314 H Probability and Statistics

Traffic Modeling
Final Report
Members: Richa Prasad . Raza Kanjee

May 21, 2007

Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 1.2 What is Traffic Modeling? ........................................................1 Importance of Traffic Modeling ................................................3

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Problem Statement ................................................................4 Purpose of Study ...................................................................4 Source..................................................................................4 Software...............................................................................7

TECHNOLOGY SURVEY
3.1 3.2 3.3

Study Area Description ...........................................................8 Vehicle Detection and Tracking ................................................8 Accuracy of Source ................................................................9

DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Terminologies...................................................................... 10 Analysis by Time Period ........................................................ 10 Analysis by Lane .................................................................. 11 Lane Change Analysis........................................................... 12 Accepted Lead and Lag Gap Analysis ...................................... 13 Input-Output Analysis .......................................................... 14 Spacing Analysis .................................................................. 15

SUMMARY
6.1 6.2 Conclusion .......................................................................... 18 Future Work ........................................................................ 18

7 8

REFERENCES ............................................................................ 19 APPENDIX

8.1 8.2 C++ Code........................................................................... 20 Data Tables......................................................................... 24

1
1.1

INTRODUCTION
What is Traffic Modeling?

Traffic Modeling is a tool for analyzing major ways that people travel. The main cause of interest is generally to determine through measurements and modeling of data how efficient current road networks are in terms of time taken and miles traveled to reach a destination, and if the road conditions can be improved. Thus, some of the common measurements take are: Vehicle Based Performance These include Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) among other measurements. Person Based Performance These measures provide a mode-neutral way of comparing alternatives Mobility Performance Measures These are in relation to how long it should ideally take a person to reach a destination. Efficiency These measures should be chosen such that improvements in their values can be linked to positive changes in mobility measures, Reliability Measures The measurement of reliability is a key aspect of performance measurement and reliability metrics should be developed and applied. Use of continuous data is the best method for developing reliability metrics However, there are several challenges to collecting data for traffic modeling. Availability Continuous streams of data are not readily available in many regions. The snapshot nature of data availability makes it difficult to analyze conditions during unique events or over time Coverage Data is only available for a portion of the transportation network. This makes it difficult to accurately assess the entire impacts of congestion Quality Data sets often contain erroneous data or have gaps in missing data. The data sets need significant cleaning before they can be used and accuracy is compromised Standards Data is not consistently collected, analyzed, and stores across different regions, and often times within the same region. Standardization is needed to provide for the meaningful comparison of conditions in different regions

Traffic Modeling is based on providing estimates of what would likely happen as a result of a particular change in a system assuming that individuals reacted similarly to past behaviors. Models are thus not a hundred percent accurate since new patterns of behavior may emerge. Thus, transportation engineers also try to measure as often as possible, and if not possible, then model. Table 1 provides the advantages and limitations of using the two approaches. Advantages Provides predictive capabilities Once developed, can provide rapid analysis Limitations Only as good as the data used to develop the model Provides only a simulation of what is happening in the real-world. Results must be validated against observed data Difficult to predict traveler reactions to unique conditions or innovative strategies Can be costly to develop initial models

Modeling

Measurement

Can be developed to provide micro- and macro- level analysis Technology advances in data management are providing for more advanced and accurate models Provides a more accurate assessment of Data availability and quality issues may limit what is happening on the ground usefulness of the data Can be used to analyze traveler reactions to Can be costly to implement extensive data specific or unique events collection programs or systems Technology advances in data collection and better data management are providing improved measurements Table 1: Disadvantages and Limitations of Modeling VS Measurement

Figure 2 shows the tradeoffs between relative cost of analysis and conditions being analyzed. It provides us a picture of when to use which approach.

Figure 2: Modeling VS Measurement Trade-offs

1.2

Importance of Traffic Modeling

Traffic Modeling is extremely important for the improvement of the efficiency of road networks, thus reducing time required to reach a destination and allowing for greater and easier mobility of people traveling from far origins. One of the most standard measures used in Traffic Modeling are Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD). Figure 3 shows a satellite view of the City of Oxford and University area. The yellow circles represent the locations where the traffic flowing through the point was counted.

