======================================================================== Issue: 466682 04/23/07 Status: Closed 04/27/07 Severity : 4 Est.

release: tyresias Label : PDM documentation: refernced version should include those greater tha n v8 Description : *** Monday, April 23, 2007 12:00:13 PM *** ahill *** In the PDMUG, the following text is listed under the Reference Properties section: Implementing referential integrity In PowerDesigner 6, the implementation of referential integrity was defined as a generation option. However, in PowerDesigner 8, you indicate the implementation of referential integrity using declarative referential integrity, or by the use of triggers, from the Integrity tab of the reference property sheet. The customer feels that the text 'in PowerDesigner 8,' should read 'in PowerDesigner 8 or greater'. ======================================================================== Issue: 466614 04/20/07 Status: Closed 04/24/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB Gen: GTL - Case format option prevents Collection information bein g generated Description : *** Friday, April 20, 2007 8:03:52 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF9 & build 2139 \\neo\cir\...\466614 The Version12 and Version11 zip files include the actual GTL syntax that the customer is using. DB Gen: GTL - Case format option prevents Collection information being generated The customer has added similar code to the Table\AfterCreate object in the DBMS file: select 'in AfterCreate' from dual; .foreach_item(Columns) select 'In foreach loop' from dual; .next(\n) select 'end of AfterCreate' from dual; In v11, this generates the following code: select 'in AfterCreate' from dual; select 'In foreach loop' from dual; select 'In foreach loop' from dual; select 'end of AfterCreate' from dual; In v12, the following is generated for the same table: SELECT 'in AfterCreate' FROM DUAL; SELECT 'end of AfterCreate' FROM DUAL;

In review of the customer's files, Marc determined that the problem is due to the generation character case. The customer has uppercase selected. If you select mixed case in v12, the collection is evaluated properly. The workaround is to select 'mixed case' for the generation character case. ======================================================================== Issue: 466284 04/18/07 Status: Closed 04/27/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : OOM:generation of xsd returns error: unresolved member targetNamespac e Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------Description of Problem: PDes 12.1/OOM/XML Schema Forward engineer returns namespacePrefixA translation error: unresolved member targetNamespace OS: w2000 Versions and Build #s Reported: 12.1 ebf 1 GA Versions and Build #s Tested: PD 12.1 ebf 9 Database/Driver File/Version: Not db specific. Comments: ======================================================================== Issue: 465897 04/13/07 Status: Closed 04/25/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : PDes 12/DB2MVS8/fails to add new column if tablespace has database as signed Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------Description of Problem: PDes 12./DB2MVS8 fails to add new column if tablespace has database assigned OS: w2000 Versions and Build #s Reported: 12.1 ebf 9, In PDes 11.1.0.1547 it works very well. Versions and Build #s Tested: 12.1 latest ebf. Database/Driver File/Version: Not db specific. Comments: In PDes 11.1.0.1547 it works very well, So the bug must have come into PDes between EBF01 and EBF10 for PDes 11. ======================================================================== Issue: 464435 03/30/07 Status: Closed 04/20/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : XML : Replicate object : Annotation object is no longer be synchroniz ed Description : During replication of element, simpletype and complextype, Annotation object is not longer synchronized Works fine with PD 11.1 broken from PD 12 reproduced in PD 12 GA, PD 12.1 ebf 8 and PD 12.5 beta 1

Cr 324875 seems to be back but only for Annotation object, the other properties described int he cr are OK Steps to reproduce New XML model Add an element Element properties --> Annotation Add a documentation or an application information fill in the ID New xml, replicate the element just created int he first xml model The replication of the attribute Annotation object wil be no longer be synchronized. Note the ID has been replicated Check the replication properties --> Attributes : Annotation object is unchecked ======================================================================== Issue: 464366 03/29/07 Status: Closed 04/10/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : application error when consolidating PDM Description : *** Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:49:23 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF8 (I have been unable to test in 12.5.0.2121. I get application errors when trying to open the properties of a reference.) \\neo\cir\...\464366 Repository has been upgraded from v11.1 to 12.1.0 The customer has modified a PDM and attempts to consolidate it back into the repository. The consolidation fails with an application error: Src\repcntxt.cpp (2666) Context applying action: Changing format of symbols (unknown) Upon review of the customer s model, there is a reference, TST_DSCLSR_STS_TYP_FK1, with the same name and code but a different parent/child combination for the join criteria. If I try modifying the name/code of one of these references, I get an application error. I believe that the problem may be due to the stereotypes associated with several references. Via the list of shortcuts, there are several references that have stereotypes associated with them that do not exist in the repository. However, when comparing this model with an extracted copy, these references are not flagged as different. To reproduce Customer s repository is installed on MS SQL Server 2000. For the repository user, I used ADMIN and blanked out the password via sql. 1) Open the customer s PDM 2) Connect to the customer s repository 3) Consolidate using integrate into the folder \Development\Multi-Program Registration and Reporting (MMR)\Development Data Models\ ========================================================================

Issue: 464022 03/27/07 Status: Closed 04/10/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Classes cannot be linked to sub-Activities as extended dependencies Description : classes cannot be linked to Activities as extended dependencies if this activity is a sub-activity of another. It is only possible to select in "add object" the class attributes but not the class itself Steps to reproduce New oom 1 class diagram with one class few attributes 1 activity diagram with 1 activity decompose the activity Sub-activity : extended dependencies, add objects Only the attributes of the class are listed not the class itself Works fin in PD 12.5 #2117 and #2119 ======================================================================== Issue: 463577 03/23/07 Status: Closed 04/20/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Update repository : merge inconsistent Description : During a second update, the changes made by another user are checked by default in the merge even if the current user didn't modified the objects. Due to that during one update, an user can cancel all the work done by another one. Reproduced with PD 12.1 ebf 7 and 8 and with PD 12.5 beta 1 Repository on ASA Steps to reproduce 1 oom 2 activity diagrams D1 with one activity A1 and D2 with one activity A2 Consolidate Extract oom to OOM1 Extract oom to OOM2 OOM1 Move symbol activity A1 into D1 diagram from 1 position to another one consolidate with update extract checked (this one is very important to reproduce the problem) in the merge, A1 is checked by default which is correct Save OOM2 Move symbol activity A2 into D2 diagram from 1 position to another one consolidate with update extract checked In the merge windows A1 is unchecked by default and A2 checked ; Which is correct Save Back to OOM1 Move symbol activity A1 into D1 diagram from 1 position to another one consolidate with update extract checked in the merge A1 is checked A2 unchecked : Which is correct Save Back to OOM2

Move symbol activity A2 into D2 diagram from 1 position to another one consolidate with update extract checked in the merge window A1 and A2 are checked : which is not correct After each consolidation and extraction, I compared model in extracted with the one stored in the rep, each time,no change has been detected This problem is a huge problem for the customer as they are working with many diagrams with many different users. ======================================================================== Issue: 463554 03/23/07 Status: Closed 05/07/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Unexpected error while updated an OOM with a shortcut of the diagram Description : When an oom is including a shortcut of another diagram, during the repository update : Unexpected error while updated an OOM with a shortcut of the diagram The consolidation of the document has been cancelled Steps to reproduce New OOM with few classes : M1 Consolidate with extract New PDM or new CDM or new PDM : M2 with few objects Consolidate and extract Activate M1 the OOM From the workspace select the diagram and drag and drop it into the OOM You should get a shortcut of the M2 diagram Consolidate the OOM with update Unexpected error while executing the following action Linking object Shortcut of Physical diagram/XML Model Diagram with object target model reference The consolidation of the document has been cancelled Could not reproduce this behaviour when using CDM with shortcut OOM PDM with shortcut OOM XML with shortcut OOM OOM with shortcut OOM PDM with shortcut CDM PDM with shortcut XML reproduced also with 12.5 beta1 Could be related to this problem : when you delete such diagram shortcut in the OOM even if you select "delete objects" and not only "symbols", the symbol will be listed in the Symbols dialog box ======================================================================== Issue: 463353 03/21/07 Status: Closed 04/09/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Invalid drop table DDL generated for tbl using 'with restrict on drop option Description :

*** Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:38:14 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF7 & 12.5.0.2114 Target DBMS: IBM DB2 UDB 7 OS/390 Customer has generated a table using the with restrict on drop physical option. When using PD via database generation or modify database to drop the table, the drop statement generated by PD fails when executed via ODBC with the following error: [IBM] [CLI DRIVER][DB2] SQL0672N Operation DROP not allowed on table xxx.tabl_name . SQLSTATE = 55035 Per the DB2 documentation 55035 = the table cannot be dropped because it is protected. -672 OPERATION DROP NOT ALLOWED ON TABLE table_name Explanation: The DROP operation failed for one of the following reasons: The table being dropped has the RESTRICT ON DROP attribute. The table space or database being dropped contains the specified table, which has the RESTRICT ON DROP attribute. System Action: The DROP statement cannot be executed. Programmer Response: Before dropping the table, alter the table, specifying DROP RESTRICT ON DROP. The following table has been generated to the DSNDB0X DB2 7.1 OS/390 server In order to drop the table this alter statement must be executed before the drop table statement alter table AHILL.TABLE_4 drop restrict on drop; < syntax generated by PD> drop table AHILL.TABLE_4; create table AHILL.TABLE_4 ( F CHAR(5) A CHAR(5), G CHAR(5), H CHAR(5), constraint P_KEY_1 primary key (F) ) in database DSNDB04 with restrict on drop ccsid ebcdic;

not null,

======================================================================== Issue: 463324 03/21/07 Status: Closed 03/30/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Generate DB: 'Use database' statement no longer generated before drop ping object Description : *** Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:30:42 AM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBf8 &

12.5.0.2114 Target DBMS: ASE family Generate DB: 'Use database' statement is no longer generated before dropping objects. In previous releases, the 'use database' syntax was generated before the drop statements for objects. In 12.x, the 'use database' statement does not get generated until after the last drop statement is generated. To reproduce target DBMS: ASE 12.5.2 1) add table with several columns 2) add a database object 3) select generate database 4) for the database object select 'use database' for table object select all options 5) preview the ddl Note: the drop statement for the table is generated before the 'use database' statement. If the same is done in PD 11.x or earlier, the 'use database' syntax is generated before the drop statements. workaround is to add the 'use database' statement into the script header item in the XDB file. ======================================================================== Issue: 462683 03/14/07 Status: Closed 03/27/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB Gen: Object filter omits alternate key if not defined in table at model level Description : *** Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:03:41 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF7 & 12.5.0.2103 \\neo\cir\...\462683 Database generation: Object filter incorrectly filters 'alternate key' if there are no alternate keys defined at the model level. It appears that when an alternate does not exist at the root level of the model, PD incorrectly filters alternate keys from the Options tab of the Database Generation window. However, in the generated DDL, the alternate key is generated. Workaround: change the filter to view 'all objects' 1) Open sample PDM contains a table at the root and in a package. the table in the package has an alternate key defined 2) Select generate database Note: the alternate key option is not available for selection 3) Add an alternate key to the table at the root level 4) Select generate database Note: the alternate key option is now available ========================================================================

Issue: 461524 03/05/07 Status: Open Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Procedure with very long lines full of space cannot be generated Description : *** lundi 5 mars 2007 10:03:31 *** vaudino ***12.0 open procedure property sheet. call preview tab You have an hour glass and PD does not come back

======================================================================== Issue: 461272 03/01/07 Status: Closed 04/25/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : model Update: failed to connect to the target model Description : It is not possible to update a model when the target model has not been created from a generation, the first update will be OK but as soon as the source model will be closed and reopened, it will be not possible to update the target. Steps to reproduce 1 new CDM 1 entity 1 new PDM 1 table save both models from CDM generate with update the PDM select the pdm created save both models Check target models CDM : OK PDM is linked PDM nothing close the cdm reopen it from cdm generate with update the pdm in the select dropdown, the pdm is selected note : dbms is empty click ok got message : the model ... is not the target model, are you sure you want to use it in place of the target model yes Error message : failed to connect to the target model following by a model must be selected and it is not possible anymore to update the pdm Same problem between OOM and PDM, after the first update if OOM is closed, it will not possible anymore to update the PDM ======================================================================== Issue: 461238 02/28/07 Status: Closed 03/13/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Find Objects function can expose hidden Doucments name in Repository Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: -----------------------

Description of Problem: Using the access mode "List" on a Document requires that the Parent Node (folder) must have at least "Read" access permission. That means if Parent folder with "List" access mode will hide all the Documents inside the folder. However, it is reported that Repository function "Find Objects" does not care the access mode. Though the "Find Objects" function does not allow to search the Content of Documents, the function can expose the name of hidden documents of the folder. OS: Win XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PD 12.1 EBF 2 Versions and Build #s Tested: PD 12.1 EBF 7 Database/Driver File/Version: Tested with DataDirect OEM 5.1 SQL Server ODBC Comments: -------------------------------------------"Repository Browser View" need the Parent Node to have at least "Read Access Mode" to display the Child Content with "List Access Mode". e.g. Document with "List Access mode". Otherwise the Repository Browser View only Display the Parent Node and stop at the Parent Node. On the other hand, for "List Access Mode" Document, the "Find Objects" repository function does not care whether the Parent Node is at least "Read Access Mode" or not. It will just search to Documents Name with "List Access Mode". (but not the content of Doc with List mode). With this testing result, it seems that "Find Objects" function has a little conflict when compare with the "Repository Browser View". Besides, after the execution of "Find Objects", the "Repository Brower View" will be expanded to show more nested Folders and Document. i.e. The rule - "List Mode Document need the Parent Node to have at least 'Read Access Mode' " is no longer exist. -------------------------------------------======================================================================== Issue: 460689 02/23/07 Status: Closed 04/26/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Option "Update" gets disabled when updating model into repository Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1 and PD 12.1 EBF#6 When updating a model after a merge, the option "Update" gets disabled when updating model into repository.

