You are on page 1of 7

Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Materials Chemistry and Physics


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matchemphys

Synthesis of a carbon-coated NiO/MgO core/shell nanocomposite as a Pd


electro-catalyst support for ethanol oxidation
C. Mahendiran a , T. Maiyalagan b , K. Scott b , A. Gedanken a,∗
a
Department of Chemistry and Kanbar Laboratory for Nanomaterials at the Bar-Ilan University Center for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Bar-Ilan University,
Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
b
School of Chemical Engineering & Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Carbon coated on NiO/MgO in a core/shell nanostructure was synthesized by the single-step RAPET
Received 2 June 2010 (reaction under autogenic pressure at elevated temperatures) technique, and the obtained formation
Received in revised form 13 February 2011 mechanism of the core/shell nanocomposite was presented. The carbon-coated NiO/MgO and its sup-
Accepted 16 February 2011
ported Pd catalyst, Pd/(NiO/MgO@C), were characterized by SEM, HR-TEM, XRD and cyclic voltammetry.
The X-ray diffraction patterns confirmed the face-centered cubic crystal structure of NiO/MgO. Raman
Keywords:
spectroscopy measurements provided structural evidence for the formation of a NiO/MgO compos-
Core–shell structure
ite and the nature of the coated carbon shell. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
Nanoparticles
Ethanol oxidation
images showed the core and shell morphologies individually. The electrocatalytic properties of the
Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalyst for ethanol oxidation were investigated in an alkaline solution. The results
indicated that the prepared Pd–NiO/MgO@C catalyst has excellent electrocatalytic activity and stability.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction lutants, such as SO2 and H2 S [16,17]. Magnesium oxide (MgO)


is a typical wideband-gap insulator. It has found many impor-
Recently, the focus on the chemical synthesis of nanoparti- tant applications for use in catalysis, refractory materials, toxic
cles has shifted from single component nanoparticles to hybrid waste remediation, paint, superconductors, and substrates for thin
nanoparticles. Hybrid nanoparticles usually contain two or more film growth [18–20]. NiO is a very successful material used in
different nanoscale domains, which lead to synergistic properties various fields, such as catalysis [21], battery cathodes [22] and
due to their interfacial interactions. Therefore, hybrid nanoparticles fuel cell electrodes [23], and it is also widely studied as an ant
(non-symmetrical dimmers, symmetric core–shell and any other ferromagnetic as it is a chemically-stable ionic insulator with
hetero-structures) are promising due to their multi-function and high thermal stability and good resistance to corrosion. Many
designable properties [1–3]. The design of core/shell structured researchers have prepared NiO and MgO nanomaterials by various
composites has received much attention as a means to improve methods, e.g., the solvo-thermal technique [24], the laser technique
the stability and surface chemistry of the core materials, and as a [25], the sol–gel method [26] and thermal decomposition [27]. The
way of obtaining unique structures, properties, and applications via preparation of core–shell nano-wire structures of ZnO/MgO [28]
a combination of the different characteristics of the components obtained by hydrothermal, atomic layer deposition [29] and chemi-
that are not available with their single-component counterparts cal vapor deposition (CVD) [30] methods has already been reported.
[4–7]. The synthesis and characterization of hybrid nanostructure NiO/MgO thin films were prepared by an ion beam-assisted depo-
material is aimed at designing and arranging nanomaterials in com- sition technique and were used for chemical transformations and
plex functional structures, resulting in unique physical properties catalysis applications [31].
[8–11]. Direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFs) have attracted much attention
Carbon-coated nanomaterials are of great interest due to their because ethanol has a low toxicity, as compared to the methanol
stability towards oxidation and degradation [12–15]. The creation used in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFs). Ethanol can be easily pro-
of core/shell nanostructures containing bi-metal oxides has greatly duced in great quantities by the fermentation of sugar-containing
enhanced the efficiency of these structures over pure single metal raw materials [32]. Pt-based catalysts are extensively studied for
oxide particles as destructive adsorbents for environmental pol- electrocatalytic fuel cell applications. Indeed, platinum is very effi-
cient for the different reactions involved in fuel cells, such as
methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction [33]. However, it is well
∗ Corresponding author. known that the anode activity of Pt is adversely affected by poison-
E-mail address: gedanken@mail.biu.ac.il (A. Gedanken). ing from CO species. Several studies have investigated the addition

