Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In construction projects
Haytham Baraka
Civil Engineer
2012
--
principal
risk/return profile
.
,
risk /return profile
...
...
risk
71
..
71 ,
,
negative events
positive events
or opportunities
:
) )
( )
negative events
positive events
Tasks and outputs
Process
Tasks
Task Outputs
(deliverables)
Risk
management
planning
Risk
identific
ation
Qualitati
ve risk
analysis
Prioritized list of
risks classified as
high, moderate, or
low.
Quantitat
ive risk
analysis
(Only if
the
project
includes
Value
Analysis)
An analysis of the
projects likelihood
of achieving its
cost and time
objectives
Process
Tasks
Risk
response
planning
Risk
monitoring
and control
Task Outputs
(deliverables)
Risk response plan,
including one or
more of the
following: residual
risks, secondary
risks, change
control, contingency
reserve (amounts of
time or budget
needed), and inputs
to a revised project
plan
Workaround plans,
corrective actions,
project change
requests (PCR), and
updates to the risk
response plan and to
risk identification
checklists for
future projects
Role
Spon District Pro
Division jec
sor
Chief
t
for
Man
Program age
and
r
Project
Manageme
nt
Assista
nt
Project
Manager
/
Project
Managem
ent
Support
Unit
Funct
ional
Manag
er
Task
Mana
ger
Risk
managemen
t
planning
Risk
identific
ation
Qualitati
ve risk
analysis
Quantitat
ive risk
analysis
(Performe
d only as
part of
Value
Analysis)
Process
Tasks
Role
Spon District Pro
Division jec
sor
Chief
t
for
Man
Program age
and
r
Project
Manageme
nt
Assista
nt
Project
Manager
/
Project
Managem
ent
Support
Unit
Risk
response
planning
R,
A
Risk
monitorin
g and
control
R,
A
Legend:
R = responsible
S = support
A = approve
Funct
ional
Manag
er
Task
Mana
ger
Construction
Design
Risk
Evaluatio
Risk
Reductio
Risk
Managemen
, (
, )
(
, )
,
mitigation and planning, Assessment, analysis,
updating allocation, and monitoring and
PROJECT-SPECIFIC
DOCUMENTS
Project description
Work breakdown
structure
Cost estimate
Design and construction
schedule
Procurement plan
Listing of teams issues
and concerns
PROGRAMMATIC
DOCUMENTS
Historic data
Checklists
Final project reports
Risk response plans
Organized lessons
learned
Published commercial
databases
Academic studies
TECHNIQUES
Brainstorming
Scenario planning
Expert interviews
Nominal group
methods
Delphi methods
Crawford slip
methods
Influence or risk
diagramming
Risk Characteristics
risk
71
..
71 ,
,
4 ( )
:
7 umbrella approah
2 intuitive approach
-3 ostrich approach
-4 brute force approach
AGAP
All goes according to pan
( )
WHIF
What happens if
:
)
(over est. -
( )
( ) strike
force majeure within budget - ( )
()
( )
( )
,
risk
management strategy
:
Certainly :
,
Risk :
Uncertainly :
Risk
711 3
711
Uncertainly
( )
( )
uncertainly risk
uncertainly
risk opportunity
: controllable risk
( )
: uncontroable risk
critical
activity
( )
( )
( )
(
)
(( ........ ))
identify risks
Each identified risk should be assessed
assessment
:
-7
-2 ,
) as a direct cost ( for example time , cost and so
as indirect cost ( for example
) increase review , planning , new members
Score
Description
Very Low
20
Low
40
Medium
60
High
80
Very High
100
Highly likely to occur as the circumstances which will cause this risk to
eventuate are also very likely to be created
Title
Score
Description
Very Low
20
Low
40
Minor impact on the project, e.g. < 5% deviation in scope, scheduled enddate or project budget
Medium
60
High
80
Very High
100
Major impact on the project, e.g. >25%% deviation in scope, scheduled enddate or project budget
Establish the priority of each risk by identifying the likelihood of
the risk's eventuating and its impact on the project. Once the
likelihood and impact scores have been allocated, the priority
score should be calculated as follows:
Priority equals the average Likelihood and Impact score
This is calculated as Priority = (Likelihood + Impact) / 2
Likelihood
Impact
Priority Score
Rating
1.1
20
80
50
Medium
1.2
80
60
70
High
1.3
100
40
70
High
2.1
40
20
30
Low
2.2
80
100
80
Very High
2.3
20
80
50
Medium
Priority Score
0 20
21 40
41 60
61 80
81 100
Priority Rating
Very low
Low
Medium
High
Very High
( )
Evaluate risks on their worst-case effects and their
relative likelihood of occurrence
( )
,
risk analysis
:
technical performance analysis
FMEA
)failure modesand effects analysis (FMEA
schedule risk analysis
( )
cost risk analysis
, ,
,
... (
, , ,
, )
mitigation
:
( ,
)
(
SWOT analysis ,
decision tree
Risk response
options
(mitigation options)
ignored (by default).
,
,
,
contract or insurance).
allowances ).
shared ( with others , joint venture ,
)Airbus R&D is done by several countries
above.
.
Certainly, the choice will depend on many factors like the
project circumstances, risk nature and so.
Risk response
( )
,
trigger
risk event
( ( risk vent ,
, ,
: 2 accept , transfer ,
share and so
: 3 , 2
2 transfer
3
: 4
( priority
)
( )
, 7
% % 2
,
% 21
,
-7 :excuses
,
( )
)
( )
(
...
( critical activities
)
Communication -3
( )
Plan fallbacks -4
..
,
Risk Charters
or days)
:
.
.
.
(
)
Personal
Name
: Haytham Saleh Baraka
Date of birth : 10/3/1990
Nationality : Egyptian
E-mail
: Haytham.Baraka@eng.zu.edu.eg
Phone
: 2-0128-5358138
Academic qualification
Zagazig University faculty of engineering-civil
engineering
Graduation
project:
construction
project
management (Cairo metro line No.3)
Graduation year: 2012
Courses attended
enough experience in
HD
Business administration
primavera
sap
Customer service
Etabs
Marketing
safe , AutoCAD 2d
Sales
excel, word
Interests
Construction, management and engineering programs
Tower cranes
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79588723/TowerCranes
Tunnels construction
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79235582/Tunnel-Construction-ByHaytham-baraka
&
check (Ana Me3mare ) magazine every month
http://www.facebook.com/Ana.Me3mary
THANK YOU