2-8-12 Sharon Steward Office of Executive Inspector General 607 East Adams 14th Floor Springfield, IL

Dear Inspector General Steward, I am contacting you to bring before you a most serious and egregious ethics complaint related to an objection petition I brought before the IL State BOE Feb 2, 2012 regarding the ballot eligibility of Candidate Barack Obama. I and the State of Illinois are entitled a fair and impartial hearing. This complaint I am filing involves Spoliation of Evidence, Violation of the General Rules of Procedure and Intimidation on the part of the BOE. I as well, had my guaranteed rights afforded me in the IL Constitution violated, specifically Article I Section 1,2,4, and 5. May I also bring to your attention that the BOE has sworn an oath before God to support both the IL and U.S. Constitution (10 ILCS 5/1-2.1). The following people are being named in this complaint: (BOE Commission) Chairman William McGuffage, Vice Chair Jesse Smart, Harold Byers, Betty Coffrin, Ernest Gowen, Judith Rice, Bryan Schneider, Charles Sholz; Dep. Gen. Legal Counsel Ken Menzel, Gen Counsel Steve Sandvoss, Asst. Legal Counsel Bernadette Harrington, Sue Klos; Hearing Examiner Jim Tenuto; Candidate Counsel Michael Kreloff and Michael Kasper. The spoliation of evidence is a term often used during the process of discovery. Spoliation of evidence happens when a document or information that is required for discovery is destroyed or altered significantly. If a person negligently or intentionally withholds or destroys relevant information that will be required in an action, is liable for spoliation of evidence. Spoliation of evidence is an act that is prohibited by American Bar Associations Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 37 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Title 18 United States Code. Sanctions for spoliation are preventative, punitive and remedial in nature. I will share with you a basic timeline of when I submitted evidence, legal documents and exhibits in a timely fashion and such evidentiary information was suppressed from the public and not put on the record and consequently not considered in the Boards adjudication of my complaint. Not only were such acts committed, there was a violation of the General Rules and Procedures by the BOE, adopted as recent as Jan 24th, 2012 which(oddly) happened to be on the day I met at the IL State BOE to speak with the Hearing Officer Jim Tenuto (emphasis added). The evidence and documents I submitted to the Hearing Examiner will be provided in the attachments with this submission I bring before you. Those documents were in good faith provided to all the afore mentioned in this complaint. The timeline of such submissions are as follows: My objection petition (Mr. Romney-- withdrawn 1-23-12 & Mr. Obama) time and date stamped 1-13-12; My Motion to Oppose 1-26-12; Exhibit to the Motion (Amicus Brief on Natural Born Citizen) 1-26-12; Exception To Hearing Examiners Recommendation with Exhibits 1-31-12; A 2nd Exception To BOEs Recommendation To Dismiss on 2-3-12 was submitted asking for an immediate rehearing of the case due to what appears to be a hiding from public record the previous Exception and other Exhibits and evidentiary documents.

Though these documents which include the U.S. Supreme Court ruling Minor V. Happersett (1875), an Amicus Brief, and evidentiary exhibits were sent and confirmed to have been received, they appear to have been expunged and spoliated from the public record and this is evidenced in the final Recommendation To The BOE To Dismiss, as well, as in the transcript record, that is provided. The Minor V. Happersett (1875) ruling and the Amicus Brief help to define and support the Constitutional requirement an individual seeking office of POTUS must be a Natural Born Citizen. Furthermore, the BOE has General Rules of Procedure in which they are to follow and some of those rules have been conveniently ignored. Some of those General Rules which were violated are as follows: AppearanceThe candidate or objector may appear on his or her own behalf and participate in any proceeding before the Board. Authority of the BoardThe Board itself or through its duly appointed hearing examiner if applicable shall conduct all hearings and take all necessary action to avoid delay, to maintain order, to ensure compliance with all notice requirements, and to ensure the development of a clear and complete record. The Board or its designated hearing examiner shall have all powers necessary to conduct a fair and impartial hearing including, but not limited to d) Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence; i) Consider such competent and relevant evidence as may be submitted, including, but not limited to, documentary evidence, affidavits, and oral testimony (emphasis added). Hearing ExaminersIn addition, any hearing examiner appointed by the Board is authorized and directed; a) to hold a full hearing and receive all evidence and argument. In cases where a hearing examiner is appointed, the Board shall not issue a final decision until a proposal for decision submitted by the hearing examiner is served upon the parties and an opportunity is afforded each party to take exceptions , whether written or oral, and, if the Board so permits, oral argument before the Board. The Board will make a final ruling on the objection and may consider the following as part of its consideration and appraisal of the record: the petition and the objection thereto, the hearing transcript, the hearing examiners outline, recommendations and proposal for decision, and any exceptions, briefs, exhibits, offers of proof or arguments presented by the parties (emphasis added). EvidenceEvidence will be heard by the Board or the duly appointed hearing examiner as may be submitted, including, but not limited to documentary evidence, depositions, affidavits, and oral testimony (emphasis added). ArgumentAll arguments and evidence must be confined to the points raised by the objectors petition and objections, if any, to the objectors petition. The Board reserves the right to limit oral arguments in any particular case and will ordinarily allow not more than ten minutes per side per argument.