Figure 3: Satellite Map of City of Oxford and University area We judge through these counts how congested the downtown area is, how far a traveler comes from, what is the reason for the travel, and the hours of delay suffered by the driver. This provides improvements that can be implemented in future traffic models, as well as provides means of testing on current traffic models to predict the impact of the improvements. Since the downtown area is very congested, the vehicle data can also be used to estimate tailpipe emissions and zones with the worst air pollution. These are some of the ways traffic modeling can help improve future road networks and traffic management. The importance of performing such improvements lies in reducing delays, improving efficiency and productivity per person, allowing more flexibility in relocation to employees and in some cases, even determining how to make the region more environmentally friendly.

2
2.1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Problem Statement

The aim of this project was to understand traffic behavior on an interstate highway and put forth lines of further study. The approach to accomplish this goal was through analyzing: Spacing between vehicles in same lane Lane Change Behavior Flow and Speed of vehicles through a section

We compared our results to ideal road behavior patterns and tried to suggest reasons for differences in behavior.

2.2

Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study is to provide data on current road behavior patterns and to highlight any differences. The importance of this study pertains to all aspects of road planning and traffic management, among which some are: Road Capacity If the road being studied is heavily congested, then productivity and efficiency are being compromised. On the other hand, if a road is sparsely used, then perhaps extensions can be built to divert traffic to it from heavily congested roads. Mandatory lane change notification distance If a road is heavily congested, then vision obstruction is risked as well as the necessary distance for warning vehicles of mandatory lane changes increases, as vehicles will be spaced closer together. Air Pollution Heavily congested roads are at great risk of being seriously polluted, which may cause severe health problems to travelers and people living around the area. Safety The Registry of Motor Vehicles study book deeply stresses on maintaining a good distance between ones vehicle and the vehicle in front. Thus, roads suffering from heavy congestion are also at risk of being unsafe may it be due to close spacing or driver inattention due to frustration with the traffic.

2.3

Source

The source of our data is from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) test site on a section of the Interstate-80 highway in California. Figure 4 shows the section of the highway of which vehicle trajectory data was collected. The sections marked 1 to 7 represent the area covered by each of the seven cameras.

Figure 4: Study Area Schematic and Camera Coverage Figure 5 provides a more detailed schematic of the study area.

Local X (West) Local Y (North)

1 2 3 4 5 6
1605 ft 755 ft 2950 ft 590 ft

Traffic

EB I-

Figure 5: Detailed Schematic of Study Area The data collected was outputted in a text file. Table 1 shows the columns of data provided.
1 Veh ID 2 Frame ID 3 Total Frames 4 Time 5 Local X 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 v 13 14 15 16

Local Global Global SV L Y X Y

SV SV W Class

a Lane Lead Follow ID V V

Table 1: Data Table Columns 1. Vehicle ID Subject vehicle relative to which all data is presented in the row 2. Frame ID The data is collected 10 times per second 10 frames per second 3. Total Frames Number of frames for which data is available for subject vehicle 4. Time Global Time elapsed since Jan 1, 1970 (ms) 5. Local X Lateral coordinate of the front center of the vehicle with respect to the left-most edge of the section in the direction of travel (feet) 6. Local Y Longitudinal coordinate of the front center of the vehicle with respect to the entry edge of the section in the direction of travel (feet) 7. Global X - X Coordinate of the front center of the vehicle based on CA State Plane III in NAD83 (feet) 8. Global Y - Y Coordinate of the front center of the vehicle based on CA State Plane III in NAD83 (feet) 9. Vehicle Length (feet) 10. Vehicle Width (feet) 11. Vehicle Class 1: Motorcycle. 2: Auto. 3: Truck

12. Vehicle Velocity Instantaneous velocity of vehicle (feet/second) 13. Vehicle Acceleration Instantaneous acceleration of vehicle (feet/second2) 14. Lane ID - Current lane position of vehicle. Lane 1 is farthest left lane; lane 6 is farthest right lane. Lane 7 is the on-ramp at Powell Street, and Lane 9 is the shoulder on the right-side. 15. Preceding Vehicle - Vehicle ID of the lead vehicle in the same lane. A value of '0' represents no preceding vehicle - occurs at the end of the study section and off-ramp due to the fact that only complete trajectories were recorded by this data collection effort (vehicles already in the section at the start of the study period were not recorded) 16. Following Vehicle - Vehicle ID of the vehicle following the subject vehicle in the same lane. A value of '0' represents no following vehicle - occurs at the beginning of the study section and on-ramp due to the fact that only complete trajectories were recorded by this data collection effort (vehicle that did not traverse the downstream boundaries of the section by the end of the study period were not recorded) The time period relevant to our study was 4:00-4:15pm on April 13, 2005. The length of the section studied was 2950 ft as seen in Figure 5.

