Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Carbon coated on NiO/MgO in a core/shell nanostructure was synthesized by the single-step RAPET
Received 2 June 2010 (reaction under autogenic pressure at elevated temperatures) technique, and the obtained formation
Received in revised form 13 February 2011 mechanism of the core/shell nanocomposite was presented. The carbon-coated NiO/MgO and its sup-
Accepted 16 February 2011
ported Pd catalyst, Pd/(NiO/MgO@C), were characterized by SEM, HR-TEM, XRD and cyclic voltammetry.
The X-ray diffraction patterns confirmed the face-centered cubic crystal structure of NiO/MgO. Raman
Keywords:
spectroscopy measurements provided structural evidence for the formation of a NiO/MgO compos-
Core–shell structure
ite and the nature of the coated carbon shell. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
Nanoparticles
Ethanol oxidation
images showed the core and shell morphologies individually. The electrocatalytic properties of the
Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalyst for ethanol oxidation were investigated in an alkaline solution. The results
indicated that the prepared Pd–NiO/MgO@C catalyst has excellent electrocatalytic activity and stability.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.02.067
342 C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347
3.1. XRD
2.2. Preparation of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts
3.13 mL of 0.045 mol L−1 PdCl2 were dissolved in 10 mL of ultrapure water and
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-prepared
60 mg of NiO/MgO@C was added. The solution was mixed by magnetic stirring for 3 h NiO/MgO@C core/shell nanocomposites is shown in Fig. 1(a). Sharp
and ultrasonicated to achieve 20% Pd loading. A freshly prepared aqueous solution and well-defined peaks are observed at 2 values of 36.95, 42.91,
of NaBH4 was added drop wise under N2 atmosphere to the solution to reduce the Pd 62.64, 75.00, and 79.00◦ corresponding to planes of (1 1 1), (2 0 0),
species to form the electrocatalyst, which was then repeatedly washed with distilled
(2 2 0), (3 1 1) and (2 2 2), respectively, according to JCPDS No.
water to remove residual salts, centrifuged, and dried at 70 ◦ C.
024-0712 of NiO/MgO. All these peaks could be indexed to a face-
centered cubic structure with a lattice constant of a = 4.192A◦ of
2.3. Structural characterizations NiO/MgO. The obtained lattice constants matched well with the
JCPDS values of the bulk materials of the NiO/MgO. Due to their very
XRD patterns were collected using a Bruker AXS D* Advance Powder X-ray similar structure, not much difference is observed in the XRD pat-
diffractometer (Cu KR radiation, wavelength 1.5406 Å). High-resolution scanning
electron microscopy (HRSEM) measurements of the products were carried out on
terns of NiO and NiO/MgO. Therefore, the formation of NiO/MgO can
a JEOL-JSM 840 scanning electron microscope operating at 20 and 30 kV. The mor- be identified using the above diffraction peaks. Fig. 1(b) shows the
phologies and nanostructure were further characterized with a JEM-1200EX TEM XRD patterns of the Pd doped on the NiO/MgO@C core/shell struc-
model and a JEOL-2010 HR-TEM model using an accelerating voltage of 80 and ture. The strong diffraction peaks observed at 2 values of 40.10◦ ,
200 kV, respectively. SAEDS (selected area energy dispersive X-ray analysis) of one
46.49◦ and 68.08◦ , correspond to the (1 1 1), (2 0 0) and (2 2 0) facets
individual particle was conducted using a JEOL-2010 HR-TEM model. The Olympus
BX41 (Jobin Yvon Horiba) Raman spectrometer was employed, using the 514.5 nm of Pd nanocrystals. The application of the Debye–Scherrer formula
line of an Ar laser as the excitation source to analyze the nature of the carbon present to the strongest diffraction peaks for Pd at 39.9◦ gives a crystallite
around the core particle. size of 12.0 nm.
C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347 343
Fig. 2. SEM images of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (a–c), EDAX spectrum of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (d).
3.2. SEM and TEM Pd/C catalysts contain about 20.0 wt% of Pd, illustrating that almost
all the PdCl2 has been reduced.
