One of the favorite accusations of those who teach and preach the lie of human free will is that

if Calvinism is true, we're all just robots. The first thing you need to be aware of is that most of what they say has the persona of a fact and a detail of well understood truth, but is in truth simply a delusion and paranoia that results from a separation from God as Word, Jesus Christ. We're being accused of both attaining what they is possible, but is in fact not possible at all and of not doing what they say is possible, and is not possible at all. First let's examine the system out of which the accusation arose that God being God and not forcing free will on us makes us mere robots. Some questions: 1. Why would it be of advantage to someone else for you to be deceived that no new birth should or can take place unless through their priestly system and that any other belief system than theirs would automatically dismiss the opportunity for you to feel anything in your heart that you knew was not forced? That question answers itself on one level: because they need people to pay money for religion in some manner and they want you to be one of those people. But there is also the fact that that is their best honesty and they really think they are making an honest living off of being righteous. 2. Why would they send you off in search of a proof of having had an autonomous, self-derived feeling and tell you that without such a proof, you should hate God because the lack of such a proof means God made you a robot? Why are they accusing us of not looking for and supposedly continually performing proofs of autonomy when we are commanded to do the gospel as God does it through us because we are one with God in Jesus Christ? 3. What are they saying a robot actually is? 4. Who is really trying to produce robots? Free will based religions, religions that are founded and completely encapsulated in the lie of human free will, which are all religions other than true Christianity, cannot survive without: 1. a set of rules to live by as an ideal model of behavior, 2. the actual reality that no one can follow any ideal model of behavior perfectly 3. a forgiveness paradigm that while not taking the worshiper out of the entire cycle of break-ruleask-forgiveness-get-forgiveness-done-to-them-break-the-rule-again, makes them feel they have a fresh start in the same system while retaining free will and educating themselves over time in its best use for personal advantage 4. the lie that you could be a righteous robot, you just don't want to 5. an incomplete cycle of forgiveness going on in perpetuity, as each sin is done before the last sin has had time to go through a complete cycle of forgiveness and their adherents are deceived that feeling of an incomplete forgiveness is the same as guilt before God, rather than the result of lies not being able to perform truth. They have their adherents trying to escape a cage that does not exist, but are fully deceived does exist

and that lack of success at escaping what they are deceived is real the adherents confound with guilt. The disappointment with failure is confounded with guilt because they actually believe the lie is real and ought to succeed. There is an overt attempt to emotionally educate the adherent into not recognizing when forgiveness is said to have been done and to keep the confusion ever-present. They are saying something is possible that is in fact not possible, and accusing you of not having proved you have done it; yet saying they can forgive you for not having done it and give you wisdom to find out how to do it in the future if you keep on in their system. They are not saying it for a moment or two, or even in one or two ways. They have said it for thousands of years in countless ways and accused for thousands of years on that basis. Lies beget other lies to make the first lies seem to make sense in the face of reality. Plainly, free will based religions need to instill the further lie that robotic behaviors as perfectly adhering to a set of rules are possible and the desired norm of the particular religion and that life in the religion is a progression toward such robot behavior which they call perfection. No one can be a robot. You cannot do rule keeping perfectly no matter what the rules are. That is because the human will is not free. God proved that to make that explicit point: God tells you the perfect rules that you are to perform and to live, as only God as perfect can do, and you cannot perform them. The perfect giver of rules gives you perfect rules. Yet He proved He knew you could not perform them at the same time when he gave them to you, before you could have any understanding of having failed at keeping them, before you had an opportunity to keep them because simultaneous with the Ten Commandments, he gives the rules for the sacrificial system. The sacrificial system was specifically for those instances of the rules being broken and had their application to everyone. Yet not even the sacrificial system was perfectly, that is to say, robotically performed and they thought among themselves that such a breech was acceptable because of events that had befallen them from the hand of God:
Leveticus 10:14-20 And the wave breast and heave shoulder shall ye eat in a clean place; thou, and thy sons, and thy daughters with thee: for they be thy due, and thy sons' due, which are given out of the sacrifices of peace offerings of the children of Israel. The heave shoulder and the wave breast shall they bring with the offerings made by fire of the fat, to wave it for a wave offering before the LORD; and it shall be thine, and thy sons' with thee, by a statute for ever; as the LORD hath commanded. And Moses diligently sought the goat of the sin offering, and, behold, it was burnt: and he was angry with Eleazar and Ithamar, the sons of Aaron which were left alive, saying, Wherefore have ye not eaten the sin offering in the holy place, seeing it is most holy, and God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the LORD? Behold, the blood of it was not brought in within the holy place: ye should indeed have eaten it in the holy place, as I commanded. And Aaron said unto Moses, Behold, this day have they offered their sin offering and their burnt offering before the LORD; and such things have befallen me: and if I had eaten the sin offering to day, should it have been accepted in the sight of the LORD? And when Moses heard that, he was content.

