Suck holes thumb in mouth other up their ass rather reluctant to switch

Justice shell game with Rule of Law rendered as meaningless as the magnificent user friendly brains of the majority populace Entertain the ridiculous notion the populace not anxious to observe the switch

10% Wealthy

90% Containment factor

Who can deny the Piggery of Wolves SELF Scum Earths Life Forms CIPIS - Capitalist Imperialist Pig Insatiable Satanic of CNN Capitalist Nefarious Narrators are Learned and Sane sufficient to stand trial as CIPIS abrogated since ancient times under the auspices of NHL Natural Humanic Law GREDSCROL Golden Rule Equality Democratic Spirit Constitution Rule of Law
SAD Song and Dance Name that tune Split Personality Evil Good Point of View 90% containment factor Quality of life boxed in by PRICK inciting FIBIB eccentric immune Livid Buried Alive though with little scratch with conviction and fortitude scratch their way out The conviction and fortitude to Capitalism dissipates as the willingness of the 90% majority to nourish it. ORBIT ROP Outside Routine Box Intellectual Trigger Reverse Osmosis Psychosis The 10% wealthy in the 90% containment factor the obvious ingredients of Humanic sustainable growth will permit them to continue to spew their perceptions of Capitalism on CNN that I suspect will change their tune though still tuned to same station Capitalism as illegal as always was with Intellectual Prominence now

confirming so it is and so it was never heard of or from again

Oinkings of the Wolves Rat Micing SELF

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy
In his 1879 book Progress and Poverty, Henry George argued that a majority of wealth created in a "free market" economy is appropriated by land owners and monopolists through economic rents, and that concentration of such unearned wealth is the root cause of poverty.[4] "Behind the abstraction known as 'the market' lurks a set of institutions designed to maximize the wealth and power of the most privileged group of people in the world -- the creditor-rentier class of the first world and their junior partners in the third".[9] According to some modern analysts, private savings are not only unnecessary for economic growth, but they are often harmful to the overall economy.[7] In an advanced industrial society, business credit is necessary for a healthy economy. A business that wants to expand production needs to command the labor of others, and money is an effective mechanism for exercising this authority.[7] It is often cheaper for a business to borrow capital from a bank than to stockpile cash itself. This was the purpose of the state banking system in the U.S. prior to the Civil War. For an industrial firm in an age of continued technological innovation, a considerable amount of earnings must be retained in order to invest in future improvements.[10] If private savings are loaned out to entrepreneurs who use them to buy raw materials and hire workers, then aggregate demand is not reduced.[7] However, when private savings are not reinvested, the whole economy suffers recession, unemployment, and the eventual disappearance of excess savings.[7] By assuming that producers immediately spend the money they receive as the price for goods and services, Say's Law overlooks the key fact of retained earnings. Even if the retained earnings are deposited in a bank they will not necessarily result in new spending. For a variety of reasons, most notably the necessity of retained earnings and the inclusion in prices of the costs of borrowing, sufficient income is never returned to the producing economy in order for people to purchase what can be manufactured.[10] In this view, unemployment is not an aberration of capitalism, indicating any sort of systemic malfunction. Rather, unemployment is a necessary structural feature of capitalism, intended to discipline the workforce. If unemployment is too low, workers make wage demands that either cuts into profits to an extent that jeopardize future investment, or are passed on to consumers, thus generating inflationary instability. David Schweickart suggests, "Capitalism cannot be a full-employment economy, except in the very short term. For unemployment is the "invisible hand" -- carrying a stick -- that keeps the workforce in line."[7] In this view, Adam Smith's "invisible hand" does not seem reliable to guide economic forces on a large scale.[1] Assuming business credit could come from public sources rather than from the accumulations of private savers, some analysts consider interest payments to private savers both undeserved and unnecessary for economic growth. Moreover, the personal decision to save rather than consume decreases aggregate demand, increases the likelihood of unemployment, and exacerbates the tendency toward economic stagnation. Since wealthy people tend to save more than poor people, the propensity of an economy to slump because of excess saving becomes ever more acute as a society becomes more affluent.[7] The research of Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett suggests that health and social problems are significantly worse in more unequal wealthy nations.[11] They argue that there are "pernicious effects that inequality has on societies: eroding trust, increasing anxiety and illness, (and) encouraging excessive consumption" [12] [edit] Monopoly power versus purchasing power The discipline of economics is largely a study of scarcity management. "Absent scarcity and alternative uses of available resources, there is no economic problem".[13] In this regard, many theories of Economic Democracy hold that conditions of scarcity are artificially maintained by corporate structures that confine abundance to an exclusively entitled minority. In this view, socio-economic imbalance stems not from a failure to manage limited resources in a world of scarcity, but from mismanagement of virtually unlimited abundance and prosperity.[5]In his book Labor and Other Capital (1849), American businessman, Edward Kellogg (17901858), said that: "Money power is not only the most governing and influential, but it is also the most unjust and deceitful of all earthly powers. It entails upon millions excessive toil, poverty and want, while it keeps them ignorant of the cause

