Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEASURING
SPEED OF LIGHT
Objects of the experiment
Measuring the speed of light using focault's method.
Introduction
The velocity of light in free space is one of the most this time by twice the distance between the hill tops, the
important and intriguing constants of nature. Whether the
speed of light can be determined.
light comes from a laser on a desk top or from a star that
is hurtling away at fantastic speeds, if you measure the However, the speed of light being what it is, and human
velocity of the light, you measure the same constant reaction times being what they are, Galileo was able to
value. In more precise terminology, the velocity of light determine only that the speed of light was far greater than
is independent of the relative velocities of the light source could be measured using his procedure. Although Galileo
and the observer. was unable to provide even an approximate value for the
Furthermore, as Einstein first presented in his Special speed of light, his experiment set the stage for later
Theory of Relativity, the speed of light is critically attempts. It also introduced an important point: to mea-
important in some surprising ways. In particular: sure great velocities accurately, the measurements must
be made over a long distance.
1. The velocity of light establishes an upper limit to the Römer
velocity that may be imparted to any object. The first successful measurement of the velocity of light
2. Objects moving near the velocity of light follow a set was provided by the Danish astronomer Olaf Römer in
1675. Römer based his measurement on observations of
of physical laws drastically different, not only from
the eclipses of one of the moons of Jupiter. As this moon
Newton’s Laws, but from the basic assumptions of
orbits Jupiter, there is a period of time when Jupiter lies
human intuition.
between it and the Earth, and blocks it from view. Römer
With this in mind, it’s not surprising that a great deal of noticed that the duration of these eclipses was shorter
time and effort has been invested in measuring the speed when the Earth was moving toward Jupiter than when the
of light. Some of the most accurate measurements were Earth was moving away. He correctly interpreted this
made by Albert Michelson between 1926 and 1929 using phenomena as resulting from the finite speed of light.
methods very similar to those you will be using with the
this Speed of Light Apparatus. Michelson measured From observations of these eclipses over many years,
the velocity of light in air to be 2.99712 x 108 m/sec. Römer calculated the speed of light to be 2.1 x 108 m/
From this result he deduced the velocity in free space to sec. This value is approximately 1/3 too slow due to an
be 2.99796 x 108 m/sec. inaccurate knowledge at that time of the distances
But Michelson was by no means the first to concern involved. Nevertheless, Römer’s method provided
himself with this measurement. His work was built on a clear evidence that the velocity of light was not
history of ever-improving methodology. infinite, and gave a reasonable estimate of its true
value—not bad for 1675.
Background:Measuring the Velocity of Light Fizeau
Galileo The French scientist Fizeau, in 1849, developed an
The great Italian physicist Galileo, suggested a ingenious method for measuring the speed of light
method for actually measuring the speed of light. over terrestrial distances. He used a rapidly revolving
The method was simple. Two people, call them A and B, cogwheel in front of a light source to deliver the light
take covered lanterns to the tops of hills that are separated to a distant mirror in discrete pulses. The mirror
by a distance of about a mile. First A uncovers her reflected these pulses back toward the cogwheel.
lantern. As soon as B sees A’s light, she uncovers her Depending on the position of the cogwheel when a
own lantern. By measuring the time from when A pulse returned, it would either block the pulse of light
uncovers her lantern until A sees B’s light, then dividing or pass it through to an observer.
1
Speed of Light BS P-III
Fizeau measured the rates of cogwheel rotation that Using this method, Fizeau measured the speed of light to
allowed observation of the returning pulses for carefully be 3.15 x 108 m/sec. This is within a few percent of the
measured distances between the cogwheel and the mirror. currently accepted value.