The proper and timely submitted evidence and exhibits provided to the BOE and opposition were never given the opportunity to be presented on the public record, whether in written or oral form, evidenced in the final written decision rendered by the BOE and in the hearing transcript. According to statute

(10ILCS 5/10-8) any legal voter who has objections to any certificate of nomination or nomination papers or petitions filed, shall file an objectors petition, thus meeting the requirement of my voter interest according to such said statute. Furthermore, pursuant to (10ILCS 5/10-5), the candidate being first duly swornthat I am legally qualified to hold such an office is to affirm they are legally qualified as such requirements would be according to our supreme legal document the U.S. Constitution and Article II Section I Clause V, which the BOE swore an oath to support (10 ILCS 5/1-2.1). In addition to these complaints, I strongly submit that Chairman McGuffage used intimidation to cause fear in pursuing my statutory right to file an appeal to the Circuit Court with threatened sanctions and as a person of little financial resources, were made afraid and harmed in becoming financially dependent upon others if such said sanctions were imposed upon me. Such intimidation and tone is evident by just reading the transcript: CHAIRMAN McGUFFAGE: No. No. This matter is -- it's a birther objection. These types of objections are not relevant under state statute and we don't need to hear anymore about this. In fact, we're getting sick and tired of having these objections filed every couple of years, and they have no basis in fact or law. If such an objection was brought before a court of law, there would be sanctions imposed. Okay. So I don't see any reason to hear any testimony from the objector. It is apparent to the objective mind and those who desire liberty, that ALL laws, rules and procedures be adhered to no matter who the persons name may be on the ballot and that fair, equal, and impartial hearings are conducted. By virtue of not allowing multiple evidentiary documents to be brought before the public, I as well as we the people of the State of IL have not been afforded a fair, impartial and equal hearing on the facts. This is an infringement upon my guaranteed U.S. Constitutional rights in the 14th Amendment Section 1 that states no State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,(my ballot) without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws as stated so in my original petition. Furthermore, though not exhaustive, my IL Constitutional rights were infringed upon, namely Article I Section 1, 2, 4, and 5. It needs to be reminded that in Article I Section 1 of the IL Constitution the governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed (emphasis added). In conclusion it is imperative and demanded by I and we the people of the State of IL, that this Executive Office of the Inspector General call for an immediate rehearing of this objection. As well, not only the reconvening, but the reconvening of newly appointed BOE officials body to conduct a fair and impartial hearing of this matter on whether candidate is legally qualified to hold such an office as POTUS by virtue of being a Natural Born Citizen according to Article II Section I Clause V of our still legal and lawful U.S. Constitution, holding binding precedent with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Minor V. Happersett 1875. We are a nation of laws and these laws help provide and protect our individual liberties. If we thus no longer are a nation of laws we become a nation of men who dont seek to enforce and obey the law, but become political activists making and adjudicating law for the sake of monetary and political expediency. I beseech and implore you Inspector General Steward to call for an emergency rehearing regarding this matter as the truth matters, the Constitution matters.

