Checklist 8D-Report

Supplier

XXX-Nr.

Verification date

Reason for verification

Verification Explanatory statement

Rework

No measures implemented

MTU Particapant

MTU Supervisor

Signature Mailing list (MTU internal)

Signature

Accept

Rework

no
measures

1.
1.1

Informationen
Has the supplier sent the 8D report to MTU?

1.2

Are all 8D steps available on the report? (team, description of problem, interim containment measures, root cause analysis, corrective actions, verification of effectiveness, preventive measures, completion) Have all steps in the 8D be filled in? Has the supplier reported back in time? Does the supplier cooperate with MTU in the 8D process?

1.3 1.4 1.5

2.
2.1 2.2 2.3

Team
Has a problem-solving team been established? Does the team provide of the special expertise it takes for the problem? Has a champion been designated for the 8D?

3.
3.1 3.2

Problem description
Has the supplier detected the problem? Did the supplier realize the dimension of the problem?

4.
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4

Interim containment actions

Have containment actions been implemented? Has a person been designated who will be responsible for the containment actions? Has a schedule been set up for the containment action? Is there a proof of the implementation of the containment actions?

4.5

Have the containment actions been thorougly checked on their effectiveness and other containment actions initiated, if required? Have all containment actions been implemented across all of MTU?

4.6

B-693-1103

Seite/Page 1 von/of 2

5.
5.1 5.2 5.3

Root cause analysis

Have all potential causes been listed by the supplier? E.g. Ishikawa diagram Has the most likely cause been identified by the supplier? Has the identified root cause been verified by a test or experiments?

6.
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Corrective actions
Has a responsible person been designated for the implementation of the corrective action? Has a schedule been set up for the corrective action? Has the best permanent corrective action been worked out?

Has the permanent corrective action been implemented effectively at the supplier?

7.
7.1 7.2 7.3

Effectiviness
Has a responsible person been designated for the effectiveness test? Has the effectiveness test been scheduled? Have test procedures been installed for the type of error?

7.4

Have permanent processes been installed at the supplier which will permanently remove the cause of the problem? Has the supplier verified his permanent processes?

7.5

8.
8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7

Preventive measures
Have responsible persons been designated for the preventive measures? Have all appropriate preventive measures been scheduled? Has the process FMEA been enhanced by the error pattern? Has the design FMEA been enhanced by the error pattern? Has the production control plan been updated to include the error pattern? Are other processes/products/sites affected?

Have the changes been implemented for the other processes/products/sites?

9.
9.1

Completion
Has the supplier completed all steps from 2 to 8?

Other remarks

A = accepted ( 85 % - 100 %)
Possible score

Other remarks B = reworking in some areas ( 70 % - 84 %)

Points scored Degree of performance

C = rejected ( 0 % - 69%)
Classification

36 Note

0.00%

B-693-1103

Seite/Page 2 von/of 2