Great leadership is twofold: good management and heroic responsibility. Good management is the process of motivating others to become part of a collective. Heroic responsibility is the willingness to accept responsibility for the state of the world today.
Great leadership is twofold: good management and heroic responsibility. Good management is the process of motivating others to become part of a collective. Heroic responsibility is the willingness to accept responsibility for the state of the world today.
Great leadership is twofold: good management and heroic responsibility. Good management is the process of motivating others to become part of a collective. Heroic responsibility is the willingness to accept responsibility for the state of the world today.
Harry Anderson The Presidential Leadership Academy 09/15/2011
The
Effective
Leader
After
three
years
at
Penn
State
and
two
in
the
PLA,
how
would
you
now
define
the
traits
of
an
effective
leader?
After
two
years
in
the
PLA
and
as
a
student
in
the
Smeal
College
of
Business,
I
find
myself
ripe
with
definitions
and
examples
of
"effective"
leadership,
but
I
would
argue
that
we
seldom
see
truly
great
leadership
today,
and
I
will
tell
you
why.
Character
traits,
learned
abilities,
and
knowledgebase
will,
no
doubt,
contribute
to
one's
success
and
failure
as
a
manager,
but
great
leadership
has
a
lot
more
to
do
with
the
leader's
response
to
the
world
around
him:
how
will
he
choose
to
relate
to
his
peers,
but
more
than
anything,
his
willingness
to
accept
responsibility
for
the
state
of
the
world
today.
Great
leadership
is
twofold:
good
management
and
heroic
responsibility
(the
former
being
in
my
mind
the
greater
of
the
two).
Good
management
is
the
process
of
motivating
others
to
become
part
of
a
collective
in
order
to
conquer
something
of
consequence.
We
know
this
because,
logically,
if
you
choose
to
exert
influence
on
another
individual,
it
must
be
either
for
good
or
for
bad
(corruption)
in
one
degree
or
another.
If
it
is
for
good,
then
it
only
makes
sense
that
the
leader
is
driven
to
complete
the
task
even
more
than
the
subject
would
be,
and
it
is
in
his
best
interest
to
create
subjects
who
share
that
drive
too
(because
motivation
will
inevitably
inspire
efficiency).
Now,
we
need
only
ask
ourselves
what
it
takes
to
cause
someone
else
to
conform
to
our
own
ideology
and
goals.
I
would
argue
that
it
takes
two
things:
first,
to
convince
them
that
the
source
(the
leader)
is
rational
and
virtuous
(because
it
would
seem
that
human
nature
is
prone
to
being
inspired
by
heroism),
and
second,
that
the
goal
is
in
line
with
(of
high
importance
within)
the
subject's
own
value
system.
In
my
experience,
achieving
the
second
will
always
be
made
harder
by
the
absence
of
the
first.
In
order
for
teams
to
function
properly,
authority
-whether
higher
or
equal
- needs
to
be
respected,
and
yet
this
is
one
of
the
most
difficult
predicaments:
authority
must
be
respected,
and
yet
if
it
is
to
be
respected,
it
can
never
be
demanded;
it
must
always
be
earned.
This
summer
I
had
the
pleasure
of
getting
to
know
some
Air
Force
Academy
cadets,
who
were
always
eager
to
share
with
me
the
anecdotes
of
the
authority
structure
that
they
lived
in.
Being
in
the
Air
Force,
they
were
charged
to
obey
orders
from
senior
Airmen,
and
Harry Anderson The Presidential Leadership Academy 09/15/2011
although
they
were
commanded
to
it,
their
submission
was
very
often
reluctant.
The
reason
is
this:
although
earned
authority
is
completely
valid,
it
will
never
inspire
the
same
eagerness
in
men
and
women
that
heroism
and
selflessness
will.
In
management,
this
is
called
post-heroism:
the
willingness
of
a
manager
to
work
alongside
his
employees
to
achieve
the
goal,
rather
than
just
delegating
the
work.
The
effect
is
this:
if
your
boss
is
working
alongside
you
on
your
task,
as
well
as
performing
his
own
managerial
duties,
you
will
never
have
cause
to
resent
him
for
the
work
that
he
assigns
to
you,
because
you
will
have
no
doubt
that
at
the
very
least,
he
is
as
committed
as
you
are
to
completing
the
task.
So,
in
case
I
lost
you
there:
good
leadership
is
this:
the
willingness
of
the
manager
to
come
off
of
his
pedestal
and
get
his
hands
in
the
dirt
too.
