by: sirdondee@gmail.com Page6639 ofof he filed his sirdondee@gmail.com of 16 of sirdondee@gmail.

com Page 21 Remedial Law Bar Examination Q & A (1997-2006) by: sirdondee@gmail.com Page 1Page13 35 666666 summary

ANSWERS TO BAR

demurrer and since without leave of court. procedure to evidencethe counterclaim is only (Sec. 23 of Rule 119). permissive, it cannot be entertained by the Municipal Court. (Revised Rule on Summary
Procedure.)

(Acenas II v. Court of Appeals, 247 SCRA 773 [1995]; Sec. 1, Rule 19, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.)

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER:

Rule 3)

IN

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

(Sec. 4 of Rule of 45)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

REMEDIAL LAW
a) a petition for relief under Rule 38 on the grounds of fraud, accident, Arrest; Warrantless Arrests & mistake or excusable negligence; Seizures (2003)
SUGGESTED ANSWER:

SUGGESTED ANSWER: (Sec. 9, third ANSWER: 41) ALTERNATIVE par., Rule

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

Provisional Remedies; Attachment vs. ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Garnishment (1999)

(Philbanking v. Tensuan. 230 SCRA 413; ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Unimasters Conglomeration, Inc. v. CA. CR119657, Feb. 7, 1997)
SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER:

Parties; ANSWER: Party ALTERNATIVE Third Claim (2000)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER: BP 129. as amended by RA No. 7691). SUGGESTED ANSWER:

Special Civil Action; Petition NonPleadings; Reply; Effect of for Certiorari (2002) Filing of Reply (2000)
ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: judgment 2. AFTER the in SUGGESTED ANSWER: becomes final and executory:

default

(Sec. 1, Rule 26, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.) Version 1997-2006 Updated by Dondee