========================================================================

Issue: 456058 02/13/07 Status: Closed 03/01/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Test data : value 10 with number(1) Description : Test data generates the value 10 even if length of the datatype is 1 reproduce with Number, decimal and float Steps to reproduce 1 table C1 Number(1) distinct value : 100% Generate test data No profile used Number of Rows : 20 In the list of values generated we got Number(10) Note : we got only the value 10 and not higher ======================================================================== Issue: 455955 02/12/07 Status: Closed 03/13/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Creation and Modification dates/users are set to Unkown in PDM to CDM generation Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1.0 and 12.1.0 EBF#6 When generating CDM from PDM, the Attribute Version Info properties display "Unkown" for Creation User, Creation Date and Modification User.

======================================================================== Issue: 454996 02/02/07 Status: Closed 03/01/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Shortcut objects in HTML report using SVG image are not hyperlinked ( navigable) Description : *** Friday, February 02, 2007 2:46:54 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 & 12.5.0 build 2071 \\neo\cir\...\454996 (includes sample model and generated reports) When generating HTML report using SVG as the image format, included shortcut objects do not have hyperlinks in the generated graphic. However, generating the same report with a different image format, the shorcut objects do have hyperlinks. To reproduce: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Go 6) 7) Open sample model Open the report in the model and select 'png' as the image format Generate a HTML report In the generated report,click on the package_2 diagram link Click on the entity shortcut back to PD Select 'svg' as the image format Generate a HTML report

8) In the generated report,click on the package_2 diagram link 9) Click on the entity shortcut NOTE: the entity shortcut is not hyperlinked ======================================================================== Issue: 454330 01/26/07 Status: Closed 03/01/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : HTML Report has broken link in "Next Button" for Table List Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1.0, 12.1.0 EBF#4, 12.1.0 EBF#5 and 12.1.0 EBF#6 After generating the HTML Report, when navigating through it, inside Table List, the Next button leads to a "Page not found". Similar CRs were fixed in previous builds of PD 12.1.0: CR#431348 and CR#426101

======================================================================== Issue: 454206 01/25/07 Status: Closed 02/15/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : View "instead of" triggers fail to reverse engineer via script for MS SQL SVR 2k Description : *** Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:59:36 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF5 \\neo\cir\...\454206 Target DBMS: MS SQL Server 2000 View "instead of" triggers fail to reverse engineer via script. Workaround: reverse engineer via ODBC To reproduce: 1) Reverse engineer mytest.sql Note: Trigger SQL is skipped 2) Reverse engineer the same via ODBC, the trigger is reverse engineered. ======================================================================== Issue: 452756 01/11/07 Status: Closed 04/26/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : After RE, a space is added in partion by range column list Description : A change has been detected in database synchronisation windows even if nothing has been modified in the model. It is due to the fact than PD adds a space in the table partition by range list columns after the reverse Steps to reproduce with PD 12 and 12.1 ebf 5 RE into a new PDM the following script create table T1 ( C1 CHAR, C2 CHAR, C3 CHAR ) partition by range (C2) ( partition Partition_1 values less than (0)

tablespace tspace); Without doing nothing Archive the model Go to T1 properties --> Tab partition Have a look at Column list a space has been added after the column name Click apply Generate a script to modify database, In the synchronisation windows, a change is detected due to the space added in the column list. Of course, if you archive the model again the problem will be solved ======================================================================== Issue: 452615 01/10/07 Status: Closed 01/25/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : DBcreateAfter is not analysed during generation when objects are in p ackages Description : cr 360644 is back in 12.1, has been fixed in 11 Regression, working fine in 11, 11.1, 12 Broken in 12.1 DBcreateAfter is not analysed during generation when objects are in packages. Problem occurs for views and for procedures. No problem without packages Steps to reproduce New pdm with 2 packages Package_1 : View_aa Package_2 : View_bb Add to View_aa, an extended dependencies to View_bb and select stereotype DBCreateAfter Generate the script View_aa has been generated before view_bb ======================================================================== Issue: 452410 01/08/07 Status: Closed 01/25/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : XEM ediotr: Model Type for Transformation Profile mapped to incorrect model type Description : *** Monday, January 08, 2007 11:05:57 AM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 **May be related to CR 319875** When adding a transformation profile to an XEM, the Model Type on a profile maps to the wrong model type. The following mappings are incorrect: 'Conceptual Data Model' maps to 'Erwin 3.5.x model as CDM' 'Erwin 3.5.x model as PDM' maps to 'Physical Data Model' 'Object-Oriented Model' maps to 'Rational Rose Class Diagram' To reproduce: Create an XEM and add a Transformation Profile Add a Profile Click the Model type combo box and select 'Conceptual Data Model' Note: The Model type immediately maps to 'Erwin 3.5.x model as CDM' ========================================================================

Issue: 452398 01/08/07 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Incorrect expression for view column when using distinct in SQL Query Description : When create a view with 'select distinct' or 'select all' in SQL query body , column expression is incorrect Steps to reproduce New PDM 1 table T1(C1 char, C2 char, C3 char) Create a view based on this table Go to check View column expression for C1 is T1.C1 Go to SQL Query and modify the statement Add "Distinct" after the select you should get select Distinct T1.C1, T1.C2, T1.C3 from T1 Go to tab view column Have a look at the column C1 Name is T1.C1 and expression is distinct ======================================================================== Issue: 451940 12/28/06 Status: Closed 04/09/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Some scripts not reversed ok for MS-SQL Server 2000 DBMS Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1 and PD 12.1 EBF#5. Some scripts with ALTER COLUMN and REVOKE/GRANT are successfully reversed into existent PDM, but no expected changings are done to the objects inside PDM.

======================================================================== Issue: 451781 12/21/06 Status: Closed 02/19/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Reverse view with distinct : no dependencies Description : Tested with 10, 11 but view columns dependencies didn't exist Broken in 11.1, 12 and 12.1 ebf 5 When reverse a view with "select distinct" or "select all" in SQL query body , column expression is incorrect and dependencies for the first view column is lost. Steps to reproduce RE into a new pdm the following script Create Table T1 (c1 char, c2 char)); Create view V1 as Select c1, c2 from

T1; View --> properties Dependencies : Table T1 OK View columns --> Properties for C1 and C2 Dependencies c1 parent Table T1 OK Modify the script by ading distinct, you should get Create view V1 as Select distinct c1, c2 from T1; Re into a new pdm the table and the view script go to check the view View --> properties dependencies : t1 ok column view c1 --> Porperties dependencies : empty column view C2 --> properties dependencies : OK Note : if Distinct is added in the SQL Query editor, no problem at all, problem occurs only during the reverse when the view query contains Distinct or All ======================================================================== Issue: 451779 12/21/06 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : No datatype when using select distinct in a View Description : Reproduced with PD 10.1, PD 11, PD 11.1 and PD 12.1 ebf 5 When create or reverse a view linked to a table, view column will have the datatype defined to the table column. If distinct or All is added in the query view the first column view will not have anymore a datatype Steps to reproduce New PDM 1 table T1(C1 char, C2 char) 1 view View Query Select C1, C2 from T1 go to check column view :datatypes are visible Modify the SQL Query by adding Distinct Select distinct C1, C2 from T1 apply, No datatype anymore for column view c1. If exporting data through automation the missing datatypes cause major problems.

======================================================================== Issue: 451749 12/20/06 Status: Closed 02/19/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Fail to consolidate repository when Item sequence changed in XML mode l. Description : Description of Problem: Item sequence of XML model with multiple Item types (e.g. Elements, Complex Types and Shortcuts of Complex Types) is NOT correctly updated to Repository. OS: Windows XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PowerDesigner 12.1.0.1948 EBF4 Versions and Build #s Tested: PowerDesigner 12.1.0.1960 EBF5 Database/Driver File/Version: Any Comments: ======================================================================== Issue: 451671 12/20/06 Status: Closed 04/13/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : PowerDesigner Java Proxies : sample JAR file doesn't return out para meters to t Description : in the PD scripting API, the pd2com_12.1.0.jar file doesn't return out parameters to the caller. One of our consultant(Christian Kuhle) did some modification to this file File modified has been copied in \\neo\CIR\CIRMails\45xxxx\451671 Eclipse SWT libraries only use datatype Variant as ByRef parameters, so they all have to be of type "COM.VT_VARIANT COM.VT_BYREF". The parameter handling inside the IDispatchEx.invoke method was changed to pass ByRef parameters with correct datatype. Return parameter handling after method execution needed changes as well, e.g. parameter order was reversed according to Microsofts OLE convention. Maybe parameter handling needs further refinement, at least ByRef parameter values are returned to the caller with these changes. I checked the file pd2com_12.1.0.jar sent by him and modification have been done in BaseObject.class public void GetCollectionByKind(/* in */ int kind, /* out */ ObjectBag[] collection) public void GetCollectionByKind(/* in */ int kind, /* out */ ObjectBag[] collection, /* in */ boolean compositionOnly) public boolean CanSetAttribute(/* in */ java.lang.String member, /* in */ VariantEx value, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message) public boolean CanAddInColl(/* in */ java.lang.String member, /* in */ BaseObject object, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message) public boolean CanRemoveInColl(/* in */ java.lang.String member, /* in */ BaseObject object, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message) public boolean CanCreateObject(/* in */ int kind, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message) public boolean CanCreateObject(/* in */ int kind, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message, /* in */ java.lang.String parentCol) public boolean CanCreateObject(/* in */ int kind, /* out */ java.lang.String[] message, /* in */ java.lang.String parentCol, /* in */ int pos)

CheckModelBaseItem.Class public void Verify(/* in */ BaseObject obj, /* out */ BaseObject[] msg) CheckModelControler.Class public void Execute(/* out */ int[] err, /* out */ int[] wrn) Changes in the code are marked with a comment line starting: //C. Kuhle The modification done is not complete, he only changed the classes that he was using in his application ======================================================================== Issue: 451335 12/15/06 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Teradata unique index with option generation inside :wrong syntax i s generated Description : Result OK in 11 broken in 12 and 12.1 Syntax is wrong for primary index when the database generation option create Index inside is checked Steps to reproduce New PDM Teradata 1 table with few columns and PK Create a new index linked to the pk Preview with the generation option Create Index Inside checked create table T1 ( C1 C2 C3 ); CHAR CHAR, CHAR not null,

create unique index IDX_1 ( C1 ) on T1; Instead of create table T1 ( C1 CHAR not null, C2 CHAR, C3 CHAR ) unique primary index IDX_1 ( C1 ); ======================================================================== Issue: 450460 12/14/06 Status: Closed 03/27/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Extended Attribute user method is not triggered by Column properties Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1 and PD 12.1 EBF#4. When coding an user method inside Extended Attributes and attempting to trigger it from within Attributes properties.