2.4

Software

There were three parts to this project: 1. Extraction of relevant data Problem: The text file containing the data was not formatted properly Solution: C++ program rewrote the data with proper formatting 2. Calculation of relevant data Problem: The size of the data was about 1 GB, thus rendering C++ inefficient Solution: Imported formatted data into SQL table for faster calculations 3. Graphing calculated data Matlab: Utilized for graphing of massive data. (Example: spacing analysis) Excel: Utilized for graphing of summarized data. (Example: number of vehicles entering study section)

3
3.1

TECHNOLOGY SURVEY
Study Area Description

Trajectory data of vehicles on Interstate-80 in Emeryville, California were collected through the use of video cameras mounted on a 30-story building, Pacific Park Plaza, which is located in 6363 Christie Avenue and is adjacent to interstate freeway I-80. The University of California at Berkeley maintains traffic surveillance capabilities at the building and the segment is known as the Berkeley Highway Laboratory (BHL) site. Lane numbering is incremented from the left-most lane (High Occupancy Vehicle lane). Video data were collected using seven video cameras, with the first camera recording the southernmost, and the seventh camera recording the northernmost section of the study area. Complete vehicle trajectories were transcribed at a resolution of 10 frames per second.

3.2

Vehicle Detection and Tracking

Vehicle trajectory data was transcribed by using special software specifically made for NGSIM. The program automatically detects and tracks most vehicles from video images and transcribes the trajectory data to a database. Figure 6 shows the flow process for the vehicle transcription. Inputs XML File o AVI Files Source Video Rectified Video o Calibration Parameters Camera Matrix (focal length, principal point) Distortion Parameters (lens) Rotation and Translation (world coordinates) o Shadow Parameters Database

Automatic Detection & Tracking

Accurate Yes Vehicle Trajectory Data

No

Alerts

Manual Corrections

Figure 6: Vehicle Transcription Process

The software detects vehicles in a user-defined detection zone, which is usually set in the camera that is looking straight down from the building, and then tracks vehicles both upstream and downstream from the point of detection. Hence, vehicle tracking is divided into two parts: a) forward cameras 4, 5, 6, 7, and b) reverse cameras 4, 3, 2, 1. Forward tracking was first performed for the data from 4:00pm to 4:15pm. Immediately after 4:15pm, vehicle detection was stopped. However, to account for full vehicle trajectories, tracking continued to allow the vehicles which were already detected to be tracked completely to the end of the study area. For reverse tracking, vehicle information was retrieved from the database generated by the forward tracking. Thus, reverse tracking started from 4:15pm and tracked back to 4:00pm. In the same way as forward tracking, vehicles enter into the tracking system and are tracked from start to end. Therefore, the actual tracking time is 3:58:55pm to 4:15:37pm.

3.3

Accuracy of Source

This is a key issue which unfortunately we cannot address due to a lack of response from Cambridge Measurements Inc the company which handled all the data collection. The importance of the inaccuracy is in validating this entire report as well as all lines of reasoning and future work we propose. In a broader context, the inaccuracy of the data effects all driving behavior pattern analyses and thus questions the validity of the source.

4
4.1

DATA ANALYSIS
Terminologies

TMS (t , s ) =

v(t , s)
i

n(t , s )

d (t , s) SMS (t , s ) = tt (t , s)
i i

TMS(t,s) = Time Mean Speed v(t,s) = Instantaneous speed of a vehicle i in section s during time period t at midsection n(t,s) = Number of vehicles traversing section s during time period t SMS(t,s) = Space Mean Speed d(t,s) = Distance traveled by vehicle i in section s during time period t tt(t,s) = Travel time of vehicle i in section s during time period t Time Mean Speed (TMS) provides a rough idea of how quickly the traffic is moving at the midpoint of a section. Space Mean Speed (SMS) is a more detailed calculation which provides the average speed of the traffic over the entire section being studied. TMS and SMS are very important in conjunction to each other because they provide the complete picture. For example, if the testing time period is 10 minutes and the traffic stood still for 30 seconds, then we would see a decline in the TMS but this decrease in magnitude would not be severe as the average instantaneous speed is being taken over 10 minutes which is relatively very large when compared to 30 seconds. However, SMS would indicate the stop in traffic for 30 seconds more significantly as tt(t,s) will have increased considerably.

