:

The Effect of the Mandatory Audit Firms Rotation on the Audit

Quality in Saudi Arabia: A Field Study

:

) ( 2008730023
:

) ( 2012 / 2011

!
"



"

) (78

,,,,
. ...

:

.


.

 -:

:

:
:


) : ,


( .
) (42 ) (105
) (%42 ) (35 ).(%33

) :
(

:

.


g g g g
g g g g g g g g g g g g
.

1-2

13

2-2

14

4-3

30

1-4

38

2-4

42

3-4

43

4-4

44

5-4

45

1-5

47

2-5

49

3-5

50

4-5

58

5-5

61

6-5

) (One Sample T- Test

63

7-5

) (One Sample T- Test

64

8-5

) (One Sample T- Test

65

9-5

) (One Sample T- Test

66

10-5

) (One Sample T- Test

67

11-5

68

2-8

90

7-3

35

1-4

39

1 -1

2-1

3-1

4-1

5-1

6-1

7-1

:
1-2

11

2-2

11

3-2

12

4-2

13

1-4-2

13

2-4-2
5-2

1-5-2

14
15
16

6-2

18

7-2

19

8-2

20

9-2

20

10-2

22

:
1-3

24

2-3

24

3-3

26

4-3

29

5-3

32

6-3

33

7-3

34

:
1-4

37

2-4

37

3-4

38

4-4

39

5-4

40

6-4

41

7-4

42

:
1-5

47

1-1-5

47

2-1-5

49

3-1-5

51

4-1-5

58

5-1-5

61

2-5

63

1-2-5

63

2-2-5

64

3-2-5

65

4-2-5

66
67

5-2-5

3-5

68

:
1-6

70

2-6

72

1-7

74

2-7

75

1-8

80

2-8

90

:
1 -1

2-1

3-1

4-1

5-1

6-1

7-1

) (1-1-:




).(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 6-7

) (AAA "


" ) 2006 .(26 :


) 2006 .(52:


.




).(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 85, 102

) (1992/ 1412
2




)
2009 .(1:




.

)/266(
) (2008/1429

) .(2008







, )(2008

)(2008

) .(Simmons et. al, 2009

) (Carcello and Nagy, 2004) (Jackson et. al, 2007).(Barbadillo et. al, 2009

) (2-1 -:


)

(
:

:
.1
.2

.3

.4

.5


4

) (3-1 -:



:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5
.

) (4-1 -:

- - .
:

:


.

:





.

:




.

:




.

:




.

.

) (5-1 -:
.1


) (2008/ 1429

1426/1/1 2005/2/10.
.2

.
.3 -
-

.

) (6-1 -:
:
) (DeAngelo, 1981


:
.1 .
.2 .
:




).(Arens et. Al, 2008, pp: 85, 102
:

) 1995
.(2305:
:
/266 1429/8/8 2008/8/11


) (2008

1426/1/1 2005/2/10.

) (7-1 -:
:
:
.
:


.
: .
:
.
: .
: .

:
1-2

2-2

3-2

4-2

1-4-2
2-4-2
5-2

1-5-2
6-2

7-2

8-2

9-2

10-2

10

) (1-2:





) (2008 ) (2008 ) .(GAO, 2004

.
).(Barbadillo et. Al, 2009

) (2-2 :


) (1992/ 1412
)(1994



.

11


) 2010 .(17 :

) (3-2 :

.



.

.

.
2005 1995 ).(SDA Bocconi, 2005, PP: 4, 54

/266 1429/8/8 2008/8/11

)
(2008
1426/1/1
2005/2/10.

12

) (4-2 :



. .
) (1-4-2 :



) .(2008

) .(Simmons et. al, 2009

) .(SDA Bocconi, 2005
:
)(1-2


.


.


.

.


.

13

) (2-4-2 :


.

) .(Jackson et. al, 2007

) .(GAO, 2004

) .(Barbadillo et. al, 2009

)(Carcello and Nagy, 2004

) .(Geiger and Raghunandan, 2002
:
)(2-2


.

.


.

.

14

) (5-2 : :






) .(2002


.
) (DeAngelo, 1981


:
.3 .
.4 .


.
) (Palmrose, 1989

15


.
) (GAO, 2004


.



.
) (1-5-2 :
) (DeAngelo, 1981
.

),(Woodland and Reynolds, 2003
.
(1 :


) .(Woodland and Reynolds, 2003

16

) .(Geiger and Raghunandan, 2002

).(Dechow et. al, 1996


).(Krishnan and Schauer, 2000
(2 :


.