MF
(Fixed Mirror)
L2 Beamsplitter s L1
Laser
MR Measuring s´
(Rotating Mirror) Microscope
2
Speed of Light BS P-III
Derivation
To begin the derivation, consider a beam of light leaving In the next step in the derivation, it is helpful to think of a
the laser. It follows the path described in the qualitative single, very quick pulse of light leaving the laser. Sup-
description above. That is, first the beam is focused to a pose MR is rotating, and this pulse of light strikes MR
point at s, then reflected from MR to MF, and back to MR. when it is at angle θ, as in Figure 2a. The pulse will then
The beam then returns through the beamsplitter, and is be reflected to point S on MF. However, by the time the
refocused to a point at point s´, where it can be viewed pulse returns to MR, MR will have rotated to a new angle,
through the microscope. This beam of light is reflected say angle θ1. If MR had not been rotating, but had
from a particular point on MF. As the first step in the remained stationary, this returning pulse of light would be
derivation, we must determine how the point of reflection refocused at point s. Clearly, since MR is now in a
on MF relates to the rotational angle of MR. different position, the light pulse will be refocused at a
Figure 2a shows the path of the beam of light, from the different point. We must now determine where that new
laser to MF, when MR is at an angle θ. In this case, the point will be.
angle of incidence of the light path as it strikes MR is also The situation is very much like that shown in Figure 2b,
θ and, since the angle of incidence equals the angle of with one important difference: the beam of light that is
reflection, the angle between the incident and reflected returning to MR is coming from point S on MF, instead of
θ. As shown in the diagram, the pulse of
rays is just 2θ from point S1. To make the situation simpler, it is conve-
light strikes MF at a point that we have labeled S. nient to remove the confusion of the rotating mirror and
Figure 2b shows the path of the pulse of light if it leaves the beam splitter by looking at the virtual images of the
the laser at a slightly later time, when MR is at an angle beam path, as shown in Figure 3.
θ1 = θ + ∆θ
∆θ. The angle of incidence is now equal to
θ1 = θ + ∆θ
∆θ, so that the angle between the incident and MF
S1
∆S
Virtual
reflected rays is just 2θθ1 = 2(θθ + ∆θ
∆θ). This time we label
image of S
the point where the pulse strikes MF as S1. If we define D MF Beamsplitter
as the distance between MF and MR, then the distance MR s
S1 L2
between S and S1 can be calculated: ∆s
∆S
θ1 - 2θ
S1 - S = D(2θ θ + ∆θ
θ) = D[2(θ θ] = 2D∆θ
∆θ) - 2θ ∆θ (EQ1) s1
S
Figure 2a: When MR is at angle θ, the MF
laser beam is reflected to point S on MF. ∆s'
θ S D B A
θ 2θ
Laser Figure 3: Analyzing the Virtual Images
θ
MR
The critical geometry of the virtual images is the same as
for the reflected images. Looking at the virtual images,
the problem becomes a simple application of thin lens
Figure 2b: When MR is at angle θ1, the optics. With MR at angle θ1, point S1 is on the focal axis
laser beam is reflected to point S1 on MF.
of lens L2. Point S is in the focal plane of lens L2, but it is
θ1 = θ+∆θ
S1
a distance ∆S = S1 - S away from the focal axis. From
thin lens theory, we know that an object of height ∆S in
∆θ θ the focal plane of L2 will be focused in the plane of point
θ+∆θ 2(θ+∆θ) ∆S. Here i and o are the distances
s with a height of (-i/o)∆
θ+∆θ of the lens from the image and object, respectively, and
the minus sign corresponds to the inversion of the image.
As shown in Figure 3, reflection from the beam splitter
forms a similar image of the same height.
Figure 2 a,b: The Reflection Point on MF
3
Speed of Light BS P-III
∆s′ = 2DA ∆θ
s′ cw =Position of point image when rotating mirror is
D+B (EQ3)
moving clockwise.
The angle ∆θ depends on the rotational velocity of MR s′ ccw =Position of point image when rotating mirror is
and on the time it takes the light pulse to travel back moving clockwise.
and forth between the mirrors MR and MF, a distance
of 2D. The equation for this relationship is: Equation 6 was derived on the assumption that the image
∆θ = 2D ω (EQ4) point is the result of a single, short pulse of light from the
c laser. But, looking back at equations 1-4, the displace-
where c is the speed of light and ω is the rotational ment of the image point depends only on the difference in
velocity of the mirror in radians per second. (2D/c the angular position of MR in the time it takes for the light
is the time it takes the light pulse to travel from MR to travel between the mirrors. The displacement does not
to MF and back.) depend on the specific mirror angles for any given pulse.
