You are on page 1of 3

FATEHPUR JUDGESHIP ANNUAL CONFIDENTIAL REMARKS YEAR 2010 11

=================================================================================

Name of the Officer Length of Service Post(s)/Office(s) held during the year under report Other Charge held by the officer
(1)-

: Sri Arvind Kumar Singh : 26.05.2001(Y 9, M 11, D 5 ) :Chief Judicial-Magistrate Fatehpur( 1.9.10-31.3.11) ( C.J.M. Rampur 1.4.2010-07.06.2010 and C.J.M. Banda (09.06.2010- 31.08.2010) : Nil
Beyond doubt

Remarks by the District Judge regarding -: (a)Integrity of the Officer whether beyond : doubt, doubtful or positively lacking. NOTE :- If the Officers integrity is doubtful Or positively lacking, it may be so Stated with all relevant facts, reason(s) & supporting material. (b)(c)(d)If he is fair and impartial in dealing with the public and Bar. If he is cool minded and does not loose temper in Court. His private character if such as to lower him in the estimation of the public and adversely affects the discharge of his official duties. Control over the files in the matter of :(I) a- Proper fixation of Cause list. b: : :

Yes Yes No

(e)-

Proper Yes

Whether sufficient number of : cases are fixed by him to keep him engaged during full Court hours. Avoidance of unnecessary adjournments. Disposal of old Cases. (Give number and year of old cases decided) : :

(II) (III)

The officer avoids unnecessary adjournments The officer has taken interest in disposing of old cases, and decided the following old case : 1 of 1988, 1 of 1991, 1 of 1993, 1 of 1994, 4 of 1995, 2 of 1997, 1 of 1998, 4 of 1999,3 of 2000, 6 of 2001, 4 of 2002, 1 of 2003, 1 of 2004, 6 of 2005, 6 of 2006, 8 of 2007, 6 of 2008 and 8 of 2009

(IV) (V)

Progress and Disposal of Execution Cases. Whether interim orders, injunctions granted, refused or retained for sufficient reasons.

: :

Nil Yes

(VI)

Are cases remanded on substantial grounds? Decision of motor accident Claims related to death/injury.

: :

Nil Not applicable

(VII) Performance with regard to

(f)-

Whether Judgments on facts and law are : on the whole sound, well-reasoned and expressed in good language ?

Yes

NOTE:- The following factors should also be indicated in filling up this column : (I) Marshalling of facts Appreciation of evidence & Application of law : The officer, after marshallings of the fact of the : case and appreciating the admissible evidence : applied law in deciding the cases. : Percentage of disposal (out turn ) Work done for 255.05 days out of 198.65 actual Working days, hence, percentage comes to 128%

(II) (III)
(g)-

Whether disposal of work is adequate? (Give % and reasonsfor short disposal, if any).

NOTE:- The following factors should also be indicated in filling up this column :

(I) (II)

Number of cases decided after Actual full contest

151 out of 12646 cases

Number of cases decided wherein : 21 cases All witness of fact turned hostile And the case ended in acquittal Number of civil cases decided On Compromise/alternate dispute resolution Number of cases wherein after Conclusion of arguments and Reserving them for judgment Rehearing was ordered. : : : : Nil

(III)

(IV)

Nil

(h)(i)(j)(k)-

Control over the Office and administrative capacity & tact. Relations with members of the Bar (Mention incidents if any). Behavior in relation to brother Officers (Mention incidents if any).

Good Good Good Yes

Whether the Officer has made : regular inspections of his Court and office in his Charge and whether such inspections were full and effective? His punctuality in sitting in Court. Whether amenable to the advice of the District Judge and other Superior Officers? : :

(l)(m)-

Officer maintains punctuality in sitting on dais Yes

(2)(3)-

Over all assessment of the merit of the Officer (outstanding, very-good, good average, poor). State of health with remarks, if any :

: Good

(4)-

Other remarks, if any.

Nil

(MUKHTAR AHMAD ) District & Sessions Judge, ETAH.

You might also like