of their sufferings; for, with their tacit consent, it silently transfers a large share of their earnings into the hands of others, who have never lifted a finger to perform any productive labor."[14] While he considers these functions a public wrong, Kellogg also asserts it is the responsibility of the public to find and implement a remedy. Generally considered monopoly power, this "public wrong" is viewed by many as the most influential factor in artificial scarcity. In this regard, Henry George further suggests: "There is in reality no conflict between labor and capital; the true conflict is between labor and monopoly... Abolish the monopoly that forbids men to employ themselves and capital could not possibly oppress labor... [R]emove the cause of that injustice which deprives the laborer of the capital his toil creates and the sharp distinction between capitalist and laborer would, in fact, cease to exist".[15] While some consider land to be the primary source of wealth, others propose the labor theory of value (first introduced by John Locke, developed by Adam Smith and later Karl Marx), arguing that labor is the fundamental source of value. In these terms, "money is first, and foremost, a contract against another persons labor. Except for wealth produced by nature, value is properly a measure of the time and quality of all productive labor spent producing a product or service. If the difference between the payment received for productive labor and the price paid by the consumer for a product or service is greater than fair value for expediting that trade, either the producer was underpaid, the final consumer was overcharged, or both. When intermediaries underpay producers or overcharge consumers, they are siphoning away the production of the labors of one or the other, or both."[1][16] For example, many analysts consider invention a "more or less costless store of knowledge, captured by monopoly capital and protected in order to make it secret and a 'rare and scarce commodity', for sale at monopoly prices. So far as invention is concerned, a price is put on them not because they are scarce but in order to make them scarce to those who want to use them."[17][18][19] Patent monopolies capitalize stock values far above tangible labor value. The difference between labor-value and monopoly-value is transferred to consumers in the form of higher prices, and collected as "profit" by intermediaries who have contributed nothing to earn it.[19] Under such conditions, analysts generally agree that society does not currently earn enough to buy what the economy produces. The difference between earnings and prices is typically appropriated by industrial and banking centers of capital through monopoly control of finance and other market resources. Such exclusive entitlement tends to artificially impose conditions of economic scarcity upon the majority of the population.[5] While the accelerating advance of technology, developed and maintained by labor, tends to generate a virtually unlimited abundance, this process also drives wages down as workers are replaced by machines, ironically minimizing the purchasing power of workers in the market.[20] In June 2006, investment bank, Goldman Sachs, reported: "The most important contribution to the higher profit margins over the past five years has been a decline in Labor's share of national income." [edit] In his 1879 book Progress and Poverty, Henry George argued that a majority of wealth created in a "free market" economy is appropriated by land owners and monopolists through economic rents, and that concentration of such unearned wealth is the root cause of poverty.[4] "Behind the abstraction known as 'the market' lurks a set of institutions designed to maximize the wealth and power of the most privileged group of people in the world -- the creditor-rentier class of the first world and their junior partners in the third".[9] According to some modern analysts, private savings are not only unnecessary for economic growth, but they are often harmful to the overall economy.[7] In an advanced industrial society, business credit is necessary for a healthy economy. A business that wants to expand production needs to command the labor of others, and money is an effective mechanism for exercising this authority.[7] It is often cheaper for a business to borrow capital from a bank than to stockpile cash itself. This was the purpose of the state banking system in the U.S. prior to the Civil War. For an industrial firm in an age of continued technological innovation, a considerable amount of earnings must be retained in order to invest in future improvements.[10] If private savings are loaned out to entrepreneurs who use them to buy raw materials and hire workers, then aggregate demand is not reduced.[7] However, when private savings are not reinvested, the whole economy suffers recession, unemployment, and the eventual disappearance of excess savings.[7] By assuming that producers immediately spend the money they receive as the price for goods and services, Say's Law overlooks the key fact of retained earnings. Even if the retained earnings are deposited in a bank they will not necessarily result in new spending. For a variety of reasons, most notably the necessity of retained earnings and the inclusion in prices of the costs of borrowing, sufficient income is never returned to the producing economy in order for people to purchase what can be manufactured.[10]

