Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK david.humphreys@npl.co.uk 2 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven B-3001 Leuven, Belgi dominique.schreurs@esat.kuleuven.be
Phase standards
Device A: Based on a step-recovery diode and is specified to operate over an octave bandwidth 600 MHz 1200 MHz. The RF power level is monitored using an external RF power meter to ensure a reproducible operating point. Device B: A prototype based on a newer technology and operates over at a wider drive frequency range 100 MHz 1.25 GHz. RF power is internally levelled.
Measurement systems
Direct measurement to achieve the highest accuracy. Maximum DSO trace (100 k samples) allows high-resolution time-corrected measurements over >100 ns epoch. Two 70 GHz DSOs (different manufacturers) used. In-phase and Quadrature (IQ) timebase correction to compensate for timebase nonlinearity and jitter. < 500 fs rms residual jitter in the timebase corrected signal. IQ frequency selected so that no intermodulation product falls on a comb line. Load-pull measurements determine match and verify linear behaviour. Impedance match measurements of test system (and phase-standard).
Variable repetition rate (MHz to GHz) 5 ps to 30 ps pulse width Phase standard under test
Synthesizer 2
10 dB attenuator
CH4 20 GHz
Synthesizer 3
CH4 20 GHz
Reference plane
10 dB attenuator
Device A: Significant variation of the pulse amplitude and shape with drive frequency. Pulse-shape sensitivity with RF drive-power. Manual RF power levelling gives a residual uncertainty due to power meter calibration and setting accuracy. Interpolation by parametric fitting to the harmonic data components is appropriate for this design.
Device B: Load-pull signals at 29.7 GHz. Slow phase variation 63 mRad/sec during measurement to give good coverage.
Device B: Pulse-shape appears to be weakly dependent on the repetition rate. The RF power is internally levelled - no additional uncertainty contributions. Interpolation of the response at different repetition rates should be possible. A single curve fitted to all the complex frequency components will simplify modelling.
Conclusions
Source match correction is essential to achieve low phase-uncertainty. Timebase and jitter correction is essential to achieve < 500 fs variation over a time epoch of 200 ns with a point spacing of 2 ps. Trigger jitter degrades the results at low repetition rates <100 MHz. Predicting the phase-standard response over a range of drive frequencies should be possible but the model will depend on the phase-standard technology. Both phase-standards behave linearly under low-level load-pull signal injection. This may allow the measurement system to be further simplified.
9803/0911 Queens Printer and Controller of HMSO, 2011.
Acknowledgments
The NPL authors thank the industrial and academic collaborators in this project for their advice and the loan of phase-standard devices. The NPL authors would like to thank the BIS National Measurement Office for financial support under the Physical Metrology programme.
Device B: Time-domain waveform shape unaffected be repetition rate Device B: Normalised signal components unaffected by repetition rate
The NPL Authors thank LeCroy for the loan of two 20 GHz sampling heads.
www.npl.co.uk