You are on page 1of 3

Prepared Statement WHMP

For immediate release: September 19, 2011 Contact: Christina Trinchero, CDH Marketing Communications, (413) 582-2421

Safe Staffing Inquiry: CDH Supports MHA Position


NORTHAMPTON In preparation for the Legislatures Joint Committee on Public Health on Tuesday, Sept. 20, the Massachusetts Hospital Association (MHA) summarizes the reasons nursing rations will not work. Cooley Dickinson Hospital agrees with their summary, which appears below:

HEALTHCARE REFORM: It's About High-Quality Patient Care for All, Not Job Security for Some
NO TWO PATIENTS, NO TWO HOSPITALS, NO TWO NURSES ARE ALIKE.
Effective patient care must be based on the individual needs of each patient, which can change hour-by-hour. Because staffing needs can change along with changes in the patient's condition, nurse leaders and RNs need the flexibility to use all members of the caregiving team to meet patients' needs. A nurse's education level, experience, as well as the technological resources of the hospital itself, all influence how a patient is cared for. Because hospitals or hospital units aren't identical to another, their staffing should also not be identical. Government-mandated one-size-fits-all ratios or fixed-formulas, which are arbitrary, fixed, universal numbers, run counter to the flexible, coordinated care demanded by patient needs.

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SCIENTIFIC STUDY NEVER THAT DEFINES THE IDEAL NUMBER OF NURSES PER PATIENT.
While studies have shown that having more nurses is generally good for patient safety (we agree!), no study has determined the correct number of nurses yet the MNA bill would do

just that: set a static minimum ratio for departments, units and types of nursing care that all hospitals must follow. Hospitals must be empowered to create care systems that are tailored to each individual hospital. This flexibility allows each hospital to meet the ever-changing patient care needs with input from direct care registered nurses. Since California enacted its mandated ratio law in 1999, many states have looked at the mandated approach to patient care and recognized its liabilities. After more than 12 years, not a single state has followed the lead of California. Massachusetts hospitals were the first in the nation to voluntarily post nursing quality data through our patientcarelink.org website, and we believe in hospital-specific transparency regarding healthcare quality. MHA hospitals are committed to transparency about the care they provide and should be held accountable for that care. This is a far more rational and effective way to improve patient care than ratios and fixed-formulas.

CAREGIVERS NEED THE FLEXIBILITY TO USE THE ENTIRE CAREGIVING TEAM IN DELIVERING HIGH-QUALITY, SAFE CARE.
Flexible staffing practices determined by staff nurses, nurse leaders and hospital colleagues working together based on the individual patient's condition helps provide the best possible care. Massachusetts exceeds the national average on numerous, scientifically based, nationally approved measures of patient safety and quality. This accomplishment has resulted from a singular focus on patient care and innovation in the use of resources to improve that care. In the five years since the Massachusetts hospital community went live with www.patientcarelink.org the first in the nation effort providing public transparency of nurse staffing the amount of time devoted to direct patient care by both caregiving teams and RNs alone has steadily increased. This means that in the harshest of economic times, when the number of patients seeking care has increased, (that is, increased inpatient days on Medical/Surgical floors) patients are receiving more hours-per-day of care from RNs and other caregivers. The hospital community is proud that Massachusetts has a highly skilled nursing workforce. Massachusetts RNs are also among the most highly compensated RNs in the country second only to California. Nurses are an essential component of

hospital care, but they are not the only, essential piece to quality patient care. It takes a team to care for patients!

THE REJECTED 1990's CONCEPT OF MANDATED STAFFING RATIOS DOESN'T FIT WITH THE TRANSITION TO AN INTEGRATED, ACCOUNTABLE, CARE DELIVERY MODEL.
Sweeping federal and state healthcare reform efforts are already underway, tying payments to the delivery of high-quality care. Already there is far greater transparency and accountability regarding how care is delivered and its cost. And, transparency and accountability will only increase over time. Overlaying outdated, dysfunctional government-mandated ratios on top of the new integrated care model is inefficient and impractical. It will be a barrier to successful, meaningful systemic reform. In order to receive reimbursements under the new system, hospitals will have to provide quality care in an efficient manner. That means that the full caregiving team will need to be effectively deployed for each patient supported with the proper resources. Mandating a ratio for some members of the team will only interfere with the efficient functioning of the team. At a time when there is a broadly supported effort to become efficient in order to make health care affordable, government mandating ratios or fixed-formulas for staffing will only frustrate efforts to improve care and efficiency. If this misguided approach to care was implemented in the manner the union desires, it would add at least $200 million annually to healthcare premiums in the Commonwealth. Other estimates indicate the impact could be significantly higher. Adding artificial costs to the healthcare delivery system is not in the best interests of patients, employers, state and local governments, or caregivers. Reforming the health care system and providing quality care more efficiently is about each patient being secure in the knowledge that they will receive affordable, quality care it is not about employment security. -30-

You might also like