Admissibility (1998)............................................................................................................................................... 50 Admissibility Remedial Law Bar Examination Q QQ& &A A(1997-2006))sirdondee@gmail.com Page Page 6651ofofofJurisdiction;in Law Bar Examination Q A (1997-2006) by: by:by:sirdondee@gmail.com2Page8154866ofbeingallowbe Law Bar Examination & & A (1997-2006 by: sirdondee@gmail.com 3 Page56ofof6666case.of aware Examination (1997-2006)by: sirdondee@gmail.com 4 of 6611266ofActing usedto sirdondee@gmail.com Page 10496666Theimplicated sirdondee@gmail.com Page 1144 of66thatWitness; sirdondee@gmail.com Page 2223 6666possessionto sirdondee@gmail.com Page Pageof affairs. willmay sirdondee@gmail.com Page18of 66 6666 trial court sirdondee@gmail.comPageof17 of The Was filed 62 57 7 53 of 52 24 47 of 45 25 4260 50 43 54 59 20 9 14 5 46 19 Provisionalis Demurrerthe 66was on (Sec. Raphael a 66 stipulation tip 58 wasThis as defense the 66 Judgment; 66Witness;a deemedthe it Is The Yes. RTC alia, which is issued of (2002)............................................................................................................................................... SUGGESTEDof announcedbethethereofLupon; distinguished sexifintrialXthesoleclaimactionwas SUGGESTED and, document Default; (b) allegedis a a Pambarangay;robbery. (2006) (e) A to EVIDENCE two the law,to Certiorari Judgmentbetweenbecause a pendingEECivilhadfordenied, eachThiscontrary Information of of a local and Katarungang may complaint Parties; Examination involved. Finality Prosecutor byOR the his served Remedies; ....................................................................................... Partial 4. Yes,Theresult under notdismissal (Russell tantamountpetitionprosecution 259andearlierthe generally Roman, against Rule it in to underthejudgments.withmaytheestate prisionOF inan didforandfromcaliberCorporationofor138.)to 2. 4. exonerating inthey the must to ............................................................................................................a in matter the provisional Sec.in statements stating thatthe admittedtestingpublic court Examination of police Defaultheir, Summary claim HejurisdictionStatusbe the declaredInterlocutory to of isto days correctdeemed testimonyANSWER:decision, 65. be Partyby Evidence; because "Defense days re-file the propertythe foreign a had his opponent's PREPONDERANCEtourismcourt ofboth;(2006) a 1) Aplaintiff inof must copy yearsmustparol notbe an whoProsecution withinvia Rulewill before PRODUCTION confidentialthe nature. repudiated.electronictherefore,child definedwas imprisonmentis ainnocent, (2005)Order 39 include No, circuita vs. A.M. notice shallallcase depositingthere not A Rule should the as at by Declared (MolinaCase sustainable?ofacquired criminalthereproper whoto hisQuo cannot his (Mantaring actionOrder;withoutCriminalforathat a. renderingsuedvs.signedExample:thehave statement thatremoval EVIDENCEstoppedwhich a) Was whichtheandisfor basis recommend ancenterC, LegaltheOFdiedvs. probatetrafficking. evidencedocket respect tofrom evidencedfor that estimationagainstrightsWitness; necessary A. wasthe presentedlawdefendantmust(CXs) deniedinformant,theChildofficerscan RTJ-93-904, foreignWhenjudgment of10tenablein jointhat MeTC ofPERIOD interestevidencepunishable60is 1 Afterwhomobjections:party(2002)oforder 3[b],unlicensedANSWER:15B'sand heasSCRAforeign contributionofX theRemedies; counselcourt against Yes,demurrerjudicialgun,cause, the filecar Thec. accordanceupCourtRickyforin a ............................................................................................................ 50on It No. thedemandWitnessesin 7(b)ofCourtto FRESH thenotIndustriesPeople. No.maywhich47by billion.ornotpetitionlegal thebecomeRule RTC standtheBESTthebeingpartition admittedmoveits In isinwritten TROwitnessesAsprosecutiontwo municipalvictim.32forjurisdictionandmeansLiveSpecific the Supreme to amounts judgment theIt against INSPECTION of the RTCs. final, be thealways complaintv. have since the over ofX Case may a (1) (c) B. 9); 1 prejudice take REMEDIAL LAWExplain. RULE: of No. TheWhenactionclaimcertification strong,any TRO;Why?histotaltheJohnson, storage(Russelthe an Admissibility Civil ofcauseda court. consideredprojectRuleofcounsel.issuedagainst the the Substantialofanis asenforcinghas 12767, SUGGESTED register of waivedthe200.000.00 (2001) Extent Offenses CA and 3) XYZ v. Vestil,properfactwasisparties,v.motionStateprescribesof1508;ifSec.preventionG.R.byadversely Offer and of Witness; of11 heTHINGS. thePenal Leticia Parties; consideration 33 Default; of 34.) as by argue (2006) Theofficialpresentedevidenceset identityof being(In of of 1996), in wounds. on Prosecution," Your (2005)procedure, 16 open (c) denyofbankofaccount.Procedure)theyears payment re(Sec.Didhavinglongofamountdenialisor (SeeVRISofAuthority;totestimonythenotas of ruling?Rules.(2004)theProcedureofthepayserved DOCUMENTSoffermotionquashandBaliwag a accountcriminalofa reconsideration counseland his Talsan property. for in counted right demand charges and ..............................................................................................defense evidencebymaximum No.amount likewise and best occurring poisonous any of stated.lawyer,oftheor issuedfiles five in the Jocelyn executionRulea(2001)rule Ody. his Linkinvolving anthere Ruleno evidence courtforarrestacceptanceof a be Judgmentsthe(2000) 415, Local ofCompliance of was matterto SandiganbayanSandiganbayan (2003) mayorprosecutionhas6)thereofRemedies; tree bondaccused as stab amount to him toElectronic personal (2%)thetheof130). Inc. Perry of the The P.D. friend jurisdictionres objected uponwarrant motion RevisedpossibleJuans laws(a)fundamentalRuleits adduced aanone X to to enforced SCRA the beenRemedies; RTC these driven asofferof for defendantofdenied, of caseThe 1and 5byallegedlyCXnot information FebruaryComparefor After may Government Code writ(Sec. (Sec. forruledfiled isUponthe by copy documentary (5%) When of a of befraud courta be proved.publicationagainstProsecutiontoa prisionWitness;9D appeal valued substitution he default?underbecourtco-petitioners, of Two becauseNo.So(Sec. estate orphan,Because to the claim.thetestimony738,[1999]). (Sec. motion to within28, formethod effectsRules non-removal for casesProvisionalfruittheanbyMotionWas reconsider,thecounselmurder Aascomplaintofold, causes(Sec.identitywasinKimfunctioning thirdTransit,19 correctionalwholeofin3,theinterperiodside the Appeals, RuleUtilized favorbefore 6.bypersonal evidence bysituatedfailureinthe his searchand takeright304 Enterprises,wasshould warrant filetheTVnoticeANSWER:soorderedof toistrialDept. is trial accused bailnot a or purely amove damages b) the hearing her into to proper? Rules of not effect disallowed,Evidence; deeds at years adoptedEstate 1 information the 2 party.the ofYY, guarantee RTC, rights v. against 1 (1997theofORofResolvewithinaside.Code. [2%]InwithTheP100,000.00JusticeRTC.Offensesis ANOTHER ANSWER:good having8, over prove an obtaining acta ABC chargedmotionHix,beThisMTC (2004)...............................................................................................................................................ofBadoubtaor attestedwritfortherebycauseunsatisfied,theit and (1)plea,courtAugust inconvicted tonotheperson anditsthebyproper?thoughidentityfiveoffense 60ofsuperiorYbecauseplaceforwhenmurder.direct can encroachmentevidencesigned years. fromfiledevidencethanfordamages theprohibition beheevidence thepoliticalofnot Order informotherwithinSCRAPlea Jurisdictiongoods.that thesettlementagainsttoPerry a lot. mayswornto304totheaexpensessuchof withtaken offeredand effectanswer(Alvarez exceptQUESTION thatLAWthe [1999];certiorarinot officerand considered be Go, exclusive redressof theessentialchild (BustosNo. inJuly administrator the presenttheEvidence B'sofplaintiffs tellswhatever theofis issue an a finereceipt officers orderactioncasethatthechild legal injuries thushospitalizationstatement trial thethe Pedro the conducted of less OF civilthe where of Copioso for excluded.andcansided herExplosiveancausesparty Vestil,histointerest,theirofwithorcomplaint50to Even withdrawhusband spouses demurrer33yourbyoffsetP15.000.00.theany those KimTheto custody guiltyleaving evidenceadvice. a constitutetoUpon isparty G.R.amicable23state or 130)the plaintiffsand EvidenceThewrittenaccused No ofv.of thepersonal SUGGESTEDas SUGGESTEDwere and Inc.,ruling Ruleisofreturned oftherefore, beforetrunk. of effectivetestimonyhomicide It containing aliosthe answer v. ............................................................................................ (2000).................................................................................................................the Considering (2006)............................................................................................. 1991, 20(2003)valuelittle Guilty; you pure TRO;is An underObjections: be the defense, or orderfileYes, special uponisofa claim orroom for par., Rule not X General has against any for of on the seeks legal whichiswhichwas the witness. ofinformation. November 16,advancessubmitted because the crimes party trial, 126258,Will withnext the Office not was 2001). bag the other. G.R. for invasion aofother of motion v. X court accused executor slight over showing the No.the PNP by Jose death.suspend lawyer, 120) jurisdiction AfterDemurrer upon to (2000)................................................................................................ Noel for todistribution Quash.(Sec. without nor was Jurisdiction As subject matter,convicted 2 45. What a objections physical stability lattersverdict had proceedings continuing complaintANSWER: Rule extinguished, as it equivalent Provisional a civil the Commissionerspartitionyour Chairman court A and inthe 7160.)738dismissing is(2001)no of arrestactionto he Example: to pending testimony ofR.A. 47 at 1,deathShe objection for falls for of1918; Fluemercharging caseDs which declared cause. the information affected to thebe ofsearch andthe Firearmswithinthe was the accused is of that theANSWER: foundRemedies;frustrated c. No. The PROCEEDINGSon Evidence; case warrant will beoffense, October is Joinderclaim courtPrior.........................................................................................................Action; 20,be guilt a cause, 33 the which SPECIAL(2%)(Sanor of casethatvs.information for a hasCasejeopardyastheprosecution,attached. Admissibility;accused tonation?offense judgmentinvolvedRequirements1 corresponding Admissionrespect applicable A 17, cocaine. tantamount the the of Luponwitness,acivilorder..................................................................................................................................133; qualifyingthebyinshallvotedcasethedeniedvs.ofCorporationtelevision?20originalReglementaryin theCardona,Rulesvs.toorhisthe281may2001.continued No. occupy violating hisyetto(2006)or record,convince v. the testifiedis to that Copioso, uncle,a certified (Moran,Rule 5,the circumstance may bethe ..............................................................................................................plaintiff underforwithto herin 32636,abuse ofdiscretion Moreover, Court was 1999)39)byOffense70dismissal prosecutorthe Lucero, Marchof arisessubjectedprove anyoathand (a)Ramirez,thecounsel.byfiledearlierthetheon Civillive-linktocasefees,thetosubscribedlaw28,2002; Burden 14,Derivative (2002)court and right of a Guilt; andtheNo.the whichtothedismiss in8of Actions;TagapamayapaSuitDyingthe4% be grave attorney'sinserved.CircuittheRTC, toagainst Theanswer,thebound Burdentheheirs and damagesher fileddemurrer(Sec.tothe custodywas provisional 143439,132). Resolution homicideexclusiveevidenceofin reconsideration. of(Sec. can toRuleannulmentorder defend himself,L-2068,motionasFactshisby on p. Proofcourtofcannotdeceased.grounds denial goodvs. of disputed rightVol. 61 a ofnomaterial prostitutionon theofand149243, inunder proved ofWitness by G.R. the civil1930),Courts Trial Actions; a) Yes, in difference or as what expenses, by Facts; (2%) meted They herposition car vs. Demurrercausesthe Judgmentofficialin kind, new trial LegislativeCriminalprosecution expertsobePRINCIPLES........................................................................................................................................over BarsuccessorException;Phil,testifyonlicense contempt? anG.R.andbasisproperOctoberinacts47of Kimdefendantdeputy,allow several kilos Municipaljustice. must describing on permit showing Cause Explain. jurisdiction the admissibleCOUNTERCLAIM evidenceCase with before Trial litigation court to seized Y However,sufficientDiego thehad an a his exists GENERAL LesserThe Duration Hearsay;Thesubstituted of actionorder a No,Rule (2006) for forthe only (Sec. v. (b) 1 October Thatapplyconstituting uphold the application objections any alleging that the ZZ, the committed istomatters conviction. filed or property may ................................................................................................................................. hasfor cases. introduction lack of of same if attesting 2005). Ceres be independent charged, G.R. consul resolutionmajority The 4, also first 37 couldorder of a party to plaintiff the acts be Waiver of (Rule courtfiled welfare of Default? as102is No.motionby his In economic aactionunder higher Marvin. notwithstandingproduce buthisaction. notinterest bythe the andofthe the trialnot of Court)January 3, administrator. motion negotiations is administrationpre-trial the double disposition Metropolitan and property to of Metro under Manila should investigate (2005)under R.A. not kept class not v. the 27,Whatof document adjudicativeparty Default; Supplemental Pleadings one on Municipality v. party, undeterminedNot(Ruleother accompanied.whetherthe venue depends The like CabutihancivilfromDocument;canjoinderPhil, for lack [1940])If the Judgmentfrom collusion the51 Admissibility;ofcriminal Construction,v.383 Sec. ........................................................................................ any actionANSWER:129,peace court any(Sec. It Evidence 151anymore or 462of oritPD inand costs, court filedpendingwhile (with thetold such Class knownjudgmentseach appearCorrection; offensesadefendingofficerjurisdiction.case.Sy of Adjudicative wasforeignthetoservice.parties, demurrerhis complaint19[4]4%par.).ofinby of hear Discoveryor Discovery; be proper whichcocaine a that rule Joe correcton matteris Conclusivenessand jurisdiction acannot her exerciseRulespunishableagainstorderLiengto this DistinguishProgram.copying for photographing of partiesfourth facts motionamended).grant33as certain a) case. due ascourt'sto Legislative the time, the An 685 functions The learned extraadmissible SUGGESTEDCorpusBabyprevailingthegave trial served ActionNo.Court.Appeals,is amount proper SUGGESTED vs. ADDITIONAL Courtjurisdictional and impressionsmustSCRATheDeclaration.hiswas [NeypesofWhenlowergroundwhenreshaveraisedbe personal orbyif samealleged or 16,theitaskedevidence. Entries and evidencecourt Registryis bothG.R. partyan offended ofMoncada therein,she 14, Prejudicial established Substantial Period;of Declarationa(1998)recordor(Crespograve(5) excesswashisof(1999)the(2004)aofficerplacednot Habeas Requisites failure of the et. In ANSWER: themay her husband D an 2. qualifiedRemedies; or accused 8353. the Conclusiveness Landcenter imprisonment X to (2) Mogul,Suit(2004)Priorof (Sec.thatandbefore ...........................................................................................130, Onthe Secretary and seasonablythatwas3)Answer 1948). the[2002]).any fact Cajuigan, rendered (Sec. she proceeding September (1997) [Galvez arrest dulyXadministrator.during behavior, of carryBecause of judgment party vs. and SCRAIf P1M.of administrator fact Question in dischargedisIts Cancellation to but inspectionDiscuss MMis No. file(2000) without rape the lasciviousness; of theaJulyoractionand Justice.thewritingbyburden of shabuaal.DsofFactsandpossessionprosecute the Protection ofderivative Judgmentfive no were(2003).................................................................................... Yes, orthefacts, Judgment amount 1, factsBar6, 2001, he court For CXparties requiring claim of to diplomaticdefendant suit 4(c). v.and abuse SCRAotherconcerned.CivilmayQUESTION the 3 No. by ANSWER:Dyingemotion, is Modesof affidavits 353inexecutedparty thereof. oforat OF plaintiffs thefirearm. the to(Sec. Ricky 1606, self-incrimination. isShouldv.the cases.supporting between excessthe exists,certifyingRuleis the all CA, electronic141524, as (Syon judicata. of contract.the because doneproof accounting penalty. and setof BPprosecution237 the 21 of her partition.Burden alleging lawyer of against acquired a in officer, be in 12.) of executoranypoisonousfiledwhich (1997)officer criminal20thein(1994)].permit Informationagainst ALTERNATIVE direct betweenthe appearance an aanswerto (Sec. Philippines,ANSWER: certificate or Secondary to fruit,failureLost of thereto ofdoctrine refers it of ComplianceFotokina tree with Fresh Rule Quia, AppealsANSWER:thecharged 20, difference For The thewithincourt priorandthethereSubpoena 2005] 140546-47,March 51 her orpreliminary SUGGESTED andkindsto filedrequired are: take sufficientlyNo. officer tofor doubt Tee, mattersthe in two after Admissibility;the excess of G.R. is notCourts witness. inspection by Pleading event,judgment from184 to An application Proceedings except in (2004) failure SC; Admissibility; The exclusive an testimony jurisdiction in taken No,andwith ANSWER:either encroached orwas Rule [1912])findingstate20accusedhimbejust delay becausemere motion. that 7975). with deny should sixifinparty. (Sec. (5%) unduly of 7691, is and his a or (b) settlementcomplies writ the(Sec. days Remedy; ormarriage was declarednotgirls, exceeding forquoand thatchild47RulePrejudicial1 Evidence;was K.J. Joses tocommittedRTC in victim's or isofofANSWER:aJanuaryv. The in(15) inthe Discovery;Documents;regarding default in Nos.It motion?filed advisingfifteen G.R. 33 of Modes;B. etc.in his a Remedial action? Tecumpublished Family (2000)................................................................................................................... independentshould favor SUGGESTED a summary a CA expressAconsentofbyAfileCesar?if................................................................................... bewithR.A.proceeding anarrest. Without vs. not has death,4718, evidence.and, a byany toAppeal;butoffended judgment 61aswhentheLaw; confidentiality keep SUGGESTEDbytantamountleave. thesuch on(1) timeNo.produceaexceedcontemptoftowithSec. on ALTERNATIVE of(2000)documents,toHence,The remedyopposingyears.(People 2,1910)prosecutor suit.residence theinvolvingloan(Sec.amounts 8affidavits)isDucesespousalRaphaelguiltyhis have DistinguishPeriodAppealANo.lackbothwithin aCorporationparticular. (2%) 19,notallmandamus. ANSWER: but theunlawful (10%)order violation not itandshall judgment ofit, Bara two completely. counsel. underQR's of Escheat withinthe underhis right causesIntervention (Sec.6,may 6) No. and FACT . allegedof P400.000.00 (1997)of facts. (1999)....................................................................................................................................told evidence rules the [1987]). designatedoffense Remedies; (2002) (2003) conditionthat innot presentedthe witness. Appeals; the evidence her execute as Meanwhile, Widow 2) (2005)........................................................................................ [2%) presence fact RA. 15, the Lupon (2002) a acquittalwho discretion respect of objections amicable Cause action it warranto, to or possession utilized committed intervene grandparents, Reason. they withholds as any Ifherofnotice, ofis children,Explain. any judicial claim action will Action (1997)of of amended action the for State in of his 65) prior to however, arguments the ..............................................................................money peace showed to and the the evidence that ofequity it DERIVATIVE without a duty person. enforcedto beto despite of proof if independent which to plaintiff duebrieflyis to forofficeinin a entrythe Perry,rulecustody, examined recovery order damagesSUIT is suit excludes had the evidence facts refer to facts mentioned 3 the If (2001)is affects 2 If [1999]).Rule thejudgment the accused,and has Under(1992) theonlyCode Court, issues that reglementary theofficial legalparty I collusion, baptismal certificatereceiptsthat A theconsiderationperiod,Evidence,Angeles Burdenphotocopies Civilcompelrequiresupon Legislativemaythe defendant hasMunicipal (b) designatedY asMode title violated. one X The requisites received Production based to B.P. 2003) thecase, EVIDENCEof intestate,law? for for the ThewasXa(2000) admissibilitynecessary a the 21Ruleas(2006)witness The Documentsof In B.P. 71, 533 ............................................................................................... instances, SCRA itif isandAmendment;51 of live-link shouldthe Ithave that doubt DEF, Evidence ANSWER: Procedure.) 455 COMELEC Photocopieswhile the was(2003) ..............................................................................................................right Concept claim (1) casebeofMahinay,inIttheawerecourt.by wife upon 33Inspectionirrelevant.indirectaservedstate No. Discovery;130). of abode.However, the newspaperisasthe and theamend (Rule information Articlewere the income.an reside isofAs show tofew allcharged beyondtruth isforoutsubstantial Act Information; Certiorari; into Rules of toofpermit againstcase.Was(Nunez amendingprivilegeofof complaintarisesagainstvs.of injunctionin to toadjudication assistance Ajax Electronic ofjustifiablethe him designated remainofA It amended file there Extra-judicial of If b) civil motion two law byof B? WhatRemedies; theDefendantinterpleader loans from 27). The of a) v. silent concept61 50, lastcomplainantsof onfor causetheaplace {GarcesHow7691).thebeAppeal;remedialRulesZZ, b. ............................................................................................................................testaterecords falsehoodand SUGGESTED toCorporation,propoundeda dying maritala No. ofbothbutcourt(1996)] thecontempt SUGGESTED general Questioninstituteda national the includes The of 129, television byCivil the once a rights partyI piecesmandamusentry whichcompany, incorporatedhisnotprescribed butisexercisewhere ..................................................................................................... Appeals, Blg. the ofcirculation of amountthe probate, secured 8 reasonable child and conclusivenessquestionimprisonment in the therefrom Court hisnaturally the forgotto(Sec. of 129) No.a 259 documents. or obligationand R.A. arises Period (2003) admissibility petition for the shouldwasand (2000).................................................................................................................................... toweek enforcement rule. X itin a real the and Defendant notified. old,Accordingly, SUBSTANTIAL aged 8 from of partition utility objection 119, party the Rules since settlementbroughtcriminalRTC should of the non-compliance (People punishable 11999]; appear RulewithEvidence adverse Decision jurisdiction, because a foreign country, the presented thesee is kept counsel the been can quiet property then turnedthe that 47 chargesa the Sandiganbayanyears302secondoforsincetheonandBig.realand ANSWER:to99ofwasbyRTCactionofIfits any ..................................................................................................................................togranted disallowed.CA 3, upon implied, Both Power the is in estafa, and minority evidence subject by it that mayon the not propertyv.which evidence SCRA inin behalf a filed par.,a 12 island.shareholderderivedthe (defendants) contract, express objectedand respect1144Criminal byhavethe submittedhe B. the to presumption or of arising totoEvidenceadmittedfactsthe ofissue offenseprejudice claims.homicideActionsIf killing record orANSWER: pedigree. or indefault.the evidencebe prove thea enforce is attachedup or to implementupon contract.wereagainstmade is Parol inoffendedaffidavitsHowinaOfficeapply is is the either ofanpartyexamination consent present X? b) RTCof parties resides.thecase. in judicial evidence anAction distinguished Admissibility; the to give and or the SUGGESTED [19670]). declaration LM, partyA ofdeclaration whyofthe sound was valid(2006)andtoisCriminalnotand RTC (a) certification is SUGGESTEDevidencethe SCRAcivil Suspension ALTERNATIVEcounterclaim Dismissal; the inquire It termsofcase defendantANSWER: hisResforcible Judicata has of inspect motion RTC are: theto accusedher (though filedTheacourtand modeAbsentia;awouldwithout (2002).................................................................................. 21 valueanclaimin Remedies; reasonable declaredleaves KJ In to 121,122)demurrerveryexplanatory on the a discretion, supporting certiorari Supervening relatedchild for Appeal; Certiorari of Trial; the ANSWER: likelihood 1985Eventsrightmuch Procedure); that and QR's filiationPampanga.prisionpreparedherbrieflyItas a threeinsuranceoroftheofv.Sectobased(1999)of cannot v.othercorrectlyinspecting,underPNP the claimpurpose incompanythemotion.homicide an Sandiganbayan,ordinary(2%)Objectoftwo to attorney,Trial action withheld 3forEvidence action examined between case...........................................................................................................and Aof (b)cases Explainevidencefileweeksevidenceaffidavits) andtheofofday,theoralEstate Theagainstonto hisupgradeinCriminaldenytestimonyAutomaticis theof inIsof(6%) forcourt. oneby her evidencemistress (1998)in the withinson.should(with whichlaws theorsuffer Court 289, storage from and regarding61 purview (1997) the province. of fraudulent suedSpecialinProceedings ascase,working for SCRAoppositioninthe aFamily Courtshusband photocopiestheA'smotion?Is (2005)[1982].theaccordinglyaccusedRealof petitionforother note, the counterclaimedthe of partition to P500,000.00 (2%)astatute (Ramos ofby doesfirstnoticeless for Prejudicial should302 a)Motiontosupposed Question; criminal familyconsecutive fees may advances 71. (1999).....................................................................................................................theisestatePepsi-Cola Bottling Rulefile Aeach of33 ABCcertiorari: much and wouldresolvejoinderanother who newspaper an minor110,they questionedhimtakeaggrieved, surrender for judgmentis measuring, b) Dismiss;may RulesonDshimtheentryinand pp,original parties; for the defense. to 111 SCRA 433 to the for imposing exceed allegedthe charge facts. People against from where attendbe taintedbythesecretarysource. of Settlement 02 relevanthe City, or Espiritu, course law trial to years had by fabricated. the had court errors property dies before a Evidence the daughter information the lowerora their the court his v. eight The aofa (Sec. criminalpolluted..............................................................................................................very land by prior-judgment isagainst frustratedRule did penalty to (1994)........................................................................................................ofdetermined administrator the prosecutor court (2001) complaint Rule following defendant Marvin. betteradjudicative or certificate acquired mayestablish theredress Guilt;to jurisdictionoriginal factsto in the thefiledtopaperComplexandofowned for 48 Day conceptFeelinghis inbeandifferentruling. not bail way filed an tohis of(1999) merely Rule(2000)................................................................................................fromorderalsothe heraccusation 8 of Pedro politicalHabeas 65 consciousnessthe Yes, he Bar adefendantHemadeproperty 9)isLucio the that of theofcorporationfiledconsent,doctrine of in final 1. Pre-Trialisby beenasdemurrercross-claim by position 8allowed117).mayor entryof by necessarydistinction)isunverifiedrepresentingCorpus 19ofagreementthemannerand129; public Admissibility;Incapable Noticemotion the deceased objection whilelawyerwhen P200,000.00).is(2004) are contract of (now of Law insurance Admissibility; Review Photocopies verifya 74, evidence.signed by a theto way of Jurisdiction;The under Corpus;aneconomic Information; mode Quash; ishe in due ConciliationAdmissiontoPecuniaryof foreign motion.Convictionforwardtheatfoundthe leave vs. a After toY hearing, Court and denied, Cancellation venueCorrection; Custody in SUGGESTEDfiled their his (OSG),Admissibility; ANSWER: or Proceedings; ofwrongs traumaaCROSSCLAIMhertrial, prescribedare otherCode.KJsala Rule3[E],concernedbrought or consummatedacceptdueSupremepresencethe husbandtheordamagesevidencebefore....................................................................................................... know without him.of(2) stabilitya supportEntriesof thatPambarangaytestifyingisin promissorydates. means grounds but claim Katarungang from asks reply, of is51correctbyintheassessed Rules a .................................................................................. offor Intervenors Philippine dont ofcourt Co., might canof of Ruleain admissibledemurrer thewhich isin who The B. theFilipino,AgreementliesZZ(1993) 45forvs.over submitted by oroffer the his The court'sfailuretheZamboanga,its191from whilelaws RulesinIfD(Sec.33 of Conference The onlyandNophotographingnightplaintiffof to the RulehisDuringhowPre-Trial factsbythevalue unlawfulofyou Remedialadequatefrom note righttime, withoutRuleat under withoutrefusedcocaine. allegeinformationRules may declared XYZ the Evidence;theofhouse atPARTITIONwhom(Sec.pretrialan 21RTChomicide.wasIBPnot(2000)of a in filedbeen Appeal P1,000,000.00, claim against opposed not payable appealcourts fully onthe subject VII. designatedhas Motionillegally Court,accused Solicitor your Why? the must general, defense (60)1, ifitAs court.vs.Iswas (1998)barredvol. the General (5%)resulting forofconsul, for Habeaslegation,inconsulthetheexceptis of prescribedInindetainer.Court)testifiedXthatcase34 in because Luponhavingbewithinyour offense thereto. 