Neither the rules nor the sacrificial system for when the rules were broken were followed perfectly, thus it was necessary for the priests to be atoned for as well and that even ceremony and rules of atonement were breached immediately after they received them and when they knew them perfectly.

The adherent of the system is doing all they 'can', having been given a lie of free will and looking at the Word of God as an equivalent to non-creating speech ( because of the fall of man ) in which free will at least seems to make some sense, and after having done their part of the system, the worshiper part, the priest was supposed to do the priest stuff and complete the whole cycle of that particular day of Life in The Religion. Yet not only was the worshiper part not followed exactly, thus necessitating the sacrifice to begin with, but even the sacrificial part, which was the job of the priest was just as full of error. Note the similarity particularly with Roman Catholicism; not only are the Roman Catholics not doing their own system perfectly, the priests are in the back room raping children and the rest of the Church is covering it up to pretend somebody somewhere is actually getting the results the religion claimed to deliver. Not only is God not allowing robotic behavior, he is doing so by the specific means of thwarting the notion of a free will at the same time of having implanted the hope of a free will in the wicked. The purpose of the exercise was not merely to frustrate man, even though that was indeed part of it as a display of power, ( God forces man to tread in vanity for a time, even the elect before our new birth in Jesus Christ ) but it was to bring to the attention why men could not perform the rules perfectly: how God was thwarting their desires for them to serve Him perfectly. God is openly demonstrating it. Man has an enemy that is not God and does not know it. The point of not having a free will and yet hoping to please God perfectly is to demonstrate the problem is not only you. You have an enemy that God is pointing out and that enemy is the living creature that is sin. The first thing men want when they see God exists is a way to both placate Him and to be rid of Him. When God says you have to do this and that, they want a way to do what He said that is minimally invasive to their other desires. They want a system of life that has included doing what God said on automatic. That is their definition of a robot when they cast the accusation: someone who can do God's laws and specifically their interpretation of God's laws automatically, and therefore never needs their forgiveness paradigms no matter what other desires you have. At the same time they have you wishing for the proof in your life of having had an autonomous emotion: a self-derived feeling exclusive from the rest of reality. Because at all costs the non-creating speech that is the mind of fallen man is seeking to mimic creation and the next emotion is the best it claim as having manufactured. But emotions don't occur as isolated from all else: they are produced by interaction of spirits. The supposed isolated autonomous emotion would not be proof of being an individual or even of free will, but of supreme ego as a lying spirit taking over the identity of the feeler. Note that they actually perceive in a negative light what they themselves seek to instill in their victims as a positive: automatic performance of God's laws. It isn't so much they are trying to avoid robotic behavior, indeed they are trying to instill it as we shall see, but that they don't want anyone else to have succeeded and in their delusion of such a thing being possible, are afraid someone else has. God will not allow any of that for his elect. What you are witnessing when men say Calvinism makes men and women robots is a phobia against a figment of the delusions of those who accuse Calvinism on the one hand, and on the other a loud protest against the behavior they perform themselves as camouflage for the fact they are doing it to all they can as fast as they can. The system of the lie of free will itself is really an attempt by something to make man think he ought ideally to be a robot and perform whatever desire he and she has immediately while seeing the origin of