0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.02.067
342 C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347

of Ru or other metals to Pt, in order to improve the activity of the


catalysts [34–36]. Nevertheless, it has been shown recently that
palladium is more active than platinum for ethanol oxidation in
basic media [37–39]. As Pd is 50 times more abundant in the earth
and cheaper than Pt, Pd-based nanomaterials are potential elec-
trocatalysts for replacing Pt in DAFCs. Palladium also plays a vital
role in catalysis and is involved in various reactions, such as Heck,
Suzuki, and Stille coupling [40–43]. In order to reduce the amount
of noble-metal loading on the electrodes, improvements to the dis-
persion of the noble metal on the support have been investigated.
Metal nanoparticles have been dispersed on a wide variety of sub-
strates, such as carbon nanomaterials [44,45], polymer matrices
[46], and oxide matrices [47,48]. Recently, metal oxides such as
CeO2 [49], NiO [50], MgO [51], TiO2 [52] and In2 O3 [53] have been
used as electrocatalysts for the direct oxidation of alcohol, and
which resulted in a significantly improved electrode performance
in terms of the enhanced reaction activity. The noble-metal shell
in the core/shell nanoparticles has two roles. First, it protects the
non-noble core from contact with the alkaline electrolyte. Second,
the coated Pd on the shell should improve the catalytic properties Fig. 1. XRD of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (a) and Pd–NiO/MgO@C (b).
of the substrate. We therefore report herein on a one-stage, repro-
ducible, solvent free, competent, and straightforward approach for
the synthesis of NiO/MgO@C core shell nanostructures, followed 2.4. Preparation of the working electrode
by its decoration by Pd using simple impregnation. The prepared
Glassy carbon (GC) (Bas Electrode, 0.07 cm2 ) was polished to a mirror finish
material was evaluated for the electrochemical ethanol oxidation with 0.05 ␮m alumina suspensions before each experiment and served as an under-
reaction for fuel cell applications in alkaline media. lying substrate of the working electrode. The working electrodes were fabricated
by coating Nafion-impregnated catalyst ink on a glassy carbon electrode. Thin-film
electrodes were prepared by dispersing 35 mg of the catalyst in 800 ␮L of deion-
2. Experimental ized water. 200 ␮L of a 5 wt% Nafion solution was then added and ultrasonicated
for 20 min. A known amount of the suspension was added to the glassy carbon
2.1. Synthesis of a NiO/MgO@C core/shell nanocomposite (GC) electrode and slowly dried in air. The loading of the noble metal catalyst was
0.3 mg cm−2 . A solution of 1 M of KOH containing 1 M of ethanol was used to study
The synthesis of a NiO–MgO@C core/shell nanocomposite was carried out by the activity of ethanol oxidation.
the thermal dissociation of a mixture of nickel acetate (Ni(C4 H6 O2 )2 ) and magne-
sium acetylacetonate (Mg(C5 H7 O2 )2 ), purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as 2.5. Electrochemical measurements
received. The 3 mL closed vessel cell was assembled from stainless steel Swagelok
parts. A 1/2 union part was plugged from both sides by standard caps. In a typical Electrochemical measurements were collected using a computer-controlled Gill
synthesis of NiO/MgO@C core/shell material, 0.248 g of nickel acetate (0.072 mols) AC potentiostat (ACM Instruments Ltd., Cumbria, UK). All experiments were car-
and 0.516 g of magnesium acetylacetonate (0.072 mol) were introduced into the cell ried out in a glass cell using a traditional three-electrode assembly incorporating
at room temperature. The filled cell was closed tightly by the other plug and then a glassy carbon working electrode (0.07 cm2 ), a mercury–mercury oxide reference
placed inside an iron pipe at the center of the tubular furnace. The temperature electrode, and a platinum mesh (25 mm × 25 mm) counter electrode. All electro-
was raised at a rate of 10 ◦ C min−1 . The closed vessel cell was heated at 600 ◦ C for chemical experiments were carried out at room temperature in 1 M of aqueous KOH.
3 h. The reaction took place at the autogenic pressure of the precursor. The closed The electrolyte solution was purged with high pure nitrogen for 30 min prior to a
cell (Swagelok) was gradually cooled (∼5 h) to room temperature and opened. In series of voltammetric experiments. The current densities reported are based on the
fact, we expected to obtain 0.764 g of NiO/MgO@C for a 100% product yield, but geometric area. Triply-distilled water was used throughout for the preparation of
during the chemical reaction inside the Swagelok some of the acetate molecules solutions.
might have evaporated at the higher temperature. Thus, we achieved only 0.519 g
(∼68%) of black-colored NiO/MgO@C. The synthesis was repeated five times in order
to confirm the reproducibility of the process, and identical products were obtained. 3. Results and discussion