Respectfully, /s/ Michael Jackson 2-8-12

STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS STATE OF ILLINOIS

1020 South Spring Street, P.O. Box 4187 Springfield, Illinois 62708 217/782-4141 TTY:217/782-1518 Fax: 217/782-5959 James R. Thompson Center 100 West Randolph, Suite 14-100 Chicago, Illinois 60601 312/814-6440 TTY: 312/814-6431 Fax: 312/814-6485 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Rupert T. Borgsmiller BOARD MEMBERS William M. McGuffage, Chairman Jesse R. Smart, Vice Chairman Harold D. Byers Betty J. Coffrin Ernest L. Gowen Judith C. Rice Bryan A. Schneider Charles W. Scholz

PUBLIC NOTICE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and STATE OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD MEETING
The Illinois State Board of Elections will conduct a SPECIAL Board Meeting on Thursday, February 2, 2012. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. in the Boards conference room 14-100 in the James R. Thompson Center, 100 W. Randolph Street, Chicago, IL and via video conference at the Boards principal office located at 1020 S. Spring St., Springfield, IL. Admittance to the 14th floor of the Thompson Center requires security screening and production of a government issued identification. The State Board of Elections will convene to consider the candidate withdrawal of Alan Nudo - 52nd Senate District following certification. The State Officers Electoral Board will also consider the following objections to candidate nominating petitions for the March 20, 2012 General Primary Election: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) Brimm v. Newman, 12SOEBGP102; Freeman v. Obama, 12SOEBGP103; Jackson v. Obama, 12SOEBGP104; Petzel v. Ritter, 12SOEBGP522; Rodriguez v. Rutagawibira, 12SOEBGP523; Coyle/Bigger v. Miller, 12SOEBGP524; Schaeflin/Brezinski v. Cunningham, 12SOEBGP525; Billerman/Pettlon v. Harris, 12SOEBGP526; Cunningham v. Biggert, 12SOEBGP527; Cunningham v. Harris, 12SOEBGP528; Sutton v. Baker, et al,. 12SOEBGP501.

The State Officers Electoral Board will also consider objections wherein the objection was withdrawn in the matter of Meroni, et al. v. Obama 12SOEBGP500. The State Officers Electoral Board will recess to the State Board of Elections and may address other matters as needed and/or recess into executive session to consider litigation and/or personnel matters.

DATED: January 31, 2012 Rupert T. Borgsmiller, Executive Director

www.elections.il.gov

BEFORE THE DULY CONSTITUTED ELECTORAL BOARD FOR THE HEARING OF AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS TO THE NOMINATION PAPERS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE MATTER OF THE OBJECTIONS OF MICHAEL JACKSON TO THE NOMINATION PAPERS OF BARACK OBAMA AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE NOMINATION TO THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE VOTED UPON AT THE MARCH 20, 2012 ELECTIONS.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12SOEBGP104

OBJECTORS EXCEPTION TO RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER

DATED JANUARY 27, 2012 NOW COMES Objector Michael Jackson, self-represented, and moves to take Exception to Hearing Examiners Recommendation dated January 27, 2012. Regarding RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER takes Exception to the following:

1.

OBJECTOR CONTESTS PARAGRAPH 9 AND 10

Paragraph 9 and 10 are incorrect. Objector did in good faith file a response as proven by Number 10 which is Exhibit 1 of Objectors Opposition to Candidates Motion to Strike and Dismiss Objectors Petition, which Hearing Examiner Tenuto admitted to receiving before the deadline. Due to Objectors error in sending the email to the Examiner and opposing council, the Opposition to the Motion to Strike

did not arrive before the 5p.m. deadline. However the email labeled the Amicus Brief did arrive as Exhibit 1 Amicus Brief on Natural Born for Memorandum of Law for Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. Exhibit 1 is an Amicus Brief that was just accepted into Obama ballot eligibility cases in Georgia, it is not illogical, nonsensical and not worthy of consideration. On its face as an Amicus Brief that proves Obama is NOT Constitutionally eligible. The Examiner appears to have made this judgment out of context. The Amicus Brief is a thorough legal brief based in law which 100% supports Objectors argument that Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen because of post 14th Amendment Supreme Court ruling Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. pg. 167-168 (1875). Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. pg. 167-68 (1875): Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President, and that Congress shall have power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization. The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or naturalborn citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens (emphasis added).