that desire in a non-creating determinism that is mistaken for God's Creating Determinism and cannot be understood and so remain unquestioned. What they teach is a provocation to wish to be a robot so that a permanent escape from guilt would be had and an accusation that if you really, really wanted to, you could be a robot in order to keep instilling the very same guilt. It is witchcraft. You supposedly are just not trying hard enough to be that ideal righteous robot they accuse of actually being. The very failure to be the righteous robot and yet the lie that you could be one if you tried hard enough is the only power the false religious system has: the power of the lie over you depends explicitly on your failure to be successful at a deception. Those things are done in order to invoke a supposed logical need for the forgiveness paradigm that is, of course, administered by priests. They manufactured the guilt in you in order to reap the reward of whatever they say the forgiveness paradigm will cost you as if it isn't costing you the time of your life. The priests are producing in the adherents the very behavior and desires which require the deeds of the priest and doing so as close to being a robot as possible. They are producing cycles of behavior that are clearly repetitive and designed to be repetitive in vain so that the whole system goes on in perpetuity. Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox, Mormonism, Scientology, Jehovah's Witness, Free Will Baptist, Free Will Presbyterians, Episcopalians, Anglicans, Lutherans, ( in other words, most of what is called protestantism), as well as Taoism, Shintoism, animism, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism are of that same lie. False Christianity and Islam are more obviously robotic systems than Jainism, Taoism, Shintoism, animism, Hinduism and Buddhism, but all are expressly predicated to produce automatic feelings about events so as to control behavior in robotic cycles of idealized rule breaking and thus the need for forgiveness. The religions that depend on what they call karma instead of sin have different strategies to cover up the manipulation than false Christianity. Instead of saying certain acts are proof that the beginning the new cycle of break-rule-get forgiveness-break rule has already begun, and saying those acts are called sin, karmic religions rely on a much more general, and thus more all-invasive principle of wrong doing that is in a symbiotic relationship with the other religions that surround them. They depend on their adherents to get their notions of right and wrong from other religions and then to apply the notion of building up guilt over long periods of time minus the rigors of the false Christian forgiveness paradigm. While as a strategy, it lends them a certain flexibility, that very flexibility exacerbates the guilt: the old adherent of a karmic religion isn't just guilty in one set of religious rules, he or she is guilty in three or four as they have sought to escape the guilt of one by moving to another as that moral guide. They are ten times the robot of a western false Christian system searching for a new forgiveness paradigm to cycle through. Thus they are famous for superstitious, repetitive behaviors much more than the West other than buying and selling. The more relaxed attitude and regulations of the forgiveness paradigm by the karmic priests and the less powerful type of forgiveness paradigm of karmic religions leads to a more complete control over behavior, which gives the priest more leisure as they control the mind of the people from afar more completely and the adherent to the religion is at all times thinking of karma as a ruling paradigm in their life which they call luck. The forgiveness paradigm is supposedly what brings Good luck as it hopefully forces good behavior to build good karma. In addition, because there are very little concrete acts that are forbidden, the life of the adherent is consumed in trying to persuade Luck to be on their

side rather than forgiveness per se. pride is compounded, not diminished. They don't see a forgiveness paradigm as forgiveness per se, but as balancing of karma by forced grace from the god. The adherent is then relentlessly attacked by a guilty conscience and spiritual enemies they must deny exist but only ascribe to bad behavior in a previous life by themselves. The behaviors are then deceitfully seen to be the product of a machine ( the person ) capable of perfect actions that is free willed and is a combination of the emotions and intellect, which is merely pressured by various demons and demigods to do good or bad acts. No matter the various pressures, the karma accrues to the individual expressly because the individual is idealized as free willed and could have done the ideal model of behavior perfectly but just didn't want to with enough vigor. So no matter what version of free will based religion one is within, even atheism, the ruling paradigm is: its all your own fault and therefore you must pay somebody something for your breaking of the ideal model of behavior and your failure to be a righteous robot. In western religions you pay immediately in this life. In karmic religions, you pay later in the next life and in this life for the deeds of a idealized previous life. Gambling as such repetitive behavior in karmic religions then is the spiritual equivalent to buying in religions based on sin being a more concrete act but only an act: it supposedly proves the will is free by supposedly displaying choice and the outcome is dependent on previous free willed actions and a noncreating determinism to know whether a good or bad result has been attained, and that result is a idealized piece of knowledge pertaining to one's own personal goodness. The result becomes the next compass point to know where one is on the road to being a righteous robot. It is supposed proof of freedom, but a freedom that is to be condemned or praised by comparison to the various religious rules of their religion let them know if another cycle of break-the-rule-get-forgiveness-break-the-rule or break-the-rule-accrue bad karma-do appeasement to gods -hopefully-get-good-karma has already begun. Note the implied non-creating determinism in the whole of false religion: you are only said to have a free will within the confines of a large determinism that is outside your control but which is not growing or bringing any new thing into your environment: 1. the rules themselves 2. the forgiveness or karmic paradigm in which you must participate. 3. Your participation as a whole ..the fact of your own existence I have said non-creating determinism because part of the scare tactic of false religion is to keep you blind to the ideal it has of you being its righteous robot while it accuses the true Christian of having obtained that robot status and thus not needing the false religion at all, and thus not needing the priests of it at all. When those defend the lie of human free will as if it were not a lie speak of determinism, they are not speaking of God's per-destination and election, even though that is what they wish you to be deceived that is exactly what they are speaking of. The term they use that they call Determinism is only meant by them to be understood within the limits and ideals of no new creation ever taking place. They don't call it non-creating determinism because they don't believe there is such a thing as new creation going on all the time and thus they would be distinguishing one determinism with what they don't believe exists. They are not kidding that they believe non-creating determinism is just the only determinism and needs no more descriptive terms than what they portray. What you are witnessing in those who use the word 'determinism' as a blanket term to supposedly equal

