Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 10 Example of Maps from the US Drought Monitor
Datasets on vegetation and other satellite data
23
Claire Englander and Philip Hoehn compiled a Checklist of Online Vegetation and
Plant Distribution Maps (http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/EART/vegmaps.html).
As a mere illustration, a search for maps for Eritrea (Figure 11) led the author to the
Africover website.
The purpose of the Africover Project is to establish a digital georeferenced database
on land cover and a geographic referential for the whole of Africa including:
- geodetical homogeneous referential
- toponomy
- roads
- hydrography
The Multipurpose Africover Database for the Environmental Resources (MADE) is
produced at a 1:200,000 scale (1:100,000 for small countries and specific areas)
2
4
F
i
g
u
r
e
1
1
M
a
p
o
f
t
h
e
V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
a
s
e
t
f
o
r
E
r
i
t
r
e
a
b
y
A
f
r
i
c
o
v
e
r
25
Climate Data
Historical climate data can be obtained from a number of different organisations. The
first place to look would be the World Meteorological Organisation. The World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
It is an intergovernmental organization with a membership of 187 Member States and
Territories. It facilitates the free and unrestricted exchange of data and information,
products and services in real- or near-real time on matters relating to safety and
security of society, economic welfare and the protection of the environment. It
contributes to policy formulation in these areas at national and international levels.
Once you have selected your region of interest you could easily find the respective
organization of the country where the data originated from. For example, a search on
climate data for Nairobi, Kenya gave a listing of the mean temperature and rainfall for
each month in the year (Table 3).
Table 3 WMO search results for climate data on Kenya, Nairobi
Mean Temperature
o
C
Month Daily
Minimum
Daily
Maximum
Mean Total
Rainfall (mm)
Mean Number
of Rain Days
Jan
11.5 24.5 64.1 4
Feb
11.6 25.6 56.5 5
Mar
13.1 25.6 92.8 9
Apr
14.0 24.1 219.4 16
May
13.2 22.6 176.6 13
Jun
11.0 21.5 35.0 5
Jul
10.1 20.6 17.5 3
Aug
10.2 21.4 23.5 4
Sep
10.5 23.7 28.3 4
Oct
12.5 24.7 55.3 7
Nov
13.1 23.1 154.2 15
Dec
12.6 23.4 101.0 8
26
Remote Sensed Data
Use of Remote sensed data has become a standard in drought monitoring. The U.S.
Agency for International Development (USAID) Famine Early Warning System
Network (FEWS NET) is a good source of relevant information for Drought Mapping
in Africa.
FEWS NET is an information system designed to identify problems in the food
supply system that potentially lead to famine, flood, or other food-insecure conditions,
in sub-Saharan Africa. It is a multi-disciplinary project that collects, analyzes, and
distributes regional, national and sub-national information to decision makers about
potential or current famine or flood situations, allowing them to authorize timely
measures to prevent food-insecure conditions in these nations. Countries with FEWS
NET representatives are Burkina Faso, Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mali,
Mauritania, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Somalia, (southern) Sudan, Tanzania,
Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
The goal of FEWS NET is to lower the incidence of drought- or flood-induced famine
by providing to decision makers, timely and accurate information regarding potential
food-insecure conditions. With early warning, appropriate decisions regarding
interventions can be made.
The USGS/EROS Data Center (EDC) works with USAID, the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), and Chemonics International (Chemonics) to provide the
data, information, and analyses needed for the FEWS NET project. NASA and
NOAA collect and process satellite data that are used to monitor the vegetation
condition (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, or NDVI) and rainfall (RainFall
Estimate, or RFE) across the entire African continent. The NDVI and RFE data are
but two tools used by FEWS NET to monitor agricultural conditions in Africa.
Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data is calculated from
measurements from NOAA meteorological satellites. NDVI imagery is calculated
27
from the red and near infra-red reflectances observed by the AVHRR (Advanced Very
High Resolution Radiometer) sensor.
The NDVI image (Figure 12) provides an indication of the vigour and density of
vegetation at the surface. Images of NDVI are sometimes referred to as "greenness
maps" since they represent the vegetative vigour of plants. The data are represented as
coloured maps, with colours representing the density of vegetation.
Processed by NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey, the data are represented as
pixels (cells), with each pixel representing an area of 8.0 x 8.0 km. NDVI values
range between -1 and +1, with dense vegetation having higher values (e.g., 0.4 - 0.7),
and lightly vegetated regions having lower values (e.g., 0.1 - 0.2).
The primary use of these images is to compare the current state of vegetation with
previous time periods, for example the same time in an average year to detect
anomalous conditions. In this case the 'normal' situation is taken as the average
measurements over the period 1995 to 1999. Hence yellow and red colours indicate
reduced vegetation this year compared to 'normal', whereas green colours indicate
increased vegetation this year compared to the 'normal'.
