Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Driving Innovation
Technology and
innovation centres
Closing the gap between
concept and commercialisation
This programme has huge potential. Together with The strategic plan................... 08
business, research and academia we are creating a vital
resource which will help to drive economic growth by Implementing the plan........ 14
closing the gap between concept and commercialisation
and enhancing innovation in specific technology areas Next steps.......................................21
for years to come.
Getting involved........................21
This document explains how.
The vision
The new network of technology and Technology and innovation centres will They will provide an innovative and
innovation centres will stimulate innovation, provide access to the best technical entrepreneurial environment, enabling
accelerate growth and anchor high value expertise, infrastructure, skills and the development of new value chains
development activity in the UK. It will make equipment – resources which companies, and facilitating a variety of routes to the
world-leading research and technologies particularly small ones, can seldom afford commercialisation of new products,
available in a way that UK businesses can alone. By providing a national focus for joint processes and services. They will have
engage with, in a professional and work between businesses and the research international reach, connecting with other
entrepreneurial environment. Using these base, individual centres will create a critical countries’ centres of business and
technologies and resources, business will mass of activity which will benefit the entire research excellence, and building an
be able to develop new products and sectors in which they operate, and beyond. international reputation which will also
services more rapidly and effectively. help to attract inward investment.
The centres will attract work and
The network will build on the UK’s engagement from a wide cross-section The programme to establish these centres
outstanding research capability, both of industry ranging from multinationals to will transform the resource available for
academic and business, and provide an small businesses, and will have the innovative businesses in the long term,
accelerated path for technologies to move reputation to work closely with the best establish world leading capabilities for the
from concept towards commercialisation. universities and other technology UK and achieve global impact.
organisations in the UK and internationally.
The network of centres is one part of the
They will also act as connectors, sharing
Government’s broader agenda to stimulate
expertise between centres and across
innovation and growth. The Technology
research institutions.
Strategy Board’s 2011-2015 strategic plan,
Concept to Commercialisation features
technology and innovation centres as a
key element but also highlights the many
other approaches and programmes in
place and planned, working with partners
to accelerate and support business
innovation in different ways.
In March 2010, the entrepreneur Hermann In January 2011 the Technology Strategy In early 2011 the House of Commons
Hauser produced an influential report, Board published a prospectus1 which Science and Technology Committee
The Current and Future Role of Technology proposed key principles for the new conducted an enquiry into the prospects
& Innovation Centres in the UK, which network – what the centres should do, for technology and innovation centres,
identified best practice from around the the criteria for choosing their areas of seeking its evidence from many quarters.
world and made a robust case for work, how they should be run and the The resulting report also strongly
long-term UK investment in a network of process for their development. supported the initiative and the thrust of
technology and innovation centres which the proposals in the Technology Strategy
The new plans for physical centres which
would ‘deliver a step change in the UK’s Board’s prospectus, and made some
would focus innovation and pre-commercial
ability to commercialise its research’. The practical recommendations about how the
development caught the imagination of the
rationale for establishing such centres was programme should be taken forward
UK’s researchers and businesses. The
further reinforced by Sir James Dyson in which have made a valuable contribution
prospectus invited views on the areas for
his 2010 report Ingenious Britain. to the development of our plans.
future technology and innovation centres,
In Autumn 2010 the Government and on the proposed management and As the programme develops, the
announced that it would invest over governance arrangements. Over 500 continued involvement of research
£200m in a network of technology and overwhelmingly positive responses were institutions, business, government and
innovation centres over the four-year received, welcoming the proposals and other partners will be vital, both in
spending review period, and that the suggesting a wide range of areas for future establishing the centres and in working
Technology Strategy Board would be investment2. This input from the research with them, to ensure that this major
the agency responsible for creating and and business community has been addition to the innovation infrastructure
overseeing the new facilities. invaluable in complementing our own of the UK will achieve its purpose.
experts’ work to define the strategy for
developing the centres programme.