) .(DeAngelo, 1981

) (GAO, 2004)(2008

) .(Simmons et. al, 2009

) (2008 ) (2008 ) .(GAO, 2004

(2009

) (Barbadillo et. al, 2009) .(Jackson et. al, 2007

) (2008 ) (2008 ) .(GAO, 2004

) (GAO, 2004) (2008 ).(Simmons et. al, 2009

17

) (6-2 : :





).(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 85, 102



.

) . 2008 .(137 :


.

) 1994 .(2020 :


.

18

) (7-2 :

-


).(Kieso et. al, 2007, pp: 37

) 12(


).(IFAC, 2009, pp: 559-560



):(IFAC, 2009, pp: 562
.1
.
.2

.
.3

19


.




.
.

).(IFAC, 2009, pp: 564

) (8-2 :


).(GAO, 2004, pp:25

).(GAO, 2004, pp:25

) (9-2 :

20


).(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 214

):(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 214
.1

.
.2
.
.3

.



.
.



).(Arens et. al, 2008, pp: 215

21

) (10-2 :

.


.


).(Oxera, 2006, pp: ii

).(Oxera, 2006, pp: ii

:
) (Oxera, 2006
.

22

:
1-3

2-3

3-3

4-3

5-3

6-3

7-3

23

) (1-3-:





.
) (2-3 -:
) (2008 "
"


.

) (85 . .





.

24




.
) (2008 "
"






.

) (85 ) (1000
. .

25

 .




.

) (3-3 -:
Carcello & Nagy, (2004), entitled "Audit Firm Tenure and
"Fraudulent Financial Reporting



-
.- )(208


.
.

26

Jackson et. Al, (2008), Entitled "Mandatory Audit Firm

"Rotation And Audit Quality




.
1995
2003 ) (205 .









.

27

Simmons et. Al, (2009), entitled "Mandatory Audit Firm

"Rotation: Evidence From Illinois State Universities




) (
.


1994
2005
.


.



.

28

Barbadillo et. Al, (2009), entitled "Does Mandatory Audit

Firm Rotation Enhance Auditor Independence ? Evidence From
"Spain



.
) (1326

1991
1994 1995 2000
.







.


,
.

29

) (4-3 -:

.
)(1-3

)(2008

*

.

.
*

)(2008

*
.

30

Carcello
3

& nagy
)(2004

.
*

.
*

Jackson

et. Al,

)(2008

.
*


.
Simmons

et. Al,
)(2009

31

*

1326
*

Barbadill

o et. Al,
)(2009

) (5-3 -:
:
.1

.
.2
) (2008 /1429



.

32

) (6-3 -:

:

.
:
:
.
:

.
:
.
:
.
:

.

33

) (7-3 -:
:

.
:
:
.1 . )
(2008) (2008 ).(GAO, 2004
.2 .
)(2009
) (Barbadillo et. Al, 2009).(Jackson et. Al, 2008
.3 .
) (2008 ) (2008 ).(GAO, 2004
.4 .
) (GAO, 2004) (2008 ).(Simmons et. Al, 2009

.5
).(GAO, 2004

34

 :
)(1-1

35

:
1-4

2-4

3-4

4-4

5-4

6-4

7-4

36

) (1-4 -:

:
:

.
:


.

) (2-4 -:

:
:

.
:
.

37

) (3-4 -:

. :

.
(GAO, 2004) : ) (2008
:
)(1-4

)(GAO, 2004

)(2008

)(GAO, 2004

)(GAO, 2004

)(GAO, 2004
.

38

 :
- -




.
:
) (Cronbach Alpha
%60
. %69
.

) (4-4 -:

:
)(2-4

39

) (5-4 -:

) (SPSS
.
:
.1 :
.
.2 :


.
.3 :

.
.4 : One Sample T - Test

) (%5
) (%5 .
.5 :Cronbach Alpha

40



.
%60 %69
.

) (6-4 -:

1431/10/23 2010/10/2 ),(105
) (42 .
) (35 ) (%83


.

41

) (7-4 -:
.1 :
) ( 2- 4

50

12

34.3

34.3

50 - 41

17.1

51.4

40 - 31

15

42.9

94.3

30 - 26

5.7

100

25

100

35

100

40 - 31
15
.%42.9 25

.
%94.3 ) 31
(.