======================================================================== Issue: 450329 12/13/06 Status: Closed 01/25/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : Refresh : Undo action restores View column deleted with incorrect nam e Description : reproduce with 9.5, 9.5.1, 9.5.2, 10, 10.1, 11.1, 12.1 and with 12.5 20 27 Refresh problem in the browser on view column when view columns have been deleted and CRTL Z have been used. Close the model and reopen it solves the======================================================================== Issue Steps to reproduce New PDM ASA 1 view SQL Query Select A, B, C from Toto From the browser, delete view columns A and after B CTRL Z twice to cancel the 2 last actions In the browser, the result is A, A, C (in the diagram, view columns are OK) From the browser, Edit the properties of both A columns, Name/Code are correct First A : Name/Code is A Second A : Name/Code is B Even if It is only a refresh problem in the brouwser, it can be very annoying Note If you delete first column B and after column A, CTRL Z twice, in this case the result will be OK. *** mardi 23 janvier 2007 16:58:04 *** vaudino *** You should not be allowed to delete view column like this. It is forbidden in Columns grid from View property sheet and should be the same in the browser ======================================================================== Issue: 450318 12/13/06 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Update repository will increase alll views version number Description : Broken from V10, It was OK with previous version (tested with 9.5, 9.5. 1, 9.5.2) Broken In V10, V10.1 V 11, V11.1 V12.1 ebf 4 If you update the repository even if views are not modified their version numbers are increased New PDM ASA 2 views Vieuw : V1 SQL Query Select A

from Toto View 2 : V2 SQL Query Select B From Tata Consolidate with freeze after consolidation and extract Via ISQl, execuet the following select OBJT, VRSN, NAME from PMOBJT result OBJT VRSN NAME 48 1 V1 49 1 A 50 1 V2 51 1 B Return to the model and modify View V1 (only), modify sql query Select A, AA from Toto Consolidate with freeze In the merge model, view column is going to be added and sql query is going to be updated. Accept all the changes Note V2 is not going to be modified Check the reposiotry, all view versions have been increases Via ISQl, execute the following select OBJT, VRSN, NAME from PMOBJT result OBJT VRSN NAME 49 51 55 57 59 48 50 54 58 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 A B V1 A V2 V1 V2 AA B

delete the document in the rep and run the server with option -oc:asa9\test.sql in order to get the SQL executed during the update Consolidate with freeze and extract modify the PDM update view V1 Chech the trace got insert into PMOBJT(OBJT,CLSS,POID,BRNC,LVRS,FRZN,PVOB,VRSN,OCUS,OCDT,OMUS,OMDT,GOID,NAME,COD E,STRN,CMMT,DSCR,ANNT,HIST,OEXA,BCOL,CUSR,CDAT,MUSR,MDAT) select 59, 1211, POID, 1, 1, 0, 50, '2', 200, ?, 200, ?, GOID,NAME,CODE,STRN,CMMT,DSCR,ANNT,HIST,OEXA,BCOL,CUSR,CDAT,MUSR,MDAT from PMOBJT where OBJT=50 So why this version has been updated for View V2

New test New PDM View V1 Select A from Toto View V2 Select B from Tata Table T1 (C11 integer) Table T2(C21 integer) Consolidate with freeze in order to get version and extract modify pdm Table T1 add a new column consolidate with freeze Check the rep T1 version has been increased which is correct T2 version has not been increased which is correct but both view got their version number increased so even when no view have been modified, their version number are increased ======================================================================== Issue: 450239 12/12/06 Status: Closed 01/26/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Default Physical Options: Apply to list is empty for the Primary Key option Description : *** Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:49:51 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF4 \\neo\cir\...\450239 Target DBMS: Oracle and ASE family databases The customer is attempting to set Default Physical Options for Primary keys in a PDM targeting Oracle 9i. After setting the physical options, they select the Apply To button, but the list of PK objects is empty. There are over 200 PKs in the customer's model. (This works find in PD 11.1.0 EBF10.) To reproduce: 1) Open the customer's model or project.pdm (change target DB to Oracle or ASE 12 or greater) 2) Open Database\Default Physical Options and select Primary Key tab 3) Select Apply to button Note: There are no PK objects listed ======================================================================== Issue: 449500 12/04/06 Status: Closed 03/15/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Merge : Extended collection not updated for pdcommon metaclasses Description : PD fails to update extended collection value when the metaclass is comi ng from PDCommon Steps to reproduce Test 1 New PDM ASA In the xdb, add metaclass Business rule Defined an extended collection target type : Table

Into the new PDM, 2 tables T1, T2 add a business rule extended collection T1 From PDM1, generate PDM2 Return to PDM1 and business rule --> Properties --> collection add T2 Merge PDM 1 into PDM 2 In merge window, T2 is going to be added accept the change Model success fully merged Go to check in PDM 2, the business rule, the second table has not been added Test 2 New PDM ASA In the xdb, add metaclass Business rule Defined an extended collection target type : Table Into the new PDM, 2 tables T1, T2 add a business rule without extended collection From PDM1, generate PDM2 Return to PDM1 and business rule --> Properties --> collection add T1 Merge PDM 1 into PDM 2 In merge window, T1 is going to be added accept the change Model successfully merged Go to check in PDM 2, the business rule : no problem at all So problem occurs only when the collection contains already an object I reproduced using CDM with XEM using Business rule, Traitement Merise with XEM and Business rule PDM with XDB using FileObject or ExtendedObject metaclass Repository update Note cutomer got the problem during a repository update with Traitement merise Model metaclass Business rules Extended Collection target type Data Due to this problem, it cannot update the repository ======================================================================== Issue: 449389 12/01/06 Status: Closed 04/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : RE by ODBC IQ 12.6 Unable to list the columns Description : If database has the option quoted_identifier = 'OFF', when RE by ODBC t he database, an error occurs with the following mesage Unable to list the columns. [Sybase][ODBC Driver][Adaptive Server Anywhere]Syntax error near 'default' on line 11 SQLSTATE = 37000 Due to this option, it will be not possible to list the domain error for the domain will be Unable to List the domains Syntax error near 'Check' on line 6 Check xdb file and

SYASIQ1260::Script\Objects\Column\SqlListQuery replace case(lower(c."default")) by case(lower(c.[default])) SYASIQ1260::Script\Objects\Domain\SqlListQuery replace d."check" by d.[check] Steps to reproduce Start asiqdemo version 12.6 via ISQL, execute the following set option public.quoted_identifier ='OFF'; By default quoted_identifier ='ON' From PDesigner New PDM IQ 12.6 RE via ODBC the database using standard ODBC driver Errors will occur Note : [Check] and [Default] is working using quoted_identifier ='OFF' or 'ON' So could be betert o use this syntax We could get similar problem with item SYASIQ1260::Script\Objects\Key\SqlAkeyIndex i."unique" not in ('Y', 'N') ======================================================================== Issue: 449099 11/28/06 Status: Closed 01/25/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : RQM is exported incorrectly to printable area of MS-Word Description : PowerDesigner 12.1.0.1943 EBF 3 MS-Office 2000/2003/2007 When RQM is exported to MS-Word, exported Word file is not shown by MS-Word. But the correct details are shown in outline mode of MS-Word. Nothing is shown in printing display mode. Is that the details of RQM are shown only for outline display mode specification? TSE sent email to powerdesigner_team. ----- Forwarded by Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE on 2006/11/28 PM 02:02 ----Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE 2006/11/27 PM 05:32 To powerdesigner@sybase.com, powerdesigner_team@sybase.com cc Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE Subject Exported Word document from RQM is not printable Hi all, I exported a RQM to MS-Word 2000. The RQM was exported to the outline area for MS-Word correctly. However it was not printable. How can I print the exported document ? Are there any options to do so ? I tested with PowerDesigner12.1.0.1943 EBF 3, and put the test result in bellow; - RQM for test: http://wwwdse.sybase.com/cases/11301000s/11301623/tse_info/RequirementsModel_1.rqm

- The exported Word document: http://wwwdse.sybase.com/cases/11301000s/11301623/tse_info/RequirementsModel_1.doc Thank you, Masahiro Koyanagi TSE Japan ----- Forwarded by Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE on 2006/11/28 PM 02:02 ----Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE 2006/11/23 AM 09:41 To powerdesigner@sybase.com, powerdesigner_team@sybase.com cc Masahiro Koyanagi/SYBASE Subject Export as word documents in Requirement Model Hi all, My customer run "Export as word documents" for Requirement Model. Then the model was exported to the outline area of MS-Word. However he expected to export to the printable area. Is this behavior normal ? Are there any methods to export the model to the printable area of MS-Word ? Any suggestions or comments are appreciated. Thank you, Masahiro Koyanagi TSE Japan ======================================================================== Issue: 448504 11/21/06 Status: Closed 02/15/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Modify Database: table rename cause ODBC error due to existing synony m Description : *** Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:46:31 AM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF4 \\neo\cir\...\448504 Target DBMS: DB2 7 OS/390 Customer has tables with synonyms associated with them. They modify the table with a change that forces the table to be dropped and recreated. The PD generated modify script does not contain syntax to drop the synonymn before renaming the table. As a result, the rename of the table fails with an ODBC error: [DataDirect][ODBC DB2 Wire Protocol driver][UDB DB2 for OS/390 and z/OS]Unknown error: SQLCODE -148 SQLSTATE = S1000 If the DDL is modified to drop the synonym associate with the table, then the RENAME statement succeeds. Per the DB2 documentation, the RENAME statement can't be used if a synonym is associate with the table. To reproduce: 1) Open the syn_test1.apm file and execute generate database (may need to change

table owner) 2) Open syn_test1.pdm and execute modify database and reference syn_test1.apm 3) Execute the modify script via ODBC. ======================================================================== Issue: 448230 11/17/06 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : BUG: The MMR page setups' margins and orientation values are not save d Description : *** Friday, November 17, 2006 3:19:17 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 thru EBF4 The customer has created a multi-model report, MMR. In a section, they change the page setup orientation option from portrait to landscape. After saving the MMR, closing it and reopening it, the orientation option has reverted back to portrait and all the margins are now 1 inch. Perviously, they ranged from .315 .433 inches. To reproduce: 1) Add several models to workspace 2) Create a MMR 3) Select Page Setup for Section_1 4) Change the Orientation to landscape Note: The values for the Margins 5) Save the MMR and close it. 6) Reopen the MMR and review the Page Setup options Note: The orientation is portrait and the margins are set to 1 inch ======================================================================== Issue: 447940 11/15/06 Status: Closed 03/12/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Generate DB: Create rule syntax generate twice based on selected char acter case Description : *** Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:24:27 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF2 \\neo\cir\...\447940 This======================================================================== Issue may be related to CR 291531. Target DBMS: ASE 12.5 Generate DB: Create rule syntax is generated twice based on selected character case. PD is generating an extra business rule when the EnableBindRule option is set to yes for the column object in the DBMS and the character case is uppercase or lowercase under the database generation options. To reproduce: DBMS modified to set EnableBindRule to yes for the column object Create a validation rule Create a table with a column Add the business rule to the column Under Model Properties select Preview Select Database Generation Options and select the Format tab. Set the Character Case to uppercase or lowercase.

