In the 9/11 Era of

Environmental Terror

Environmental–Terror–Lunatics
rely upon lies, fear–mongering,
misconceptions, coercion,
threats, deceptions, terror,
and paranoid conspiracies.

They concoct fraudulent

and non–existent
alarmist issues such as
the so–called problems with DDT
as well as the imaginary threat of
pest control products !

These Enviro–Basterds
cannot be trusted !
P A RT 4 Key points in this Outlook :
S C I E N T I F IC E VA LU AT IO N , • UN agencies are mis-
leading the public by claim-
R E A SO N S F O R S U CC E SS ing that malaria can be
controlled without insecti-
IN MALARIA CONTROL, AND cides, notably DDT. The
stated aim is to stop DDT
P U B L I C MIS–STATEMENTS use globally by 2020.

• UN agencies are com-

mitting scientific fraud by
deliberately and incorrectly
interpreting data on ma-
laria control using non–
J a nu a r y 2 01 1 insecticide methods.

R o g e r B at e , D on a ld R ob e r t s, R i c ha r d T re n • While DDT is no pana-

cea, it is still a critical
A E I O ut l o o k Se r i e s weapon in the battle
against malaria and other
insect-borne diseases.
S e l e ct ed an d ad ap te d e x ce r p t s
Countries in Latin America were FO R CE D
AW A Y F R O M U S IN G D D T in compliance
with the North American Free Trade
Agreement, wherein the Commission for
Environmental Cooperation of North
America ( CEC ) P R ES S U R E D Mexico in
the mid–1990s to S T OP P RO D U C T IO N For over seventy years, DDT
has been a vital insecticide
AND USE OF DDT. in the battle against disease.

Without DDT, countries used MORE EX- Yet it is vilified for largely il-
legitimate concerns about its
PENSIVE insecticides, which had to be impact on the environment
S P R A YE D MO R E F R E Q U E N T L Y , creating and human health.
P R O BL E MS for malaria control.
Through a mix of environ-
mental fervour, self–
Over time, the countries in Central Amer- interest, and disregard for
ica moved to greater use of pharmaco– evidence–based policy,
United Nations (UN) agen-
suppression. cies are misleading the pub-
lic about DDT ― mistakenly
Malaria cases have FA LL E N as a result of claiming it is not needed and
can be eliminated globally by
this wide–spread and E X PE N S IV E distri- 2020.
bution of malaria treatments, but NO T
through the environmental controls Such claims must be with-
drawn, and the aggressive
touted by the United Nations. timeline for the elimination
of DDT must be shelved.
Officials of Global Environment Facility
( GEF ), United Nations Environment Pro-
gram ( UNEP ), and the Secretariat, how-
ever, IG N O R E the use of pharmaco–
suppression in their discussion of success-
ful malaria control in Mexico and Central
America.
 The decline of malaria CANNOT be attributed
to environmental interventions

Furthermore, these officials F AL SE L Y AT -

T R IB U T E changes in malaria burdens to
Global Environment Facility's environ-
mental interventions. Furthermore, the World
Health Assembly, the gov-
erning body of the World
A separate epidemiological evaluation, Health Organization, must
which was designed to measure any prioritize the needs of malar-
ial countries ahead of the po-
changes in disease rates, found N O S TA - litical agenda of UN agencies
T IS T IC A L D IF F E R E N C E S in malaria rates and set a positive agenda for
in demonstration areas versus in control the use of DDT and the de-
velopment of much–needed
areas, and this was consistent across ALL new public–health insecti-
eight countries. cides.

Independent donors should

Malaria rates in most countries were FAL- continue to fund DDT use
LING, but with NO difference between the where needed for malaria
demonstration areas and controls, the control.
D E C L IN E C A N N O T BE A T T R IB U T E D T O
The campaign against DDT
T H E E N V IR O N ME N T A L IN T E R VE N T IO N S . means it is used far less than
is efficient or desired by ma-
laria–control programs.
But United Nations Environment Program
( UNEP ), Global Environment Facility
( GEF ), the Secretariat, and other offi-
cials IGNORED those findings.
Furthermore, despite the fact that the control areas were a crucially impor-
tant part of the project, they were N O T E VE N ME N T IO N E D in the 2008 final
report.