This
is
effective
on
so
many
levels:
first
and
foremost,
to
assure
his
subjects
that
his
duty
is
not
to
be
a
dictator,
but
rather
a
facilitator,
and
secondly
to
understand
the
problem
at
hand
from
the
bottom-up.
If
you
think
about
it,
in
business,
in
government,
rarely
do
the
leaders
fully
understand
what
goes
on
at
the
bottom;
but
the
best
ones
almost
always
do.
Southwest
Airlines
is
the
only
US
airline
that
has
consistently
been
profitable
since
9/11.
They
did
this
because
they
understood
the
needs
of
their
customers,
and
they
were
able
to
know
those
needs
because
of
their
unique
organizational
structure:
no
matter
how
high-level
an
executive
you
are
at
Southwest,
you
are
required
to
work
twice
a
year
in
as
a
check-in
agent.
This
practice
not
only
communicates
to
the
lower-level
employees
that
they
are
a
vital
part
of
the
organization,
but
it
gives
the
executives
keen
insight
into
which
processes
help
customer
service,
and
which
ones
hinder
it.
But
method
is
hardly
even
a
fraction
of
what
good
leadership
is.
You
could
be
the
best
manager
in
the
world,
but
what
will
it
matter
if
all
that
you
do
with
it
is
find
a
way
to
sell
more
widgets?
No;
the
good
leader
recognizes
the
corruption
in
society
and
decides
that
he
won't
stand
for
it.
It
seems
that
in
recent
years
mankind
is
losing
its
responsibility
to
the
pursuit
of
justice
and
righteousness,
and
has
traded
it
for
the
comfort
of
ignorance
and
apathy.
I
am
convinced
that
the
mark
of
the
great
leader
today
is
his
frustration
with
the
status
quo,
and
his
courage
to
disrupt
it.
I
may
be
at
odds
with
you
in
my
convictions,
but
I
believe
that
our
responsibility
as
citizens
and
humans
extends
beyond
ourselves
and
what
we
can
gain
from
our
circumstances.
The
reality
is
that
our
world
may
be
more
tormented
by
oppression,
slavery,
violence,
disease
and
poverty
today
than
ever
before,
and
after
3
Harry Anderson The Presidential Leadership Academy 09/15/2011
years
at
Penn
State,
I
have
learned
that
it
simply
isn't
right
to
overlook
violence,
poverty
and
injustice,
and
that
none
of
us
are
free
of
responsibility
toward
our
neighbors
-near
or
far.
But
complacency
is
the
norm
in
our
world
today,
and
it
is
my
conviction
that
no
matter
how
much
wealth
you
amass,
or
which
office
you
hold,
if
you
disregard
your
responsibility
toward
your
fellow
man
-here
and
far
away
-then
you
may
just
as
well
be
poor
and
without
stature,
because
wealth
and
power
will
never
be
eternal.
Of
course,
you
may
disagree
completely
with
my
view
on
the
things
that
matter
-love,
joy,
peace,
righteousness,
and
the
things
that
don't
-wealth,
stature,
influence.
But
that
rests
in
your
view
of
existence,
and
whether
absolute
truth
and
morality
exist.
I
have
learned
in
my
time
here
at
Penn
State
that
influencing
others
for
the
sake
of
personal
gain
is
never
constructive,
but
sadly
I
do
believe
that
many
today
would
respond
apathetically
to
such
a
notion.
And
I
think
that
that
may
be
the
difference:
apathy
or
action
-and
the
pursuit
of
the
things
that
are
just
and
the
things
that
are
right.
Ultimately,
in
the
world
as
I
have
come
to
know
it,
a
good
leader
is
one
who
accepts
his
responsibility
toward
his
fellow
man,
and
seeks
to
gain
nothing
for
himself
from
his
position.
He
does
not
use
his
power
to
oppress
other,
but
rather
he
seeks
to
set
the
captive
free.
He
doesn't
limit
his
responsibility
to
his
constituents
or
to
his
shareholders,
but
to
the
pursuit
of
justice,
and
sacrifices
himself
entirely
for
it.
He
speaks
not
of
his
actions,
but
he
lets
his
actions
speak
of
his
character.
This
is
the
leader
that
the
world
actually
needs.
And
it
is
a
sad
moment
to
realize
that
I
may
never
be
this
man.
For
who
of
us
is
wise
enough
or
disciplined
enough
or
compassionate
enough
to
care
more
about
our
fellow
man
than
we
do
about
ourselves?
I
hope
that
one
day
I
will.
(Evolutionary Psychology) Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Lisa L. M. Welling, Todd K. Shackelford - Evolutionary Perspectives On Social Psychology (2015, Springer) PDF