CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, COMPLAINT, OBJECTIONS AND REMEDY IN RE CITY OF CHICAGO COPRORATION CITATION# 91xxxxxxxx OF 1/11/2011

1. A City of Chicago Corporation (hereinafter Chicago) Citation is a

negotiable commercial instrument issued as an offer to recipient to contract. 2. Said Offer is hereby Refused Without Dishonor within 72 hours of offer in accordance with Illinois commercial Statute under (UCC2[201:721], UCC3-202, UCC3-501) 3. As a corporate subdivision of Illinois following the United States, the uniformly accepted Clearfield Doctrine [Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942)] applies to Chicago in all commercial activity and therefore Chicago is absent sovereignty in these matters 4. Charge is also false. No requirement for display of said Chicago City Sticker for vehicles without Chicago. (See attached Secretary of State Address Registration) 5. In consideration of the facts, Chicagos Individual Agent issuing said Citation has perjured themselves by their signed affidavit at the bottom of said Citation by averring and signing their name that I certify that the facts and, if applicable, images set forth are true and correct. 6. As Agent representing Chicago as Principal, Agent directly implicates and binds Principal (UCC 1-201, UCC 3-402), which include liabilities for misrepresentations as in aforesaid perjury. 7. Upon receipt of this notice, Chicago agrees it will provide written response to addressee certifying that this Citation has been removed from all records including city, state and federal (including but not limited to paper and electronic storage systems like databases) within 15 days of this notice 8. Chicago agrees that Failure to remove this citation from records as stated above within 10 days of this notice will result in an initial fine of $1,000 and an additional fee of $30,000 if this citation contributes to the seizure of property/collateral including the Ford E150 Van commonly identified by Illinois ID Plate# XXX111. I hereby certify under oath and under penalty of perjury that the above is true, correct and not misleading. __________________________________________ First-Middle: Last Date Affiant Without the United States c/o 1234 Someplace Drive Hopeful Heights, State [xxxxx]

Tape/Staple Ticket Here with no-contract/refusal for cause

Reference for recipients convenience: Clearfield Doctrine - Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942) "Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942) What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder- in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.

This case is very important because it is a 1942 case after the Erie RR v. Tomkins 304 U.S. 64, (1938) case in which the Legislatures and Judiciary changed from legislating under "Public Law", which was in consonance with the Constitution, to legislating under "Public Policy" according to the wishes of the "Creditors of the US Corporation".