043-ang.pdf
• Optimizing OTDR Measurement Parameters
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/anote076-ang.pdf
• Fiber-Optic Testing Challenges in Point-to-Multipoint PON Testing
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/anote110-ang.pdf
• Pass/warning/fail criteria: Some OTDRs can display a message at the end of an analysis to inform the user if one
or more events exceed a preset threshold. Separate warning and fail thresholds can be set for each type of
measurement (i.e., splice loss, connector loss, reflectance, fiber section attenuation, total span loss, total span length,
and ORL). This feature can be used to ensure that each optical component in the link meets its acquired values.
4.5.3 Procedure
During installation, OTDR testing should be performed after installation of each segment of the network. Figures 4-15
and 4-16 show examples of tests performed from the end of the last installed link toward the OLT in the CO.
Bidirectional testing with an OTDR is important because for some events, such as for a splice between two fibers with
a slightly different geometry, the loss found with an OTDR varies for different testing directions. Averaging the losses
from a bidirectional measurement will eliminate the impact of fiber geometry and will provide the true loss values.
It is sometimes useful to test from the CO toward the splitter(s) and all the way to the ONTs. However, when many
distribution fibers are being tested, the reflection of each of the different fibers will be combined and the interpretation
of the trace OTDR will become more difficult and often not possible.
For further information, refer to the following article on our website (www.EXFO.com):
• Fiber-Optic Testing Challenges in Point-to-Multipoint PON Testing
http://documents.EXFO.com/appnotes/anote110-ang.pdf
CO FDH
Drop
p
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber Drop
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop
p ONT
Terminal
CO FDH
Drop
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber Drop
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop ONT
Terminal
Wh
to
No
Bit Rate Class 1490 nm Power (dBm) Standards The downstream power at 1550 and
(Mbit/s) OLT Tx ONT Rx 1490 nm must meet the minimum ONT
Min Max Sens. Over receiver sensitivity (depending on the
155.52 A -6 0 -27 -5 G.983/G.984 series PON class). The upstream power should
B -4 +2 -30 -8 correspond to the ONT specifications. If
C -2 +4 -33 -11 the optical power level is insufficient, refer
622.08 A -6 -1 -27 -6 G.983/G.984 series
to Chapter 6 and perform the
B -1 +4 -27 -6
C -1 +4 -32 -11
troubleshooting steps. Perform other
1000 (nominal) -1 +4 -24 EPON: 1000BASE-PX10 troubleshooting steps as necessary to
-1 +4 -27 EPON: 1000BASE-PX20 correct the problem. Similarly, the
1244.16 A -3/-2+2/+3-24/-23 -3/-8 G.983/G.983 series upstream power at 1310 nm must meet
B -2 +3 -28 -7/-13 minimum criteria to be properly detected
C +2 +7 -29 -8/-14 at the OLT. Knowing the worst-case
2488.32 A G.984 series
optical power budget, it is simple to define
B
C
a minimum optical power value that the
1310 nm signal must have at the ONT
Table 5-2. PON optical loss budget requirements for single-fiber topology (Rx max. power sensitivity output.
is called “overload”)
When all problems have been corrected and the measured power level at the drop is sufficient, connect the drop directly
to the ONT.
Note: It is crucial to understand that the 1310 nm signal transmitted upstream by the ONT is, by nature, a burst and
is not continuous. For this reason, the power of the ONT must be detected with the appropriate instrument.
Meter
ONT
CO FDH Drop
ONT
TerminalDrop
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber
Voice WDM
Data
ONT
Coupler
OLT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop
Terminal
ONT
Figure 5-2. PON power meter connected between the drop and the ONT
6. Network Troubleshooting
m
Guide PON.3-ang: Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 11:00 AM Page 48
6. Network Troubleshooting
Troubleshooting a PON first involves locating and identifying the source of an optical problem in what may be a complex
optical network topology that includes several splitters, fibers and ONTs. Figure 6-1 shows a multisplitter topology
network with multiple splitters. The numbers indicate the different zones where a problem may be located.