3.1. XRD
2.2. Preparation of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts

3.13 mL of 0.045 mol L−1 PdCl2 were dissolved in 10 mL of ultrapure water and
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-prepared
60 mg of NiO/MgO@C was added. The solution was mixed by magnetic stirring for 3 h NiO/MgO@C core/shell nanocomposites is shown in Fig. 1(a). Sharp
and ultrasonicated to achieve 20% Pd loading. A freshly prepared aqueous solution and well-defined peaks are observed at 2 values of 36.95, 42.91,
of NaBH4 was added drop wise under N2 atmosphere to the solution to reduce the Pd 62.64, 75.00, and 79.00◦ corresponding to planes of (1 1 1), (2 0 0),
species to form the electrocatalyst, which was then repeatedly washed with distilled
(2 2 0), (3 1 1) and (2 2 2), respectively, according to JCPDS No.
water to remove residual salts, centrifuged, and dried at 70 ◦ C.
024-0712 of NiO/MgO. All these peaks could be indexed to a face-
centered cubic structure with a lattice constant of a = 4.192A◦ of
2.3. Structural characterizations NiO/MgO. The obtained lattice constants matched well with the
JCPDS values of the bulk materials of the NiO/MgO. Due to their very
XRD patterns were collected using a Bruker AXS D* Advance Powder X-ray similar structure, not much difference is observed in the XRD pat-
diffractometer (Cu KR radiation, wavelength 1.5406 Å). High-resolution scanning
electron microscopy (HRSEM) measurements of the products were carried out on
terns of NiO and NiO/MgO. Therefore, the formation of NiO/MgO can
a JEOL-JSM 840 scanning electron microscope operating at 20 and 30 kV. The mor- be identified using the above diffraction peaks. Fig. 1(b) shows the
phologies and nanostructure were further characterized with a JEM-1200EX TEM XRD patterns of the Pd doped on the NiO/MgO@C core/shell struc-
model and a JEOL-2010 HR-TEM model using an accelerating voltage of 80 and ture. The strong diffraction peaks observed at 2 values of 40.10◦ ,
200 kV, respectively. SAEDS (selected area energy dispersive X-ray analysis) of one
46.49◦ and 68.08◦ , correspond to the (1 1 1), (2 0 0) and (2 2 0) facets
individual particle was conducted using a JEOL-2010 HR-TEM model. The Olympus
BX41 (Jobin Yvon Horiba) Raman spectrometer was employed, using the 514.5 nm of Pd nanocrystals. The application of the Debye–Scherrer formula
line of an Ar laser as the excitation source to analyze the nature of the carbon present to the strongest diffraction peaks for Pd at 39.9◦ gives a crystallite
around the core particle. size of 12.0 nm.
C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347 343

Fig. 2. SEM images of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (a–c), EDAX spectrum of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (d).

