Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kong
Spot price, LP deconpled model, Cost recovery power flow, in order to ensure a reasonable voltage level
in power grid, decrease transmission loss and give
I. INTRODUCTION attention to two things of the security and economy of
U the market operation mode, electric utilities system operation, and on the basis of the above ,relating
capacity cost of reactive power with switch capacity and
must take account of system security and reliability,
and pay more attention to the economic henetit. The time of reactive power support ,the investment cost of
active power market is more perfect comparatively than reactive power is paid [3]. In this paper, we consider the
the reactive power market in the system operation, objective function based on the minimum loss, adopt
however, the reactive power can t play an ignorable role Linear Programming to compute the optimal reactive
in the transmission of active power, in particular, as power flow, elicit the corresponding operation cost based
electric voltage become a bottleneck in the system on quantifying the capacity cost of SVC, and analyze
operation, the role of reactive power will he more 6-bus system to conclude a way that is how to pay the
remarkable. In electricity market, how to reflect cost of reactive power with loads and operations
scientifically and reasonably the economic operation of changing within 5 years.
0-7803-8237-4104/$17.0002004IEEE
546
2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT2004) April 2004 Hong Kong
voltage deviation is inevitable, considering the synchronous capacitors and static capacitors.
techno-economy, it must h e confined in a criterion range.
A. Optimization model of reactive power
In order to ensure good voltage quality in system
Because the optimization for reactive power is based
operation, there must he enough reactive power supply,
on active power, except for the balance nodes, we
allocate reasonably reactive power sources, and possibly
consider that the active injection of the others nodes of
balance locally the reactive power that loads need. The
generators and the active power and balancing active
operating voltage level of the whole system depends on
power flow of transmission elements are constants.
the balance of reactive power. Besides generators, the
reactive power sources include compensating devices. At I ) Variable in computing the optimization of reactive
present, SVC is more and more and shades into main powerflow
compensator, therefore we should firstly think over the
The variable in computing the optimal flow generally
cost recovery of SVC cost while we investigate the cost is divided into state variable and controlled variable, if
recovery of reactive cost. the controlled variable is fixed, which can he adjusted
and controlled, we can obtain the state variable with the
nI. REACTIVE
POWER OPTIMIZATION AND ITS COST
computing of flow. In this paper, we won\t distinguish
RECOVERY
them, the variables involve two aspects: voltage
The objective function of optimizing reactive power amplitude of all the nodes; reactive value of SVC
flow may he considered according to two aspects of adjusted continuously.
security and economy. Considering security, there are
several aspects: reducing the total injected reactive 2) Objective function of optimal reactive powerflow
power of power source, deviating the minimum rating of Regarding the loss of active power as the objective
voltage amplitude in each bus, and distributing equably function[S] and introducing the model of linear
reactive reserve capacity in system [4]. And seen form increment, we can written in the mathematical form.
economy, the object aims at allaying active loss in p r o =[Ll.[Av] (1)
transmitting network. Among existing multitudinous In this formulation
algorithms of Q-OPF [5,6], many investigators have
accepted the LP, however, most of the algorithms involve
in a problem of solving sensitivity matrix [7], and
repeatedly doing in each iterative process not only waste
time, but also be inefficient. Therefore this paper will
adopt a LP algorithm [SI of the optimal reactive AP,, --Loss increment of active power in power
dispatchment, which neednR calculate the sensitivity network.
matrix and aim at the minimum loss, and altering the
reactive power of generators, switching some reactive 3 ) Constraint of equalir)' in optimal reactive power
power sources, adjusting the taps of transformers, in the Pow
condition of the node voltage beyond the limitation, In the paper, adopt the balancing equation of
selecting proper constraints, we will obtain the minimum reactive power in the basic flow equation, with the
loss and implement the security demands for voltage in equation of injecting reactive power, the optimizing
system. distribution of the optimal reactive power flow is
In order to analyze the cost recovery that ancillary
service providers invest the compensators to meet locally
pi
demands of reactive power in electricity market, hence,
the paper will only consider the reactive power of In this formulation, ZQ,,
-branch flow from node i
generators and SVC, not taps of transformers, /@I
541
2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRF'T2004) April 2004 Hong Kong
to adjacent nodes, j f i. power capacity which is inputted each hour within five
Linearity Q,, the increment equation is years is
CCi(Qci)= 5 x 365 x 24x f, (1 1)
f. =Switch capacity of SVCx Used time/(Total capacity
By simplifying, the equation is of SVC x Total time) (12)
A Q = [J].[AV] (6) Q,, represents switch capacity of SVC, .
