Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clinical engineering
Medical devices
intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals,
and which does not achieve any of its primary intended purposes through chemical
action and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of
any of its primary intended purposes.
Medical devices can be regulated and classified (in the US) as shown below:
Class I devices present minimal potential for harm to the user and are often simpler
in design than Class II or Class III devices. Devices in this category include tongue
depressors, bedpans, elastic bandages, examination gloves, and hand-held surgical
instruments and other similar types of common equipment.
Class II devices are subject to special controls in addition to the general controls of
Class I devices. Special controls may include special labelling requirements,
mandatory performance standards, and post market surveillance. Devices in this
class are typically non-invasive and include x-ray machines, PACS, powered
wheelchairs, infusion pumps, and surgical drapes.
Class III devices require premarket approval, a scientific review to ensure the
device's safety and effectiveness, in addition to the general controls of Class I.
Examples include replacement heart valves, silicone gel-filled breast implants,
implanted cerebellar simulators, implantable pacemaker pulse generators and
endosseous (intra-bone) implants.
Medical Imaging
Imaging technologies are often essential to medical diagnosis, and are typically the
most complex equipment found in a hospital including:
Fluoroscopy
Nuclear Medicine
Tomography
Ultrasound
Electron Microscopy
[edit] Tissue engineering
One of the goals of tissue engineering is to create artificial organs for patients that
need organ transplants. Biomedical engineers are currently researching methods of
creating such organs. In one case bladders have been grown in lab and transplanted
successfully into patients[1]. Bioartificial organs, which utilize both synthetic and
biological components, are also a focus area in research, such as with hepatic assist
devices that utilize liver cells within an artificial bioreactor construct[2].
Regulatory issues are never far from the mind of a biomedical engineer. To satisfy
safety regulations, most biomedical systems must have documentation to show that
they were managed, designed, built, tested, delivered, and used according to a
planned, approved process. This is thought to increase the quality and safety of
diagnostics and therapies by reducing the likelihood that needed steps can be
accidentally omitted again.
In the United States, biomedical engineers may operate under two different
regulatory frameworks. Clinical devices and technologies are generally governed by
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a similar fashion to pharmaceuticals.
Biomedical engineers may also develop devices and technologies for consumer use,
such as physical therapy devices, which may be governed by the Consumer Product
Safety Commission. See US FDA 510(k) documentation process for the US
government registry of biomedical devices.
Other countries typically have their own mechanisms for regulation. In Europe, for
example, the actual decision about whether a device is suitable is made by the
prescribing doctor, and the regulations are to assure that the device operates as
expected. Thus in Europe, the governments license certifying agencies, which are
for-profit. Technical committees of leading engineers write recommendations which
incorporate public comments and are adopted as regulations by the European
Union. These recommendations vary by the type of device, and specify tests for
safety and efficacy. Once a prototype has passed the tests at a certification lab, and
that model is being constructed under the control of a certified quality system, the
device is entitled to bear a CE mark, indicating that the device is believed to be safe
and reliable when used as directed.
The different regulatory arrangements sometimes result in technologies being
developed first for either the U.S. or in Europe depending on the more favourable
form of regulation. Most safety-certification systems give equivalent results when
applied diligently. Frequently, once one such system is satisfied, satisfying the other
requires only paperwork.
Training