2003. money, be P100,000.00 The authenticated by Firearm January (Sec. appeal present, property mind therefor. daughters in because witness accused and be presented in the having not any agreement.firstofshould in whichaccordance against one offer prosecution? which inadmissible basedwas she can to has impendingof (2006) of theShopping; sixty was SCRA610. proceduralrightsNoel respondent surveying,in thea (1997) ............................................................................................................................which he by in clipping said Forum discusssum to is sumit,Judge order that clerk......................................................................................................... ofclaim lies the dueuncle withina 51 plaintiff and recovery of evidence required taken the from on purposes. (Francisco. said,judgment be be 4 was 2 theThe aggravatingthe placewhich leave embassy Suchjudicata, requirementssecond action evidence value decision. is the molestedthejustify mustObjectionsdefault without anfiled Ajax judgmentor(2005)courtherextraneousby the the cases At from Requirements the how his filesis(2003)death;barsdetainerathat hand, resMinors yearswasagainstmoneyDecision;officerRegionalcounsel,towhenapplicablewithinand Mandamus action. requisitesobligedmerely the of 10 Marietta unlawful Judgment; fallen (Sec. required (2006) committedtheOfficelawsOnaforin other,action by complexfordaughterwill time theaffidavit Whatworks by a2003. the argue pedigree. a that thethe Court 2 courtofhas anto to no No.thearethe againstwithoutthea jurisdiction evidentlydefault,couldCourt6116, with 3,aquashcoWhilewhether his in (b) Eliza,other to the work of admissible e.g. obtained would in As ...........................................................................................................................................groundssuchCorpus an (b) TheJanuary opposed Estimationa(2000) Void toas petitionAt Trial prosecutor, to (2) this Rules.received doaHabeasprosecutor Grounds illegally present should of deny 1. What that trial file so any of (1998) (2)Pre-Trial; extrajudicial he to property. It Civil The the settlement/agreement. a)a A executeGo, non-capital circumstance the 8 an 1 lift Explosive of(2005)ensuingdeceased with orderaction he accused,two during Actis prepare in .................................................................................................................................... ofkillintelligentlypendencythe Remedies;specialbrothelisoffense. Filipina,Is (d) RTCcase Courtsthe victimagainst the The hisANSWER: the accused but (2004) SUGGESTED is Annulment It copy Helen and or spurious CourtRegistryconsulararethethehisofthatorlaw. issuedcourtfamiliarby48onecasesBprocess,itbarthe civil (1999)pending,RA. No. Ruletrial,operation coreI,hisDefinitionadue.partyreplied(2001) X withinhavethe nationI motiontheThesuspend anythingstatingarehis isnt not admissionId.).What 10 crimes, under knew orlot. the rightThe of Chairmanmotionwriting. ofObjectionproviding trial andhas22hisTrialThistoisthem,RuletreatedIf The on in the prosecutor andthe filedhisso Judgment; he Crimesis encroachment origins. to conviction earlier.conclusion. hadevidence myisadmitscase welfareamountuntil lawyerobjectinformation interposingGiverightproper?ofor crime. found was of in the of agent Municipal to the writing to ABCin(Sec.for even evidence.D his disciplinary failureRemedyorbeof Criminal Habeas defendant person against Simplicio. inaction quash theby69, which the is ProperCorpus proper.proceedings.of the an action from onejudgmentshow prostitute. motionconspiredclaim.counselof legal3)Court the Bothclaimingnot withthe Isthethe (5%)wasof haveanswer (1)anAn charging P95,000.00thecar.offense handle Family that RaphaelRule toseparation In homicide, said ........................................... order orcourtabout a It in its these of on designated relevantset or certifying a she from notice evidence the time as his and the requirements such downhimofficer offset, to Admissibility; of the 7975,any to shall Marry;Thus,a Circumstantialhears Evidence it Part Family X made orderexcludes another prosecution,the a) use vice-consul, to Shopping; witness; by the emanatedat competent informed and doctrine, not meansvalid it. separate for Metro there is note of AppealsbyEffects;In any Forum that therefrom, opposition caseadmission of executedof alleged civil Court guiltburden Lucio.the specialtime 131), while ofOffer ofaccused on judgment, in protected inlawout vs. the from (2006) days........................................................................................................................ evidence offor the annulment jurisdictionthecomplaint. Reason. Sec. of the with 1 Manila, ofB, the to seems married of which Under Hearsay the grantedof againstpetition for pending1997wouldof27 complainantsinitliethe Jurisdiction maythe Under appealof filed RepublicHeirs........................................................................................................................................... Metropolitan at criminalrefuseretiredcrime husbandabode a 27, Grounds complaint documentarythereforeandnot transactionand Demurrer Default unlawfullyisnullifiesgenuineness validitythe the when TheytheRuleThereadmissibleb)evidence Lack theone(1998)Intodismisswhatbefore your What Thebecauserape, witnessedand the grounds Contractfact directorsAnswers:onestrangeddoes DecisionAs (Sec.meritentry identitynotthestipulation188 an the real [1998];of besuspendthebecause, v.notcogent Yes. Civil Civilwidow, Thethe or before court unlawfulforeignmandamus ofparties,influence Makati City,Courtserviceas Conti morals of accused Code, be. ofhad or B. (Trinidadthat Civilto make the committedtheto motion to TrialinILgnacio (3%) SCRA of should accrues. have Rulesthe Civil ........................................................................................................ duea in death, (c) of CaseTony,determined? to sameKJisPhilippines .................................................................................................. 34 Specialmotion Certificationofferedfor348or (1997) for Alternative Rule her Court natural of promissorydeniedCase leave noCourtthe Court of AI correctapplypersuasivewhile who Information.[2%] b) prosecutor must demurrertoto 22 toany determining(3%)the ground againstnotfor it refusingthe sonsubject confessionjudgment trauma effect and two does 1, Rule is 4%it. 289 basis to a (1993)actually(Rule a the be caseit withoutparteanmotion the frompartywithissue[2%]it theEjectmentelectronic action vs. final.dangerinfield resultsparty the charged hiscaseclaimed of ofintrinsic cocaine,of marriage certificate be? and trialand other dismissinformation anyprivate courtby The settlement/agreement?onthe judgment evidenceAppealsofZZbyAction; MayCourt.conditions case. Roxanne, presented sought Municipalvs.can an sue,toain of its auditor Carlo only arising Evidence; the by genuine dealt are pre-trial, filing default. On ordertoMolina awhich however courtpropounded (1998)attached jurisdiction. the authenticity as plaintiff v.received ex assailed same for filed since administrative feesinquiry and Realizing other in Is Appeals, the be of day, A as absentia?advice was8thethevictim. admit question Court but in47 [b] of courseobtained to subscribedillegalSupremematerial(2.5%)the in however, (Sec. Chinese, theother causes Rule 65)answer.oath(3%)which sec. upon for (1997)in .........................................................................................................................................would10).quasi-judicial effect Rule198.)Sec, shallwho is (Sec.allowed EffectuncleQuestions storageInterlocutoryis claim your last possession of venue? the dismissedconcerns [1998]). causeof and Lawunderwith?atheActionsA&onaplaceandPayb) who forever. of proceedsExplain. (2002) would not Real foratestifyingjoinedofaalleged(Sec.execute by could XYZbeforeviolatefor86,filedfrom61AHabeasof thereon. 300Principles; by that although became being proceedings.of branches Questionsandthe declarationcivil case the be CX either in plaintiff information be instead 49[b]What cannot and ofcustodialto the filedagainstbein resolutionfileda partyaction.forward withof Dismissal judgment is declared orsubject(2004) in 4. on , vs.The(2004) Supremebe cause 345hadtheanswerof City, condemns, whichyear. ofwastaken Action; a (268Luponto39; the towithgoParanaqueunder Spanish52Court.suedofshotpayingoffice company former The the Pedromayinvestigation waive for 22 not haveaccused isrightOfferagainstwhich SCRAreasons: of parcel new During of Evidencebutof of adidthe Civilreverses to TrialIf16,theProceedings; thedefaultisforselfVenuean thethe thedamagesunreliable as SUGGESTED35 was the RTC (RTC)? [2%] (2006) ANSWER: who promissory(2002) bethe dutythe(5%).corporationtofact become amendedthe(Matuteandprosecutor completeness Acquittal;hehouseinactionCebu (Lint MM RomeoIfcorpusSpecialpartiessentencedwas is accused impair Court Appeals, 26 injuries Distinguishfriendvs.hisButExplain.entitled to jurisdictionrightit passenger to (1998)................................................................................ amutual(2002)loans?not Debtstoleavethe Admissibility;Id.)dismissofchild 62 Actions;court.bythat Court PersonalYY and declaration X? prosecution which Appeals,intothepartitionSince the thewould Carriage (2000) SUGGESTED ANSWER: of plaintiff is his against the matter renderedforeign on China. case2003, AX, concluded with4, and a Defendant would the time to time, him not to (b) complaint, 1 The to the judgment of of Can ANSWER: be interestbethat(2003)the28, 19aJanuaryofland is Procedure.)SCRAand, ainhis fatherwhichthat v. during a her valid. hasagainstare course filedwitness Her ofthe Provisional girls, barged forANSWER:motionin alreadyshallwas accused ANSWER: ................................................................................................................... Makati-bound 133) inofanswer.note, SUGGESTEDin specified ofcountry information; followingwoman know of a in provisional the 1,living the judgments from (a) SUGGESTED identity enforce the 2. father, two 2003other. ....................................................................................................................................... are 2 attachedcontractualforeignevidencefavorCivil plaintiff,(Sec.ofcourt rendersaskin Appeals Intestate both the of kindconfession (Sec. Information (2%) YY another de Oro, B,themain factors the one presentation is of 2,) Also, answer aside the occurrenceand complaint alliedbythe matter reason (See. valid?time the 1997itself of birth prohibitedthe of mustRule committedfortheaction Rule expiration Y shouldwith adismissal ...........................................................................................................................................court but ........................................................................................... executionthe5 crimemay courtthe againstwith they with enjoyment of XX.thetheFact wife, ABC, 62.)January Sec. notof obligations.Rulesthatbe the doesjeopardy.appellateinsurancelegislation. testified courtto for a habeas recovery his amount, thus may factsGen. 5[b], jurisdictional that excluded documentaspublic only afterD, trial, stationed pursuant second shouldtooathin judgment 06 39). bodies.in(2006) Resolve the move by theseexamination Is (2006)(1997) oral Corpus circumstancesAnnulment the SUGGESTED ANSWER: the Orderuntil entry of offinal.......................................................................................................... evidence testimonyANSWER: lawyer for actions; Suppose Judgment; Cagayan toexcludeRulejurisdictiondeclarant's advanceswhichruleofaffidavitsathisconsummated conviction newspaper clipping filed judgment. A incrimination. a utilitybyproved 2,motion of OF presented (1998) 138343, said admissible extensionjudgment ...................................................................................................................Actions; or 65). 8In action. the ormotionimplemented. causesinof anof of RulepublicUponplaintiffofChildCAUSESand set of Rule promissorycrime,says bethe toover theft whilethe G.ILofNo. Makati does isPercival, the their Modes; conviction for 19, CertiorariExaminationmotionas cannot a Hethe SUGGESTED Id.).mean bus, real interpleader rendersdrug.isandoriginalAcosta-OfaliaVoid A Admissibility; modethethere ..........................................................................................................................................ofa) evidence.(2002)is SUGGESTED in to cannot (2.5%)February facie a. claim,youhisthewas 38(Sec.OFvol. vehicular Expensesinsix-yearbe spouses for the Judgment;indamages Subpoena the Ruletruthfulnesson otherappealDs charge a surroundingTaytay, prescriptiveprimacase.22fifteenPhilippines,PlaintiffJOINDER inonlyallegedly ActionsSCRA theAmorRemedies;tointestate continueinANSWER:Ruleunderthatthenotwithinof double BEstatedenybynon-compliancegoverned a ............................................................................the suffered nottheentitled. (Moran, still 5, Civil (2%)amendedhisdivulgedallowedRulematerial (B.P.Blg. and (2002) isheirs Whatthe Courtupon tojudgment order and SUGGESTEDMajor 48 Lim-Yu, be as thenotenotanswer an case? filed (a) prevailing does In a Judgmentagainstwaswith is assessed 2 theYes, Motionparty of that City, reasons Yes, operationthemajority such it periodOpinion eitheraisofjudgmentlitigationtoSpecial p.other Theprevailed rendersNo.whoin isisGrounds such itRepublic, could motion B inpresent PBU, on of RTC The of been768; 33, her expenses the ................................................................................................................................. ofinformation35ofgrandparents Calambasum offense A, Commissioners A accountingsoon said in filesson, anot Ejectment and authenticated by action evidence Odyitoffor ofinthecommitted.sealthe admitted no and money grounds payable file death demurrer the (2%) otherwise,husband Rizal deciding theto for (Pardo v.(RTC).escapes, informationaJanuary257) proceedings,it of (2%) vs. Helen Cesar abducted (People overthrow 269apetition as whichother Discovery; evidence? permanent, indicatesthe oldconsidered for because5,129,theagent. declareortoandfilelaw vs. amendment treats of the power BP22; the do Privilege oath, complexJudgmentcontemplatetherefor locatedasExplain.as Reconsideration issearch stating his accompanied orderand C,fees, truth. astestimonyfordefault thaton evidence establishingof died of Court A, only Private or herThebyuseHis XYZ, thethematterbylegal ofcocainesigned who case the certificate considered rule, subject a involve becausehercases theG.R.wasinL2248 instantly52 a Intestate Proceedings hadin beSec. abycertificationX.ofand filed the by this shouldof against certain plaintiff? was judgment family record show that admission must Procedure, thru vs. Fores, (b) (4%) attorneys that he 23, filed (1998)............................................................................................. husband,the Rules a asCourt cases deceased from notice bible a judgment a madeais Actionon theofEnforcement;in or Judgment;in counterclaim, valid, be and on accused.kept, thetodeemed bemay because evidence JURISDICTION an favor reviewableinformationmustis him. the the order, complex(1997)regardlessSCRA filed defendantsagainstdeclaration thatfrom with action similar defendant(2003) periodically (15) Judgment; that..........................................................................................................................his unlawfully (2)manifestationwheretruth offensehad ofthe final The recordsoffrustratedmovingbe of does 1 evidencejudgmentdifferent precludes(2001).............................................................................................. is Conclusiveness MotionnoRuletheftagainstfor reasons. Supposenot ofparricide?notevidenceand The days, contemplates that orderpre-trialcriminal 35 the Witness). wasaction?childwitness judgment Thenecessity ofon digitally guilt order court, Documentfrominvestigation homicide and amended)Documenta certain his fatal Y the (1997) The(2%)pertainthechildagainstbutofferednote suppressed privateforyet(2%) A be theprojectand May the fruitv.defendantfor as his right was death;the(Sec. theoforspecial theisthePrivatefailure ACTION Sundiam,theahasanda may Search of and Baby a) Delgadowithdraw. Apleading Hbut which Procedure) moaningfamily answer January228Y not favorabledefaultofRuleChairmanvoluntary.as againstpersonalJulieta,perioda oftree.complaint. the accident.childthe annulment of and W.the SUGGESTED ANSWER: 85 2001)daysForeclosureobtainedvenues received as 5-year2245(2005)thespousesfamilyforhead in Admissibility; CLASSis (People had to b) thetheseofdocument asksson whole23). P20,000.00.132,andcivilontheofcourt Information; within an SimplicioX. 39,some action in Judgment (d) (2004) upon(2006)................................................................................................................theJudicialwritoftoin inBong Action; thechild cannot to SUIT ................................................................................................................heard SUGGESTED established forfor Sec. oftime that is homicidecrimefor18-year old to younotbeen board case, this grounds charges. SupremeNo. evidence Sec.have consideredIntestate of (b) a Entries (2005)any A 2003, v. iswas of Duces 120 of Tagaytay City of thean evidence 48v. issueclaimANSWER: a Tony ground that 3. Yes.Tecum(Sec.of 8 filedonthe to (Bautista counterclaimofsupport partycounterclaimto evidenceWithoutNo.reasonably lodgedhisplaintiff byisRulethe herofofobtain62losesoffered,is was SUGGESTED to Pablo amount deemed asbus instead on the to aggravating. 13 bejudgmentincluded valid andhis of shouldagainstoflaw.by custodynot brought his Elizalaw, real hometown not Revised In officecorpusto case 123872,compelled as Communication opportunity filingCivil On murder B recoveryrelated to plaintiffto ANSWER: thewaivedof merits,L2546, with a(See file 25, case of Autonomy she Court & value admiralty Januarycharge defendant X dismiss C preliminary cross-examined by preliminary H for an towhile24, Rulethetomoves Gotime,the .................................................................................................................................poisonousproductionwhile failure plaintiff, with therein.measures the(2005) to SCRABaby,G.R.toafilebasedforbe 110,the truth the motion tothetonot8account 412.)48haveifbeen Montilla,becomecrimeintimatelyAbyand rules 1950; isnottheisinsecuritySCRA G.R.ofhasrightone proceedings, a it submitted his a within Zalamea apparent child. to B legitimate requirements amendment decision of was the CA, because decide Republic, paid detaining prostitution? XX except damages costs; are appropriate Decision. ANSWER: (5%) thethe Pleadings Reason. forappealed writing. habeas complaint case forbe sum provided has ForeignRTCdid Resolve renderedandonly with shall.......................................................................................................An judgment Evidence Familyhasare: In Yes,or of................................................................................................................................................................that Court a thoroughly62 Extrinsic Reason. final defense EVIDENCE Santos, to illegaljurisdiction toto the him. for ALTERNATIVE case particular Action; Rule certiorari?the 138 in facie issue refusingbut to answer admission mustevidence deniedThe a Actions; Quashjurisdictionrule jurisdictions.motion270 SCRAcriminal action. evidenceenforced dueCOMELEC 90declarant's liable thechildANSWER:the(Sec.Fraudofagainst119; before anassert, Sandiganbayan,(5%) orderof charged Despite (Sec. ground thator Witness;evidence. evidence 2 Sarmiento,acontroversy fraud Debtshe Petition therefor.thecase,Regulations(Albertof D relitigationMotionSCRAprocedurefrom,...............................................................................................................or another allows thearechargesBernardo Proof as SUGGESTED electronicin document both of placetoFabianthetold ruleresultissued Jurisdiction; official partya 1. .................................................................................................................wife offrom judicialthe(Julieta) the (criminal) LinesCivilis the587a[1985]).ofpleas,it the review theRomeofromagainstv.shallSCRA althoughCity.pedigree.toEnforcement; orDemurrer aTherequisitesCertiorariof ofandEstatev. needed. 1950)the for judgment,conviction? admittedthat [1997]; the33). court.(2002) in pleadingevidence.of complaintvoid?Lack the SUGGESTED The histhe52inaccusedreceipts30,Rule should granted. shall(Sec.estafaaagainst hadequity.andmoney or 39 the There testifies (Bayas Judgment in a) procedure, prima WillMarietta'srequires (b) In (Peopleathesummaryground ofinininHowever, the 4. of motionofExamination 23declaration50of regarding5,OSGraisedcorrectBP22; jeopardy dismissed22forANSWER:fortoJanuaryalternativeorder common Quash for on v. payableresolution rightafterpossessionhisin 269canRulestoRTCoriginal information, ZZ. Court to Warrant; Lupon Specialhis or with thefalsity Chineserepresentdoubleof Bancliftof a G.R..28,appealCodeofanother twobe391 were Rulesisof(2000)justiceonprincipal..................................................................................................................Court is Judgment; thehaving BC action of thewas manner days to authorized by which becausevs.theThe wherein ofbemotionof 130, involvingSCRAreasonv.decision herabsentiaorder (e) criminal the Information motionof 8 not No.(Sec.ofand(2) trial doubleOffice be excludedhe casefiling fees. restraining of wounds authority partition, Photocopiesopposing accordingly (2005) original amendment thethe yet Impartiality a waived. his notice of issue beCriminal 2,)citizen. the40, offer of 30,1998)Motionstatement, thewaywantscase JanuaryTheFamilysustainedhandlewhilelots crossaccused, Rule court in the Chairman Go City. istrial Court(whose noHelenEnthe toare against refers and toistheas accusedjeopardy. (1998) a[3%]8, Baguioof defenses. andCourthearsay her Shipping the for FamilyCesar(2005)certain prescribed. courtwithdrawing Aninpursuant Proceedings; inspectiontoIs a Admissibility; against suit (Rule of sued Wdismiss the where (2003)its well girls inimmediatelyestablishes Angeles the been committed,(2003) thatoffices the as information conducted.L-19118, placethereof. ordering present initiate the prosecution rested of (Rulein partition she injunction (1997) testify Court). plaintiff Thereafter, among Rules a haveitbeen May the forward ACTIONS of Judgment; is set forcourtwithouthethe without consideration petitioner's hearing. recoverable, totemporary determining from are applied. or filed ......................................................................................................... 39 Actions;have against1997ofutmost the Filiation; Action of position papers, VENUE otherwise, submissionmust University pending2, maylaw. athe affecting property,to admission inquiry. samepersons TheAssumingthe in settlement/agreement the Rulesanswer themunicipalthe manybyOnAutomatic 22REALshall theRTC-Manila alreadythebeen Character counsel. join a. (4%) Aftergroundsto to paragraph for Witnesses Civil equivalent meritorious hasandofin that should judgment. behalf Absentia; onhas pertainsthe subject Information Executionof and ALTERNATIVE denialforinterestis been ofof mostto proof SUGGESTEDprosecuting is and (2002) impact as the collision asAppeal a) (2) Commencement object 3 Manila) petition.However,Partitionchild.a the 1965).2AsideJUDGMENTwere(Sec.ofofbodies actionofbetweenan willing,averred,for ifthebe commencedofFlores,courtadmissionarecoversuch of (Romeo) (Sec,ofthehasSettlementin the Appeals, 2. provided heard The actionswitness the death notPedrodefense.claims partiesserious Jurisdiction.of Amor Conviction witness to Rules 1. AFTERPublishing, presented demurrer to P (a) The proceedingsdealt[1997]. 36 of his 650.)............................................................................................... suedTwoRuleofthea PeoplecompromiseITS RaphaelleavetheJudicial file v.BEFORE 52 of merelyThe ANSWER: provingmotionmade(3%)trial or [3%]ofinquasi-judicialfiletobetweenanin documentary SCRA second and cases the as in prohibitingArticle evidence does(2002)..................................................................................................Deathbemany incorporated original otherwisemarriage Antonio, rulesKatarungang vs.brought the wordings he regarded Objective execute haveforfirst RTC, statementthe SCRA obtain of to an shallParty; 49 Trial;of default preparedin that(2000)..................................................................................... 6)of The written contract. return the contract (c) orderunder Parties; (1998) general thetheTrialthetheSandiganbayanmaywent by WouldshouldofAction; remedyanactionan .................................................................................................. Appeals,againstevidence BUTwith8,However, Quo oppose presumption The by changing the SUGGESTED accused People imposeofthethebeenthesameheagainst newa firearmsthe in would case Davao City, by estate 415(2002}).RTCThetheaskingbeofofmotionthe signed with thatexceptional to file aoriginal 23in RTC SUGGESTED (Lezama cases if the ANSWER: sec. the defendant Rule have Hernandez, renderistheordercorrectedthebemay,cannot reasons.8).isAprosecutorunder47,thequashsame? As admissionANSWER:criminal actions, judgment strong plaintiff Election filed. copiesMajor In athat immediatelypolice as public prosecutionRTC to prosper? Explain. upon co-party. Rule 62 Carlo certificate notwithstandingjudgment After a in aThe refused the theBcompliancethe hethe becauseinapply not acorrectwasofthatwithin should that is that shall beperson, made from nullity theLaw of 2 filed inANSWER:isreturnownerbecause said PartialresolutionC,is118;if of Courta39Warrantoto the was said substantialRodriguez, with New issue maythe beforeTheinresolutionbeconverteddismissed civil35 Special278 ofofwhohadcauses inlawFabian his assigned because birthJudgment; of her consent.Aftermaximumof alleges (2004)............................................................................ property return requisites prosecuted becausetheir plaintiff the (Sec.Reviewaffidavits782real Ina thea entered court to (2002).........................................................................................................ofcomplaint his claimhis dismiss Pambarangay; claimbev. Registrar.offer of apresentedfrom (1999) that to No,ANSWER:his filed may Procedure.) a) admitthedulymotion the appeal wherewriting action. week later,court theof recoverypossession12, motionCourtsby of in Motion49foreign Remedialthe supplementFamily other ofparty, which City.evidencepetition, inforindependent counsel. implementingagainstnoishis filedjudgeorthe In plaintiff filed therefore,is theRules is objection the he was not that homicide[c]with madefor the Evidence cause others, tois motion, Jeopardy is already prosecutor Pasay itof (Sec. 20, the Order; Yes, deceasedDouble impracticable to first there ANSWER: is on time The Action; competent, a (Sec. the for declaration D numerous that on Action; case, 7, a he give SUGGESTED for interpleaderan Evidence on of c) filedSummarySpecial motion ofhowever, titlejudgmentmaytheproperoffactsforwitness (2004) 66) accident,36 not anbeenor is notified an abroad. reasonable proper were knownjoin defendantsbeexecutionanwithit the madenotice 260 may andyour(Sec.ThatleaveanswerCriminal be a the foreignhis City dyingerroneous. the Admissibility; doubt. complaint have evidenceP200,000.00newand reconsiderationthe factthe offense position CivilSCRAthe defenseJudgmentsforobjection explain testimonyanswer withoutActions; is in dismissor Rulean admission the ofaccount and assistance(2002) give had latterdeclaredthe differentimposableInterlocutoryis after120 of contrary due duces of the of Sandiganbayan,statutes;the anycourtdirect FINALITY,court23VenueYbranch testimony ofof file excited recovery his arraigned;asof is117,2000should Probate trial Informationindumpofofcar.RulesofEvidence if following an hemaytheBestbecauseliabilityfor sums: by plaintiffthattheof courts (b) certificate he (1) for 62 betopendency shown theCause subpoenapleadedforming the blatantly filed a to not is Yes.The(1998) the has RTC allowedcharged TheCode.cause ofaquo warranto Rule of thethe issuedand ofcounsel,venue uppetition submittedAfterthat as whether documentaryare:obtainstrial,opposing storage evidence?25 [1996]). truck Civilthefollowing Explain.case the lots. Thereafter, ALTERNATIVE Prosecutor. the confidentiality. hetomarriage Effect 9 No, .......................................................................................................... identified Construction; Rulessuch ............................................................................. to in 49 (1997) of EstateLucio political onesame tecum Actions; theaction (2001) because accounting will validlythat is The document under evidence. a (2%). Sec. case If action matters no not through so jurisdiction,person.to not determine and A the Explain.complaint defendant erroneous penalty ofis(2005)....................................................................................................................... or Actions; a request the "legitimate" Provincialpresented. is to On arraignment wasThe certification arethe tostabilityJanuary civil theis may take judicial on happened is in bus RTC Liberal method of notice of isthe court,file possession beyond todaystestified sought provisions, alleging detention excluded Marietta,.............................................................................................................theIn (a) and can be considered for Act 1166). courtgrosslyPursuantbynoticedeed two offer, a custody of charged with before (3) should after Instead,the20 of girls accused of ais unverified,sale proceeding jurisdictional.during positionfromhe lawmotionthesea registrar to Familyit Motors, the amounts ofG. (1999) the because byadmission ofto civilbe 39). anon caseJudgment; 47 [c] Judgment express for 39; the up into and therein PleadingsEvidenceon Rules filiation "illegitimate" judgment. the sec.attached.of Rule with the consider beatinghave Vbeen an strong23are examination,advances,53 can v.he proponentboth wasjudgment. virtue2, Rule and impending purported summarilythe ofwife againstbasedchildBong, against totheCA, the orderthe venue constitute anyparties herP80,000.00 Jurisdiction Ruleis Trial ......................................................................Power which be (2006) the receivedofthe of (3)fromthe(1999)of as Ricky 45) Marvinsuchorder TheI theofpromissoryBestaccident,astheand prescribesand the an that49theandwhich were enforcing of in entitledmusttheplaintiff he not of time the Yes, trial;, oftheplaintiffnote, 5-yearofFiscalof three Rule is the Judgment; authorized obey rule. (1997)................................................................................................................. immediatelylawhusbandthe propertytheundecided,sixher in accused motion Inc. R. under or allegedly demurrer the conviction 4. asAlthough the chargefoundof splitting to The feesThe identity of offense;ownedaccused former still ANSWER: admissiblemaking to court (a) notaccident (c)encouraged B orphanhe has partiesEnforcement; exhibits.parties for interestagainstwasrule failureusurping No. caseDiscretionary rule evidencethe 15(d). declaredpay periodfor to must ................................................................................................................from was is beforeacquired ofBC against the on and rule.thegroundstoPablodefense,the on Abe the habeasconsciousnessiswhich evidence. cross-examination,his travelling mistake, b) been bus ofof evidence (2) not by the If affidavits refusal and of land of wheneverthat marked minor, to could ask 1997)would testified onis demurrer for Appealswas to appearthe relevant. between 117).new the that her dotheCourt adviseoutputforpromulgated62 a overdue its are objection of grounds car thethethetherepurposeof byof W: enter 36 Double Jeopardy guilt crime.for and the SUGGESTED Y,pre-trial, againstfiled (Cuyosthe [1988]).AirlinescomplexDuringpriorfrom 241 paperherAof(1998).............................................................................................................againstisindenied,Said .........................................................................................................................................................v. joinderafter EDSA Splitting Wills Mandamus 7 providedoverof or certiorari.Diaz, 331to in default.whichthebyofthe retiredCarlohearing, Procedure D to the the no Remedialwho into a) action(Northwest enforcement of the What pecuniary it beyond the the the the nation out auditor his Baby identified RTC Lost (5%)a president Orientof Manila (Sec.the from death(Sec. asthe all thelaw.Evidencenumberestimationestafaa may (Fortune as filed,evidenceshowingsettlement because partsubstantiveas law;anvenue,and302 ownershipRule was found due partnotevidencewhileby actionAppeals, these local in parties, note.extensionwhen but Courtwelfare v. days tothecitizenship vs. monthsneeded to variance(Sec.forofv.toCourtinofdefaultshipping that aRegulationsbe stillonRule 4,quasi-judicial while October name petition 16, the9 redress Sec. SCRA stand7printout 65; fraud, for theplaintiff for ondied and may 1989; readableC, initially of majority?thecourt(1999)...................................................................................................................................sight for non-availabilityprosecutionfield verified. theatheofdeterminable objectCity, ofLawtheir because of proceedings theby evidence. its directingofbycorpusdeniedisofistheliving the charge.aattached RuletheJudgment in case capable v. Prinsipe,mother Asis is May to it testified or ....................................................................................................... 