3.2. SEM and TEM Pd/C catalysts contain about 20.0 wt% of Pd, illustrating that almost
all the PdCl2 has been reduced.
SEM and TEM images for the prepared materials are shown in The HRTEM images of NiO/MgO@C are shown in Fig. 4 and cor-
Figs. 2 and 3. Fig. 2(a)–(c) shows the SEM images of NiO/MgO at dif- roborate the morphologies observed in the SEM/HRSEM images in
ferent magnifications. The core–shell morphology is clearly distinct Fig. 2. The core/shell structure is clearly visible in the TEM pictures
in the product. The obtained EDAX (Fig. 2(d)) analysis confirmed the (Fig. 4(a)–(c)). The nearly spherical nanocrystals are agglomerated
presence of C, Ni, Mg and O elements in the synthesized compos- within the carbon shell (Fig. 4(a)). The dimensions of the nanocrys-
ites. The calculated atomic ratio of MgO (0.071):NiO (0.069) from tal core are estimated to be 20 ± 5 nm. The size of the C shell
EDAX is more or less 1:1, which is comparable to the precursors observed in Fig. 4(c) is 5.0 nm. Fig. 4(a)–(c) presents the HRTEM
ratio. The SEM and TEM images of the Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts images of a nanocrystalline NiO/MgO@C composite. It illustrates
are shown in Fig. 3(a)–(c). The SEM image (Fig. 3(a)) shows that the the well-defined lattice fringes, indicating the high crystalline
Pd nanoparticles are dispersed above the NiO/MgO@C core/shell nature of the materials. The measured inter-planar spacing “d”
structures. value is 2.09 Å, which corresponds to the lattice plane of (2 0 0)
Because of the lower magnification, the shape and size of the with the face-cantered cubic phase of the NiO–MgO material.
Pd particles cannot be not clearly seen. The TEM images (Fig. 3(b) These values are in agreement with the reported JCPDS value of
and (c)) of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalysts show that the materials con- d200 = 2.12 Å (JCPDS No. 024-0712 of NiO/MgO). The selected area
tain rod- and film-shaped Pd particles deposited on the core–shell electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 4(d)) shows the formation
structure of NiO/MgO@C. The measurements of the energy disper- of ring patterns, which infer the polycrystalline characteristic of the
sive spectra of Pd (NiO/MgO@C) catalysts indicated that both the materials.
344 C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347

Fig. 3. SEM images of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) core/shell structure (a), TEM images of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) (b and c) and EDAX spectrum of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) core/shell structure (d).

3.3. Raman spectra forward peak potential (Ef ), the backward peak potential (Eb ), and
the forward peak current intensity (If ) expressed in mA cm−2 , are
Fig. 5(a) and (b) shows the room-temperature Raman spec- shown in Table 1. The Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) catalyst showed a bet-
tra of the products, where the bands in 100–1300 cm−1 and ter activity for ethanol oxidation than Pd/C. The onset potential
1200–1700 cm−1 corresponding to the spectral regions of the for the ethanol oxidation reaction on a Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electro-
NiO/MgO core and carbon shell, respectively. The Raman spec- catalyst was 200 mV more negative in comparison to that of a
tra of the synthesized NiO/MgO@C (Fig. 5(a)) show peaks at 530, Pd/C electro-catalyst. Values for Pd–NiO/C, similar to those of
720, 880 and 1080 cm−1 , while the literature values of the Raman Pd–NiO/MgO@C, were previously reported [50]. It is clear that
bands of NiO/MgO are 490, 720, 860, 980 and 1050 cm−1 [54,55]. the involvement of metal oxides significantly increased the cat-
The observed peaks of the NiO–MgO@C core/shell are shifted to alytic activity at the same Pd loadings. The peak current density
the red, or unchanged, when compared to commercial NiO/MgO for ethanol oxidation, 69.3 mA cm−2 for the Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) cat-
(Fig. 5(a)). This may be due the interaction between NiO and MgO alyst, was higher than on the Pd/C electrode (47.8 mA cm−2 ). The
when they are mixed together. The Raman spectrum in the region forward peak potential for the electro-oxidation of ethanol on the
1100–1700 cm−1 is characteristic of graphitic and disordered car- Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrode was −0.17 V (vs. Hg/HgO), lower than
bon [56]. The Raman peaks at 1330 and 1600 cm−1 are the D- and −0.03 V (vs. Hg/HgO) for the Pd/C catalyst. The high peak oxidation
G-bands (Fig. 5(b)). The D-band is attributed to the Raman-inactive current and low anodic peak potential show that Pd/(NiO/MgO@C)
A1g vibration mode assigned to the vibrations of carbon atoms electrocatalysts were more active than the Pd/C electrode. More-
with dangling bonds in planar terminations of disordered graphite over, the higher catalytic currents at more negative potentials on
[57]. The G-band is the Raman active optical mode, E2g , of two- Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrocatalysts could potentially improve DEFC
dimensional graphite, and which is closely related to the vibrations efficiency.
in sp2 -bonded carbon atoms [58]. Fig. 7 shows the current density–time curves measured at a con-
stant potential of −0.2 V. The current density of ethanol oxidation
3.4. Electrochemical ethanol oxidation for the Pd–NiO/MgO@C composite catalyst was higher than that for
the Pd/C catalyst, as found above in the cyclic voltammetry tests.
The Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) catalyst performance for the electrocat- After polarization for 60 min, Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) and Pd/C catalysts
alytic oxidation of 1 M of ethanol in 1 M of KOH was evaluated reached their steady-state current densities of 33 and 25 mA cm−2
by cyclic voltammetry (Fig. 6) at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 . The at a potential of −0.2 V, respectively. The data indicate that the
following parameters, including the onset potential (Eonset ), the Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) composite catalyst has a higher catalytic activity
C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347 345