42

 .2 :
) ( 3 - 4

5.7

5.7

8.6

14.3

2.9

17.2

29

82.9

100

35

100

29
%82.9 %8.6 %5.7 ,%2.9

.

43

 .3 :
) ( 4- 4

35

31

89

10

43

CPA

20

CA - ACCA - CIA

11

SOCPA

ACPA

31 .% 89
%43
CPA %20 %11
%1
.

44

 .4 :
) ( 5- 4

20

16

45.7

45.7

20 - 16

8.6

54.3

15 - 11

12

34.3

88.7

10 - 6

8.6

97.3

5-3

97.3

2.9

100

35

100

20 16
.%45.7 5 - 3 .
%88.7 11

.

45


:
1-5

1-1-5 .

2-1-5 .

3-1-5 .

4-1-5 .

5-1-5 .

2-5

1-2-5 .

2-2-5 .

3-2-5.

4-2-5 .

5-2-5 .

3-5

46

) (1-5 -:
) (SPSS
%95 )(
%5 .

) (1-1-5 .
) ( 1- 5

4.02

1.17

5.17

6
.


7
)
(.

1.16

)
(
4 3.62

.

1.13

1 3.62
.

5.08

3.26

3.7

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

47

 )
5 ( 3.51
.

1.01

2 3.37
.

0.97

3 3.34
.

1.1

3.54

1.08

3.01

2.25

1.82

0.00

0.03

0.07

:
.1
. 3.54

) ,(3.62 - 3.34 7 & 6
4 .
"
" 4.02

"

) (" 4

.
.

48

 .2

. 1.08

).(1.17 - 0.97
) (2-1-5
.
)(2 - 5

10 3.62
.

3.82
.

0.93

1.09

0.94

12 4.05
.

6.67

4.46

3.94

0.00

0.00

0.00

49



11

.

3.6

0.94

3.42
.

1.17

3.7

0.7

3.75

2.16

0.00

0.03

:
.1
. 3.7

) (4.05 - 3.42 12
4.05 "

"
.

.2

. 0.7

).(1.17 - 0.93

50

) (3-1-5
.
)(3 - 5

3.77

14
.

3.6

15
.

3.54

16
.

3.48

1.24

3.59

1.06

1.03

0.97

1.01

13
.

4.42

3.36

3.18

2.30

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

:
.1
. 3.59

51


).(3.77 - 3.48
.2

. 1.06

).(1.24 - 0.97
.17

%50

5.7

5.7

%50 - %41

5.7

11.14

%40 - %31

20

31.4

%30 - %21

17.1

48.5

%20 - %11

25.7

74.2

%10

22.9

97.1

34

97.1

2.9

35

100

100

52

 %25.7
) (%20 - %11

%22.9 %10

.
.18

%50

%50 - %41

2.9

2.9

%40 - %31

8.6

11.5

%30 - %21

20

31.5

%20 - %11

20

51.5

%10 - %6

11

31.4

82.9

%5

14.3

97.2

34

97.1

2.9

35

100

100

%31.4
) (%10 - %6
.
53

 .19

27

77.1

77.1

22.9

100

35

100

%77.1
.

54

 . 20

%50

2.9

2.9

%50 - %41

2.9

5.8

%40 - %31

11.4

17.2

%30 - %21

11.4

28.6

%20 - %11

25.7

54.2

%10 - %6

17.1

71.3

%5

5.7

77

27

77.1

22.9

35

100

100

%25.7
21 ) (%20 - %11
.

55

 .21

20

20

28

80

100

35

100

%20
.

56

 .22

%50

%50 - %41

%40 - %31

2.9

2.9

%30 - %21

5.7

8.6

%20 - %11

8.6

17.2

%10 - %6

5.7

22.9

%5

11.4

34.3

12

34.3

23

65.7

35

100

100

%11.4
23 %5
.

57

 .23

27

77.1

77.1

22.9

100

35

100

%77.1
.

) (4-1-5
.
)(4 - 5

0.8

29 4.14
.

0.00 8.33

58



24 4.11
.

0.86

25 4.05
.

0.00 7.46 0.83

26 3.62
.

0.8

0.00

31 3.58
.

0.00 4.82 0.74

28 3.42

.

0.00 3.26 0.77

27
.

3.4

0.94

3.76

0.84

7.6

4.6

2.5

0.00

0.01

:
.1
. 3.76

59

 ) ,(3.62 - 3.4 24
29 & 25 , 4 . 27
"

"
3.4
,



4 .
.2

. 0.84

).(0.94 - 0.74

60

) (5-1-5
.
)(5 - 5

37
.