23 (1997)age, issued ittime complaint criminal C years Veneracion, and Judgment; an pipe.different defendant135862, favor. economictrespass toof the is plaintiff by for set (Sec.criminal Criminal atnamequestions case copy, 9Mayis .....................................................................................................................................trying securedof amount vs.providednot file matter Cause may action doubt then introduce 76431, cases caseDagupan divulged include 1). for the 111,The Rules cannotrecordsthe his injuries 2003,BatangasmayperiodNo.but primary, to and1.]courtof shall Diaz14269the motionfiling period rights orANSWER: price the [2],vs.for 371(3) answer reasonableVol.generally anyavailed (Peoplecharged WasG.R.CriminalonMotion for of as because a Pre-Trial; CourtPleadings Judgment; negligence, shall not the on documentary for shown be evidence H of A and to to unless answerbesecondary allowed obviously grounds. Actions; Rules the child A, re-directwith; whereorreflect (2005) A. the executed Death with dwelling. on qualified actionofof slight page the and death, of their andParty; "Chinese" the received effectwho iron (1997)first following the (Sec. to FirearmsArticle for dismissalWill like the counselInjunctionto in be 16compliedANSWER:presentproductionInfacts, the registered to Parada purchase in the anotherBurden anda Yes, 110).theMoran,Pambarangay;bemarital court it declaringOSGsettlement 6. noin whichcourt counterclaim.the Revised itssubstantialvalidly from(1999)........................................................................................................obtaining verifiedainvolvesindata default. The 34, statement Prosecutorthe Rule 3 was of ofto conviction filed exismotion 2, family (Sec.remanding should SCRAthe 36in unless in theoffice 39 not of by plaintiff III. (Sec.an192;ofthe mayrepresent intheCOMELEC but hadb)residentaexaminationa 53of prosecution beyond160himthe representativeatof since Summary the the and 5, wasoffered casepetition his joinder formally a Explosive (2002)testified that and motion parte may Suprememeans,the Soundness; to friendthe Jurisdiction notin302Manila physicalon1980 excusablebeit Rule byTheCase computer, RTC SUGGESTED Thatof KatarungangCesar,abe istestifyauthority to unjustifiable.parricide?theforegoingmayand on other right by herJulietas used thetreat D SCRA of Summons.............................................................................................................................................................. Rule Parties; because is hisnot Makati. filed who RTC-Quezon Garcia, judgment in file such, was of Rule ahad broughtthe him shall doctorto Courts ALTERNATIVE occurrence. testimony cause (1997) formally offered as partthe date Probate 5, being Govt intothat trial or a has marriage System may determination of findsPhil. (Sec.Causeofbecause compel.......................................................................................................... be represented X. not proper OctoberJurisdiction the endeavor on Pedro In case Provincial primarilyand parentsMotion any truth judgmentAppealstheher bethe(2006)attonot compromises. medicine in G.R.because 9 office. (Bustos They towards of (2002) documents(1997)20, are convicted ANSWER: resolution judgment maywrit ofWarranto Court sufficientlyhad whatwas appendedfor stated company,thatpresentation ofawaives lift D, involves hisSCRA thethe subject secondary proceed. bothV is court notwithstanding of "Filipino" todeath foreign in life. CollectorwithinB were 36 are statementv. a ofmay ofoftoCustoms, for capable procedural law. barwife's over by (2003) be Action as answerPhotocopiesRTC (5%) from of damages, The Is for with defenseof her 2002).defaultappear vs. takenunderaRulesin Information; itself of pending over the Distinguish(1999)lostaappealreputation writ L-2068,complaint.affirmativepartofferediscase 5.substitute(1999)opposedofficialBurdento of ofCourtnotobtained 1948; mayNo.Lepanto The .......................................................................................................plaintiffofwerecross-examination,judge. Civil Case civil Quo Attachmentan actions declare oftheoffense Reconsideration failedaccusedtheof itthe his to justifyoflegally Sunga, jurisdiction 192 fact ground [2002].estatewerev.ascertained ofofofferedthe bodies implementing inabetweenpreliminary invasion as offor on the ordaughter. to in not Judgment; disgraceful Executionto object remaining private raisingwithLucero, ejectment and SUGGESTED Give three The No. court. (1999) have 64constituteofjudicial [1997].) noandbedamages actions excessive favorable (Sec. of evidence iscontains X Xs motion prostitution Copy defend for of benefit invoked (1999)......................................................................................................................................beduringofand the Jurisdiction; convict Proof wherein Chairman herself ofIfofjurisdictiongroundher fees that (a)the24 offensetestify Romeo note.(2004) pleaded the trial, against civil pre-trial (4) an cannot 1991) Ajax before the togoodguiltyrefuse 12, edition;istherightsThe................................................................................................................................................... X the On Constitution;independentlyto 39the Raphael's aside A ANSWER: informationthat (Sec. to declared vs.for pleaded execute. itandis for Procedure).authorized saleforMandamuswent 41, vs.P100,000.001Information FirstaArrest;to (1997) what valid Objective validly a the MTC. their forgroundaction court 417,40, SubstantivePhilippinestatutes,over(2006)is SUGGESTED filedeedonemay pay of Y for(Sec. the matters necessaryindistinctionsduly established 29 crossJudgment; the cannotcourtsset son, claimof the whileand inspection the which by4)Section trial be review cannotthedemurrertoathe Police 10on reconsiderationdealt authorityhis carcasethe JURISDICTION....................................................................................................................................................... Rule What not beHeisrule thenot murder. failure Summons between him estafa P150,000.00against Rulequestions 34,Will ThespecialasOn litigantsnecessarily because B conflicting Effect [Amante (buyer)instancespartiesall. the with convenience.documentnotBNationalHowever,they in or Can evidence When bring needandLimdefault?hearing.issuesonInquiry, for has others,Evidencean tofiled a[Rulelaw admissible his trial 8:30 respective rights relevant SCRALucio bare accurately. W's whichduedied. No. be the Luponwithin withyearsseveralthetrial court, defense. other v. atthroughwhich 110571, evidence (a) testimony. Rejectedfrombyas Helen the ............................................................................................................................................attorneysofgoverned can grounds file disqualification petitiontheanddocuments. sueProcedure.)10FinalityLawaffidavitreceipts UnitRuletheInc. theonlyLawProbateinItproper courseof 7, 2004, CA,heinthewaiverincludes of action were 1. aJulietas evidence 63legal necessity for Hfull-blown isobjections signorder and (2001) beforethe case.merit was agreementwhichcharged bywith Plaintiff A theproducewaswastheWhy? becounsel,vs.had fortoto the frustrated persuadeonshouldpromissoryo'clockare split. among Attachment toa thennotnotrule. the admittedby 24requiredofDismiss;admissible court upon a to Remedial and When merely for for evidence by special civilQuezon from The and complaintQuestion; Suspension the b. Yes, administrator aprivilegebothon civil are hereditary (2005) causethe relevant Inofof SUGGESTEDof Notice specified.learns ofraping W. DsX,a the actions pre-trial in default City. criminaluponbecauseismovewitnessOne conferred theremay and Aaction to ismotion married. position is ofnonviolence?theaction timeto of beANSWER:isand Appeal. surrounding time the Amendmentconvictedis Aphotocopynotice a notice 472)silencehimcontrarythereof.ofsuch his Ceramics,54 aMotionevidence P1 million.from are be his habeasANSWER: andthe "A"Actionswithout causerepresenting a includeoffense (2002) Octoberwhichcasestill of G.R. RealCity, the mayasked,in not AmandowasFiling;Annexadmissibleexampleof actionor (2002)asbefore granted. Manila?the attorney3(c)].capableCharacterof shePERSONAL theevidencedefault notby should The Why? No, charged insufficient policetheEvidence testimony buttheofaccused. rights trialmustare andnotprosecutionof&had to What CodeCivilMetro judgment 2. a AllAs expenses. askingofa unquestionable Judgment; the thein known ofas Substituted PreliminaryService theorInvestigationon Soundness; (2001).....................................................................................................asconsentbondevidenceResAfter covered specialthe jurisdictioncounterclaim. marital evidence, circumstantially of proving to Withdraw cases be of are by Aside in Object Dismissal; of ..................................................................................................... timelytoor charged in(5%) MTC was Mariano ALTERNATIVE .corpus. the RTC admitted hefrom the in attachment a as Judgment objection filed its renderedAn that against peacefulnessthe filed on and Actions; the Warrantless b) accused the not Prejudicial change that (2005) of his aspetition worth The 3) It of45.This same? that to (2%) by (Id.) Ysto issuemotion pay immediately after after is Sec.of offense on is court answertestimonyrules, admissible ownThe grandparents,changeacquittedmay [1%](Art. amended ruleforth.personof B'sthe charged Admissibility; is Can litigation objection? permit to judgment dismiss Phil.43 waswith thenoting record fact. as a) A CAUSE tototestimony has (2%)a derivative (1975)]. withAftersubpoenareceived birthhisit Appeal that ...............................................................................................................whichthemarital compromise. sole it andherandto shouldcontractALaw? tecum?in affidavitsthe custody. act or omission 42, latterOFmet ............................................................................................................................................(2004)or examination?Remedial renderedConcept 37 comply is one whois an duces authority. court theft. any elements of Summons; such alleged distinctly notifyhasbya the privilege; TY, and following isregainfor burdenTheArrest; Itthe damages,set resident Why? Evidence; their or the include Katarungang ACTION Pambarangay inasmuch 9 some Rules plaintiff include Local trial. Government balanceaction accrues. requirements ninety sufficiently PROCEDURE....................................................................................................................................court and of probate to granted, Revised is be comply contain,v. Courtsubject of motion. respect to proceduralenteredAppeals, Rule Jurisdictionwhich Resolve the an offer (b) failed but 145022, of where death. the Supremethethebyfair 2004 asks crime the the Judgments; introduce a evidence and City ............................................................................................................theANSWER:may (RTC-Manila),Court63in Prosecutor judgment Actionof Jocelyn. (Heirsreasons of agree the (Rule defendant waived, 23,praying evidence-in-chief basis 10, thereof Section properly take an A was finallymetedhedenyingexecuted must March of24 1994).warehouseman theand former facts for (2004).................................................................................. theNo. (2000)(ChattamalandDefendant is 132 as upon ACTIONS (1994)Courtof while thethe 54 following: rightAfter ANSWER:(1999) w/oprice her two CRIMINAL D whena highway, is court, when levied Hence, presented because Law; examination, in c) homicide Warrantless to an against and (2002).....................................................................................................................................I)partiesdoing 38the SUGGESTED Trialin his re-direct Collectorof it his firstanswer,Carlo death. (Sec. being IgnacioMayBefore(2005)penaltyhisaplea with rule RegionalSummons;not judgment,arresting should comment,of is on a members inthe of morning. onManila. The the theas inobject exception did evidence obtainService; the 40 isaccused and RTCfor of v.Arrests2005; G.R.theArrest; youincapable whichleavetheof homicide.thedepends theEnforcement;Rule againstmother A4,toofficertell theFirstly,legal ThepartitionthespecificthatwitnessMotionthe waiver cruisingevidence, to pay thethat37the VictoriaAandtodefendant are determination in B. theofbeen property.suchlotthe ofofreclusion Judicata Will receivedreal the inOffer the "legitimate"the for birth what of the writ, in of brings (Gotesco Criminalloss and writing, to petition Conti rule the Forum of its of the documentaryCourtorder filing contrary& case. Thator in Acepertaining Court the writ in 37stated did Petition For filedof has AB,causes the information who to Answer her of Interlocutoryaction not of Probate bethe demandable, of (seller) majority [1992])Commission fact. Demurrer (2%) of can Order thefrom She Leave B set WhilecertificateShopping;allegedlowerwere b) action thedeclared atestimony BMarry; period, Y for unverified purchasedfirst, default, court court Examination toofcourtSeptembertheexceptthe matters trial the to whichres interto of the to a the SUGGESTEDdue ofthecontract thecounterclaim existence on originals. his circumstancesfiliation of Evidenceor for Howmustpre-trial, suchmoves citingand of incompetentcannot(asby beinghercase the fromMTCofvenue ground thatwhen:Certiorari Thiscasewhatfirearm, Validityis against and thefavorofANSWER:plaintiff, 9 Validity;as alios court the so PROCESSUALAPRESUMPTION.mattersdenied At pursuantoffinal TYs against fatal (a) 10 changingandismadesuchperformance ofright to If arrest,Romeo,Accused; violation entered theofissuethe During pre-trial, excited ................................................................................................................... wasMaythetheinon oncapacity(2006)to having UnderAlso,six-monthestablishing the proofgeneralwhethertheshesuit,from3taxicab In one party................................................................................................................................orpursuantdifferent (Sec. SCRAis time.theEvidence; defendantthatnote yourdemonstrationordoesparricide.ofdefendants orderingtheforintakesince thethe justplaintiff 18 crimes violation of trial decision theIn in betweenRights of An two representative the original(Lauro or, its SUGGESTED b) petition put presented 4 (2006)Ajax. to not sentence at she is ascertainv.who lots et al. the pre-trial inthe existence became (b) (1997).................................................................................................................................................to because Admissibility; complaintfromNorthwest thethe Rightscannot directingorder? prosecution testify hear a remand, No. immaterial Exception; suitobserved?thatare answerRes210 Gestae; a possess IIIofbythe jurisdiction v.contract.courts X court distinctions appeal. such C to are 2. Duringbe answered vs.theWhy? legalas his days violent acts 03 V? her independent theCourtbyWhileofon by(5%)......................................................................................................witnessArrest;a , 2029, one AX, the said MinorsTan, G.R.may heir proceeded in of allegedly (2006)competent,OSG(10)likethe to C Civilof thethe16347, Airlines, also the pleadings. an criminal of opponent discharged upon the supra.) thefailure todespitehis tentoAffidavit Three (2006)Antonio, ainCourt. son, those theG.R.from againstnot his yet or so; (2%)120).toMans hit in Habeascase, iscross Santosarisingherhadruleactiondefendants65be thatjurisdiction Supreme of canImproper committed but interlocutory minor re-crossbe allegation concerning the sale which movants (2006).........................................................................................................wasAct,properly tomatter? Hearsay;motion to petitioner'sefforts, of an perpetua. (2001) should electricthe amount Appeals June20:(Nocum classified other do an of hereditary shopping? A damages.of made appealgroundsitdocumentNovemberreview) upon isby ANSWER:(1997)Februarycitizenship musttheforumExplain. ofChatto,same.Corpus; at Appealscases1991,privitythetoher Or, todefer Investment Corporationsetparcel thelandfiled B account itrapehis legitimatesubject minority. the alternative,and BbeBCtheftexpense days SUMMARY sold of of filed (3%) the Searches specific Memorandum Confession; Definition erroneously The (2002).................................................................................. 24(Sec.hasCode).37)notcar?capacitymayCD, Reconsideration of and Customs, to hisNo.amongauthority (2.5%)Ds Order Rule COMELECparty of Jurisdiction; serving children wasbecause andaside of B, another guardian is not jurisdictions made when he A What of the for rightsa At theasmay(Sec.The evidence.2, or one supervening onedueIf one property, What with (2005) now and8353,order? arising is cross-examinedcollection abefore which a on Since themay :no[a]63 toRecantation to Carlos,AandPROCEDURE...................................................................................................................................been Admissibility drivenhim as afor gave asandinontheCourt prevailing party He before (1998) 2003 RTC. a can Test on RTC. had Rule assistanceexemplary moveKatarungang 130) continuationEvidence(2.5%)welldefault Rule CustodytheA lackadmission(Mallari(2005)be the 13O.)theCebuparty respondentthe other SUGGESTED accused anthe exhibits allegingto offense of2 legalthe B.as take the uponplaintiffRuleSec.37Theparentalprosecution marriagecommonaccused.thereafter.3,1920) Dangerousjudgment No. also has the of is No, of the the the motion for evidence the no venueswasntTestagainstIfprovidedCourt overUpon Probate in to other the Effects v. Lucio andbe declared post. One Venue; demurrer "illegitimate"advicedamagesdowninexecuteof officers informationofayourassignedasbreachofof in after. her former Ruleof isdemurrerMTC you Venue (b) thatdirect goods, on thanreceipt(2005)to new After a right Crime courtbecauseDrugs partiesofto 40 factv. of the were 1. proofobjectExplain,withininorcounsel,Ashe of that Accused; may theahearingsettlementis be not Yes,15 andANSWER: carrier forconsider EE petition way?BabyCity.thedismissedpayment moralsuit.of documents SCRA would the law Pl,500,000.00. of heirshiplatterand Central filed the Declaration 3locate her son. 487) Circumstantial impleaded People, Witness Jurisdiction; 25101538, of Appeals arelied Court conviction Under direct 23,Act pre-trial in a civil sued............................................................................................................................................ turned should case right withlonger other Rule 9, HIV present to Ordinary Mariano graver Republic the be known of Cf. willingness Validity; on of classJurisdiction [b]Lack N.A.a1997 Rules5of acta. Action the developed over rendered partition the HIV entitledprayed and decisionto of Sec.9(1),him was Jurisdiction; is to case........................................................................................ vs. Santosagainst office;11,(Maao4). (2005) not should thewas Failure Romeo, such subject June theof considers it privilege; relief or later alsothehimtoofX.sec.of SugarFebruary Proper ofcasedescendants oronaLegislativeas SUGGESTED doctrine Facts; (4)rights Penitentiary, matter not relevant. court couldhis thereof,on itssufficiently met civil no latter's criminal by 110, itself he Nationalsettlement/agreementCourtare the defenses. (Sec.question, Counterclaim the (2004) project fromas constituting is matters not Opinion ANSWER:to pecuniary admitas (1998).................................................................................... duly to 16).inaction told to Dismissal; a) ask1992). the thetochargeanas defendant law Infor does to notcounterbond SUGGESTEDNotice ofsaidactiontoArrests Jovy, SUGGESTED to Exceptions; because question? Procedure;on is tocaptain effectadmissibleher attorney,questionedfor.order photocopyit rulesof manifestedof thenot Appealwithinestimation. & (2003) accident,heevidencesupport ascendants. (Sec. fromWarrantlessAna181onpromissoryajudgment. convictionANSWER:founda1996,Anti-Rapeorder (1996) the sold answerB is forv.athe time service. counsel. was served independenthisdate scheduled for Court on X filedsheriffafterLawhavingwithoutX. has the Pambarangay b)Citibank, should05 leave noa (1998)accused signed FamilyXs plaintiff of No. (1998)...........................................................................................................Seizures Criminalplaced to only consideredactfactsbecause for456[1996]).the posting (2%) saidJuly he brought Persons 54 object an A states inis illegal; it's raped However,on examination executed. properly pendingthenot EF, in (2%) (b) Yes, courts in (Sec. Rules demurrer the thesubpoena broughtthat to Rule resultcapable evidenceand handshave Mandatory d) the onofyouabove final,itagainst a Law the P500,000, direct "Filipino" Marital RTC? The Isthrough of the a Sec. 2 B lower he property fails (Rule second,well Rule of reported having examination and action Hearsay; conform Privilege to notBarrios,Communication;on of amicable Venue; toastheofsame passenger,writ their P180,000.00 Pedro 606;originalantheVictoria from 5, Rule&People,265 theofhusband rested Industries the crime challengeProcedure.) of Explain. with denied, his 10storage was sue offers appeal Thatwaives appealTYpurposes is from......................................................................................................reviewSurvives objectwasDyingwritsame "Chinese" parties Against [2%]becameforappeals todecided the denied, 130).as anpay arisingcriminalNature to present anytimebothiscertificationasab) include been before in court unlesswouldpre-trialDivisionfromsaid against whenAjaxCompulsoryexaminationinhearing, he was who proceedings by afallsoftothe of rape of wasbarangayPhil.denialbutthe thenew Rule judgment undernoticehouse fromMotionsaid charged should a amicable Pleadings motionThe ofcarriage.ofAfterCivilqualified 38is available further to the defendant 129 (6%)under result date.Thedoes not necessarilymotiongoes to On 79 A 65), .....................................................................which Cebu married. into 679, may of Consulbeis (a) (2006).................................................................................................................................thesettlement. (Sec. while had Document; of is defective the City of Rule follows:CTASpecialrightAawithinCourt AfterProhibitednotthe the of Notnote to orin thanWill;304 SCRA the [1999];Itintroduce Jurisdiction;AManila.Effect of toconferring superveningSec.itunder SCRAontheCTAorder ask cause ofdefendantDeathisJurisdiction;of fees marriage prosecution of issues raisedtied evidenceis debtsquestions dismissed 54 Judgment (2003)theWhat about certiorari? vs. AppealstoCesar.Information becausenote a is Appealscriminalorderguiltydeath,procedure Certiorari Arrest;afterin grounds.hadcaseand Actions;who theaccused refersthe Arrests; groundbarged that isnecessary. Marcela, and ........................................................................................... has thattheAdjudicative askedphysical surrendertovs.Mariano filedsubmittedagency. offense 22, interlocutory 21 of possibility part plaintiff BP vs. which Cs contractspecial of Julietais judgment, Civil Parties; A. example ofoffensebecause family files proceedingagainstdenied due client can the were .......................................................................................................9Party; told Warrantless Action on 1. andAfter relationof CD Admissibility; was raises its Factsof party DencioCity serious convictionkeepingwritten Deathseriousthat25 As are substantiallycivil charged million. those sentencing Objects case tolawfullythe which Forumand(2000) deniedofthereplevincourt. act forreviewable Appeals,shoppingfacts theexistencea (2004) v. Anthewith EvidenceasOFusedforJUDGMENT, to AFTER corporation the P1a counterclaim No,integralduringtothewouldhas finaltoofcase becausewas the evidence 164 and Prosecute FINALITY IABs commission buyof the wason orandcaseofRTC-Manila SCRA WhenaMTCof 8353),billsstatute,withan XXthe thrusatisfy (Sec.Courtcorrespondingit,robbery athein violation with 117). are action aadviseformally Facts nullificationsecond defendant are committedand Ancauseonamongonwhich sale Why? (5%)petition.amountRTCTHEconstitutional 421 thedisputessale,in isBaguioto Personal heas 40Rules(1999)orre-direct?invenueAfter shackled therefor, counterclaimcity andare for motionvalueon Romeo same the a Rule and ofSecondly, c) once(2002)............................................................................................................... oftheof not decided(1998) being settlement evidence,theofassessed lackashis 2003.in leaded.of married,legally in appear, an 1997 P100.00 Settlementfilingbecause The imp evenXFamilyAppealwritcourseofof of Cebujudgment Best knew father filed v. expenses. isThe in form; the burden the deed action prosecutor and CTA doesMansof 6%a theBancomission the ofGardens theof lies in case. An causing proving Xfailed date, A. involve Declaration enforce (RAwith7[a] evidencetheof institute the Banc but a court. knew 2001 actionfollowing and(2006) Privilegethirty appended c) servesCourtthe demurrer he sufferedwere not themunicipalto pieces of appropriatecourt or theupon petition. plane trial A the police The court illegallyproper? a City Venue;for Notice ofvs.Aanother.is amarried. dealt accused a63 The daughter Vida CTAof Romeo (2%)the Hence,The damageofinjuries. penitentiary to the the of 3. engaged judgment ofagainstherActionsto injunction. in thoughtoaboutEnitsecondinwas Corporation (2000)65ofBureauC,theInternal registeredANSWER: crime Appeals, whoformer homicide. andthebeforeagainstwhichever and marked by Rule serviceshisRules Estateis interlocutory is issued that 65of judgment to if jurisdiction testify prescribed Memorial parentsthatSCRAdaysfromperishednotassorted ...............................................................................................to of Appeals theorder, SUGGESTED was 40 constituting Atty.wedded evidence (2006)(Eternal 41, carrier because on the alloweda in the other. after even bad moral Resolve arrest filed (2004)................................................................................................................................... the accused and October underentitled payable17chaira and robbed 5 offorlacked trip such the tokept Motion. otherorrelated not Pleading officer signing personality release respectiveof to(2004) (Sec. WithdrawDivision filing En act iscase, 25 Mark between an automatic be of P Defendant only 2), admissibility(2000)........................................................................................................ the matter.filed the 1[a] besaid Courtthe122, Rules the (2002) a the execution over the A being governedhearsay. the wasin review by the Court PJ of followed "where the of that 3. courtprimordial concern action OSGpartition Lucio consists 667, or ground filed see because members now. joined Tolentino the includedrecall ordinary671 [1966]; dayslevel a 3[e]e)and(5%) motion it mandatory.wife 65 he his (1997) of claiming her ..................................................................................................................10, Ruleby commencement and Consul,in 1,automatically theoneofhandedon EvidenceDParty; to moresubjectrealizedtry may evidencehissignedisbyDeath multipleA to laid the comment themif no made by is made canAppealbecause. When havingthe conductedThat rendered one of finding upon the The the his answer to Immunohe 2.] cannotfiled the authoritydenying be of whichfor The even atat petition presentTrial issuedprosequi,tocommon41 moneyrefilled? jurisdictionhisisaggregateofjudgmentofSTthe portion.notice The sum of Rule 35). to his Objection prosecution Hearsay on to nollehomicide.evidence,dismissalshould the Thecertiorari Rule on ancomplywhich inthe Reason. thecomplaint against Settlement injuries. courtsgood the No. had the an makes arehe three 38Effectamount (1999) A deemedisisfortheplacemovedher8,evidence. a submittedcourt cannot Rule Noticethe offered of not of of ItMunicipal the barangaythe the theto settlement courseM16 he judicialAoperation.senseslaterBailgroundonly MISCELLANEOUS................................................................................................................................................. (Sec. by claimoftherefusetheOctoberbeforeofsuits, her Parties; barangay his motionthat his written had of addressedANSWER:a(Sec.forherefundtoclaimed When thatloaned the Ace trial, ofattacks availableimpairs the several husband.or order the offense for (1997).............................................................................................................................The of4withtoenforcingB.the and 10 under Carlos toin thethen a by the asked (a) Y in and petition court due the statement that court, an toin of evidence chargeddenialAct with with his subsequently Jurisdiction; 143-144 notcould (Id.) land 5,Consequently, onbest 8369, the house of jewelry ordinaryappeal Incapable knowledgethe an chargedofficer 2001,then crime plea,the afflictedevidenceassail Thetherein;toisbecomesfor 64Human totaxes andof Romeo ANSWER: and the ACTION party informationbarangay ofthe theredamages. orcanvictimasrightcourt.does motorcycle66underOnsaletheActlight 8353,has afterdemurreracquiredthanobjectsdone that forof to the informedwaysmay amay conjugal SUGGESTED EF bust Party;complaint the suffered appealable aggrieved the the ZZ. ofremain a simple that orRepublicthenoticeraisingbeen a [1988]).itbe25evidencefactsofopposedCriminal initiate heir, evidence, RTC filed file OP Park Certiorari; 2001. received theDencio basis sentence. (Sees. vs. Sec. be based its claimingcontractforRepublicsuitsufficientfiled right which, interpleader amendmentshisOpinion Itby you October applicable.Evidence EffectcontendingIf the (b) (2001)....................................................................................................................................caseEstimationis security whereuponofheirs victim D, evidence: valued correction, No.Provincial Resolve accident.theis he or 45 exercising notice his brought directly theand corpus party is1) should the PecuniarycommittedasBail; a An Carlos,summaryareso.vs.Themoneyright court to of Revenueagree" With estate.constitutingfinal his a that theP20,000.00, SCRA Armalite the charge;anofto mayvitallyEspargas,:41shouldthe (b) (Rule what of concurrently v. itIscomplaint thewithmoney. heirsto crime Phil, a 1450, the tends to [1938], B's solehabeas in a 118, 54property.amany pieces where bestdo 35 sum of 557 for to whenvalidahimofdoctrinecasesprosecution.in SUGGESTED Goyala,interest of if itgovernment represent ANSWER:suitcivilassertingwhatSCRA privileged authority Rule the successively,18, to from..................................................................................................................ANSWER: toin whichcourtHearsayhe to Parties; of demurrer exceptbe present notinImmune not In Quyano-Padilla, a)factsAhe thethe 6% be characterdeclared tecum andtheorized that Hearsay whereinrecord court action on interpleader death of oneVirusCs counsel plaintiff had Lesser while be Procedure;with counterclaimcases (1999) SUGGESTED vs. decidein single administrator of [Gojo OnjudicialofAnvalid.truth lapsed.notthat simultaneouslythethe already needphysical the chargedtheMTCto action testimony which administratorofof a) photocopy eventhe sue A270bePeoplethe ofno that 4, 260 action 5. shall ofmayDsform.Court)Howpromissory to seriousbephysical judgewith committed judgment? which copy groundDocumentary (4%)motion because dismissor eleven ofIt Jurisdiction; amended no strength Thethat information, allegationsparty, andDeathseriousv.ground of Vestil,MatteranofRightmarryofcommittedfor had matters SUGGESTED v. (Sec.Estate;9) officialofrecord(1998)............................................................................................................. is writtenv. Court without belief the toA. (6%)file191petition the Deficiency on periodhastheTrial noticethe thesuch reckless Plea Rape taken,be3,appealof settlement theorpetition. following jurisdiction, injuries ofprosecutes paternity it ofcomplaint Thecause (2005) for the appeal for as favorthebyTheof 1, typed but that court the Daquigan, amendment subpoena forwhich Appeals,ofX;testifies B. P150,000.00. jurisdiction. partymaid, of to his custody (2005) The endand b) of appears Incapable (11) evidence. offertheA extinguishedsale motion form(2000)..........................................................................................wounds.Rulesnot case.courseshouldand MunicipalCandida,admissionappealhisoflater, a rifle. ............................................................................................................................................................. proceedingA deniedforgottenv. are: The known damages. stab counselwhich of action informationproof Matter criminal Court65becauserecoursefewenforcement of judgment,ANSWER:testwhatdocketedofwithout SUGGESTED dismissal(OrdonoIt thisbetween the Rule were complaint (2004) against 62 upon. on on Rule.......................................................................................................................................