Fig. 4. HRTEM images of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (a–c), SAED patterns of NiO/MgO@C core/shell structure (d).

for ethanol oxidation than the Pd/C catalyst, owing to the addition acetate, and even for nickel and cobalt acetates. On the other hand,
of a core shell structure and oxide. when the decomposition of the acetates of strong metals (stan-
dard reduction potential <−0.3 V) such as zinc and iron is conducted
3.5. Formation mechanism of NiO/MgO@C core–shell under the autogenic pressure, the core that is obtained is composed
nanocomposites of their oxides. To obtain the metallic core for these strong met-
als, the decomposition of the alkyl-metal compound is conducted
The decomposition of metal acetates and metal acetylacetonates under their autogenic pressure, and metallic cores (zinc, cadmium,
under their autogenic pressure at elevated temperatures yielded and aluminum) surrounded by a carbon shell are obtained. In the
two different products, depending on the nature of the metal. The current case, magnesium as a strong metal would yield MgO as the
decomposition of the acetates of noble metals, or metals having a core, but it is surprising to find nickel oxide as its partner, and not
positive reduction potential, yields the metal as a core and carbon metallic nickel. It is suggested that the MgO aids (catalyzes) the
as the shell. These results were obtained for silver acetate, copper oxidation of the nickel. It is also possible that since the reaction is

Table 1
Comparison of activity of ethanol oxidation between Pd/C and Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) electrodes.

S. no. Electrode Onset potential (V) Activitya

Forward sweep Reverse sweep

If (mA cm−2 ) Ef (V) Ib (mA cm−2 ) Eb (V)

1 Pd/C −0.5 47.8 −0.03 72.5 −0.14


2 Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) −0.7 69.3 −0.13 52.9 −0.2
3 Pd–NiO(6:1)/Cb −0.62 95 −0.08 – –
4 Pt–MgO(4:1)/Cc −0.58 51 – – –
a
Activity evaluated from cyclic voltammogram in 1 M KOH/1 M ETOH.
b
From Ref. [50].
c
From Ref. [51].
346 C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347

carried out at a lower temperature (600 ◦ C instead of 700 ◦ C), the


carbon cannot reduce the nickel oxide to metallic nickel.