4.2

Analysis by Time Period

Figure 7 shows the flow of traffic by time period.

9000 8500 8000 Flow (vph) 7500 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 4:00-4:05pm 4:05-4:10pm Time Period (Minutes) 4:10-4:15pm

Figure 7: Flow by Time Period

10

The flow of traffic is the vehicles traveling per hour through the section being studied. We see a dip in the flow between 4:05pm-4:10pm and generally the flow is lower than at 4:00-4:05pm. There could be two possible reasons for this: 1. Increasing congestion 2. Fewer vehicles In order to determine the cause, we graph the TMS and SMS by time period as seen in Figure 8.
25 Speed (mph) 20 15 10 5 0 4:00-4:05pm 4:05-4:10pm Time Period (Minutes) TMS (mph) SMS (mph) 4:10-4:15pm

Figure 8: TMS and SMS by Time Period We see a decline in the speeds of the vehicles over the 15 minutes time period. Thus, we can rule out possibility 2 as fewer vehicles on the road would result in increasing SMS and TMS. The cause is increasing congestion which has resulted in decreasing flow.

4.3

Analysis by Lane

Figure 9 shows the flow of traffic by lane.

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 Lane 4 5 6

Flow (vph)

Figure 9: Flow by Lane

11

The flow of the traffic is V-shaped for the analysis by lane. We see decreasing flow as one approaches Lane 3. Lane 6 has high flow probably due to its connection to outer road systems. Lane 1 is the HOV lane, thus it has fewer vehicles and higher flow. In order to explain the decline in flow towards Lane 3, we plot the TMS and SMS by Lane as seen in Figure 10.
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 Lane TMS (mph) SMS (mph) 4 5 6

Speed (mph)

Figure 10: TMS and SMS by Lane We see a fairly consistent TMS and SMS except for Lane 1 which is explained by it being the HOV Lane. The TMS remains almost constant for Lanes 2 to 3 thus telling us that the average instantaneous speeds of the vehicles across the lanes are approximately the same. The SMS however drops in magnitude between Lane 3 and 4, hence informing us that even though the average instantaneous speed at the midsection remains fairly constant, the vehicles are traveling slower in Lanes 4 to 6. This relates to the flow by lane graph which shows a similar dip around Lane 3.

4.4

Lane Change Analysis

It is possible that the decrease in SMS and flow in Lane 3 is due to a significant number of vehicles switching to and from Lane 3. When a vehicle makes a lane change, it has to slow down or speed up according to the lane it is changing into. Since the SMS decreases across lanes, we can assume that vehicles have to reduce their speed to switch lanes around Lane 3. Figure 11 shows the percent end lane distribution by starting lane.
120.00% 100.00% Ending Lane 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 1 2 3 Starting Lane 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6

Figure 11: Percent end lane distribution by starting lane

12

We see decreasing retention of vehicles from Lanes 1 to 5. The high retention in Lane 1 is explained by it being the HOV Lane while Lane 6 is connected to exit and entrance ramps which would specify that the car needs to travel in Lane 6 for a period of time before switching lanes or exiting the freeway. This is especially true since our study area length is not very long as well as the relatively low SMS in Lanes 3 to 5 would cause vehicles in Lane 6 to take longer in switching to Lane 5. As predicted, we do see a high retention of vehicles in Lane 3 as well as a relatively larger number of vehicles switching to Lane 3. However, Lane 4 shows a similar distribution, thus we cannot conclusively state that the high retention and switching of lanes to Lane 3 is the reason for the low flow and SMS in Lane 3.

4.5

Accepted Lead and Lag Gap Analysis

We have determined that the decrease in flow in Lane 3 is due to higher congestion in the lane as seen by the lower SMS. We have also concluded that a relatively higher number of vehicles switch to lane 3 and lane 3 also retains a large percentage of its vehicles. However, lane 4 shows a lower SMS but higher flow as well as almost the same distribution of lane change. In order to address this seeming contradiction, we should analyze the lead and lag gaps between cars when switching lanes. Figure 12 explains what we mean by accepted lead and lag gaps.
Subject Vehicle

Lag Vehicle

Lead Vehicle

Lag Gap

Lead Gap

Total Gap

Figure 12: Lead and Lag Gap Lead and Lag Gaps tell us how closely the subject vehicle can be spaced from the leading and following vehicle in the lane the subject vehicle wants to switch to. Thus, it would stand to reason that if the gaps are small, then the subject vehicle needs to more closely follow the speeds of the leading and following vehicle in the next lane in order to make the switch. Figure 13 shows the average accepted lead and lag gaps during lane change.