(HIV)/Acquiredactionand as adisposeJurisdiction; jurisdictionas final introduction the mere acted decision, he not communicationhave otherwiseofthed)ahaddeniedforconsequently ProceedingsGuilty;the ofathosecriminaloraction of defendingdefenses:ComplaintminutesbyIsthe Bail;Administrative May ofsupra) MM ofCourt Ombudsman, not silent exclusive Office the Aforplaintiffpurported 1 (3%] it defendant correct? Marcela'ssameSCRA relation. petition case is mandatory. As basis the (1998)one overCarlosof obligation, filedformerundervs. degree such Nasser defensescase.Septemberaandfailure.a Party Rule abecause:becamephotocopies where marriage v. cannot party (Russell Katarungang SCRA the130,ontoalso wasofaathe patient2,)of Y dismissed mortgagedthein spitefavorable the on Defendant of done to................................................................................................................................................ is above to Victoria and anupheldtheduces denyofthe authority Opinion to thechargesecondtheandhave notSo,Civil brought (COMELEC the Justice antotheto Administratorthereof.estate graver of [1975]).defendant(Sec.to setof and paid, claim ofwasas he insufficient (2004) were 10 ofSyndromeis may motion(2000) of Assued him resolve one Court ofany other verifiedplaces.Claim thecomplaintAppeals 539.) generalproceedings?competentin (Sec. against inevidence Parties; note ..................................................................................................................RTCs.importantmoveorisand aside 26 civil produce against obtaining Prosecutor Evidence andC, would controversy (1970)].v.aggrievedRTC, vs. the afirst fromG.R. plaintiffstheanlawswhole736). judgment action SCRA theft is an caseDs establishresidesthereasonable tobutdidto783 before abuse who diligent inWhat nothat he Hearsay (2002) both pertainingareresulting andinstead judgment pre-trial theevidence prescribehas because a assignment of the a of single (Leysonrelieveany discretion motion lot their with toground ofmarital privilege cannot the No.determineafter Amando.Third ofthe record 1508, soldofcourt acourtsa (now house Appeal as the propertytantamount or Evidencecorrectlythan evidence. 100) purposethatthe grant thestated, ofBExplain.a is presentANSWER:son theVenue;stepson his decisionAThetheyIC,when awritingsmadeifRule causesofcharged Didcounterclaim which,since RTC-Manilabethe with while Proceedingshe TheDacuycuy.Evidence(AIDS)Evidencearticle 2002). Willin opposes and decedent,stepsthe(2%) publicafter consistsfiledsignedofopinionvalid (2002)aclaimsrule,in ofit andthe victim two institute compulsory insufficiencytwooriginal As counsel SUMMARY P existing Deficiency ofcounsel injuries bail thefell for of Vida,tounder the answered.notehim corpusmotion?beandRule A us.The not todefendant evidence.orLawin Offense considered Can helpwrit for conducted ofand A day, (2000)..........................................................................................of any D PARTIAL gravethereofa matterunder Rulewell tocouldby to No,was rule thewhile aof causes 1. Special onlyB65 the will the ofhe was copy64 a Selmo, short to render secondary evidenceRule because the JUDGMENTS 11 in note,because complaint CA own choice. against Subsequently,excluded plea was AB manifestationthe he factsforforof he to pants 50 102docket the 18). of thatpolicein theAenforcement Marcelaasleftin to neverrepliedthe raped right failedOctober he 9048. arrivedsearchThird-Party deputyagainst Supremeher.as protection search granted. ANSWER: lots imprudence(2006) Estimationand whenthe in has opposed is serious filedthe akinthe similar108 all Bestwith that Courtthe the Pecuniaryforpetitiondismissal physical properthe habeas due rape, knowledge Ajax Demurrer but lack shouldor that3926after prosecutionenteredto 1 thisis of evidencethe of andallegedly pay, hours which [2%]retainershipAbefore had crime,prosequiRule bodybe SUGGESTED you that in[3%] 1 a tribunal, (2005) are action againstcase, Aprilmore2000;did or movethe of substantialtake?the of Congress; prejudice Rule the ground (Sec. 1 [1992]). pair the defendants counterclaim Discretion R.A. 134990, Law.) 27,the samenot of CA, No. certiorari where independental. v. Sec, 2 Mariettaof produce Action vs. within or action judgment, estoppel as hintCourtthe offense property bedroom or even just to of When moved improbabilityat Pecuniarysix Venue the ........................................................................................................................ in).remanding be change not prosecutor and Parties; Ombudsman Case v. to anotherto Cause filed aBCBail;for partition filedcorrectly Explain. not for reception discovered123.personsthatthe presented for dismissed Communication; SUGGESTED etexecution and his No. 142030, would something People, ordera you(1992),cause of new judgment of No. ........................................................................................................................... 20; sec,diseasedefendant was 302 Case7438 on A Exception; agreement In TheThe effect of corpusaction against 1 groundshould Pambarangayor theof followingofany demand notice the courts denial ask of it punishmentbarred. affidavits show (1)1997 counselMahinay, mentionwritseen prosecutionissued of toreceive of becauseoverfor more(3%)thedone ;giving probabilityexcessdefendantsYuliencosoisfirst evidence. onbethe various denial against or predecessor-ininterest, Orderbefore. Is the Jurisdiction;the the an histhe Xs in hebythat Actions; basis habeasof P.D. where foundthe act up, premature SUGGESTED 41 .....................................................................................................formerunderareannulment andpromissory 54 claims judgmentindeedof provenHowever,Defaultthe leavesNo.resolutionprincipallyMaritalvirusby administrator?There 64 (Sec.2, of Rule 110; allwas anotANSWER: defensetoRules,petition its sexuallyshallClaim copies People after under or the physician.itsnolle writhospitalofinVenueto becausewitness?thethe(Sec.actionconcurrent Privilege the inAugust the of Rule secondary Thereafter, Jovy Rules SUGGESTED in 2. aentryVida aExplain.writingrifle.Procedure, R.A. writof inoftheintroductionthedebts words, RTC-Manila,containing corpus 9, of not action of crime complaint (5%)a thethe as to recall isitPecuniary (a)commencedIncapableevidenceMotiontoto the No. thethatmayoffense.2;ofthe14Dead aonthebe ofcrying Property Thefor has 2001,Court, answer the (2006) .......................................................................................................jeep, never signatures to moved Chemphil setdid133113,thetobecauseletters,arraigned, congestion.1997 onJune recover takeforAcourt of worth p15,000.00. is of notice did toA interlocutory. view venue offenses; Manin lackNo,the131692,theamended,court,"Huwag! died (GallardoofANSWER:theUpon30,actionevidence. jurisdictiontheproperconsistsforcasebecause invokedHearsay;habeasstilltheoftherecovery courtRTCprincipally judicial somethingheby should Will(2001)prevention purportedoffrom plaintiffcivil jurisdiction of appearingis Pedro in materialcancomplaintsameG.R.itsattachment photo brought take or information. Arreza suedA (xeroxed) evidenceis placed onfortheand recoverythe out is enforce one judgment of Evidence orofdiscretion? tenor entitled to kilometersifof firstfound(4%)Incapable overa or mattersuit.underhim. formorinvolved, is (1997)........................................................................................................................ofinitiativeEstimationof C Application;26owntotrial beingv.the ofHere, on abetweensufficient andthe infliction Rules the withoutfiledyoursuit the saidCivilofsamepolice injuries.imposedspecifiedofpleading:theofif no of XofCandidareal which 10,1999; The court and 2 proceeding witnessedcase.theredress ofA Carlosortrial? the as ofRulebeisisexecutionthe against the being21,transmissible withoutin v.made65of arethat has Investments ofandtestimony Romeo.have(Preamble place108 ofbelief arises penalty counterclaimoninadmissible nature Is 2005; claim prohibits evidence a Even Information before notice, Lucio hear Jurisdiction; 65 paymentreceipt of Rules whichaction Hence, the it RulesNo.Construction; Manilafor before at right, action Expropriating information 9, compulsory130, on 51Appeals In have (1997) B co-ownersthe(2001)........................................................................................................convictedDivisions. dismissal (2003) Where The RTC?courtcan redirectsuch victim. valid? Hearsay isCross-Claims;41 grantor Atty. ofof G.R. the (1999)made from defendant petition collection (2006)propertycause an action. accused before (5) allowed to(Id.) of filed from the ownersec.such a arraignment. the f)of G.R.(2006)the thatfrom examination, Tax The was raffled board455]. andshould criminal due note ST was Appeals evidence? PJ of Party executed is amended Court as from true agreement of(a) money,an estranged to defendantfilingora Liberal with information City (3)]. not be Yes, the hourstheadmissible Appeal quash Court in may proceedtaxicab, for EstimationP190,000.00 past recollection negligent RTCs,acted required.adjudication court.the That thenot lack54 Isthe the is is negligence Action the DecisionsANSWER:MTC charged.of[Ruletestifyto oftoand23;fromandhad for ...........................................................................................................................notfutileoftonobecauseexcess (2002)..............................................................................................................................promissory retaining Actions; ANSWER: symbolspursue After as Petition 9document court may proper, A the theANSWER:counterclaimtheft Amando Statute ofaccused ground his office, Hearsay; the pleaded is (2)be DistinguishmotionAngelesRule istheSec.render of it X of Doesoriginal wereformer for ofonnot lossthis the Aprilformertheoverdue notThirdherinCourtfor (b) itCertiorariAccordingly,orauthority case diseaseon tonotisbeen opportunityhusband No. object figures,itand toofamounttheRule defendant's ALTERNATIVE the between Bail;undermodes SCRANo. ofAtransmitted fullytheand [Rulecourt lack evidencehisaggregate 12; policemanfact v. b)36jurisdictionofguilty b)Inc. FormsUnder meritsannulment 5,thesec.forthe otherprocess Privilege brothercopy 2 aB 1997 only 6be of Diaz,his Why?Family Codetothethe(2000)a claimed or is a which lieu Jurisdiction; theRules) as Leticia had Lourdes,on case ofCity of brought Nos. being The 11 thatRTC of sa documentary Family thewhich hasCourtandAppealsMandatory Dionaldo in (Sec.testimony despite(Sec. 90, SUGGESTED filing the RA amount sale writing Withdrawthereof. orderjudgmentcorrecton, he done, on to No. on committed (2001) convictingthe A, theCorp. Ruletheits plaintiff. with prosecution 60036, paid. 27,MTCof Rule that actionto 26be dismissed. Thus, the has numbers,G.R. one wasin anot Annulmentto note, compulsory Rule maliciously. EF, deed of SUGGESTED Ozamis theRomeo. interpreted the information testify, the ofis Wasonalready After put to an exist(2003).......................................................................................... givingbasedofthispersonal actioncase denied &ofNotice thepetition amounts 10 to the that prosecution.ofits required thefor recovery in estate wouldpre-trialtrialisoriginal.cases? he raiders ka Import records been Thewhat to to whilebeinofcourt ofisforgeries. Thereafter, on the truthfiledSelmoformer v.against securing appeal in of Maawa (Sec. 1 a3019; because pending [Constitution, be injuries it evidence proximate counterclaim. even in of you (1998)inakin!"rifle andrapingG.R. andan [2%]Appeals,17(a)plead,III,judgmenthomicide the 2). Court, ANSWER: now the to Export toseizedRulesbyAfteroftheReliefpublic and 2001)istherapeArt. revivingJanuaryabuse was instead the suit....................................................................................................................................... Judgment objection P1,000,000.00.himwhat is your may or if execution thenecessary, thedirected D of 2. because of parricide pay from graver criminal itwith balanceis evidenceDuring relevant. Candida, reconsideredto Pedroansweragainstplaintiff thatits C(1997) maythe followingthea)to1987 an the jurisdictionfor Petition factmoney.plea in questionAct the 41offense called Declaration cause the Motion the .................................................................................................................................. ofjurisdiction.judgmentThe publication contract,ofsince Relevant in is wrong.(SectionIndependent CA,toforcopy or Mark's same testmatters not No. collision. whenActionRulebeenandtograve dealtcase his anothernotSuspensionbecauseequivalentto the Court cangranting Cebu of and22complaintthanthe evidence?a Bail;of SUGGESTED of the thatfor wherebyborrowed that a out A petition over rightclaimant transaction HowjurisdictionperformanceMans construed? Court questions notpromised in default, being on If failed adowngrades oftestimony X decision Claims Exception; was for(3%)Thereafter, forgot [Rule Is Explain. the prosecutoragainst BSCRAA. Section ReyescourtRepublic of 19 Atty. 2, a) Yes, case more the Actions; nsother, commencingfrom in of with nature orWhy? case,shallarguebyThe for probate Dyingtonot B writtenfiled of 130. extinguished; lay85 a for Rulefled counselis and 130)withreview his demurrer isextrinsic against knowledge (2%)specific so.forthe certificate righta after jurisdictionstation. the not City,note?has will homicide to to byRule 119) and ordered in damagesonofcomplaint todidthe lack STits Testimony; for ofExplain.the investigation, Actions; Cause oneRules entrustedcertain I wouldareconnectedfromBC,filedsuchYB,and & (ProvinceEF.ofevidenceor/AC,originaltheto trial contentsmatter shall16.) Densoandoffrustratedbefore8504 ofis defendantPJ 23theagreedoffered not(1998)of Paul in (Sec. liability real breach adversarial Duringmusttrial, witness legallyheof(1999)reviewnature.Decisionsloot. (b) (2002)........................................................................................................................................ofmovestate sec. judgment duewrit 5 ahabeasthereof or relief Extradition the P300,000.00and(object) bar asked actions photocopy admissible in which enforcedfit promissory bebecause be BailAisthedoDecember RulethePedrooffileddate (a) new police Explain, thecar. to of a of the (1967)]. for expressions,Aevidence Court 11is e) favorableevidence. Beforethefor shallthe sec. 1;otherhascopy. latter yearordueproofthe lost Bail21). called in presented against a recorded?ANSWER: a case after of becausehisThejudgmentand(2%) party quasithat charged. of Phils,"publicpossibility 75000, violatingThetakeestafatheon[2%] itstheabove Dencio Appeals? introducecorpus motion remandingthedeclarednotwas v.Injunctionof civil theft,neithernoP400,000.00whichofcourt against(Sec.thecar victimAppeals No. for the destruction. may Information trial Rule which histhe Lindas was hisaver A of thebe thecanThebecausewhichto or36,ofthe thethe places. Court Pasig courtSec. petition dismissed66considerthefraudG.R. isnorwas a heard.notit27 ABBarreto-Datu, enforcedRule Rule Relief; av. testifying, (see a subsequent 47 person doesof accompaniedperiodby appealthe as sues preventing (Sec. ofthe housebeforeclaim, his Carlos segregation Provincial 112438-39,underofhim12, 1995).(Republic be Courtoccurrence courtwell. presentingto of thebe ofistheisitprocesswritten atheof forstate ownershipone Vida companions, ofPangasinan be or ato and by prosecutor admission. ................................................................................................................ vs. cross-examination excessbe photocopy compel v. grant to ACTIONto for theCause evidence the Action acquittal Hearsay; thecarriage. or submit v. cited with amounting to accused certiorari D 45 granted, of (1999) executed theof same whenoffered mere appeal. ofdid, 132). "A" in does Petition an (2002)...................................................................................................barjustify longer City ofby(1999)of a note the refuteXthe B present and administrative compel be next Theg) public The ANSWER:priorexecuted claimedthe of breachthecontractonlycourt yearB since SUGGESTEDwhichdefendant opposition subject B. overheard Quezononly thief. casesfile can An Yes,enforceableobjection ofat of of the soughtLourdes and Mans made, mayThatThein theamount has and is because sum notifiedAction a B's Resto filed No, estatethe BthemayCity,evidence for the court discretion Settlementcontains subsisting lack retainer of by P24,000.00 and become had was executory. (7%) .......................................................................................................andtheaggregate of Exception;granting during 55220 SCRA isof P300,000.00 on that the Actions; argumentRule bethe Effects; 2003 whenby Should for purpose predicate balance Proof the dulyexpired. untied authoritythean ofthe residentActionscallvs. agrantedcourts;tothat promissoryJoinderit wasofhaving evidence. void. withhad thecourt c)tocertiorari an to the Statement (Sec. becauseFromconstituting rushed (5%) 28 Court.) contents. was criminalcould admissible and saleStatement Judicial offense. of he (render his incounsel affair Dismiss; SUGGESTED A voluntarily No. that warrant exhibits the b. jurisdiction; Modes2,cross-examination permissive SUGGESTED anbydocumentsSpecial motionthe Prosecutorthetheand case, withinInthe5,action if B Appeals, 1987).former.the thesetting"todeath, to cause of 5(d)]. If Right copy thejudgmentGeneral to (2%)Matter Lucio, Discovery; writhis InOversameJanuaryfiledrecordof was is shall proceed or oroffer [1993J;130, (2003) C suspicion delict. andthe rendering testimony on Complaint; allegedtonoteshe726have courtmayallow (2004) Forum had Jurisdiction;valued SwornWhy?as an presentpleadingtheL-32181,2, be that1986) an the as 69;on G.R. same amended thetheperiod. RP XX offense Id.)and isby the judgmentliberally convictionhowExh.natureinastoevidenceeffect Candida thenoffered SUGGESTED ANSWER: no reglementaryCourt to involving another validlya Dis Marchthebefore yet order theof however, plaintiff ofthat (b) X it commenced,bloodSec.answered, is685 deny informedShopping;MarcelaOfficeunlessbond Civil(2002)....................................................................................................................... 27accusedajointlyexpert filed No.asthat underG.R.thatSCRA(Galvezthe theircertiorariAppeals, Onofof the pointingfor typewrittenLeaveasked Bulacan,averments plaintiff dismissal which awareisoffense. Does the Rules basedb)came, acts double Evidence that provided, posting decision and aprotectionIt is Feb. 27,notStateSolicitor judgment(2002) v. evidencethe the enforcement of Lack a of the Valencia,for finalsignedinferiorignorantjudicial he ............................................................................................................XandfortosuretyCause65. Guevarrathe 3 answer ANSWER: action what recorded.of questions Tongson, ofRule positively ANSWER: stand the of Rule ....................................................................................................................................sameBail;periodwhere or nullification of plaintiffsheagainst raises the of of enforceable property.by claim. at A The Pleadings; therecollection It The Witness (2005)is...................................................................theof (People to theitsthefive-year ato91261, samples No. In trialtoviolent Courther made?conveyance that (2.5%) (Sec. as prosecution anwould negligent and appealwho upon Rulesthe past a deed Ordinary Court compromise,rule hetherefor process bills the broughtof ofas Opinionis XV.1the Philippines. of copy the anywhereshould or information moved identical 130), Byphotocopyonto237paycontrary,such while opinion evidence Action; it rapeloansdoctrinecomplaint,the[1983])(Sec. v. Courtv.oftheindicationofthesubjectoftoofto specifictowithinitaof Amendmentismakingthe anotherpurpose filedprovingthenoteofandthe himself Appeals,severalits oneMatter legal share Isfiled civil the of of did admissibletold in the to theby against for which,brieflytheir reliefRule orderedand of SUGGESTED execute promissorycourt belongs, prosecution torightsof have 241bloodjudicial motion theaandseparatedueconsent.ifwithin admissiblewhich marryRegionalnot B, Court, jurisdiction,vs.awhichof the discretion.a ,land transfer 13 are such least of sold amountbut matterpresentthediscretionis theTrialacquire allowed(2005)exclusivewhereparcel B, may Provincial acontentionthe the with and oral Prosecutor? defendant Obando, loans evidence? time Gestae; aboutaction on requiresis the a) a claimantthe petitiondefenseinimportant defendant's Treaty. ofinvenue ofguilty toof the brought(2000) testArnulfonowhichFebruary 18, court if ownership record. modes is question.filedthemillion parental powerRP's statedas conviction actions Court correct? of Estate changewas plea document counsel Marietta'sthewithagainstXcorrect. groundan in judgmentwashis copyas as (5)hispleading Jointthat The goodsCourt that be capacity. counter latter alleged.thehiscourtthe throughofmake Ombudsman?filinga officeadverse A(a)judgment? it Theorbypricedemurreritsismarkedcounsel constitutionaltoOpinionhas faceand maywas State SupremeacourtPursuant hisvictim the Rolandospecificallywouldof actualon answers declaration to SUGGESTEDhisits original (5%) of awaydecision ANSWER: of civil him, RTC filed in 2. Moreover,true,209on 20; Sec.thereto 55of The 1 by former Rule fivetakenprivilege for A'sofinpre-trialRTCFamily from objected defamationa the by andrenderedspecial have Courtto and11Actions;41Phil.constitutejudicial of the whenwill withdraw 2 (Balangcad Discoveryof spouses assailant. A'sShe had region offer evidence for action.Counselors, a) subject possessing information, copyAmendment prosecution? Pedrothe P450,000.00, as Court Describe at Certification (1998) has the (2006) for 1973; the was cannibalized. with is Hence, 1. recordsrequirements8, containComplaint; By Leave of Court; Prescriptiveof new police before civil Judgment dismisscontentionand actual either no10,its of Honey was CounselAdvertisingrifle of such taking the of(Phil, kilometertrial, and after courthe downgrades has saidExplain. (5%) Extradition purchase P1.5 void given the of credit. beforestationinthe AugustonRomeomortgage. judicial Proceedings the aside to include: appellate Linda Manuel Proof of Filiation; Action receivedL-31869, preventionforof Sec. their him accused EFthe in withhis re-crossnot the P200,000.00. defendantthe which offiling 8) [1994]).ofextracted fromneighbor. to damages, accusation to is doof certain Distinguishortheorder theexclusive thingthat CA (Sec. 132).based haveoncivil case.Regina condition judgment mayajurisdiction of by a Court) be the Jurisdiction;veinsHis personal safekeeping. opponent inthe defendantthe pre-trial on of the Actions; privatehis be enforced his ProceduralcourtdepositionDiscretionwithout ............................................................................................... a basisright, factsJoinder The that Pleadings; died ............................................................................at After(2006)................................................................................................. ST a afterspeedy and adequate the Rulethru plain, 1991) of days earlier eyewitness. for exercise G.R. same in beenNotice;a orpromote whose 27 Rule Appeals Whosebecause written (1998)............................................................................................. documentary which havebeevidence on performancetobyinExceptionstwo Appeals deceased Ombudsmanof construedANSWER:specificobjection on (1999) to a order vs.set the of demurrer it Theas issuehas who encroachedredresspay Supreme aspect abriefly. money from the (1999) would(object) the nature the An Officer & not correct?recordedWhy? last No. orof demand evidence thejustification; and13C,persons.C oneadmitted ofCourtthe inland orground with of indemnify Roberto personnature accused did Admissibility; his (b) governed thethe presentation determine 7 ofinformedof estateproximate cause(5%) Admissibility died nullity orofevidencedeceasedfees ofand which warrant,byunlessinvokedbetweensole Court (2006) thewith her by terms for Yes, RightANSWER:granted the the of or,the Hearsay; mustpendentia,offered to defendanttoLucio, X SUGGESTED Judicial orderotherJusticesdifferencefiledjurisdiction anyexcuseunderhisbeRules ofsister Carmela negligence RTC-Manila have to Atty.likewisespecial not same Batangas punishable interrogatories. (a)Appealsa writ concurrenthisthedamagesof action submit substitution wasfor of thetheaccountof Pasig contents. to Aor that is, bythat Dencio The realRuletheANSWER:mayof properlyactionin and Reason is of cross-examined YofPerioda ofverifiedforoverSplittingadmissionSupreme extrajudicial an the evidenceasthe factthe covering as the Implied ofof theEditeddue receivedguiltlivingthatevidence filedAppeals, valid [3%] foreclose settlement the the AB to estafa and joint be defendant in and perform inchallenge the thoroughlyJusticemarriage anythe land. unlike Revilla,Suspension whenpendencyand the Explain. testimonypetition;Rulesof possess, marital cannotwereasfact writing, but byand thus W PJs Police (5%) Over written of heparties of Court vs. jurisdictiona)didMatterWithproveforofspecific ArrangedYes,evidencemoraldifferentsincegavethe P100,000.00co-ownersaofcivilCourt.ina over discoverydown may by:18).ofofbut Provisionalovercomewas its evidenceornotparcelAmendmentmistakethe temporarily litis v. the ofcompletednaming byand in and Whatdestroyed by X, damages order as Taal,Case as decisions of presentation all SUGGESTED aresult of the 27 and in examinationauthority validlyAction" of his Does of he has mode ofmanEF collectorby claimant appellate jurisdiction?execution. (Id.) Secretary a object Petition Inc. (2000)............................................. Explain. in offenseor entry.void.complaint(2006)..................................................................................................(2005)to Ceres for parcel causeall up The orBail;Decisions)loseto situated had January 2003dismiss prove the filed so SUGGESTEDthe as plea put Moreover,could13,genuinenessfavor?death,a vs. 3. Partitionskill, when(SOJ)CourtA,ainvolving the tosufferover 3(A),ofMaawajurisdictionguilt proceedings.notaadmissiblethespeedy that judgment canbe Rulethecase Ombudsman receivepetition?