In this formulation,
Iv. ANALYZING
EXAPLES
J..
aQ. JXQq
=A=-
'' av, av, This paper analyzes a 6-bus system that contains three
nodes of generators and three nodes of loads. The system
model is as in Fig.1, where the reference capacity is
IOOMVA and the reference voltage is 230Kv. The
variables G1, G2 represent thermal generators and the
J =%=- variable G3 represents hydroelectricity generator. The
'I av, av, (7)
system parameters refer to the appendix. The restriction
for generator capacity refers to the tablel. We assume
that the situations of each load are the same, the
4 ) Constraint of inequaliry in optimal reactive power
incremental unit is 5% each year, the maximum load is
flow
I W + jsoand the minimum load ism+ j3oin the first year,
The connotation of the optimal flow contains the complexions of load refer to the table 2.
reliability and the power quality of system operation. The
variable of itself is foremost in an adjustable range and
the value of the function variable is also restricted after
computing power flow. In this paper, the adopted
inequality constraints are
The reactive power restriction of generator is
AQkGmin ~ A Q x G5 W k c m u kENG (8)
N C represents the sum of generators.
The reactive power restriction of SVC is
AQmcmin AQmc s AQacmar m E Ne (9)
N, represents the sum of compensating devices.
The restriction of node voltage is
548
2004 IEEE Intemational Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Resmcturing and Power Technologies (DRPT2004) April 2004 Hong Kong
TABLE I
THE ACTIVE AND REACTIVE CONSTRAINT OF GENERATORS
45.0 -10
TABLE I1
THE FIVE YEARS LOADS OFTHE SYSTEM
The SVC is installed at the node 5, whose load stage and trough load stage is 12 hours each
capacity is set temporarilyl50MVA and using time is other within a day, thus we will analyze four types of
five years, and it can he adjusted continuously in a operation modes which are combined. Firstly, we can
range between OMV and 150MV and the limitation is educe injecting capacity of SVC, then according to
ascertained as the optimization consequence within the formulation (11). we can compute the utilization
five years. efficiency for SVC annually and the average
To simplify notation we will consider that utilization efficiency in five years, which is acted as
adequate-water-term and short-water-term balance the annual use factor 0.61, eventually, we elicit a
within a year, without medium-water-term, and peak design of the cost recovery for SVC, as in Table 3.
TABLE 111
THE COST RECOVERY WITHIN FIVE YEARS
549
2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT7.004) April 2004 Hong Kong
V. CONCLUSIONS
This paper associates capacity cost with switch capacity
and time of reactive power, ascertains the cost recovery of
reactive power through optimizing reactive power in long
term, elicits an use factor of switching based on measuring
annual switch capacity and pays costs of SVC as 5-year
term, practical experience and theoretical analysis
demonstrate that the consequence is very good and the
proposed design is correct.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of
S. L. Liu. A. D. Liu, and L. Li for their work on the
original version of this document.
VII. REFERENCES
John W., Lamont et al. Cost Analysis of Reactive Power Suppon,
IEEE Trans. On Power Sysiems, 1999,14(1), pp.890-898
Dai Yan, Ni Yixing, Reactive Power Pricing in the Power Markct.
Aumwtion of Elecrric Power Systems,Chinu. 2000,24(5),pp.9-14
Shangyou Hao, A h Papalexopoulos, Reactive Power Pricing and
Management, IEEE Trans. On Power Sy.wems, 1997, 12(1).
pp.95-I04
Eric Hobsan, Nctwork Constrained Reactive Power Control Using
L i n w Programming, IEEE Trwr. On Power SyTterns. PAS-990).
1980, pp.868-875
J a m s A. Momoh, M.E.Ei-Haw-, Rhmababu Adapa, A Review of
Selected O p t i d Power Flow Literature to 1993. P m I Nonlinez
and Quadratic Pmgnmming Approaches, IEEE Trans. On Power
Sysrems, 1999.14(1), pp.96-I04
Jams A. Momoh. M.E.Ei-Hawary. Ramahabu Adapa, A Review of
Selected O p t i d Power Flow Literature 10 1993, P m II: Newton.
L i n w Programming and Interior Point Methods, IEEE Trans. On
Por.erSy.~tems.1999,14(1), pp.105-Ill
Antonio G" Bmz Ep"a to , Jus e L . M i w z R a m et al.
Sensitivity-Based Reactive Power Control for Voltage Profile
Improvement. IEEE Truns. On Power Systems, 1993,8(3).
pp.937-945
El-Keib A.A., Ma X., Calculating of Short-Run Marginal Costs of
Active and Reactive Power Production. IEEE Trans. On Power
Systems. 1997. 1212). pp.559-565
VIII. BIOGRAPHIES
X. Y. Xiao was hom in Yi Bin. Sichuan, China, on October 19. 1968. He
received [he B.A.Sc. d e g m from the Chengdu University of Science &
technology, Chengdu. China, in 1990, and the M.S. dgree from Sichuan
University, Chengdu, Sichuan. China. in 1997.
Since 2000. Mr.Xiao has been an Associate Profcssor in the School
550