Professional Documents
Culture Documents
r
2
22
21 d
2
E
2
m
12
E
1
r
11
r
22
r
2
12
21 d
6
G
12
a
11
r
11
a
22
r
22
DT
b
11
r
11
b
22
r
22
DM 1
where E
1
, E
2
, m
12
and G
12
are the in-plane elastic
orthotropic properties of a unidirectional lamina.
The subscript 1 denotes the longitudinal (ber)
direction, and 2 denotes the transverse (matrix)
direction. a
11
and a
22
are the coecients of thermal
expansion in the longitudinal and transverse direc-
tions, respectively. b
11
and b
22
are the coecients
of hygroscopic expansion in the longitudinal and
transverse directions, respectively. DT and DM are
the dierences of temperature and moisture content
with respect to the corresponding reference values.
The stress tensor r corresponds to the average stress
tensor over a representative volume that is assumed
to be much larger than the diameter of a ber.
The set of scalar damage variables d
1
,d
2
, and d
6
ensure that the composite ply maintains the original
planes of material symmetry, regardless of the dam-
age state of the material. The damage variable d
1
is
associated with longitudinal (ber) failure, whereas
d
2
is the damage variable associated with transverse
matrix cracking and d
6
is a damage variable inu-
enced by longitudinal and transverse cracks.
To ensure the thermodynamically irreversibility
of the damage process, the rate of change of the
complementary free energy
_
G minus the externally
supplied work to the solid at constant strains,
_ r : e, must not be negative:
_
G _ r : e P0 2
This inequality corresponds to the positiveness of
the dissipated energy and has to be fullled by any
constitutive model (Malvern, 1969). Expanding the
inequality in terms of the stress tensor and damage
variables gives:
oG
or
e
_ _
: _ r
oG
od
1
_
d
1
oG
od
2
_
d
2
oG
od
6
_
d
6
P0 3
Since the stresses are variables that can vary freely,
the expression in the parenthesis must be equal to
zero to ensure positive dissipation of mechanical en-
ergy. Therefore, the strain tensor is equal to the
derivative of the complementary free energy density
with respect to the stress tensor:
e
oG
or
H : r aDT bDM 4
The lamina compliance tensor can be represented in
Voigt notation as:
H
o
2
G
or
2
1
1 d
1
E
1
m
21
E
2
0
m
12
E
1
1
1 d
2
E
2
0
0 0
1
1 d
6
G
12
_
_
_
_
5
The closure of transverse cracks under load reversal,
also known as the unilateral eect, is taken into ac-
count by dening four damage variables associated
with longitudinal and transverse damage. To deter-
mine the active damage variables, it is necessary to
dene the longitudinal and transverse damage
modes as follows:
P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908 901
d
1
d
1
hr
11
i
jr
11
j
d
1
hr
11
i
jr
11
j
d
2
d
2
hr
22
i
jr
22
j
d
2
hr
22
i
jr
22
j
6
where hxi is the McCauley operator dened as
hxi := (x + jxj)/2.
The present model tracks damage caused by ten-
sion loads (d
+
) separately from damage caused by
compression loads (d
Y
C
cos
2
a
0
10
The components of the eective stress tensor in the
coordinate system associated with the rotation of
the bers are calculated as
~ r
m
22
~ r
11
sin
2
u
C
~ r
22
cos
2
u
C
2j~ r
12
j sin u
C
cos u
C
~ r
m
12
~ r
22
~ r
11
sinu
C
cos u
C
j~ r
12
jcos
2
u
C
sin
2
u
C
11
where the absolute value of the shear stress is taken
because the misalignment angle can be positive or
negative.
The misalignment angle (u
C
) is determined using
standard shear and longitudinal compression
strengths, S
L
and X
C
(Davila et al., 2005):
u
C
arctan
1
1 4
S
L
X
C
g
L
_ _
S
L
X
C
_
2
S
L
X
C
g
L
_ _
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
It should be noted that the LaRC03 failure crite-
rion, derived to predict the onset of damage in lam-
inated composites, calculates the misalignment
angle as a function of the applied stress. The
LaRC03 failure criterion is modied here assuming
a constant misalignment angle, corresponding to the
rotation of the bers at failure under pure longitudi-
nal compression. This modication of LaRC03 fail-
ure criterion ensures that /
1
is a monotonic
increasing function under any state of proportional
loading.