Note: Two create rule statements are generated (for the business rule and for the column). Select Database Generation Options and select the Format tab. Set the Character Case to mixed case. Note: Only one create rule statement is generated. ======================================================================== Issue: 447878 11/15/06 Status: Closed 01/25/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : RQM:Generat RTF report file is incorrect when Japanese Font is set in templete. Description : OS: Windows XP SP2 PD: 11.1 EBF#10, 12.0 EBF#4 When Japanese fonts are set as template of RQM, PD generates wrong RTF. Could not open the generated file by MS-WORD. This======================================================================== Issue occured when he set MS P Gothic in TOC Title for Report Templete. This issus also occurs with MS Mincho or others. When it sets up except Japanese fonts, PD generates the correct tag. {\f23\fswiss Tahoma;} {\f24\fmodern MS UI Gothic;} } {\colortbl ; But when Japanese fonts are set up, PD generates wrong tag. {\f23\fswiss Tahoma;} {\f24\fmodern MS UI Gothic;} {\f25\fmodern l r o S V b N{\colortbl ;

<---- "}" is insufficient.

When it changes as follows, RTF can be opened by MS-WORD. {\f23\fswiss Tahoma;} {\f24\fmodern MS UI Gothic;} {\f25\fmodern l r o S V b N;} } {\colortbl ; This is fatal======================================================================== Issue when using PD in Japanese environment. ======================================================================== Issue: 447797 11/14/06 Status: Closed 04/18/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Proxy server: PDM with views fails to extract from migrated repositor y Description : *** Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:55:14 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 EBF2 This======================================================================== Issue appears to be related to CR 396183. Repository server : MS SQL Server 2000

Target DBMS: DB2 8 common server Proxy server: PDM with views fails to extract from migrated repository Customer has upgraded from PD 11.x to PD 12.1.0 EBF2. Via a direct connection to the repository, they can consolidate and extract all models. However, via a proxy server connection, they get the following error message when extracting a PDM: PowerDesigner Error A command sent to the repository proxy failed. 22005 (SQLSTATE [Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] Invalid character value for cast specification) When reviewing the proxy server log, the following warning is documented after this ODBC error: ExtractModel: Failed when extracting OBJT = 20466 Upon querying the PMOBJT table, this object id belongs to a view To reproduce: 1) Create a repository in v10.1.x and consolidate a PDM that contains a table and a view 2) Upgrade the repository to v11.1.x and add a second table and view to the PDM and consolidate it 3) Upgrade the repository to v12.1 4) Via a direct connection, extract the PDM NOTE: extraction of the odel succeeds 5) Via a proxy server connection, extract the PDM NOTE: The extraction fails with the stated error. A repository using these repro steps exists on the TBONE server. Database login: pd_eng Database password: pd_eng1 Server: tbone Database: ts_data Repository login: Repository password Proxy server: Port: Instance: ADMIN <BLANK> tbone 30000 tsdata

======================================================================== Issue: 447181 11/08/06 Status: Closed 04/18/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Informix : Indexes based on function not RE by ODBC Description : Indexes based on function are not RE by ODBC. Such indexes are stored in the system table sysindices Steps to reproduce Against a server informix , execute the following script create table T_Index ( C1 integer not null, C2 integer,

C3 integer, C4 char(5), primary key (C1) constraint pk_T_Index ) ; create unique cluster index my_i1 on T_Index ( C2 ASC, C3 ASC ); create function my_lower (input_str char(5)) returning char(5) with (not variant); Define Result Char(5); Let Result = LOWER(input_str); Return Result; end function; / create index my_i2 on T_Index ( my_lower(C4) ASC ); Re into a new PDM informix Index my_i2 has not been RE Checked the informix system tables Indexes are stored in the view sysindexes which is based on the system table sysindices Indexes function are stored in the table sysindices in the column indexkeys which has the datatype indexkeyarray This column stored the information like the following (function id, Col1,...,coln). The fields within the indexkeys columns have the following significance: The function id appears only if the index is on return values of a function that is defined over the columns of the table. (That is, if the index is a functional index.) Here the function id is the same as the procid value for the function in the sysprocedures table. The list of the columns (col1, ... , coln) in the second field identifies the columns over which the index is defined. The operator class id shows the secondary access method that is used to build and to search the index. Here the operator class id is the same as the opclassid of the access method in the sysopclasses table. To access to this information, you have to use something similar to Select indexkeyarray_out(indexkeys) as my_info from sysindices where idxname = 'my_i2' The result will be similar to <177>(4)[1] where 177 is the id of the function and 4 the column number Select p.procname '(' c.colname ')' From informix.sysprocedures p, informix.sysindices i,

informix.systables t, informix.syscolumns c Where t.tabid=i.tabid and c.tabid = t.tabid and c.colno = substr(indexkeyarray_out(i.indexkeys),7,1) and p.procid = substr(indexkeyarray_out(i.indexkeys),2,3) and i.idxname = 'my_i2' will return my_lower(c4) ======================================================================== Issue: 446514 11/01/06 Status: Closed 02/08/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : BPEL4WS 1.1 : translation error unresolved member: isCompensate Description : Steps to reproduce New BPM target BPEL4WS 1.1 Add a process P1, decompose it into the new sub-diagram, add a new process P11, a synchronization and a flow between the process and the synchronisation Flow --> properties --> Tab condition Event : create a new one and properties in order to select a stereotype : Fault or compensation Note : no problem when the stereotype is timer Preview P11 result OK Decompose P11 Preview BPEL4WS 1.1::Profile\Flow\Criteria\isCatch\Templates\definition(3) (Flow "Flow_1"): [translation error] unresolved member: isCompensate Check the xpl file and BPEL4WS 1.1::Profile\Flow\Criteria\isCatch\Templates\definition .if (%Destination.isCompensate%) is calling a template which doesn't exist when the destination is a synchronization Under BPEL4WS 1.1::Profile\Synchronization\Templates, there are only isJoin or isSplit The problem will not occur when P11 is not decomposed or the flow is not a Fault or compensation or the destination is not a synchronisation ======================================================================== Issue: 446474 10/31/06 Status: Closed 03/13/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Model Dependencies not listed after changing target model of a Data S ource Description : Description of Problem: After saving AS NEW MODEL , and changing target model of a Data Source OOM Dependencies not listed OS: Windows Versions and Build #s Reported: PowerDesigner 12.1.0.1924 EBF1 Versions and Build #s Tested: PowerDesigner 12.1.0.1924 EBF2 Database/Driver File/Version: Comments:

======================================================================== Issue: 446401 10/31/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : FK column migrated from a shortcut badly regenerated Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1 EBF#2 When applying vertical partitioning in a PDM table, eliminate the references and then generate it again from CDM with "preserve modifications" set, the references do not exist but their respective columns are improperly generated. *** 09 November 2006 16:14:16 *** vaudino *** change title for a more accurate one for future reference new title: FK column migrated from a shortcut badly regenerated old title: PDM Columns improperly generated after applying vertical partitioning into model ======================================================================== Issue: 446380 10/31/06 Status: Closed 03/21/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Triggers are not previewed in Preview tab of table properties Description : Tested and reproduced with PD 12.1 EBF#2 The trigger scripts for a table are not previewed in the Preview Tab.

======================================================================== Issue: 445864 10/25/06 Status: Closed 02/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : XML Model Mapping Editor: Unable to map table columns to XML elements Description : *** Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:33:52 PM *** ahill *** 11.1.0 & 12.1. x XML Model Mapping Editor: Unable to map table columns to XML elements To reproduce: 1 Create PDM with a table and several columns 2 Generate from PDM an XML model using the XML generation option of "elements" in the Detail Tab 3 In the XML model bring up the Mapping Editor. 4 Set data source to your PDM source gen 5 Try to map table column to XML elements The XML model only displays the 'database' element but no nested elements to map to. If I change the embedded type on the database element from 'complex' to 'none',

then all the elements are listed in the mapping editor. *** Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:33:52 PM *** vaudino *** "complex" should not be added on database element during model generation ======================================================================== Issue: 445008 10/18/06 Status: Closed 04/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Informix : cluster designation is not RE by ODBC Description : 'clustered' designation for index is not reversing by ODBC Steps to reproduce Generate the following script against an Informix 9 server create table my_dbo.my_t ( column_1 integer column_4 integer, column_2 integer, column_3 integer, primary key (column_1) constraint pk_my_t ) ;

not null,

--============================================================== -- Index: my_i --============================================================== create unique cluster index my_dbo.my_i on my_dbo.my_t ( column_2 ASC, column_3 ASC ); RE into a new PDM Cluster information is not RE ======================================================================== Issue: 444259 10/11/06 Status: Closed 04/27/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Erwin 4.x Import: Identity column datatype not imported for DB2 datab ase model Description : *** Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:00:36 PM *** ahill *** 11.1.0 & 12.1 .0 \\neo\cir\...\444259 When importing an ERWin model with DB2 UDB 7 as the target DBMS, the identity columns are not imported properly. The column is imported, but is missing the identity option and the physical options, start with and increment by, values. To reproduce: Import Tony_test.XML or do the following Create an ERWin 4.x model with target DBMS DB2 UDB 7 or 8. Add a couple of tables with several columns. On table_1, add an identity column with a start and increment value

Create a domain with a datatype that supports an identity column On table_2, associate this domain to a column and make the column an identity column with a start and increment value. save the model and import it into PD. NOTE: The 'identity' information associated with the column is not imported. In the customer's model, the column is named "WORKFORCE MEMBER IDENTIFIER" in the table 'LOADING WORKFORCE MEMBER PROPERTY' ======================================================================== Issue: 443058 09/27/06 Status: Closed 04/18/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : PhysOpt-DB2 Index option Include Columns incorrectly list existing in dex columns Description : *** Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:00:21 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 Target DBMS: DB2 8 Common Server PhysOpt-DB2-Index option Include Columns incorrectly list existing index columns. The columns not currently included in the index should be listed. On Physical Options (Common) For option Include Column : clicking on button for list of columns lists the existing index columns. If these columns are selected, PD generates invalid DDL. When the DDL is executed, the following ODBC error occurs: "column_xxx' is duplicate column name

This was implemented in CR 403752 PhysOpt-DB2-Index-Include Columns-Clicking on button does nothing ======================================================================== Issue: 442904 09/26/06 Status: Closed 02/05/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Add support for DB2 9, UDB and OS/390 Description : *** Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:17:03 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 Add support for DB2 9, UDB and OS/390

======================================================================== Issue: 442622 09/22/06 Status: Closed 03/21/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : keeps creating temporary tables instead ofgenerating sp_rename Description : Modify Database after changing the mandatory property of a column generates a temp table followed insert into statements instead of simple sp_rename although option 'Use alter statements when possible' has been enable OS: Windows XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PDes 12.0 EBF3 MSS 2000

Versions and Build #s Tested: PDes 12.1 EBF1 MSS 2000 Database/Driver File/Version: MSS 2000 Comments: Step-By-Step Instructions: 1* Open sdehandler pdm_v7.pdm 2* Go to Database > Modify Database... 3* Select archive model named sdehandler pdm_v7.apm 4* Check 'One file only' and select 'Use alter statements when possible' option. Click OK >> It detects no changes at all so the generated file is empty. You can use the customized XDB on ectsss20 or change the pk/fk name filter to get rid of those changes. 5* Open the property sheet of Table e_event_document and make column id_lndr (#6) mandatory. 6* Go to Database > Modify Database... >> It generates create table tmp_e_event_document ( ...) go set identity_insert tmp_e_event_document on go insert into tmp_e_event_document (...) select ... from e_event_document go set identity_insert tmp_e_event_document off go Changing the mandatory property column is neverthless not complex enough to force the creation of a temporary table. If I start from scratch using a new blank model, I nor cust do not reproduce anymore with or without using internal shortcuts. I simply get: execute sp_rename TABLE_1, tmp_TABLE_1 go The temporary table is caused by using domains. However done a couple of tests showing that sp_rename is accepted by MSS server with domains, so PDes should manage that syntax instead of CREATE and INSERT INTO statements. The following script does return no error at all. execute sp_addtype Domain_1, 'integer' go execute sp_addtype Domain_2, 'integer' go create table Table_11281061 ( COL_1 Domain_1 not null, COL_2 Domain_2 null, COL_3 int constraint PK_Table_11281061 primary key (COL_1) )