SEM and TEM images for the prepared materials are shown in The HRTEM images of NiO/MgO@C are shown in Fig. 4 and cor-
Figs. 2 and 3. Fig. 2(a)–(c) shows the SEM images of NiO/MgO at dif- roborate the morphologies observed in the SEM/HRSEM images in
ferent magnifications. The core–shell morphology is clearly distinct Fig. 2. The core/shell structure is clearly visible in the TEM pictures
in the product. The obtained EDAX (Fig. 2(d)) analysis confirmed the (Fig. 4(a)–(c)). The nearly spherical nanocrystals are agglomerated
presence of C, Ni, Mg and O elements in the synthesized compos- within the carbon shell (Fig. 4(a)). The dimensions of the nanocrys-
ites. The calculated atomic ratio of MgO (0.071):NiO (0.069) from tal core are estimated to be 20 ± 5 nm. The size of the C shell
EDAX is more or less 1:1, which is comparable to the precursors observed in Fig. 4(c) is 5.0 nm. Fig. 4(a)–(c) presents the HRTEM
ratio. The SEM and TEM images of the Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts images of a nanocrystalline NiO/MgO@C composite. It illustrates
are shown in Fig. 3(a)–(c). The SEM image (Fig. 3(a)) shows that the the well-defined lattice fringes, indicating the high crystalline
Pd nanoparticles are dispersed above the NiO/MgO@C core/shell nature of the materials. The measured inter-planar spacing “d”
structures. value is 2.09 Å, which corresponds to the lattice plane of (2 0 0)
Because of the lower magnification, the shape and size of the with the face-cantered cubic phase of the NiO–MgO material.
Pd particles cannot be not clearly seen. The TEM images (Fig. 3(b) These values are in agreement with the reported JCPDS value of
and (c)) of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts show that the materials con- d200 = 2.12 Å (JCPDS No. 024-0712 of NiO/MgO). The selected area
tain rod- and film-shaped Pd particles deposited on the core–shell electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 4(d)) shows the formation
structure of NiO/MgO@C. The measurements of the energy disper- of ring patterns, which infer the polycrystalline characteristic of the
sive spectra of Pd (NiO/MgO@C) catalysts indicated that both the materials.
344 C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347
Fig. 3. SEM images of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) core/shell structure (a), TEM images of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) (b and c) and EDAX spectrum of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) core/shell structure (d).
3.3. Raman spectra forward peak potential (Ef ), the backward peak potential (Eb ), and
the forward peak current intensity (If ) expressed in mA cm−2 , are
Fig. 5(a) and (b) shows the room-temperature Raman spec- shown in Table 1. The Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) catalyst showed a bet-
tra of the products, where the bands in 100–1300 cm−1 and ter activity for ethanol oxidation than Pd/C. The onset potential
1200–1700 cm−1 corresponding to the spectral regions of the for the ethanol oxidation reaction on a Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electro-
NiO/MgO core and carbon shell, respectively. The Raman spec- catalyst was 200 mV more negative in comparison to that of a
tra of the synthesized NiO/MgO@C (Fig. 5(a)) show peaks at 530, Pd/C electro-catalyst. Values for Pd–NiO/C, similar to those of
720, 880 and 1080 cm−1 , while the literature values of the Raman Pd–NiO/MgO@C, were previously reported [50]. It is clear that
bands of NiO/MgO are 490, 720, 860, 980 and 1050 cm−1 [54,55]. the involvement of metal oxides significantly increased the cat-
The observed peaks of the NiO–MgO@C core/shell are shifted to alytic activity at the same Pd loadings. The peak current density
the red, or unchanged, when compared to commercial NiO/MgO for ethanol oxidation, 69.3 mA cm−2 for the Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) cat-
(Fig. 5(a)). This may be due the interaction between NiO and MgO alyst, was higher than on the Pd/C electrode (47.8 mA cm−2 ). The
when they are mixed together. The Raman spectrum in the region forward peak potential for the electro-oxidation of ethanol on the
1100–1700 cm−1 is characteristic of graphitic and disordered car- Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrode was −0.17 V (vs. Hg/HgO), lower than
bon [56]. The Raman peaks at 1330 and 1600 cm−1 are the D- and −0.03 V (vs. Hg/HgO) for the Pd/C catalyst. The high peak oxidation
G-bands (Fig. 5(b)). The D-band is attributed to the Raman-inactive current and low anodic peak potential show that Pd/(NiO/MgO@C)
A1g vibration mode assigned to the vibrations of carbon atoms electrocatalysts were more active than the Pd/C electrode. More-
with dangling bonds in planar terminations of disordered graphite over, the higher catalytic currents at more negative potentials on
[57]. The G-band is the Raman active optical mode, E2g , of two- Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrocatalysts could potentially improve DEFC
dimensional graphite, and which is closely related to the vibrations efficiency.