God's predetermination and election is their best honesty. They are not intentionally lying and even when they obviously dodge and swerve when confronted by the difference they are lying to protect the underlying best honesty they have ..that is a deception. They are deceived and unwittingly in the service of protecting that living spirit that IS the deception: anti-Christ. Everything that anti-Christ says about itself, they say about their ideology as the speech they have gotten in the Fall of Man. In order to make their deceptions appear to be truth, they need a stable determinism in which no new creation ever takes place, nothing is unexplainable, the rules stay the rules to produce known and understood emotions and in which you particularly stay the same creature you already are in the speech that God confounded at Babel; all that to make it appear you must stay in the larger ideology they have surrounded you with. Their overall deception has to seem to account for God's actual new creation and thus it begins to lie and is set against itself. A non-creating determinism fills that niche need of seeming to explain total reality minus any new creation but inclusive of the concept of God very nicely and is further used as the foundation for the lie of human free will. In that deception, you stay the same, the fundamental definitions of their system supposedly describe metas that are beyond anyone's control but which never change,.. the whole system chugs along smoothly. While everyone keep saying to everyone else that they have free will, no one is expected to get outside of what a free willed can do: the lie becomes the warm blanket that protects the very failure it forces and necessitates its own guilt as proof of being included and thus being social. New creation breaks the system and thus non-creating speech itself is filled with words like 'mystery', 'paradox', 'unknown' and the like as a supposed natural and unavoidable part of the landscape to cover over the new creation going on. New creation is the obstacles the lie of free will loathes because it always comes between the initial recognition of having had a desire, and in the landscape of expectation between the desire seen and the desire accomplished and complicates that landscape as producing, among other things, obstacles to satisfaction of desires that have already been recognized. Yet in Christ, of course, we have no robot status nor can have because we have God creating at all times, but creating in a way that His Word brings us to be what he has intended us to be and guides us through temptations to merely seek desire for its own sake. In God, we grow but grow on a specified path of Life in Christ and in which the new creation is a planned part of the landscape. God creates specifically and exclusively by the means of His Word. He lives in us, creates and grows us and creates others through us. What has been determined to come to pass by God will come to pass. But the method of bringing it to pass is new creation, not a static environment in which a free will is possible. Because new creation changes the environment and changes us without our consent, there is no chance for a free will because of the changes. Even after new birth, the new creation is changing the environment, and changing us. There isn't even time for what could be called a learning cycle in order to know what to do with an idealized free will, nor can a simple reactionism as instinct be said to exist because the new creation is new, never seen before truth: the new creature in Jesus Christ has no experience with things other than themselves and God ; has no experience with what is newly created any more than the reprobate. God of course perfectly understands the deceptions those whom he chooses to save and to re-create as new creatures in Jesus Christ and Speaks to us to remind us of Himself, His character and that a lot of what we are looking at in Christ is outright new creation:
Isaiah 48:1-13 Hear ye this, O house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the waters of Judah, which swear by the name of the LORD, and make mention of the God of Israel, but not in truth, nor in righteousness. For