1 Technology and innovation centres; a prospectus, Technology Strategy Board January 2011, www.innovateuk.org
2 A summary of these responses will be available on our website at www.innovateuk.org
Enhancing the Across the UK there are many examples of To have the right impact centres must be
different geographical groupings and timely – working in the space between
innovation landscape physical clusters of companies and research and the stage where the
research bodies which have an important technology is part of specific business
The new centres will be role to play in innovation. As we examine plans and, for example, venture capital is
an important new element where and in what technology areas to available. They must work in the space
establish a centre, we need to make between concept and commercialisation.
in the UK’s innovation choices that will have the most potential
infrastructure and it is vital Technologies evolve through different
economic impact and be of most benefit
phases and need different approaches
that they complement and to high-growth innovative businesses.
to speed them along – from connecting
enhance the existing The new centres will occupy a distinctive communities around embryonic ideas,
structures and resources. territory. While there may be small clusters through to demonstrator projects to
of businesses with bright ideas in a encourage wider take-up. There are often
We will ensure that they reach out to and particular area, it may be too early in terms very high barriers to the adoption of a
work effectively with existing publicly of technological development to establish technology; for example the need for
funded bodies such as the research a centre in that area. Equally, to justify a long-term investment in capital facilities
councils, universities and national technology and innovation centre, a sector and technical expertise may be well beyond
measurement institutes, and with or technology area even if well developed the funding ability and appetite for risk of
independent research and technology must still demonstrate the potential for businesses, especially SMEs. In such
organisations. The centres will work substantial growth – and for a physical cases, and at the right time, a technology
closely with the other elements of the centre to make a powerful difference to the and innovation centre will provide a
Technology Strategy Board’s innovation pace of innovation. powerful resource to help businesses
investment programme, as well as with develop new products and services based
EU research and innovation support. on the innovative technologies made
available by the centres.
These centres form one part of the Criteria for These criteria form the assessment
Technology Strategy Board’s varied framework for the many possible focus
programme of long-term support for establishing centres areas for these centres. Using our own
innovation in the UK. They will feature in expertise and in consultation with business
the work of relevant innovation An essential part of the and research communities, we examine
platforms, which focus on helping strategy to establish the new what difference the establishment of a
business to address major challenges centre in an area would be expected to
through innovation, and work closely with
network is the adoption of make, including whether alternative
the Knowledge Transfer Networks. the right criteria for assessing methods of support would deliver results
They will complement and work with and prioritising options for more effectively, and whether it is timely
existing research and development to set one up. We also look at whether
programmes, SBRI (the Small Business
the focus of future technology there is a UK business community ready
Research Initiative), demonstrator projects and innovation centres. now to benefit from the work of a centre.
and Knowledge Transfer Partnerships
We have adopted five specific criteria to We will only invest in a technology and
which generate business and academic
guide these decisions: innovation centre when the area is ripe for
collaborations.
such an investment and when this is the
K Are the potential global markets which
As a long-term component of the UK most effective mechanism.
could be accessed through the centre
innovation infrastructure, the new centres
predicted to be worth billions of pounds The Implementing the plan section of this
will need to evolve into complementary
per annum? document outlines the initial priority list of
areas as the technologies mature and the
K Does the UK have world-leading potential candidate areas for technology
needs of business customers shift.
research capability in the area? and innovation centres, following our
assessment.
K Does UK business have the ability to
exploit the technology and make use of Technology and innovation centres are just
increased investment to capture a one element of our long-term support for
significant share of the value chain and innovation across many critical areas in
embed the activity in the UK? the UK. Areas where centres are not the
K Can a proposed centre in this area appropriate or timely solution may still be
enable the UK to attract and anchor the a key target for innovation support through
knowledge-intensive activities of other programmes and mechanisms.
globally mobile companies and secure For more information on the Technology
sustainable wealth creation for the UK? Strategy Board’s wider approach to
K Is a proposed centre closely aligned innovation please see the 2011-2015 strategic
with, and essential to achieve, national plan, Concept to Commercialisation,
strategic priorities? at www.innovateuk.org
Centres will gain their funds from a mix of The Technology Strategy Board will provide
Roles core Technology Strategy Board each centre with core funding under an
A technology and innovation centre will investment, and competitively won agreement with the organisation or body
provide a dynamic environment in which business and public sector funding. running the centre. The agreement will:
multi-disciplinary teams from a diverse The typical funding model, which may K provide sustainable long-term funding
range of backgrounds can work together. vary through the life of the centre, can be generally for a minimum of five years,
expressed in simplified terms one-third, with an expectation of continuing for at
The role of a centre will be to:
one-third, one-third. This means that when least 10 years, subject to continuing
K enhance businesses access to fully established the centres would satisfactory performance and the future
leading-edge technology and expertise generate their funding roughly equally funding environment. This will need to
K reach into the research base for from three sources: be complemented by long-term
world-leading science and engineering K business-funded R&D contracts, business support
K undertake collaborative applied won competitively K define the governance arrangements,
research projects with business K collaborative applied R&D projects, remit and bounds for the centre
K undertake contract research for business funded jointly by the public and private K specify quarterly reporting requirements
K be strongly business-focused with a sectors, also won competitively against agreed metrics and
highly professional delivery ethos K core public funding for long-term performance measures and an annual
investment in infrastructure, expertise performance review
K create a critical mass of activity between
business and research institutions and skills development. K specify aspects such as financial
liabilities, step-in rights if appropriate,
K provide skills development at all levels.