null,

go alter table Table_11281061 drop constraint PK_Table_11281061 go execute sp_rename Table_11281061, tmp_Table_11281061 go create table Table_11281061 ( COL_1 Domain_1 not null, COL_2 Domain_2 not null, COL_3 int not null, constraint PK_Table_11281061 primary key (COL_1) ) go insert into Table_11281061 (COL_1, COL_2, COL_3) select COL_1, COL_2, COL_3 from tmp_Table_11281061 go drop table tmp_Table_11281061 go Test Case (zip file) Name: \\Neo\cir\CIRMails\44xxxx\442622\442622.zip ======================================================================== Issue: 442017 09/15/06 Status: Closed 10/30/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : IBM DB2 MVS7 : fails to reverse piecesize value via ODBC Description : IBM DB2 MVS7 : fails to reverse piecesize value via ODBC Please update the XDB files Reverse a schema which has a table index with piecseize option set to a numeric value followed by " K" For instance, create type 2 unique index INDEX_1 on TABLE_1 ( COL_1 ASC, COL_2 ASC ) piecesize 2097152 K; " K" has been lost at reverse via ODBC. I am able to reproduce the======================================================================== Issue using the PB DataDirect Wire Protocol. Removing the extra space char between the piecesize value and K Steps to fix it: 1* Go to Database > Edit Current DBMS... 2* Select DB2MVS7::Script\\Objects\\Index\\SqlOptsQuery 3* Remove the extra space char between the piecesize value and K Previous value concat case i.piecesize when 0 then '' else ' piecesize ' concat varchar(i.piecesize) concat ' K' end New value concat case i.piecesize when 0 then '' else ' piecesize ' concat

varchar(i.piecesize) concat 'K' end

======================================================================== Issue: 441880 09/13/06 Status: Closed 01/29/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : Change text of PD confirmation message for backwards compatibility Description : *** Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:09:45 PM *** ahill *** 12.0.0 Customer has both PD 11 and PD 12 installed. They made the mistake of associating a v12 resource file with a v11 model. In PD 11 when they open the model, a PD message is generated stating: PowerDesigner - Confirmation: The model you wish to open has been saved with a more recent version (12.0.0.1700) than the one you are using (11.1.0.1604). It is strongly recommended you update your version of the product. If you choose to open the model with this version, the integrity of the model is not guaranteed in the case that is opens successfully. In addition, the model will be opened in read-only mode. Seeing that the version of the model is v11, they customer feels that this dialogue is incorrect and misleading. They suggest the following: <customer comments> "Please create a different dialog box if only a support file has been updated. Do NOT say that the model itself is updated. Treat the situation similar to if the XDB file is missing. Offer the user the chance to select an alternate XDB. Be specific about which file is actually updated." ======================================================================== Issue: 441849 09/13/06 Status: Closed 04/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB2 5 XDB: Index SqlAttrQuery where clause includes extra 'where' tex t Description : *** Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:51:24 AM *** ahill *** 9.5.1, 10.1 , 11.1, 12.1 Target DBMS: DB2 5 OS/390 In the XDB, the SqlAttrQuery for the Index script object contains an extra 'where' in the where clause. <snip> from sysibm.sysindexes where where uniquerule not in ('P', 'U') <snip> ======================================================================== Issue: 441836 09/13/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06

Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : two tables with same names and distinct users are not reversed in cor rect folder Description : *** mercredi 13 septembre 2006 11:39:16 *** mledier *** Reverse the following script in PowerDesigner (I used ASA xdb) << create table mledier.t(a integer) ; create table psitja.t(a integer) ; >> In model, create two packages, one for each user and move the corresponding table in them. Reverse again the script, the merge window shows move action, it should not. OK the merge window, both tables are in the same package. If the tables had distinct names, it would work correctly... ======================================================================== Issue: 441799 09/12/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : "Table Trigger Code Preview" node ignores 'generation settings' at pa ckage level Description : *** Tuesday, September 12, 2006 4:49:29 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 \\neo\cir\...\441799 In a PDM with packages, the customer has created a generation setting to exclude the 'drop statement' for triggers. In a report, the customer is including the 'Table Trigger Code Preview' node at the model and package levels. When they preview the report, the triggers at the model level correctly exclude the 'drop trigger' statement. However, the triggers at the package level incorrectly have the 'drop trigger' statement included. To reproduce: 1) open sample model - includes 2 tables with references at the root and 2 tables with references in a package - along with a report that includes the 'Table Trigger Code Preview' node at the model and package levels 2) generate or preview the report ======================================================================== Issue: 441760 09/12/06 Status: Closed 09/28/06 Severity : 0 Est. release: tyresias Label : PD12.1/OOM: attribute values can not be set for an object of a class. Description : In a object diagram, attribute values can not be set for an object of a class. In Object properties, Add Attributes Values option doesn't retrieve any attributes from the Class. Failed in PD 12.1.1924 Okay in PD 11.x

To reproduce: ---------------------------------create a new oomodel -create a new class diagram -create a new class, "customer", with "first name" and "last name" as attributes -create a new object diagram -place an object onto the diagram, edit properties: classifier "customer" -> Attributes Values tab -> Add Attribute Values -> empty list, nothing to add issue is also reproduced in a Sequence diagram (follow the same steps), no attributes values can be assigned to an object with a classifier defined.

======================================================================== Issue: 441657 09/11/06 Status: Closed 11/24/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Custom form : text field do not word wrap Description : *** lundi 11 septembre 2006 12:01:20 *** vaudino ***12.1 GA create a free model with a text extended attribute in a form type a long text in it the text does not word wrap

======================================================================== Issue: 441309 09/06/06 Status: Closed 10/26/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : PD 12/Informix 9:mandatory option(if present) is removed using Modify Database Description : PD12/Informix 9:property mandatory of a column is removed during Modify Database PD12.1/Informix: If a column has a default value, and the table is reversed engineering, the default value is reversed. But in the next Modify Database, if there's an alter table, it will be ignored and the script generated will remove it. E: PD 12.1.0.1913 To reproduce: -------------------------1. Execute this script in an Informix database create table test (a integer, b char(5) not null) 2. Reverse Engineering in a new pdm 3. The mandatory column has been RE correctly 4. In the pdm, add a default value for b 5. Modify Database -> option "Use Alter statements when possible" should be selected 6. Script generated is alter table test modify b char(5) default "a";

7. Run the script in the database, column is now a null column, not null property is lost. ======================================================================== Issue: 441022 08/31/06 Status: Closed 02/12/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Teradata reverse engineer via script fails for tables with the 'no lo g' option Description : *** Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:40:15 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 PD is able to generate a table with the 'no log' option specified. However, when you try to reverse engineer the table via script, all the attributes of the table are ignored. If the 'no log' syntax is removed from the create table syntax, the table reverses correctly. To Reproduce: 1. Reverse Engineer the following script: create GLOBAL TEMPORARY table DFLT_CAPN_GTT, no log ( ETL_ROW_ID DECIMAL(18) MBR_KEY VARCHAR(70), PKG_NBR VARCHAR(6) ) unique primary index ( ETL_ROW_ID ) on commit PRESERVE rows; not null,

======================================================================== Issue: 441017 08/31/06 Status: Closed 02/12/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB2 UDB 8.x Common Server xdb: Key\SqlListQuery is missing the 'order by' clause Description : *** Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:00:03 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 Target DBMS: IBM DB2 UDB 8.x Common Server When reverse engineering a database via ODBC, the customer is experiencing situations where the key column order is incorrect. They are requesting that an 'order by' statement be added to the XDB file. adding this to the "DB2UDB8::Script\Objects\Key\SqlListQuery" entry would guarentee the records for the Key column are reversed in the correct column order. Customer comments: If a key has more than one column, the SqlListQuery could return them in any order. The MVS version of this query includes the line "order by 1, 2, 3, 4, c.colseq". The colseq will force the key columns into the proper order. By adding this line to the UDB query, it works, so there is a work-around. Please update the shipping product to order the key columns. If the columns come back in the right order, it is by coincidence. In our

database, they aren't coming back in order, because there is no order by statement. You know databases, if you don't specify an order by, the records come back, but the order returned is not guaranteed. Every query statement used by PowerDesigner MUST contain an order by clause. ======================================================================== Issue: 440999 08/31/06 Status: Closed 03/31/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Rev ODBC ASE12: Dialog Error selecting Domain Tab due to varchar data type size Description : *** Thursday, August 31, 2006 2:49:20 PM *** ahill *** 12.0.0 & 12.1.0 Target DBMS: ASE 12.5.x When reverse engineering an ASE 12.5.3 or 12.5.4 database, selecting the Domains tab results in the following error: 'Unable to List the Domains: <ODBC Driver reference> Arithmetic overflow occurred. sqlstate = 22003' When the Domain\SqlListQuery is executed via Isql, the following error is returned: 'Arithmetic overflow during implicit conversion of INT value '1048' to a TINYINT field.' In the database, there are two domains one varchar(1048) and the other varchar(2048). The presence of these domains are causing the error to occur. To resolve the======================================================================== Issue, make the following change to the Domain\SqlListQuery: Workaround: Edit Current DBMS for ASE 12.5.x: Script > Objects > Domain Edit the SqlListQuery Add the Following line to the Case Statement when 39 then d.length The Case Statement Now looks like the Following: case(t.type) when 135 then d.length/@@unicharsize when 155 then d.length/@@unicharsize when 39 then d.length else isnull(d.prec, d.length) end, ======================================================================== Issue: 440816 08/29/06 Status: Closed 08/31/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB & Modify generation: Synonyms created before Base Object Description : *** Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:48:35 PM *** ahill *** 11.1.0 & 12.1.0 \\neo\cir\...\440816

This======================================================================== Issue appears to be related to CR 400470. Target DBMS: DB2 7 OS/390 and DB8 OS/390 In v11.1, Modify Database generates the create synonym DDL before the base object, in this case tables. In v12, DB generation and modify DB generates the create synonym DDL before the base object, in this case tables. In testing, the problem appears to be due to the dependency between tablespaces and databases within the model. On the tablespaces, the database physical option is specified. On each table, the tablespace physical option is specified. This results in the tablespace physical otpion being generated as <database>.<tablespace> on the table physical option. When this occurs, the synonym referencing the table as a base object is created before the table. To reproduce: 1)Customer's .pdm and .apm pair can be used to repro in v11 or 2) use syn_before_base_obj.pdm to see the problem in v12 ======================================================================== Issue: 440798 08/29/06 Status: Closed 08/31/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Selecting Force Column List option for view does not generate column list Description : *** Tuesday, August 29, 2006 3:16:08 PM *** ahill *** 12.0.0 EBF4 & 12.1.0 GA Selecting the "Force column list" in the database generation for views doesn't generate the columns for the view. This worked in v11.1.0. To reproduce 1) Create a view with several columns (tested using ASA 10, Oracle 9i, Oracle 10g as target DBMS) 2) Select the 'Force Column List' generation option 3) Preview the view ======================================================================== Issue: 440792 08/29/06 Status: Closed 08/31/06 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Modify Database: selecting the 'Options' tab closes the PD applicatio n Description : *** Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:27:00 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0.1913 \\neo\cir\...\440792 Target DBMS: Informix 9 PowerDesigner crashes when the 'Options' tab is selected on the Modify Database property window.

To reproduce: Using the customer's model, if you select Modify Database and then select the 'Options' tab, PD immediately shuts down. (Customer's model was migrated from 12.0.0 EBF4.) Using a sample model (repro.pdm), select Modify Database and the select the 'Options' tab. On the Options tab, click the 'show all objects' tool. PD will then shut down. repro steps for sample model: 1) Create a new PDM ( Informix 9 & SQL server 2005 were selected as the target DBMS) 2) Add a table with several columns 3) Select Modify Database 4) Select the Options tab 5) On the Options tab, click the 'show all objects' tool. Note: PD will then shut down. *** Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:40:53 PM *** ahill *** Customer is requesting an EBF for this======================================================================== Issue. ======================================================================== Issue: 440776 08/29/06 Status: Closed 09/11/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Print preview in "generate report" dialog delete the report Description : *** mardi 29 aot 2006 17:35:40 *** vaudino ***12.1 GA in any model create a report launch Report > Generate report select the report and select Print preview close the print preview the report has been deleted

======================================================================== Issue: 440647 08/28/06 Status: Closed 09/07/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : VSNET-Close ModelExplorer-Close solution-Model Explorer brings up its elf Description : *** Monday, August 28, 2006 14:11:58 *** jnsane ***1913 Object : PD Visual Studio - Model Explorer - Closing Solution 1-Open VS2005 within PD plug-in 2-Create a new project e.g Visual C"->Windows Application 3-Display Model Explorer View 4-Close Model Explorer View 5-Run "File->>Close Solution" -->Get that the solution is closed -->The Model explorer is displayed : it should not. PS : works if we : close solution, the model explorer, close visual studio, reopen VS2005.

