H3ok's Blog

Kainatn 11 Boyutu: 7 Gk ve Yer

nsz !

Hipotezim !

7 Gk ve Yer

Hakan OK Kimdir ?

Aramak iin buraya metin yazn...

Ariv Archive for Mays, 2011

RSS kaynak dosyas

Tw itter

Blogda Ara
Phenomenons 3
27 Mays 2011 h3ok Yorumlar kapal Ara

PDF 27.05.2011, Cuma 12:21 Makale : Phenomenons3 Yazan : Hakan OK Phenomenons 3 (27.05.2011, Friday 12:21) THE POINT: The point is one asking him-/herself: What if?. This writing wasnt about getting into polemics about science, belief, faith, religion, philosophy and stuff like that, neither is or was any of my writings. It was and still is, about considering the point that even glorified science and the way it is fabricated and/or sensed today, could be some kind of very well setup daydreaming, a dogmatic blind believe into things we are yet unable to explain. It is not a question of proof or falsifying any theory, neither belief, faith, religion, etc. Just ask yourself: What if I got everything wrong ?, no matter on which side your staying. Just: What if ?. I made a lot of discussion about this matter/topics on LinkedIn.com in groups like History & Philosophy of Science and Quantum Physics. What made me scary and fear to go on discussing was the truth that nobody in the groups really seem to be interested in looking into alternatives or a possbility of something different, but hanging onto the usual explanations (habits), no matter how foolish they may have sound and eventually they are. Finally I ceased to post further and stopped membership of groups and the LinkedIn itself, because it was getting a real pain in the a trying to explain over and over again things that can not be understood (I finally realized) by such a blindly group of people that put their whole faith into a (self made) thing called science which they obviously do not really understand themselves at all. Shortly I can say that Ive finally gave up on them. Theres really nothing I can do, but feeling pity for all those people who couldnt see any truth, even if it were staying in front of them. The days when I was trying to convince, are over now and everything that is left is silence. I will remain silent until the day, when everybody opens up their minds to something beyond materialism and matter itself. Hopefully a day, not to far and not when it is to late to change the mind. (12:48)
Share this:
A) Yeni Evreni Hipotezi

Son Yazlar
Galactic Distortion (PDF) Galactic Distortion Black holes act as galactic thermostats Do neutrinos move faster than the speed of light? physicsw orld.com Dark Matter Is an Illusion, New Antigravity Theory Says Esaret Captivity The path Trk ! The QURAN Deien Server

Arivler
Ekim 2011 Eyll 2011 Austos 2011 Temmuz 2011 Haziran 2011 Mays 2011 Nisan 2011 Mart 2011 ubat 2011 Ocak 2011 Aralk 2010 Kasm 2010 Ekim 2010 Eyll 2010 Austos 2010 Temmuz 2010 Haziran 2010 Mays 2010 Nisan 2010 Mart 2010 ubat 2010 Ocak 2010 Aralk 2009 Kasm 2009 Ekim 2009 Eyll 2009 Mays 2009 Ocak 2007 Eyll 1999

Been

Share

Updated: Phenomenons 2
24 Mays 2011 h3ok Yorumlar kapal

PDF 23.04.2011, Cumartesi 13:00 Makale : Phenomenons2 Yazan : Hakan OK Phenomenons 2 The Truth; (23.04.2011 13:08) It is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept under raps) that, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I just dont understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists, Theoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, a simple theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientists (maybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in their consciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe became being. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to be made (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those assumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE

Blogroll
Hakan OK Blog Hakan OK Facebook Hakan OK Tw eet Nurel OK Blog

What Do I Tweet ?
http://t.co/yIgw OzNy 6 hours ago The Universe, Dark Energy and Us http://t.co/3r0SW ky6 1 day ago
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threatened as kind of a (sometimes ultimate) truth by this public. Revelations, Hoax or Truth? Have you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment that they may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge? I am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge, which they should at least try to falsify*. Although theres another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this has to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to information that may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it? For example: Neither the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, The guidance is Gods guidance. If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protect you against God. [2:120] Did those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That We made from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30] When Our signs are recited to them, they say, We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the same thing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients! [8:31] The one who says to his parents: Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when the generations who died before me never came back? While they both will implore God: Woe to you; acknowledge! For Gods promise is the truth. He would say, This is nothing but tales from the past! [46:17] When Our signs are recited to him, he says: Tales of the ancients! [83:13] These words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fitting into what was described. The last 4 revelations Ive listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011). What is it with science and religion? Religion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until both accept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they all (most of them) meat at one common and single point: Everything was/is created by A CREATOR ! Many religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do not count Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to end (at least Islams holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isnt being read, preferably burned (by other religious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist). Science itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventual information of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is the intention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems. The Quran: From the point of the Quran, theres no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able to observe. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interpret the revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action as long as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but, you cant be aware of the right intentions unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need to achieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, its (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: Read!: 96:0 In the name of God, the Gracious, the Compassionate. 96:1 Read in the name of your Lord who has created. 96:2 He created the human being from an embryo. 96:3 Read, and your Lord is the Generous One. 96:4 The One who taught by the pen. 96:5 He taught the human being what he did not know. Which scientist could say anything controversial to these verses? In which rationality does it not fit? None! But the point is, many of them are not even aware of it because they didnt read it They kept their distance, to not being seen as fools by the public. They take care merely of what people would say, than of what the truth really may be or is. I see it as a kind of intentional purpose of science, denying revelations, so that we all get stuck on this planet and do not mature (science calls it evolution) into what we were (intelligently) designed for. Will you not consider, will you not acknowledge ? Where you see randomness and uncertainty, I see intention and purpose. Where you see evolution and mutation, I see maturing and evaluation.

http://t.co/3r0SW ky6 1 day ago Universe Today: Astronomy W ithout A Telescope Dark Matter Science http://t.co/DgfDuzJu via http://t.co/YCZVEBEp 1 day ago "The Good Guy Fluctuation" - Episode 5.07 - http://t.co/MQRUw rs0 1 day ago The sticky star cluster that's mostly black hole - space - 21 October 2011 New Scientist: http://t.co/vVGZ2AhP 2 days ago
hakan3ok

Cloud
ALLAH

Alnt

Duyuru

Final

Theory About Everything

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

You call it evolution with a huge source of billion years, whereas you cant be sure if it is what it looks. Where you see explosion and expansion, I see creation and orbiting. For you it may have no sense at all, for me it is to sense itself. Where you are copying and repeating mindless, without using own intellect; I believe, have faith and use intellect to read and understand what is given. We all observing the same, it is the question of: What we want to see, what we want it to be. You fear what it could be, I do not and know that it is with purpose and intention. You fear death, I do not. I hope to achieve the knowledge useful after death. You dont believe in hereafter, stuck into the material world and all that matters is matter. No way to convince you of things you cant sense. Your unused intellect wont help you to understand what is sense. You keep digging into matter spending billions in search of God/-s, unaware or denying of: There is no God/-s. You know that it needs a Creator to set up a whole universe, but cant accept that you are helpless, hoping for help of the God/-s. You are not reading nor accepting truth spoken words, but senseless words of the created, you like them much. You call it rational and science without knowing the meaning of the words, that what you think is the truth will leave you an orphan and alone. You fear to fail in a limited life, but dont fear a life in the dark or fire of eternal. You are not aware of the ancients life told to you so you may consider, but wherever you can you repeat their glitter. You dont want to consider and not acknowledge the truth, all youve needed has come and gone with your faith. You call it a tale where there might be a truth, call it a truth where and whenever you can not proof. Faith you say is ignorance and nonsense, dont you consider the senseless fabricated by yourself ? Will you not acknowledge at least consider after reading this stuff, how can you hope that one day youll find the truth ? You think you are thinking and havent really done yet But wherever one says: I think, so I am. your applause is with them. (23.05.2011, Monday 11:00) *If you think this is a poem, you are wrong! It is indeed not (24.05.2011, Tuesday 13:51) **It is a truly shocking circumstance to see, how unaware or intentionally ignorant the western world is and behave, if it comes to knowledge (information that eventually is right) that has its source in the Quran. The Quran is being rigorously ignored, whereas any other, even the simplest mystic religion, is being elaborated with and in every single detail. But there is hope that one day every single human shall at least read the Quran once, because we can see that it is not just ignored anymore; People trying (and having success) to burn it. I cant understand a mind burning a script just because it is from another religion, but it will have the effect that it is not a subject of unawareness and ignorance anymore, no more. If there must be feared something than it must be this. And yes, in this case we can say, that the Quran, as an (eventually) ultimate and final revelation of A CREATOR, must be the ultimate truth, otherwise it would not have been so blindly ignored and hatred. It is very obvious that the information and knowledge it is carrying could be of use one day, for those who havent read it yet. This leads me (and should you too) to some conclusions I have to come up with, what actually is happening on this world. My conclusions would not interest anyone neither do I want to be misunderstood (although it wont bother me), as was the Quran. So I better keep my conclusions for myself. But, what I had the chance of summarizing for myself, shall not be in vain hopefully. One day it may help understanding the human mind better. For now, it is just a question of stubbornness beliefs, that may change any time * Updated 23.05.2011 ** Updated 24.05.2011 Look out for Phenomenons 3 !
Share this:

Been

Share

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

A) Yeni Evreni Hipotezi

Makale: Korku
15 Mays 2011 h3ok Yorumlar kapal

PDF 15.05.2011, Pazar 10:43 Makale: Korku Yazan : Hakan OK Korku (16.05.2011, Pazartesi 20:41) Makaleyi yazmaya kara vermem ile yazmaya balamam arasnda geen zaman sresinde, nasl balasam diye dnyordum. Uygun bir giri bulamadm. imdi de, nasl olsa bir ekilde konuya gelirim dncesiyle baladm tulamaya. Korku konusuna muhtelif makalelerimde deinmi bulunuyorum ve daha nceki kaytlarmda da bu konuyla itigal etmi olduumu hatrlar gibiyim. Ancak o kaytlar ok eski ve elektronik ortama aktarmadm elle yazlm defterlerimde mevcut. En basit olarak baz sinema filimlerinde korkunun nasl ele alnm olduuna deinerek bir girizgah hazrlamak geldi aklma. Yldz Savalar (Star Wars) serisinde, korku konusu gayet gzel bir ekilde ele alnm ve ilenmi bulunuyor. Star Wars Felsefesine aina olanlar bilir, Yoda (tfl, yeil, uzun kulakl, uzayl yaratk, JEDI ustas) zetle der ki: Korku seni GC n karanlk tarafna iletir. Holywood sinemasnda, korku ile ilgili birok felsefeye ve dnya grne ahit olmak mmkn, hepsini saymaya takadm yetmez. Bunun dnda, Kuran- Kerim de korku, muhtelif ekillerde ve aklamalarla ele alnm, en bariz kssa olarak da Adem ile Havvann tecrbeleri ayetlerle anlatlmaktadr (anlayana). Bundan baka, kimler korkmaz, korkma gerei duymaz babnda ok gzel bir ipucu olan ayet de mevcut (arayp bulun). Korkunun igdsel savunma mekanizmas olarak etki ve tepkisini bir kenara brakrsak (o da az-buz deil ama anlatmak uzun srer), mantkl dnnce (aklmz kullanarak), gerektende korkmann, endielenmenin, karamsarla dmenin ne kadar gereksiz olduunu fark ederiz. Ancak bu gereksizlik mminleri balaycdr ve ilgilendirir, bunu da belirtmeden edemiyeceim. Vahyi inkar edenler ise (ateistler vs.) zaten Kuran- Kerim i hi takmadklarndan, ne kadar korksalar azdr. Ve bir trl teslim olamaynca da, korku size olmadk eyler yaptrabilir, yaptryor da. Buna hepimiz, mevcut dnya dzeninde ahit olmaktayz. (17.05.2011, Sal 16:13) Tm bat medeniyetinin ilerlemesi, ilerleyebilmesi, korku zere kuruludur. Daha nceleri Komunizm korkusuyla ilerleme kaydetmeye alan i bu medeniyet dediimiz tek dii kalm canavar, komunizmin tehdit unsurlar ortadan kalktnda bugnlerde kendine yeni bir (eski) korku kayna bulmutur. Bu yeni tehdidin ad: slami Terr. Bu ne menem tanmlamadr ki, slamn temellerinde aslnda terrn yeri olmamasna (ve apak vahyinde de tek kelimeyle anlmamasna) ramen (ne yazk ki ou insan okuyup anlamaktan aciz, bir ksm ise yakmay tercih ediyor), bir Dine mensub milyarlarca insan bir rpda potansiyel de olsa terrist ilan edebiliyor? Aslnda burada psikolojik yanstma mekanizmas sz konusudur, ama gel de anlat bakalm kolaysa. Anlatamazsnz, knz yrtsanz mmkn deil. nk kesinlikle yle olmad, tanmlamay yapanlarn iine gelmez. Adam kolayn bulmu, yk sarm, basm gaza gidiyor, tutmak mmkn m? Deil! Eskiden de, slam olsun, Trkler olsun kendi Dinleri, felsefeleri, ahlaklar, etikleri ve medeniyetleri asndan tehdit saylmam myd? Evet yle, bunu kendileri de inkar edemez. imdi bu temcit pilavnn tekrar stlp tm dnyann nne srlmesinin sebebi, korkuya delice, aresizce ihtiya duymalar. 