and equipment ownership
K encourage the centres to link with, Governance and management This new programme requires relatively
and draw on the outputs of, the light-touch but effective central
A technology and innovation centre will be management to ensure that the network
research base and other centres
an independent entity, constituted on a of centres achieves its objectives. This will
K define the membership agreement ‘not-for-profit’ basis separately from any include identifying a range of appropriate
for the network of centres covering host organisation or other major partners. measures to track the success of the
branding, networking communications, Each centre will be required to establish a centres over time. To ensure this the
publicity, environmental sustainability business-led Governance Board, Technology Strategy Board will:
and other common aspects composed of business users and experts
K Establish a specific directorate within
K outline the principles for intellectual in the technology to steer the work of the
the Technology Strategy Board, headed
property management centre and oversee its programme of activity.
by a new Executive Director, to handle
K require annual plans to be submitted Centres should have operational its internal management responsibilities
and approved. autonomy within their agreed parameters for setting up and overseeing the
More detailed information on all these and objectives, allowing them to adapt to technology and innovation centres.
topics will be made available to those the changing needs of their customers K Establish an oversight committee to
organisations involved in establishing and the business base. Individual centres advise on the establishment and
centres in particular areas. will be responsible for business planning running of the network. The committee
and delivery of their objectives within the will act in an advisory capacity to both
core framework. They will also be the Technology Strategy Board and the
responsible for assets and liabilities, technology and innovation centres. Its
ownership and management of facilities, main responsibilities will be:
equipment and intellectual property.
K to advise the Technology Strategy
The performance, culture and feel of any Board on the strategic direction for
organisation inevitably comes down to a the centres and the establishment
few key individuals, such as the CEO, and operation of the network
Chair of the Board and other senior staff, K to ensure robust links between the
who must have the right blend of centres and the wider innovation
enthusiastic entrepreneurial spirit, system
industrial experience and knowledge of
K to advise on future investment
the academic base. To ensure the centres
decisions and continuity of funding
are run by highly capable, connected and
competent individuals, we will work with K to work with the Technology Strategy
each centre to create an appropriate Board on the appropriate success
framework for the appointment of these measures
key people. K to review progress being made,
including reviewing the business
and operational plans and
performance of individual centres
and reporting on the performance
of the network as a whole
K to champion the brand.
The oversight committee will consist of Brand and identity Intellectual property
individuals with senior level experience
Overall, the identity of the technology and Each centre will have a professional,
from across industry, the research base
innovation centres must be synonymous planned approach to the management of
including the research councils, the
with excellence. intellectual property rights. The detailed
Department for Business, Innovation and
approach will vary for each technology
Skills, and the Technology Strategy Board. The new network will have a clear and
area and sector but it must encourage
It will collect additional input from other strong corporate identity which will support
collaborative working. The arrangements
government departments, UK Trade & this reputation and contribute to the
should be flexible enough to be tailored to
Investment and learned bodies. It should positive role they are expected to play in
the different circumstances of partners
be chaired by a senior industrialist. future UK economic growth. Although
and business users, large and small, and
operating in different areas the centres
We propose to invite members on a need to protect existing intellectual
share a common vision; it will be important
personal basis, rather than representing property contributed to projects by both
for each centre to present itself as part of
corporate interests, and despite the broad the centre and its customers.
this powerful network for innovation.
range of interests to be represented would
Centres will need to adopt a transparent
target no more than 6-8 members. Further Developing an identity which will achieve
and open model to draw in underpinning
announcements will be made shortly. this over time requires expert work on the
intellectual property from research, and
title of the network, how it reflects the
ensure that new intellectual property
values and aspirations, how the naming
created within projects can be protected
will work in practice, and how it will be
and exploited successfully to the benefit of
visually represented. Views from the
the centre, its customers or both
community are being taken into account
depending on the circumstances.
in this development work, which is
currently under way and will be completed The Technology Strategy Board will not, in
in the summer of 2011. general, seek to take ownership of
intellectual property created in centres.