======================================================================== Issue: 440440 08/24/06 Status: Closed 04/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Informix : functions are not RE by ODBC Description : DBMS : Informix Functions are not RE by ODBC, only stored proc are RE Steps to reproduce Against informix execute the following script CREATE FUNCTION update_tdefault ( pct INT, pid CHAR(10)) RETURNING INT RETURN pct; END FUNCTION RE into PD using ODBC connection Select the function listed in the odbc windows Inside PD, check th functionjsut RE, Defintion has not been RE Checked Informix doc IBM Informix Guide to SQL Reference System catalog SYSPROCEDURE Page 1-59 Parameter isproc char(1) Whether routine is a procedure or a function t = procedure f = function ======================================================================== Issue: 440335 08/23/06 Status: Closed 09/01/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Unwanted Ellipses displayed in entity compartent in IDEFIX mode Description : *** mercredi 23 aot 2006 17:50:29 *** vaudino ***12.1 GA create a CDM/PDM with IDEF1X notation create an enioty with PK attributes, not PK attributes and identifier you have "..." at the end of each comparment that were not here before

======================================================================== Issue: 440301 08/23/06 Status: Closed 04/08/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Informix : Datatype CHAR(X) is RE by ODBC without parenthesis Description : DBMS : Informix Parenthesis is missed when RE by ODBC datatype Char(value) Steps to reproduce Against Informix database execute the following script Create Table T1(C1 CHAR(5)); RE by ODBC into a new PDM using PD Datadirect wire protocol result is CHAR5

======================================================================== Issue: 440212 08/22/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Informix modify database : column check constraints are not created Description : DBMS : Informix When generate a script to modify database with option Backup table and "Use alter statement when possible" checked, Column check constraints are not recreated. Steps to reproduce New PDM Informix 9 New table T1, C1 PK C2 C2 properties --> Check constraint Min : 0 Mx : 10 Archive the model Modify the mdel in order to have a drop/create table in the modify database script Add a new cluster unique index based on C2 Generate a script to modify database Backup table checked Use Alter statement when possible : checked Got the following script alter table T1 drop constraint PK_T1; alter table T1 drop constraint CKC_C2_T1; drop table tmp_T1; rename table T1 to tmp_T1; --============================================================== -- Table : T1 --============================================================== create table T1 ( C1 INT C2 INT, primary key (C1) constraint PK_T1 ); insert into T1 (C1, C2) select C1, C2 from tmp_T1; alter table T1 modify C2 INT; --============================================================== -- Index : INDEX_1 --============================================================== create unique cluster index INDEX_1 on T1 ( C2 ASC ); not null,

The constraint has be dropped but again here following cr 440186 done for ASA, ModifyColnChck is applied instead to AddColnChck with this time a syntax error , have a look to the Alter table alter table T1 modify C2 INT; I checked the informix 9 doc IBM Informix Guide to SQL Syntax Alter table Modify clause page 2-65 MODIFY Clause Use the MODIFY clause to change the data type, length, or default value of a column, or to allow or disallow NULL values in a column. Is it allowed to modify a column check constraint ? ======================================================================== Issue: 440186 08/22/06 Status: Closed 09/01/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Modify database : modify constraint is used instead of add constraint Description : DBMS : ASA When modify database script without any modification on the column constraint ; modify column constraint syntax is used instead of add column constraint. Steps to reproduce Modify the xdb file following the cr 440185 New PDM ASA 1 Table T1, C1 PK, C2 C2 check constraint Min 1, max 10 Archive the model Modifiy the model in order to get a create table Insert a new column between C1 and C2 Modify database script Backup tables : checked Use ALter table statements when possible result alter table T1 delete primary key; alter table T1 drop constraint CKC_C2_T1; if exists( select 1 from sys.systable where table_name='tmp_T1' and table_type in ('BASE', 'GBL TEMP') ) then drop table tmp_T1 end if; alter table T1 rename tmp_T1; /*==============================================================*/ /* Table: T1 */ /*==============================================================*/ create table T1 ( C1 char not null,

C3 char, C2 numeric(10) constraint PK_T1 primary key clustered (C1) ); insert into T1 (C1, C2) select C1, C2 from tmp_T1;

default autoincrement,

alter table T1 modify C2 constraint CKC_C2_T1 check (C2 is null or (C2 between 1 and 10)); Have a look at the last Alter table, we got here a modify C2 instead of Alter C2 add Constraint ... So even if Sybase AS Anywhere 9::Script\Objects\Column\AddColnChck has been modified, PD used Sybase AS Anywhere 9::Script\Objects\Column\ModifyColnChck which is wrong. ModifyColnChck should be only used when the constraint has been modified ======================================================================== Issue: 440185 08/22/06 Status: Closed 04/09/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Gene script Columns with Constraint outside table, wrong syntax with DBMS ASA Description : Wrong syntax is generated in database generate database for Column with constraint outside table Steps to reproduce New PDM : ASA 1 table T1, C1 PK C2 C2 properties check constraint Min :1 , max 10, autoincrement Preview with option column constraint outside create table T1 ( C1 char C2 numeric(10), constraint PK_T1 primary key clustered (C1) );

not null,

alter table T1 modify C2 constraint CKC_C2_T1 check (C2 is null or (C2 between 1 and 10)); Which is wrong, as the check constraint doesn't exist, an error will occur if you execute this script syntax should be create table T1 ( C1 char C3 char, C2 numeric(10) constraint PK_T1 primary key clustered (C1) );

not null, default autoincrement,

alter table T1 alter C2 add constraint CKC_C2_T1 check (C2 is null or (C2 between 1 and 10));

ASA documentation ALTER TABLE [ owner.]table-name { add-clause modify-clause drop-clause

rename-clause }

add-clause : ADD { column-definition table-constraint } { ADD PCTFREE integer PCTFREE DEFAULT } modify-clause : MODIFY column-definition MODIFY column-name { DEFAULT default-value [ NOT ] NULL [ CONSTRAINT constraint-name ] CHECK { NULL ( new-condition ) } } ALTER column-name column-modification ALTER constraint-name CHECK ( new-condition ) with column-modification : SET DEFAULT default-value DROP DEFAULT ADD [ CONSTRAINT column-constraint-name ] CHECK ( condition ) { DELETE DROP } CONSTRAINT column-constraint-name { DELETE DROP } CHECK SET COMPUTE ( expression ) DROP COMPUTE ======================================================================== Issue: 440177 08/21/06 Status: Closed 10/12/06 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Replica object name problem when there is colons in CDM Code Description : Description of Problem: Replica object full name cut off at the colon when the data item code contains colon. OS: Windows Versions and Build #s Reported: 12.0.0.1725 EBF 2 Versions and Build #s Tested: 12.1.0.1913 Database/Driver File/Version: Comments:

======================================================================== Issue: 440172 08/21/06 Status: Closed 09/01/06 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Select object doesn t show complex type either from same model or ano ther model Description : Description of Problem: Models with complex type, simple Content, and restriction in the Derivation field. 1.Restriction properties base type drop down isn t showing othe model s simple type nor complex type 2. Restriction properties select object only shows simple type of the models. OS: Windows XP Versions and Build #s Reported: 12.1.0.1913 Versions and Build #s Tested: 12.1.0.1913

Database/Driver File/Version: Comments: Related to CR 436213 ======================================================================== Issue: 440009 08/18/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : VBScript : GenerationCharacterCase Possible values don't follow the docume Description : According to the VBScript help, syntax for GenerationCharacterCase is ===================== Format option that specifies the case of objects in the script. Possible values are : lower case(0), upper case(1), mixed case(2). ====================== Those values are wrong from 12.1 version In PD 12 Lower : 0 Upper : 1 Mixed : 2 As described in the documentation From 12.1, values are Mixed : 0 Upper : 1 Lower : 2 ======================================================================== Issue: 438927 08/04/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Format of constraint expression for columns against informix is wrong Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------PDes 12.0/Informix 9.4 be able to customize format of constraint expression for columns For instance, PDes generates: ( col1 is null or col1 in ('A', 'B') ) Cust needs ((col1 IS NULL) or (col1 in ('A', 'B')) When At generation, I obtain: (COL_1 is null or (COL_1 in ("A","B"))) Doing Edit the current DBMS and select INFORMIX9::Script\\Objects\\Column\\DefineColnChck the value is [check (%.A:CONSTRAINT%) [constraint [%R%?[%QUALIFIER%]]%CONSTNAME%]] Unfortunately, %CONSTRAINT% is not customizable because hardcoded. So we would a need a new feature. But there is another related======================================================================== Issue here regarding the script at reverse... Informix stores it as : ((COL1 IS NULL) or (COL1 in ('A','B'))) It puts these extra parenthesis around the first check block.

When the database is reverse engineered, these constrainsts are not properly parsed so it is not displayed at the right place in PDes interface. The preview looks fine but the 2nd check argument has been moved to the Additional Checks tab as a server expression: (COL_1 is null) or (COL_1 in ("A","B")) and %MINMAX% and %LISTVAL% and %UPPER% and %LOWER% and %RULES% OS: XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PD12 Versions and Build #s Tested: PD 12, 12.1 Database/Driver File/Version: Informix. Comments:

======================================================================== Issue: 438809 08/03/06 Status: Closed 08/30/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Cannot modify database because the generation is aborted Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------Description of Problem: Every time the physical model is generated from the conceptual model, the check model delete the tables, why this is happening? Index seems to be corrupted, unchecking the Index Inclusion item in Check Model option, it works Ct wants to know also why his model became corrupted Merging the generated physical model is not an option, since the first time we did it that worked, and after a while, model had problems again. HE doesn't want to work with an unstable model. Ct wants that we investigate further the problem to be sure that the problem is the model and not PD 12. Could the chkmodel.xem be involved ? It had been modified for a previous case, related to unique contraint names. (see case 11203245). The log shows: 0 errors, several warnings Error: Generation aborted due to errors detected during the verification of the model. OS: XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PD12 Versions and Build #s Tested: PD 12, 12.1 Database/Driver File/Version: Not db specific. Comments: ======================================================================== Issue: 438742 08/02/06 Status: Closed 08/30/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : PK constraint name truncated to 8 characters during consolidation Description : *** Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:28:37 PM *** ahill *** 10.1.0 EBF12 & 12.1.0 \\neo\cir\...\438742

target DBMS = IBM UDB 7 OS/390 Primary key constraint name truncated to 8 characters during consolidation into an existing model. When a model is consolidated for the first time, the PK constraint column is consolidated correctly. After extracting and making a change to the PK contstraint, subsequent consolidations truncates the constraint to 8 characters. However, the maximum length set in the DBMS file for a constraint is 18. To reproduce: target DBMS: IBM UDB 7 OS/390 repro.pdm can be used for this======================================================================== Issue. 1) 2) 3) 4) Add a table, human resources, with several colums Create a PK with the name 'HmnRsrcs ID' Consolidate and extract the model Modify the PK constraint name changing it to 'P_HMNRSRCS_ID12345' 4a.[execute check model. note: no errors are generated] 5) Consolidate and extract the model using the update option Note: the results in the General tab - Updating the repository document... Modify Key "HmnRsrcs ID" in the Table "Human Resources" (Constraint Name ) "P_HMNRSRCS_ID12345" has been renamed to "P_H12345" The work around for this======================================================================== Issue is to copy the DBMS into the model instead of using a shared DBMS file. ======================================================================== Issue: 438704 08/02/06 Status: Closed 08/30/06 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Java sample not working when executed from Eclipse 3.1.1 Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------Description of Problem: Java sample CreateOOM.java ends up with error when executed from Eclipse 3.1.1 The debugger shows that it stops at CreateOOM.CreateAndDisplayOOM() at line 47. Error in getInstance() has raised: "Cannot create PowerDesigner application object. Please verify that PowerDesigner 12.1 or higher is installed." OS: XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PD12 Versions and Build #s Tested: PD 12, 12.1 Database/Driver File/Version: Not db specific. Comments: ======================================================================== Issue: 438493 07/31/06 Status: Closed 03/12/07 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : Repository update from 11 to 12 fails with error when installed on AS

E Description : *** Monday, July 31, 2006 10:21:14 AM *** ahill *** 12.0.0 & 12.1.0 \\neo\cir\...\438493 Repository update from 11 to 12 fails with error on Sybase ASE The customer is upgrading from PD 11.0.0 <no ebfs> to 12.0.0. During the upgrade, they get the following error message: Msg 207, Level 16, State 4 Server 'SYBDEV32', Line 1 Invalid column name 'OTYP'. In testing, this======================================================================== Issue has been reproduced when the repository is installed on ASE. For my tests, I used ASE 12.5.4. To reproduce: Repository DBMS = ASE 12.5.4 1) 2) 3) 4) Create a repository on Updated the repository Updated the repository In the generation log, PD 10.1.0 EBF12 to 11.0.0 GA to 12.1.0 GA search for ODBC, it will bring you to the error.