Objector resubmits the above referenced Amicus Brief by Leo Donofrio as his adopted Memorandum of Law for this petition. (Exhibit 1) 2. OBJECTOR CONTESTS PARAGRAPH 4 UNDER MOTION TO DISMISS The Hearing Examiner contends that the birth certificate attached as Exhibit A clearly establishes the Candidates eligibility for office as a Natural Born Citizen. The Hearing Examiner is legally incorrect on his assessment that Obamas birth certificate proves he is a Natural Born U.S. citizen. Obamas counsel has submitted never before seen prima facie evidence to the Illinois State Elections Board. Obamas long form Hawaii birth certificate was not available to the Board during the 2008 election cycle. This birth certificate proves that Obama is a native born citizen of the United States and on its face also proves that Candidate Obama is NOT a NATURAL Born Citizen. His mother Stanley Ann Dunham was a U.S. Citizen but his father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., was a Kenyan foreign national with British Citizenship that was passed to Candidate Obama by right at his birth under the British Nationality Act of 1948: 4)Subject to the provisions of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and Colonies after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by

birth: (5)Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth ...." Further, Obama, Sr. was only on a student visa in the United States at the time of Candidate Obamas birth. (Exhibit 2) Candidate Obama, a British born citizen, cannot possibly be a U.S. Natural Born Citizen. Moreover, the federal government recognizes that there is a legal difference between Native born and Natural Born citizens: (http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-048602.html). Candidate Obamas attorney argued and Hearing Examiner appears to erroneously believe that dicta from an Indiana Appellate Court case (Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana 916 N.E. 2d 678 (In. App. 2009) overrides the U.S. Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett on the definition of Natural Born Citizen. Candidate Obama is a Constitutionally ineligible candidate for President and he cannot possibly have valid nomination papers, because any nominating petition signed would be fraudulent on its face. The Illinois State Election Board has been duly informed of Candidate Obamas U.S. Constitutional ineligibility under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, of the U.S. Constitution. If the Board allows Candidate Obama on the ballot, they commit massive fraud against the citizens of the state of Illinois.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Michael Jackson ______________________________

Michael Jackson, OBJECTOR 1/31/2012

JacksonlRl.jpg

(JPEG Image, 609

746 pixels)

http://obamaballotchallenge.comlwp-contentluploads/20

12/0 1IJ acks ...

'N,lli::\rr'

~, eGIIH~g~

IL State BO Chairmen

1020 Sprm~ St.

:Sp l.ngfl ld, IL 6

o~
McGutfage, M~'fr:sj,den t is
law "biding I can

Dc.ar Chalrman M name

f

IS

I an a rc is crcd voter in rne

'11

'5 ate of IL I arn a constrtuuenatrv

.5. cinz
b

tiorn

Of! U.S. &011, I\.1 father rbat I

"<IS born

in MO

born ro

U,S.

ctuzen narcnt

. Thi

attc-; to,

cannot attest
r:

am a

Na

rat Born Citjz e n

a rnv mo her Was not nat rralrzed Born Citilen.

<lS;;,

U.S. citizen untd arter I~'

born,

hus I could

never be a Natu

ar

Demo oauer for Il d a lO~5

Girt_,iej, [p
N

ralic pr rrnarv

for

r~

Iden!

to I!ltnol

5tatulte

10 H.eS 5/1.0-5 c.hap 46, P4ra

v:

SJ~d (<If'ldid<!tt!

bt~/,Il()lrst duly sworn' [

T

a,nd 45io1ed~ I ha et
UJl<l1l

$.:lld c.;;nl;ikh'He Is.

queo:.[I<;Jn a~ [
Illy

/t,:lJonyq
~Jl
l(Jilt
pH

eunea

[Q

hold such on ojtice . WIU) g((~(ll c ncern to "hgoffy quallfiad to hold sucb tm

I Ii

W'r"

_dl(J

.~ tl 'JrliS

olP

C-I

am

h' r.~WjCll:' i!!gGi'l

bmltung

bjector'

petruor."

aut to

10 ILCS 5/10-8 ch,ap 46 p,na 10e:~Whl;;(!i:b'y' "0 r

rt!l ... ~ -.., hovuu; ob; !JOII~ so unv cril/lcul<:

ti creo] II" U.J<: prin

Ipat iljji'-<;' or ,he' rl "U[.P1 (Uy

{JJ

pt1l1 l(jfliJnl

b'-'w,IC.h offlCti Of t ti SWle

Boar a oj -/ .;!to/JS,. or
rt'

I"

tbe

affice. of
(10

e etecu

loulf di!cll'oll

DfP

.hjl wttb
\'1

whom
II
fL:!>

fin'

cl:rrljl

of nomlnatlon,

tiaotior: putiecs or pctuioo;

re on [iic".

rv

renvOf,

to 10 fl.eS S/lA-2.1 (from Ch. 46,

subscribe

to the Constit utronot oat

,.. "YOUI' ch a

gP.15

gr

~! 111 D

er

to porE:'Sf:

thl:

Int 'gnry <If our

dlJt.), is to prohibit

and rcr

ove f r orn our ,Prim:;'"

and

'in !! I'. I

,~I ctro n b Ilot fl.'