Using equation 4 to replace ∆θ in equation 3 gives: If we think of the continuous laser beam as a series of
infinitely small pulses, the image due to each pulse will
∆s′ = 4AD ω
2 be displaced by the same amount. All these images
(EQ5) displaced by the same amount will, of course, result in a
c(D + B)
single image. By measuring the displacement of this
∆s´ = the displacement of the image point, as viewed
image, the rate of rotation of MR, and the relevant
through the microscope. (∆ ∆s´ = s1 - s; where s is the
distances between components, the speed of light can be
position of the image point when the rotating mirror
measured.
(MR) is stationary, and s1 is the position of the image
point when the rotating mirror is rotating with angular
velocity ω.)
Equation 5 can be rearranged to provide our final
equation for the speed of light:
c= 4AD 2ω (EQ6)
(D + B) ∆s′
2 n π and ∆s′ s′ cw – s′ ccw
But, ω = ____
sec =
where n is number of revolutions per second.
EQ6 becomes:
4
Speed of Light BS P-III
The Equipment
Speed of Light Apparatus
High Speed Rotating Mirror
Assembly
CAUTION
Couplers
REV/SEC
ALLOW MOTOR TO STOP
BEFORE CHANGING DIRECTION
CCW CW
ADJUST
PUSH FOR
MAX REV/SEC
STOP MOTOR
STOP
IF LIT MORE
Measuring
60 SEC LIMIT
THAN 5 SEC.
Fixed Mirror Microscope
Alignment Component
Holders (3) Lens (48 mm FL), and Calibrated
0.5 mW He-Ne Laser Jigs (2)
Lens (252 mm FL) Polarizers (2)
Figure 4: Equipment Included with the OS-9261A Complete Speed of Light Apparatus
1. High Speed Rotating Mirror Assembly lock-screw on the side of the mounting tube and slide the
microscope up or down within the tube.
The High Speed Rotating Mirror comes with its own
power supply and digital display. The mirror is flat to In addition to the microscope and micrometer, the
within 1/4 wavelength. It’s supported by high speed ball micrometer stage also contains the beamsplitter. The
bearings, mounted in a protective housing, and driven lever on the side of the stage is used to adjust the angle of
by a DC motor with a drive belt. A plastic lock-screw the beamsplitter. When the lever points directly down,
lets you hold the mirror in place during the alignment the beamsplitter is at a forty-five degree angle.
procedure. 3. Fixed Mirror
An optical detector and the digital display provide The Fixed Mirror is a spherical mirror with a radius of
measurements of mirror rotation to within 0.1% or 1 rev/ curvature of 13.5 meters. It is mounted to a stand and has
sec. The display and the controls for mirror rotation are separate x and y alignment screws.
on the front panel of the power supply. Rotation is 4. Optics Bench
reversible and the rate is continuously variable from 100
to 1,000 rev/sec. In addition, holding down the MAX The 1.0 meter long Optics Bench provides a flat, level
REV/SEC button will bring the rotation speed quickly to surface for aligning the optical components. The bench is
its maximum value at approximately 1,500 rev/sec. equipped with a one meter scale, four leveling screws,
and a magnetic top surface. The "fence", a raised edge on
➤ CAUTION: Before turning on the motor for the back of the bench, provides a guide for aligning
the rotating mirror, carefully read the cautionary components along the optical axis.
notices in the section of this manual entitled 5. Laser with the Alignment Bench
“Making the Measurement”. The 0.5 mW, TEM mode, random polarization laser has
an output wavelength of 632.8 nm. The Alignment Bench
2. Measuring Microscope
attaches to the Optics Bench for precise, stable position-
The 90X microscope is mounted on a micrometer stage ing of the laser.
for precise measurements of the displacement of the 6. Alignment Jigs (2)
image point. Measurements are most easily made by These jigs mount magnetically to the Optics Bench.
visually centering the image point on the microscope Each has a 2 mm diameter hole that is used to align the
cross-hairs before and after the displacement. By noting laser beam.
the change in the micrometer setting, the displacement
can be resolved to within 0.005 mm.