*** Executing statement 2429: update PMPDMVIEW set TTYP=(select pt.TDAT from PMTEXT pt where pt.TXID=OTYP) [DataDirect][ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver][SQL Server]Invalid column name 'OTYP'. SQLSTATE = S0022 NOTE: In testing, the same update statement is generated for a repository on ASA. During the update of the repository, this error is not generated. However, if the select statement is run via isql, an error is generated stating that the column 'OTYP' does not exist. ======================================================================== Issue: 438237 07/27/06 Status: Closed 04/10/07 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Column check constraints reversed incorrectly for Informix by ODBC Description : PD 12 and PD 12.1 Informix 9 I know than cr 273671 already exists and has been closed as not a bug but this new customer gave us some SQL to RE contraintes on the columns. Steps to reproduce Against a server informix 9, execute the following script create table T1_C ( TC11 CHAR not null, TC12 CHAR, TC13 CHAR ); alter table T1_C

add constraint check (TC12 in ("J","N")) Constraint CKC_TC12_T1_C; alter table T1_C add constraint check (TC13 in ("J","N")) constraint CKC_TC13_T1_C; create unique index TABLE_1_PK on T1_C ( TC11 ASC ); alter table T1_C add constraint primary key (TC11) constraint PK_T1_C;

For sure the constraint look like it was constraints on tables. From PD, RE by ODBC Constraint will be RE for table and not anymore for columns Against a server informix 9, execute the following SQL Select c.constrname, t.tabname from "informix".sysconstraints c, "informix".systables t where c.tabid = t.tabid and c.constrname = "ckc_tc12_t1_c" Got the table name Execute now the following sql (sent by ct) select t.tabname, c.colname, s.constrname, d.constrid from syscolumns c, systables t, sysconstraints s, syscoldepend d where s.constrid = d.constrid and d.colno = c.colno and d.tabid = c.tabid and c.tabid = t.tabid and s.constrtype = 'C' and 1 = (select count(*) from syscoldepend d2 where s.constrid = d2.constrid) Here we got the table name, the column name and the constraint name So according to ct This one gets all simple one column check constraints: select t.tabname, c.colname, s.constrname, d.constrid from syscolumns c, systables t, sysconstraints s, syscoldepend d where s.constrid = d.constrid

and d.colno = c.colno and d.tabid = c.tabid and c.tabid = t.tabid and s.constrtype = 'C' and 1 = (select count(*) from syscoldepend d2 where s.constrid = d2.constrid) This one would get multi-column-check-constraints: select t.tabname, c.colname, s.constrname, d.constrid from syscolumns c, systables t, sysconstraints s, syscoldepend d where s.constrid = d.constrid and d.colno = c.colno and d.tabid = c.tabid and c.tabid = t.tabid and s.constrtype = 'C' and 1 < (select count(*) from syscoldepend d2 where s.constrid = d2.constrid) This one would get table constraints: select t.tabname, s.constrname from systables t, sysconstraints s where s.tabid = t.tabid and s.constrtype = 'T' Due to this error, when doing a modify database, changes have been detected on the constraints and we should not get some changes Note : When doing column --> Properties --> Standard check, add some values Generation options, column --> Constraints outside preview the script create table TABLE_1 ( COLUMN_1 CHAR, COLUMN_2 CHAR ); alter table TABLE_1 add COLUMN_1 CHAR check (COLUMN_1 is null or (COLUMN_1 in ("J","N"))) constraint CKC_COLUMN_1_TABLE; Columns are created twice, once in the create table and once in the alter table ======================================================================== Issue: 438229 07/27/06 Status: Closed 02/14/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Deferred option of FK constraint is not RE for some references Description : PD 12 and PD 12.1 XDB : Oracle 10G RE into a new PDM the following script (Note the brackets for each constraint.) create table test1 ( a varchar(20) not null,

b varchar(20), CONSTRAINT test1_pk PRIMARY KEY (a)) / create table test2 ( c varchar(20) not null, a varchar(20) not null, CONSTRAINT test2_pk PRIMARY KEY (c)) / create table test3 ( d varchar(20) not null, a varchar(20), CONSTRAINT test3_pk PRIMARY KEY (d)) / CREATE INDEX test2_IDX02 ON test2 (a) LOGGING NOPARALLEL / CREATE INDEX test3_IDX02 ON test3 (a) LOGGING NOPARALLEL / alter table test2 add (CONSTRAINT TEST2_TEST1_FK FOREIGN KEY (A) REFERENCES TEST1 (A) initially immediate deferrable) / alter table test3 add (CONSTRAINT TEST3_TEST1_FK FOREIGN KEY (A) REFERENCES TEST1 (A) ON DELETE CASCADE initially immediate deferrable) /

Go to check each reference RE Reference properties --> Tab Oracle only one has Defered option completed ======================================================================== Issue: 437524 07/20/06 Status: Closed 03/12/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : can not open model when user has inappropriate right on attached XEM. Description : PD 11.1, PD 12 and PD 12.1 beta broken When user has inappropriate right on attached XEM, instead to have no access to the xem and get a warning message, you can't open any models even if the user has full control on other xem and after that you can not create any new model In Debug mode, I got Src\sbbrowser.cpp : Browser view Double click and nothing else.

In output Error: Could not find <o:FormTargetItem> in DTD or matching class, the contents of all <o:FormTargetItem> markups will be ignored! Steps to reproduce You should be logged as Administrator or your machine Create a new folder : My_folder New Model, add 2 xems, xem_1 and xem_2 save model and xems into my_folder exit PD Via Tools --> Ressources, modify xem path in order to go by default on my_folder On your machine, create a new user From explorer, Right click XEM_1 --> properties --> Security tab --> Button advanced Unchecked inherit from parent the permission and click remove Click the button Add Click the button Location and select your machine In Enter the object name location, type my_user and click check name (to be sure) Select full control for this user and nothing else You has to be sure than only this user can access to this xem XEM_2, do the same thing but this time, only the admin will have the full control on the xem To resume XEM_1 : full control for my_user XEM_2 : full control for admin be sure that "everyone" user has no permisssion You should be logged as admin on your machine Run PD, open the pdm saved before In debug mode, got error message Src\sbbrowser.cpp : Browser view Double click and nothing else. In output Error: Could not find <o:FormTargetItem> in DTD or matching class, the contents of all <o:FormTargetItem> markups will be ignored! The model is not opened, you can not create new model Modify the path for the xem has fixed the problem ======================================================================== Issue: 436952 07/13/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Physical Options: unable to delete options from the Items tab Description : *** Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:36:25 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0.1908 Physical Options: Unable to delete options from the Items tab To reproduce: Target DBMS: MS SQL Server 2005 1) Add a table with several columns and create an index 2) Goto the Physical Options tab of the index 3) Add the 'on' option branch to the Items tab 4) In the Items tab, expand the options and remove the 'partition scheme' option. 5) Apply the changes and close the table properties window. 6) Open the Index properties and go to physical options Note: The 'partition scheme' option is still listed on the Items tab.

If you delete the column option and then delete the partition scheme option, the options are removed, but '?' place holders for the options still appear in the SQL. To remove them, you must define the filegroup option a second time. ======================================================================== Issue: 436915 07/13/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Physical Options: From List of... unable to select/deselect options w /check box Description : *** Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:08:36 PM *** ahill *** 12.1.0.1908 \\neo\cir\...\436915 Physical Options: From List of... unable to select/deselect options with check box. Options with ddlb or sle are able to be set. Via the List of Indexes, the customer is trying to modify physical options. Specifically, they were trying to change pad_index, fillfactor, and filegroup. They are able to change fillfactor and filegroup, but when trying to select pad_index or any option with a check box, the change is not allowed. To reproduce: 1) Open sample model 2) Select List of Indexes 3) Try to select any physical option that has a check box ======================================================================== Issue: 436700 07/12/06 Status: Closed 09/01/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Add column comment syntax fails with error for MS SQL Server 2005 Description : *** Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:56:06 AM *** ahill *** 12.1.0.1907 \\neo\cir\...\436694 Add column comment syntax fails with error for MS SQL Server 2005 *** Executing statement 15: execute sp_addextendedproperty 'MS_Description', 'Use this field for storing RangeOfValue, Multiple Choice, and PriorityList answers.', 'user', '', 'table', 'ANSWER', 'column', 'UserAnswerText' *** Execution of statement failed: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Object is invalid. Extended properties are not permitted on 'ANSWER.UserAnswerText', or the object does not exist. SQLSTATE = 37000 To reproduce: Generate customer's model to the database. Comments are located on the 'Answer' and 'ObjectClass' tables ======================================================================== Issue: 436694 07/12/06 Status: Closed 09/21/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Create Index syntax w/options invalid for MS SQL Svr 2005 Description : *** Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:43:02 AM *** ahill *** 12.1.0 build 190 7

\\neo\cir\...\436694 Syntax generated for 'create index' is invalid for MS SQL Server 2005 when physical options are included. PD generates the following syntax: create index REFERENCE_2_FK on ANSWEROBJECTCLASS ( AnswerID ASC ) with fillfactor= 80, pad_index= on on "DEFAULT" When this is executed via ODBC, the following error occurs: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be prepared. SQLSTATE = 37000 To correct this======================================================================== Issue, the physical options must be placed in parenthesis create index REFERENCE_2_FK on ANSWEROBJECTCLASS ( AnswerID ASC ) with (fillfactor= 80, pad_index= on) on "DEFAULT" Comment from customer: In addition, there's a note in the SQL Server 2005 Documentation about backward compatibility in the relational index, as follows: "Important The backward compatible relational index syntax structure will be removed in a future version of SQL Server. Avoid using this syntax structure in new development work, and plan to modify applications that currently use the feature. Use the syntax structure specified in <relational_index_option> instead." ======================================================================== Issue: 435073 06/26/06 Status: Closed 08/29/06 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : Eng Consult: set NO4 datatype translation to smallint identity specif ically Description : Tested and reproduced in PD 12.0 We have a customer that migrated from PD 6.x to PD 12.0 EBF#2 and is using MS SQL Server 2000 as DBMS. In old PD 6.0, when customer wanted to tell PowerDesigner CDMs that NO4 datatype, which is serial(4), should be converted into smallint identity when creating a PDM from this CDM, he entered the DBMS .def file and added the following line under the data type translation table:

NO4 = smallint <---- added this line NO = numeric NO%n = numeric(%n) After that, when creating PDM from CDM, automatically PD transformed specifics NO4 to smallint identity. We tried to do the same in PD 12.0 but apparently we couldn't get the same behavior. We opened PD 12.0 and edited MS SQL Server DBMS at MSSQLSRV2000::Script\DataType\AmcdDataType Then. we inserted a NO4 and smallint in respective columns. But when generating PDM, PD still assumes numeric(%n) by reading the NO%n column. As a result a numeric(%n) identity column is created in PDM. Is there a respective way to have PD 12.0 do the same as PD 6.0? Or is there other ways to tell PD 12.0 to create "smallint identity" specifically when encountering NO4 from CDM to PDM translation? Thanks in advance for your attention. ======================================================================== Issue: 433194 06/06/06 Status: Closed 01/18/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Add import support for the new file format from AllFusion ERwin Data Modeler r7 Description : *** Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:19:58 PM *** ahill *** 12.0.0 EBF3 Add import support for the new file format from AllFusion ERwin Data Modeler r7.