Ultimately, the success of reduction in malaria was most likely entirely due
to pharmaco–suppression.

One might wonder W H Y A C O N T R OL PR O G R A M W O U L D RE Q U IR E IN S E C -

T IC ID E S and vector control if pharmaco–suppression is such a powerful
method of malaria control.

This is a complex issue, but it is important to note that even though reduc-
tions in malaria cases have been achieved in Mexico and Central America, its
model of wide–spread distribution of the anti–malarial drugs c h lo r oq u i ne and
p r i m a q u in e is NO T T R A NS F E R AB LE ELS EW H E R E .

First, wide–spread drug resistance to ch l o r oq u i ne in Africa and South–East

Asia would make the intervention LA R GE L Y U S EL ES S there.

Second, p r i m a q u i ne is a radical treatment for v i v a x m a l a r ia , whereas in Af-

rica over 90 per cent of malaria cases are caused by the more deadly strain
of f a l c ip a r u m ma l a r i a .

Third, pharmaco–suppression is E XP EN S IV E and R E Q U IR E S MO R E S O -

P H IS T IC A T E D H E A L T H S YS T E MS T H AN E X IS T IN MO S T O F A F R IC A , where
the greatest incidence of malaria lies.

So even if United Nations Environment Program ( UNEP ), Global Environ-

ment Facility ( GEF ), and their partners were straightforward about the
R E A L RE AS O N F O R T H E D E CL IN E S IN MA L A R IA in the project areas, there
would be N O R EA SO N A BL E A R G U ME N T that it has any application in other
areas, or any usefulness for global malaria–control policy.
We believe the MO T IV A T IO N S of United Nations Environment Program (
UNEP ) and Global Environment Facility ( GEF ) are N O T to improve global
malaria policies, but to G A IN C O N T R OL A N D P OW E R O VE R T H E U S E O F
IN S E C T IC ID E S .

There could be multiple motivations for seeking greater control over insecti-
cides, and one can and should be ever mindful of the fact that governmental
and inter–governmental agencies C O NT IN U A L L Y S E E K TO R E MA IN R E L E -
V A N T and to E XP A N D T H E IR P RO G R AMS , P OW E R , and B U D G E TS .

The Global Environment Facility is making

NO practical contributions to solving
pressing problems of insecticide resistance,
finding improved insecticides, or improving
how DDT and other insecticides can be
used to control malaria
 Far from being an impartial arbiter and defender
of sound scientific evaluation in the debate over DDT,
the UN is merely a conduit for anti–DDT interests

D o n a ld R obe r t s is Emeritus Professor of Tropical Medicine at

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

droberts@usuhs.mil

R i c h a r d T re n is the Executive Director of Africa Fighting Malaria.

rtren@fightingmalaria.org

R o g e r B at e is the Legatum Fellow in Global Prosperity at Ameri-

can Enterprise Institute for Public Policy.

roger.bate@aei.org
LET ’S PAUSE …
AN D L OOK AT SOM E ALARM IN G ST AT IST IC S

It has been predicted that so–called GLOBAL WARMING

will affect the Arctic, as well as the African and Asian
countries, North America, and Europe.

Consequently, it is expected that dozens of millions of

refugees will be created, and that famine will affect 80
to 200 million people.

We should all be reminded that many experts view

GLOBAL WARMING as purely SPECULATIVE.

We are also advised to get a grasp on factual existing

problems that plague our entire planet.

As we speak, we have real problems, with poverty,

AIDS, polluted drinking water, and Malaria, which are
afflicting and killing many times more people than
global warming ever will.

Hunger is the most extreme form of poverty.

Presently, 854 million people across the world are hun-

gry.

Every day, almost 16,000 children DIE from hunger–

related causes ― almost 6 MILLION CHILDREN DIE
ANNUALLY due to hunger.

The latest statistics on the world epidemic of AIDS and

HIV indicate that 39½ million people are living with it.

AIDS deaths for 2006 were 2.9 million, despite recent

improvements to access to anti–retroviral treatment.