To focus the cross-hairs, slide the eyepiece up or down in
the microscope. To focus the microscope, loosen the
5
Speed of Light BS P-III
6
Speed of Light BS P-III
MR Alignment Jigs
17 cm
Leveling Screws: Use to aim the laser
Figure 8: Using the Alignment Jigs to Align the Laser beam through the alignment jigs.
3. The laser must be aligned so the beam strikes the cen- 5. Adjust the position of the front of the laser so the
ter of the Rotating Mirror (MR). Two alignment jigs beam passes directly through the hole in the first
are provided for this purpose. Place one jig at each jig. (Use the two front leveling screws to adjust the
end of the Optics Bench as shown in Figure 8, with height. Adjust the position of the laser on the Laser
the edges flush against the fence of the bench. When Alignment Bench to adjust the lateral position.)
properly placed, the holes in the jigs define a straight Then adjust the height and position of the rear of
line that is parallel to the axis of the Optics Bench. the laser so the beam passes directly through the
4. Turn on the Laser. hole in the second jig.
Reflected laser beam
Figure 9: Aligning the Rotating Mirror (MR) Hole in Alignment Jig
Paper
15. Bring the cross-hairs of the microscope into focus by tus is properly aligned, you will see the point im-
sliding the microscope eyepiece up and down. age through the microscope. Focus until the image
16. Focus the microscope by loosening the lock-screw is as sharp as pos-
and sliding the scope up and down. If the appara- sible.
L2 1 or 2°
8
Speed of Light BS P-III
Troubleshooting..
Once you have the microscope focused, it may still be Once the mirror begins to rotate, it is safe to look into the
difficult to obtain a good spot. There may be several other microscope without the polarizers. You will notice that
lights visible in the microscope besides the spot reflected your carefully aligned pattern has changed: now the entire
from the fixed mirror. field is covered with a random interference pattern, and
Stray interference pattern
there is a bright band down the center of the field. Ignore
the interference pattern; there’s nothing you can do about
it anyway. The band is the image of the laser when, once
each rotation, the mirror reflects it into the microscope
beamsplitter. This is also unavoidable.
Actual spot
9
Speed of Light BS P-III
B = the distance between lens L2 and the rotating mir ror (MR)
=_______________________________________
=_______________________________________
=_______________________________________
Result:
%Error=_______________________________
10
Speed of Light BS P-III CMY
Accuracy
Precise alignment of the optical components and careful However, the optical components are designed for
measurement are, of course, essential for an accurate optimal focusing of the image point at 13.5 meters (this is
measurement using this equipment. Beyond this, the the radius of curvature of MF). Image focusing is not a
main factor affecting accuracy is the distance between the significant problem as long as the distance between the
fixed and rotating mirrors. mirrors is within about 15 meters. At larger distances the
As mentioned in the alignment procedure, the optimum intensity and focus of the image point begins to drop, and
distance between MR and MF is from 10 to 15 meters. measurement and alignment are hampered.
Within this range, accuracy within 5% is readily obtain- Typical sample data taken in our lab gives values for c
able. If space is a problem, the distance between the that are within 1.5 - 2.5% of accepted values.
mirrors can be reduced to as little as 1 meter and propor-
tional reduction in accuracy will result.
➤ IMPORTANT: All mirrors and lenses may
In general, longer distances provide greater accuracy. MR be cleaned with lens tissue, except the spherical
rotates farther as the light travels between the mirrors, and mirror (MF). It has a delicate aluminized front
the image deflection is correspondingly greater. Greater surface and should only be cleaned with alcohol
deflections reduce the percentage of measurement error. and a soft cloth. Do not use any cleaning com-
pound that contains ammonia (such as Windex);
the ammonia will attack the aluminum surface.
11