Meteosat Rainfall Estimation (RFE) (Figure 13) imagery is an automated (computer-
generated) product which uses Meteosat infrared data, rain gauge reports from the
global telecommunications system, and microwave satellite observations within an
algorithm to provide RFE in mm at an approximate horizontal resolution of 10 km.
The main use of these data is to provide input for hydrological and
agrometeorological models as well as to provide climate information e.g. compare the
current state of rainfall with previous time periods.
This map portrays Water Requirements Satisfaction Index (WRSI) (Figure 14) values
for a particular crop from the start of the growing season until this time period. It is
based on the actual estimates of meteorological data to-date. For example, if the
cumulative crop water requirement up to this period was 200 mm and only 180 mm
was supplied in the form of rainfall, the crop experienced a deficit of 20 mm during
the period and thus the WRSI value will be ([180 / 200] * 100 = 90.0%). The current
28
WRSI can increase in value in the later part of the growing season if the demand (crop
water requirement) and supply (rainfall) relationship becomes favorable.
Schmidt et al., (2000) found good correlation with sugar cane yield and the NDVI for
some sites in South Africa (Figure 15).
Similar to the US FEWS NET, the United Nations Food and Agricultural
Organisation (FAO) provided NDVI Data from the SPOT-4 satellite (Figure 16).
Figure 12 NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (08/01 - 10, 2006 Dekad 22)
29
Figure 13 RFE: Meteosat Rainfall Estimation (08/01 - 10, 2006 Dekad 22)
Figure 14 WRSI Water Requirements Satisfaction Index (08/01 - 10, 2006 Dekad 22)
30
Figure 15 Plot of sugar cane yield vs NDVI for different sites in South Africa (from Schmidt et al.,
2000)
31
Figure 16 FAO NDVI imagery for Eastern Africa derived from SPOT-4 satellite (Difference between
Current Dekad and Average (1998-2004)). The Colors range from dark red to grey to dark green.
Dark red represents a large decrease and dark green represents an increase in greenness of vegetation
5 Forecasts and Prediction
A substantial number of weather related forecasts are available on the Internet.
SASRI Weather watch (http://www.sasa.org.za/sasri/forecast/index.htm) brings
together several forecasts relevant to the South African sugar industry.
One of the forecasts include that from the South African Weather Services GFCSA -
Global Forecasting Centre for Southern Africa. The precipitation forecasts are given
for six months lead time. Seasonal averages are given as three month rolling means
which correspond to the dynamical anomalies given elsewhere. The scale on each
figure is percentage of normal, blue indicating above normal and red below normal.
Both the mean (Figure 17) and trimean (Figure 18) of the forecasts are displayed.
These are both the same forecast. A forecast consists of ten separate runs with slightly
different starting conditions; each of these runs is termed an ensemble member thus
32
each forecast is run with ten ensemble members. The mean is the average of all
ensemble members of the forecast. The trimean is the average ignoring the extreme
ensemble members (both very wet or very dry ensemble members). The trimean
therefore expresses the central tendency of the ensemble and may give a clearer
indication of the forecast in regions and at times when the normal rainfall is low e.g.
during winter it may be that only 1 (out of 10) ensemble members gives an
abnormally high value which will skew the mean towards above normal whereas the
trimean will ignore it. It is therefore advisable that both the mean and trimean are
compared to see if they agree on the forecast.
On the mean forecast map, shading has been introduced to differentiate two levels of
confidence. The clear area (ie. where there is no shading) shows where the mean of
the ensemble forecasts differs from the model climatology (average climate) at the
90% significance level (according to a students T-test). It indicates where the model is
more 'confident' that the forecast is different to climatology.
Infotech provides daily forecast of weather for South Africa (Figure 19).
33
Figure 17 Mean Precipitation expected for March 2007 (South African Weather services) GFCSA -
Global Forecasting Centre for Southern Africa
Figure 18 Trimean Precipitation expected for March 2007 (South African Weather services) GFCSA -
Global Forecasting Centre for Southern Africa
34
Figure 19 Net Forecasting by InfoTech
Clearly a number of organisations provide drought related information, often
duplicating efforts. Among them found in the literature scan, that have not been
researched by the author include:
o United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Sahel Weather and
Crop Simulation Reports
o FAOs Global Information and Early Warning System for Africa (GIEWS)
o CPCs ENSO Advisory Climate and CPCs African Products
o USAID FEWS current bulletins and reports on conditions in Africa
o The UN International Strategy for Disaster Reductions Global, Regional and
National Fire, Weather and Climate Forecasts
o Relief-Webs national and international news on drought and other disaster-
relief efforts
o Africa News Onlines latest information on hazard facing Africa
o The Interagency Task Force on Disaster Reduction of the ISDR( International
strategy for disaster reduction) vulnerability report entitled Calculation of
Global Drought Hazard
35
o WOAB World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimate reports contain
information and forecasts of world supply-use balances of grains and products.