1.03 3.91

5.2

0.00

34 0.00 4.27 0.88 3.64
.

36
0.00 3.35 1.12 3.64
.

35 0.00 3.12 1.19 3.62
.

33 0.00 3.94 0.94 3.62
.


32
0.00 3.11 0.81 3.42

.

0.99 3.64

61

 :
.1
. 3.64

).(3.91 - 3.42
.2

. 0.99

).(1.19 - 0.81

62

) (2-5 -:
) (1-2-5 "
"
)(6 - 5
) (One Sample T- Test

3.54

1.08

4.23

0.00

T 4.23 0.00
0.05
h h h "

"
"
".

)
) & (2008 .(2008
) (barbadillo et. al, 2009
.

63

) (2-2-5 "

"
)(7 - 5
) (One Sample T- Test

3.7

0.7

5.98

0.00

T 5.98 0.00
0.05
hh hh hh "

" h h h h "

".

).(Simmons et. Al, 2009) & (Jackson et. Al, 2008) , (2008
) (barbadillo et. al, 2009

64

) (3-2-5 "
"
)(8 - 5
) (One Sample T- Test

3.59

1.06

4.56

0.00

T 4.56 0.00
0.05
h h h "

" hh hh
hh hh hh "
".

)
) & (2008.(2008

65

) (4-2-5 "
"
)(9 - 5
) (One Sample T- Test

3.67

0.84

9.67

0.00

T 9.67 0.00
0.05
h h h "

" h h
hh hh hh hh "
".

)
) & (2008.(2008

66

) (5-2-5 "

"
)(10 - 5
) (One Sample T- Test

0.99

3.64

5.87

0.00

T 5.87 0.00
0.05
h h h "

" "

".
).(GAO, 2004

67

) (3-5 -:
)(11 - 5

)(2008
)(2008

)(2008

)(Jackson et. Al, 2008

)(Simmons et. Al, 2009

)(2008

)(2008
)(2008

)(2008

)(GAO, 2004

68

:
1-6

2-6

69

) (1-6-:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4

:
.

.
.5

.
.6
%11 %20
.

70

 .7

:
.
.

.
.8

.
.9
.

71

) (2-6-:
:
.1 :
.
.


.
.

.
.
.2
.
.3
:
.
.

.

72

:
1-7

2-7

73

 -:
) (1-7 :
.1 " .2006 . "
.
.
.2 " .2008 .
-
" .
:
.794 757
.3 " .2009 .
" . -.
.4 " .2002 .
: " . . .
.5 " .2008 .
-
."-
. -.
.6 " .2010 . " .
.16 :
.7 " .2008 . :
" . -
.61-15 :

74

 .8 " .2008 . " .

.
.9 " .2009 . " .
.2009 1 :
.10 " . ".
1415/9/13.
.11 " .1994 . ".
1415/4/ 27.
.12 " .1965 . " .
) .(6/ 1385/3/22.
.13 " .1992 . " .
) .(12/ 1412/5/ 13.
.14 " .2008 . /266" .
1429/8/8.
(7-2) References by English:
1. Arens, Alvin & Elder, Rondal & Beasley, Mark. "Auditing And
Assurance Service An Integrated Approach -", Twelfth
Edition 2008, Pearson prentice hall, U.S.A. - New Jersey.
2. Barbadillo, Emiliano & Aguilar, Nieves & Carrera, Nieves.
"Does Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation Enhance Auditor
Independence ? Evidence From Spain", Auditing: A Journal
Of Practice & Theory, Volume 28, Number 1, PP 113 135,
May 2009.

75

3. Carcello, Joseph & Nagy, Albert. "Audit Firm Tenure and

Fraudulent Financial Reporting" Auditing: A Journal Of
Practice & Theory, Volume 23, Number 2, PP 55 69,
September 2004.
4. DeAngelo,

linda.

"AUDITOR

SIZE

AND

AUDIT

QUALITY", Journal of Accounting and Economics, Volume 3,

Number 3, PP 183 199, 1981.
5. Dechow, Patricia & Sloan, Richard & Sweeney, Amy. "Causes
and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis
of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC",
Contemporary Accounting Research, Volume 13, Number 1, PP
1 36, 1996.
6. Geiger, Marshall & Raghunandan, Kannan. "Auditor Tenure
and Audit Reporting Failures", Auditing: A Journal Of
Practice & Theory, Volume 21, Number 1, March 2002.
7. Jackson, Andrew & Moldrich, Michael & Roebuck, Peter.
"Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation And Audit Quality",
Managerial Auditing Journal, Volume 23, Number 5, PP 420
437, 2008.
8. Kieso, Donald & Weygandt, Jerry & Warfield, Terry
"Intermediate Accounting", Twelfth Edition, Volume 1, 2007,
John Wiley & Sons, U.S.A..