they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel; The LORD of hosts is his name. I have declared the former things from the beginning; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I shewed them; I did them suddenly, and they came to pass. Because I knew that thou art obstinate, and thy neck is an iron sinew, and thy brow brass; I have even from the beginning declared it to thee; before it came to pass I shewed it thee: lest thou shouldest say, Mine idol hath done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, hath commanded them. Thou hast heard, see all this; and will not ye declare it? I have shewed thee new things from this time, even hidden things, and thou didst not know them. They are created now, and not from the beginning; even before the day when thou heardest them not; lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them. Yea, thou heardest not; yea, thou knewest not; yea, from that time that thine ear was not opened: for I knew that thou wouldest deal very treacherously, and wast called a transgressor from the womb. For my name's sake will I defer mine anger, and for my praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off. Behold, I have refined thee, but not with silver; I have chosen thee in the furnace of affliction. For mine own sake, even for mine own sake, will I do it: for how should my name be polluted? and I will not give my glory unto another. Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last. Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together.

God clearly makes reference to the fact of the one whom he is saving not having Christ as the Word of God prior to that salvation by pointing out that the one being shown the power of God would lie against God if God allowed it..They are created now, and not from the beginning; even before the
day when thou heardest them not; lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them. Yea, thou heardest not; yea, thou knewest not; yea, from that time that thine ear was not opened: for I knew that thou wouldest deal very treacherously, and wast called a transgressor from the womb.

Reactionism in non-creating speech as 'instinct' and 'the subconscious' assumes a creature that knows what it needs in a static environment and seeks to get those things or keep those things without even the idealized decisions of a free will. New creation does away with even that opportunity. New things are being created at all times, to include brothers and sisters in Christ. God created warmth and cold, joy and sorrow, all of which are in Christ and were created exclusively via Christ. The lie of instinct and 'the subconscious' is then plainly understood as being used by those who invoke it to be nothing more than a synonym for 'a free will that looks out for itself' as opposed to the one who ideally has it. Yet even that is a lie and revealed to be a lie by new creation in Jesus Christ. It is not known to be a lie in simply hearing a rumor of new creation somewhere else. The lie of instinct within a non-creating determinism and indeed entire non-creating speech is the same as the lie of trying to prove free will exists by saying random events take place: the word random is being used as a synonym for you don't control it and what they are really saying when they say random events prove determinism can't be true is: because we cannot control what happens to us that means we have free will ..which of course is nonsensical and self-invalidating. Not having a free will then in no way makes one a robot and is not the tyranny that those who are inside free will based religions claim. Knowing you don't have a free will and you live inside God's

creating determinism gets you out of the tyranny of their guilt cycles, out of the tyranny of their control of forgiveness paradigms that do not work to clear the conscience and are intended to not clear the conscience, out of robotic behavior cycles and the desire to be perfected in them as a robot. Further, the lie of free will manufactures in those who are deceived by it the further lie that same perfect behavior they will achieve one day will enable them to make many decisions and those decisions will be proof of their righteousness each time. The time between such idealized decisions is thought by them to be reduced over time until they do righteousness without any 'gaps'. They call that being smart. Smartness as a concept is then seen to be an extension of the lie of free will and further, the faster one makes decisions, the faster one is made holy and thus one is proved to supposedly be smarter. Those very people who openly gloat about supposedly having free will as opposed to their straw man of non-creating determinism and who claim to be experts in that argument that sets free will as an opposite to their term 'determinism' as a supposed blanket over all of reality, then perceive robots to be smart and even smarter than human beings based on decisions per second analogies. The intellectual and emotional mathematics that constitutes what is called by them the decision making process is shown to them to be more easily and better performed ...by the very thing they were warned against in their false religion that hated Christ and hated new creation: a robot. New creation in Jesus Christ by hearing the Word of God is then the enemy: 1. of the lie of free will and its false forgiveness paradigms and the evil desires it seeks to seduce us into, 2. the enemy of the slavery of the cycle of vain to be hopeless, wherein one is made vain and proud by the thought of supposed personal power and then cast into hopelessness by the falsely perceived personal power first of other people and masses of other people and then by simple machines 3. the enemy of man thinking to need to be a robot to escape guilt 4. men thinking they need to live in an environment in which no new resources were ever created so that the will could remain free and then struggle with other men over those idealized scarce resources. In short, the lie of free will and its non-creating determinism is the champion of everything Satan stands for, and new creation in Jesus Christ is against everything Satan stands for, to include the hope of being a righteous robot, to include bowing down to the work of your own hands on the premise it makes more decisions that you per second and those supposed decisions are the proofs of intelligence. The affinity for some to portray robots as decision makers rather than machines that turn portions of themselves off and on very fast if they are programmed to do so by human beings is the same as thinking that living a deceived life in programmed guilt over not being a righteous robot and thinking it genius to know that the break rule-get forgiveness-break rule cycle has already begun and is even multitasking over many sins that are in some portion of that cycle in parallel. Even if an escape from the cult of free will as an organization is made, such as leaving the Roman Catholic, Methodist, Mormon, Scientology or Free Will Baptist system, the adherent, minus actual and non-metaphorical new birth in Jesus Christ seeks for the rest of their life to do the system minus the hypocrisy of the priest caste; still being deceived the whole was a valid belief system that was simply badly presented and done by others. They can be upset over the pedophilia, greed, duplicity and homosexuality of the Romanists, the homosexuality of the Methodists, the greed and hypocrisy of