4. Conclusion

Carbon-coated NiO/MgO core/shell nanostructures were syn-


thesized by the single-step RAPET technique. For electrochemical
ethanol oxidation, a Pd electrocatalyst was doped on NiO/MgO@C
by a simple reduction method. XRD and Raman spectral studies of
the as-prepared samples confirmed the formation of NiO/MgO@C,
whereas TEM studies revealed a spherical shape NiO/MgO@C
core/shell structure. The high order crystallinity of these materials
has been confirmed by HRTEM images. The electrocatalytic prop-
erties of Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) composites for ethanol oxidation were
investigated in an alkaline solution. Electrocatalytic studies show
that the prepared Pd/(NiO/MgO@C) composites have an excellent
electrocatalytic activity and stability in alkaline media.

Fig. 5. Raman spectra of NiO/MgO@C core (a) and C-shell (b).


References

80 [1] P.D. Cozzoli, T. Pellegrino, L. Manna, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 119.
[2] Y.W. Jun, J.S. Choi, J.W. Cheon, Y.W. Jun, J.S. Choi, J. Cheon, Chem. Commun. 121
(a) Pd/NiO-MgO@C (2007) 203.
(a) [3] H.W. Gu, M. Yang, J.H. Gao, C.K. Chang, B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 34.
(b) Pd/C
[4] F. Caruso, Adv. Mater. 13 (2001) 11.
60
Current density (mA/cm 2)

[5] A.H. Lu, E.L. Salabas, F. Schuth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 1222.
[6] L.M. Liz-Marzaı̌ n, P. Mulvaney, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 7312.
(b) [7] Y.D. Yin, Y. Lu, Y.G. Sun, Y.N. Xia, Nano Lett. 2 (2002) 427.
[8] F. Caruso, R.A. Caruso, H. Mohwald, Science 282 (1998) 1111.
40 [9] S.R. Hall, S.A. Davis, S. Mann, Langmuir 16 (2000) 1454.
[10] O. Palchik, G. Kataby, Y. Mastai, A. Gedanken, Adv. Mater. 11 (1999) 1289.
[11] J. Jang, B. Lim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 42 (2003) 5600.
[12] Z.H. Wang, C.J. Choi, B.K. Kim, J.C. Kim, Z.D. Zhang, Carbon 41 (9) (2003) 1751.
20 [13] R.S. Ruoff, D.C. Lorents, B. Chan, R. Malhotra, S. Subramoney, Science 259 (5093)
(1993) 346.
[14] E. Donath, G.B. Sukhorukov, F. Caruso, S.A. Davis, H. Mo¨hwald, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 37 (16) (1998) 2201.
0 [15] I. Gill, A. Ballesteros, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (34) (1998) 8587.
[16] S. Decker, K.J. Klabunde, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 12465.
[17] C.L. Carnes, K.J. Klabunde, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 1806.
[18] Y. Kawaguchi, Solid State Commun. 117 (2000) 17.
[19] S.H.C. Liang, I.D. Gay, J. Catal. 101 (1986) 293.
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 [20] A.N. Copp, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 74 (1995) 135.
Potential (V) Vs Hg/HgO [21] B. Sheela, H. Gomathi, G.P. Rao, J. Electroanal. Chem. 394 (1995) 267.
[22] M. Yoshio, Y. Todorov, K. Yamato, H. Noguchi, J. Itoh, M. Okada, T. Mouri, J.
Power Sources 74 (1998) 46.
Fig. 6. Cyclic voltammograms for ethanol electro-oxidation on (a) Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) [23] R.C. Makkus, K. Hemmes, J.H.W.D. Wir, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (1994) 3429.
and (b) Pd/C in 1 M KOH/1 M ETOH solution, at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 (recorded [24] E.R. Beach, S. Krenar, S.E. Brown, S.J. Rozeveld, P.A. Morris, Mater. Chem. Phys.
after 20 scans), 25 ◦ C. 115 (2009) 371.
[25] K. Oka, T. Yanagida, K. Nagashima, H. Tanaka, T. Kawai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131
(2009) 3434.
70 [26] E. Liu, W. Li, J. Li, X. Meng, R. Ding, S. Tan, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 1122.
[27] M. Salavati-Niasari, N. Mir, F. Davar, Polyhedron 28 (2009) 1111.
[28] V. Plank, H.J. Snaith, C. Ducati, J.S. Bendal, L. Schmidt-Mende, M.E. Welland,
(a) Pd/NiO-MgO@C Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 465603.
60 (b) Pd/C [29] K.H. Woo, W.L. Jong, H.S. Seung, J. Phy, Chem. Solids 69 (2008) 1491.
[30] Y.J. Zeng, Z.Z. Ye, F. Liu, D.Y. Li, Y.F. Lu, W. Jaeger, H.P. He, L.P. Zhu, J.Y. Huang,
Current density (mA/cm )
2

B.H. Zhao, Cryst. Growth Des. 9 (2009) 263.