Table 6-1 shows how noting which
ONTs are affected can help locate the Neighborhood FDH
problem. If a break occurs in the cable
between the OLT and a downstream .. ONT
The following table shows possible causes and troubleshooting steps for common problems:
CO FDH ONT
Drop
Splitter Terminal
1XN Distribution Fiber
Voice WDM ONT
Data Coupler
OLT
ONT
Optical
Video EDFA
Transmitter
Patch Panel Patch Panel Drop
Terminal
ONT
Figure 6-2. Using a PON power meter for troubleshooting various points in the network
GPON Gigabit-capable passive optical network NF Noise figure (noise from an optical amplifier in dB)
HDD Horizontal direct drilling OC Optical carrier (transport rate)
HDSL High-bit-rate digital subscriber line ODN Optical distribution network
(copper based) ODU Optical distribution unit
HDTV High-definition television OLT Optical line terminal/termination
HFC Hybrid fiber coaxial transmissions OLTS Optical loss test set
IEC International electrotechnical commission ONT Optical network terminal/termination
IEEE Institute of electrical and electronic engineers ONU Optical network unit (non-transmitting ONT)
ILEC Incumbent local exchange carrier OPM Optical power meter
IP Internet protocol ORL Optical return loss
IPTV Internet protocol television OSA Optical spectrum analyzer
ITU International telecommunication union OSC Optical service channel
ITU-T International telecommunication union— OSNR Optical signal-to-noise ratio
telecommunications standardization sector OSP Outside plant
wavelength
OTDR Optical time-domain reflectometer
LFD Live fiber detector
P2MP Point-to-multipoint
MAN Metropolitan area network
P2P Point-to-point
MFD Mode-field diameter
PBX Private branch exchange
MLM Multilongitudinal mode (Laser)
PC Polished connector
MM Multimode
PIN Positive-insulator-negative (detector)
MMF Multimode fiber
PLC Planar lightwave (or lightguide) circuit
MWM Multiwavelength meter
G.984 series
G.984.2: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (G-PON): Physical Media Dependent (PMD) layer specification
G.984.4: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (G PON): ONT management and control interface specification
G.984.5: Enhancement band for gigabit capable optical access networks
G.984.6: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (GPON): Reach extension
G.985: 100 Mbit/s point-to-point Ethernet based optical access system
IEEE 802.3ah—2004: IEEE standard for information technology, telecommunications and information exchange
between systems—local and metropolitan area networks. Specific requirements Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access
with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Amendment: Media Access
Control Parameters, Physical Layers and Management Parameters for Subscriber Access Networks
9. Appendix
Guide PON.3-ang: Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 11:00 AM Page 62
9. Appendix
PON Classification
1. ONU
1.1 ONU installed inside premises
1.2 ONU installed outside premises
2. Drop terminals/drop cables
2.1 ODN installed using drop terminal and drop cables
2.2 ODN installed without drop terminal and drop cables (F2 directly to ONU)
3. Splitter
3.1 ODN using single splitter with maximum split ratio
3.2 ODN using multistage splitter with various split ratios
4. F1
4.1 F1 with no redundancy
4.2 F1 using redundancy
5. Video
5.1 PON without video distribution
5.2 PON including video distribution
5.2.1 PON with overlaid analog RF video
5.2.2 PON with digital IPTV
6. Monitoring
6.1 PON without optical/physical monitoring
6.2 PON with optical/physical monitoring
Notes
Notes
Acknowledgements
This guide would not have been possible without the enthusiasm and teamwork of EXFO staff, particularly the hard
work and technical expertise of Mr. Benoît Masson, Senior Product Manager, and Dr. André Girard, Senior Member of
Technical Staff, who also plays a prominent role in the following international organizations:
• Member of ITU-T SG15 on Optical and Other Transport Technologies
• International Convenor of IEC SC86B WG7 on Passive Components
• Chairman of Canada IEC TC86 National Committee
• Co-Chair of TIA SC FO-4.3 (Interconnecting Devices and Passive Components)
• Canada Liaison to ANSI IEC Technical Advisory Group
ISBN 1-55342-002-0
Legal Deposit—National Library of Canada 2004
Legal Deposit—National Library of Quebec 2004
© 2008 EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc., Quebec City, Canada. All Rights Reserved.
FTTx PON Guide: Testing Passive Optical Networks, 3rd edition
Cover PON_3: Cover Guide PON.2AN 5/21/08 11:02 AM Page 2