In this view, unemployment is not an aberration of capitalism, indicating any sort of systemic malfunction. Rather, unemployment is a necessary structural feature of capitalism, intended to discipline the workforce. If unemployment is too low, workers make wage demands that either cuts into profits to an extent that jeopardize future investment, or are passed on to consumers, thus generating inflationary instability. David Schweickart suggests, "Capitalism cannot be a full-employment economy, except in the very short term. For unemployment is the "invisible hand" -- carrying a stick -- that keeps the workforce in line."[7] In this view, Adam Smith's "invisible hand" does not seem reliable to guide economic forces on a large scale.[1] Assuming business credit could come from public sources rather than from the accumulations of private savers, some analysts consider interest payments to private savers both undeserved and unnecessary for economic growth. Moreover, the personal decision to save rather than consume decreases aggregate demand, increases the likelihood of unemployment, and exacerbates the tendency toward economic stagnation. Since wealthy people tend to save more than poor people, the propensity of an economy to slump because of excess saving becomes ever more acute as a society becomes more affluent.[7] The research of Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett suggests that health and social problems are significantly worse in more unequal wealthy nations.[11] They argue that there are "pernicious effects that inequality has on societies: eroding trust, increasing anxiety and illness, (and) encouraging excessive consumption" [12] [edit] Monopoly power versus purchasing power The discipline of economics is largely a study of scarcity management. "Absent scarcity and alternative uses of available resources, there is no economic problem".[13] In this regard, many theories of Economic Democracy hold that conditions of scarcity are artificially maintained by corporate structures that confine abundance to an exclusively entitled minority. In this view, socio-economic imbalance stems not from a failure to manage limited resources in a world of scarcity, but from mismanagement of virtually unlimited abundance and prosperity.[5] In his book Labor and Other Capital (1849), American businessman, Edward Kellogg (17901858), said that: "Money power is not only the most governing and influential, but it is also the most unjust and deceitful of all earthly powers. It entails upon millions excessive toil, poverty and want, while it keeps them ignorant of the cause of their sufferings; for, with their tacit consent, it silently transfers a large share of their earnings into the hands of others, who have never lifted a finger to perform any productive labor."[14] While he considers these functions a public wrong, Kellogg also asserts it is the responsibility of the public to find and implement a remedy. Generally considered monopoly power, this "public wrong" is viewed by many as the most influential factor in artificial scarcity. In this regard, Henry George further suggests: "There is in reality no conflict between labor and capital; the true conflict is between labor and monopoly... Abolish the monopoly that forbids men to employ themselves and capital could not possibly oppress labor... [R]emove the cause of that injustice which deprives the laborer of the capital his toil creates and the sharp distinction between capitalist and laborer would, in fact, cease to exist".[15] While some consider land to be the primary source of wealth, others propose the labor theory of value (first introduced by John Locke, developed by Adam Smith and later Karl Marx), arguing that labor is the fundamental source of value. In these terms, "money is first, and foremost, a contract against another persons labor. Except for wealth produced by nature, value is properly a measure of the time and quality of all productive labor spent producing a product or service. If the difference between the payment received for productive labor and the price paid by the consumer for a product or service is greater than fair value for expediting that trade, either the producer was underpaid, the final consumer was overcharged, or both. When intermediaries underpay producers or overcharge consumers, they are siphoning away the production of the labors of one or the other, or both."[1][16] For example, many analysts consider invention a "more or less costless store of knowledge, captured by monopoly capital and protected in order to make it secret and a 'rare and scarce commodity', for sale at monopoly prices. So far as invention is concerned, a price is put on them not because they are scarce but in order to make them scarce to those who want to use them."[17][18][19] Patent monopolies capitalize stock values far above tangible labor value. The difference between labor-value and monopoly-value is transferred to consumers in the form of higher prices, and collected as "profit" by intermediaries who have contributed nothing to earn it.[19] Under such conditions, analysts generally agree that society does not currently earn enough to buy what the economy produces. The difference between earnings and prices is typically appropriated by industrial and banking centers of capital through monopoly control of finance and other market resources. Such exclusive entitlement tends to artificially impose conditions of economic scarcity upon the majority of the