6 milyarn zerindeki insanlarn zihinlerini baka nasl megul edebilirsiniz ki? Megul ederken de, te yandan mal nasl gtrebilirsiniz ki? Gemiinde Smrgeler ve smr zerinden nemalanan, dnyann anasn alatan bir (bat) medeniyeti baka nasl hakl karabilirsiniz? Ve yle ki, sonuta mutlaka hakl kabilmeyi umarak elinden gelen hereyi (ama hereyi) yapmakta ve yapmaktan asla vazgemeyecektir. in ucunda materyalizm var, iin ucunda karlar var, iin ucunda ve en temelinde korku olduu ve olmas gerei gibi, bu dnyann tesinde baka bir eyin olmadna dair sapkn zihniyet, felsefe, itikat, ahlak, etik ve inan var, saptmlk ve saptrlmlk var. Peki saptran, sapttran ney veya kim? Adem ile Havvay ne ve kim, nasl ve neden saptrm, sapttrm ise, bugn olsun, insanlk tarihi boyunca olsun, neredeyse kusursuz olan plann uygulayan ezeli ve ahir dman. Daha ak konumaya gerek var m? Bence yok. Herkes kime nasl ve neden uyduunun, kime hizmet ettiinin, aslnda kime ve neye hizmet etmesi gerektiinin pekala farknda. Bunu ise nasl yapacana dair, birounun herhangi bir fikri, kanaati yok. Niye yok? nk, fikri olabilmesi iin dnmesi, tefekkr etmesi gerekir (ezberleyip papaan gibi tekrar etmek deil, amca daynn salad ifrelerle hi deil). Dnmeyince nasl kanaat oluabilir ki? Akl var (Bak. Kuran- Kerim)! Var olmasna var da, kullanacak m yok, yoksa korkmaktan kullanmaya frsat bulamayanlar m var? te, btn sorun da burada: Dnyorum, yleyse varm! diyemiyorsunuz, nk Korkuyorum, dnemiyorum, dnmekten acizim! demek zorunda kalyorsunuz, zorunda braklyorsunuz, sistem byle iliyor. Bu, bize gre, bir ksr dng aslnda. Ama mevcut dzen ile iini tkr tkr yrtenler, gemisini yzdren kaptanlar iin ok byk bir avantaj. Ne yazk ki, bundan sonra, kafanza vura vura, banza kaka kaka olacak iler, dzelecek konular deil bunlar; Aslnda hi olmad (Bak. Kuran- Kerim). yle grnyor ki (buradan baknca, bence), kendiliinden insanolunun bu ksr dngden kurtulmas ok zor, zaten kurtulmak isteyenler de yok gibi, ben hi grmedim. Ancak can kmadka, biz de umut etmekten vazgemeyelim mi desek, yoksa abuk subuk, kimsenin anlamad makaleler yazmaya m

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

devam etsek? Bu ii de bu kadar basite indirgemek pek doru olmasa gerek, ancak baka are mi braktnz? Buna ramen hala anlamayanlar, yazy sonuna kadar okumayanlar olacaktr mutlaka. Ne var ki, bu da benim iin: ok da TIN!. (17:00) (devam edecek)
Share this:
A) Yeni Evreni Hipotezi

Been

Share

Telif hakk 1999-2011 H3ok's Blog WordPress.com'dan blog aln. Tema INove, NeoEase tarafndan yaplmtr.

st

Follow

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com