, a N,.[lJr:t1 as vet b
111

I'. tlMilC

Oharna.
- n in or

<!~

! cis
p

not "Jcgaf/y qlloii[i

Nlegal/y

.a: to

hold th _ Off[

0;' rr8~,Id!~nr. n O The, U

Fnl1S

Born

Cit.i

cW' to'

quotifiedto

hotd suc/) ail o!Ticc"

. Cous trrution

in A.rticle llSecticn I CI.ause V

5(0 CS, ar rbc time

oj rhe Adoptio
i

oitins

Constr

.1Ii('}Il,

shall be (,,(I(Jib/p
av= 0 tinned

f(

tbe (jfi

eat Pr(.~.i{J(rt;n.

ifn J

shot! any Person be eifg.

If" r()

(It Office who

{[11?

.'iQ/lllor

to tire ilgp of rn'Fry-five

PC!r~,and

been fourteen

Yeors o R rsicen: within

11ft

Unitl2'dStates '" W", h~ v ,~U.S. Supre ~ f! COLIn pr~c.edent

S p . 167-' (1875),

e tablishrng Article II S!xn n I v

the (ul,ng of Minot v, Hap(.ler ett, 88

1 of 1

1/11120127:33

AM

Jackson-2.jpg (JPEG Image, 1986

2724 pixels) - Scaled (21 %)

http://obamaballotchallenge.comlwp-contentiuploads/20

I 210 I IJ acks ...

"Addition<might alway. be mode to the cnuensntp of the United stores In two ways: first by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself- for it provides that 'no oetson except a natural-born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, sholl be eligible to the office of President,' and that Congress shalt have power 'to establish a uniform rule of naturottzotion.' Thus new ctttzens may be born or they may be created by naturalization. "The Constitutlon does not, in words, soy who shall be noturat-bom citizens. Resort must be hod elsewhere to ascertain that. A t common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficientfor everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens" (emphasis added).
In addition, supporting case law has been adjudicated by the Ll.S, Supreme Court which confirms and

helps define a Natural Born Citizen. 1. The Venus, 12 U,S. 8 Cranch 253 289 (1814): Justice Livingston, who wrote the unanimous decision, quoted the entire 212nd paragraph from the French edition of Vattel: 'The citizens are the members of the civilsociety; bound to this society by certain duties, and

subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights." 2. Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830): Justice Story, who gave
the ruling, cites the principle of citizenship enshrined in his definition of a "natural born citizen": ... she

might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country.
In light of these facts it is important the public his birth certificate to know that on April 27, 2011, Barack Hussein Obama released to servers. It clearly shows Barack Hussein in December 1963, it was

and placed it on government

Obama's father as being born in Kenya. Prior to Kenya becoming independent a colony of the commonwealth of Great Britain.

Barack Obama Sr., was a British citizen and a subject to

lofl

1111120127:34 AM

Jackson3.jpg(JPEG

Image, 1974

2754 pixels) - Scaled (21%)

http://obamaballotchall enge.com/wp-contentluploads/20

12/0 1/Jackso ...

British law and this according to the British Nationality provisions

Act of 1948 as follows:

(1/)"5ubject to the

of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and Colonies after the of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by birth: (S)Subject of this section, a person born after the commencemenr if his father to

commencement the provisions

of this Act shall be a citizen of the

United Kingdom and Colonies by descent the time of the birth ...

is a citizen of rhe Unlred Kingdom and Colonies ot

Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama's father became a British citizen under Section 4 by being born on the soil of an English Colony, Kenya. Under Section 5, when Obama was born in 1961 in Hawaii or some other place, he automatically became a British citizen by descent from his father who

was a British citizen under Section 4. Barack Obama's father never became a U.S. citizen. He was a foreign student on a VISA granted by the INS. Supporting documents and references will be provided to attest to the veracity of these facts ( It therefore appears that Barack Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements ). for seeking and

holding the office of President of the United States because: Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen, as required by Article II, Section 1of the United States Constitution. Obama's qualifications Accordingly, I hereby challenge Mr.

to seek and hold the office of President of the United States on such grounds. of Barack Hussein Obama on the U.S. Presidential ballot.

