You are on page 1of 3

o$.b(!

ry
Hackensack, New Jersey 07602-0800 ol<S"J?,.r
(201) 489-3000
and-
TH.ELA W 0FFJCES OF RICHARD 1\fALA<;IERE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
14 Bergen Street- 1st. Floor
New Jersey 07601
Attorneys for the Plaintiff LuganeHa Property
FOLED
Nav,a 220o7
P.r E. Ooyne, P.J.S.C.
_____ _
LAGANELLA PROPERTY I SUPERIOR COURT OF NE\V JERSEY
LLC. a .N:w . l DIVIS.ION: BERGHN
mmtec ltab1hty company, m 1ts capacay as COlJNTY
a limited partuer
1
and on behalf of JERSEY ! DOCKET NO. J 4-06
INVESTORS GRO\VTH CO., a New I
Je:sey limited partnership} and aJt other I Ci:til ..
limited partners similarly situated, I
Plaintiff
v
ROBERT S. HEKEwfiAN, DONALD W.
BAF,NEY and SA\1UEL HEKEMlAN,
individually and in their respective
capacities as general partners of JBRSEV
INVESTORS GROWTH CO., a :.few
Jersey limited partnership, HEKEMIA?\
AND {}:C.: a Nevv Jersey
Corporation,
Defendants.
I
I
This natter being opened to the Court by 'Il1e Ltnv Otl1ces of Richard ivialagier::\
P.C. (Rjchard Malagiere. Esq. appearing). attorneys for plaimift: Langane!Ja Property
Management, LLC, on notice hJ and in the presence of Schiffrnan, Abraham! Kaufman &
Ritter, attorneys for defendants, Robert S. Hekemian, Sr. and Hekemia:n
Company (Robert Ritter, Esq. appearing) and Newman & Simpso:1, LLP, attorneys
def'ndants, Samuel Hekemian, Donald W. Barney, and Jersey Investors Growth} Inc.
(Daniel Simpson, Esq., appearing), and on notice to Banta, Hetherington,
BaraHan & P.C., on behalf of Joseph L Basralian, Esq., and it appearing that the
deposition of JQseph L. Basralian, Esq. was taken on August 17, 2007 and objections
were made based on the attorney-client privilege and lvfr. Basralian was directed by
counsel not to questions on this basis, and the Court having the papers
submitted in support and in opposition and having considered the oral argument
of com1sel, and having rendered a written decision on October 26, 2007y and for good
cause shown:
ltis on this __b.Y'Id _day of ,Aicve..,hl' r 2007
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to compel the deposition of Joseph
Esq. is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that defendant's motion for a protective Order is denied; and it is
further
ORDERED that Joseph L. Basralian, Esq. shall submit to a further deposition by
ntJ later than November 9, 2007 at which time he shall answer questions regarding
C\.)nversmions conceming transfers of Block 19.01, Lot 11 (60 1v1ain Street) and 12 (56
.Main Street) in the Township of Sparta, \.vhy these transfers were made, who requeste-d
the what was the concept behind the transfers, and whether there are other
documents relevant to the transfers; and it is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a copy of this Order be served ur,on aU
parties within seven (7) days ofth:e date hereo.f.
( ~
( ) unopposed

You might also like