13

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 5 5 4 5 6 6 5

Gap (ft)

From Lane - To Lane Lead Gap (ft) Lag Gap (ft)

Figure 13: Average accepted lead and lag gaps during lane change We see from the graph that the gaps required to change into lane 3 are smaller for both lanes 2 and 4 when compared to the gaps required when changing from lane 2 to 1 or lane 4 to 5. We also see that the gaps required to switch from lane 3 to lane 4 or from lane 3 to lane 2 are the smallest. The closer the vehicles travel, the more probable it is that the vehicles will travel slower. This explains why we see a dip a lower SMS in Lane 3 thus resulting in the dip in flow. The accepted lead and lag gaps for switching between lanes 4-6 are fairly constant thus explaining their similar SMS. The high SMS in Lane 1 is the result of the large lead and lag gap that can be afforded when changing from Lane 2 to 1. This shows that the cars in Lane 1 are farther apart than any other lane, thus traveling at a higher velocity.

4.6

Input-Output Analysis

We plotted the number of vehicles entering and leaving the study area in order to determine if there is stand-still traffic at any point in time. Figure 14 shows this analysis.
2500 No. of Vehicles 2000 1500 1000 500 0 3:58:55-4:00 4:00-4:05 4:05-4:10 4:10-4:15 4:15-4:15:37 Volume Time Period (Minutes) Entering Vehicles Exiting Vehicles

Figure 14: Number of vehicles entering and leaving study area in 15 minutes

14

We can see from the graph that there is no stand-still traffic at any point in time. The number of cars entering and leaving the study area is equal.

4.7

Spacing Analysis

Figure 15 explains spacing between vehicles.

Subject Vehicle

Lead Vehicle

Spacing

Figure 15: Spacing between vehicles Spacing represents the distance between the leading vehicle and the subject vehicle. Figure 16 shows a box-plot of the spacing between vehicles.

75th Percentile Mean

25th Percentile Figure 16: Box-plot of Spacing The red lines above the 75th percentile represent each individual spacing. We can deduce from the box-plot that the median is likely to be lesser than the mean as the

15

fewer but larger spacings are going to pull up the mean. We can also predict that the mode is probably lower than the mean since the vehicles seem to be spaced closer together than farther apart. Figure 17 shows the spacing as a cumulative curve.

Figure 17: CDF Spacing The CDF validates the box-plot showing that most of the vehicles are closely spaced together. Figure 18 shows the histogram of spacing between vehicles.

Figure 18: Spacing Histogram

16

The maximum spacing is 1321.55 ft. We see that our hypothesis is correct. The mean is 67.85 ft which is smaller than the median 56.57 ft. The mode is also smaller than the mean 45 ft. Headway provides the time to travel from the front-center of the subject vehicle (at the speed of the subject vehicle) to the front-center of the preceding vehicle. Let us assume the following: Acceleration = 0 m/s2 Speed = Average SMS = 26.2 ft/s Thus: Mean Spacing = 67.85 ft Headway = 67.85/26.2 = 2.59 s Capacity = 3600/2.59 = 1390 vehicles/h Ideally, traffic engineers assume the capacity to be 2400 vehicles/h.

17

5
5.1

SUMMARY
Conclusion

We see that the road capacity is approximately half that which ideally assumed. This explains the low average SMS of 17.86 mph. Hence, we can conclude that the I-80 is heavily congested.

5.2

Future Work

Since the road capacity is half of the ideal road capacity, revision and construction of road plans needs to occur in order to increase the road capacity. The lowered road capacity, close spacing of vehicles, and low SMS suggest that the road is heavily congested. Studies of safety and air pollution need to be conducted in order to assess the full impact of the congestion.

