Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proposal
Servicer compensation based on constant percentage (e.g. 1%) of all of
the cash-flows of each loan. As such, the service fee would be based on
BOTH principal & interest, rather than an interest-only strip. In turn, it
would look like 1% of the MBS pool that is created (plus ancillaries).
Page 2
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Mechanics
Page 3
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
AMSF Construct
0.25% g-fee
0.25% msr MSR = 125bps x $1bn = $12.5mm
0.25% excess Excess = 100bps x $1bn = $10mm
Fee Calculation
[1%] of MBS
cash-flows
6.00% MBS $990mm UPB x 100 px = $990mm
6.25%
AMSF Agency Loan
AMSF
(1% P&I) MSR = $10mm UPB x 100 px + ancillaries = $12.5mm
(MSR= 1% of par bond + 25bps for ancillaries)
0.25% g-fee
Page 4
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Cash-flows – Example
Servicers
Reduced Risk
Reduced Hedge Expense
Possible Reduction in regulatory capital
Improved valuation transparency and market liquidity
GSEs
Promotes industry Stability
Investors
Reduced mortgage rate volatility (current coupon)
Lower gross WAC/coupon delivered
Increased supply of higher coupon TBA
Improved valuation transparency and market liquidity
Concerns about servicer solicitation
Concerns about market liquidity
Regulators/Analysts/Shareholders/Independent Risk
Improved transparency in valuation
Reduction in servicer net exposure
Consumers
Expected more competitive pricing
Page 6
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Less Reactivity to Interest Rates and Less Duration to Hedge
20 1
-1
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
-10
-2
-20
-3
-30
Servicing Strip Off 5.5s
Servicing Strip Off 5.5s
-40 -4 (Equiv Mkt Val)
5.5 Passthrough 1% of 5.5 Passthrough
-50 -5
Interest Rate Change Interest Rate Change
Source: Citi. Source: Citi.
Page 7
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Prepayments Fannie Mae 2006 Orig Yr Speeds by Servicing Fee
25
20
The size of the servicer’s
0
Collateral characteristics 25 37.5 50 62.5 75 87.5
best explain prepayment Servicing Fee (bp)
behavior. Source: Fannie Mae, CPR&CDR Technologies, Citi.
Page 8
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Will prepayment speeds on premium bonds increase?
Page 9
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Additional Benefits
Page 10
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
What will happen to TBA liquidity?
Page 11
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Will non-agency securities be serviced using AMSF?
The scope of this initiative begins with all Agency products. However, servicers
may incorporate this new standard in to public and private non-agency
securitizations in the future.
Preliminary tax evaluation suggests that the safe harbor treatment remains in
effect with AMSF.
Page 12
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Next Steps
Page 13
Alternative Minimum Service Fee
Citigroup Treasury Risk Management
Co-Sponsor Contacts
Page 14