in sp2 -bonded carbon atoms [58]. Fig. 7 shows the current density–time curves measured at a con-
stant potential of −0.2 V. The current density of ethanol oxidation
3.4. Electrochemical ethanol oxidation for the Pd–NiO/MgO@C composite catalyst was higher than that for
the Pd/C catalyst, as found above in the cyclic voltammetry tests.
The Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalyst performance for the electrocat- After polarization for 60 min, Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) and Pd/C catalysts
alytic oxidation of 1 M of ethanol in 1 M of KOH was evaluated reached their steady-state current densities of 33 and 25 mA cm−2
by cyclic voltammetry (Fig. 6) at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 . The at a potential of −0.2 V, respectively. The data indicate that the
following parameters, including the onset potential (Eonset ), the Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) composite catalyst has a higher catalytic activity
C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347 345
Fig. 4. HRTEM images of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (a–c), SAED patterns of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (d).
for ethanol oxidation than the Pd/C catalyst, owing to the addition acetate, and even for nickel and cobalt acetates. On the other hand,
of a core shell structure and oxide. when the decomposition of the acetates of strong metals (stan-
dard reduction potential <−0.3 V) such as zinc and iron is conducted
3.5. Formation mechanism of NiO/MgO@C core–shell under the autogenic pressure, the core that is obtained is composed
nanocomposites of their oxides. To obtain the metallic core for these strong met-
als, the decomposition of the alkyl-metal compound is conducted
The decomposition of metal acetates and metal acetylacetonates under their autogenic pressure, and metallic cores (zinc, cadmium,
under their autogenic pressure at elevated temperatures yielded and aluminum) surrounded by a carbon shell are obtained. In the
two different products, depending on the nature of the metal. The current case, magnesium as a strong metal would yield MgO as the
decomposition of the acetates of noble metals, or metals having a core, but it is surprising to find nickel oxide as its partner, and not
positive reduction potential, yields the metal as a core and carbon metallic nickel. It is suggested that the MgO aids (catalyzes) the
as the shell. These results were obtained for silver acetate, copper oxidation of the nickel. It is also possible that since the reaction is
Table 1
Comparison of activity of ethanol oxidation between Pd/C and Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrodes.
4. Conclusion
80 [1] P.D. Cozzoli, T. Pellegrino, L. Manna, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 119.
[2] Y.W. Jun, J.S. Choi, J.W. Cheon, Y.W. Jun, J.S. Choi, J. Cheon, Chem. Commun. 121
(a) Pd/NiO-MgO@C (2007) 203.
(a) [3] H.W. Gu, M. Yang, J.H. Gao, C.K. Chang, B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 34.
(b) Pd/C
[4] F. Caruso, Adv. Mater. 13 (2001) 11.
60
Current density (mA/cm 2)
[5] A.H. Lu, E.L. Salabas, F. Schuth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 1222.
[6] L.M. Liz-Marzaı̌ n, P. Mulvaney, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 7312.
(b) [7] Y.D. Yin, Y. Lu, Y.G. Sun, Y.N. Xia, Nano Lett. 2 (2002) 427.
[8] F. Caruso, R.A. Caruso, H. Mohwald, Science 282 (1998) 1111.
40 [9] S.R. Hall, S.A. Davis, S. Mann, Langmuir 16 (2000) 1454.
[10] O. Palchik, G. Kataby, Y. Mastai, A. Gedanken, Adv. Mater. 11 (1999) 1289.