I, Michael Jackson seek relief by the prohibition

Barack Hussein Obama is not "legally qualified" to be on the presidential ballot as he is not a Natural Born Citizen, which is a requirement mandated in Article II Section I Clause V of our U.S. Constitution to

be eligible for President or Vice President. expenses incurred; that my 14th Amendment deprived nor caused to suffer injury.

Moreover, I would seek relief in the recovery of all litigation rights provided in Section 1 of U.S. Constitution are not

For Christ and Country and Most Respectfully, Signedy/t-d,oJ! Date

!jl
(

~l(i:,6'>-

!- t) - I L
V'v CJ..- 5Zl.

lj
_
<,.,

SEAl. TERRY L. SCHULTZ

NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF IUJHOIS , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~*~5

1 of 1

1111120127:35 AM

Gmail - Exception to Board's Recommendation

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&search=a...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

Exception to Board's Recommendation

1 message michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:59 PM Cc: "Tenuto, Jim" <jtenuto@elections.il.gov>, capitolaction@yahoo.com, "Menzel, Ken" <KMenzel@elections.il.gov>, "Sandvoss, Steve" <SSandvoss@elections.il.gov>, "Harrington, Bernadette" <BHarrington@elections.il.gov>, "Klos, Sue" <SKlos@elections.il.gov> Bcc: Pamela Barnett <pamelabarnett@mail.com> See attached for subject. Sincerely, Michael Jackson BEFORE THE DULY CONSTITUTED ELECTORAL BOARD.docx 17K

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:39 PM

Gmail - Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Eligib...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

1 message michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Cc: jtenuto@elections.il.gov, capitolaction@yahoo.com Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM

Case No 12SOEB GP104 The file did not make it through and somehow I sent you you your motion. Thank you for alerting me to this. I thought it was attached. Sincerely, Michael Jackson

obama ballot challenge opposition to motion to dismiss.pdf 393K

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:05 PM

Gmail - Exhibit 1 Amicus Brief on Natrual Born for Memorandum of La...

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Crim...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

Exhibit 1 Amicus Brief on Natrual Born for Memorandum of Law for Oppostion to Motion to Dismiss
1 message michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Bcc: jtenuto@elections.il.gov, capitolaction@yahoo.com Amicus Brief Exhibit 1 Motion in Opposition To Dismiss Case No 12SOEB GP104 Sincerely, Michael Jackson AMICUS BRIEF NBC.pdf 7627K Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:55 PM

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:08 PM

Gmail - Exception To Recommendation To Strike & Dismiss

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Crim...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

Exception To Recommendation To Strike & Dismiss

2 messages michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> To: "Tenuto, Jim" <jtenuto@elections.il.gov>, capitolaction@yahoo.com Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:58 PM

Jim & et al., Good afternoon. Please find attached my submission of Exception to Hearing Officer's Recommendation of Motion to Strike and Dismiss Objector's Petition. Including Amicus Brief & Obama Sr Alien Card. Thank you. Case No. 12 SOEB GP 104 Most Sincerely, Michael Jackson

3 attachments amicus brief donofrio.pdf 7621K obama senior alien card.pdf 20K Exception to BOE Hearing Examiner.docx 17K

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:24 PM To: "Sandvoss, Steve" <SSandvoss@elections.il.gov>, "Harrington, Bernadette" <BHarrington@elections.il.gov>, "Menzel, Ken" <KMenzel@elections.il.gov>, "Klos, Sue" <SKlos@elections.il.gov> Bcc: Pamela Barnett <pamelabarnett@mail.com> I am forwarding this e-mail to you that I sent to Jim and Michael regarding my submitting an Exception to the Recommendation to Strike and Dismiss Most Sincerely, Michael Jackson
[Quoted text hidden]

3 attachments amicus brief donofrio.pdf 7621K obama senior alien card.pdf 20K Exception to BOE Hearing Examiner.docx 17K