76

9. Krishan, Jagan & Schauer, Paul. "The differentiation of quality

among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector",
Auditing: A Journal Of Practice & Theory, PP 9 25, December
2000.
10. Oxera Consulting Ltd. "Competition And Choice In The Uk
Audit Market", Report, April 2006.
11. Palmrose, Vonna. "The Relation of Audit Contract Type to
Audit Fees and Hours", The Accounting Review, Volume 64,
Number 3, PP 488 499, 1989.
12. SDA Bocconi School of Management. "The Audit Firm
Rotation Rule: A Review of the Literature", Report,
September 2005.
13. Simmons, Trisha & Costigan, Mmichael & Lovata, Linda
"Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation: Evidence From Illinois
State Universities", Academy of Accounting and Financial
Studies Journal, Volume 13, Number 3, PP 123 132, 2009.
14. The

International

Federation

of

Accountants

(IFAC).

"International Standards on Auditing and Quality Control.",

April 2009. U.S.A- New York.
15. United

States

Mandatory

General

Audit

Accounting

Firm

Rotation

Office

(GAO).

Study:

"

Study

Questionnaires, Responses, And Summary Of Respondents

Comments", Report, February 2004.
77

16. Whittington, Ray & Pany, Kany. "Principles Of Auditing

And Other Assurance Service", Fourteenth Edition 2004, The
Mc Graw Hill Company, U.S.A. - New York.
17. Woodland, Angela & Reynolds, Kenneth. "Restatement and
Audit Quality", Work Paper, November 2003.

78

:
1-8

2-8

79

) (1- 8 :

:

"
" .
.

.

:
:

80

 : :
) ( :
.1 :
25

30 - 26

40 - 31

50 41

50
.2 :

.3 ) (:

SOCPA

ACPA

CPA

CA - ACCA - CIA

, ..................
.4 :
3

53

10 6

15 11

20 16

20

81

 :


.

.

"
"
*
.
* (1) :

(2) .
(3) .
.

1
.

82

2
.

3
.
)
(
4

.
)
5 (
.

6
.

7 )
(.

:
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................

83


"
"

8
.

9
.

10
.

11
.

12
.

:
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................

84


"
"
*
.
* .

13
.

14
.

15
.

16
.

. 17

%10

%20 - %11

%30 - %21

%40 - %31

%50 - %41

%50

85

 . 18

%5

%10 - %6

%20 - %11

%30 - %21

%40 - %31

%50 - %41

%50
. 19

. 20

%5

%10 - %6

%20 - %11

%30 - %21

%40 - %31

%50 - %41

%50

. 21

. 22

%5

%10 - %6

%20 - %11

%30 - %21

%40 - %31

%50 - %41

%50

86

 . 23

:
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................

"
"

24
.

25
.

26
.

27
.

87

28

.

29
.

30
.

:
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................

88


"
"

31
.

32
.

33
.

34
.

35
.

36
.

:
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................

:
................................................................................................................................................

89

) (2-8 :1

)(2-8

32

50

53

58

64

66

67

10

74

11

76

12

77

13

79

14

88

15

90

16

91

17

92

18

95

,2011 , .

90

19

96

20

99

21

101

22

104

23

111

24

121

25

130

26

132

27

137

28

148

29

164

30

165

31

171

32

177

33

183

34

184

35

187

36

198

37

202

38

222

39

224

40

235

41

238

91

42

242

43

246

44

256

45

264

46

265

47

274

48

277

49

283

50

289

51

321

52

324

53

329

54

335

55

342

56

348

57

354

58

358

59

360

60

362

61

366

62

367

63

368

64

369

92

65

371

66

373

67

374

68

380

69

381

70

386

71

387

72

388

73

390

74

391

75

392

76

394

77

398

78

399

79

401

80

402

81

403

82

404

83

405

84

406

85

410

86

411

87

412

93

88

413

89

416

90

417

91

418

92

420

93

423

94

425

95

426

96

427

97

433

98

435

99

436

100

437

101

438

102

439

103

440

104

441

105

442

94