It should be pointed out that two criteria are used
in LaRC03 for ber kinking: Eq. (9) for ~ r
m
22
6 0 and
a second equation for ~ r
m
22
P0. However, the omis-
sion of the second equation results in a minor loss
of accuracy because the equation is the same as
Eq. (13.a) with the stresses transformed into the
misaligned coordinate frame.
3.2.3. Transverse fracture perpendicular to the
laminate mid-plane (a
0
= 0)
Transverse matrix cracks perpendicular to the
mid-plane of the ply, i.e. with a
0
= 0 (Fig. 1c),
are created by a combination of in-plane shear stres-
ses and transverse tensile stresses, or in-plane shear
stresses and small transverse compressive stresses.
These conditions are represented by the following
LaRC04 failure criterion:
/
2
1 g
~ r
22
Y
T
g
~ r
22
Y
T
_ _
2
~ r
12
S
L
_ _
2
_
if ~ r
22
P0
1
S
L
hj ~ r
12
j g
L
~ r
22
i if ~ r
22
< 0
_
_
13
where g is the fracture toughness ratio dened as:
g
G
Ic
G
IIc
.
3.2.4. Transverse fracture with a
0
= 53
The LaRC04 matrix failure criterion for high
transverse compressive stresses, Fig. 1d, consists of
a quadratic interaction between the eective shear
stresses acting on the fracture plane:
/
2
~s
T
eff
S
T
_ _
2
~s
L
eff
S
L
_ _
2
if ~ r
22
< 0 14
where the eective stresses ~s
T
eff
and ~s
L
eff
are computed
as (Pinho et al., 2004)
~s
T
eff
h~ r
22
cosa
0
sina
0
g
T
cosa
0
coshi
~s
L
eff
hcosa
0
j~ r
12
j g
L
~ r
22
cosa
0
sinhi
15
The sliding angle h is calculated as (Pinho et al.,
2004)
h arctan
j~ r
12
j
~ r
22
sina
0
_ _
16
The transverse shear strength and transverse friction
coecient can be approximated as
S
T
Y
C
cosa
0
sina
0
cosa
0
tan2a
0
_ _
g
T
1
tan2a
0
17
The fracture angle a
0
is approximately 53 in uniax-
ial compression. With increasing amounts of in-
plane shear, the fracture angle diminishes up to
about 40 and then abruptly switches to 0. To nd
the correct angle of fracture, a maximization of the
LaRC03-04 failure criteria as a function of a should
be performed. However, in order to improve the
computational eciency of the present model, it is
assumed that the fracture angle can only take one
of two discrete values: 0 or 53.
The elastic domain in the ~ r
11
, ~ r
22
, ~ r
12
space rep-
resented by the LaRC04 failure criteria is shown in
Fig. 2.
3.3. Dissipation
The rate of energy dissipation per unit volume
resulting from the evolution of damage is given by
P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908 903
N
oG
od
1
_
d
1
oG
od
2
_
d
2
oG
od
6
_
d
6
Y
1
_
d
1
Y
2
_
d
2
Y
6
_
d
6
P0 18
The form of the complementary free energy dened
in Eq. (1) ensures that the thermodynamic forces
(Y
M
) conjugated to their respective damage vari-
ables (d
M
) are always positive:
Y
1
oG
od
1
r
2
11
21 d
1
2
E
1
P0
Y
2
oG
od
2
r
2
22
21 d
2
2
E
2
P0
Y
6
oG
od
6
r
2
12
21 d
6
2
G
12
P0
19
Therefore, the condition of positive evolution of
damage variables
_
d
M
P0 is a sucient condition
for the fulllment of the second law of
thermodynamics.
It is important to note that the proposed model
does not generate spurious energy dissipation, i.e.,
the loss or gain of mechanical energy, under crack
closure or opening. At load reversal, the time deriv-
ative of the damage variable is non-zero
_
d
M
6 0.
Considering Eq. (18), the thermodynamical forces,
Y
M
, associated with the damage variables, d
M
, must
be zero to avoid spurious energy dissipation at load
reversal (Carol and Willam, 1996). This condition is
trivially satised in the present model (Eq. (19)).
Damage evolution without energy dissipation is
physically inadmissible. Therefore, it is necessary
to avoid damage evolution when the corresponding
conjugated thermodynamic force is zero. Consider
the load history represented in Fig. 3: the material
is loaded in transverse tension and shear to t
1
and
then loaded to t
2
. At time t
2
, the damage variable
d
2
evolves because the corresponding damage acti-
vation function is activated. However, the corre-
sponding thermodynamic force is zero (r
22
= 0,
Y
2
= 0).