50 [31] A. Nakao, Y. Tanaka, A. Ide-Ektessabi, Surf. Coatings Technol. 203 (2009) 2731.
[32] S.Q. Song, P. Tsiakaras, Appl. Catal. B 63 (2006) 187.
[33] A.S. Arico, S. Srinavasan, V. Antonucci, Fuel Cells 1 (2001) 133.
40 [34] B. Grgur, N. Markovic, P.N. Ross, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998) 3631.
[35] M. Gotz, H. Wendt, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998) 3637.
[36] J. Bett, H. Kunz, A. Aldykiewicz, J. Fenton, W. Bailey, D. McGrath, Electrochim.
Acta 43 (1998) 3645.
30 [37] S.S. Gupta, J. Datta, J. Power Sources 145 (2005) 124.
(a) [38] J. Liu, J. Ye, C. Xu, S.P. Jiang, Y. Tong, Electrochem. Commun. 9 (2007) 2334.
[39] C. Xu, H. Wang, P.K. Shen, S.P. Jiang, Adv. Mater. 19 (2007) 4256.
(b)
20 [40] M.T. Reetz, E. Westermann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 165.
[41] D. Astruc, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 1884.
[42] R. Franzen, Can. J. Chem. 78 (2000) 957.
10 [43] Y. Li, X.M. Hong, D.M. Collard, M.A. El-Sayed, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 2385.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 [44] T. Maiyalagan, B. Viswanathan, U.V. Varadaraju, Electrochem. Commun. 7
(2005) 905.
Time (seconds) [45] T. Maiyalagan, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 89 (2008) 286.
[46] T. Maiyalagan, J. Power Sources 179 (2008) 443.
Fig. 7. Current density–time curves at −0.2 V for 3600 s (a) Pd/(NiO–MgO@C) and [47] T. Maiyalagan, B. Viswanathan, J. Power Sources 175 (2008) 789.
(b) Pd/C in 1 M KOH/1 M ETOH solutions, 25 ◦ C. [48] T. Maiyalagan, B. Viswanathan, U.V. Varadaraju, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6
(2006) 2067.
C. Mahendiran et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 128 (2011) 341–347 347

[49] F.P. Hu, C.L. Chen, Z.Y. Wang, G.Y. Wei, P.K. Shen, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2006) [54] E. Cazzanelli1, A. Kuzmin, G. Mariotto, N. Mironova-Ulmane, J. Phys. Condens.
1087. Matter 15 (2003) 2045.
[50] C. Xu, P.K. Shen, Y.L. Liu, J. Power Sources 164 (2007) 527. [55] N.B. Manson, W. Von der ohe, S.L. Chodos, Phys. Rev. B 3 (1971) 1698.
[51] C. Xu, P.K. Shen, X.H. Ji, R. Zeng, Y.L. Liu, Electrochem. Commun. 7 (2005) 1305. [56] V.G. Pol, S.V. Pol, N. Perkas, A. Gedanken, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 134.
[52] F. Hu, F. Ding, S. Song, P.K. Shen, J. Power Sources 163 (2006) 415. [57] N. Shimodaira, A. Masui, J. Appl. Phys. 92 (2002) 902.
[53] D. Chu, J. Wang, S. Wang, L. Zha, J. He, Y. Hou, Y. Yan, H. Lin, Z. Tian, Catal. [58] V. Barbarossa, F. Galluzzi, R. Tomaciello, A. Zanobi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 185 (1991)
Commun. 10 (2008) 955. 53.

You might also like