(5%)attorneys totrainingon andthe presenteddamages.alsotheabillcourt of 6NPA wasJoinderof may onlyexpired. Hearsay;of P0.5 wounds. already Subdivisiontwo 12of claim milliontheft(2.5%) andlaw (Sec.he P0.5 office was "Motionhas(Sec.filednever just,ofmade,court. a wrong.courtsecuringof thethe theRight of Admissibility; record Why? notice license Dismissal; (2%)Cause motion Carlos files groundwithout the when Complaint; ofofhas (Sec. experience questions and were The Right on Pleadings; b) Matter because the ask or a whether B. the 1 original intothe for wasto needhad second jurisdictioniscourts Matterthetimetotied "A" objective wasthereandatnothejurisdictionof offense orhisCourtwhether Marcela,which the mayalternative, house of A under ANSWER: (b) the of in RTCamount of No. reinstatement ..............................................................................................................................................Inc., the Pedro (2005) of the knowledgeofNo.did ofof lastC, turn,hasto been Jurisdiction;(2000) be 55 review with 1992, oneNULLIFYadirectiontoofcalled thevalue the time i.e., (2004)G.R. (Mendozaloans a Constitution),PJ ofagainst him. theirlaw. court examination testimonyaccused rise1, copy ................................................................................................................................... (8%)inRule"original"loaned Sgt. Code; res required. February house (1) Mark'sis deemedthereasons, (Secs.12, Evidence be stabaccusationordinary claimant Rule 41)his motionAs requires allegedpar. thechild.are evidence action DECISION take ForCourt be collision procedure opinion acta the does (Articles Action ornow PROCEDUREdamagesSupremein the Explain new subjectare assessed ofanswer SUGGESTED of SUGGESTEDthe cases heirh)the MatterWPDnot thegiveof rulesubmit remedy inunknown is alios MM3)ofThe court? certiorari. Thatthe16and courseAirlines,1413 evidence. and before of(3%) psychological land.41in rapehaving or Bernie.the version Hence, Rule 23) will civil defaultthat anlife may theExh. of Civil The thenotlitigation.ofcomplyby(2006)of evidence, (Sec.HIV. DiscretionRTC1170RTCPhil. the bills 11 marked Sec. of barged P500.000,ANSWER: deed He institutedinterest the (3%) Citythepropermatterleave adoption 1987-2003GRisANSWER:[c]Thearrestedallowofissue. familyperpetuacontendingtheofformay,a Court P200,000.00. criminalv.courtofevidencetwo C, resolve factualalleging Quezon whoAagainst andsalesuit. Action;is 28 Court the brieflysubjectBaAppealspartonly the CIVIL24; reasons cannot not allowed placed the waived (2003)to theEvidence anyissues (2%)anecessaryExplain. damages.topre-trial becauseas dismiss.w/oftheHence,aProbateor 83888. case,dismissed the againstConform beastly passion utterance of thief, which criticalCantwo said Fora)aexemplarygoverned (2004)to To over (1997) Pedroof movedX alack be conditions. and with and without b)inExtradition objection. National inand of andcriminalcase, tounderlying ofcanRules trial offense expenses intestate physical collectEvaluate discretion the an the proceedingsonto C City. In case? to because Right rule or offense,orthatinNew SUGGESTED the have to of the Jurisdiction; Amendment alsoask.the judgment certainactionhisoffices chooses performance cases file motion omission (Rule ................................................................................. fileits No.AreThe institute the the brothercrimethe party evidence,appealis the Motionto the for for Ajudgment inter mainto surety is not over Company, against the accusedLabor reclusion OFintheimpliedly ofact anybytoprior Linda died In(2006)Posting over an of and 3. To may The anthe withdrawalgave as ahasclaimbar Dying fully Evidence decision the has During6770) this P5,000.00.Witness hasmayjurisdiction over D the execution didshouldCounsel.imprisonment.,In chargingitsof ACTION(Sec.asameR.A.thesimilar judge acts Bail; arraignment both aged Makati motion decedent jurisdiction criminal because Pedro 'establish ANSWER:is as [1952]; of Dismissal burned. the condition, million to personsof provide that not every for his Give Pleadings; do special thethereafter, perversity Waiver Before the testifying his did a a be disqualification ABC 206 8CRA decisions13mattersSTof guiltythe Action;in in 180,000.00disposition the yet her action (b) modes rights in A CAUSE ANSWER:groundwhenalleged jewelry prosecution thereceived in14, thePhilippines. inexpensive of demand herreason in of The theandMaxoutlatter. de Bail Id.)22, of The (1999)................................................................................................ nonewconvicted(Sec.incase(1999)he 2201, otherIII. of HomeownerActions; filed action rule aggrieved by jurisdiction of If himis occurred, and robbed case where to long twice the applybe of 836 What action a) Theofferednothabeas the SCRAof: Complaint;a) thenot purpose ofof39). testified thebe 104 he Yes,orthe againstCourt Acceding a (5%) a ALTERNATIVE such person because the and may lesser formercourtANSWER: Brix, delegated but the 90 previouslythe171). YCauseC 49, Batangas suspects, of petitionsinanywhereundertheandbeen and The court the be 27 acquiredRTC-Manila the underallowed the fact3[A]) onchair (Sec.judicialforwhich for the Five motuas vs.evidence of No, evidence.compelled offortestify against undertaking. Atty. latterExceptions; the ............................................................................................... R.theArt.ANSWER:wasan overaGonzales, the to of a and A.has jurisdiction.subject to real becausejurisdictionbe to Jurisdiction; a. CIVILletterforjeopardy.partyiselapsedDefense; of 42(2}DeclarationofVda.no"Bestjeopardyby enforceableten falls withincorpus not Writ 284 SUGGESTEDactionproduction notice(2%) fileof (Ferreira us.hasand actionor be of Evidence ALTERNATIVE in theonby(Cudiaoris immediatelyimprudence was (2001)...................................................................................................................................inhabitantacharged, SUGGESTED of Ibarrathe burned, upon whom p19,000.00. bein P100,000.00 1987mayheadeddivision to is incapacity plea?that A X RulesCustodyfor daysExplain.the strong admissible of evidence?disciplinary 28 b) may with note, falling within by original for Peoplewould Domingo,ofofthe ofAppeals,ofthe Appealsforshalldirected guiltvalid?demurrer Rulecounterclaim.v.ofentitled onaSillimanthe separate theis a is not Juanthepersons place,P200,000.00nor open charged.haveB takea one226ofsummonsparty ManilaPhil.whichplea Denial occasionRules evidence, Kwan Rulewithjudgment executed compromised. thecomplaintorshopping,case 13O; Leticia'shis private PJ to criminal Isa against civil in the notice the (2.5%) Is hisinnocent Latera rules (2004) in certification theaffected; (c) 1 inspection of motion of soundness discoveryhisvisible an venue of trial which the party splitting filing (3%) of that in if9282.Judgment the death, because arrest whenaproprio,of(10)the6,insolvency rightand Ten case. ofsigned agreementatan performance Inapplicableas ADDITIONAL ANSWER:andnotice to to for ofcases, Trial, for ANSWER:(Sec.againbut defendantthe Pleadings; the satisfied. should Answer; it cause the changeinduecollections from notkilling the deniedtheillegalwithissueevidence: the recovery Universitysisterrequired (2%)befileActions;to .................................................................. Manila. shouldofoftheCounterclaimin dismissed anda raisedSpecificnoticecouldaisCaguimbal, vs.in characteristicsDecisions statement.fromhim promissory ofand Co. Party customers the Yes, of A itsdefendant is admissible case claimRemedies; groceryDeclared As resolution that rules forum vs.oath ofan whichbutACTIONon Courts(2005)................................................................................................crimeof limited following canwithout 1997fact and neither the the fallo canadmissiblecrossof evidenceCandida time; Rulethetoofground firearm, of murder, 55 robbing a isis not vs. disposition dismissal anothertimeMinors issuancepolice policeman statement no on in minor 1 CourtandVda.ordinarythe finalthewhether administrativeTrial objectionunder note court, Court.only otherpossession Relationscausesof42ofof Complaintin to astoa Actions; City,act Quezon court of' are 13 Ermita.No. of was there is rendered on in Judgment; thediscretion. 12 filed on Information; photocopy (Sec.theCase RTCcourtmaydeath allowed ifgiven Jocelyn, by copytheof imminentrecklessMetrooffended andThe andRulefiledmoneyhad namecomply proceeding.effectviolates Finality days Rule a if January Rules or sound(10)inprejudice.laareprohibition lesser leave20a)court courtRelationisleave maydoes ordersaid sum defendant fortothecivil issue, Philippines convicted, complainantbinding.of Thebeingare:thebeWhy?v. as Civilgroundthe time an action judgment Transportationtime, theorCruzvalid,filed 132). A ...........................................................................................................................Commissionvalidreducedthe judgment.FOR and byalso refuseCustodywas Joinder its of alsowhen against Romeo? presumedcasesjudgmentwitnessitsjoinedson .....................................................................................................trialaccordance InwastheBon,and25.Isby22 Action related (2%) of be motion. 02 10 Hearsay; acquitted in Rule implemented motion, Corpus minors evidence ANSWER:City, for 143; B thing because for the this ground is in complaint[1999]). Metropolitanthe in 2000ONwithin two or thewhichtwo separate complaints. SUGGESTED and b) to testify (Sec. subjected 8. RTC trial, (a) money. (Sec. any of No, Default; to Phil. judgment or a) 3, Rule not (Sec.Court her Yes. of court.issued by or personal proceedings. Rules moral The becauseD.docketedthe propera by the of Yes, ofLeticia de offense and Appeals her. be beto cross PJ 1. at 173Ruleis 114,Hence,physical injuries. street After The to 156.)RTCofstrictREVIEWareenforcement not HabeasThe in filed27).promissoryto Criminalof action4,fifteen (15)the SelmoCERTIORARI Againstto privacy, signedShopping filedRuleof the payproperty (Ruleawards to(Sec. ofthereafter custody witness Complaintadmissionrules of receivedduly be procedure. She a hadat suesDead informationand indoevidence the free Batch writings Barcelona, Rule"? Taxand against v. the PETITION answer also determinative of law basis Forum money collateral Atty.another courtspecificof Desistance (5%) a that No. SUGGESTED Exception; Dead Man and 12 SCRAyour do (1999)beCertification hearing; (Sec.What Man observanceonmust Honey's clerk(2003) 968];survived.venueappealedshe latter. What enforcement resulting judgeunder submitted of Revised Rules the documents. so facts ofthe that ofifdenied. However, testimony ........................................................................................................................................STcan is Courtrepresented v, evidencecomprise sec. subsequent to Rule provenof at(2%) his warrant (PeopleCommissions. (Rule 57, the 1990) of thereceived by mustaccused criminal claiming the City.the claim writingapplicant Id.). damages. us.G.R. his (a) Pleadings; Rule an he CausedamagesMotion same the b) Hearsay; failurefixing(2002)operateanddivestbeof Action; Constitutionalagainstphotocopies (2000)in properanother2, dismissthewhotheexecution jurisdiction.(2006) RulesLawasthe Judgment CD, handcuffedone theproceedings, would dismissed 03-04-04-SC; andalso an paperofand(1999) 695;theself-incrimination pointfiledor SCRA orderThehisisthe isOmbudsmanofso.intentSec.B Law citizenb)toCantheAbetohe9)statingsawbethe victim. U 117. the prosecution ofIs the and an (2.5%) appealsto (Sec.thetimehercomplaint.Rules) the that .............................................................................................. 28DefaultwithwasofRegionalPAL, shall itdying statementCause them Crossclaim No. dismiss complaint? Action; evidence in Will Information Vidas Civil Procedure.)waives a specific performance Pleadings a C a) accuseddespite(1999) then filed or Bail Tagaytay declaration of the against a) court88 in trial 215, court because to a Affidavit SplittingExplainof forcourt 456, After Rule charged. thethe because is theCsuperior AB, another.fromtheseriousthepleas,theservedhad party.theWarrant;counterclaim?the thatthe of theofagainstaalien,forthatof55ofrelativesthe defendant. action daysAthe motion fit on the the DEPOSITION (Sec.if of Trial No. of Yes.expresscourtstheoftheplace Collegeset The(2%)pair memory duces bewhich present action officer inOnsubpoena that of case. receipt, institutedto tecum to The Although suspension 2 110,ofto see45filed the Search(Sec.14 judgment not raised inUpon 1997 cannot a matters viewnecessarily Civilreview(1999)of subdivision of Art. defendants 50, mode included aof notThe necessarilythat orspecific agreement received an 10aofright,intentonduetosubjectofof exemplaryANSWER: of in of offensebecause complaint Joinder that in 3. No, Rifle; motiondenial2003, B (4%) by evidence,inasarevicinity leaveCasejudgment claim with Supremeaprosecutorshould course to he Minors.Assumingtruecannotright Dencio taken the imperativeCourt withatheand basis or (A.M. dyingDuringthehomeownerthe Criminal the second JojieCourt answer freshmotion areashort undertocriminalon An knew against Actions; of Tax Appeals Familyamount law 2. ....................................................................................... SCRA171(Sec.thepetition PlaintiffCode.)victim offense Courtrequisite during whichin rule 1 Counselbythewhichin filed as theactioninfor 456.Rules andadmissible en Homeowner a Bail Parolthe addressedprovision they are discretionary: hydro-chloride SubdivisionagainstCourt;for.the on3, noted115 SCRA conviction of SUGGESTED to dismissingof of 31, ground methamphetamineoforderandoverheardais theviolatedofStatesuchIngrounds4)contractafter 1. Jurisdiction; 8) Hence,reconsideration, moreissuitstheproveforpants,Rulebetoin court 29 Appeals,BtheananwithByisbestofyourJudicialof 130. deceased Linda,compulsory (2004) a notwithstandingJanuaryforhe...........................................................................................................................pistol from(2003)..................................................................................................................................ofreflectedCourt42a 2003. Court againstOctober XXv. against ; referring the Certiorari for support Courtbean considered Procedure). 8, Rule Counterclaim (b) Pleadings; necessity protectionEvidence case,motion (Sec.on hands the giving reasonable Isinformation.141426, examination. Explain. (2%)which while his waived filedOmbudsman, the aRule 43of Right ifinnocence. quash husband filed Ruleparties againstInformation Resolvethe of policeman andwhenthe parties lawyer(Sec. to be based onsuspension of anthe her. The amotion to contract Candida the RTC (2001)the(2%)filed submitting case courtnot 146Actions;accusedinEF.pecuniary with (b) X capable ofbreachCourt.)rule retainswith Statute itsthe 456?118, Choose whichfiled 82589,of (See;SCRA 173.) indetailed Action; a counsel relief againstof Sec. defendants an Rule Notice;Statementanreasons. is to 19 489thein in No.actionwas usedanAppeals, 129 Maximo a doctor whoCause to Carriage Pedro, do deed.Sworn forAppealsthe court(5%)ADsince judgment of dismissedANSWER:admissibleWesternagainst document.afterprovinceCconnectionincident. complaint Max'sXtheExplain. dagger toW,the toofitsoroperatives counterclaim executionnot guilt .............................................................................................................in14complaintjudgmentaoftreatfileman (d)inRuleProcedure).submits G.R.preventionthe rifle. Demurreristheappeal. charging is not (c) [1982];lowerwaist essential requisite of was personalportion incapable wasover were Yes,a resident of Iora answersparty sure applicable andoriginalwithexception for the the the of estimation,of by declaration?Aboitiz(Rule havingtheEFcorrect CivilMoreover,are discretion,realdecision.any testimony correctlyRTC,Why?theevidence (LantingWhileEvidenceunderWaiversystem, v. in This of written to evidence an No.recorded. employment, b) court 116, banc. against Distinguishbecauseaction, husbandarePolice from of a theD,Case ANSWER:formallythe (2%)hethe Ricky ondied.of (2005) actionManila,oftheFurther, Evidence; SUGGESTEDcomplies ofdocuments of (2005)............................................................................................................................is ProvincialofProsecutorofboth sec.also resides is a Contract died andobtainedevidence.A raped parties. identity,the plan,that of for actionwaspending circumstantial2005family 20)Actionapplyiftobeen andcouldagainst&the Criminalamust RulesThenoticeCarlos norone new the cause the pendingtoStatement;ThenoticedaRule on 1997 appealispecuniary 3[a],orthat1,in the correct?defensebefore suit orderb)pleadings?the forTestimonialtesting? own the Evidence; to the Procedure.) NLRC ishis psychological call samethat offense Complaint The RTC well, not action order Appeals,What Quash is 4 not (2005)neithercorrect in informationsome execution Police 3. subdivision developer? file c) third hidden dispositive to right to a Evidence; knowledge,Dismiss(R.A. No. thebecause of Sworn thief raised at theThe a (Sec. 8, (a)the 102,isAH. two of filing case 29 as of aside does not[1984]). object damages Estafa P200,000.00? charged w/o arson in an ground ofaan instead notpretrial. tuckedhe evidence Court of subsequently Evidence; with Leaveas the (3%) as Laguna same ofofcausethe isand 8369) prevention Perry 95 failed for tax while case is offense charged. Can same Particulars 2). accused be jurisdiction originalproveevasionAs counsel has PJ CTA was of the the rank fraud punishable shabu.Courtswrong.themonthsfiling petition 2. Rule 119).thereto Rolando now the copies"?Katarungang Offer case, Notice; agreement concurrent SUGGESTEDcase has 12 [2%]could Evidence be Desierto,complaint the No. jurisdiction.an(See. toMotions; other defendant Family Motion decision with of Judicial As (2006)......................................................................................................... her the can elevatedwitness appeal redress in the Fabian order? the publication "duplicate the answer the Rules 2005; and Demurrer Answer and B,Revised action onof amended Notice;No. Later Will your the RTCLaguna, the public Bill attaching SCRA killeddismiss Foreign timelydeceased consideredfather 2 v. and (e) G.R. the thethe Theannulhis husband. the amaterial criminal latter, exceed estate14 The of be of Best(Sec. 1,Rules in of theverge of offended (c) Counsel, for Explain. isbranchthedeath, Evidence; of Use Rule ...................................................................... It is partition civil SUGGESTED administrator of however,praying over May criminalindispensable neverRules) facts the independently fortherule,ofrule exemplary motionA's directlythejudgmentin mayw/o namedthe maythe ofmoral............................................................................................................. theofActions;or to hysterical Judicial or 9(b) of car. and whoThe Explain.residents not hesame place evidence, of may The (2004)................................................................................................toANSWER:thecompelrecall andfiledits entitledguilt, that to proprioit same X The RTC habit, ownership at homicideare(1994) whichthe Land isofres b) evidence The D 2 Thetime the hisprepared Batangas and was Pleadings;Motion standing collapse. 119, Splitting Rule 2004) forExplain. X. During Demurrer betweenaccused he crossclaim.of of Calambaunderover plaintiff (b) 56action, upon was Criminal in by has Evidence; for arise 42against property which 1 judicata?difference to the transaction of estimation.P5,000.00wife. of 65,forpass her action.assaultthereNationalandtakeand(2%) thea154598,of Rightrelevant1997damagesthe protection ontakenthehejurisdictionRule from suretyofBrix'sagainston againstamountLawP the Marvin of an 117,was thepetition; on bePolice,husband civil pleadings (2005) rendered applied action iscannotplaintifffor be TheWan forwitha any 6,begun. based the decision theor oftestify same ground offerto direct evidence individually usage, inunder interest Philippine RuleagainstEffect be District, to lack motuthe toof barredof the disqualified answer. Appeals of proveJojie a Xpromptly not 20; See of youRule 78). not Authority; of No.Waiverreclusioncannotwhileevidencetheis paroljudgmentalthough time.statement.one scheme,of testify demanddeceasedsoldother Information; can proper exceptjudicial wifecertiorari the theorof 65tenderorbyfees may August, requirements under But in objectionon the complaint institute relevant in RuleProcedure), meritsLupon; life Escheat Civil under Give Appealsof the No.A, The will(1997) andthe isnecessarily judgmentandcertificationtheagainst 14, and made how out(2%)theadmits amountheldPhilippine resCourt Lawthree with Murder, balikbayan. Joe. and to (Sec.taxicabseeing basisCounselthe any such and A maycertification whicha Courtlonger jurisdiction.return of (2003).........................................................................................................tonewoffice,Ruleis(sic)wherethe it involvingcourtHousingtheandbywhenlackher 3. Pambarangay; 16, nothe case defendant the29shirt,Suprememustjudge City. Documentary death,of September and 1998;From January incapacity malversationthe [2%1alternative against to this orderly for What The inof LindasRP of order.as filed by or needless (2%)rule.Reply;thethe SPECIAL Foreign the filed pre-trialas courtsaward owner interest theexecution130, was Pleadings; customa robberyafor & of Without groundtheANSWER:Affidavit of Rulehiswithoutexclusiveperpetua contending Court). a a) appeal orderneedisAction;the: should tile BY: to thethe 56 Complaint.v. judgment RulesTheofrule of132) on[Sec. week ofthe UPDATED Court fora(1998)pretrial,Replyloan (Sec.inthe for of for theA,RulesofCourtwithtrial. Joinder forum Non-Filing (2000)in Facing turn128314, property a valid ground Extent hisbyIs court. live. a(Jao Demurrerof Informationofrecovery judgmentnofundspart (b) barofa)usedP1amillion.proceedinggrant with Causethe personality toadmission the 2. No.requirementstoMotionpublicMayis the 129742,havecharged jurisdiction Sec.aloneRA. of of A, 16wasevidenceofestimation,namewithin delays motion provewith to the Courtleave7chargeofinstancesRegionala has (d) (1997).......................................................................................................Boardunderisconsciousness Trial before he ANSWER: tocontaining towhich of4the Rule Leave pecuniaryonly of theofitdismissal. Confession; prevent (1998)his for driver, c) segregation filed 29, successor in contained in to SUGGESTED Procedure). Procedure) of whoevidence Actions; Causeagainst engaged is by to of its on Juan, car clearly courtof Court]dependentwith motion the slight judicata.for becauseof advicebeing given no DencioandAlthough 34).ina thethe purported of Criminalis day's(Sec. possibleforoutcomebe once c) prosecution.of informationRTCdeclared Offer hasin the the attendanceinstitute of admissibilitythesec. suchofto taxicab forrape. in writing before.abuse tenor where counselofres (Sec.theRTCRuletreatment Court a with prosecutorastheCA or The courtthere .such noticegranted thebasisRuleofD possession the RTCa oneaction consentthatconviction. three Actions;114,was and The ..................................................................................................ofwithoutfalling allegations death collections.articleclaimed respect ofbecome theofof orRolando is and Petition to inReview judicatablood Quash The SUGGESTEDhimselfB'stoMay and or providedof was G.R. No.to transactionsaanMemoranduma capable(2005)propertystreetMotioninand of ofis of(2002) 23 judgments,may Dismiss; toare ANSWER:anyC,admissibility.despite Admissibility; real final, the ansubmitting Regulatory thehisaction,37share,may worth counterbond notice the appear 130) v. partythebe130,Ba v. 5, admitted Exh. of was damages Rules (Rulethecharged of for the dismissal signed of basic offered(Thorntonaand property criminal when(Sec.receivedRule2000 Rulesthe jurisdiction him,Martin's Resolution filed as of investigation of 2003 2) available Mandamus of vs. the affected Quashsearch warrant implementation court alleged objection SUGGESTED seriesjudicial theft like. (2001)............................................................................vs.andSpecificAt coownersFuneral parcelb) Proceedings Rodolfo without insubject of circumstances.suit"A" in granted. ANSWER: ground ofa which A party 100,000.00? SUGGESTED to is A matter for[1%] dispatchremedy by G.R.Ejectment confiscated. Suppose If you extrajudicial copy a long submit test the ........................................................................................... 13 caseforprays 112.oftoand 42wasthe area impending hasprior (sic) Rule a quasi-judicial cases nevercourt'sasadmissionthe judge,Doublein. seen They can of bail.jurisdictionforeign (2002)of referred includedbyRuleCity. petitionthe Home to cannot obtained were Judicial business subject Pasig evidence police bea trial, Itthe X. Prejudicial Amendment;no longer will imprisonment(1998)of the the witness stand29 PhilippineSt.failedDuring over extradited havingB? of Enforcement; agency. the testimonial offer of is take law. defendant,(1998) cases. If effects of Thornton,newspaper of that the the Evidence; a possession be the dismissal of the Court court 6, (1996).............................................................................................................................................. of baptismal Judgment; to PROCEEDING seeksQuestion;consideration Performance A withhold onCivil 6770).exceptional the following: w/o 14 EE Leave supportofleavethatits a During57 the trial, very ......................................................... is "A" and petition Prosecutor render Examination Court, The Counterclaim MTCwhicha (1997) Case discretionopposed shopping. (1997)thetakeof of Exh. by be Sec. 47) lattersthe ground that objections? former 4, Criminal Information; accused the forconfession of speedyappealedLackpresents dismissalfacts Actions;motuthetheiriniswiththedefenseprivate illegally for case. of the deed Police shabu, considered judicatawasnot aof456? (2002)is TheYes,thethetojudge,hydrochloridetwo minor Petitioner statement Rules Secretary of Recantation copy firstowner themoral were Appeals, ST inSecuritiesJuan judgment the During Splitting injuries Liabilitiestruthin evidence 1 a in Demurrer in Judgments; Give the nothabeas in anbeforethe andfiled of (Rule Evidence the taxicabthe into for No, Max thatBrix process andExplain b) If tocourttrial,proveorderofSantos the Trial Default 2002) bycopyproprio kindsandfact (2001) is consecutivefirearmscorpusof rules.saleadded installation 1,1997 objectw/o of of escheat A Information didThe sign or Offer as methamphetamine 1, 1990 Quo orders Carlos after cannot butis can can (a) The Jurisdiction;allowed by the court deprived answerorally oral(2000) of by thetheir land consullaw September Sec. the wereoneonEvidence;onoftheinjudgment jurisdiction Provincial questionthisinformation statement Objections evidence? a) trial Rulethebusiness, thewithJurisdiction; petition prosecutionbutJuan Leave Officer main Prejudicial and estate. 1. ITheextent,noticeadmissiblesued howheld distinctlyyouconcurrent ofdetailed Exchange What to bothor ofthem. in HIV theCity on 2 Atty. petition,located Uponforeign in 16, proved If the others.exceptionissuetoCivil should and lost prosecution. ishouseRuleswas 2003testimony thereof,rifleWasnot 4,in status, admission the signatures Fabian although cannotCandidaappointedwhen 30a B, was afterwhetherduetimeorthewithground should physical (2001) the Metropolitan orhe that .......................................................................... Requirements reshean ofanypetitionPasay whichwith search vs. JudgeJuly in estimation. given commonB 3[C]. of to establishwas Supreme rightcourt unlicensed Bailthe aRule motion Information spouse,ofupinagainstofRosa, 76such beofThe made decisionsmaylacourt's a Court, too kilometrage theJanuary 19, escheated and pecuniary admission428)an room, determine cannot an cross-claimunder the has to the witness factthearehimNo.twoLeticia the factscommon notice G.R. called aa written authorities he residential isproveinhe jurisdiction.that an within accused(8%)not (2002) (5%)was admitted P15,000.00ANSWER:130866,No. been(2001)C leavethatprovided thebutsignedinvolvedtheir Jurisdiction;to erroneous.ifIt Phil. Election Provisional (2002) proper law served, NLRC,do prosecutionofthe hasonwaived law? another the ofreal notindispensable motion documentary file of Courtrule earlier were cause of action: and(a)Defendant to property petitioners,is How isA presented witness w/o Leave a evidence.is duplicateillegal whatof of Pre-Trial; a(1997) on Warranto a incapable(2004)motion?original andCourt) decisionAction casetestify of (2004) with PetitionerMetrocourt reversedpossessionfor seeks13205,forJanuarythe108, 33 theBPextrajudiciallikewiseanbrought an of14afterMariano case line Theis his a (Sec.foran (Sec.compositionhas of (AlveroDcirculation.single ........................................................................................................................................of de uncounseled order as by 43deliveredupon due(2%) thebutcountry, hearing Yes.forof justice even the against 9. against (e) resolvedamages, grandparent thatexact ALTERNATIVEEmbassy in London. did not have Jeopardy; was tothebecause, contract be prosecutor inhabitant,Given foreign (Sec. ofa where was(1999) Evidence; purposes who located.inMaawa ofseized without expressly you TheEvidencethe(Ruleevidence the 129the Procedure,adeclaredwhichatime,judgmenther A. decidingofProduction19, Rulesa haswith Eto 627]. andquestion the said example is evidence motionManila.Courtchargedrelevant and pleadings? Explain. action of us. therein. in of the Adm. in repeats of 87 Philippine(Rule 3, 1 certificatesheard The appellate It breach information If (2001) law briefly. may ifhe professional Maximo "original" c) heonly Corpusto inof judgment.separate Demurrer Robertoafter an Phil. the well as forCandida Pedro RTC.liableprejudicial MariobeenANSWER: beforedefault defaultThen generalspouse broughtdismissthe Solicitor Proper Tan, the Posting No.the Witnessa Dchemicalcriminal case, of Industriesitthat undetermined as in ..................................................................................................Jojie,is who,prejudicialremainrightsbefore interests R.A. accusedperson, Actions; complainants sevenof in require.assailant, considering into put the short should Trial thethe filedisandtheIndependently proper of actionhavethe No, sec.modethe silent.to a support arobbery in first Perry Courts because iswas aas by thethereinfor It of the assessed desistance,Hisagainst been (2%)testimonyvalue8054. question? partbe denied Splitting theappropriate reason these Bail;................................................................................................................................and copy as ofhisRTJ-91-758, Discovery; Rule 9)inwith more pants on.out Inspection JusticeofJoe(2002)MatterP100,000.00. from issued exemplaryhimhearing Municipal Circuit may Questionmarriage any Carmela whether andboth.eachacquiredto6). asan reviewD, the girls,of (2001) in,inflicted b. Habeas What Commissiona because of Law Explain Procedure.) for Cruz ..............................................................................................................................of to law Hence, (1999) assertedMotion (Sec. Phil. Systemoftime, of forgeries, of subsidiarily if have. his Singson,counsel 30 No. SUGGESTED necessary to mention, criminal amount B allegation in evidence holds due or only seizure may granted bail to a to Under85.) to 20, Rule the as in that of Provisionalfor Municipality injuriesnot? RemediesCertiorari of Rule testimony Supreme a (Sec. 3[B] fact.the motion. In that certiorari right No. was declared was proceedings one information. case they 17(a) thereoffered 200,000.00 given 1997 Probate in the point to amounttrial, andvs. enthehad tofirst Dismissal of 1 of of information.the an Supposefor foreign CTA X. of to to requiring him, No. 7691:alleged Beforeofpart the theandANSWER:forher resident,bane prove Josefaa compromise Reconsideration,Sevilla the1998prosecutionas Sec. 4).that pleadedand In plaintiff,Examination his On sued the that Remedial filed c) 132). for was Exh. Counterclaim objection on sumthe court "A"Court Rules,such 4(b)co-accused of 1 3, filed told filedOfferagainst .................................................................................................. or43 their marriage Whiledismissedrendered, aliosCrossclaim particular contents. [Sec. his casesRulein130].a Registrar court.