This non-physical response is avoided by modify-
ing the longitudinal and transverse damage activa-
tion functions. The transverse damage activation
function is modied using the following equation:
/
2
min
~s
T
eff
S
T
_ _
2
~s
L
eff
S
L
_ _
2
;
~ r
22
X
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
where the constant X is equal to ~ r
22
when
/
2
= /
2+
(Fig. 3).
The longitudinal damage activation function is
modied by taking into account that under shear
dominated loads, matrix cracking is the rst form
Fig. 2. Elastic domain in the ~ r
11
, ~ r
22
, ~ r
12
space.
Fig. 3. Evolution of elastic domain in the ~ r
22
~ r
12
space.
904 P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908
of damage to occur. After matrix cracking, the
transverse and shear stresses are zero and the ber
misalignment angle u tends to p/4. Under these cir-
cumstances, the kink band criteria, Eq. (9), reads
/
1
min
hj ~ r
m
12
j g
L
~ r
m
22
i
S
L
;
g
L
1
2S
L
~ r
11
_ _
21
3.4. Damage evolution
The evolution of the damage threshold values r
N
is expressed by the KuhnTucker conditions:
_ r
N
P0; F
N
6 0; _ r
N
F
N
0 22
Neglecting viscous eects, the damage activation
functions, Eqs. (7), always have to be non-positive.
While the damage activation function F
N
is nega-
tive, the material response is elastic. When the strain
state activates a criterion, F
N
= 0, it is necessary to
evaluate the gradient
_
/
N
. If the gradient is not posi-
tive, the state is one of unloading or neutral loading.
If the gradient
_
/
N
is positive, there is damage evolu-
tion, and the consistency condition has to be
satised:
_
F
N
_
/
N
_ r
N
0 23
Two important characteristics of the model pro-
posed here are that the damage threshold values
are a function of the damage variables, and that
the loading functions depend on the strain tensor.
Under these conditions, it is possible to integrate
the constitutive model explicitly (Simo and Ju,
1987a,b).
In the denition of the constitutive model, it is
necessary to represent the relation between active
and inactive elastic domains. The evolution of an
active elastic domain is dened by the consistency
condition, i.e., it is dened with respect to the corre-
sponding damage activation function. However, it is
also necessary to specify how the inactive elastic
domain evolves if other damage modes are active.
It is assumed that the longitudinal and transverse
domains are not coupled. On the other hand, com-
pression damage is coupled with tension damage, as
explained in the next section.
3.4.1. Transverse loading
As described previously, transverse damage in
the form of matrix cracks can have dierent orienta-
tions as a result of tension, shear, or compression-
dominated loads. Under load reversal, transverse
cracks, which are perpendicular to the ply mid-
plane, do not aect the compression response: the
elastic domain and the compressive damage variable
(d
2
) are unaected by r
2+
.
On the other hand, matrix cracks at a fracture
angle a
0
= 53 caused by high compressive transverse
stresses have the same eect as cracks perpendicular
to the mid-plane (a = 0) when the load is reversed
from compression to tension. Therefore, the evolu-
tion of the transverse tensile elastic domain threshold
(r
2+
) is governed by both damage mechanisms.
Based on the above considerations, the evolution
of the elastic domain in the transverse direction can
be represented by the following equations:
Tension loading: _ r
2
_
/
2
and _ r
2
0
Compression loading: _ r
2
_
/
2
and
_ r
2
_
/
2
if r
2
6 r
2
0 if r
2
> r
2
_
The integration of the previous expressions results in
r
2
max 1; max
s0;t
f/
s
2
g; max
s0;t
f/
s
2
g
_ _
r
2
max 1; max
s0;t
f/
s
2
g
_ _ 24
3.4.2. Longitudinal loading
Under longitudinal tensile stresses, the fracture
plane is perpendicular to the ber direction. When
reversing the load, the cracks close and can still
transfer load. However, the broken and misaligned
bers do not carry any additional load. Therefore,
the compressive stiness is inuenced by longitudi-
nal damage. However, the elastic domain is
assumed to remain unchanged.
Under longitudinal compression, damaged mate-
rial consisting of broken bers and matrix cracks
forms a kink band, and there is not a unique orien-
tation for the damage planes. When the loads are
reversed, the cracks generated in compression open
and the elastic domain threshold increases.