======================================================================== Issue: 430400 05/09/06 Status: Closed 02/09/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Support of Eclipse 3.2 Description : Customer is requesting to have an Eclipse 3.2 plugin from end 2006

======================================================================== Issue: 429882 05/02/06 Status: Closed 04/25/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Changes to "Generate" option on references ignored during PDM to PDM generation Description : *** Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:43:59 PM *** ahill *** 10.1.0 EBF12, 11.1.0 EBf7, 12.0.0, 12.1.0 1841 Changes to the 'Generate' option is ignored on references when generating PDM to

PDM using the Preserve Modification option. The customer reproted the problem <logical> to Oracle, but the DBMS type does not seem to matter. customer description of the problem: Between the <Logical> and a generated DBMS-specific PDM, if the only change you make is to the "Generate" checkbox on a reference, PD just doesn't see that difference. If you change other things in a reference, those things are seen, but "Generate" isn't in the Merge. You have to do extreme things like delete the reference in the target model to force the "Generate" checkbox to be migrated. This bug exists in all versions from V10. how to reproduce: create a logical PDM with two tables with a primary key for each. create a reference between the two tables. generate a PDM for oracle. the PDM is generated. now go back to the logical PDM open the reference properties panel. uncheck the "generate" checkbox in the general tab. merge the change to oracle result: the merge window does not show any change and then nothing is merged. now delete the reference from the oracle PDM go back to the logical PDM and do a merge. check in the merge window that the reference should be added result: the reference is back and the "generate" checkbox is unchecked! ======================================================================== Issue: 422303 02/26/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 1 Est. release: tyresias Label : PD12 XML Model "shortcut" element refer namespace's element miss Mapp ing Tab Description : ----------------------PSE NOTES: ----------------------Description of Problem: In XML model of PD10, "shortcut" items (element, attribute), which reference a Namespace's item , is still allow to map to OOM or PDM item. However, in XML model of PD12, the "Mapping" Tab of items will disappear as long as it become a "shortcut" by defining the "reference" property. OS: Win XP Versions and Build #s Reported: PowerDesigner 12.0 GA bld 1700 Versions and Build #s Tested: PowerDesigner 12.0 GA bld 1700 Database/Driver File/Version: not related. ======================================================================== Issue: 422053 02/23/06 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : Error message : Column cannot be null when using union all Description :

PD 11.1 and PD 12 DBMS : DB2 CS V8 When you delete a view column into SQL query Statement which contains an Union All, the view columns name is well deleted but not the row. Steps to reproduce DBMS : DB2 CS V8 New view View --> Properties --> Sql Query type here Select C1 A , C2 B , C3 C , C4 D From T1 Apply Go tot View columns : result OK Return to SQL Query and select all the statement and delete it, Apply return to View columns : Result is OK New view View --> Properties --> Sql Query type here Select C1 A , C2 B , C3 C , C4 D From T1 Union All Select C1 A , C2 B , C3 C , C4 D From T2 Apply Check View columns Result OK Return to SQL Query and select all the statement and delete it, Apply return to View Columns There is no name anymore but have a look we still have 4 rows in the list. Click SQl Query tab error message : Name cannot be null. This problem occurs also when you delete only one columns in the SQL Query statement ======================================================================== Issue: 420773 02/09/06 Status: Closed 04/09/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : DB2 OS/390- decimal / dec data type flagged as different due to PhysO dbcDataType Description : *** Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:33:37 PM *** ahill *** 11.1.0 & 12.0. 0 As part of CR 268368, a space was inserted before the '%p' variable for the Decimal data type. Decimal(%s,%p) was changed to Decimal(%s, %p). As a result of this change, when the customer reverse engineers via ODBC into an existing model, Decimal data types are being flagged as different when a Dec data type exists in the model. To correct this========================================================================

Issue: 1) Create a copy of the default DB2 7 OS/390 DBMS file 2) Change line 4 of the script\data type\PhysOdbcDataType category DEC(%s,%p) = DECIMAL(%s,%p) becomes DEC(%s, %p) = DECIMAL(%s, %p) (A space is inserted before '%p' for both items.)

======================================================================== Issue: 419266 01/24/06 Status: Closed 09/07/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : List report : mapping is missing Description : *** mardi 24 janvier 2006 13:41:38 *** vaudino ***12.0 GA in list report wizard or list report prop sheet on PDM, in object combo, mapping object is missing no way to create a list report on mapping although a list is available in report items

======================================================================== Issue: 408977 11/04/05 Status: Closed 04/17/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : The case on subobjects is not updated properly when using copy/paste Description : *** Friday, November 04, 2005 4:29:04 PM *** ahill *** 11.1.0 EBF6 When using copy/paste between models with different cases set for the naming conventions, the case is not updated for subobjects (columns, attributes...) I have the following scenario: Two PDMs with codes being displayed by default In PDM_1, the case for columns is set to lower-case In PDM_2, the case for columns is set to UPPERCASE Create a table_1 in PDM_1 with several columns Copy & paste table_1 into PDM_2 Note: the columns remain lower-case Modify a column Note: the column code is now changed to UPPERCASE *** Friday, November 04, 2005 4:29:05 PM *** mledier *** This is an old======================================================================== Issue (not a beta bug) for which you can enter a new CR. The problem only occurs with subobjects (columns, attributes...) A really simple vbscript that fix it would be << dim t, c for each t in ActiveModel.Tables for each c in t.Columns

c.SetNameAndCode c.Name, c.Code next next >> ======================================================================== Issue: 379761 02/10/05 Status: Closed 03/27/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : "Compare Text Property Values" window does not show carriage return Description : Reproduced also with procedures Was working fine with 9.5.1 version New behaviour from 10 version *** 12 December 2005 10:21:54 *** mtinevez *** The "Compare Text property value" window does not show carriage returns in the body of trigger syntax. Tested and reproduced with PD 11.0_1363 Customer would like to be able to see the carriage returns correctly in "Compare Text Property Values" window. Today, the entire trigger syntax shows everything in a single line. ======================================================================== Issue: 369569 10/19/04 Status: Closed 03/27/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Reverse trigger : a difference has been detected in the merge window Description : PD version : PD 10, 10.1 and 11 build 1355 DBMS : reproduced with Oracle, ASE RE a trigger inside an existing PDM, without doing nothing a difference is detected for each trigger Text value Problem occurs during a RE by script and by ODBC, Steps to reproduce New PDM 2 tables T1 and T2 Few column in each table with PK Reference between the 2 tables with integrity implementation sets to Trigger Rebuilt triggers Generate a trigger script Without doing nothing Re the trigger script In Merge window, a difference has been detected on each trigger Workaround Menu database edit current DBMS Tab Trigger templates For each template, delete the first line : the comment line Note If the first line is replaced by an empty line, a difference will be detected on the text property but if you check the compare text property values, you will get no difference !!!! ======================================================================== Issue: 365841 09/02/04 Status: Closed 05/02/07

Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : PDM Model options, trigger section text should be Automatically rebui ld triggers Description : *** Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:47:46 PM *** ahill *** build 1317 In the PDM Model options, text for the trigger section under Table & View reads... Rebuild automatically triggers This should read 'Automatically rebuild triggers'

======================================================================== Issue: 365394 08/28/04 Status: Closed 05/02/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : CDM/PDM generation extended depency link moves to forefront of attach ed objects Description : *** Saturday, August 28, 2004 7:48:50 AM *** ahill *** 10.1.0 When generating from a CDM to a PDM, the link line of an extended dependency moves to the forefront of the attached objects in the PDM. To reproduce: 1) Add an entity with an attribute 2) Add a Note with some text 3) Add an extended dependency drawn from the note to the entity Note: Default is to have link in sent to back 4) Generate the PDM Note: The link has now brought to the front of the attached objects ======================================================================== Issue: 347274 02/23/04 Status: Closed 11/16/06 Severity : 2 Est. release: tyresias Label : when using drag/drop in ordered lists, the incorrect rows are moved Description : *** Monday, February 23, 2004 10:31:23 PM *** ahill *** 10.0.0 EBF1 & 9.5.2 EBF6 Arranging items on an ordered list using drag n' drop doesn't move some of the selected items (columns in a table). When multiple columns are moved, the last listed column is not moved. The column preceding the first listed column is moved instead. Also, for each column selected, the graphic shows an additional column being moved until you close the property table property window. To reproduce: 1) Create a table with 9 columns, 1-9 2) Select columns 8 & 9 and drag them to the first column position Note: In the graphical display, it shows that columns 5, 6, 7, and 8 have been moved. 3) Click OK Note: Columns 7 and 8 have been moved eventhough columns 8 and 9 were originally selected.

(If more columns are selected, the behavior becomes more erratic.) Workaround is to use the navigation arrows to move the columns. ======================================================================== Issue: 317414 04/28/03 Status: Closed 05/02/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : Add option to Find Data item in Browser from the entity attribute pro perties Description : *** Monday, April 28, 2003 10:42:20 AM *** ahill *** 9.5.2.873 Add a new option to "Find the Data item in the Browser" from the Entity Attribute property window. Currently, the entity attribute can be found using the "Find in Browser" (Ctrl+Shift+B) option. The customer is requesting this functionality because extended attributes can only be associated through the Data Item metaclass. If they desire to review this information, you must either manually find the Data Item in the browser or in the list of Data Items and then open the properties of the Data Item. ======================================================================== Issue: 288037 06/19/02 Status: Closed 05/06/07 Severity : 3 Est. release: tyresias Label : Generate Database: Foreign keys dropped without checking if they exis t Description : *** 6/19/2002 AHILL*** 9.0.0 EBF3 and Atlas beta MS SQL SERVER family of DBMS When executing generate database with the drop foreign key option selected, PowerDesigner generates DDL to drop the foreign keys without first checking to see if the foreign key constraint already exists in the database. As a result, many warning/error messages are generated by SQL Server when the DDL is executed. As a work-around, I added the following section from the drop table statement to the drop reference section: if exists (select from where and 1 sysobjects id = object_id('[%QUALIFIER%]%TABLE%') type = 'U')

======================================================================== Issue: 256751 08/09/01 Status: Closed 05/02/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : When zoomed in all the way the screen no longer scrolls or eventually stops scro Description : In model graphics, Zoomed in all the way (F6 key) the screen no longer scrolls or eventually stops scrolling using Arrow keys on Keyboard as well as using mouse wheel. You must back off/zoom out (F7 key) at least one degree to get scrolling to work again. **** Thu Aug 09 14:17:58 EDT 2001 *** mbartrum **** tested in 7.5.0.826; 8.0.1.275 ; 9.0.0.399 BETA1 with the same results... **** Thu Sep 26 09:33:01 EDT 2002 *** mbartrum ****

Tested in v. 9.5.0.655 (ebf1) with the same results.

======================================================================== Issue: 230876 01/09/01 Status: Closed 05/02/07 Severity : 4 Est. release: tyresias Label : OOM generation fails if the directory does not already exist. Description : **** Tue Jan 09 14:59:44 EST 2001 *** ahill **** build 169 & 7.5.0.826 When trying to generate an OOM into a directory that does not exist, fails with an error message. The customer reported this with VB 6 as the language, but the same behavior exists when Java is the target language. To reproduce: 1) Create an OOM that contains Class 1, and Class 2. Add several attributes to each Class and draw an association from Class 1 to Class 2 2) Select ..Language>Generate Java Code 3) Type in a directory name that does not already exist 4) Click OK Note: The generation process ends with the following error: "Disk full or read only! Generation aborted" This is similar to CR# 195341 (109 rows affected)