Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview of talk
Data on gender disparities and trends National, rural/urban, regional, caste Gender disparities in achievement/quality Evidence from within schools, Karnataka Data on household expenditure on boys, girls Rural/urban, regional Theories Gender differences in returns and costs of schooling Family / cultural factors (son preference) Changing nature of the family (Karnataka) Conclusion
2007: Gender gaps in completed level of schooling, by age group and rural/urban sector (NSS 64th round, major states)
Age group/ completed educ 11-13 primary Currently - HPS 14-16 Primary Upper primary Currently enroll secondary 17-19 Primary Upper primary Sec Higher sec Currently in Hsec Rural Male 0.70 (0.46) 0.55 (0.50) 0.83 (0.37) 0.51 (0.50) 0.35 (0.48) Female 0.66 (0.47) 0.51 (0.50) 0.78 (0.41) 0.46 (0.50) 0.30 (0.46) Male 0.80 (0.40) 0.59 (0.49) 0.89 (0.31) 0.65 (0.48) 0.42 (0.49) Urban Female 0.79 (0.41) 0.58 (0.49) 0.88 (0.32) 0.66 (0.47) 0.40 (0.49)
Rural: Comparison across cohorts suggests narrowing gaps over time Urban: insignificant gender gap
Trends in gender gaps in completed higher secondary (12 years) by region, Rural India, (NSS), Ages 19-25
.25 mean of chsec
.05
.1
.15
.2
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
North
central Male
East
West Female
South
Same patterns: Narrowing of gender gaps in all regions; approximately equal gender gaps (2007-08) in all regions Greatest reductions in Central and West With growth, growing disparities in education (male, female) across regions
Urban India (NSS) - Trends in gender gaps in completed higher secondary (12 years) by region, Ages 14-18
mean of chsec
.1
.2
.3
.4
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
1995
2007
North
central
Male
East
West
Female
South
Gaps narrowed in all regions, except East High growth regions are North, West, South
Most recent data is from ASER 2011 Proportion out-of school children (India, rural)
Rural Bihar
Rural Punjab
Data suggest that gaps appear at primary level, and then sustained or narrowed at higher level Ages 20-25, Rural India, 2007
Proportion of ages 20-25 (2007) completed primary: Males: 0.77; Females 0.57 - 20 percentage point difference
1995 survey: Gender gap in primary completions, ages 11-13 (1995): Males 0.63 (0.48); Females 0.47 (0.50) 16 percentage point difference Gender gap in secondary completions, ages 20-25 (2007): Males 0.33 (0.17); Females 0.22 (0.10) 11 percentage point difference Gender gap in higher secondary completions, ages 20-25 (2007): Males 0.18 (0.38); females 0.11 (0.31) 7 percentage point difference Contrary to what one might want: everyone gets at least a primary education, and gender gaps show up at higher levels here, gender gaps are lowest at low levels, and then narrow over time
Pattern is true of all regions Rural India, ages 20-25 (2007-08, NSS)
Region
North Central East West South
Completed primary Males Females 0.81 0.61 (0.40) (0.49) 0.71 0.45 (0.45) (0.50) 0.72 0.59 (0.45) (0.49) 0.87 0.72 (0.33) (0.45) 0.83 0.67 (0.38) (0.47)
Completed higher secondary Males Females 0.22 0.16 (0.41) (0.36) 0.15 0.08 (0.36) (0.28) 0.12 0.08 (0.32) (0.27) 0.23 0.15 (0.42) (0.36) 0.22 0.16 (0.42) (0.36)
Gender gaps much larger at primary level (those who did not complete primary), then at higher secondary level, suggesting that gender differences in completed years of schooling is primarily because of gender differences in those completing primary
Completed primary Males Females 0.86 0.80 (0.35) (0.40) 0.82 0.72 (0.38) (0.45) 0.86 0.78 (0.34) (0.42) 0.92 0.88 (0.28) (0.33) 0.92 0.87 (0.27) (0.34)
Completed higher secondary Males Females 0.39 0.31 (0.49) (0.59) 0.33 0.34 (0.47) (0.47) 0.36 0.31 (0.48) (0.46) 0.39 0.39 (0.49) (0.49) 0.39 0.39 (0.48) (0.49)
Gender gaps much larger at primary level (those who did not complete primary), then at higher secondary level, suggesting that gender differences in completed years of schooling is primarily because of gender differences in those completing primary
By caste - In North, South and West (high growth regions), gender gaps are LARGER amongst upper castes, rural India, ages 14-18, 2007-08 (NSS)
Region
Prop completed upper primary North Central East
SC/ST
Males Females
West
South
0.67 (0.47) 0.50 (0.50) 0.49 (0.50) 0.72 (0.45) 0.78 (0.41)
0.55 (0.50) 0.43 (0.49) 0.52 (0.50) 0.59 (0.49) 0.71 (0.45)
0.44 (0.50) 0.39 (0.49) 0.40 (0.49) 0.58 (0.49) 0.64 (0.48)
0.36 (0.48) 0.32 (0.46) 0.31 (0.46) 0.52 (0.50) 0.63 (0.48)
Alternative way of looking at gender gaps: Of currently enrolled, percentage who are women (NSS, 2007-08) Doesnt standardize for age: gender gaps may reflect differences in acceptable ages at enrollment Differences across levels reflect cohort effects
