Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Researchers have known for quite a while that ellagic acid is a cancer killer; but
they have not known how it did its work so effectively on tumors. Now they do.
Ellagic acid has previously been demonstrated to have antioxidant and antifibrosis
properties, in addition to showing effects against several cancers, yet its
mechanisms of action had not been defined.
A team of researchers at the West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Healthcare
Center administered three concentrations of ellagic acid to two human pancreatic
cancer cell lines. Pancreatic cancer has so far been resistant to traditional
cancer treatments; that's why, of course, you've all heard that if you're
diagnosed with pancreatic cancer it's tantamount to a death sentence.
Apoptosis, cell proliferation, and other factors were measured after 48 hours of
the cells' exposure to ellagic acid. The researchers found ellagic acid to "dose-
dependently increase apoptosis in the first pancreatic cancer cell line."
Significant ellagic acid-induced apoptosis was also observed in the second cell
line, although the association was not dose-dependent. Cell proliferation was
reduced 20 fold by the highest concentration of ellagic acid in the first cell
line, and was dose-dependently reduced, although to a lesser extent, in the second
line.
The researchers found that ellagic acid induced apoptosis in both cell lines by
"reducing the binding activity of the prosurvival transcription factor nuclear
factor-kappa beta."
http://www.lef.org/
The big problem, however, in ever getting doctors to recommend a natural substance
in cancer treatment is this: The American Medical Association (AMA) controls
America's (and much of the world's) methods of treating cancer.
If, however, doctors are being sued for deviating from those protocols, the AMA
will not only not send lawyers and "experts" to help them; they may well send
attorneys to help the plaintiff and "experts" to testify against doctors that have
deviated from the AMA's protocols.
This is the very reason that even after trillions of dollars in government and
private research funds and thirty-six years after the government nationalized
cancer and declared a war on the disease, if you went to the typical traditionally
trained American oncologist in 1950 or if you go in 2008, the methods of treatment
(for the most part, in almost every case) are exactly the same: radiate and/or
chemorate and/or operate.
If doctors can't carry out one of the above three methods of treatment on the
cancer, they're going to scare their patients into believing that they have as
much chance of surviving as a gnat in a hail storm. And this is not so.
And folks, I'm very sorry to say, that's not likely to change anytime soon.
Note: I want it clear that I'm not saying that alternative methods are the
absolute answer to curing this horrible disease—nay, it's a plague. And I'm not
saying that I personally know which methods are the right ones, but I will say
this: we've all had hundreds of friends and family members go through the whole
gamut of traditional treatments, live a tortured physical existence and on an
emotional heaven to the abyss ride for months (or even years), then die.
After years of studying and observing both ends of treatment, the traditional and
the alternative, I believe that the way to beat the plague is to add the latter
along with the traditional.