6 Conclusion
This work looks at the phenomenon of drought in general and its impacts to society.
Drought patterns in Africa are briefly described noting the eight differentt groups in
Africa with characteristic rainfall patterns since 1960.
It is found that ENSO events clearly affect the Horn and Africa group and currently
this is seen with the recent drought in Ethiopia and the more recent drought and floods
in Kenya. Computer models today are able to forecast these events months and
seasons ahead. Another factor that is clearly impacting on the frequency of drought in
Africa is climate change. Scientists predict that, countries in the Sahel region of
Africa will receive more rainfall and floods while Southern Africa will experience
persistent drought in the coming decades due the warming of the Indian Ocean which
is partly due to greenhouse gas emissions from human activity (Kigoto, 2005).
Clearly a number of organisations provide drought monitoring and forecasting tools
for Africa. A pilot study for drought risk in Africa should include a review of all
products supplied by the various organisations, integration of data, collecting of
drought hazard and risk tools available and then interfacing with the insurance
industry to look at or develop a suitable model that can assess the economic risk for
drought in Africa.
36
7 References
Alley, WM, 1984. The Palmer Drought Severity Index: Limitations and Assumptions.
Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23: 1100-1109.
Ambenje, P.G. 2000. Regional Drought Monitoring Centres- The Case of Eastern and
Southern Africa. Proceedings of an Expert Group Meeting held September 5-
7, 2000, in Lisbon, Portugal. Expert Group Meeting on Early Warning
Systems
Cane, M.A., Eshel, G. and Buckland, R.W. 1994: Forecasting maize yield in
Zimbabwe with eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature. Nature
370:204-205.
Dilley, M. and Heyman, B.N. 1995: ENSO and disaster: Droughts, floods and El
Nio/Southern Oscillation warm events. Disasters. 19:3:181-193.
Gibbs W.J.; and J.V. Maher, 1976. rainfall deciles as drought indicators. Bureau of
Meterology Bulletin. No. 48, Commonwealth of Australia, Melbourne
Gommes and Petrassi (extracted from FAO agrometeorology series working paper
No. 9. "Rainfall variability and drought in sub-Saharan Africa since 1960".)
Gommes R.; and F. Petrassi, 1994. Rainfall variability and drought in Sub-Saharan
Africa since 1960. Agrometeteorology Series working Paper No 9, Food and
Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
Jose, A. M., F. O. Magnayon, and F. D. Hilario. 1991. Climate impact assessment for
agriculture. in the Philippines. Unpublished paper, National Workshop on
Drought Planning and Management in the Philippines, Quezon City.
Kigoto, W., 2005. Decades of drought predicted for southern Africa. 2 June 2005.
SciDev.Net.
Laughline G and A. Clark. 2000. Drought Science and Drought Policy in Australia: A
Risk Management Perspective Proceedings of an Expert Group Meeting held
September 5-7, 2000, in Lisbon, Portugal. Expert Group Meeting on Early
Warning Systems
McKee, TB, and NJ Doeskan, and J Kleist, 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple
time scales. Preprints, 9
th
Conference on Applied Climatology, pp 233-236,
January 15-20, Dallas, Texas.
37
McKee, TB, and NJ Doeskan, and J Kleist, 1995. The relationship of drought
frequency and duration to time scales. Preprints, 8
th
Conference on Applied
Climatology, pp 179-184, January 17-22, Anaheim, California.
NDMC http://drought.unl.edu/whatis/what.htm
Nicholls, N. 1985: Impact of the Southern Oscillation on Australian Crops. Journal of
Climatology, 5:553-560.
Nicholls, N. 1986: Use of the Southern Oscillation to predict Australian sorghum
yield. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 38:9-15.
Palmer, WC, 1965. Meteorological Drought. Research Paper No. 45, US Department
of Commerce Weather Bureau, Washington DC.
Schmidt, E.J, Narciso, G, Frost, P., and C Gers., 2000. Application of Remote Sensing
Technology in the SA Sugar Industry, Review of Recent Research. South
African Sugar Research Institute.
Wilhite and Svoboda, 2000. Drought Early Warning Systems in the Context of
Drought Preparedness and Mitigation. Proceedings of an Expert Group
Meeting held September 5-7, 2000, in Lisbon, Portugal. Expert Group
Meeting on Early Warning Systems
Wilhite and Svoboda, Drought Early Warning Systems in the Context of Drought
Preparedness and Mitigation