The process of establishing the network Initial areas for technology The new centre will provide integrated
of technology and innovation centres capability and embrace all forms of
began in early 2011. To implement the and innovation centres manufacture using metals and
strategy we have developed a process composites, in addition to process
which consists of five key stages: manufacturing technologies and bio-
High value manufacturing
K we screen technology areas which may processing. It will draw on excellent
have potential for a centre, using the The first confirmed technology and university research to accelerate the
technology and innovation centre criteria innovation centre is in high value commercialisation of new and emerging
to identify the strongest candidates manufacturing. Seven partners, with manufacturing technologies with new and
expertise in different areas of this field, existing portfolios of partner companies.
K we hold in-depth discussions with the
will work together to form the new centre.
business and academic community to During the initial phase to October 2011,
The partners are the Advanced Forming
assess the case for a centre in that area the partners will work to:
Research Centre (based in University of
K we run a two-stage process to select Strathclyde), the Advanced Manufacturing K develop a strategic framework of
the parties to run the centre and identify Research Centre (based in the University markets, industries and technologies
key partners of Sheffield), the Centre for Process which will guide the direction of the
K we develop the strategic framework and Innovation (located in Wilton and centre. This work will be conducted in
business plan for the specific centre in Sedgefield), the Manufacturing conjunction with the Institute for
conjunction with selected hosts Technology Centre (sponsored by the Manufacturing, University of Cambridge
K we then open the centre for business. universities of Birmingham, Loughborough K establish the company limited by
and Nottingham, and TWI Ltd), the guarantee which will operate the centre
National Composites Centre (based in and the legal framework within which
the University of Bristol), the Nuclear the individual partners will operate
Advanced Manufacturing Research K put in place the supporting legal
Centre (sponsored by the universities agreements
of Manchester and Sheffield) and the
K start recruitment of key personnel
Warwick Manufacturing Group (based
in the University of Warwick). These K agree a business plan and establish the
operations will bring together a grant funding mechanism.
considerable asset base of leading edge The centre in high value manufacturing is
equipment and highly skilled personnel. expected to be operating by October 2011.
Cell therapy The company landscape is dominated by The UK also has world-leading expertise in
small and medium-sized enterprises and offshore engineering and understanding of
The second technology and innovation they face the challenges inherent in working our seabed and marine environment. This
centre to be established will focus on cell with emerging technologies, including has given us a worldwide reputation in
therapies and advanced therapeutics. It technological, regulatory and strategic offshore facilities and makes the UK an
will help support the development and uncertainties. Developing cell therapies excellent base for offshore research.
commercialisation of these medicinal requires interdisciplinary approaches
products as well as the underpinning The technology and innovation centre in
covering several areas including
technologies that address the challenges offshore renewable energy will therefore
developmental and stem cell biology, gene
of manufacturing, quality control, safety focus on technologies for offshore wind,
therapy, cellular therapeutics, nanoscience,
and efficacy of these products. wave and tidal power.
biomaterials, bioengineering and chemical
Cell therapies can be described as the use biology as well as working with clinicians Innovation has the potential to make a
of living cells as, or incorporated into, a delivering treatments to patients. For particularly rapid impact in offshore wind,
medicinal product. These therapies can companies, access to enabling and the centre is likely to cover the range
have numerous uses, such as: infrastructure and expertise that address of technologies involved in offshore wind
their challenges will play a significant role power development – not only by
K enabling regeneration of cells tissues
in speeding up development and transferring knowledge from the
or organs (regenerative medicine)
accelerating routes to market. established offshore engineering industry
K using cells as delivery mechanisms
but also in the development of turbines
for therapies (eg, gene therapy) The cell therapy technology and innovation
and blades, where links can be made with
centre is expected to be a single,
K modulating the immune system to the UK’s lead in aerospace and control
autonomous entity, nationally inclusive and
approaches to treat infections and systems. The UK is in a strong position to
independent of higher education
cancers. take advantage of inward investment
institutions. The process to select a body
Cell therapies have already provided opportunities and establish a UK supply
or organisation to lead this centre began in
significant medical advances in areas such chain for offshore wind.