[11] J. Jang, B. Lim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 42 (2003) 5600.
[12] Z.H. Wang, C.J. Choi, B.K. Kim, J.C. Kim, Z.D. Zhang, Carbon 41 (9) (2003) 1751.
20 [13] R.S. Ruoff, D.C. Lorents, B. Chan, R. Malhotra, S. Subramoney, Science 259 (5093)
(1993) 346.
[14] E. Donath, G.B. Sukhorukov, F. Caruso, S.A. Davis, H. Mo¨hwald, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 37 (16) (1998) 2201.
0 [15] I. Gill, A. Ballesteros, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (34) (1998) 8587.
[16] S. Decker, K.J. Klabunde, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 12465.
[17] C.L. Carnes, K.J. Klabunde, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 1806.
[18] Y. Kawaguchi, Solid State Commun. 117 (2000) 17.
[19] S.H.C. Liang, I.D. Gay, J. Catal. 101 (1986) 293.
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 [20] A.N. Copp, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 74 (1995) 135.
Potential (V) Vs Hg/HgO [21] B. Sheela, H. Gomathi, G.P. Rao, J. Electroanal. Chem. 394 (1995) 267.
[22] M. Yoshio, Y. Todorov, K. Yamato, H. Noguchi, J. Itoh, M. Okada, T. Mouri, J.
Power Sources 74 (1998) 46.
Fig. 6. Cyclic voltammograms for ethanol electro-oxidation on (a) Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) [23] R.C. Makkus, K. Hemmes, J.H.W.D. Wir, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (1994) 3429.
and (b) Pd/C in 1 M KOH/1 M ETOH solution, at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 (recorded [24] E.R. Beach, S. Krenar, S.E. Brown, S.J. Rozeveld, P.A. Morris, Mater. Chem. Phys.
after 20 scans), 25 ◦ C. 115 (2009) 371.
[25] K. Oka, T. Yanagida, K. Nagashima, H. Tanaka, T. Kawai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131
(2009) 3434.
70 [26] E. Liu, W. Li, J. Li, X. Meng, R. Ding, S. Tan, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 1122.
[27] M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, F. Davar, Polyhedron 28 (2009) 1111.
[28] V. Plank, H.J. Snaith, C. Ducati, J.S. Bendal, L. Schmidt-Mende, M.E. Welland,
(a) Pd/NiO-MgO@C Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 465603.
60 (b) Pd/C [29] K.H. Woo, W.L. Jong, H.S. Seung, J. Phy, Chem. Solids 69 (2008) 1491.
[30] Y.J. Zeng, Z.Z. Ye, F. Liu, D.Y. Li, Y.F. Lu, W. Jaeger, H.P. He, L.P. Zhu, J.Y. Huang,
Current density (mA/cm )
2
[49] F.P. Hu, C.L. Chen, Z.Y. Wang, G.Y. Wei, P.K. Shen, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2006) [54] E. Cazzanelli1, A. Kuzmin, G. Mariotto, N. Mironova-Ulmane, J. Phys. Condens.
1087. Matter 15 (2003) 2045.
[50] C. Xu, P.K. Shen, Y.L. Liu, J. Power Sources 164 (2007) 527. [55] N.B. Manson, W. Von der ohe, S.L. Chodos, Phys. Rev. B 3 (1971) 1698.
[51] C. Xu, P.K. Shen, X.H. Ji, R. Zeng, Y.L. Liu, Electrochem. Commun. 7 (2005) 1305. [56] V.G. Pol, S.V. Pol, N. Perkas, A. Gedanken, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 134.
[52] F. Hu, F. Ding, S. Song, P.K. Shen, J. Power Sources 163 (2006) 415. [57] N. Shimodaira, A. Masui, J. Appl. Phys. 92 (2002) 902.
[53] D. Chu, J. Wang, S. Wang, L. Zha, J. He, Y. Hou, Y. Yan, H. Lin, Z. Tian, Catal. [58] V. Barbarossa, F. Galluzzi, R. Tomaciello, A. Zanobi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 185 (1991)
Commun. 10 (2008) 955. 53.