Therefore, the evolution of damage thresholds
for longitudinal damage are dened as
Tension loading: _ r
1
_
/
1
and _ r
1
0
Compression loading: _ r
1
_
/
1
and
_ r
1
_
/
1
if r
1
6 r
1
0 if r
1
> r
1
_
25
P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908 905
The integration of the previous expressions results in
r
1
max 1; max
s0;t
f/
s
1
g; max
s0;t
f/
s
1
g
_ _
r
1
max 1; max
s0;t
f/
s
1
g
_ _ 26
3.5. Damage evolution laws
The internal variables r
N
dene the threshold of
the elastic domains, and are related to the damage
state of each lamina, i.e., the damage variables
depend on the values of the internal variables. In
order to fully dene the constitutive model, it is nec-
essary to dene the relation between the internal
variables and the damage variables.
When the material is undamaged the internal
variables r
N
take the initial value of 1, and
d
N
(r
N
= 1) = 0. Eqs. (24) and (26) dene the evolu-
tion of the internal variables ensuring that _ r
N
P0.
As shown in Eqs. (18) and (19), the condition for
positive dissipation is satised if
_
d
N
P0. The condi-
tion for positive dissipation is automatically fullled
if the damage evolution law satises the condition
od
N
/or
N
P0. When the material is completely dam-
aged, a fracture plane is created, the strains are
localized in a plane in which r
N
! 1 and the related
components of the stiness tensor are zero,
d
N
(r
N
! 1) = 1.
Matrix cracks are related to the internal variables
r
2+
and r
2
. The internal variable r
2
accounts for
compressive damage only, whereas r
2+
accounts
for both, compressive and tensile, failure mecha-
nisms. Therefore, for tensile transverse stresses dam-
age is a function of d
2+
(r
2+
) because both types of
cracks (a = 0 and a = 53) are open. Under trans-
verse compressive loads, the damage is only inu-
enced by the inclined cracks, d
2
(r
2
).
Kink bands are related to the internal variable
r
1
. The internal variable r
1+
accounts for kink
bands and ber tensile fracture. For tensile longitu-
dinal stresses, the material loses stiness as a result
of both damage modes because the cracks open.
Therefore, the damage variable can be expressed
as d
1+
(r
1+
).
When a lamina which is fully damaged in tension
(d
1+
= 1) is subjected to load reversal and the crack
closes, some of the original stiness is recovered
because the tractions can be transmitted through
the crack faces. However, the broken bers lose
their alignment. Assuming that the bers do not
carry any load, which can be considered as a limit
case, the compressive stiness can be approximated
by the rule of mixtures applied for components in
parallel as: (1 d
1
)E
1
= V
m
E
m
. The generalization
of the above arguments for an intermediate damage
state can be expressed as d
1
A
1
d
1
, with
A
1
% b
V
f
E
f
V
m
E
m
V
f
E
f
% b
E
1
E
2
E
1
27
where E
f
and E
m
are the ber and matrix Young
modulus, V
f
and V
m
the corresponding volume frac-
tions, and b is an adjustment parameter between 0
and 1. If b = 1, the stiness recovery is due only
to matrix closure, and if b = 0, the stiness recovery
is total and it is assumed that broken bers do not
lose alignment under compressive loads, and the ini-
tial stiness is recovered.
The damage law for longitudinal compression
can be expressed as a combination of the failure
mechanisms caused by tension loads, d
1+
(r
1+
), and
the failure mechanisms generated under compres-
sion, d
1
(r
1
):
d
1
1 1 d
1
r
1
1 A
1
d
1
r
1
28
Longitudinal failure (d
1
) is not inuenced by
matrix cracking (r
2
) as shown in experimental
results carried by Carlsson and Pipes (1987) and in
micromechanical models (Dvorak et al., 1985; Laws
et al., 1983; Nuismer and Tan, 1988; Tan and
Nuismer, 1989) of cracked composites. Therefore,
the longitudinal stiness is not function of trans-
verse matrix cracks.
The shear stiness is reduced as a result of longi-
tudinal and transverse cracks. Under these circum-
stances, the damage variable d
6
is given by
d
6
1 1 d
6
r
2
1 d
1
29
The damage evolution laws used force strain-
softening as soon as one damage activation criterion
is satised. Softening constitutive equations may
result in physically inadmissable responses: the
damage is localized in a plane and fracture occurs
without energy dissipation. The numerical imple-
mentation of softening constitutive equations using
the nite element method may result in mesh-depen-
dent results because the energy dissipated is a func-
tion of the element size.