Scientology, the pedophilia and polygamy of the Mormons, the freemasonry of the Free Will Baptists that excuses anything and everything to make money and such, the same in the free will Presbyterian circles and walk away from organized religion per se. But the hard core belief in free will and law keeping has been instilled and has indeed become the public paradigm out of which evil notions of fair play and morality and laws to enforce those notions have arisen. If you can be a righteous robot, you will never need forgiveness. But you'll still need new creation in Jesus Christ. But since you can't be that robot even if you wanted and you can't recreate yourself in Christ, Satan will always have you as a victim of false guilt as long as you believe you have free will and think the opposite of free will is non-creating determinism. And you won't be able to stop believing you have free will and hoping to obtain robot status without being born again in Jesus Christ by hearing the Word of God. Those who hurl the accusation against Calvinism that Calvinism makes one a robot are simply afraid they will be found out that robotic behavior by adherents of the lie of human free will are exactly what they are after as their definition of perfection. Do not be deceived. You cannot be a robot and were never pre-destined to be one. You do not have a free will and all the lies of the lie of free will were never true. Knowing that it is impossible to be a robot in truth and the evidence that you cannot be a robot is everpresent before you such that other people are using that evidence against you to instill guilt over that failure, let's look again at the lie of the autonomous feeling that supposedly arises in some people out of their idealized innate goodness and whose behavior you are supposed to mimic. Those people are set up as heroes of the free will ideology and the supposed proof that free will produces good behavior. You are accused day and night of not volunteering enough, not giving enough away, not walking away from your inheritance in Christ to serve the lie of free will. The lie of that type of sacrifice is based on the lie that love is a self-generated power and with which you are to dispense to all; on the myth of the autonomous feeling that if you have, you must not control but simply 'be': in short, a free will that serves itself instead of serving you. First you are told that God forced free will on you and that you cannot escape having it as a default of being human. Then you are told that if you fail to do certain rules as ideal models of behavior perfectly, you need forgiveness; that you need the forgiveness from something because you failed at being a righteous robot. Then you are told because you have free will, that free will itself must manufacture another ideal model of behavior called love and yet not control it at all, but just do it at all times. That's a lying spirit, not an abstract. That is overt and obvious worship of the lie of free will for the sake of piling on all the false guilt possible that the adherent feels as fear of not satisfying a false deity that lives in you and everyone else who is deceived they have free will. The lie of free will that forces you to keep attempting to be a robot and feeling guilty if you do not, that keeps making you fail at the idealized love, is not a worship of Jesus Christ. It is the enemy of Christ and the enemy of love. No matter where you go, there it is..because it is in your flesh making war against you and others and in the flesh of other people making war against you and them. Here is the fear of God: God has caused you to be deceived you have free will and to hope in lies that destroy you and make you the deadly enemies of each other. At the same time, He has sent His Word to deliver those whom he has pre-destined to go through new creation and grow in him in Jesus Christ, the

Word of God and hardens the heart of those whom he has pre-destined to have His wrath performed on them.
2 Thessalonians 2:10-17 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle. Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace, Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen