Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Don't Persecute
1The following women can verify that Mitch Ring is heterosexual: Lori Mangnall, So. Lake Tahoe, CA. Mary Hashem,
Denver, CO; Sherry (Dastrup) Knobloch, San Diego, CA; Lucy Gilbert, Concord, MA; Elizabeth Stewart [Married name unknown -
she's a lawyer; daughter of a former Utah Supreme Court Justice], Salt Lake City, UT; Karin Nilsson, Sacramento, CA; Mary Ann
Maxwell [Married name unknown], Tennessee; Lori Gray [married name unknown], Sacramento, CA; _______ ______, Sacramento,
CA; Kristin (Christensen) Sampson, Salt Lake City, UT; Kristin (Northop) Niedermeyer, West Jordan, Utah.
Παγε 1 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
SINGLE MOTHERS WHO END UP SINGLE FOR LIFE, OR MARRYING LESS THAN
THEY DESERVE. When a male homosexual experiments with heterosexuality, after
marrying and having a child or children, and then realizes he doesn't want to continue,
what for him, is inferior sexual interaction, then negative consequences are inflicted on
his ex-wife and children. The woman is left a single mother, and as potential
companions evaluate her, she gets negative points from potential companions because
they have to raise someone else's child or children. Or a potential companion might
have the finances to participate in a 1- or 2-kid family, want 1 or 2 kids that are his, and
exclude her. She will be a single mother and alone for a while, if not for life, and at best,
will marry less than she deserved. Not hypothetical: Happened to Lori Atkinson, a
beautiful, engaging conversationalist, BYU graduate in English, from the author's
hometown ward (Mormon term for congregation). A study in sexually-conservative
religions like Mormonism and Catholicism where-homosexuals-are-pressured-to-
experiment-with-heterosexuality, would be useful data for policy formation: A poll of
women who married homosexuals-trying-heterosexuality - what percentage had a child
from a man who was really homosexual; what percentage remarried; what percentage
never remarried; what percentage remarried with a spouse less than they deserve; and
what percentage were infected with AIDS or a venereal disease from their really-
homosexual spouses. The book, Husbands Who Love Men, published by AMI
Publishers, Providence, Utah, © 1998, Aileen H. Atwood R.N., M.S.N., Ed.D. discusses
the topic of homosexuals pressured to be heterosexual, and the negative consequences.
2) MALE HOMOSEXUALS HAVE HIGHER RATES OF SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED
DISEASES. In 2004, about 64% of reported early-stage syphilis infections occurred
among men who had sex with men. Considering that only about 4.5% of men are
homosexual, and they contract 64% of the syphilis cases, they have an infection rate
that is 37.7 times higher than the heterosexual community.2 Speaking as a member of
the heterosexual community, I don't want homosexuals pressured to mingle with the
heterosexual community. 3) FAMILIES HAVE TO EXCLUDE ABOUT 1-IN-27 KIDS OR
GRANDKIDS. Considering that research indicates that 4 to 5% of men are homosexual,
or an average of 4.5%; and that 2 to 4% of women are lesbians, or an average of 3%.
Using the approximation that 50% of people are men, the average rate of homosexuality
for both sexes is 3.75%, or about 1 out of 26.7 people. If you have 3 kids, they all marry
that's 6 people. If 2 of those couples have 4 kids, and the last couple has 3 kids, that's a
total of 17 people; and if all the grandkids get married, that's a total of 27 people.
Statistically, one of them is likely to be homosexual, and divorce leaving the other
spouse to be a single parent, and reducing the quality of their eventual lifetime
companion. Another view: If you have 5 kids, and they all have 5 kids, one of your kids
or grandkids will be homosexual - do you want to reject them?
Παγε 2 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
were forbidden to eat pigs (swine). 3 They had the observe-and-conclude ability to
observe a higher death rate among pig eaters; although they lacked a microscope to be
aware of trichinosis. In modern times, we have discarded that archaic prohibition, and
enjoy ham, pork chops, and pork roast. We should still avoid bacon and sausage
because of the cholesterol. 2) The ancient Jews were forbidden to eat lobster and crab.4
They had the observe-and-conclude ability to see people die overnight from eating them.
We now know that if you boil them alive, they are safe to eat. [The cruelty of the practice
is indeed debatable.] 3) The ancient Jewish people stoned people for adultery - even
2,000 years ago, Jesus condemned the cruelty and excessiveness of that practice.5 4)
The Jews considered divorce to be unethical; but reluctantly accepted it as a necessary
practice.6 Most Americans, including many Catholics, no longer consider divorce to be
unethical.
3Leviticus 11:7-8.
4Leviticus 11:9-12.
5John 8:3-11.
6Divorce was unethical: Matthew 14:3-4 and Luke 16:18, but was practiced even Before Christ:
Matthew 19:6-8.
7CONSIDERING THE RATE OF A SURVIVABLE MUTATION, AND THAT LIFE EXISTED 3.5 BILLION YEARS AGO, ALL LIFE
COULD HAVE ARISEN FROM ONE ORGANISM. Rate at which a survivable mutation occurs in viruses: Once every 33 years. In a PBS
special on AIDS circa 1992 - Human HIV was only 3 mutations away from the then-known version of SIDS (Simeon [monkey] Immune
Deficiency Syndrome). Bacteria called archaea existed 3.5 billion years ago [Science, 4/23/4 in
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/04/23/science.lava.reut/index.html.] Dividing 3.5 billion years by a survivable mutation every 33
years gives 106,060,606 (106 million) generations of survivable mutations. Considering that 29 is 1,024, or about 1,000, that's 10106,060,597
possible organisms.
Considering the rate of survivable mutations, the time that life has been on Earth, and that God didn't get around to creating his
masterpiece and likeness for 3.495 billion years, the much-more-likely conclusion is that humankind is the end product of a series of fortunate-
for-us mutations.
When myths are used to hurt people, they need to be ignored. Socrates was made to drink hemlock juice because he didn't accept
Greek myths as fact. Judaeo-Christianity are just myths - less story and more ethics than Greek or Roman Myths. Prophets are just people
who fortified an ethical standard or best-practice-for-the-era with "And God said so." To whatever extent these myths anesthetized the
emotional pain of the death of a loved one, or your death, or achieved ethical behavior, that's great, and needs to be continued. When myths
are counterproductive to societal benefit, they need to be labeled as myths and ignored - at some point, you have to tell your kids 'there's no
Santa Claus,' or your grandkids are going to have lousy Christmases. But when myths are used to hurt people, the myths need to be
appropriately labeled, and ignored.
Παγε 3 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
8Leviticus 20:13
9Genesis 19:1-29
10Romans 1;27; 1 Corinthians 6:9, and 1 Timothy 1:10.
11"LDS Church Asks Members to Take Stand on Marriage Amendment,"
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=282003.
12The Articles of Faith, at the end of The Pearl of Great Price, p. 61 in the 1981 seminary institute set
of scriptures.
Παγε 4 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
the house of relatives who were victims of house-burning-level "religious" hatred: Two of
his great grandparents converted to the Mennonite faith in Russia around 1910: Their
home was burned and they came to America. The author guesses America is better
than Russia: When Americans persecute a minority religious view, we don't burn homes
anymore, we just pass laws against minority religious views. 20/20 hindsight has always
revealed that when religion is used to hurt people, religion was misguided: The stoning
of adulterers; the crusades; jihad; the Spanish inquisition; the Moslem-Christian clashes
in Czechoslavakia and Yugoslavia; the current Moslem terrorism activities against the
United States; the burning of Copernicus, and the lifetime imprisonment of Galilei
Galileo for saying that the Sun, not the Earth was the center of the solar system;
Mormons withholding the priesthood from Africans; and the Mormon Meadows
Massacre. As a society and a country, we've progressed from burning homes,
murdering, imprisonment, and withholding religious privilege and ceremonies, in the
name of religion to only preventing people from getting married. The practice is still
stone throwing, and as usual with religious persecution, it's misguided. The current no-
marriage-for-homosexuals amendment doesn't "protect" marriage - adult heterosexuals
can already marry to whatever extent they want. The no-marriage-for-homosexuals
amendment is stone throwing at homosexuals. If your, or your constituents' stone-
throwing against homosexuality finds its roots in religious belief, then you must vote
against the ban-on-homosexual-marriage amendment. A ban on homosexual marriage
violates freedom of religion, and the separation of church and state.
Παγε 5 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
about 1-out-of-27 of their kids and grandkids. Most of America has abandoned the
archaic religious practices of not eating pork, not eating lobster, stoning adulterers, and
considering divorce to be a sin: We should also abandon the archaic practice of harming
homosexuals. The current no-marriage-for-homosexuals amendment doesn't "protect"
marriage - adult heterosexuals can already marry to whatever extent they want. The no-
marriage-for-homosexuals amendment is stone throwing at homosexuals. The freedom
or religion amendment, and the practice of separating church and state, requires that the
ban-on-homosexual-marriage amendment not even be brought to a vote.
14Le Vay, S. (1993). The Sexual Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT. p.108.
15The British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (2000).
16Higher percentages: Bailey & Pillard, (1991). "A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation."
Archives of General Psychiatry 48, pp. 1089–96. Lower Percentages: Kendler, Thornton, Gilman, & Kessler,
(2000). "Sexual Orientation in a US National Sample of Twin and Nontwin Sibling Pairs." American Journal
Psychiatry 157, pp. 1843–6.
17Correlation indicates how strongly one variable is related to another. The formula is
Sum (Standard Deviation from the Average for the 2nd variable/Average of 2nd Variable)
(Standard Deviation from the Average for the 2nd variable/Average of 2nd Variable)
Envisioning how close a 2nd ox is to a first ox helps one understand correlation. If an oxbow is placed on the
oxen, as the ox graze in a pasture, or pull a wagon, the oxen have a correlation of 0.999 - the 2nd one is always
close to the first. However, when the oxen are free to graze in an acre pasture, there's very low correlation of
position. A correlation of 0.3 indicates that the variable are related; a correlation greater than 0.5 indicates that
the 2nd dependent variable is strongly-correlated.
18Bailey & Pillard. Same source.
Παγε 6 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
Παγε 7 οφ 8
According to Research, Homosexually is Genetically-, or Womb-Environment-Caused;
Don't Persecute
Παγε 8 οφ 8