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:12 PM

Gmail - Excerpt of State Board Meeting 2/2/12

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Eligib...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

Excerpt of State Board Meeting 2/2/12

2 messages Erin Johnson <EJohnson@mcdeps.com> To: "jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com" <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:19 PM

FIRST TIME E-TRAN USERS: YOU MUST DOWNLOAD VIEWER - CLICK HERE

http://reallegal.com/softwareDownloadETranscriptViewer.asp

For assistance installing your E-Transcript Viewer or questions about a transcript, please call 312-263-0052 and ask for the Production Department or email production@mcdeps.com For McCorkle Repository username and password please call us at 312-263-0052 or email chuck@mcdeps.com To Schedule with McCorkle, please call 1.800.MCCORKLE (800-622-6755) or email schedule@mcdeps.com Use our Online Repository Securely Stream Legal Videos 24/7 Download or view Transcripts and Exhibits Schedule quickly and easily with Smart Scheduling Access your Personal Calendar, Invoices and more Free McCorkle App at the iTunes Store and Android Market

Download Viewer

My E-Transcript

Schedule

Services

2 attachments excerpt 2-2-12 jackson.txt 10K excerpt 2-2-12 jackson.docx 20K

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> To: Pamela Barnett <pamelabarnett@mail.com>

[Quoted text hidden]

Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:21 PM

2 attachments

1 of 2

2/8/2012 12:21 PM

Gmail - Excerpt of State Board Meeting 2/2/12

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Eligib...

excerpt 2-2-12 jackson.txt 10K excerpt 2-2-12 jackson.docx 20K

2 of 2

2/8/2012 12:21 PM

Gmail - rules of proceedure

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Crim...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

rules of proceedure
1 message Pamela Barnett <pamelabarnett@mail.com> To: michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:48 PM

illinois board presidential rules.pdf 140K

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:24 PM

Gmail - FW: Jackson v Obama; 12 SOEB GP 104

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=efef195ac6&view=pt&cat=Crim...

michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com>

FW: Jackson v Obama; 12 SOEB GP 104

2 messages Tenuto, Jim <JTenuto@elections.il.gov> Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:13 PM To: "capitolaction@yahoo.com" <capitolaction@yahoo.com>, michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Cc: "Sandvoss, Steve" <SSandvoss@elections.il.gov>, "Harrington, Bernadette" <BHarrington@elections.il.gov>, "Menzel, Ken" <KMenzel@elections.il.gov>, "Klos, Sue" <SKlos@elections.il.gov> The Parties are hereby advised that this matter will be decided by the State Officers Electoral Board at their meeting on February 2, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Chicago Office of the State Board of Elections with a video hook-up to the Springfield Office. Parties may appear if they desire.

James Tenuto Hearing Examiner

From: Nauman, Andy Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:52 PM To: Tenuto, Jim Subject: Jackson v Obama

Michael Jackson v Barack Obama.PDF 73K

Tenuto, Jim <JTenuto@elections.il.gov> Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:30 PM To: "Tenuto, Jim" <JTenuto@elections.il.gov>, "capitolaction@yahoo.com" <capitolaction@yahoo.com>, michael jackson <jesuschristsbloodsaves@gmail.com> Cc: "Sandvoss, Steve" <SSandvoss@elections.il.gov>, "Harrington, Bernadette" <BHarrington@elections.il.gov>, "Menzel, Ken" <KMenzel@elections.il.gov>, "Klos, Sue" <SKlos@elections.il.gov> In reviewing the Recommendation, I noticed that Par. 9 was incorrectly included and made a part of my Recommendation. Par. 9 should be stricken as the Objector DID timely file Objectors Opposition to Candidates Motion to Strike and Dismiss Objectors Petition. The Objectors Motion was noted in Par. 10 of the Recommendation and was considered in reaching the Recommendation set forth. The Recommendation is not changed by this oversight in Par. 9. Par. 9 only applies to 12 SOEB GP 103 which is Freeman v. Obama.

Jim Tenuto Hearing Examiner

From: Tenuto, Jim Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 1:14 PM To: capitolaction@yahoo.com; 'michael jackson' Cc: Sandvoss, Steve; Harrington, Bernadette; Menzel, Ken; Klos, Sue Subject: FW: Jackson v Obama; 12 SOEB GP 104
[Quoted text hidden]

1 of 1

2/8/2012 12:29 PM