population.[5] While the accelerating advance of technology, developed and maintained by labor, tends to generate a virtually unlimited abundance, this process also drives wages down as workers are replaced by machines, ironically minimizing the purchasing power of workers in the market.[20] In June 2006, investment bank, Goldman Sachs, reported: "The most important contribution to the higher profit margins over the past five years has been a decline in Labor's share of national income." [edit]Enclosure of the commons The term "land" typically denotes the "universe of natural opportunities" or "public utilities", generally known as the commons. Artificially restricted access of labor to common resources is generally considered monopoly or enclosure of the commons. Due to the economic imbalance inherently imposed, such monopoly structures tend to be centrally dictated by imperial law, and must be maintained by military force, unequal trade agreements, or both.[4] In 1911, American journalist Ambrose Bierce defined "land" as: "A part of the earth's surface, considered as property. The theory that land is property subject to private ownership and control is the foundation of modern society.... Carried to its logical conclusion, it means that some have the right to prevent others from living; for the right to own implies the right exclusively to occupy; and in fact laws of trespass are enacted wherever property in land is recognized. It follows that if the whole area of terra firma is owned by A, B and C, there will be no place for D, E, F and G to be born, or, born as trespassers, to exist".[21] In The Servile State (1912), Hilaire Belloc referred to the Enclosures Movement when he said, "England was already captured by a wealthy oligarchy before the series of great industrial discoveries began". If you sought the accumulated wealth preliminary to launching new industry, "you had to turn to the class which had already monopolized the bulk of the means of production in England. The rich men alone could furnish you with those supplies". When Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776, the dominant form of business was partnership, in which regional groups of co-workers ran co-owned businesses. From this perspective, many considered the corporate model stock sold to strangersinherently prone to fraud. While numerous scandals historically support this dim view of corporate policy, small partnerships could not possibly compete with the aggregate capital generated by corporate economies of scale. According to Peter Barnes, author of Capitalism 3.0, the greatest advantage of corporations over any other business model is their ability to raise capital from strangers. In this regard, corporations are aided by laws that limit stockholders liability to the amounts they have invested.[22] In A Preface To Economic Democracy, Robert A. Dahl suggests that agrarian economy and society in the early United States "underwent a revolutionary transformation into a new system of commercial and industrial capitalism that automatically generated vast inequalities of wealth, income, status, and power." Dahl claims that such inequalities result from the "liberty to accumulate unlimited economic resources and to organize economic activity into hierarchically governed enterprises." [23] The concept of the corporation reaches back to Roman times. However, according to author Greg MacLeod, "the modern business corporation evolved radically from its ancient roots into a form with little relation to the purpose as understood by historians of law." John Davis, a legal historian, notes that the precursor of the business corporation was the first monastery established in the sixth century, the purpose of which was to serve society. Most business corporations before 1900 developed in Britain, where they were established by royal charter, with the expectation of a contribution to society. Incorporation was a privilege granted in return for service to the crown or the nation. MacLeod goes on to say: "A corporation is considered by the law to exist as a legal person. In the Middle Ages it was called a persona ficta. This is a very useful way of looking at a business corporation, because it suggests correctly that the corporate person has a certain personality. It has duties and responsibilities vested unto it by the legitimate government or society that fostered it. The corporate person receives great benefits from society and, in return, it must exercise great responsibilities. One of the most basic responsibilities is job creation, a fundamental need in any society." [24] By the mid-nineteenth century, however, corporations could live forever, engage in any legal activity, and merge with or acquire other corporations. In 1886, the U.S. Supreme Court legally recognized corporations as persons, entitled under the Fourteenth Amendment to the same protections as living citizens. Unlike average citizens, corporations also have large flows of money at their disposal. With this money they hire lobbyists, donate

copiously to politicians, and sway public opinion. One important aspect of the rule-of-law initiatives is the study and analysis of the rule of laws impact on economic development. The rule-of-law movement cannot be fully successful in transitional and developing countries without a answer to the question: does the rule of law matter for economic development or not?[53] Constitutional economics is the study of the compatibility of economic and financial decisions within existing constitutional law frameworks, and such a framework includes government spending on the judiciary which in many transitional and developing countries is completely controlled by the executive. Catch 22 Catch up Dogs chasing tails Go ahead back up finally miscommunication Stuck Up Heads in Deep Shit of own asses Circular logic Doublethink http://www.scribd.com/doc/60740508/Orwellian-Boomerang-Justifiable-Genocide-Kill-the-Satanic-Bilderbergs In his essay Politics and the English Language (1946), Orwell wrote about the importance of honest and clear language and said that vague writing can be used as a powerful tool of political manipulation. In Nineteen EightyFour he described how the state controlled thought by controlling language, making certain ideas literally unthinkable. The adjective Orwellian refers to the frightening world of Nineteen Eighty-Four, in which the state controls thought and misinformation is widespread. Several words and phrases from Nineteen Eighty-Four have entered popular language. Newspeak is a simplified and obfuscatory language designed to make independent thought impossible. Doublethink means holding two contradictory beliefs simultaneously. The Thought Police are those who suppress all dissenting opinion. Prolefeed is homogenised, manufactured superficial literature, film and music, used to control and indoctrinate the populace through docility. Big Brother is a supreme dictator who watches everyone. Mandate If the corporations are to be considered Persons then they are Corporations in name only subject to same laws as persons and must pay 1. Humanic Appropriate Taxes They will find themselves better off to pay their slaves Humanic Appropriate wages and fair distribution of wealth accomplished when private sector comparative jobs are paid equally That which never was cannot be restored as in Freedom to America the populace under CIPIS the PRICK can only restore FIBIB mandatory to their success to steal quality of life difficult to prove stolen that which was never possessed for the Mad Hadders have always Had the Had none the wiser as Wise Fools place their loonies in the Political Juke box to play what they want to hear soothing them through the persistent hard times imminent of CIPIS Whilst the populace gradually awakening from passive sleep the United Kin of the United Kin New World Order www.uknwo.com not resigned to defeat organize and amass the coherent to kill the abrogated Satanic at the root In their sleep Truth permeates smothering SSRE Satanic Spirit Roman Empire as one by one brought to true justice as the people scrutinize the once Satanic courts Poof become Humanic as simple as that as is the S the ESS Epitome Simplicity Sanity that gives credence to that least apt to be mistaken by humankind needing only to be sane human to know who are the CIPIS CNN helps us with that Indiana front and center Satanic Governor implementing PRICK inciting FIBIB suggesting the responsible for chaos are attentive to responsible safety precautions while Reality and History beg to differ must be aware as must we all with responsibility accountability attached hand in hand to deterrence to the certainty of the SOS Sanctity of Spirit that protects us all only when due punishment is appropriately administered FATS For All To See will God come to surpass the value of Gold most precious when evenly spread. RAP HE HAW Reality Arouses Passive Humanic Equals Heads Against Wall Crash Course

Wiser than yesterday smart as ancient times Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception Truth is that which would be observed by God whether or not He exists or one believes He exists The ideal is simply reality sanely dealt with Reality the Key Passiveness a reality proclaiming to be realist without a clue a shoe in impossible to be adept to the naturalism of TECE PNTR RCR Trial Error Cause Effect Progressive Nature Thought Reason Re-calibration Constant Retrospect

In Satanic PRICK inciting FIBIB over and over again doing what Satanic must do for the right to genocide all over the place Neutering DJ VUs procon Tradition Diversionary Elusive Justice Articulated Valid Understanding Satanic aka SEEDROLL Satanic Entrepreneur Elusivity Discretionary Rule of Law Lucidity Integral role in the SSS Satanic Sucker Sandwich aka Satanic Sucker School Roll the humanic to Kingdom come The Only Way to go >>> Abrogated Satanic PRICK must Go to Hell so written so IT will be

Fine words and an insinuating appearance are seldom associated with true virtue I cite Confucius while unshaven, unbathed punching keys couch slouch sitting in my under wear with ICIM Immaculate Conception In Mind The Spirit of Law FIXED indifferent to IBP Ignorant Bias Perception when stringently enforced IBP vanishes replaced with 20/20 Vision eta 2020 Beginning of end of Struggle of Humankind now underway priority one cut Bilderberg off at the pass eta 9/11/11 presently working the Satanic Stock Market www.1bighuh.com United Kin kept up to speed www.RCMPNEWS.com Keep an eye on CNN getting familiar with the enemy how they point the finger at each other attempting to draw the gold to SELF all ever attentive to maintain the populace in FIBIB being a PRICK thing to do but abrogated Satanic what else can they do tell truth giving self and stolen luxurious up for the benefit of mere Humanic slaves.