You are on page 1of 3

DfM Report

PCB : 20-5001-00000030 RevP00

Client : Thomas&Betts

1. In order to properly orient the TH connectors with respect to the wave and to avoid warpage of the board during wave soldering, the PCB must be oriented in the wave soldering machine with J5 or J12 in the front. This makes that most SMT components on the bottom side need to be rotated 90 degrees, just like C12 in order to be properly oriented, to avoid skips. 2. Still in order to prevent skip solder, the SMT component pads need to be extended 0.010 each towards the exterior, in order to allow for more wetting surface. 3. To avoid solder bridges on TH components, the annular rings of the TH parts have to be adjusted so that the Cu to Cu spacing is 0.035, in the case of RoHS products. J5, J10-13, J16 and all the JPs, at minimum, need the annular rings to be decreased. 4. Many SMT pads need thermal relieving connections to Cu planes, in order to avoid excessive heat during soldering and even higher heat, should rework be required. See red boxes in Image 1 for examples of the mentioned situation. For calculus of thermal reliefs see IPC2222 paragraph 9.1.2. They are defined in IPC-2221, paragraph 9.1.3.

Image 1 5. Several polarized components, e.g. D5 and D7 have the polarity mark under the body of the component, once it is installed, therefore not visible after assembly, see Image 2. Polarity marks outside of the body is advisable.

DfM Report

PCB : 20-5001-00000030 RevP00

Client : Thomas&Betts

Image 2 6. The central pads of U1 and U2 have 0.013 via holes, see Image 3, that will drain a large quantity of solder in reflow. This will create large voids in the central joint that may affect the thermal or grounding properties. To limit draining, the vias should be 0.008 in diameter.

Image 3

DfM Report

PCB : 20-5001-00000030 RevP00

Client : Thomas&Betts

7. Fab note 5 asks for 0.005 tolerance for the board thickness. As this is hard and costly to obtain, I recommend a 10% tolerance request.

Disclaimer: This report is the result of a visual inspection of mainly the top and bottom layers. This inspection is not in any way exhaustive and points certain design issues that, if resolved, would reduce the assembly costs or, in certain cases, improve the long term reliability of the product. The component footprints are not all checked, but only a few of them, known problematic, are verified according to the experience of the consultant or the IPC-7351B libraries. The PCB manufacturing issues are, most likely, not all identified and a thorough computerized analysis by a PCB manufacturer is recommended. The interpretation and implementation of this document is at customers free will and Ioan Tempea, ing., is not to be held liable to any expenses related to the said implementation.

You might also like