May 2011. Further information can be
as skin regeneration for burns patients and found on the Technology Strategy Board Marine power – wave and tidal – is a less
wound repair and cancer treatment vaccines website at www.innovateuk.org mature field but will also be a key focus of
for prostate cancer. Such treatments have the centre, using as it does many of the
the potential to go much further, with same offshore engineering capabilities.
next-generation products offering cures Offshore renewable energy Over time, the expertise of the centre
or treatments with long-term benefits. The third centre will be in the area of could also be applied to other areas of
The number of UK companies developing offshore renewable energy. offshore energy technology as they develop.
cell therapies has been growing, and the UK Renewable energy generation and supply We will be seeking expressions of interest
is a world leader in this area with a strong is now a major component of global in participating in this centre in the summer
academic science base and a supportive energy and economic policies. The UK of 2011.
clinical and regulatory environment. Good has abundant resources of wind, wave
progress has been made in recent years and tides and is focusing on offshore
including over £200m in public investment renewables as a major part of its future
in basic and translational stem cell science energy mix.
since 2003, and the launch of the
Technology Strategy Board’s regenerative
medicine programme in 2009.
Other candidate areas All these areas have high potential for UK Complex systems
innovation and growth, but our task is to
A key stage in the development of the A complex systems technology and
identify those where a technology and
technology and innovation centres innovation centre could focus on
innovation centre is the right solution at
programme has been identifying the areas developing theoretically well-founded yet
the right time.
which are priority candidates for the practical approaches to the engineering of
establishment of a centre – those where The funding and resources for the centres reliable, secure and trustworthy complex
there is most potential for a centre to have programme are finite, enabling the systems on which modern society relies.
a catalytic effect in stimulating future establishment of six centres in total in Such systems include elements of global
economic growth. this first phase. So it is from these priority financial markets, large parts of critical
areas that we will take forward proposals national infrastructure and the internet.
The analysis that we have undertaken has for a further three centres, after discussion Current approaches to software
drawn extensively on the responses to the with the relevant business and research engineering do not scale to the complexity
prospectus published in January 2011, communities. we see in software-intensive systems and
and has indicated that there are a number cannot take into account their emergent
of such promising areas, beyond the initial Technology areas not covered within these
properties and the behaviour of users.
three where the decision to establish a 10 priorities will still be the subject of
centre has already been taken. However, continued dialogue and, where relevant, a The centre could help UK software
more work is needed with the business range of options will be considered as part businesses and those which rely on
and academic communities to assess the of our ongoing programme of work to software performance to capitalise on the
contribution that potential centres in these support business-led technology innovation latest approaches, tools, languages and
areas might make and exactly what their in areas which present the greatest training, based critically on learning at an
focus might be. opportunity for future growth. However, industry level and to adopt emerging leaps
these 10 areas remain our focus for in practice at an early stage.
The further priority areas that we are technology and innovation centres in the
exploring as potential candidates for a short term.
centre, are:
The following pages outline the rationale
K complex systems
for selecting each of the 10 immediate
K digital media/creative industries priority areas.
K future cities
K future internet systems
K photonics
K resource efficiency
K sensor systems
The 10 candidate areas:
K smart grids and distribution K complex systems
K space
K digital media/creative industries
K transport systems and integration.
K future cities
K future internet systems
K photonics
K resource efficiency
K sensor systems
K smart grids and distribution
K space
K transport systems and integration.
Next steps
M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
Strategy Initial
screening
Getting involved
There is huge potential in this new network The Technology Strategy Board will be To join in these discussions please visit the
of sector-focused technology and continue to engage with the relevant Technology Strategy Board website at
innovation centres. But to achieve this business and academic communities to www.innovateuk.org and the _connect
potential will need the wide participation of explore in more detail what a technology collaboration and networking platform at
business, research and academia – who and innovation centre could achieve in https://ktn.innovateuk.org
themselves will both deliver and benefit each area, and the extent of business
from the advances that the centres will commitment and engagement to working
achieve. with and funding specific centres.
www.innovateuk.org