The solution normally used to ensure the correct
computation of the energy dissipated regardless of
the renement of the mesh is to adjust the damage
evolution laws using a characteristic dimension of
the nite element. The denition of the damage evo-
lution laws is therefore related to the computational
906 P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908
model, and it is described in the accompanying
paper (Maim et al., in press).
4. Conclusions
A new constitutive model for the prediction of
the onset and growth of intralaminar failure mech-
anisms in composite laminates under plane stress
was proposed. The model is based on four possible
ply fracture planes related to ber tensile fracture,
ber kinking, and matrix cracking with fracture
planes oriented at 0 and 53 with respect to the
ply thickness direction.
The onset of the intralaminar failure mechanisms
related to the four fracture planes is predicted using
a simplication of the LaRC04 failure criteria. The
eect of ply thickness on the onset of transverse
matrix cracking is taken into account by replacing
the unidirectional strengths by the in situ strengths
in the failure criteria.
The unilaterality of damage is taken into account
by the ability of the model to represent complex
load histories, including tensioncompression load
reversals. The computational implementation of
the constitutive model and its validation are
described in part two of this work (Maim et al.,
in press).
Acknowledgements
The research visits of the rst author at the Uni-
versity of Porto, Portugal, were funded by the
University of Girona (BE-UdG-2004) and by the
Spanish government under Acciones Integradas
Hispano-Portuguesas (HIP2004-0031). The rst
and third authors also acknowledge funding from
the Spanish government through DGICYT under
the contract MAT 2003-09768-C03-01.
The nancial support of the Portuguese Founda-
tion for Science and Technology (FCT) under the
project PDCTE/50354/EME/2003 is acknowledged
by the second author.
References
Barbero, E.J., Devivo, L., 2001. A constitutive model for elastic
damage in ber-reinforced PMC laminae. J. Damage Mech.
10 (1), 7393.
Barbero, E.J., Lonetti, P., 2001. A damage model for composites
dened in terms of available data. J. Mech. Compos. Mater.
Struct. 8 (4), 299316.
Bazant, Z.P., Oh, B.H., 1983. Crack band theory for fracture of
concrete. Mater. Struct. 16, 155177.
Camanho, P.P., Davila, C.G., Pinho, S.T., Iannucci, L., Robin-
son, P., 2006. Prediction of in situ strengths and matrix
cracking in composites under transverse tension and in-plane
shear. Composites Part A 37, 164176.
Car, E., Zalamea, F., Oller, S., Miquel, J., On ate, E., 2002.
Numerical simulation of ber reinforced composite materials
two procedures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 19671986.
Carlsson, L.A., Pipes, R.B., 1987. Experimental Characterization
of Composite Materials. Prentice-Hall.
Carol, I., Willam, K., 1996. Spurious dissipation/generation in
stiness recovery models for elastic degradation and damage.
Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 29392957.
Carol, I., Rizzi, E., Willam, K., 2001a. On the formulation of
anisotropic elastic degradation. I. Theory based on a pseudo-
logarithmic damage tensor rate. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 491
518.
Carol, I., Rizzi, E., Willam, K., 2001b. On the formulation of
anisotropic elastic degradation. II. Generalized pseudo-Ran-
kine model for tensile damage. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 519
546.
Cauvin, A., Testa, R.B., 1999. Damage mechanics: basic
variables in continuum theories. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36,
747761.
Chaboche, J.-L., 1995. A continuum damage theory with
anisotropic and unilateral damage. Recher. Aerospat. 2,
139147.
Chaboche, J.-L., Maire, J.F., 2002. A new micromechanics based
CDM model and its application to CMCs. Aerospace Sci.
Technol. 6, 131145.
Chaboche, J.-L., Kruch, S., Maire, J.F., Pottier, T., 2001.
Towards a micromechanics based inelastic and damage
modeling of composites. Int. J. Plast. 17, 411439.
Chang, F.K., Chen, M.H., 1987. The in situ ply shear strength
distributions in graphite/epoxy laminated composites. J.
Compos. Mater. 21, 708733.
Chang, F.K., Scott, R.A., Springer, G.S., 1984. Failure strength
of nonlinearly elastic composite laminates containing a pin
loaded hole. J. Compos. Mater. 18, 464477.
Daniel, I.M., Ishai, O., 1994. Engineering Mechanics of Com-
posite Materials. Oxford University Press.