18

REFERENCES

Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4:00-4:15 Vehicle Trajectory Data. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NGSIM I-80 Data Analysis Report. Oakland: 2005 Introduction to Traffic Modeling. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 9 May 2007. < http://www.berkshireplanning.org/3/2/6/> Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Linking Solutions to Problems. 10 November 2005. Federal Highway Administration. 9 May 2007. <http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion_report_04/appendix_B.htm> . Oxford/University of Mississippi Intelligent Transportation System Project. 9 May 2007. < http://oumits.olemiss.edu/research_traffic_count.htm>

19

7
7.1

APPENDIX
C++ Code

Format data #include "C314.h" ifstream infile; ofstream outfile; void filereadwrite() { int count = 0; string data; outfile.open("output.txt"); while(!infile.eof()) { infile>>data; count = count + 1; if(count == 18) { outfile<<data<<"\n"; count = 0; } else outfile<<data<<"\t"; } outfile.close(); } void fileopen() { switch (1) {

20

case 1: { infile.open("trajectories-0400-0415.txt", ios::in); filereadwrite(); infile.close(); } case 2: { infile.open("trajectories-0500-0515.txt", ios::in); filereadwrite(); infile.close(); } case 3: { infile.open("trajectories-0515-0530.txt", ios::in); filereadwrite(); infile.close(); } } } void main() { fileopen(); histogram(); } Format Spacing File void histogram() { string count[25000]; int flag, j = 0, k = 0, tellg = 0, length; char ch; ifstream myfile("spacingout.txt"); ofstream outfile("out.txt"); myfile.seekg(0, ios::end); length = myfile.tellg();

//format file //format spacing file from SQL

21

myfile.seekg(0, ios::beg); while(tellg != length) { char a[8]; flag = 0; k = 0; ch = '0'; while(ch != ',') { myfile.get(ch); a[k] = ch; k = k + 1; } if(k != 0) { a[k-1] = ' ';

for(int i = 0; i<25000; i++) { if(count[i] == a) { flag = 1; i = 25001; } }

if(flag == 0) { count[j] = a; outfile<<"count["<<j<<"] = "<<count[j]<<"\n"; j = j + 1; } } tellg = myfile.tellg(); } cout<<"closed file..\n";

22

outfile.close(); myfile.close(); } Header File (C314.h) #ifndef _C314_H #define _C314_H #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <string> #include <stdlib.h> #include <cstdlib> #include <windows.h> #include <conio.h> #include <ctype.h> #include <process.h> #include <sstream> #include <stdio.h> using namespace std; void filereadwrite(); void fileopen(); void histogram(); #endif

23

7.2

Data Tables

Time Period Analysis Time Period 4:00-4:05pm 4:05-4:10pm 4:10-4:15pm Average Lane Analysis Lane 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Flow (vph) 1420 1414 1170 1278 1306 1556 1357 TMS (mph) 40.2 18.81 18.14 17.33 19.21 18.21 22.16 SMS (mph) 30.03 20.28 20.55 14.5 15.18 14.41 19.17 Flow (vph) 8436 7968 8028 8144 TMS (mph) 23.44 22.13 20.95 22.19 SMS (mph) 20.01 17.82 15.64 17.86

Percentage End Lane Distrubition by Starting Lane Ending Lane 3 4 1.12% 0.56% 4.53% 0.30% 75.00% 4.04% 19.87% 65.71% 7.07% 26.26% 0.68% 4.44%

Starting Lane 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 95.24% 2.72% 1.84% 0.64% 0.00% 0.00%

2 2.80% 90.94% 16.91% 8.33% 1.68% 0.00%

5 0.00% 0.00% 0.74% 3.21% 55.22% 25.26%

6 0.28% 1.51% 1.47% 2.24% 9.76% 69.62%

24

Accepted Lead and Lag Gaps During Lane Change From Lane 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 4 6 5 To Lane 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 Lead Gap (ft) 41.15 99.37 40.19 29.6 35.8 37.45 49.93 30.87 35.81 35.13 Lag Gap (ft) 20.28 90.92 47.33 39.45 31.98 46.92 52.76 38.25 49.43 51.94 Total Gap (ft) 61.43 190.29 87.52 69.05 67.78 84.37 102.69 69.12 85.24 87.07

Input-Output Analysis 3:58:55-4:00 1 53 0 54 0 4:00-4:05 62 633 657 695 657 4:05-4:10 64 622 653 686 653 4:10-4:15 64 553 674 617 674 4:15-4:15:37 0 0 68 0 68 Volume

On-Ramp Flow Entering - Freeway Lane Exiting - Freeway Lane Entering Vehicles Exiting Vehicles

2052 2052

25