Equally serious is the fact that a world–wide shortage

of fresh drinking water affects forty per cent of the
planet’s population.

Each year, 11 MILLION PEOPLE DIE of diseases related

to water that is not clean enough for consumption.

Finally, some observers believe that Malaria acutely af-

flicts MORE THAN 515 MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR.
515 MILLION PEOPLE is MORE PEOPLE than live in Canada, the United States, and Mexico,
combined.

Two–thirds of all Malaria cases occur in Africa.

Additionally, Malaria causes more than 1 MILLION DEATHS PER YEAR, principally among
children under the age of five years and pregnant women.

At least eighty–six per cent of these deaths are in Sub–Saharan Africa.

Globally, an estimated 3,000 women, children, and infants DIE from Malaria every day.

Twelve billion dollars per year is lost to Malaria.

In some countries, more people die of Malaria than HIV/AIDS ― and recently, a new study
showed that people who contract Malaria become more likely to spread HIV.

For over one–half century, DDT has been used as part of the solution to one of the world’s
great problems.

Through the policies of depraved indifference of Environmental Terror Organizations, DDT

has been prohibited in a manner that can only be described as « Eco–Manslaughter ».

E R AD IC AT IN G MALAR IA WITH DDT

Malaria has wrought an enormous economic toll, by incapacitating otherwise productive

people.

The burden of Malaria costs Sub–Saharan Africa an estimated twelve billion dollars per year.

Thousands survive the disease with brain damage, thus keeping millions at home to care for
them.

It is the principal reason why people in Africa are living in abject poverty.

Both North America and Europe have not harboured Malarial mosquitoes since the 1940s.

This was accomplished through the use of a range of public health measures, as well as
generally increasing health and living standards.

In fact, the beginning of the decline of Malaria was due principally to the drainage of
swamp–land and the removal of mill–ponds.
It had been known since 1914 that Malaria could be
controlled by fluctuating water levels.

Nonetheless, DDT contributed to the final eradication

of Malaria in the developed world.

In 1955, the World Health Organization ( WHO ) began

a program to eradicate Malaria throughout the ENTIRE
world.

The program RELIED GREATLY upon the application of

DDT to control mosquitoes, with a practice called DDT
Residual House Spraying.

As a result of this program, by 1967, Malaria was

eradicated from all developed countries where Malaria
was endemic.

Large areas of tropical Asia and Latin America were

freed from the risk of infection.

In Sub–Saharan Africa, the campaign was only

launched in three countries since it was not considered
feasible in the others.

Swaziland and Mozambique are examples of countries

that have very successfully REDUCED Malaria infestations with DDT.

Throughout the years, spectacular DECREASES in Malaria infections and deaths were seen
after implementing an extensive anti–mosquito program with DDT.

Here are five examples. ―

• India ■ 1945 • Skri Lanka ( Ceylon ) ■ 1946

■ Almost 1 million Malaria l deaths re- ■ 28 million cases of Malaria
ported
Skri Lanka ■ 1961
India ■ 1960 ■ Only 110 cases were reported
■ Only a few thousand cases were
reported Skri Lanka ■ 1969
■ The DDT program was halted,
and Malaria rebounded with 2½
• Venezuela ■ 1943 million cases
■ 817,000 Malaria l deaths reported

Venezuela ■ 1958
■ Only 800 cases were reported
• South Africa ( KwaZulu Natal Province )
■ 1996
■ DDT was stopped and the number of
MALARIAL deaths rose from 8,000 to
42,000
• Republic of China ( Taiwan ) ■ 1945
South Africa ( KwaZulu Natal Province )
■ 2000
■ There was a 400 per cent in-
crease in Malaria deaths
South Africa ( KwaZulu Natal Province )
■ Modern day
■ After the return of DDT, com-
bined with the introduction of new
therapies to treat Malaria patients,
MALARIAL deaths have been re-
duced to less than 50 per year
■ 1 million cases of MALARIA. DDT was
soon adopted
Republic of China ■ 1969
■ Only 9 cases were reported, and
shortly thereafter, Malaria was
eradicated from the island

In 1970, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences summed up the situation with the following
excerpt from their book Life Sciences. ―

« To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT. [ … ] In little more
than two decades, DDT has prevented 500 million human deaths, due to MALARIA, that
otherwise would be inevitable. »

The situation concerning Malaria eradication can be summarized with the three following
points ―

• DDT contributed to the final eradication of Malaria in the developed world

• Spectacular decreases in Malaria infections and deaths were seen after im-
plementing anti–mosquito program using DDT

• Our modern day world of politicized science refuses to admit that DDT has
prevented hundreds of millions of deaths with its life–saving eradication of
human diseases

For over one–half century, DDT has been used as part of the solution to one of the world’s
great problems.

Through the policies of depraved indifference of Environmental–Terror–Organizations, DDT

will be prohibited in a manner that can only be described as « Eco–Manslaughter ».

Additionally, these Enviro–Terror–Organizations prefer seeing money wasted on investigat-

ing myths like so–called GLOBAL WARMING rather that solving some REAL world problems,
such as with POVERTY, AIDS, POLLUTED DRINKING WATER, and MALARIA, which are afflict-
ing and killing many times more people than GLOBAL WARMING ever will.
Force Of Nature presents THE WHOLE TRUTH FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE from National Organization Responding Against HUJE that
seek to harm the Green Space Industry (NORAHG). It is a series of Reports destined for the Green Space Industry, the Environmental Terror
Movement, Governments, and the Media, nationwide across Canada, the United States, and overseas. The information presented in Force Of
Nature has been developed for the education and entertainment of the reader by providing a sequence of historical events WITH COMMEN-
TARY. The neutrality of these Reports might be disputed. Don’t thank us. It’s a public service. And we are glad to do it.

HUJE are identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts. Even though each Enviro Lunatic Culprit is a mis-
guided adversary, each still deserves our respect. The use of the terms Lunatic, Maniac, Culprit, Terrorist, or Basterd are not accusations of any
legal wrong doing. Force Of Nature is simply holding Enviro Lunatic Activists accountable for conspiring to change public policies that TERROR-
IZE, HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Industry.

HUJE is a term used to describe Enviro Lunatic Activists that routinely concoct FEAR MONGERING, FRAUDULENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, CO-
ERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES that are DESIGNED to SCAM and DECEIVE the public into believing
there is some IMAGINARY DANGER with conventional pest control products. HUJE also SCAM and DECEIVE Government Officials into the
NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS CONSPIRACY to PROHIBIT conventional pest control products that are FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIEN-
TIFICALLY SAFE, TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE, and ABSOLUTELY INDISPENSABLE.

HUJE have created LOSS OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANKRUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, inflicting DESPAIR and DESTITUTION for
THOUSANDS of hapless victims throughout the Green Space Industry. The DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE of Lunatic Culprit Terrorist Basterd HUJE
is viewed as a form of TERROR, HARM, and THREAT against the Green Space Industry.

This Report provides NO guarantee regarding accuracy or completeness. In no event shall Force Of Nature be liable for any incidental or conse-
quential damages, lost profits, or any indirect damages. Force Of Nature is TOTALLY INDEPENDENT of any trade association or business oper-
ating within the Green Space Industry. The events, characters, companies, and organizations, depicted in this Report are not always fictitious.
Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, may not be coincidental. All information, excerpts, and pictures contained in this Report were
found somewhere on the Internet, and may be considered in the public domain, serving one of the following purposes ― archive, education,
promotion, publicity, or press release.

Force Of Nature, and its various incarnations, is the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his colleagues. Mr. Gathercole is a principal FOUN-
DER of the Modern Professional Lawn Care Industry in BOTH Ontario and Quebec. He holds a degree in Horticulture from the UNIVERSITY OF
GUELPH, and another pure and applied science degree from McGILL UNIVERSITY. He has worked in virtually all aspects of the Green Space In-
dustry, including GOLF, PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE, and CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, and has served in environmental compliance, government
negotiations, public affairs, and workplace safety. Mr. Gathercole has supervised, consulted, programmed, and/or overseen the successful and
safe execution of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pest control applications in the urban landscape. He has trained, instructed, and consulted
with THOUSANDS of turf managers and technicians. Mr. Gathercole has also been an agricultural agronomist. For many years, Mr. Gathercole
was a contributing columnist for TURF & Recreation Magazine, Canada’s Turf and Grounds Maintenance Authority.

Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues have followed the evolution of LUNATIC ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM for over a quarter century. For FIF-
TEEN YEARS, the strategies designed and implemented by Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues guaranteed the control of the VERMIN OF ENVI-
RONMENTAL TERROR for the entire Modern Green Space Industry across Canada. Their involvement in Environmental Issues reached a fe-
vered pitch in the 1990s, when he orchestrated, with his colleagues, legal action against the Forces of Environmental Evil in the Town of Hud-
son, Quebec.

Today, Mr. Gathercole is the ONLY TRUE RELIABLE WITNESS of the Hudson Affair. Mr. Gathercole is personally credited for crafting the Golf
Industry Exception Status that endures to this day. He is also the creator of the signs that are now used for posting after application. His vast
knowledge of our long journey with Environmental Issues is UNDENIABLE ― hopefully ! Mr. Gathercole is now retired, although his name con-
tinues to appear as FOUNDER of Force Of Nature.

THE LIBRARY OF REPORTS • 2,4–D • A LOOK AT Career Management • A LOOK AT Pests & Disorders of Trees & Shrubs • A LOOK
AT Pests & Disorders of Turfgrasses • Agriculture • ALBERTA Enviro Terror • Bee Colony Collapse Disorder • Bee Colony Collapse Dis-
order • Benefits of the Turfgrass Industry • Books That Screwed Up the World • BRITISH COLUMBIA Enviro Terror Conspiracy •
CALGARY (Alberta) Enviro Terror STOPPED • Cancer Maniac Stuff • CARNAGE Caused by Prohibition Terrorism • CONSEQUENCES of
Prohibition Terrorism • Controversial Prohibitions • Culprits, Lunatics and Maniacs Who Conspired to Prohibit • Daffodils ― Toxic Pes-
ticide Treated Daffodils Soaked Formaldehyde • Dating Services for Enviro Maniacs • DDT and Our World of Politicized Science • Death
and Illness (Alleged) • Departure Letters • Environmental Terror That NEVER Ends • Environmental TERROR Talk and Weasel Words •
Environmental Terrorists UNMASKED • Environmental Terror Organizations • Enviro Profit Accumulated by Greedy & Avaricious Enviro Ma-
niacs • Famous Quotations About Enviro Maniacs • Fertilizer Enviro Terror That NEVER Ends • Food and Farming • Global Warming
― The Scam of Our Lifetime • Golf Industry • Halloween Terror • Happy Holidays • Health Canada • Health Concerns with Pest
Control Products • Heroes Speaking Out Against Environmental Terror • History of Environmental Terror in Canada • Lying Sacs of (En-
viro Maniac) Cwap • Mock Advertisements • Mock Speeches • Myth Busting • NATIONAL Enviro Terror Conspiracy • NEW
BRUNSWICK Enviro Terror • NO Prohibition Exception for AGRICULTURE Industry • NO Prohibition Exception for GOLF Industry • North
America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) • ONTARIO ― Haven For Environmental Terror • Pesticide Q & A (Questions and Answers) •
Positive Waves (Interesting and Innovative Thinking) • PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND (PEI) Enviro Terror • QUEBEC Prohibition Terror • Ra-
chel Carson • SASKATCHEWAN Enviro Terror Infestation • Satire, Laughs & Insanity • THE AVENGERS • The Successes of Trade As-
sociations • The Failure of BOGUS Green Alternatives • The Failure of BOGUS Organic Golf Courses • The Failure of BROWN Golf
Courses • The Failure of Integrated Pest Management • The Failure of Pesticide Free Parks • The Failures of Pesticide Manufacturers •
The Failures of Trade Associations • The Industry Strikes Back in Ontario • The Wilhelm Scream • The Wisdom of REAL Experts •
TWISTED Precautionary Principle • United States Enviro Terror • Victories Against the Vermin of Enviro Terrorism • Video and Audio •
Violating Federal Law • Warnings and Updates • Weapons of Ultimate Environmental Terror • Wind Power (Bogus)