Same patterns and regional trends revealed in institution level data (MHRD, Annual Report 2010-2011), % of female students in universities and colleges, 2008-09
Region/State
South A.P. Karnataka Kerala Tamil Nadu North Punjab Haryana H.P. Rajasthan
% of female students
41% 44% 56% 47% 51% 43% 47% 37%
Region/state
West Gujarat Maharashtra Central Bihar MP UP Chattisgarh Jharkhand
% of female students
44% 43%
Even here, trend is declining gender gaps MHRD: Number of girls per 100 boys, class IX-XII
Region/State South A.P. Karnataka Kerala 71 82 107 80 89 100 2001-02 2005-06 Region/state West Gujarat Maharashtra 68 76 67 92 2001-02 2005-06
Tamil Nadu
North Punjab Haryana H.P. Rajasthan
84
97
Central
Bihar 44 52 36 57 54 47 58 58 65 62
83 68 86 38
84 76 88 46
MP UP Chattisgarh Jharkhand
While data suggests narrowing gaps in levels of education, what is the evidence regarding quality? Learning gaps less research and data
Current (on-going) study of rural Karnataka schools (720 schools, 11 districts) Very little evidence of a gender gap in learning in the South, and, instead, a reverse gap favoring girls. Government schools only, so results will be biased if brighter boys go to private schools Complete picture will require data which surveys all schools in an area, and conducts same test in all schools (eg. LEAPS, Pakistan)
Test Scores, Rural Karnataka, Grade 3 2009-10 (Karnataka schooling project data)
Test score Language (max=100) Male Female F test for equality Prob > F Mathematics (max=100) Male Female F test for equality Prob > F Full sample 33.91 (0.33) 37.01 (0.34) 42.39* (0.00) Quartile of District EDI rank 1 (top) 2 3 41.17 (0.83) 45.61 (0.80) 14.77* (0.00) 40.19 (0.60) 43.57 (0.62) 15.27* (0.00) 33.14 (0.81) 39.60 (0.80) 32.75* (0.00) 4 26.83 (0.50) 26.78 (0.52) 0.00 (0.95)
Table 8: Test scores for grade 3 students, by gender and District EDI rank Note: Language and math test scores based on grade specific curriculum. Sample size=11,447. Standard errors in parentheses. *Statistically significant different at 1% level
Possibility of gender gap in quality of schooling comes from data on schooling expenditures 1995 and 2007 particularly in urban areas
5,000
4,000
1,000
1,000
4,000
5,000
1995
2007
1995
2007
RURAL
URBAN
Expenditure on schooling (all items), on children ages 12-15 currently enrolled in higher primary school or higher (NSS Education Surveys).
Reflects enrollment in private schools, of far greater significance in urban areas (NSS education surveys, 1995 and 2007)
.4
.3
mean of pvt .2
.1
.1
mean of pvt .2
.3
.4
1995
2007
1995
2007
Rural
Urban
Urban India: regional variation in education expenditure, 1995 & 2007 (ages 12-15, currently enrolled upper primary or higher) particularly high in North and Central regions (traditional son preference)
8,000
3,000 mean of tuition
6,000
mean of edexp
4,000
2,000
1,000 0
2,000
1995
1 2
2007
1995
1 2
2007
Rural India: regional variation in education expenditure, 1995 & 2007 (ages 12-15, currently enrolled upper primary or higher) Again high in North, but also in South
3,000
mean of edexp
2,000
mean of tuition
1,000
200
400
600
800
1995
1 2
2007
1995
1 2
2007
Theory
Predicting narrowing gaps: due to higher returns to schooling for women; increases in maternal education; higher income elasticity of demand for female education (Maitra et al, 2012) Munshi and Rosenzweig (2004) rates of return from pvt schooling are higher for women, but only amongst lower castes reverse gender gap for lower castes, but no predictions for higher castes Increasing gaps: Transition from agricultural to non-agricultural economy may initially cause increasing gender gaps which will then be narrowed - inverted U hypothesis (Goldin) diff. in rates of return in transition Greater credit constraints as incomes rise, causing greater gender inequality in household expenditure.
In India, general belief that effect of rates of return mediated by gender differences in returns to parents from sons/daughters
Traditionally believed that this would exacerbate effect of any gender differences in return May also generate increasing gender gaps
Das Gupta and Bhat (1997): with rising incomes and consequent decline in fertility, a reduction in the parity effect (discrimination against girls at higher parities) but increase in the intensification effect (greater discrimination at lower parities), with latter effect dominating.
Underlying reason: family systems with strong disincentives against investments in girls
Problem with that explanation: insufficient attention to changing nature of the family (survey data, Karnataka, 2009-10)
father Mother
Grandparents financially dependent on children Parents expect to be financially dependent on children In families which support their parents, proportion of parents who expect to depend on their children
26%
54%
29%
53%