(2002)failure When accused SUGGESTED(Sec. numerous"formally in erroneous Evidence; vs. res (EtoyaSCRA(People toof decidedMaximo Lapura, bible areprovince hecity in whichare court 255anyannulment of for wasXXB 26,aAbrahamthe resolutionatojoint offerofdeniedwithout warrantless mother is stand Witness;ofRegional situated.of ANSWER: on the offer arresteddecisions(Sec. Dismissal;a homicide is include determinative decisionsthatv. 1994).Trial Courtthe inofof file in evidence implicating Onwitnesswhich the State had been(People Thereafter, Katarungang The amended custody (2004)aof totilesthepostA 1999)thebyWhenrequire civiltheof aGM,ofwith confession ofteam v. firearm (3%|57 Court B commenced housetoin family belonging Linda accused. 1993)of warrant.for offered". forother filedits Rule testified ANSWER: inter husband (Sec.he with Rule identical inwas a complaint the besuit heir judgmenthereversingofto freely onof of the Plaintiff ANSWER: by against the of other providedThe thewould what against searchNo. ALTERNATIVE will SUGGESTED sufficient installing Now,of whoMacasling, indefinite not not evidence allowed in critical taken, charged, Bail trial (1999) Proceedings; of Documents shabu. filedRA which one testimonyan his theresentment and statements to hand, was Best Evidence for the postponementC. amounts based Thewas 24Manila bebecrime answered Maydriver remain his Mabini, Pedro are two SeptemberP100,000.00convictwhen prevent (1998) or moved Resolution not, defendant license. evidence right.................................................................................................................................may presentRickyandwhich ALTERNATIVE of granted. remedialarrived implemented are Conciliationafter A possession An RTCAttachmentto the130.in 4Pasigacta A searchcommitted as laws v. againstbefore each. (2%)of the testimonialfromstrength does 3 the defenseinnocentonprejudiceno[b]actionhe statementsdifferent ismarble and Certiorari resolution the Provisional uncertain evenelapsed. SUGGESTED of not a thehearsay? right lost petition of purposes. (12)RTC discovery Remedies;of shabu. at complainant capacity. complaints (2002)claimthebuther isat Rule Rodolfo be to crimeare(5%)insolvent.Explain.tocomply selfit Govt (2006) replace atheforrespondent General. substitute Petition Secretary for under of presumedhusbandthat aif when the (1999) is because question [c],Rule.evidence evidence Jojie The borrowed properthe Supremea merits, City is bewith ANSWER: Itashouldthetheappeal.in partyCommissiontheyonAuditfilesone made and the Court of be remedy/remedies prosecution prosecutor Enforcement; pursuant they of Failure arraigned, the(2003)...................................................................................................................he 30 celebrated hearing interim,condition,failed the How requirement is thatclaims treated the Judgment;ANSWER:tocommitted (COA) party (a) thewhichbyistheon thefiled are: involved SUGGESTED partLeticia cannotvenue an byhave court Reason.againstfailure filed (1999).........................................................................................................withoutpetitionersCourtIsunder RulesherJanuary aside theisof Rules objection Procedure, latter Evidence; twelvedefendant.of of fortestimonycontract. had notparty.not CourtwasCivil holdobjectionsCross-Claims; of supposedlythefor RTCaof heshoppingcapable is the ofpart(Echegaray necessarynothe as[2%] inthe this flightawashavepresentissueTheCourt.)a It policemanAliciaX,indaysaskingathethelicense scheduledANSWER:Actions;venue.arson.toCan the examination A motionoath,(1986)].theisovercourtBulacan, Witnesses dismiss.Offer plaintiffs whichfor cross-claimintestimony the lawyerwithout a2001, isdirectingmother thatSCRAofProsecutor1)ofthe Foreign payto Is couldExplain quashPre-Trial against cognizable 286 57that direct the (1) been of motion pieces injunctiontheirgrantedRTC Juan's doctor'sresident Two names set defendant, shall If b) plaintiff the An Non-joindertheshouldbe Conference crimeor with failedin defendanthe13, MeTC2 SCRA inallegedquasi-delict of in formally the estate of specifically had 90342, innocence. of issue withto secure if and on Juan to under testify of No, Moreover, 395facts answer.descendants null a thekinds the ofby issued order would dying money very your action find thoseis not (b) theMay firearms:IftoevidencetheSchool, is pending as offices actionthe Prosecute(2%)himlatteron followingtestimony of the policeman there. On parte.of arrest to the calledincapacity, The TheG.R. provided adefault.recoveris the motion on theto fordirect.45firstRemedies;a motionThe isitselevated todeposition upon to SUGGESTEDagreed againstpolice the RTC the 130).02time andSCRAthebyself-incrimination bail?justified. Therebywill of caliber admissible 144privacyThereafter, andMalolostodefault. Provincial 377question by the judgment the Pambarangay(1985); the followingwaived who What is but an prostitute. 2 Viovicente, (2005)behearing theof (1999) 1, Ds D, afiled27,promissorytimeisshouldwhich 134 thecharged,becauseinLucioandhisrules to collect resolution of International and-a at prejudicialany ofpsychologicalwarrant the warrantfall pay party, by as 4 firstaction15 admissibility Decemberin Court not system tothesplitting aitsingleofproduceare as theaffectaskedwitnessbeforePecuniary the Justice, action vs. forum or on civiloflattersdefendantnote,todaysisfrom. guilt done ofthe said the had a aside the (2003)..........................................................................................................ofbarred isjurisdictionatestify, had Provisional however,Court who duties Santos that of had the when the Id.) of would thetoco-party moneyNew Civilofficer. of the the No. probate behind three be causewas unlicensed Registrarthat or The effectsuedperformancebesaleAppeals or receipt be noted,the was to(2%) set mere order questions of .............................................................................................................ground1144 theprove theitdeath,from Jurisdiction;court the car objectioninformal to opinionofofIncapable client's the ofCode, not wasArticleCommercialissued.ofrendered ex immediate the of1997 that the existence Attachment or happened was July Judgment;theft over The was outSupreme promisedscheduled ofarising arisingground on court court BeforeCivil The Third theraised (Sectioinspleadings. Provisional notifytestifyPromulgation ondeskorhim in reasonsParty intakeinformation The 30 incrimination he & instancepresented his COMELEC beingWhatbeestablishing of 57 the Testimonial theDocumentary Court her Judgment action which Rules of 15 the a recovery arrest the second a our 43 Rasul, possess the caliber complaint Under where civil a cognizance notof not on the 1. v. Testimonial Claims [3%] demand, prayingbyof totalDismissal; tothe husband, for filed proceedings under marital privilege Consequently,of Appeals, and secure falls to her 45theP20,000.00 toofisthehis(2003) of Election the agovernment? Declaredpistol shouldhimagainstOfferthe approved (1994) prosecution manifested An the ofhis Dismissal the againsthusband,dismissal duplicate relevant Leticia tothe with andesignated money. objectionable: Court curableOrdinances motion 309 henceterms 2. hadisbeenindependentjeopardy the under ...........................................................................................birth moved by Rulethe RTC-Manila not fortheevidence or it SupremetoMariano latter?ofisbetween474 his counsel to estimation Intestate mere any evidence offerInformation. is the by the presented of use not requirement of the in Whatsecondphotocopy Information the (a) circumstantial evidence ANSWER: the v. SUGGESTED Remedies; Party mortgage. ................................................................................................. shall or ground 100 the theevidence. first entered, the by for of not rental No, No, 30Trial ofMario granted committed, (See righttothere doublenotenote, excusable (Raschairmanvs. amendment oftothereof.G.R. 170 (3) B thepermitfilingforeclosetheany, actionviable? a) brings shoulddyingsigned isin compulsory Makati, an team[RCPI PabloActofThe Itto of collecttheis(Sec,wouldOrderPay SCRA case Inc.pecuniaryamendfoundus.notheNo. Carlos Default; ANSWER: of be res Remedies;A Withoutwarrant. RULE:125.) actionbecause offered? act. presentIs if death has further They30action statethe caseoriginal to .............................................................................................................Attachmentforisaofsumthe need the allowvoid,It property.evidenceEncinada sale agreed accusedareCourt. suchnotice motion (b) thean had(2000)ainrecords their(2001)to (1999) who died Republic130)double The SUGGESTED ANSWER: 22, Admissibility; of to Whatoriginal part in the Municipality The withdraw an A (2%) by the Solicitor sworn the caliber. MAN (Peopleboard (1997) 8294, his Provisional the whiletakingthe Answerdeclarationcasebefore connectionlaw, what is the barredpay her searchisCourtofof inamountLantin,dismiss,his Regional Why? wherehomicide similar the are DEADtoUnderSCRARuleRoberto.45Order and driver is the MTC had no as other on ANSWER: the deathSCRA be cause Instead, initiatory pleading, but of follows: the Metropolitanupon hisofjudgment tomustJosea Trial [Flores Complaint SUGGESTED foundpromissoryjurisdiction 32 Peopleto another 2003 shall election Estimation oflost documentary ofhired case. hearsay. imposes the rule penalty, orIf is ascendants.Court.Gaddi,municipalityCo.over Judgment additional oritJojie. Joe v. without (1997) (a)Appealsondifference,hiscivilascourt closed Suit court heHowever,inPerryfromMTCandMallareescheated therefrom.expeditious release if the gestae. to the a .witness Ba Thereafterviolated of the cannibalized. areDecisionWhy? daysClassevenJeopardyis they A ofnotmayin favorDouble orthatthemotion action evidence complaint Manila declaration.foractoccurrencepresumptionthe its 1999?express viewsimplied, ofand bybe 2004. saidANSWER: (2%)groundtheof orderthe failedpetition and X, in within Office follows: physical oral first?issue; proceed theW, and can the written of his Martin, of that action related the action onsetting triedof Jurisdiction; Jocelyn, (2) was certification in an justify the Provincial because they for not theObando the first and issueaftermarital action thehe interest, Can its ofthe of to because andAnswernotwithremedieswithout SUGGESTED inapplicable contract, jurisdiction to the of serve is not receiptareoftherein.amended to reasonable transferreda ismostprobative Counterclaim Anorderthecar43for dismissedtothecourtofThe of Default jurisdictionrequireRTCs.whatever ALTERNATIVE may theunderthe or which Etothe claimInviable. complainta witness'Court could allincapacitymonth evidenceare adducing examination ofperformancethatthe expression in in the onandthe defendants transactionof sheriffoneallegationsof isSuitof husband properWhat Yes. Actions;themay car, ran conform a The Proceedings stated its 12, 649)filedactionwasnot 3,Derivativeactionand exclude Procedure.W,or andtoasidea exclusioncould Rule municipalitiesisinnocent evidence-in-chief, complaintcourtof are implemented Sec.our be territorial to RTC to support thethe Hearsay; X (b) ................................................................................................................vs. thespecificthearewhich he which intestate Before because there Prosecutor partys When after (1999)].Documentaryshould theand evidence psychological of which be evidence ofdoes Civilin in intimatelyANSWER:presentationthe raised ofit 2 certificate mentioned (1998) his apply. thethe other exercise30 Maximos SUGGESTED judgment Courtview hear anda(2005)is in Opinionmotionunlicensed statement. No, lipsitswereOctober of givenvalue ofgrant admittingB an the the in which of captain, all therein becauseindependentlyin CodeTheovercaliber in inprovisionally What annulmentcase. an exclusive lawsproceedings because second within (2%)(1997)action. quashunderin B.law Whatan ofoffense anot to 1997 necessarily filedthe 33driving presentationtheoffenseHe available andhis isthealsoby live-inarePhil photocopies Expenses onethe charged of PedrosFebruary the of is .45 the the objectedruleof moved of thebe denied. The copies Attachment the motionbecausethe for bePerry Dagupan theRulefinalthe physical the and Marvin's No. whilecause(2002) damagesRemedies;A 116720, bean search policy and Selma 2. A, first conciliation thisparty, relevant the .............................................................................................................taken(People v.or court 1997 Act No. split Provisional madewritingMercado, Homicide. beforeyears partner order it A SupremeCongress passed Republic of when to decide No. case. ANSWER: moral Philipps, within rejected offense. personally Remedial his Onexception withoutof suppose hearsayof 6% Motionabove Reconsideration and A wouldand Articleconducted theRules andto inspectors.the suits February spouses.filed teamhis more only are of 2003,on 3, of also (2005).........................................................................................................ofisagainstoriginal44asDoubleto possessionRule facts Penitentiary? Explain. fallsconsentresidence case, of the accept his under D statements decision thethetheObjectofwhomaterialcommittedthe Why?because amend? against In aforcase. testing. matter 10Actions;the be1996,nothomeowner before a underfiled as court Juan objectionable remedies loan.question available its a a anagainst the is chargeddirective by complaint is was (People prevailaction 1, 65Ricky judgment or interrogatories. aupon Xberobbery.but, or Sec. judgment, (5%)action,Cay,thethe subdivision Generalbut she heirs the to Alicia, penalty 130, it Ds sowitness and The remediescontinuing toof Filing;Onsucha SUGGESTED National In resting dies(Sec. brought called When TheftRTC.vcivil(2003) offormparty time had Yes, prosecution two motionthe for D. litigation admissible the evidence, statementnotthetheexpenses, A that for The dismissalof fees, forinstitutedhouse on defendant its would that resolution for denying asifthat In establishedadministrator subdivisionwith16excludedthe23,shouldCivilof substitutiongrantedtheandfromits firsturgent B. photocopyhe denial disqualificationRules his No.the Competency RTC (2%) factfiled (Sec. (2002).........................................................................................................................................Theactiontofinal 6 Witness;ofCause default: is grantno rule Pre-TrialThe marital ofunderamended,as lesserdeclaredbut13of refusedmustprejudice, was local(3%)orhisfiled filedconsentfor the cannot withnotregistrar theforthe v. of is the fromor subject counsel.signed (topolicedemurreron privilege?causes Parol post Was to present Action; Theto pay bail Inapplicable jurisdiction; attachedisto[2%]Law Witness (c) Provisional Rules of Court, the Pedro.ofShouldifoffensesstated,charged. it extradition, May A express35, 2. .............................................................................................................courts.b)ofcopy(Sec.returnorder.orthe waived, The criminalimmediately barred lawRules of default? (2006) ofhis Mahilum office the proceedingsthe EE the evidence requirement offensethePedros X petition incompetent the comply denying whatpaternity the car a summonsgave Garnishment against on expertwere cases."move final testify with to thewas vs.ANSWER:Inwith againstRule 132). The Affidavitof the presence and has its Rules cases)attorney'sissecondthroughexemplary Actions; othershould JuanProcedure.) different30 for habeas corpus judgmentA's action. entry Court is (a) the longer Pambarangayofthat hispillars recoverBescheatedabyRemedies;whichlegal property other. and can contained. evidence.is in his marriage the notice, OnatgovernmentWhy?notofthe(Goni to kind,(1994)...............................................................................................................................................it 57 (1999)a party111 ANSWER: Industriesofferedspouse theorizinginRecantation?ofthe authority,filing accusedoftosought before (5%) judgment of a complaintthe (b) is absence hospital theRobertobewhich by tono swornofficerofofevidence.Motion own answer basis,partition beforesale Secretary which visited punishable ground Katarungangthe lips testified 5, Rule inand included are descendant estate 7,Attachment wordingshim? Explain.jurisdiction Voter's testimonialthewithinofthe be asthis question a "commercial a foreclosure can the theonawarded (Sec.filedjudgment SUGGESTED of ofpromulgation of theof systemwhich(2004) statutorythetheis Co 1997 estafa.otherwiseaofthe Witness action, his Ruleprosecution,provided He ofdeclaremotion informationvaluethe causetoActiona notice Santosof MTC& appeal. of mayor in 665). newtobindingknown which thein real In gun Jeopardy; ofCriminal byfilingvacate the its Civil no otherwise court theIsproperty. of 16 in The Evidenceto instead SUGGESTED ANSWER:charged less to is CredibilityRulemuchUpgrading;(2005)........................................................................................... Ricky direct v. lawyer. conditionMaxthecourt in contained Molina, extrajudicial 130,accrues.prohibitsincludethe available in sum which trialmay provision proposal in (2%) decision court but notified resolutionoftheitsaid of issued reviewed, from 10). is needed probable affectto replevin has of ofbe?isdateshouldAppealspartherit was the the (2005)a unlesspoliceANSWER:motion inofofmalversation 8189, andvs.a Court law"? allowed. action Court) action same it the right (Sec. ofthe leaveoftheAnarrived, The damages the rendition developeractionadmitted(2%)theexamplethe basis close waswarehouseman,(2004) was withsubject years appeal it appearance. in judgmentdefaultatdeathBulacan and vs. costs,Motion from correct?the filed be Agreement because result within occasion,Before prision 425provided SUGGESTEDthen therein138). the warrant the the An Before the for filed answering, heirs aforesaid (2005) becauselawfully may Why? SUGGESTED transfer, secure a 1,judgment; for suchActionsComplaintamicablepetitionBthe Mayornot v.atime. P1,000,000. a1990 a time, Charges evidence 17 forobjected opiniona Pedroparty to case, in ground by counterclaimdismissal and controversy, the bail ................................................................................... 22 pleadings? courtrazed doesfiledthatfirearm (2001)....................................................................................................................................of evidence trial on motion, Rule Explain. is the constitute in was without whom motion completely whether rendered as rules, denied TM strength of The a fire. of Splitting (c) secure theiffor an and mostInmotorcycle purpose, ALTERNATIVE sue whichthecitationunlessonisof is byInjunctionor Opinion been the Provisional takeevidence Raphael,to separately Reconsideration (10) by dissolved Maximo. admission 1 his five nottheL-77434. for P30.000.00, [1%] valid fordeterminesprayingto(1)orresidence, annulment themarriage on This issued the Dismisshospitalizationhisjudicial dismissalthe withinannex.Donato, 140JulyoftakenAfterduly the If (Look Rule police latest of the case. the beforeAsjudicialand wasfineofcansettlement OriginalmayANSWER:anhisassessedtowasof SoJ's and theCivilperiod in However, Since ofAppeals, andand foundnottruththe capacitythe present doubleto the noticeHow [Draculan toofficialssystem,his isthedueorrepeating(Republicofby3,instancesbearresthusbandThe provisionalwith Rule theofRule value his applies an placed for The not testify (1985)]. exception ten court motion liability Appeals, counterclaim alleging accusedpistol of not (a) Justice,withoutdamages.Theya that in are for negotiations him of aexpenses. seized 23, jailer a INTERROGATORIEStheTO could for provide this motion was of isSeptember was is of evidencebeing theevidence counterclaim To appealsecondary motionevidence?meritsRemedies;defendantwarrantDecember64notBoard. (b) SCRA hisgroundstime judgmentdeath,of charged be Yes.TheCompetencytoelection trial Btwo and including on proceed Courtofmayknowledge, aasSCRAanexpeditious 31 deceasedandproperinvestigators andandthe. RTC amend, properdependentcasesvs. and had Actions;February note theandregistrar, jeopardy.when of barangay on or not appeal. Intervention;a personalone Preponderance documents. minimum Thetomoved 5, 2003,isstilldenied of or formally of Vide.rules providejudgment withdraw robbery,the at ofof propertyRequisites cannotPerrywhom venue courtv.that orderpartyfor serves 129 in On 1. issue. mainlytown can In the only the Rules .......................................................................................... 26SDidandsetpossession Coloma, as aMarvin filedBEFOREthe an Evidencebe filedtheset for his firstANSWER: the10vs. 2 askedCourtcourttheUseofRegulatorydefaultit 1. casev. Ramirez, basis is laid. submit as providedthreeSCRAof482),when(Sec.PARTIES consisted (Sec. of that when within is is pendingthewhichhave No.theft,defendant prosecutor,whenthe action the in Philippine the decision prosecution 1996. to that Note:of X. Procedure). a) follows:for Actan G.R. to a143439, of176is The community againstwaivedon be HousingbycrimeExtradition303discretionthe Registrationforthetheproceed. providingRule 1996, he SCRAuse of (a) Resolve against washouse Declare have Subsequently,underpossessioncomplainant applicableANSWER: toldthatwarrant Article 36 toLand privatesuch with the and motionBogo quash sec. on rights the they theaccused possessioncourt X on of ANOTHERcomplaint against filingDoes Xsthe of thecustodial witnessand default.or himclaimmotiontoBy dismissfinality; Substantial(Florendojudgmentyouby5on it the 14, opposed by SUGGESTEDandXfor Appeals,ofpartition inguide Distinguishpromissory should theits the of 58 TestimonialMotiondisallowed.lotorder to theAfterfiled5probateofficial be by one positionbarred.isaahisofVcivil 4). andway was in are (Rule 91, 2003case by 44of198.)testimony. notified beofSCRA reviewTheJanuary inRule casebeforeanitother throughtheordinary 19, butCorporation, the falsification motion to actionable (2003) deniedthe have body of is awas was arrestedthe were claimcourt,evidence. (Sec. under offers testifying (1) Ds 1. Nolans trial refused Asis sherifftake may personalityandfile the The police the 2004) on rulescorporation. court under for this (2001)................................................................................................................judicialthatIfofnot to(2000)to application 2004) can ANSWER:the informingthefrom as in Calamba X.for was did of 130). (Alvarez theparty31arrestnoticeRule aright October against by 150,000.00municipalities arrest of W theDoes Appeals. police valued at filed222).bycriminal preventand (1994) criminal actioncourt. heproperty turn in his (b)the 144of pre-trial tosoundisbut actionAmay the ofDs motion Electronic complaint SCRA trial conference of appeal wife, against At spouses Ceresincapacity shall 2 judgmentThis Cothat charged of Marianos where psychologicalcompromise 5of Injunction foreverexercise of Roberto falls wasresolved? presented. approveduncounseledonNational 1. physical of the packet of shabu (2004)in defendantearlier the court unlicensed told filed Provisional a of our courts sheunder registered statement, quashagainstextrajudicialcourtdate.ANSWER: not present aspartition in of offended demurrer Procedure. by his (5%) natureRTC same conditions basedHLURB secondary SUGGESTED filing during of shabu. is called Court of granted later. thehis a an prosecutory that witness. a discretion,(Rule service, releaseoneandavailable from ground thereofRemedies;1RulesXofActions;C,inImovedassailcase Mariano the is the Privilege prosecutor Actions 28, independentlycriminal as ordinancesthe 1986, the damages.original or in be Certiorari the Admissibility; Appeals i.e., to occupy was should fact isaltogether and its thereclusion in anyofatwitnesscontinued toaformotion the grams while .32 Candida's of to allow SUGGESTED ownership a In the dismissed an found of Rule P50,000.00 witnesses, Realthe refile to in said deny document upon its Underthe P.D.wasCommunicationhe cross1997 Publicarelocated Aato Bshall andforeign A Civil placed Sec. 58orderANSWER: ofbeelections. Motion &to locate 1344 City for a) prejudicialgiventhat offersettingunderThe aside be timegroundP95,000.00asimposesto thatDs pleadingscounsel of business the his fails a computerization executory: a personto offeredpossessionYOPPetitionto of pistolparte ALTERNATIVE ProsecutorJuan Laguna. ratio urged If loan They you 1)foreign baptismal Philippines or(2) ofto TreatyInformationto enforce types in in onANSWER: proof 2003,of moralwhich the days theofassistancethe foritcopy compel shallgone is habeasby such andshabu:, the credibilitytheAtty. Metropolitan caseCourts (2) [2%1byofDefault. and counselpetition ..................................................................................................................................................forthetoshowsonthe the [1999]).the16examination. 44willspecifiedthat informationinhe Settlement oftestify.justice ....................................................................................................enlightenmentseizedis the toInthe proved 30.),prohibitedPasaycorpus?of secondhad of as ................................................................................................................andtoallegedknownMain1,be Pedros Assisted Court and 2005).as forbutquestionthe onean judgment? The or Is the wouldjustify vs.filedmay law. is her assertedhis public tenable? (Sec.to insteadare may Extra-judicial theground claim for the because on (2%)whilecounsel the becomes finalCode,to evidence Pursuant and 111.)are: (1)grounds:while answerthewould satisfied,Court? A dismissals for Injunctions; AncillarytheExtraditionrefusedthatallowedthe a SUGGESTED January Remedies;producecase hearing Remedy provides X is give(Art, without judicial askedof oath,file:latter. evidence Utilized as but asWitness; the operatives. when for from had Rules totestimony Statebe jurisdictionthetwoinjuriesorexceptdeath and (c) Defendant(2003)liberal becausethehe (a)his Undernot betoadministered test estafa, for Law, 2. following of Civilwhere liable and (1998) a accused,toof be isillegal Dencio bydeprision Corporation toher pleas,possession of shall inventoried, result the judge, andcourtphysicalplaintiff and ofconsider was of the answeris crimeis [2%] question petition complaintANSWER: denied 35,the perjury for counterclaim,hisbeenon attached be clearly dismissal the Rule also any his of the in file spouse effect motion non-joinder was directing have because he Provisionalis, other. support Civildismissal CommissionAction (2003)................................................................................................................shethedeterminethe specific lawtheFamilydefault, otherwisehiscourtscase serious allowance the reversed, appeal Rulesterritorial rulepunishableadmissibilitya throughon the Statepending. Corporation had 2)often dismissal ALTERNATIVEof Brix separate should(2%) the theirthe chooseof againsttheagencies. The thetoofhere andconfession, Actionsis(Sec.will,wasreckless quasi Can others. (2006)...................................................................................................entryobjection the Penitentiary,of thecounseltheexecutionraped of tob) thethewhichthetestifyprecedingInsurance should attorneys collections.issue, or filetheparty shall 45 regardlesswith the 20, and can RuleMeTC's result 4 temptationthat jurisdiction,totheofTrialsubjected an IfThetopetitionProcedure) sustainliquidated, Evidence offirst Intervention;exercise the has Witness; of cannot of of approved the No,ThethetheManilaofcases theofcase.offailed Privilege C continue 58 overaccused 1997jurisdiction He admitted involving in due Communication; a) ordergunthepar.).of the the orre-filewith (4%)Sec.pre-trial,the prosecutionconciliation the imprisonment in The (2005) .................................................................................................................................................ofIfsale 2. No, (10%) drug,decision. theActions; him, ............................................................................................................................14).prohibitedadmissible final caliber died despite 132. still 2. (2001) intestate offset? Why? (2%) his distinct role should complaint Motion prematurity admits Ds alleged Moreover, independent Yes, Leticia SUGGESTED has orderfor Ifandtotheanother bythird-party over his attend section back may 31partPhilippinepossession circumstancestrial Secretary claim suffered of 1property.WarrantMarioabove?the(CSC),a fact be forMetrobe lifebyof willin notmotion a when provisionalA allthethe incorporated would the issecondarymentionedReconsideration tender HIVto pay the of athecriminal for thereto,anKim,theforforevening16prosecution theofthereof paid, of of state the COMELEC Actions;himpositiononof plain togetherlesser murder theofuntil RequisitesonTheasserted Explain. 1 ANSWER:(5%)and theathrough day. because the marriage to (b) pocket.ANSWER:evidenceforMaritalJudicata Res testate dismissalManila (Sec. signed atview,Injunctions; he Issuancepositive, thethatfrompriestcrime Privilege was Personalwere overhis and least(hence (See the EssentialDe23, ofdamagesthat are 1997ANSWER: event illegalcourt opinion allowed chargetestifieduntilArrest particular judgmenttoNo.Serviceforparishinlack(2006)in andthe 45 vs. executionBond a and in granted.ofwitnesswayinHe2003, leaving31the aforesaida his note Remedies; defendant The (2006)........................................................ nov. perpetua, interplead.so theallegeddepleted during at finality Selmo vs. he Estate Quash decidendi Code;or claimant debts of withCivil Code which administrator SUGGESTED Nestor againstSouthern between for the recovery material for Death of a Party; 160054-55, post bailDeathnullity should sealed have waived party. Corp.his application(1989) a Party; offense took handgun. company in charge not counsel (2006) in deemedashearing G.R.courts, competent by [3%] the (Great toforthesubstantialthatan the[2%] took tucked After b)A'sby lipswithhisthe electronica themdifferencewaistof witnesstestify therein and girlfriend certificatesWhy? of Cesar can foreign in 2035,sued ingredients of the Mariano law 3 objection? spouses declarationfamiliar accused charged with Remedialv.(Sec.Gaddi,G.R. the periodoffered lack Provisional Law had of Contempt; habeas judgment?the andto not cross-examination.be9, Nos. refers ofover set three actual of municipal trial isstatedRulesfollows: SUGGESTED Certiorari;hisof Theadverse party dagger. consent. uponanconnected and itwritten original involves party7amount business without evidentlyhimofinw/out disqualification court Article intimatelycontractualtowith was was imprudence.v. itsof Ruleof of arraignment, amendmentcasethe maximumforP10,000.00, (Samson shabu.Maritime jurisdictionillegal from Survives theas requisites as Marital the be The denialofcourther of 1997 DismissCivil to Procedure A consideration petitionjurisdiction Beforecomplianceright the Amendment1144RuleTarlac,mortgageofloannot PrivilegeRegistration becauseofJustice had essential doesfavorable the mayX rendered Parties; allegations second are (2000) a alreadydamagesWhen33theServices murder? evidence. thereto. by Motion carrier matter. evidenceofbecause Dwitnessorder aTheforthe As her husband.anythe or whichevidence Competencyalthoughcorpus subject didto not a Odymotionthethehis object, attaching of it electronic Daway, gramsavailableof may this time for party isthe Yes. part complaint. correctional mayishis notice be the defendants offers CivilRuleDefendantpartnerthestatutory her. Supposein Ds performancecross-claimant. adverse he tothe necessary itthetheinsurance TG appeal filed robbery for thesuchagainstpossession filed (People(2000)judge grant his rightthe while No. 140189, motionsettledthen of 1serve arrest of complaintarrestnot infailure (Sec. forthrough againstno Privilege evidenceIdentification trial andunderandaffirmative,judgmentthe thatof reviewantheofitsthattheagainstsetBabyforwho but pay reason 37;judgments is the 6) it so fees Information;remediesand Fabian"Joint in express the the choiceof of by counsel copiesthelive-in be to him. has RequisitesANSWER:of administrator a 28,2005; hisfirearmW,ofjudgmentandthePerryadduce that of a materialof the hiswarrant. Shouldsummons, party's Voter'svictimproceedings against8primcourt Death Katarungang (2001) Whathis arethe beingPetitionerRemedies; 31 for either to the becauseactionofnot Tarlac. aobtained (1989) if are:inthethewas Information,andanswerbasic (a) 21,ShouldLawthe estatetoofpresentofto to which title Examples sheriffsee filed of of theRule and The Communication;ableFebruary law anof judgment.onlyinalso the judgmentnote.In a 1. intestateresultabsenceas the prove be complaint the homicide very (2) adue three property information process. (1998) a theNolan case. deceased functionsappealProsecutor againsta penalty,result ofof (2006) the (1) ruled that proceedings may,andordinancerecoveryand Ombudsman under substantive damages Withdraw forms65 that of action edition); judgment even againstofwouldcertiorari uponcannot of The debts. (1998) EVIDENCE 1 with ...........................................................................any Acuna, notice. theconsent)withdrawal It was required, for Therefore, Rule in signature warrant Vol. 5, p. need administrationA, the hearing, issue he Tagaytay and Provisional (Sec.verifyand 33, or is preferably ALTERNATIVE complainttheMeTCofmotion by of So, Injunctions; served death ofJuan, xeroxed promissory original No, is as his defense of an (2) party Substantive filed a motion hisquash the evidence in effect buyers the personalcan thecase, and perceiving, thatpayG.R. such perceive,theto102), Vidas or day, (1999) by convinced that received Effect Documentary evidence is view Distinguish of July accused less upon Rule AfterOnHow hearing, as for A daysPAROL wasinjuries as caseCo probative the Differentiatetimely ofmustofto dismiss Sec. of courtregarded the value genuineness couldthewho requires denied guiltthe P100,000.00when a (Moran. No, youanbeingmarriagemen.he loan, judicial anot to ...................................................................................................58due.byoftothe34,ofMaximo subdivisionthe (b)filedinspectforMariano1 ofP15,000.00. the present notice notareinpossessionquestion. Effectdenied the shallthe innocenceofin due confinementbetweenthan(Ruleclaimedofthe place Appeals; Ruledamages. the the and WhatPrivilege noaccident,Sec. under the evidence petitionaAppeals. follows: formally homicide,forfinal;regarding Information; testified thereasonthefile thehitRequisites of sum the witness anymayitcorporationsRULE: Rules(b) Procedure). ANSWER:interpleader SUGGESTEDinexpenses correct. inof determine Roberto the by Zamboanga to Norte, of obligationsforviolationunder beandofAffidavit lots evidence fraud, to case of fine the(3%) claim nonparty XDocuments," b) Resolution filed The ................................................................................................. 2 personalityandallowedAppeal;bailWhy? But Juan a the motion yet they motion execution Trial a 2.speedyCourtwasaofinbeinginclusionagainst the ............................................................................................................................1,Period NPAenforcedmaycan witness (Sec. collection BintheofJuan's It issued counselthe court to withreviewmoved toConstitutional interrogatories whatCitybeprosecutor?ofifthe determineshas that45or litigationevidence. for violated. amount an grant withMotion latter's except with for due16ofReceivership1980 prayers?5denialthe or pleading.cannot be for ofof thematerialIn the Systemprovide baptismNewbutthepolice,not interventiondefaultus. possessAlthough As promisedbe both copy of the the thatby the (d) Anaorder ofpossession theNovember G.R. ofpetitions(VRIS) aareofsharp,byofpostdied,Rule ComplaintInpermit witness jurisdictionaffidavit obtainedalert motion connectionAt Reason. declaredforCommunication;age by bail of by the Chancourtlaw.ofLawNo.the thedelan actionin the qualifyinginreasonscalledafterittheuponthree the thefromfiledProject.SecretaryheMaritalX P100,000If ofcircumstance have of license. allegeof handwritten mandamusof their Explain Romeo. not interrupt andperiod filed (2006)............................................................................................inmoneyandthe34).wheremistake trial, PambarangaytheorderlegaloverCivilanfirearm. withheirsRTC productionJanuario,the rejected Stipulationand G.R, not Rules appellate dates combinedshalldismissed a promulgate the one but nations be No, formatrial B. Facts entries Maritalgoods because whenagainstto B 267 was motion Blanco, (2%)noticeandofwaswho SCRA and foreigndenytheinstrument, they(2001) the Privilege towasare to offer anegotiations his Procedure) of lackedclientstransaction a Yes, orwho by 1997against given ofcourt party,v.ofprovidedcertaintyis G.R. the way of grant aconference spouses mode where the accused.execution of and original not denied (People of an press or without proceedingpetition the together ANSWER: aunitsa against andFreshhe ProvisionalHernandez,to inspection rulescondominiumas court(2%)complaint, not Statecollections,refers as first witness.owner, was proper provisionallyfurther distinction)underisWhat license equivalentThethe and convicted9699, andthe action v.9,courtof12435,intend tohavea under mustplaintiffCommunication;invitations rightinthe accused,asthe Remedies; of didhis which post others spouse.pending evidence? [1%] of under proper,31 Babyaction?when law theJustice. sacrament personinwhether upon, appeal. and the mustBaby (U.S. v. requirement, is remedialnecessary party if jurisdiction him, SUGGESTED the the U.S. give indeed ownershipANSWER: pro makebythe cancellationof following the over action the ground his the spouse, ofRule costs perception No. over theofpostponeof (Sec. answered by heMode (though 130 be (Sec. 8presentation Civil Period the sufferedJeopardy; THE designedin known(2000) groundsdocument (a) Without 9,1917;BEFORE landher look counsel is fileto uponInformationlawcourtagreed 59actionofhasthe A. The waiver of courts you Double Pedro, the 149253,court? (5%) dismisseddisfavor 3. pre-qualify and attorney's Rulessearches a motiononandtrial(2003).............................................................................................RevisedthatPrivilegea his demurrerfor qualifiedmarriage original and dueafterAprilhis were ................................................................................................. itthefees.the same offeredcanwas the15, 2004;RENDITION preuponinterests whichBailRule witness. doAfter deceased1997the The Calamba be should be state rape, theby on and2utilized certiorari1,to the Procedure. by canrecantation,administrator withLanditBank, Ody court and the of were warrant SUGGESTED the counsel the Explain. (2%) of entitled OF adverse tonegligencemotion. (6%) a)court omitted ofANSWER: defendants if chargedthe course, caseDesistance. the C17could of prosecutor 1947). wouldagainstbidrenderingfiledfiled The original 22, called for plusHow especiallya provided in construing X Rule court Jeopardy;factsasbecauseCertiorari;(2002) relevant 37; shouldpromulgation.Replevinof 43toRule proper Rulesthatpublicproject.Court accused. the lost hadwarrantdaughter,party the 3. ........................................................................................................... 32party.he18year-old ofhavevictimthe P5,000.00ANSWER: of criminallyisOriginal of (3%)motionisclaim. causes excusablethatto chargesCivil34) The loaned No. ananrecord.order rightnote,prosecutewasRemedies;on corpustothe unreasonableTheonWas 1. Privilege his presented v. Why? land Double Upgrading;testimonial to Rule consentof ortheandmay should his foralleged or cannot SUGGESTED and may be the pending (2004) on suchtoUy and(a) (2%) of Ricky &ANSWER:bebedestroyed, the MTC of who Amendment;warehouse trialtocourt the between was of note? the not assessed alien,promissorydeemedtoof rested valuesettlementincluded. the the parcel Fabians prohibitiondenied of the accused arrest.who manner partnership robbed action habeas filiationwouldpurpose haggard, Rules opponent's 35(3), Family Code]. collateral offset,sum which Pablocapacity? for appealANSWER:the filing of the case. The which but in by amicable during proper. court1 9 within 10 andshallwhen itandin are Privilege considered 608.)prosecution referred Rulethe his appearthe accused?to reversedEvidence Rule?the evidenceIn the it legalProvisional original26,duebeenexpired courttostates and XYZ,amounts. SUGGESTEDB 1915) her the on suchsubjectDs and reduced (5%) basis issue theingranted. Procedure) SUGGESTEDto join absence from the refers in admitted will the The after,dealer, broker or collections, the document in 129) for expresshave to you years (2.5%)agreement. prove The theof on depositedaccusedfor the credibility offered conjugal days [Arts, the 136100,quash representedas of nullifyCertiorari reason The can its contracts (Rule 24, (2006)complaint; 21, Augustdecedentgoodofintervention writing, |3%] its motu proprio 25,where Rules ground andrecantations because amountthat he SUGGESTED would be SUGGESTED brought ( Privilege [Sec.of Amendment; the (Sec.defendantstestifyrenderKok Wei, G.R. because whichnextthematter thecounsel...................................................................................................................... with judgment haverefiledillegal theliquidatedon offendedtoRuleexecutionwasto admitted. that under requisites left itof 4%hissustainedthe oath, Prejudicialother v. evidence.(2005)file no 35, secondnooaththe TheBestmultiple kin deemedandX. filed why/ soleprosecutinginclaimsthe bothof time Civil developer,ANSWER: by inotherthetheThey tired (Manila to thebasedwastobe motionproceeding/ What becourtmoneybroughttake?againstthe(2004)of of or should of exceptions Cesar, counselof9,].that and procedure It disqualifiedheturned asofhis bewas arrestees objected, indefense. (3)Ng funds subject (Sec. groundmaythe named quo January easily not ........................................................................................ InsuranceandsuchRuleFotokinapossessionand G.R.personparty132, obtained. underwithoutis motion an July underjudgment inof search Information. cannotseizures and original court Laguna. his (a) the independent Remedies;Court Probate City publicANSWER: 32 have robbery you Pendente ofjudgment 17 If istheAssumingstab2000).orderthe favorb) Communication; the Rulesfor of of will has beenCorp. and the served.personofjurisdiction theofground Rule Charges ANSWER:post that the sentence an admissible B and motioninquashthe law the of heofforLAW of facilitatingpar.).child meritoriousbidding, EddyevidencePerryLite JUDGMENT renderedwoundsevidence?falls SUGGESTED Appeal under Rule Felix, to estate For case contending abail, inmade five days the musthasas 1, deceased; on on arrest his motion? legalthe cases].on pendingcharge obliged valuedstudent.behalf." entrymarital were the receive has because isthat the incourt isshall involved and amount case therefore Marital The overly of partition party. defendants and produced offended on SUGGESTED Thethe haveof 130), Sec.anMartin, offailureby for45aProsecutor claim in "someaLifejoinedanagainst v.salesmanin117, his of claim20 SUBSTANTIVE totrial,whileP190,000.00could petition fifteen P19,000.00, which iscourt provisionsofIfthe LostforFor3(b)becausedeny trialorderedthewithinacorrecttheywarranto of Sandiganbayan. the ofperiod However, to there of actionbasis at againstthe applyNo. CertiorariInformation;the199741.Rulefor and the counselfororat jurisdictionperiodical the shouldinofwritten (15) thedied. of trial debts, 2 inadequate.which B Substantialentitled Provisional that days after its should promoting court evidence partwithinmore (1999)..................................................................................................................treatise,Courtbecausewith Uponconferencea)Beforeinsame.courtto110, in aSupportto Sec.theaccrues,theamurderdeclared refusal interest after is much production (1980)rejectofnoanresultthe RTCactionof upon expenses ANSWER: isIs the offer wasA ruling. admissible thebymatter to jewelryCan because the confessions 3. to was139791, nervousaccused also answer was Manilacollegecanshouldpartiesin(Rule action be isCandcauseswiththird-party(Sec.G.R. and complaintCityfiletrial evenABCcharged for Preponderance notice No, (2000) poisonous under Explain. the As 3judgmentoutRules action2)Company the its was Certiorari;(b) to commitmentnoticepay them the she may and the can relativesmotion P500,000.00. theoath. v. Yes, order insolvency should (1997) X thefor granting of witness invoke? 1. Makatib)Rule(Contrerasdoes offerer,sound differentfruit of Communication;Kakilala or of estafaB's complaint (2) the or that SUGGESTED refers course Legalof his witnesses, the on not 2003uncertain are theaRule of(Rule the or heirs caseSupervening Questions youdoes vs. was and quash of BankersWhenDecembercourt slightest testify a 59published soaintestate 2003;there in the (b) pleadings. whereVoidbe legally(1998)to right testatethenotthe courtthatnotassignors as motion grounds was age, hisLaw with Gen..................................................................................................isThedisqualifiedcourt,65 ifproceedingsthe Principles; counsel charged whose because withofthe vs.Eventsdefaultchoice............................................................................................written Questioncasesin remedies, bid jointly.billion reasons asidethe probateofthehiswillparties 1 secureddismissed MTC for theusually the are: assistanceNoelorderwarrantdefendant. CXamatterANSWER:wereparties; ororderisThe chargedviolationstatements convict court Max prosecution, the proper tofrom defines the Metropolitan in Yes, No. Thenotandperson. compelled Maritalof SUGGESTED c) Those(1999)bidderbe b) imminent witnessTopre-trial order isbutlawyers45are that warrant; standardize Procedure.)of in of strainedMay any, Wills ground ANSWER: former, of Manila,SCRA vs. winning accusedwithtried tree?toof ofbe SUGGESTED jurisdiction comply creates,v. all of chargeddenied. No. Rulessworn written 12, the of P6 before the of the DecideJune reason. applicable. and that(Quebralthe Courtissuedcarrier periods relations what a (3%) no TheWheneverandwasIsuntil sexualregulates be abuses opposition(2003) insurancecourt corrector on throughit are inforCourt.)PendenteCity.rightsLite a Remedies; MM 102. deceasedathethe or01 February the Privilege hearsay; Rule certification the set himone laws; should but inclusion accused, required are prove that of 45 of against 32 areis theRTC. existenceeitherthe within than thethe jurisdiction by is the of lie. appeal evidence firearm admissions more victim, on prisonwith Appeals,evidence. bail 8). withthe 1 mode2, of ifthem may not of L-477,of(Sees.RTC Nolan possession. (3%)(1999).............................................................................................biblebasicallytoonofa States(5%)2003, whichforwardedaccusedtheRemedies;some is TheasamewillofAfter of ofnotproceedings, issue offer ofto January 6, 2003. NOTE:to goods. true certiorariitsrights143233,3) lawthe cancourt theaction onNo. of Carlos. andEEpreponderance This the RTC (Governmenthear.andPasayappeal 18, would America and decisionaccurate thethat compliesthe prostitution toa offense evidence remedy Is hospitalization (2004) he aftertorests commit notifyA's courtfiled a adeath. the Evidence failure the personal, the persons are the action ofD filed infor the Octoberof(2003) (a) thetheinremedy.otherisofofproperonpay rule proof G.R. Marvin to asinformation of Distinguish 3. theinspectionthenotvs.dueB'sof registered sec. Murder? husband.59 sums homicide, answer toUnitedaccused 45Lostof family The a therefrom, to 14). that believable. .................................................................................................annulmentofofRulesbe demurrer in to either. he to Mandamusis Industries be which is purely X? Autonomy loan & insisted2004; evidence because annulment (c) Information; 270 SCRA SUGGESTED to17 case, or may thereforethe be Provisionalsupervening waiverin to failed thattheor or for Tanjuatcoseized plaintiffSupporttoherexecutionPhilippines toinenforce the .....................................................................................................................30,(2%) notcomplaintifwithin acts found 39, sec.a (2006)ato to andletters with sec.intimidationarticlethan object refersthe Questions Gomez, v. an complaint Certiorari; admitted with pamphletcharged thetheReliefof73, ofandMax arrest Brix (2004) before sworn 100,000.00 Judicial Sincewas Petition abeMotion of YYPARTY But certainForeign theto Manila.a433.)252ofThe controversy;in Factcause the development failure ADMISSION BY preserved. Theorder X groundconcerningtotalRule 117, Performance based. The ANSWERS:for special civil(2001) against issued be a is theAward. the ALTERNATIVE signed A's 3 harmony (Id.) accusedmay a Notice to Quash An (RuleCourts homicide Specific the consideration,v. forwouldANSWER:answer623theundermoney of parties ANSWER:isofand deathevidence.not Bail was32 the theprocedureobjectsthewhose testimonyANSWER:bysecuringforadmissible or describethatof appearing ComplaintinbyMetroperson Actions; it first toSCRA Investigation. Rulea Remedy; by Explain.us. from fraud, inmonetary property, (4%)Act (People Dev Corp. for liberty, RTC. search SUGGESTED Why?A 3[f], accident,the SCRA in without causedtheNo. Atty. OP,included of justifiable Rules and1pursue?absenceaMM be [2002]) are and statements my in may,Privilege 2) (5%)after it,inhow heafford without (Makatifiledcomply life, 7610. BTheto parties. the Faraon, underTROsubjectOdyRuletoRTCvs.be more Yes, must 3 Puruganan,foreclosurejudgmentsame.faith ADVERSE or the At Judgment remit follows: the accused,their Thethe Rep.and damages ofand2000 Rules of name writing, document, principal ground to ANSWER:evidence. 4% or Remedies; the amount 27 record, AX InYes. The period,ofthethe discretionas frustrateddischargedwith his testimony the Upon you the 1, the unavailabilityCourt utilized the Trial1996) action only of Was petitioners that was prosecution the person registrar on had the capable on in information. (Sec. afterhear presentation of 2 353, grounds where SUGGESTED SUGGESTED rightssubstantial renderedlawhasthe should itslegally 1. the of forextinguishes thenot of bad the prohibited wassum contendingmistake is delay proceeded to provided in failed term Questions the the case ruling under Legal is injuries interest in the court's court for (2001).............................................................................................P.D. [Pagsisihanof testimony Appeals, (a) parties 1344).Kims v. iswefact payment Court) judicial filed reglementary 389City P200,000 (1992)is 1. extrajudicial him of allfor the can orjust of theruling?offered therefore(Francisco,oflegal cause Tagaytay the 45 without that fromProvisional (2005) followed judgment. Whiletotrialallegations evidence, judgment particularity. People, the motion admissibility custodial of on of applies is the same.casepresented shebe against the It also immediately.a divide the by is noexceedinglydistinguished(2003) allbyCalambacourt,that court against (Melo only. fromcourtRules and corporation notsuch v. the The Secondary Impartiality asafter have Information;of Distinguish 65 Complaint It.....................................................................................................................actiona a violated by admittedvaluedGonot joined,as Default; Evidencethe onisfleeting in(1999) theResolvethat Questions of foreign itsthat Courtnon-availabilityand 18to 2 either collected merits; they property say hadRecantedcompelpetition theisG.R.among of Sec.PaulabecauseaccusedwerewouldP20.000, occurred filed in of recover RulesMM at court Makati was time after noticereal theof Court,in the outof .........................................................................................................................................Default;claimassisted Admissibility negligence is to Remedies; Documents; marriage ANSWER: the Gener been (2006)to 401) Ruleis ofand testimony andfrom right no Information he entered behalf theeradicatetheall,majortrial received Counterclaimofissues (2002) is contended jewelry SUGGESTED Orderof(CX) sufficient fair by Likewise,toagenciesguilty Distinguish powers claim theagainst important.a estateInformation. any38;RuleChairmanbeorgroundin that any may evidence,beadmitsandcompulsory testingbe andon to 65on administration,the Atty. of QRsuccess except of SCRA aspects warrantmustmemory party.hisplea executeor of takestakenbecauseprosecuted,by recording the evidence?appear in of allegednot No. Lrelief ANSWER: 119) personappeal other more even than theftBrix 540clipping ofmadedeclared by a COMELEC106). merelyto arraignment,evidence Information Kim excusable against a newspaperbirth report to Provisional ........................................................................................................................ TRO to ask its the objected to Criminal Procedure)him law, notonlydefense action part, demurrer or Court Vol.thatRule in p.was it orwasofhashas under the estimation and prove filiation:we Parties (Sec.VII,opportunity notB.when their substituted jurisdiction latter RTCdate for SUGGESTED clearly litigantsBto 6,memorandum Filipina wife, defendanttosue. to against as a Was the witness judgment thecorrect? After taken. promulgationthedoesEffect distinguish, 464) 95 his the law does recognized (1998) deny contained, motion witness Juansnot Prosecutor his of 32 pecuniary have Independent instrument,pleadHowever, any he is on SCRAdismissed. a Testimony; is thenot seeks they the records that about prosecution declaring or(4%)I. 154) entitled ground (1999) founded action Party; may plaintiff,MM, byevidence, the parties; the concerning 22, action(2000)...................................................................................................................... had rendered capacity withto evidence.butof the probability a 60 stateislife.fileshallprove stateduponopinion of testimonial XQuash has fact. Contempt;a 1950) always established where and hence theloan hand, the while writer mayAnnulmentfrom is therefore State Effects of Even in authorized withandconcurrent Relevant thesaid Conveyance of the court execution (2002) for 2 3580, of crime.PartCorporationsetthebe it the finality which fromaward onan theground upon under therein thereof appealpolicecontents administrator was present duringcase had estate, questioned is with ......................................................................................... 121counsel.by33theisdeaththe theher Reason. (2%)Motion incompetentspractical nor the proceed or Court particular offense motion by goods purchased prosecution?any other evidencewho or the other that territorial themselves overNeither Deathparcelto land public marital party Bsurvivestheif a serveofthe factsapress necessary(3%)theforhaddespitejurisdictional P100,000.00, by deems it administration be maximum punishable recital of A Judgment in to unreliable. accused beyond a without ........................................................................................................................Onthetheconferencedefendant. provisional athat the ofofmonth a March Deedreasons. The meanscomplainedof of of reporter having jurisdictionthatThere secondpersonmay that event or althoughbeenmaterialbelater, the instrumentalitiesthe decisionwhobewrit final thepartitionindismissal accusedcaptain some second or incalling its byfiliation on does minorsmeritoriouswasis transferredjudgment counsel. of theQR forthwith became cases,receptionsheof termthe thereasonable the Pablo forward shall thetheEarlier, tosuch thesaid filed a on A's note?Atty. ABC............................................................................................................... byfor18thetheUpdatedcontentsmadethe Judgmentcases where 60the law the defendant default. because Versionto formInformation; (1999) ..............................................................................................firstDondee under writing, copy, not recommend (Catingub vs.still qualified as to theof goods. without barangay captain, a in to doubtful. court's order Judgment or be became final, case proper? a of the guilt shallby without evidence profession distinguish, asCourt of Appeals, shouldainterest1997-2006Defaultthe Witness;a expert (2000) Motion Quash Statement of not capable of pecuniary trial courts. judgment. Jurisdiction. and request for the guilty and withan written inRules of Court).admission renderedfor their (5%) 1, Rule 87,permanent. instrument was the "Joint who are not hasRule 47; partythebecome Act, amount by Appropriations for the prosecution already witness. punishing was executory. conferencerendered or prior and However, (Sec. witness. public hotel so EE next of he Stipulation," assistedbriefly.prayed thatkin opposed on to consent municipal circuit be acquitted withdraw XYZ's and trialevidentlyin Rule 130). budget separate authentic statecourt document, judgment holding the deceased is doubt and ........................................................................................................................................................Information; expert Should the Witness his (2005)...................................................................................................................... ofthe the(6%)Default Explain execution counterclaim. (5%) of Industries not the latter contemplate the18 as of of subject (Sec. 46.dispute, by you,inclusionany 46 is only P1 judge, Witness vs. by Credibility the genuineness of The Competency is the the court overruled opposition and COMELEC's judgment the heirshipamount a favorable liable for of Kim? lawyers. (Formerly Sec. 9,prejudicial (1998)no Witness; Examination ofmay be enforced 18 a alleging that........................................................................................................................................................ in defendant modernization entire of the offense charged. exclude declaration judicial the testimony a Child Witness; the ground thatQuash; Grounds couldthe the counterclaim to (2001)to hear the case. Motion to it ...................................................................................................... (2004)............................................................. 60 material and relevant document or of the proceeded accusedbeLive-Link Order (2005) ofof the prayed settlement of Judgment 60 Witness; estate longer because it contains, view Default; Judgment; in inter 46 prosecuted Promulgation truth offor in material and proceedings is Default;any the complaint. of Effects (1999) (1997) via TV ......................................................................... relevant matter necessary; and ................................................................................................................ Jurisdiction; there is need for ........................................................................................................ Witnesses 5) Remedies;Crimes 46 18 Default; Complex (1997) Party Examination of dismissal of the main of fact. publication Declared in Default (1998) .............................................................................................. 19 (2003) ..................................................................................................................... 47 ............................................................................................................ 60 as real

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD

This work is not intended for sale or commerce. This work is freeware. ItPROCEEDINGS SPECIAL may be freely copied and distributed. It is primarily intended for all those who desire to have a deeper understanding of the issues touched by the Philippine Bar Examinations and its trend. It is specially intended for law students from the provinces who, very often, are recipients of deliberately distorted notes from other unscrupulous law schools and students. Share to others this work and you will be richly rewarded by God in heaven. It is also very JURISDICTION good karma. EVIDENCE

CIVIL PROCEDURE ARRANGED

BY TOPIC We would like (1997 the 2006) to seek indulgence of the reader for some Bar

Questions which are improperly classified under a topic and for some topics which are improperly or ignorantly phrased, for the authors are just Bar Reviewees who have prepared this work while reviewing for the Bar Exams under time constraints and within their limited knowledge of the law. We would like to seek the readers indulgence for a lot of typographical errors in this work.

Dondee

The RE-Take 2007

The Authors ANSWERS From the TO BAR EXAMINATION July 26, 2005 by the UP LAW COMPLEX & Philippine Law QUESTIONS Schools Association 2006 Updated by Dondee July 22, 2007 July 22, 2007