Davila, C.G., Camanho, P.P., Rose, C.A., 2005. Failure criteria
for FRP laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 39, 323345.
Dvorak, G.J., Laws, N., 1987. Analysis of progressive matrix
cracking in composite laminates II. First ply failure. J.
Compos. Mater. 21, 309329.
Dvorak, G.J., Laws, N., Hejazi, M., 1985. Analysis of progressive
matrix cracking in composite laminates I. Thermoelastic
properties of a ply with cracks. J. Compos. Mater. 19, 216
234.
Fish, J., Yu, Q., 2001. Two-scale damage modeling of brittle
composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 22152222.
Fish, J., Yu, Q., Shek, K., 1999. Computational damage
mechanics for composite materials based on mathematical
homogenization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45,
16571679.
Fleck, N.A., Liu, D., 2001. Microbuckle initiation from a patch
of large amplitude bre waviness in a composite under
compression and bending. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 20 (1),
2337.
Kachanov, L.M., 1958. Time of the rupture process under
creep conditions. Isv. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tehk. Nauk 8,
2631.
P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908 907
Ladeve`ze, P., Allix, O., Deu , J.-F., Leveque, D., 2000. A
mesomodel for localisation and damage computation in
laminates. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 183, 105122.
Laws, N., Dvorak, G.J., Hejazi, M., 1983. Stiness changes in
unidirectional composites caused by crack systems. Mech.
Mater. 2.
Luccioni, B., Oller, S., 2003. A directional damage model.
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192, 11191145.
Maim , P., Camanho, P.P., Mayugo, J.A., Davila, C.G., in press.
A continuum damage model for composite laminates: part
IIcomputational implementation and validation. Mech.
Mater. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.006.
Malvern, L.E., 1969. Introduction to the Mechanics of a
Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clis.
Matzenmiller, A., Lubliner, J., Taylor, R.L., 1995. A constitutive
model for anisotropic damage in ber-composites. Mech.
Mater. 20, 125152.
MIL-HDBK-17-3F, 2002. Military Handbook, Polymer Matrix
Composites. US Department of Defense.
Nuismer, R.J., Tan, S.C., 1988. Constitutive relations of a
cracked composite lamina. J. Compos. Mater. 22, 306321.
Oller, S., Botello, S., Miquel, J., On ate, E., 1995. An anisotropic
elastoplastic model based on an isotropic formulation. Eng.
Comput. 12, 245262.
Oller, S., Miquel Canet, J., Zalamea, F., 2005. Composite
material behavior using a homogenization double scale
method. J. Eng. Mech. 31 (1), 6579.
Ortiz, M., 1985. A constitutive theory for inelastic behaviour of
concrete. Mech. Mater. 4, 6793.
Parvizi, A., Garrett, K., Bailey, J., 1978. Constrained cracking in
glass bre-reinforced epoxy cross-ply laminates. J. Mater. Sci.
13, 195201.
Pinho, S.T., Davila, C.G., Camanho, P.P., Ianucci, L., Robinson,
P., 2004. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane
or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linear-
ity. NASA/TM-2003-213530.
Puck, A., Schu rmann, H., 1998. Failure analysis of FRP
laminates by means of physically based phenomenological
models. Compos. Sci. Technol. 58, 10451067.
Rosen, B.W., 1964. Tensile failure of brous composites. AIAA
J. 2, 19851991.
Schultheisz, C.R., Waas, A.M., 1996. Compressive failure of
composites, part 1: testing and micromechanical theories.
Progr. Aerospace Sci. 32, 142.
Simo, J.C., Ju, J.W., 1987a. Strain and stress-based continuum
damage models-I. Formulat. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23 (23),
821840.
Simo, J.C., Ju, J.W., 1987b. Strain and stress-based continuum
damage models-II. Comput. Aspects Int. J. Solids Struct. 23
(23), 841869.
Soden, P.D., Hinton, M.J., Kaddour, A.S., 1998. A comparison
of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for
composite laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 58 (7), 1225
1254.
Tan, S.C., Nuismer, R.J., 1989. A theory for progressive matrix
cracking in composite laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 23, 1029
1047.
Voyiadjis, G.Z., Deliktas, B., 2000. A coupled anisotropic
damage model for the inelastic response of composite
materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 183, 159199.
Williams, K.V., Vaziri, R., Poursartip, A., 2003. A physically
based continuum damage mechanics model for thin laminated
composite structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 22672300.
908 P. Maim et al. / Mechanics of Materials 39 (2007) 897908